DOCSLIB.ORG

Pre AP Biology Week 2 (3/30 – 4/3): Taxonomy & Cells

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pre AP Biology Week 2 (3/30 – 4/3): Taxonomy & Cells Name: ________________________________________ Id#: ____________ Teacher: _________________ Pre AP Biology Week 2 (3/30 – 4/3): Taxonomy & Cells Directions: Required: Read/sing the Taxonomy Song on the front page Answer the following questions. 1) Which of the following accurately lists the levels of classification in our current taxonomic system? a. Phylum, kingdom, domain, class, order, family, genus, species b. Class, domain, kingdom, phylum, order, family, genus, species c. Domain, phylum, kingdom, class, order, family, genus, species d. Domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species 2) Which of the following is the most limiting level of classification of an orga1.nism? a. Class b. Genus c. Order d. Species 3) Which of the following is the least limiting level of classification? a. Class b. Genus c. Order d. Species 4) Which grouping of organisms is considered to have the greatest amount of diversity? a. Kingdom b. Species c. Domain d. Order 5) Which of the following shows the correct scientific name for a fruit fly? a. Drosophila melanogaster b. Drosophila Melanogaster c. Drosophila Melanogaster d. Drosophila melanogaster 6) One type of organism has some photosynthetic members but is primarily unicellular. They do have a true nucleus and organelles. Into which kingdom does this organism most likely belong? a. Protists b. Fungi c. Plantae d. Animalia 7) These organisms are eukaryotic, nearly all are multicellular; they are nonphotosynthetic. To which kingdom do they best fit? a. Protists b. Fungi c. Plantae d. Animalia 8) Which of the letters, shown in the illustrations above, represent the same position in the cladogram as “1”? a. 7 and 8 b. 4 and 8 c. 4 and 7 d. 6 and 8 9) Which of the following organisms are most closely related, based upon these cladograms? a. 1 and 2 b. 4 and 5 c. 7 and 8 d. 5 and 6 10) What is the primary purpose of a phylogenetic tree? a. The primary purpose of a phylogenetic tree is to be able to develop species and genus names of new discovered organisms. b. The primary purpose of a phylogenetic tree is to be able to trace evolutionary relationships amongst organisms. c. The primary purpose of a phylogenetic tree is to be able to determine which organisms are more advanced than theirs. d. The primary purpose of a phylogenetic tree is to be able to determine into which kingdom a living organism belongs. Of the four options below, choose THREE to complete by Friday, April 3. 1. Create flashcards for the following terms: domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species, and taxonomy, binomial nomenclature. Each flashcard must have a definition, a picture, and an example. 2. Compose your own song or rap for taxonomy and classification. Choose your favorite song or beat, and create your own science lyrics for it! 3. Create a venn diagram comparing and contrasting plant and animal cells. Also draw diagrams of a plant and animal cell with labels and descriptions of each organelle. 4. For each of the following, use the dichotomous key to figure out the name of the organism. Name: ________________________________________ Id#: ____________ Teacher: _________________ Pre AP Biology Week 2: Classification & Taxonomy Rap There are millions and millions of species, (That's a lot.) Of living things, from bald eagles to seaweed. (Wow.) Each year we find plenty more, (Oh really?) High up in the jungle canopy or on the ocean floor. We organize and classify them all, Based on similarities and how they evolved. (Changed over time.) When you group and name things, that's taxonomy, There are eight levels, just follow me. There are three domains up at the top, And six kingdoms come next, it don't stop. Then phylum, class, order, family, genus, species, “I have no idea what you're talking about.” Well, you see, we give Latin names to everything that's alive, “Like Roberto?” Nah, not quite. Humans are Homo sapiens, that's the Latin name, Let's classify a human now, I can explain. First our domain, it's Eukarya, All plants and animals, no we're not bacteria. (Thank goodness.) Our kingdom's Animalia, you can guess, That's animals, so plants just step to the left. (I hate plants.) Our phylum is Chordata, yep, And that includes everything with a spinal cord in its back. Class is Mammalia, a mammal yeah, 'Cause we feed babies milk, we breathe the air. Our order must be Primates, That includes lemurs, baboons and the great apes. Our family is Hominidae, That includes gorillas and the chimpanzees. Genus is Homo, which is Latin for human, But it includes Lucy too, now we're zooming. To the species, in that we're sapiens, Which means “wise” in Latin, let me say again… Domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species last. (x2) We classify living things into groups, Learn a little Latin, get to know the truth. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liliaceae S.L. (Lily Family)
