DOCSLIB.ORG

ADA Response to Defra's Improving Surface Water Drainage Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ADA Response to Defra's Improving Surface Water Drainage Consultation Dr Jean Venables OBE - Chief Executive 8 Address: 12 Cranes Drive, Surbiton, Surrey, KT5 8AL 0 Web: www.ada.org.uK 0 2 Email: [email protected] / 4 TeL: 020 8399 7350 0 / Fax: 020 8390 9368 0 3 – 0 . 1 n The Association of Drainage Authorities o i s r Response to: e V L a n i Defra’s F Improving Surface Water Drainage February 2008 ConsuLtation to accompany proposaLs set out in the Government’s Water Strategy Future Water ADA’s Response to Defra’s Improving Surface Water Drainage - 30/04/07 Contents 01 The Role of ADA 01 An Introduction to Internal Drainage Boards 02 Map1 - Geographical Distribution of IDBs 03 Improving surface water drainage - ADA’s Response 03 Consultation Questions 03 Part 2: Surface Water Management Plans 10 Part 3: Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDS) 13 Part 4: Drainage of surface water to the public sewerage system – review of Section 106 of the Water Industry Act 1991 15 Omissions The Role of ADA The Association of Drainage Authorities (ADA) is the membership organisation for those involved in water level management. Its members include Internal Drainage Boards (IDBs), the Environment Agency Regional Flood Defence Committees and the Northern Ireland Rivers Agency. Associate Members include Local Authorities, Consultants, Contractors and Suppliers. The main activities of ADA involve a wide range of work for and on behalf of its members including facilitating the exchange of ideas and promoting discussions to solving common problems and/or introduction of new approaches to members' work. ADA responds to consultations from the Government, either on behalf of members or by facilitating individual member responses. It represents the interests of Drainage Authorities and other members nationally and locally, for example in relation to Bills in Parliament, other legislative measures, and local public inquiries. ADA acts collaboratively with other appropriate bodies or institutions to pursue the Association's objectives including linking to Europe through ADA's membership of EUWMA, the European Union of Water Management Associations. ADA obtains and disseminates information on matters of importance and interest to members, and provides assistance on technical and administrative problems. ADA organises exhibitions and demonstrations such as Catchment 08 for the benefit of members, maintains a website and publishes the quarterly ADA Gazette. 1 An Introduction to Internal Drainage Boards IDBs are long established bodies operating predominantly under the Land Drainage Act 1991 and have permissive powers to undertake work to secure drainage and water level management of their districts and undertake flood risk management works on ordinary watercourses within their districts (i.e. watercourses other than ‘main river’). Much of their work involves the maintenance of rivers, drainage channels and pumping stations, facilitating drainage of new developments and advising on planning applications. They also have statutory duties with regard to the environment and recreation when exercising their permissive powers. The IDBs in existence in England in April 2005 covered 1.2 million hectares of England – representing 9.7% of the total land area (Map 1) 2. Their average annual expenditure is in excess of £49 million, they employ directly or indirectly over 576 staff, have assets in excess of £145 million and operate and maintain over 500 pumping stations, 22,000 km of watercourse, 174 automatic weed screen cleaners and have a part in providing flood protection to 879,000 properties and 600,000 people. They also have responsibilities associated with 398 Sites of Special Scientific Interest plus other designated environmental areas. 