DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Download M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 Ebook, Epub

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Download M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 Ebook, Epub M103 HEAVY TANK, 1950-74 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Kenneth W. Estes,Richard Chasemore | 48 pages | 19 Mar 2013 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781849089814 | English | United Kingdom M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 PDF Book Army tank engineering of the late s. About This Item. Best for. The heavy tank proved fairly popular with its crews, who above all respected the powerful armament it carried. M7 Priest mm Howitzer Motor Carriage. While the US Army deactivated its heavy armor units with the reception of the new M60 series main battle tanks in , the remaining Ms stayed within the US Marine Corps inventory until they began receiving the M60 series main battle tank. Post—World War II armies have shifted to the Main Battle Tank concept, in which a single model is expected to fulfill the breakthrough functions of a heavy tank while retaining the mobility of medium and light tanks. It may have been the unwanted 'ugly duckling' of the Army, which refrained from naming the M alone of all its postwar tanks. The M is a bit of a footnote in the history of US armour. Welcome to Wargaming. Standard US Army armor battalions at the time had three companies per battalion, each with three five-tank platoons, with 17 tanks per company two tanks were in headquarters platoon. The last Ms were withdrawn from service in Walmart Services. Flag as inappropriate. See all related content. Hannie leads a double life, one as a wife and mother in a Devon manor Range A, Camp Pendleton, California. Ask a question Ask a question If you would like to share feedback with us about pricing, delivery or other customer service issues, please contact customer service directly. Thank you! Free delivery Arrives by Tuesday, Nov 3. The culmination of big-gun German and Soviet tank destroyer design can be found in their Tanks of the United States. Retrieved 25 August Your location:. The outbreak of war in Korea brought a rush order in December which led to a complete production run of vehicles, considered sufficient for Army and Marine Corps requirements. The Marines received MA1s plus the Army's vehicles in This website uses cookies to provide all of its features. In —54 a series of tanks, initially designated T43E1, were built at the Newark plant. Yahoo Life. Kenneth was made an Honorary Legionnaire in the Spanish Legion in Learn more. The outbreak of war in Korea brought a rush order in December which led to a complete production run of vehicles. Although tanks like the Sherman and Panther captured the headlines, the Allies' M10 tank destroyer From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. May 9, Reviewed by Snugglebunnehh Snugglebunnehh. It featured seven road wheels per side, mounted with long-arm independent torsion bars. The T43 design represented the pinnacle of U. After , the Marine Corps alone retained confidence in the heavy tank program, investing its scarce funds in the improvements necessary to bring about its fielding after a hurried production run in midst of the 'tank crisis' of the year The turret of the M was larger than that of the M48 or the M60 to make room for the huge mm gun and the two loaders assigned to it, in addition to the gunner and the commander. We're committed to providing low prices every day, on everything. Recent searches Clear All. Login Create Account. Your question required. In this sharp and witty pastiche of the worlds of John Buchan and Rider Haggard, our heroine brings The outbreak of war in Korea brought a rush order in December which led to a complete production run of vehicles. They are no longer publicly accessible. In a series of tanks, initially designated T43E1, were built by Chrysler at the Newark plant. Though this was partially corrected with the introduction of the AV diesel unit, it would remain cumbersome and fuel-thirsty for the majority of its service life. M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 Writer Add to Wishlist. In , with the threat of war in Europe growing by the day, the US Ask a question Ask a question If you would like to share feedback with us about pricing, delivery or other customer service issues, please contact customer service directly. Army support for the heavy tank was lukewarm at best, and the programme mainly survived because the USMC decided they needed very heavy The outbreak of war in Korea brought a rush order in December which led to a complete production run of vehicles. Image : Wikipedia. After , the Marine Corps alone retained confidence in the heavy tank program, investing its scarce funds in the improvements necessary to bring about its fielding after a hurried production run in midst of the 'tank crisis' of the year It came fast, and was cheaper