    Liliaceae s.l. (Lily family) Photo: Ben Legler Photo: Hannah Marx Photo: Hannah Marx Lilium columbianum Xerophyllum tenax Trillium ovatum Liliaceae s.l. (Lily family) Photo: Yaowu Yuan Fritillaria lanceolata Ref.1 Textbook DVD KRR&DLN Erythronium americanum Allium vineale Liliaceae s.l. (Lily family) Herbs; Ref.2 Stems often modified as underground rhizomes, corms, or bulbs; Flowers actinomorphic; 3 sepals and 3 petals or 6 tepals, 6 stamens, 3 carpels, ovary superior (or inferior). Tulipa gesneriana Liliaceae s.l. (Lily family) “Liliaceae” s.l. (sensu lato: “in the broad sense”) - Lily family; 288 genera/4950 species, including Lilium, Allium, Trillium, Tulipa; This family is treated in a very broad sense in this class, as in the Flora of the Pacific Northwest. The “Liliaceae” s.l. taught in this class is not monophyletic. It is apparent now that the family should be treated in a narrower sense and some of the members should form their own families. Judd et al. recognize 15+ families: Agavaceae, Alliaceae, Amarylidaceae, Asparagaceae, Asphodelaceae, Colchicaceae, Dracaenaceae (Nolinaceae), Hyacinthaceae, Liliaceae, Melanthiaceae, Ruscaceae, Smilacaceae, Themidaceae, Trilliaceae, Uvulariaceae and more!!! (see web reading “Consider the Lilies”) Iridaceae (Iris family) Photo: Hannah Marx Photo: Hannah Marx Iris pseudacorus Iridaceae (Iris family) Photo: Yaowu Yuan Photo: Yaowu Yuan Sisyrinchium douglasii Sisyrinchium sp. Iridaceae (Iris family) Iridaceae - 78 genera/1750 species, Including Iris, Gladiolus, Sisyrinchium. Herbs, aquatic or terrestrial; Underground stems as rhizomes, bulbs, or corms; Leaves alternate, 2-ranked and equitant Ref.3 (oriented edgewise to the stem; Gladiolus italicus Flowers actinomorphic or zygomorphic; 3 sepals and 3 petals or 6 tepals; Stamens 3; Ovary of 3 fused carpels, inferior.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Mega-Diverse Genus Ocyptamus (Diptera, Syrphidae) Monophyletic
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62 (2012) 191–205 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Is the mega-diverse genus Ocyptamus (Diptera, Syrphidae) monophyletic? Evidence from molecular characters including the secondary structure of 28S rRNA ⇑ Ximo Mengual a,c, , Gunilla Ståhls b, Santos Rojo c a Dept. of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC-0169, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA b Zoological Unit, Finnish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 17, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland c Instituto Universitario CIBIO – Dpto. de Ciencias Ambientales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Alicante, Apdo. 99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain article info abstract Article history: Phylogenetic relationships between two New World Syrphinae taxa (Diptera, Syrphidae), i.e. the highly Received 17 March 2011 diverse genus Ocyptamus and the large genus Toxomerus, were analysed based on molecular characters. Revised 17 August 2011 The monophyly of both taxa was tested and the taxonomic status of included subgenera and species Accepted 23 September 2011 groups was examined. Toxomerus constitutes the monogeneric tribe Toxomerini with more than 140 Available online 29 September 2011 described species, while Ocyptamus (tribe Syrphini) is a very diverse genus (over 300 spp.) with multiple recognised subgenera and species groups. Sequence data from three gene regions were used: the mito- Keywords: chondrial protein-coding gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and the nuclear 28S and 18S ribo- Toxomerus somal RNA genes. The secondary structure of two expansion segments (D2, D3) of the ribosomal 28S Ocyptamus Monophyly RNA gene is presented for the family Syrphidae and used for the first time in a multiple sequence align- Syrphidae ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Insecticidal Activity of Benzylisoquinoline Alkaloids From
