Download Original 9.85 MB

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Original 9.85 MB ; THE SOUTHERN PLATFORM OR, MANUAL OF SOUTHERN SENTIMENT OX THE SUBJECT OF SLAVERY. BY DANIEL R. GOODLOE, BOSTON. JOHN P. JEWETT & CO , PUBLISHERS. 1858. From among the many highly commendatory notices of this work, we select the following : — From Hon. CJiarhs Sumner. Washington, April 9, 1858. My Dear Sir: — Your little book of Southern Sentiment on the Subject of Slavery^^'' is a most useful, interesting and inspiring compend of opinion, uttered by good men at the South, against a great wrong. I thank you for compiling it; and deplore, more than ever, the sectional madness, which rejects this most conclusive testimony. Every word of your publication ought to be proclaimed and repeated, with the voice of a trumpet. Believe me, Dear Sir, very faithfully Yours, Charles Sumner. Daniel R. Goodloe. From Hon. William Blair, Silver Spring, April 29, 1858. Daniel R. Goodloe, Esq., Dear Sir : — I have seen your collection of the opinions of the public men, in the South, who established our government — touching the subject of Slavery — and unite with many of the friends of free labor, in considering it a most valuable compilation ; and well calculated to influence the action of the nation, on the momentous question, which now seems to be paramount to all others, in controlling the future ten- dency of our political Institutions. I think you should call it " The Southern Republican Platform," — as distinguishing that of the fathers of the Government, from that now set up by the dominant Southern oligarchy. Yours Truly, William Blair. From Hon. Messrs. Wilson and Hale. Washington, April 29, 1858. Daniel R. Goodloe, Esq., Dear Sir : — We have examined, with care, your compilation, en- titled, " The Southern Platform," — being a collection of the expressions of Southern opinion against slavery, commencing with the Revolution, and continued to recent times. It exhibits great research and thor- oughness, and deserves to have an extensive circulation, north and south. It proves, most conclusively, that opposition to slavery, now said to be sectional, was once national. Your work, valuable for everybody, w^e shall esteem especially val- uable, as a reference book, for editors, and for those who are in the habit of addressing the people upon political subjects. Very Truly, your Friends, Henry Wilj^on-, John P. Hale. THE SOUTHERN PLATFORM: » OR, MANUAL OF SOUTHERN SENTIMENT ON THE SUBJECT OF SLAYERY. BY DAKIEL R. GOODLOE. BOSTON. JOHJT p. JEWETT & CO., PUBLISHERS. 1858. PRE F j^o E. In the compilation of this volume, I have attempted to bring together all that the most eminent Southern Revoluii )nary c leli in haracters hnve us their writings, upon th- «ubj 'ct of f^lavery. It will b seen that their testimony is rilmost unanimous against the institution. The leading miiuls of the South, except those of South Caroli 'a and G^orsiin, w^rp not less impressed witu the evils «,f Slavery— moral, economical, and • olitical— those th^ iV than of nn. Indeed, the most ultra Anti-Slavery views which this volume will be found to contain are those ^f Mr. JeffV^rs^n. In ihe Federal Convention which fram 'd the Constitu ion. not a voice was raised in unqualified de ence and junification ' f S avery. for even the members from South Carolina only apologized for the institution; while tho«e from Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina, either openly denounced it as criminal and disgraceful, or freely admitted its evils In the Stale Conven ions, Slavery was 'reated with equal disfavor. In those of Virginia and North Carolina, it was renrobated byFed -ralists and Anti-Federalists— by the friends and the enemies of the Constitution. Patrick < Hetiry and George iWason were not l<»'=s l.'ud i their denunciations of Slavery, than Madison, Edmund Randolph, and Pendleton. In the North Carolina Couveniions, the leading characters were equally emphatic in condemning it. The<e invilnable testimonies against Slavery, coming from the highest Southern authorities, will be treasurpd up by Anti-Slavf-ry men, as indubitable proof of the justice of their cause. But I apprtheiid that many will feel regret and disappoiniment on finding that the same great men who reprobated Slavery as a, unmiti- gated evil, were no less strenuous in shielding it from the i,,tetference of the Federal Government, than its avowed advoc Ues I p'^ofess to s^t forth the views of the men of the Revolution upon the question of Slavery and I must do so fair'y and impartially; and, to this end, I have taken nearly every pas'age from the Madison Papers and Ellioii's Debates, in the Federal and State Conveniions, which relate to the subjec;, with extended extracts from the Debates in Congress during the Administration of General Washington. To denounce Slavery in one breath, and to insist upon ( onstimtional guarantees for its maintenance in the next, may seem inconsistent to the minds of