here than anywhere else. Click here for more information. The eventual retirement of the M in , over 20 years after manufacture and after 14 years of operational service, demonstrated the soundness of its engineering and fulfillment of its designed role. Best for. Thankfully, what the M lacks in armor protection, it compensates in firepower and to a lesser extent mobility. Pros and Cons Pros: Strong turret face armor and mantlet Good gun depression Well-rounded top gun with good performance across the board Huge tracks can help absorb shots when sidescraping Fast turret rotation for such a large turret Cons: Covered with weakspots, shockingly unreliable armor for a heavy tank Limited forward speed and horrible reverse speed Large target, the turret is especially huge Fragile ammo rack and engine modules Low ammo capacity Performance Coming from the T32 , the M could be quite the rude awakening for players used to typical American hull-down tactics. For the Marine Corps, it served the purpose defined for it in until the automotive and weapons technology of the United States could produce viable alternatives. Welcome to The Tank Museum! So this book was exactly what my dad was looking for as its something he used at one point in his life. Namespaces Article Talk. The T43 design represented the pinnacle of U. Do not show this dialog again. The British had the sixty-four-ton Conqueror with a millimeter gun, and even the French had the AMX heavy tank. Damage Per Minute. Related Pages :. Story continues. Thank you. Add to Wishlist Your wishlist has been temporarily saved. Army tank engineering of the late s. He is the editor of several books, and has written extensively in military and academic journals throughout his career. This design scheme was also much more mass efficient than traditional rolled plate armor. The M is a bit of a footnote in the history of US armour. Kenneth was made an Honorary Legionnaire in the Spanish Legion in You may also be interested in the following product s. Historical Info. Learn how to enable JavaScript on your browser. Use cover whenever possible, including your heavily armored allies, and seek opportunities to put your excellent firepower to good use, but never overcommit as that would only result in a trip back to the garage. Kenneth W Estes. Read an excerpt of this book! Manufacturers, suppliers and others provide what you see here, and we have not verified it. The heavy tank proved fairly popular with its crews, who above all respected the powerful armament it carried. M7 Priest mm Howitzer Motor Carriage. Shop Our Brands. Never rush to the frontlines though, as the M cannot take much punishment - leave that job to tougher heavy tanks like the German E 75 or the Soviet Object While their mission was not principally fighting one Army tank engineering of the late s. For the Marine Corps, it served the purpose defined for it in until the automotive and weapons technology of the United States could produce viable alternatives. Please enter a valid email address. With both loaders, the maximum firing rate of the gun was five rounds per minute, owing to the design of the two-piece ammunition. Wikimedia Commons. About this Product. June 7, The outbreak of war in Korea brought a rush order in December which led to a complete production run of vehicles. M103 Heavy Tank, 1950-74 Reviews If you need immediate assistance, please contact Customer Care. The successive versions of the M shared many components with the M47 and M48 Patton tanks and the M60, which, with the exception of the M60 a main battle tank were all considered 90 mm gun medium tanks. It may have been the unwanted 'ugly duckling' of the Army, which refrained from naming the M alone of all its postwar tanks. With over two-thirds of the globe covered by water, the ability to navigate safely and Pricing policy About our prices. Thank you. For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now. Army tank engineering of the late s. Wikimedia Commons has media related to M Heavy tank. Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Commons category link is on Wikidata Use dmy dates from June It was informative and he finished it within a day. For the Marine Corps, it served the purpose defined for it in until the automotive and weapons technology of the United States could produce viable alternatives. Historical Gallery. The tank was designated as M Never rush to the frontlines though, as the M cannot take much punishment - leave that job to tougher heavy tanks like the German E 75 or the Soviet Object In The Spotlight. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy. The M was the last heavy tank to be used by the US military as the concept of the main battle tank evolved, making heavy tanks obsolete.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • M6 Heavy Tank the Newly-Formed Heavy Tank Platoons Are Lieutenant Giving a Good Account of Themselves