    molecules Article Assessment of Insecticidal Activity of Benzylisoquinoline Alkaloids from Chilean Rhamnaceae Plants against Fruit-Fly Drosophila melanogaster and the Lepidopteran Crop Pest Cydia pomonella Soledad Quiroz-Carreño 1, Edgar Pastene-Navarrete 1 , Cesar Espinoza-Pinochet 2, Evelyn Muñoz-Núñez 1, Luis Devotto-Moreno 3, Carlos L. Céspedes-Acuña 1 and Julio Alarcón-Enos 1,* 1 Laboratorio de Síntesis y Biotransformación de Productos Naturales, Dpto. Ciencias Básicas, Universidad del Bio-Bio, PC3780000 Chillán, Chile; [email protected] (S.Q.-C.); [email protected] (E.P.-N.); [email protected] (E.M.-N.); [email protected] (C.L.C.-A.) 2 Dpto. Agroindustria, Facultad de Ingeniería Agrícola, Universidad de Concepción, 3780000 Chillán, Chile; [email protected] 3 Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA Quilamapu, 3780000 Chillán, Chile; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Academic Editors: Daniel Granato and Petri Kilpeläinen Received: 29 September 2020; Accepted: 27 October 2020; Published: 3 November 2020 Abstract: The Chilean plants Discaria chacaye, Talguenea quinquenervia (Rhamnaceae), Peumus boldus (Monimiaceae), and Cryptocarya alba (Lauraceae) were evaluated against Codling moth: Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae), which is one of the most widespread and destructive primary pests of Prunus (plums, cherries, peaches, nectarines, apricots, almonds), pear, walnuts, and chestnuts, among other. Four benzylisoquinoline alkaloids (coclaurine, laurolitsine, boldine, and pukateine) were isolated from the above mentioned plant species and evaluated regarding their insecticidal activity against the codling moth and fruit fly. The results showed that these alkaloids possess acute and chronic insecticidal effects. The most relevant effect was observed at 10 µg/mL against D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Marking Methodology on Mate Choice in Drosophila Melanogaster
    ABC 2020, 7(4):492-504 Animal Behavior and Cognition DOI: https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.07.04.02.2020 ©Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) PREREGISTERED REPORT The Effects of Marking Methodology on Mate Choice in Drosophila melanogaster Eirlys E. Tysall1, Matilda Q. R. Pembury Smith1*, and R. Tucker Gilman2 1Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester 2Faculty of Science and Engineering; University of Manchester *Corresponding author (Email: [email protected]) Citation – Tysall, E. E., Pembury Smith, M. Q. R., & Gilman, R. T. (2020). The effects of marking methodology on mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 7(4), 492-504. doi: https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.07.04.02.2020 Note: This paper is the final report based on an accepted peer-reviewed preregistered submission that can be found here. Abstract – Mate choice is an important source of sexual selection and a key driver of evolutionary processes including adaptation and speciation. Drosophila species have become an important model system for studying mate choice in the lab. Mate choice experiments often require the marking of individual flies to make those flies identifiable to experimenters, and several marking methods have been developed. All of these methods have the potential to affect mating behavior, but the effects of different marking methods have not been systematically quantified and compared. In this experiment, we quantified and compared the effects of five marking methods commonly used for Drosophila melanogaster: wing clipping, applying paint to the thorax, applying marker pen to the wing, dusting flies with fluorescent powder, and dyeing flies by allowing them to ingest food coloring.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Regulation of the Expression of Amaryllidaceae Alkaloid Biosynthetic Genes in Narcissus Papyraceus
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Developmental Regulation of the Expression of Amaryllidaceae Alkaloid Biosynthetic Genes in Narcissus papyraceus Tarun Hotchandani 1, Justine de Villers 1 and Isabel Desgagné-Penix 1,2,* 1 Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Physics, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351 boulevard des Forges, Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada 2 Plant Biology Research Group, Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-819-376-5011 Received: 6 July 2019; Accepted: 5 August 2019; Published: 7 August 2019 Abstract: Amaryllidaceae alkaloids (AAs) have multiple biological effects, which are of interest to the pharmaceutical industry. To unleash the potential of Amaryllidaceae plants as pharmaceutical crops and as sources of AAs, a thorough understanding of the AA biosynthetic pathway is needed. However, only few enzymes in the pathway are known. Here, we report the transcriptome of AA-producing paperwhites (Narcissus papyraceus Ker Gawl). We present a list of 21 genes putatively encoding enzymes involved in AA biosynthesis. Next, a cDNA library was created from 24 different samples of different parts at various developmental stages of N. papyraceus. The expression of AA biosynthetic genes was analyzed in each sample using RT-qPCR. In addition, the alkaloid content of each sample was analyzed by HPLC. Leaves and flowers were found to have the highest abundance of heterocyclic compounds, whereas the bulb, the lowest. Lycorine was also the predominant AA. The gene expression results were compared with the heterocyclic compound profiles for each sample. In some samples, a positive correlation was observed between the gene expression levels and the amount of compounds accumulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy and Go Fish! Background