ardent Anti-Slavery men of the present day; but they should recollect that the whole que-^tion of State Rights is involved in this one of Slavery, and that to surrender the sovereignty of the States in this instance, is to open the way to consolidation And, further, allowing Slavery to be an unmitigated evil, as the people of the South generally did at that time, they justly regarded themselves as better qualified o Hpply the remedy than the people of distant States, who were not particularly interested in the matter. I think that reasonable Anti-Slavery men, upon cool reflection, will concede this point. My object in making this publication is not to produce sectional feeling, but to awaken in Southern minds those noble and generous sentiments of freedom wliich animated their ancestors. When the American people emerged from the war of the Revolution, their commerce and agriculture were in a state of ruin; and the Federation, the States, a id individuals, were overwhelmed with debt. It required great faith in the success of the Republican experiment they were making, to foresee the period when these acjumuiated embarrassments would be removed. All thnt could be hoped, for many year', was that the Gov- ernment would be able to meet existing and ordinarily accruing demands upon its CAchcquer, without incurring further obligations. The patriots of that day, therefore, with every disposition to carry out their principles of freedom and equality to their legitimate results, thought it utterly impracticable to do so. They were induced to adjourn the question of Emancipation to a future day. They anxiously and hopefully looked forward to the period when they could remove what they denominated the "foul blot" of Slavery. This idea pervades the writings of all the great and good men of that time, as this volume abundantly demonstrates. It is worthy of remark, that at the Revolutionary era, Pennsylvania was a slaveholding State, and conse- quently the views of Dr. Franklin, Gouverneur Morris, and Mr W ilson, are properly classed with those ( f ash- ington. Jefferson, and Madison. New York was also a slave Siate at that period, but sbe was represented in the Feder^l Convention but a short time, except by Gen. Hamilton, and I have not gone out of my way to hunt up testimonies from that quarter. The views of Mr. Jay are known to have been strongly Anti-Slavery; and,althiugh Gen. Hamilton may have felt less on the subject, he was equally deeidec in his opposition to the institution. I have dilisrently sought fjr everything which Gen Washington wrote on the subject of Slavery. It will be seen that his judgment and his feelings were decidedly against the institution, whether viewed in the light of morality or political economy. And while he, on all occasions, expressed his strong disapprobation of it, h? saw and fjit the political necessity of shielding it from unconstitutional encroachment. Without this pro- tection from external and Federal interference, there could be no union among the States, no domestic peace, and, therefore, no security for the National Independence. Th position of Washington on this question would form the true compromise at the present day. His humanity, hi< benevolence, his sense of ju-tice and expediency were all on the side of Emancipation, at the earliest practicable period; and yet, his fidelity to his political obligation- constrained him, while the institution should last, to maintain the State sovereignty which guarded it from illegal interference. The views of Mr Jefferson and Mr. Madison are entirely coincident with those of the Father of his Country on this question. The former has more strongly and pointedly given expression to his abho'rence of Slavery, but he concurred entirely in the neces-<iiy of constitutional inhilutions against foreign interference with it. It ia but justice to those great men, that their entire positions .-hould be known. The resolutions adopted at public meetings in Virginia, and by a general Convention at Williamshu g, show that the state of feeling among the people corresponded with that expressed by the eminent men whose writings I have quoted in this work. I regret that I have been compelled to place the materials of this compilation in the hands of the printer as rapidly as I have gathered them, thereby precluding any methodical arrangement of its parts. The Index, on the last page, however, will obvia.e any dilnculty which might arise from this circumstance. Washington, MarcA, 1858. DANIEL R. GOODLOE. [copyright secured.] J : — — ——— — — THE SOUTHERN PLATFORM. freemen, manufacturers, and others, M'ho The following extracts from the proceedings would emigrate from Europe and settle here, the Southern States, of public meetings in and occasions an annual balance of trade prior to the Declaration of Independence, show against the country; and, therefore, that the that puixhase of all imported slaves ought to be the state of feeling among the people at associated against.