    HEAVY TANK PLATOON Lieutenant M6 HEAVY TANK The newly-formed heavy tank platoons are Lieutenant giving a good account of themselves. DEVELOPMENT Heavy Tank Platoons are rated as: Confident Trained At the outbreak of World War II the US Army DESIGN FEATURES possessed few tanks, and no heavy tanks. In OON May 1940 the US Army Ordnance Department When the specifications were laid down PLatooN T for the M6 heavy tank it was normal for Command M6 heavy tank started to work on the T1, 50-ton heavy LA heavy tanks, such as the Soviet T-35, HQ Tank multi-turreted tank. This was similar in 3 M6 heavy tanks ...... 510 points P concept to the Soviet T-35 and other 1930s to follow the ‘land battleship’ model, ‘land battleship’ designs. By October 1940, having multiple turrets mounting a 2 M6 heavy tanks ...... 340 points Sergeant CorporalSergeant the Department reached the same conclusions variety of guns and machine-guns. The 1 M6 heavy tank ....... 170 points of excessive size, difficulty in crew co- T1 heavy tank specification featured a ordination and high production cost that had slightly more modern arrangement with led to the abandonment of the land battleship both of its guns mounted in the same REPLACING StANDARD EQUIPMENT concept in Europe. turret and its twin .50 cal machine- Any US company may replace a Tank Platoon guns in a relatively conventional bow M6 heavy tank M6 heavy tank A new T1 heavy tank design was laid down with mounting. taken as a Support platoon with a Heavy a single turret retaining the mixed armament Tank Platoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Projected Acquisition Costs for the Army's Ground Combat Vehicles
    Projected Acquisition Costs for the Army’s Ground Combat Vehicles © MDart10/Shutterstock.com APRIL | 2021 At a Glance The Army operates a fleet of ground combat vehicles—vehicles intended to conduct combat opera- tions against enemy forces—and plans to continue to do so. Expanding on the Army’s stated plans, the Congressional Budget Office has projected the cost of acquiring such vehicles through 2050. Those projections include costs for research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) and for procurement but not the costs of operating and maintaining the vehicles. CBO’s key findings are as follows: • Total acquisition costs for the Army’s ground combat vehicles are projected to average about $5 billion per year (in 2020 dollars) through 2050—$4.5 billion for procurement and $0.5 billion for RDT&E. • The projected procurement costs are greater (in constant dollars) than the average annual cost for such vehicles from 2010 to 2019 but approximately equal to the average annual cost from 2000 to 2019 (when spending was boosted because of operations in Iraq). • More than 40 percent of the projected acquisition costs of Army ground combat vehicles are for Abrams tanks. • Most of the projected acquisition costs are for remanufactured and upgraded versions of current vehicles, though the Army also plans to acquire an Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle, which will replace the Bradley armored personnel carrier; an Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle, which will replace the M113 armored personnel carrier; and a new Mobile Protected Firepower tank, which will be lighter than an Abrams tank. • The Army is also considering developing an unmanned Decisive Lethality Platform that might eventually replace Abrams tanks.
    [Show full text]
  • Shooting Stars
    US941 A The first sheet in the blister gives you all the different types of Allied stars commonly found on US vehicles. There was no standard way of applying these stars, so feel free to have a mix in your army. The examples below are just a sample of the more common practices in terms of where the stars go, but if you’re looking to represent tanks in a specific historical battle, period photos are your friend. Tanks Tank Destroyers US tanks would typically have six stars: turret sides, hull sides, hull Tank Destroyers usually have the stars in broken circles. Some SHOOTING STARBy Victor Pesch S front, and engine deck. These varied in style. Some would have ba- M18’s had a large star on the front armour. Using Battlefront’s New US Decals sic stars, while others had stars with rings around them. A large star with a ring was often on the engine deck for air recognition. Last month saw the release of Blood, Guts, & Glory, Battlefront’s new intelligence handbook covering the tank battles in the Lorraine, September 1944 - January 1945. Some crew would paint over them later so they didn’t provide easy targets for the Germans, so leaving some off is an easy way To coincide with this release, this month sees the arrival of the new US Decal sheet (UBX941). Victor is going to to add variety to your force. walk us through how to get the most from these sheets and give your armoured force the war paint it deserves. M10 3in GMC Armoured Artillery A similar treatment to the tank destroyer was given to armoured artillery, but they commonly had a large star in a cirle on the side armour where there was room.