    Anatomy and Go Fish! Background Introduction It is important to properly identify fi sh for many reasons: to follow the rules and regulations, for protection against sharp teeth or protruding spines, for the safety of the fi sh, and for consumption or eating purposes. When identifying fi sh, scientists and anglers use specifi c vocabulary to describe external or outside body parts. These body parts are common to most fi sh. The difference in the body parts is what helps distinguish one fi sh from another, while their similarities are used to classify them into groups. There are approximately 29,000 fi sh species in the world. In order to identify each type of fi sh, scientists have grouped them according to their outside body parts, specifi cally the number and location of fi ns, and body shape. Classifi cation Using a system of classifi cation, scientists arrange all organisms into groups based on their similarities. The fi rst system of classifi cation was proposed in 1753 by Carolus Linnaeus. Linnaeus believed that each organism should have a binomial name, genus and species, with species being the smallest organization unit of life. Using Linnaeus’ system as a guide, scientists created a hierarchical system known as taxonomic classifi cation, in which organisms are classifi ed into groups based on their similarities. This hierarchical system moves from largest and most general to smallest and most specifi c: kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species. {See Figure 1. Taxonomic Classifi cation Pyramid}. For example, fi sh belong to the kingdom Animalia, the phylum Chordata, and from there are grouped more specifi cally into several classes, orders, families, and thousands of genus and species.
    [Show full text]
  • Liliaceae Lily Family
    Liliaceae lily family While there is much compelling evidence available to divide this polyphyletic family into as many as 25 families, the older classification sensu Cronquist is retained here. Page | 1222 Many are familiar as garden ornamentals and food plants such as onion, garlic, tulip and lily. The flowers are showy and mostly regular, three-merous and with a superior ovary. Key to genera A. Leaves mostly basal. B B. Flowers orange; 8–11cm long. Hemerocallis bb. Flowers not orange, much smaller. C C. Flowers solitary. Erythronium cc. Flowers several to many. D D. Leaves linear, or, absent at flowering time. E E. Flowers in an umbel, terminal, numerous; leaves Allium absent. ee. Flowers in an open cluster, or dense raceme. F F. Leaves with white stripe on midrib; flowers Ornithogalum white, 2–8 on long peduncles. ff. Leaves green; flowers greenish, in dense Triantha racemes on very short peduncles. dd. Leaves oval to elliptic, present at flowering. G G. Flowers in an umbel, 3–6, yellow. Clintonia gg. Flowers in a one-sided raceme, white. Convallaria aa. Leaves mostly cauline. H H. Leaves in one or more whorls. I I. Leaves in numerous whorls; flowers >4cm in diameter. Lilium ii. Leaves in 1–2 whorls; flowers much smaller. J J. Leaves 3 in a single whorl; flowers white or purple. Trillium jj. Leaves in 2 whorls, or 5–9 leaves; flowers yellow, small. Medeola hh. Leaves alternate. K K. Flowers numerous in a terminal inflorescence. L L. Plants delicate, glabrous; leaves 1–2 petiolate. Maianthemum ll. Plant coarse, robust; stems pubescent; leaves many, clasping Veratrum stem.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoverflies Family: Syrphidae
    Birmingham & Black Country SPECIES ATLAS SERIES Hoverflies Family: Syrphidae Andy Slater Produced by EcoRecord Introduction Hoverflies are members of the Syrphidae family in the very large insect order Diptera ('true flies'). There are around 283 species of hoverfly found in the British Isles, and 176 of these have been recorded in Birmingham and the Black Country. This atlas contains tetrad maps of all of the species recorded in our area based on records held on the EcoRecord database. The records cover the period up to the end of 2019. Myathropa florea Cover image: Chrysotoxum festivum All illustrations and photos by Andy Slater All maps contain Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database right 2020 Hoverflies Hoverflies are amongst the most colourful and charismatic insects