Recommended publications
  • 1906 Catalogue.Pdf (7.007Mb)
    ERRATA. P. 8-For 1901 Samuel B. Thompson, read 1001 Samuel I?. Adams. ' P. 42—Erase Tin-man, William R. P. 52—diaries H. Smith was a member of the Class of 1818, not 1847. : P. 96-Erase star (*) before W. W. Dearing ; P. 113 Erase Cozart, S. W. ' P. 145—Erase Daniel, John. ' j P. 1GO-After Gerdine, Lynn V., read Kirkwood for Kirkville. I P. 171—After Akerman, Alfred, read Athens, (Ja., for New Flaven. ; P. 173—After Pitner, Walter 0., read m. India Colbort, and erase same ' after Pitner, Guy R., on p. 182. • P. 182-Add Potts, Paul, Atlanta, Ga. , ! CATALOGUE TRUSTEES, OFFICERS, ALUMNI AND MATRICULATES UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA, AT ATHENS, GEORGIA, FROM 1785 TO 19O<». ATHENS, OA. : THF, E. D. STONK PRESS, 190G. NOTICE. In a catalogue of the alumni, with the meagre information at hand, many errors must necessarily occur. While the utmost efforts have been made to secure accuracy, the Secretary is assurer) that he has, owing to the impossibility of communicating with many of the Alumni, fallen far short of attaining his end. A copy of this catalogue will be sent to all whose addresses are known, and they and their friends are most earnestly requested to furnish information about any Alumnus which may be suitable for publication. Corrections of any errors, by any person whomsoever, are re spectfully invited. Communications may be addressed to A. L. HULL, Secretary Board of Trustees, Athens, Ga. ABBREVIATIONS. A. B., Bachelor of Arts. B. S., Bachelor of Science. B. Ph., Bachelor of Philosophy. B. A., Bachelor of Agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Nunrurr4~Lu \ ~Tutn Published by the TENNESSEE GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY Memphis, Tennessee
    I I u~. h. 1f'M ..nUnrUrr4~lU \ ~tUtn Published by THE TENNESSEE GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY Memphis, Tennessee .. Mrs. Gene .F~ Davis, Editor I VOLUME 25 SUMMER, 1978 NUMBER 2 - CONTENTS - LIBRARY NOTES - The Territorial Papers of the United States ~ ... 51 BOOK REVIEWS ••••••••••••••t '.' ••,••••••••• ••• 52 NEWS AND NOTES FROM OTHER PUBLICATIONS . .. ••• 58 LOCAL COLOR •••.••• 59 . .. .. ••• 11 . •• · . WILSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, MARRIAGE BONDS ·. .. 60 GIBSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, TAX LIST - 1836 ••• · . ••• 65 WARREN COUNTY, TENNESSEE, DEED BOOK D •• · . · . .71 INDEX TO QUESTIONNAIRES OF CIVIL WAR SOLDIERS • . · . ••• 77 SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE, COURT MINUTES, BOOK I, 1820-1824 (Abstracts) ••• 83 ARDEN ANDREWS' WILL, MARTIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA . 88 OVERTON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, INDEX TO 1840 CENSUS ••• •• 89 OVERTON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, 1840 REVOLUTIONARY AND MILITARY PENSIONERS. 94 TENNESSEE NEWS ITEMS FROM CATAWBA JOURNAL • · ... · .. ••• 94 QUERIES •••••••• . .. .. 95 J THE TENNESSEE GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY P. O. Box 12124 Memphis, Tennessee 38112 OFFICERS AND STAFF FOR 1978 President Mr. S. Caya Phillips Vice President Mrs. Augusta Brough Recording Secretary Mrs. F. M. O'Neal Correspondence Secretary Mrs. Wilma Sutton Cogdell Librarian Mrs. Vivian L. Briggs Assistant Librarian Mrs. John D. Tyus Surname Index Secretary Mrs. Curtis Craven Treasurer Mr. John Hollis Editor Mrs. Gene F. Davis Associate Editor Mrs. Daniel E. West Director Mrs. Charles Roy Gilley Director Mrs. Charles Barham, Jr. LIBRARY STAFF EDITORIAL STAFF BUSINESS STAFF Mrs. F. H. O'Neal Miss Myrtle She1 ton Mr. Claude Deshazo Mrs. Jane Hollis Mrs. Jane Hollis Mrs. Charles Roy Gilley Mrs. Mary Kay Loomis Mr. Herman L. Bogan Mr. Joe Maxey Mrs. Robert Louis Cox Dr. James R. Johnson Mrs. Robert Louis Cox Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kettle Creek Battlefield Survey
