Swedish-German Contacts in the Field of Anatomy 1930-1950
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Annals of Anatomy 1% (2014) 2597267 Annals of Mu. 1 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect ANATOMY Annals of Anatomy ELSEWER journal homepage: WWW.e|seVier.de/aanat Research article Swedish—German contacts in the field of anatomy 1930—1950: Gosta ® CtossMaIk Haggqvist and Hermann Stieve Nils l—lansson“, Sabine l-lildebrandtb 3 Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Gh'tzingen, Germany b Boston Children's Hospital, Haward Medical School, Boston, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: This study presents a first exploration of SwedishrGerman contacts in the field of anatomy between 1930 Received 20 February 2014 and 1950, a subject ofresearch that has only recently come into focus. Based on the background ofthe gen— Received in revised form 19 May 2014 eral cultural and scientific exchange between Sweden and Germany and the biographies of the Swedish Accepted 19 May 2014 anatomist Gfista Haggqvist (189171972) and his German colleague Hermann Stieve (188671952), this study identifies specific areas of collaboration between ahatornists of the two countries. These include Keywords: mutual professional career advancement, publication of research results, the exchange of technological History of anatomy Costa Haggqvist expertise and transfer of anatomical specimens. The investigation also examines the use of “material" Hermann Stieve from executed persons in Sweden and Germany as well as public postwar critiques of this practice. Open National Socialism research questions on SwedisheGerman interactions in anatomy during this time period are formulated. Research contacts Sweden»Germany The contacts between Haggqvist and Stieve give insight into the impact of scientific collaborations and Work with bodies of the executed controversial political liaisons in the relationship between Swedish and German science in recent histow. Victims of National Socialism The study is based on documents from German and Swedish archives, including Nobel Prize nominations and reports from the Nobel Archive for Physiology or Medicine in Stockholm. © 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights resen/ed. 1. Introduction Socialist ideology and his commitment to spreading National Socialist propaganda in Sweden. He also maintained close con— The history of anatomy in National Socialism has only become tacts to medical representatives of the “Third Reich" and his a focus of systematic research in the last decade (Hildebrandt German colleagues, particularly Hermann Stieve (Hansson, 2013). and Redies, 2012). One thus far neglected aspect relates to sci— This investigation takes a first look at the cooperation between entific contacts during the National Socialist period between anatomists in National Socialist (NS) Germany and their colleagues German anatomists and their colleagues in officially politically in officially politically neutral countries in the years from 1930 neutral countries like Sweden. During the 19305, academic con— to 1950. Based on the background of the general cultural and tacts between Sweden and Germany were supported by several scientific exchange between Sweden and Germany and the biogra— so—called German—friendly organizations. However, the German— phies of Haggqvist and Stieve, this study identifies specific areas Swedish interactions in medicine between 1933 and 1945 have not of collaboration between anatomists of the two countries These been thoroughly investigated, despite the fact that physicians made include mutual professional career advancement, publication of up a large part ofthe membership of National Socialist associations research results, the exchange oftechnological expertise and trans— in Sweden. fer of anatomical specimens. The investigation also examines the The Stockholm anatomist Costa l—lia'ggqvist was one of the most available evidence concerning the use of “material” from executed influential Swedish anatomists and histologists during the first persons in Sweden and Germany as well as public postwar critiques half of the 20th century. He has remained a subject of contro— of this practice Finally, open research questions are formulated on versy because of his outspokenly friendly attitude toward National Swedish—German interactions in the field of anatomy during this time period * Corresponding author at: University Medical Center. Department of Medical 2. Material Ethics and History of Medicine, Humboldtallee 36, 37073 Gottingen. Germany. Tel.: +49 055139 4185. E—mail addresses: Nils.l—[email protected]—goettingen.de, This study is based on sources from archives in Germany [email protected] (N. Hansson). and Sweden Documents relating to Haggqvist and Stieve have http:[/dx.