that you might spot in your garden. They truly can be considered the gardener’s fiend as not only are they important pollinators but the larva of many species also help to control aphids! Great places to spot hoverflies are in flowery meadows on flowers such as knapweed, buttercup, hogweed or yarrow or in gardens on plants such as Canadian goldenrod, hebe or buddleia. Quite a few species are instantly recognisable while the appearance of some other species might make you doubt that it is even a hoverfly… Mimicry Many hoverfly species are excellent mimics of bees and wasps, imitating not only their colouring, but also often their shape and behaviour. Sometimes they do this to fool the bees and wasps so they can enter their nests to lay their eggs. Most species however are probably trying to fool potential predators into thinking that they are a hazardous species with a sting or foul taste, even though they are in fact harmless and perfectly edible.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae) Richness and Abundance Vary with Forest Stand Heterogeneity: Preliminary Evidence from a Montane Beech Fir Forest
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(4): 755–769, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.083 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae) richness and abundance vary with forest stand heterogeneity: Preliminary evidence from a montane beech fir forest LAURENT LARRIEU 1, 2, ALAIN CABANETTES 1 and JEAN-PIERRE SARTHOU 3, 4 1 INRA, UMR1201 DYNAFOR, Chemin de Borde Rouge, Auzeville Tolosane, CS 52627, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] ² CNPF/ IDF, Antenne de Toulouse, 7 chemin de la Lacade, F-31320 Auzeville Tolosane, France 3 INRA, UMR 1248 AGIR, Chemin de Borde Rouge, Auzeville Tolosane, CS 52627, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France; e-mail: [email protected] 4 University of Toulouse, INP-ENSAT, Avenue de l’Agrobiopôle, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France Key words. Diptera, Syrphidae, Abies alba, deadwood, Fagus silvatica, functional diversity, tree-microhabitats, stand heterogeneity Abstract. Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) provide crucial ecological services and are increasingly used as bioindicators in environ- mental assessment studies. Information is available for a wide range of life history traits at the species level for most Syrphidae but little is recorded about the environmental requirements of forest hoverflies at the stand scale. The aim of this study was to explore whether the structural heterogeneity of a stand influences species richness or abundance of hoverflies in a montane beech-fir forest. We used the catches of Malaise traps set in 2004 and 2007 in three stands in the French Pyrenees, selected to represent a wide range of structural heterogeneity in terms of their vertical structure, tree diversity, deadwood and tree-microhabitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Botany for the Herbalist Common Plant Families 7Song, Director Northeast School of Botanical Medicine 7Song.Com
    Botany for the Herbalist Common Plant Families 7Song, Director Northeast School of Botanical Medicine 7Song.com This handout describes common plant families in the US and Canada. Each family segment contains general characteristics of the family as well as some of the more commonly known species within. In some families such as the Liliaceae, the genera of the plants are still in transition and being placed in newly created families. In other families such as the Scrophulariaceae, some of the former genera have been placed into different already existing families. Within this handout they are generally kept in the older family grouping with the new family identified next to the genus. Field botany is the study of identifying plants and grouping them into categories based on shared anatomical characteristics. Much of this is based on their reproductive parts, especially their flowers. One of the most useful starting points to identify specific plants in the field is by knowing their plant families. Families are a useful category to understand, as plants within them may share obvious traits both botanical (anatomical similarities) and other qualities such as aromatics. As far as medicinal characteristics within a family, there are generally more exceptions to shared traits than similarities in uses. An example showing both sides this is the Apiaceae. This family includes many aromatic, flavorful plants such as Dill, Fennel, and Angelica but also Poison hemlock (Conium), a notoriously poisonous plant. Another example is the Liliaceae with edible foods such as garlic, onion and asparagus but also the toxic Veratrum and Lily-of-the-valley (Convallaria).