    Stirring Up a Hornet’s Nest: The Kettle Creek Battlefield Survey LAMAR Institute Publication Series Report Number 131 The LAMAR Institute, Inc. Stirring Up a Hornet’s Nest: The Kettle Creek Battlefield Survey LAMAR Institute Publication Series, Report Number 131 Submitted to City of Washington P.O. Box 9 Washington, Georgia 30673 Submitted by Daniel T. Elliott, Principal Investigator and Author The LAMAR Institute, Inc. P.O. Box 2992 Savannah, GA 31402 2009 TableB of Contents Table of Contents i List of Figures iiH List of Tables vH Acknowledgements vi I. Introduction 1 Battle Summary 1 Project Environment 2 II. Research Methods 4 Archival Research 4 Fieldwork 12 Laboratory Analysis 15 Reporting 16 Curation 16 III. Previous Research 17 Previous Historical Research 17 Previous Archeological Research 36 IV. The Participants 37 Patriot Militia 37 Biographies of Selected Patriot Participants 45 Other Patriots Linked to Kettle Creek 76 Loyalist Militia 80 Selected Loyalist Participants 81 Troop Strength and Casualty Estimates 95 V. The Battlefield 97 Battlefield Imagery 97 Military Landscape of Wilkes County 100 Property Ownership and Kettle Creek 112 Landscape Modifications 124 VI. Archeological Results 127 Battlefield Landscape 127 Activity Loci 132 Material Culture 137 VI. Summary and Recommendations 160 Executive Summary 160 Battle Analysis 160 Recommendations 166 References Cited 170 Appendix I. Artifact Inventory, Kettle Creek Battlefield Survey, 2008 196 Appendix II. Kettle Creek Roster 210 i ListB of Figures Figure 1. Kettle Creek Battlefield Location Map. ......................................................................................... 3 Figure 2. Kettle Creek Battlefield Study Area (U.S.G.S. 1991)................................................................... 13 Figure 3. View of Project Area, Facing North from Monument Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Virginia Marriages. Pt. I
    Gc 975.5 CSSe 15SS475 REYNOLDS HISTORICAL. GENEALOGY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 02374 5083 GC 975.5 C88E lutrhj Utrgtnta MnvvmQZB PART I. EDITED DY WILLIAM ARMSTRONG CROZIER, F. R. Si, F. G. S. A. Virginia County Record" Series VOL. IV. '£?>£; PUBLISHED BY THE GENEALOGICAL ASSOCIATION NEW YORK MDCCCCVil </W <L f HU* 1588475 iEarlg Itrgtttm ifcriagea . ~^r^<^W\ HE Virginia marriage records are divided into two and \j fx$ classes—those contained in the parish registers, bonds or intentions, which were filed ite? \ I'l the marriage clerk. The present volume treats rll |f| with the county ui records.itwi u.-. «It is. L^X'3/Pf-T^^- *^5J principally wunwith methe lattericuiei viasaclass of P^X§^!<4>^i^ however, the Editor's intention to incorporate B pans future \olumes, the marriage entries contained in haherto unpnnted registers are nearl registers, and already abstracts from two important old completed. Q As the marriage records are printed under their individua to issue an index to this volume counties, it has not been deemed necessary pages pertaining but a small amount of time being necessary to consult the separate index volume to the county in which the searcher is interested. A " Series." will be issued upon the completion of the Marriage 4 The following table gives the date of the foimation of the coun named in this volume. Brunswick. Amelia, formed in 1 734 from Prince George and Augusta, formed in 1738 from Orange. Charles City, one of the eight original shires of 1634. Elizabeth City, one of the eight original shires of 1634.