    [Show full text]
  • Tank Gunnery
    Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com MHI Copy 3 FM 17-12 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FIELD MANUAL TANK GUNNERY HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NOVEMBER 1964 Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com PREPARE TO FIRE Instructional Card (M41A3, M48, and M60 Tanks) TANK COMMANDER GUNNER DRIVER LOADER Commond: PREPARE TO Observe looder's actionr in Cleon periscopes, Check indicotor tape for FIRE. making check of replenisher in. lower seat, close proper amount of recoil oil Inspect coaxial machine- dicotor tope. Clean nd inspect hoatch, nd turn in replenilher. Check posi- gun ond telescope ports gunner s direct-fire sights. Check on master switch. tion of breechblock crank to ensure gun shield operaoion of sight covers if op. stop. Open breech (assisted cover is correctly posi- cable. Check instrument lights. by gunner); inspect cham- tioned ond clomps are Assist loader in opening breech. ber ond tube, and clote secure. Clean exterior breech. Check coxial lenses and vision devices. mochinegun and adjust and clean ond inspect head space if opplicble. commander's direct-fire Check coaxial machinegun sight(s). Inspect cupolao mount ond odjust solenoid. sowed ammunilion if Inspect turret-stowed am. applicable. munitlon. Command: CHECK FIR- Ploce main gun safety in FIRE Start auxiliary Place moin gun safety ING SWITCHES. position if located on right side engine (moin en- in FIREposition if loated If main gun has percus- of gun. Turn gun switch ON. gin. if tank has on left side of gun. If sion mechanism, cock gun Check firing triggers on power no auxiliary en- moin gun hoaspercussion for eoch firing check if control handle if applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Errors in American Tank Development in World War II Jacob Fox James Madison University
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Spring 2013 The rW ong track: Errors in American tank development in World War II Jacob Fox James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Fox, Jacob, "The rW ong track: Errors in American tank development in World War II" (2013). Masters Theses. 215. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/215 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wrong Track: Errors in American Tank Development in World War II Jacob Fox A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History May 2013 ii Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................... iii Introduction and Historiography ....................................................................... 1 Chapter One: America’s Pre-War tank Policy and Early War Development ....... 19 McNair’s Tank Destroyers Chapter Two: The Sherman on the Battlefield ................................................. 30 Reaction in the Press Chapter Three: Ordnance Department and the T26 ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master's Thesis the M26 Pershing
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY Master’s Thesis The M26 Pershing: America’s Forgotten Tank - Developmental and Combat History Author : Reader : Supervisor : Robert P. Hanger Dr. Christopher J. Smith Dr. David L. Snead A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Arts In the Liberty University Department of History May 11, 2018 Abstract The M26 tank, nicknamed the “General Pershing,” was the final result of the Ordnance Department’s revolutionary T20 series. It was the only American heavy tank to be fielded during the Second World War. Less is known about this tank, mainly because it entered the war too late and in too few numbers to impact events. However, it proved a sufficient design – capable of going toe-to-toe with vaunted German armor. After the war, American tank development slowed and was reduced mostly to modernization of the M26 and component development. The Korean War created a sudden need for armor and provided the impetus for further development. M26s were rushed to the conflict and demonstrated to be decisive against North Korean armor. Nonetheless, the principle role the tank fulfilled was infantry support. In 1951, the M26 was replaced by its improved derivative, the M46. Its final legacy was that of being the foundation of America’s Cold War tank fleet. Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter 1. Development of the T26 …………………………………………………..………..10 Chapter 2. The M26 in Action in World War II …………...…………………………………40 Chapter 3. The Interwar Period ……………………………………………………………….63 Chapter 4. The M26 in Korea ………………………………………………………………….76 The Invasion………………………………………………………...………77 Intervention…………………………………………………………………81 The M26 Enters the War……………………………………………………85 The M26 in the Anti-Tank Role…………………………………………….87 Chapter 5.