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Hover Flies (Diptera, Syrphidae) from Ukraine
    Zoodiversity, 54(1):17–30, 2020 DOI 10.15407/zoo2020.01.017 UDC 595.773.1(477) NEW RECORDS OF HOVER FLIES (DIPTERA, SYRPHIDAE) FROM UKRAINE. IV A. V. Prokhorov1, G. V. Popov2, V. Yu. Shparyk3 1, 2Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, NAS of Ukraine vul. B. Khmelnytskogo, 15, Kyiv, 01030 Ukraine 3Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University vul. T. Shevchenko, 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018 Ukraine 1E-mail: [email protected] 2E-mail: [email protected] 3E-mail: [email protected] New Records of Hover fl ies (Diptera, Syrphidae) from Ukraine. IV. Prokhorov, A. V., Popov, G. V., Shparyk, V. Yu. — Six additional species of hover fl ies of the subfamily Eristalinae are recorded from Ukraine for the fi rst time: Criorhina pachymera Egger, 1858, Hammerschmidtia ferruginea (Fallén, 1817), Melanogaster parumplicata (Loew, 1840), Orthonevra erythrogona (Malm, 1863), Sphiximorpha garibaldii Rondani, 1860, and Temnostoma angustistriatum Krivosheina, 2002. Distributions of these species are summarized and species diagnoses are provided. Updated key to males of the European species of the genus Melanogaster including a little-known M. jaroslavensis (Stackelberg, 1922) is proposed. Key words: fl ower fl ies, Criorhina, Hammerschmidtia, Melanogaster, Orthonevra, Sphiximorpha, Temnostoma, new records, Ukraine. Introduction Hammerschmidtia Schummel, 1834 is the last addition to the list of hover fl y genera of Ukraine, currently with 83 genera. In Europe, this genus is represented by two species, one of which, H. ingrica Stackelberg, 1952, was recorded in Europe only from the northeastern parts (Finland and Russia). Th e second species, H. ferru- ginea (Fallén, 1817), is widespread in Europe (Speight, 2018), but rare and local in many habitats (Rotheray et al., 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Foxb, a New and Highly Conserved Key Factor in Arthropod Dorsal–Ventral (DV) Limb Patterning
    Heingård et al. EvoDevo (2019) 10:28 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13227-019-0141-6 EvoDevo RESEARCH Open Access FoxB, a new and highly conserved key factor in arthropod dorsal–ventral (DV) limb patterning Miriam Heingård1,4, Natascha Turetzek2,3, Nikola‑Michael Prpic2,5 and Ralf Janssen1* Abstract Forkhead box (Fox) transcription factors evolved early in animal evolution and represent important components of conserved gene regulatory networks (GRNs) during animal development. Most of the researches concerning Fox genes, however, are on vertebrates and only a relatively low number of studies investigate Fox gene function in invertebrates. In addition to this shortcoming, the focus of attention is often restricted to a few well‑characterized Fox genes such as FoxA (forkhead), FoxC (crocodile) and FoxQ2. Although arthropods represent the largest and most diverse animal group, most other Fox genes have not been investigated in detail, not even in the arthropod model species Drosophila melanogaster. In a general gene expression pattern screen for panarthropod Fox genes including the red four beetle Tribolium castaneum, the pill millipede Glomeris marginata, the common house spider Parastea- toda tepidariorum, and the velvet worm Euperipatoides kanangrensis, we identifed a Fox gene with a highly conserved expression pattern along the ventral ectoderm of arthropod and onychophoran limbs. Functional investigation of FoxB in Parasteatoda reveals a hitherto unrecognized important function of FoxB upstream of wingless (wg) and decap- entaplegic (dpp) in the GRN orchestrating dorsal–ventral limb patterning. Keywords: Appendage patterning, Forkhead domain, Limb segmentation, Development Introduction the morphogens Dpp and Wg are also involved in the Arthropod limbs develop along three diferent axes, the determination of the DV axis [20–22].
    [Show full text]