    [Show full text]
  • Galphin Family Cemetery, Silver Bluff S.C
    Descendants of Thomas I Galphin Generation No. 1 1. THOMAS I1 GALPHIN was born Unknown in North Ireland, and died 1735 in North Ireland. He married BARBARA RANKIN1,2 Bef. 1709 in North Ireland. She was born Unknown in North Ireland, and died Unknown in North Ireland. Notes for THOMAS I GALPHIN: The name was by tradition pronounced "Golfin" and is sometimes spelled that way as well as "Golphin," and "Guelphin." George I Galphin and his literate children always wrote it as "Galphin." Tradition states that Thomas was a linen weaver, an occupation of many poor small farmers in this area of North Ireland, Armagh, a county south of Belfast. Another tradition makes Thomas of Scots/Irish lineage but no documents exist to prove this heritage. He died in 1735 in Antrim, North Ireland. Perhaps he left George a small patrimony with which to marry. Notes for BARBARA RANKIN: Letters of administration on the estate of Thomas Galphin, late of Tullamore in Armagh Co., were granted his widow Barbara on February 6, 1734/35. From the "Index of Prerogative Administrations," in the Genealogical Office, Dublin, Ireland. Shows Thomas left seven children, among them a son George. He was the oldest child. Probably one of the girls had died. Children of THOMAS GALPHIN and BARBARA RANKIN are: 2. i. GEORGE I2 GALPHIN, b. 1709, Antrim, North Ireland; d. December 01, 1780, Silver Bluff, SC. 3. ii. MARTHA GALPHIN, b. Abt. 1735, Antrim, North Ireland; d. Abt. 1782, Augusta, GA. 4. iii. MARGARET GALPHIN, b. Unknown, North Ireland; d. North Ireland. iv.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Changes in Georgia, 1775-1787.: INSTITUTION Georgia Commission for the Bicentennial Celebration, Atlanta.; Georgia, State Dept
    DOCUMENT sEsipm ED 156 589 SO 010\993 -AUTHOR lAnderton, James LaVerne TITLE Political Changes in Georgia, 1775-1787.: INSTITUTION Georgia Commission for the Bicentennial Celebration, Atlanta.; Georgia, State Dept. of Education, 4 .4 (*)i` tlanta. P.UB DATE. 77 . NOTE 22p.; For related documents, see SO 010'5.66-992, EDRS PRICE . MF-$0.83 HC-$1.67 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Colonal History (United States) ;Conflict; 'Instructional Materials; Junior High School Students; Learning Activities; Military Service; Political 'Issues; *Politics; *Power Structuie; *Reading haterials; *Revolutionary War (United States)\; Secondary Education; 'Social Attici; State Bistgry4,-, Supplementary Textbock*; Teaching Glides; *United States History IDENTIFIERS *Georgia ABSTRACT , The pamphlet discusses changes inrtbe political leadership of Georgia during the Revolutionary War years. It is 'Pone of a series of documents, about the American Revolution in Georgia. Designed for junior or senior high school students; it can serve as supplementary reidinT,or a two-week unit. A teacher's guide is included. Political development in Georgia during the revolutionary and confederation periods was affected by anylproblems in the state: small population, wide extent of settlement, and rivalry tetween the coast and backcountry. Strong factional gicupg bithin,the pathiot Party and brief restoration of a British provincial government divided the state and prevented regularization cf government until after 1782. Georgia political history in tbis period is a study of party and provincial congress leaders. They. endeavored tc promote, population growth, tuild a bew,capital city, 'and create a state university. The coastal-upcolintry struggle resulted in the emergence of upcountry leaders and the .physical relocation of the capital.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Glascock County Transcribed By: Brenda Pierce
    The Story of Glascock County Transcribed by: Brenda Pierce For many years before the area became known as Glascock County, two tribes of Indians -- The Muscogee and Creek -- roamed the land along the Ogeechee River and Rocky Comfort Creek. The first white settlers in this area were German immigrants who settled near the headwaters of the Ogeechee River and formed the community known as Georgetown in 1750-93. This community is presently owned by Levi KITCHENS. Before the white settlers arrived, it was an Indian trading post. Disputes arose in the colony and a duel was fought between two of the citizens, Goodwin and Lovette, and both were killed and buried in the local