1 Taken from Internal Drainage Board Review: Final Report February 2006 http://www.defra.gov.uk/environ/fcd/studies/idbrev/report.pdf 2 Map 1, Geographical Distribution of IDBs http://www.defra.gov.uk/environ/fcd/studies/idbrev/map1.pdf Page | 1 ADA’s Response to Defra’s Improving Surface Water Drainage - 30/04/07 Geographical Distribution of IDBs in England 2 Map 1. Geographical Distribution of IDBs in England http://www.defra.gov.uk/environ/fcd/studies/idbrev/map1.pdf Page | 2 ADA’s Response to Defra’s Improving Surface Water Drainage - 30/04/07 Improving surface water drainage - ADA’s Response The Association of Drainage Authorities welcomes Defra’s consultation to develop the key policy proposals relating to surface water drainage in the Government’s new Water Strategy, Future Water. ADA looks forward to further opportunities to develop suggestions made within ADA’s response with the consultation team. The Association of Drainage Authorities (ADA) has reviewed the Improving surface water drainage consultation at length and wishes to provide the consultation team with ADA’s current thoughts and comments to aid your ongoing efforts with the Government’s Water Strategy. ADA’s Response to the consultation document has been based upon the views expressed at ADA Executive, Technical & Environment and Finance & Administration Committees, Regional Branch meetings and written responses from ADA’s wider membership following the publication of The Pitt Review: Interim Report. As suggested in the consultation document ADA has chosen to use the questions provided as the basis for comment on the consultation’s proposals and omissions. Each consultation question is provided as appears in Part 1: Consultation Overview followed by ADA’s comment indented in italics and bold. Consultation Questions Part 2: Surface Water Management Plans Q.1 Are Surface Water Management Plans the right solution to co-ordinate surface water drainage? How do they fit with current responsibilities? How else might a strategic approach to surface water flood risk management be achieved? Figure 1 – Model for the Integration of Surface Water Management Plans into Water-Related Strategic Planning3. 3 Marston Vale Surface Waters Group Presentation Page | 3 ADA’s Response to Defra’s Improving Surface Water Drainage - 30/04/07 ADA strongly supports the creation of surface water management plans that clearly define the role of stakeholders within them. ADA considers that Water Cycle Strategies and Strategic Flood Risk Assessments must feed into and guide Surface Water Management Plans which should be enforced as supplementary planning guidance. A suitable model for how all three documents should sit together is provided in Figure 1. ADA is aware of a need for SWMPs to be enforceable which has proved an important issue in several of the current integrated urban drainage pilot studies. Q.2 Could the principles set out in Surface Water Management Plans be delivered through a voluntary arrangement? Or should producing such plans be a requirement in critical drainage areas? ADA considers that the production of surface water management plans should be a requirement across all of England and should not be limited to ‘critical drainage areas’. Indeed surface water flooding is inherently unpredictable and dictated by a mosaic of local geography and events interacting with localised weather patterns. Only producing SWMPs in critical drainage areas would either result in a fine patchwork of critical drainage hotspots across the country which cannot be strategically managed or a situation where areas hit by surface water flooding are not required to produce SWMPs because they are deemed not ‘critical’. Another problem that will come from limiting SWMPs to ‘critical drainage areas’, will be a failure to adhere to a catchment approach to flood risk management. Consequently the SWMPs produced are unlikely to fully consider the impacts that management practices may have on other parts of the catchment. SWMP documentation should be appropriate to the scale and nature of the location and its drainage challenges. ADA members strongly agree that SWMPs should be a statutory requirement rather than a voluntary arrangement, to ensure they are delivered fully. Q.3 If the principles of Surface Water Management Plans were a voluntary code of practice, how could we ensure that drainage stakeholders engage in the process? ADA disagrees with the voluntary production of surface water management plans. A voluntary arrangement would need a leader with neutral interests such as an Internal Drainage Board or Local Delivery Vehicle with an ability to liaise, persuade and co- ordinate amongst stakeholder interests and to sustain momentum. A voluntary arrangement brings no guarantee of success and indeed stands open to risk of failure. Q.4 If production of Surface Water Management Plans was required in critical drainage areas, what would be the best way to ensure this took place? ADA does not consider that SWMPs should be restricted to critical drainage