(loi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2014.05.037 0940-9602/© 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. 260 N. Hanssan, S. Hildebrandt/Annals ofAnutnmy 196 (2014) 259467 been collected from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences llli Abti, Rep. 86A, Nri 217)i Nevertheless, Haggqvist was among Archive in Stockholm, the Greifswald University Archive, the those international anatomists who continued their contacts with Leopoldina German National Academy of Sciences in Halle/Saale, German colleagues after the war (Hildebrandt, 2013a) and was a t e lVlax—Plaan—Archive in Berlin—Dahlem, and the Bayerische member of the board of directors of the Anatomische Gesellschaft Hauptstaatsarchiv (Bavarian Central State Archive). In addition, from 1954 to 1958 (Watzka arid Voss,1957). information was gathered from memoirs of Haggqvist and Stieve‘s While only a few Swedish physicians openly criticized the Hitler colleagues, obituaries and Swedish and German daily press from regime or the actions of the National Socialist German Physi— t e 1 9405 and 1 95051Anotherinsightinto the relationship between cians’ Federation (NSDAB), there was also only a small number of German and Swedish scientists in the first half ofthe 20th century is them who unreservedly supported Adolf Hitler. The German lega— provided by documents from the Nobel archives in Stockholm. The tion in Stockholm kept a list of Swedes with a positive attitude Nobel archive for Physiology or Medicine (NA) holds correspon— toward National Socialism (Almgren, 2005) Among these were ence, reports and nominations of senior and junior physicians Gosta Haggqvist and the pathologist Folke Henschen (1881—1977), from around the world and therefore offers an exclusive view of who were both members of so—called Pro—German associations Nobel Prize nominators and candidates in the field of anatomy. His— before and during the Second World Wari l—liiggqvist was a member torians are given access to the yearbooks fifty years after the year of one of the main Swedish organizations that supported NS ideol— of nomination. This source has not previously been examined for ogy, the Riksfiireningen Sverige—Tyskland (RST, national association t e purpose of shedding light on the history of anatomy, although Sweden—Germany) and several other related Swedish—German in recent decades it has gained scholarly attention among med— societies ical historians (for example Luttenberger, 1996; Crawford, 2002; The RST was founded in 1937 with a proclamation that was Nori‘by, 2010) The Nobel Prize nominations are ofinterest as they signed by more than 400 persons, among them 40 physicians Its i lustrate personal connections in the scientific community among purpose was to evaluate and eventually support the ideology of NS leading anatomists. Germany and to promote National Socialist ideas within Sweden. During its most active period from 1938 to 1943, RST had about 5600 members, of whom nearly 200 were physicians (Hansson 3. General history of Swedish—German contacts in anatomy and Nilsson, 2007). The RST published a periodical paper with 1930—1950 articles ranging in topic from themes related to German culture and politics to commentaries on war eventsi Prominent members Earlier research has shown that officials in NS Germany actively of the RST, among them l—liiggqvist, protested in December 1939 worked to establish and uphold good contacts with prominent against NS Germany’s lack of support for Finland’s struggle against Swedes in the fields ofculture,journalism and education (Almgi‘en, the Soviet invasion during the so—called Finnish Winter War in 2005) This policy included physicians and anatomists, however, 1939/1940 and argued for a temporary break with Germany As a the specific interactions between anatomists of the two coun— result, some members chose to leave the association (Hansson and tries have not been explored For centuries, Swedish physicians Nilsson, 2007). Despite these incidents, the association grew sig— had been influenced by medical progress in Germany, thus, the nificantly between 1941 and 1943. In 1942, RST published a book fact that interest in German medicine and science continued to on German—Swedish relations, for which Héggqvist contributed be widespread in Sweden during the first decades of the 20th an article on the “productive" cooperation between German and century is not surprising. Many Swedish physicians traveled to Swedish anatomists by portraying anatomists like Robert Remak Germany for the purpose of studying there, and they wrote sci— (1815—1865) and Stieve (Haggqvist, 1942) Some of the RST— entific articles and dissertations in German Among those were physicians were also members of the lVlanhem Society (Samfundet the renowned Swedish anatomists Gustaf Retzius (1842—1919) Manhem) It was founded in 1934 to promote studies in Nordic and Carl Magnus F'Lirst (1854—1935), who both became honorary