burying ground. Bases of Indian mounds, cellars and cemeteries mark the spot where the town stood. The Indians moved around 1773. The German settlers moved to Pennsylvania. To the treaty of Augusta signed in 1773, ceded what is now known as Glascock County to the Georgia Colony. The first highway ever cut through the area was later to become Glascock County was the King's Highway, extending from Waynesboro to Wrightsboro. This road was opened as early as 1768 or 1769, and became known in our section as "The Quaker Road." It was in 1777, that Governor James Wright, still the Royal Governor of Georgia, in a treaty with the Indians, acquired the immense territory, which soon was called Wilkes. In 1793, the southern part of this pioneer territory was laid off as Warren County and included, at that time practically the entire area which was destined to become Glascock County in 1857, and named for General Thomas Glascock.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barclays of New York
    . d National Library of Scotland *B0001 78779* -7^ U ^^ a.(St*s?/ ^zcS-czsCS- ¥> J-~lX, & c*CsS Azcs~o&tl '?*•?• jr J*-<^ ft % V. * V The Barclays of New York : Who They Are and Who They Are Not, — and Some Other Barclays BY R. BURNHAM MOFFAT NEW YORK ROBERT GRIER COOKE, PUBLISHER 1904 Copyright, 1904 By R. BURNHAM MOFFAT PRESS OF THE LIVINGSTON MlDOLEDITCH CO. NEW YORK ALEXANDER BARCLAY, Eso^ OF St. Paul, Minnesota — CONTENTS. PAGE PART I. —A Mistaken Tradition. Testimony of the Records of East New Jersey i PART II. —A Mistaken Tradition, Continued. Testimony of the Records at Bury Hill, Surrey 17 PART III. —A Mistaken Tradition, Continued. Testimony of the Records in London. ... 41 PART IV. Line of Descent from John Barclay, of East New Jersey 53 PART V. The Dublin Branch of the Barclays of Ury 66 PART VI. Line of Descent from Thomas Bar- clay, of St. Mary's County, Maryland. 86 PART VII. Line of Descent from Rev. Thomas Barclay, First Rector of St. Peter's Church, Albany 99 PART VIII. Extracts from New York City Direc- tories. 1786-1803 219 PART IX. —A Partial Table of Descent of the Barclays of Ury 222 PART X. Sundry Lines of Descent of American Barclays and Barkleys 227 PART XL Some Scattered Barclay Records..!. 332 PART XII. Sundry Records of the Barclays in Ireland, other than of the Ury Family. 374 — Contents. PAGE APPENDIX A.—Records of the Amboy Monthly Meeting 382 APPENDIX B.—Act of Parliament, 45 Geo. Ill, Chap. 88 385 APPENDIX C.
    [Show full text]
  • Lachlan Mcintosh Papers
    Lachlan McIntosh papers Descriptive Summary Repository: Georgia Historical Society Creator: McIntosh, Lachlan, 1725-1806. Title: Lachlan McIntosh papers Dates: 1742-1799 Extent: 0.35 cubic feet (10 folders) Identification: MS 0526 Biographical/Historical Note Lachlan McIntosh (1727-1806) was born in Scotland, the son of John Mohr and Marjory (Fraser) McIntosh. He and his family came to Savannah in 1736 with Oglethorpe and settled in Darien, Georgia. In 1748, he moved to Charleston, SC, where he worked as a clerk in a counting house and lived with Henry Laurens. He later became a successful planted on the Altamaha River. At the outbreak of the American Revolution, he was appointed Colonel of the 1st Regiment, Georgia line, and was soon promoted to Brigadier-General in the Continental Army. McIntosh dueled with Button Gwinnett in 1777, fatally wounding his opponent. He served for a short while in the Western Department, and he returned to Georgia to lead the unsuccessful attempt to recapture Savannah. He was taken prisoner at the fall of Charleston and, after his exchange, he served until the end of the war, attaining the rank of Major-General. He returned to Georgia and resumed planting. McIntosh married Sarah Threadcraft; together, they had eight children: John, Lachlan Jr., William (who married a Mrs. Tate), George, Henry Laurens, Hester (who married 1. John Peter Ward and 2. Dr. Nicholas Byard), and Catherine (who married Charles Harris). Both William and Lachlan, Jr., served in the Revolutionary War (John was in the Bahamas at the time). McIntosh became a member of the Society of the Cincinnati in 1784; the same year, he was elected to Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foxworthy-Fallon Siblings