area alone; indeed a SWMP should be prepared for all areas as part of the Local Development Framework process. Q.5 Do you think that local authorities are the appropriate body to take the lead on producing a Surface Water Management Plan? ADA is concerned with the positioning of individual local authorities taking the lead on the production of surface water management plans. It is the view of ADA that water management on a catchment basis should be the key principle in determining a strategic approach to flood risk management. Providing surface water drainage management on a local authority basis will divide catchments where rivers are often boundaries to local authority areas. Thus, the implications of any actions delivered to aid surface water drainage may not fully consider their impacts to the wider catchment under single local authority leadership. Both the European Union Water Framework Directive4 and recently 4 EU Water Framework Directive. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/index_en.html Page | 4 ADA’s Response to Defra’s Improving Surface Water Drainage - 30/04/07 launched ‘Future Water’ – The Government’s Water Strategy for England 5cite a catchment based approach to flood risk management as core objectives. Furthermore, numerous local authorities lack the necessary expertise to facilitate this role. If this position is to be fulfilled by local authorities in the future, adequate funds would need to be sought in order to invest in expertise and training.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Belper Parks Local Nature Reserve & Manor Recreation Ground Management Plan
    Belper Parks Local Nature Reserve & Manor Recreation Ground Management Plan Amber Valley Borough Council 1 Belper Parks LNR & Manor Recreation Ground Amber Valley Borough Council Management Plan 2018 – 2023 Document History Date Written Description Author (s) November 2006 Management Plan 2007 - 2012 AVBC – Wildlife Trust – Groundwork Trust November 2011 Management Plan 2012 - 2017 AVBC – Wildlife Trust – Groundwork Trust January 2018 Management Plan 2018 – 2023 AVBC – Wildlife Trust – Groundwork Trust Contact: Richard Hodgkinson Open Spaces Officer Amber Valley Borough Council Landscapes, Growth & Community Safety Town Hall Ripley Derbyshire DE5 3BT Direct Line Tel: 01773 841320 Main Switch Board: 01773 570222 Website: www.ambervalley.gov.uk Email: [email protected] 2 Contents Page Executive Summary Chapter 1. Introduction, background & context 1.0 Introduction & background 6 2.0 Vision 6 3.0 Aims 6 4.0 Site name 7 5.0 Location & size 7 6.0 Site description 8 7.0 Land tenure 13 8.0 Legal factors 13 9.0 Local demographics 14 10.0 History 15 Chapter 2. Where are we now? 11.0 Introduction 19 12.0 The Green Flag Award 19 13.0 A welcoming place 19 14.0 Healthy, safe and secure 22 15.0 Well maintained and clean 25 16.0 Environmental Management 26 17.0 Biodiversity, Landscape and Heritage 28 18.0 Community involvement 38 19.0 Marketing and Communication 41 20.0 Management 42 Chapter 3. Where do we want to go? 21.0 Introduction 44 22.0 Aims and objectives - Action Plan 44 23.0 Conservation Maintenance 48 Additional information
    [Show full text]
  • Opzet Draaiboek STAR-FLOOD
    Strengthening and Redesigning European Flood Risk Practices Towards Appropriate and Resilient Flood Risk Governance Arrangements Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in England – Enhancing societal resilience through comprehensive and aligned flood risk governance arrangements Alexander, M., Priest, S., Micou, A.P., Tapsell, S., Green, C., Parker, D., and Homewood, S. Date: 31 March 2016 Report Number: D3.3 Milestone number: MS3 Due date for deliverable: 30 September 2015 Actual submission date: 28 September 2015 STAR-FLOOD receives funding from the EU 7th Framework programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 308364 Document Dissemination Level PU Public Co-ordinator: Utrecht University Project Contract No: 308364 Project website: www.starflood.eu ISBN: i Cover photo left: Thames Barrier (Dries Hegger, 2013) Cover photo right: City of London (Dries Hegger, 2013) Document information Work Package 3 Consortium Body Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University Year 2016 Document type Deliverable 3.3 Date 11th September 2015 (With amendments made in February 2016) Author(s) Alexander, M., Priest, S., Micou, A., Tapsell, S., Green, C., Parker, D., and Homewood, S. Acknowledgement The work described in this publication was supported by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme through the grant to the budget of the Integrated Project STAR-FLOOD, Contract 308364. We would like to acknowledge and offer our gratitude to the flood risk professionals and academic experts who participated in this research. We also appreciate the valuable critique provided by Prof. Edmund Penning-Rowsell. Disclaimer This document reflects only the authors’ views and not those of the European Union. This work may rely on data from sources external to the STAR-FLOOD project Consortium.