    [Show full text]
  • France Historical AFV Register
    France Historical AFV Register Armored Fighting Vehicles Preserved in France Updated 24 July 2016 Pierre-Olivier Buan Neil Baumgardner For the AFV Association 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................4 ALSACE.................................................................................................................5 Bas-Rhin / Lower Rhine (67)........................................................5 Haut-Rhin / Upper Rhine (68)......................................................10 AQUITAINE...........................................................................................................12 Dordogne (24) .............................................................................12 Gironde (33) ................................................................................13 Lot-et-Garonne (47).....................................................................14 AUVERGNE............................................................................................................15 Puy-de-Dôme (63)........................................................................15 BASSE-NORMANDIE / LOWER NORMANDY............................................................16 Calvados (14)...............................................................................16 Manche (50).................................................................................19 Orne (61).....................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • T14 Assault Tank the New T14 Assault Tank Gives British Infantry Tank Battalions Their First 75Mm Gun Tank
    REPLACING StaNdaRD EQUIPMENT IN BRITISH SERVICE T14 ASSAULT TANK The new T14 assault tank gives British infantry tank battalions their first 75mm gun tank. OON Any British company may replace all Infantry Tank Platoons equipped with Churchill tanks with DEVELOPMENT at Assault Tank Platoons. If it is an Infantry Tank Company it must also purchase all tanks in When America entered the war in late 1941 they and the British immediately got together to the Company HQ as T14 assault tanks for 135 points per tank. L consider tank designs. The Americans learned from the British tank combat experience, while the P British examined American tank designs to see how they fit their requirements. Subaltern In September 1941 the British had expressed interest in a heavier tank after their experiences ASSAULT TANK PLatOON NK in the desert and teething problems with their new Churchill tank. At the same time the US The assault tank platoons have won the Subaltern A Ordnance Department had been advocating the adoption of heavier tanks for the US Army. The T14 confidence of the infantry they support. T assault tank was seen as the solution for both these needs. T Assault Tank Platoons are rated as: The US Ordnance Department started design work on a tank that shared many features with the Confident Trained M6 heavy tank, but incorporated British requirements. With design work on the new M4 Sherman UL Command A medium tank nearing completion, the design shared many features of this tank. The new tank had PLatooN T14 assault tank the transmission of the M4 Sherman and the standard Ford GAZ tank engine.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide
    WORLDWIDE EQUIPMENT GUIDE TRADOC DCSINT Threat Support Directorate DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. Worldwide Equipment Guide Sep 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page Memorandum, 24 Sep 2001 ...................................... *i V-150................................................................. 2-12 Introduction ............................................................ *vii VTT-323 ......................................................... 2-12.1 Table: Units of Measure........................................... ix WZ 551........................................................... 2-12.2 Errata Notes................................................................ x YW 531A/531C/Type 63 Vehicle Series........... 2-13 Supplement Page Changes.................................... *xiii YW 531H/Type 85 Vehicle Series ................... 2-14 1. INFANTRY WEAPONS ................................... 1-1 Infantry Fighting Vehicles AMX-10P IFV................................................... 2-15 Small Arms BMD-1 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-17 AK-74 5.45-mm Assault Rifle ............................. 1-3 BMD-3 Airborne Fighting Vehicle.................... 2-19 RPK-74 5.45-mm Light Machinegun................... 1-4 BMP-1 IFV..................................................... 2-20.1 AK-47 7.62-mm Assault Rifle .......................... 1-4.1 BMP-1P IFV...................................................... 2-21 Sniper Rifles.....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving Shock Action: a New Approach to Armored Maneuver Warfare
    Preserving Shock Action: A New Approach to Armored Maneuver Warfare by Lester W. Grau In theory, mechanized infantry, self-propelled artillery, and ar- RPGs. They first destroyed the Russian lead and rear vehicles mored forces are mutually supporting. Artillery rains destruction on the side streets, trapping the unit. The tanks could not lower to the front and flanks as infantry personnel carriers and dis- their gun tubes far enough to shoot into basements or high enough mounted infantry protect tanks from enemy antitank systems and to reach the tops of buildings. Infantry fighting vehicles and per- enemy infantry. Simultaneously, tanks protect the personnel car- sonnel carriers were unable to support their tanks. Chechens sys- riers and dismounted infantry from enemy tanks and strong tematically destroyed the column from above and below with points. In practice, personnel carriers have problems keeping up RPGs and grenades. Other Chechens surrounded the force in with fast-moving tanks, their armor protection is too thin to sur- the train station. The commander of the Russian unit waited un- vive at the point of the attack and battle drills between tanks and til 2 January for reinforcements, but they never arrived. Part of mechanized infantry frequently break down due to the lack of his decimated unit broke out. By 3 January 1995, the brigade had sufficient team training prior to combat. Artillery fire may be on lost nearly 800 men, 20 of its 26 tanks, and 102 of its 120 ar- or off target, or too early or too late. The bottom line is that mored vehicles.2 there is often too great a gap between the tanks and the mecha- nized infantry at the crucial point and artillery may not bridge Several nations have recognized the problem of the tactical gap that gap.