    THE FOXWORTHY - FALLON SIBLINGS by Donald F. Foxworthy This book has been reprinted with the permission of Donald F. Foxworthy by the Livermore-Amador Genealogical Society P.O. Box 901, Livermore, CA 94551-0901 www.L-AGS.org Project Leader Richard Finn Digital conversion George Anderson Cover design Richard Finn . Published by the author in print in 1997 Republished in print by L-AGS in 2004 Converted to digital form, republished in print and posted online by L-AGS in 2012 In granting permission for republishing in 2004, the author specified, “ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. This work or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form, electronically, computerized, microfilmed, or photographed for profit or commercial gain without the express written permission of the author.” In keeping with the author’s requirement, L-AGS offers this reprint at the cost of publication, with no markup for royalties to L-AGS. To purchase a copy, go to http://www.Lulu.com and type Foxworthy in the search box. About the Cover Photo courtesy of Mary Foxworthy Rasmussen, sister of the author The cover pictures the author, Donald Freeman Foxworthy, in 1944. He was born 5 March 1925 and died 18 September 2008. He was buried in the Maryland State Veterans Cemetery in Owings Mills, Baltimore County, Maryland. He joined the Navy in 1944 and reached the rank of Radioman 3rd Class. After the war he attended Santa Clara University in Santa Clara, California. This book is a sequel to The Foxworthy-Fallon Saga, published in print by Donald Foxworthy in 1989. The Saga book is in the process of re-publication by L-AGS.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia's Signers of the Declaration of Independence
    Georgia’s Signers Of The Declaration Of Independence Copyright © 2009 by Gordon Burns Smithi All Rights Reserved Published with permission of the Estate First Reading of the Declaration of Independence in Savannah 10 August 1776 In February of 1776 Georgia nominated Archibald Bulloch, Button Gwinnett, John Houstoun, Dr. Lyman Hall, and George Walton as delegates to the Continental Congress. However, Bulloch felt he was too busy as president of Georgia to attend, and Houstoun believed he was of greater service by remaining in Georgia. Only Gwinnett, Hall, and Walton arrived in Philadelphia, barely in time to sign the Declaration of Independence. The news that the united colonies had proclaimed their independence from Great Britain arrived back in Georgia on 8 August. On the day of its arrival in Savannah, more than a month after its adoption in Philadelphia, the Council of Safety read the copy of the Declaration and the accompanying letter from John Hancock, president of Congress. President Archibald Bulloch issued orders for the arrangements to be observed upon the promulgation of the Declaration, which occurred on Saturday, 10 August 1776.ii After great festivities and a public dinner that followed, the citizens formed a funeral procession and symbolically “buried” the Royal Government. On 4 July 1777, the first anniversary of the signing, chance had the 4th Battalion Georgia Continental Line in Philadelphia while on its march south to Savannah. This command had been raised at Peekskill, New York, for service in Georgia. In celebration of the first anniversary of the Declaration, Congress put the new Georgia battalion into special service.
    [Show full text]
  • Trading Lives: Mapping the Pathways and Peoples of the Southeastern Deerskin Trade, 1732-1775
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2007 Trading lives: Mapping the pathways and peoples of the southeastern deerskin trade, 1732-1775 Robert Edward Paulett College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Paulett, Robert Edward, "Trading lives: Mapping the pathways and peoples of the southeastern deerskin trade, 1732-1775" (2007). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623517. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-c5z6-tt51 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRADING LIVES Mapping the Pathways and Peoples of the Southeastern Deerskin Trade, 1732-1775 A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Robert Edward Paulett 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy c.. ... Robert Edward Paulett Approved by the Committee, March 2007 7 7 / -------* * 7 --------- Xj' "Ur- • --------------- / James P. Whittenburg, Chair -1 x James. L. Axtell Kris E. Lane HarveyJHL Jas&son Jacksonville State Urmte it Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]