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle for the Floodplains
    Battle for the Floodplains: An Institutional Analysis of Water Management and Spatial Planning in England Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the for the Degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Karen Michelle Potter September 2012 Abstract Dramatic flood events witnessed from the turn of the century have renewed political attention and, it is believed, created new opportunities for the restoration of functional floodplains to alleviate the impact of flooding on urban development. For centuries, rural and urban landowning interests have dominated floodplains and water management in England, through a ‘hegemonic discourse alliance’ on land use development and flood defence. More recently, the use of structural flood defences has been attributed to the exacerbation of flood risk in towns and cities, and we are warned if water managers proceeded with ‘business as usual’ traditional scenarios, this century is predicted to see increased severe inconveniences at best and human catastrophes at worst. The novel, sustainable and integrated policy response is highly dependent upon the planning system, heavily implicated in the loss of floodplains in the past, in finding the land for restoring functioning floodplains. Planners are urged to take this as a golden opportunity to make homes and businesses safer from flood risk, but also to create an environment with green spaces and richer habitats for wildlife. Despite supportive changes in policy, there are few urban floodplain restoration schemes being implemented in practice in England, we remain entrenched in the engineered flood defence approach and the planner’s response is deemed inadequate. The key question is whether new discourses and policy instruments on sustainable, integrated water management can be put into practice, or whether they will remain ‘lip-service’ and cannot be implemented after all.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Internal Drainage Boards (Idbs)
    An introduction to Internal Drainage Boards (IDBs) Association of Drainage Authorities The national representative of IDBs in England & Wales What is an Internal Drainage Board? An Internal Drainage Board (IDB) is a local public authority that manages water levels. They are an integral part of managing flood risk and land drainage within areas of special drainage need in England and Wales. Each IDB has permissive powers to undertake work to provide water level management within their Internal Drainage District (IDD), undertaking works to reduce flood risk to people and property and manage water levels for local needs. Much of their work involves the maintenance of rivers, drainage channels, outfalls and pumping stations, facilitating drainage of new developments and advising on planning applications. They also have statutory duties with regard to the environment and recreation when exercising their permissive powers. The forerunners of today’s IDBs date back to the time of Henry III who established a Commission for drainage of Romney Marsh in Kent in 1252. Most IDBs today were established by the Government following the passing of the Land Drainage Act 1930. The activities and responsibilities of IDBs are currently controlled by the Land Drainage Act 1991 as amended by subsequent legislation. IDBs are also defined as Risk Management Authorities within the Flood & Water Management Act 2010 alongside the Environment Agency, local authorities and water companies. Today, there are 121 IDBs in Great Britain, 120 in Geographical distribution of England and 3 in Wales (2 IDBs cross the border). IDBs IDBs in England & Wales cover 1.2 million hectares of England (9.7% of England’s (Source: Sharon Grafton, ADA) total land area) and 28,500 hectares of Wales (1.4% of the Wales’ total land area).