    [Show full text]
  • SPEARPOINT 1943 Starting Deck Suggestions
    FRONTLINE GENERAL TM SPEARPOINT 1943 Starting Deck Suggestions Germany United States “Angriff” (100 pts) “Mobile Firepower” (99 pts) 1x Pz. VI Ausf. E Tiger I (21 pts) 3x M4A1 Sherman (42 pts) 2x Pz. V Ausf. A Panther (36 pts) 2x Gun Motor Carriage M10 (24 pts) 3x Tank Crew (6 pts) 1x M7 Priest (11 pts) 2x Rifle Squad (10 pts) 6x Tank Crew (12 pts) 2x Mortar Squad (10 pts) 2x M1 Bazooka Team (6 pts) 2x MG-42 Team (8 pts) 2x .30cal LMG Team (4 pts) 1x Panzerschreck Team (4 pts) 1x Scharfschütze (Sniper) (5 pts) Strengths: Mobile, powerful anti-tank force. Weaknesses: Weak vs. enemy artillery, if the artillery is Strengths: Armor heavy frontline force. Easy to well-protected. No air support. commit forces. Good infantry support. Suggested Starting Hand: 1x M4A1 Sherman, Weaknesses: No air or artillery support. Weak against 1x M7 Priest, 2x Tank Crew enemy air and artillery attacks. Suggested Starting Hand: 2x Pz. V Panther A, 2x Tank Crew (bring in the big boy later for a guaranteed S “Oh #^$@!” reaction) RCHIVE A AL “Einsatzbereit” (99 pts) N 2x Panzer IV Ausf. G (22 pts) ATIO 2x Tank Crew (4 pts) US N 1x Focke-Wulf Fw190A-4 (9 pts) M10 TANK DESTROYER 1x Luftwaffe Pilot (2 pts) 2x 8.8cm FlaK 36 (12 pts) “Fire for Effect!” (99 pts) 1x Nebelwerfer 41 (4 pts) 3x Artillery Crew (6 pts) 1x 8in Howitzer M1 (9 pts) 3x Rifle Squad (15 pts) 2x 105mm Howitzer M2A1 (8 pts) 3x MG-42 Team (12 pts) 3x Artillery Crew (6 pts) 2x Panzerschreck Team (8 pts) 2x M7 Priest (22 pts) 1x 8cm Mortar Squad (5 pts) 2x M5A1 Stuart VI (14 pts) 4x Tank Crew (8 pts) 2x Rifle Squad (12 pts) Strengths: Good versatile balance of frontline, rear 2x 81mm Mortar Squad (12 pts) line, and air forces.
    [Show full text]
  • United States
    Armies of the united states Written by: Massimo Torriani Translated by: Andrew Carless Edited by: Alessio Cavatore & Rick Priestley Cover Artwork: Peter Dennis Internal Artwork: Peter Dennis & Mike Chappell Photography: Warwick Kinrade, Mark Owen & Paul Sawyer Artefacts: John Stallard collection MiniaturesMiniatures painted by: Neil Burt, Andrés Amián Fernández, SampleDarrenDa rrfileen Linington,Lining Alan Mander, Gary Martin, Bruce Murray & Darius Wyrozebski Thanks to: ChrisChris Allen,Allen, SimonSimonn Bargery, Andrew Chesney, JD Fako, Wojtek Flis, PaulPaul Hicks,Hick David Holmes, Games Korps, David Lawrence, BernardB Lewis, Steve Morgan, Agis Neugebauer, AdeptusAdeptus North Texas, Phoenix Gaming Club, Dean Rapp, JonJon RuRussell,ssell, PaulP Sawyer, Adrian Shepherd and John Stallard, DaneDan Stephens, Jake Thornton, Wyvern Wargamers OSPREYREY PUBLISHINGING ospreypublishing.com 1 warlordgames.com coNTENTS What Is This Book? 5 ANTI-AIRCRAFT GUNS 33 37mm M1A2 Medium Anti-aircraft Gun 33 The American Army Of World War II 7 90mm M2 Dual Purpose AA/AT gun 33 ANTI-TANK GUNS 33 Pearl Harbor 8 37mm Anti-tank gun M3 33 Training And Equipment 8 57mm Anti-tank gun M1 33 Death And Reinforcements 8 3-Inch Anti-tank gun M5 34 Infantry 9 Armour 11 VEHICLES 35 The War 12 TANKS 35 M3 Stuart light tank 35 Army List 17 M3A1 Stuart 36 Reinforced Platoon 19 M3A3 Stuart 36 Army special rules 20 M3A1 with Satan Flamethrower 36 Fire and Manoeuvre 20 M5/M5A1 Stuart 36 Gyro-stabilisers 20 M24 Chaffee Light Tank 37 Air Superiority 20 M3 Lee/Grant Medium Tank
    [Show full text]