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management in Kent Select Committee Report 2007
    Flood Risk Management in Kent Select Committee Report 2007 Kent County Council County Hall Maidstone ME14 1XQ 08458 247247 [email protected] 2 Contents Foreword ......................................................................................................................... 5 1 Executive Summary.................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Committee membership ..................................................................................... 7 1.2 Terms of Reference ........................................................................................... 7 1.3 Evidence gathering............................................................................................ 8 1.4 Visits .................................................................................................................. 8 1.5 Glossary of terms and acronyms........................................................................ 9 1.6 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 11 1.7 Summary of Recommendations ....................................................................... 13 2 National Policy Development.................................................................................. 17 3 Organisational Responsibilities............................................................................... 21 4 Funding for flood defences ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sanitary Reform of London: the Working Collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, Ca
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/ft3x0nb131 No online items Guide to the Sanitary Reform of London: The Working Collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, ca. 1785-1969 Processed by Special Collections staff. Department of Special Collections Green Library Stanford University Libraries Stanford, CA 94305-6004 Phone: (650) 725-1022 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www-sul.stanford.edu/depts/spc/ © 2002 The Board of Trustees of Stanford University. All rights reserved. DA676 .S26 1785 1 Guide to the Sanitary Reform of London: The Working Collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, ca. 1785-1969 Collection number: DA676 .S26 1785 Department of Special Collections and University Archives Rare Book Division Stanford University Libraries Stanford, California Contact Information Department of Special Collections Green Library Stanford University Libraries Stanford, CA 94305-6004 Phone: (650) 725-1022 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www-sul.stanford.edu/depts/spc/ Processed by: Special Collections staff Encoded by: Steven Mandeville-Gamble © 2002 The Board of Trustees of Stanford University. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Sanitary Reform of London: the working collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, Date (inclusive): ca. 1785-1969 Collection number: DA676 .S26 1785 Creator: Bazalgette, Joseph Extent: 455 items Repository: Stanford University. Libraries. Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives. Abstract: The collection documents the history of the sanitary evolution of London from the 1840s to the early twentieth century. Some 4500 separate printed, typescript, and manuscript items trace the stages by which the drainage and fresh water supply for London was introduced-- in its time perhaps the greatest feat of urban civil engineering that had ever been undertaken.
    [Show full text]
  • Drainage Institutions in the Netherlands
    Drainage Institutions in Public Disclosure Authorized Western Europe: England, the Netherlands, France and Germany Niranjan Pant Public Disclosure Authorized Irrigation and Water Engineering Wageningen University The Netherlands November 2000 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized © International Bank for Reconstruction & Development, 2002 Rural Development Department 1818 H Street N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 This paper was commissioned by the World Bank through the World Bank-Wageningen University Cooperative Programme. It was first printed in India as a CWP Working Paper Series. This paper carries the name of the author and should be used and cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions are the author’s own and should not attributed to the World Bank, its Board of Directors, its management, or any member countries. Preface This paper is one of a series of products created under a collaborative work program between the Rural Development Department of the World Bank, Washington D.C., and the Irrigation and Water Engineering Group at Wageningen University, the Netherlands. The program ran from 1999 to 2002 and was headed by Dr. Geert Diemer (World Bank) and Dr Peter P. Mollinga (Wageningen University). Dr. Mollinga served as primary editor for the series of products coming from this program. The activities in this program focused on participatory irrigation management. Through this cooperative program, Wageningen University staff participated in the Training of Trainers programs organized by International Network on Participatory Irrigation Management (INPIM) in Bari, Italy. The views expressed in the research papers are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the program coordinators; Wageningen University; or the World Bank or its Board of Executive Directors.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Flood and Water Management Bill Cm 7582
    Draft Flood and Water Management Bill April 2009 Cm 7582 £42.55 Draft Flood and Water Management Bill April 2009 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs By Command of Her Majesty April 2009 Cm 7582 £42.55 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR Telephone 020 7238 6000 Website: www.defra.gov.uk © Crown Copyright 2009 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please write to Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Flood and Water Management Bill Team Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Area 2C Ergon House London SW1P 2AL Email: [email protected] This document is available on the Defra website: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environ/fcd/floodsandwaterbill.htm Published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs ISBN: 978-0-10-175822-2 2 CONTENTS Number of pages Consultation Paper 160 Draft Flood and Water
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Drainage District APPENDIX B , Item
    APPENDIX B Information report Changing the management of two internal drainage districts near Gravesend April 2014 Contents Page Introduction 5 Purpose 5 Rationale 5 Timeline 6 National Background 7 Definitions: IDDs, IDBs and watercourses 7 History 8 Current governance 9 Local Background 11 Definitions: IDDs and IDBs west and east of Gravesend 11 History 11 Current governance 13 Roles, powers and responsibilities 14 Introduction 14 IDBs 14 Environment Agency 15 LLFAs 16 District Councils 16 Landowners 16 Strategic context 18 Introduction 18 North Kent Rivers Catchment Flood Management Plan (CFMP) 18 Thames Estuary 2100 Plan (TE2100) 20 Habitat Creation Programme 21 South Thames Estuary and Marshes Water Level Management Plan (WLMP) 21 Nature Improvement Area 22 Local Flood Risk Management Strategies 22 Profile of the West of Gravesend IDD 24 Introduction 24 Watercourses within the IDD 25 Archaeology and historic monuments 25 Profile of the East of Gravesend IDD 26 Introduction 26 Watercourses within the IDD 27 Statutory designated sites 27 The future of the district 30 Archaeology and historic monuments 30 Financial information 31 Introduction 31 Income – grants and contributions 31 2 Income – drainage rates and special levy 32 Income – Higher Land Water Contributions (HLWC) 34 Additional funding 34 Expenditure – Environment Agency precept 36 Expenditure – maintenance 37 Annual report 37 Operation and maintenance 39 Assets 39 Asset inspections 39 Maintenance 40 Maintenance standards 40 IDB maintenance 41 Environment Agency maintenance
    [Show full text]
  • The Organisation of Surface Water Management and Its Relationship to Flood Risk and Spatial Planning
    Appendix 1 The organisation of surface water management and its relationship to flood risk and spatial planning. A broad review of France, Germany, Scotland and England. Dr Juliet H Richards School of Environment and Development, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, England. Introduction In France, Germany, Scotland and England, the control of surface water lies within what can broadly be described as a water resource management framework, which may encompass conservation and enhancement of the aquatic environment, ecology and nature conservation, water supply, water quantity, water quality, sewage and surface water collection, treatment and disposal. Whilst these frameworks have evolved in more recent years to bring water resource management in line with the EU Water Framework Directive and the principles of river basin management, the current approach to water resource management taken by each country can be differentiated. The purpose of this report is to provide a broad, comparative review of the institutional and administrative arrangements for the management of surface water in all four countries. In particular, it examines: (a) the organisation of surface water drainage and sewerage responsibilities amongst public or private agencies; and (b) the administration of surface water drainage and sewerage functions, processes or systems undertaken by public or private agencies. In addition, it notes some of the broad linkages between surface water management systems and those of spatial planning and flood risk management, where relevant. Indeed, it is clear that flood risk and surface water management systems have traditionally been divided in all four countries. However, there has been a growing realisation across Europe as a whole of the interdependent relationship between activities in all three of these sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Act 1973
    Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Water Act 1973. (See end of Document for details) Water Act 1973 1973 CHAPTER 37 An Act to make provision for a national policy for water, for the conferring and discharge of functions as to water (including sewerage and sewage disposal, fisheries and land drainage) and as to recreation and amenity in connection with water, for the making of charges by water authorities and other statutory water undertakers, and for connected purposes. [18th July 1973] Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Power to modify conferred (7.2.1994) by 1993 c. 48, ss. 188-190, 193(2), Sch. 6 Pt. II, para. 17(3)(e); S.I. 1994/86, art. 2 PART I 1—3. F1 Textual Amendments F1 Ss. 1–3, 5 repealed by Water Act 1989 (c. 15, SIF 130), s. 190, Sch. 27 Pt. I (with ss. 58(7), 101(1), 141(6), 160(1)(2)(4), 163, 189(4)–(10), 193(1), Sch. 26 paras. 3(1)(2), 17, 40(4), 41(1), 57(6), 58) 4 . F2 Textual Amendments F2 S. 4 repealed by Water Act 1983 (c. 23, SIF 130), Sch. 2 para. 3(1), Sch. 5 Pt. I 5 . F3 2 Water Act 1973 (c. 37) Part II – Functions of Water Authorities Document Generated: 2019-11-21 Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Water Act 1973. (See end of Document for details) Textual Amendments F3 Ss. 1–3, 5 repealed by Water Act 1989 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Drainage Act 1976
    Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Land Drainage Act 1976. (See end of Document for details) Land Drainage Act 1976 1976 CHAPTER 70 An Act to consolidate certain enactments relating to land drainage. [15th November 1976] Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act amended (1.4.1996) by S.I. 1996/593, reg. 2, Sch. 1 C2 The base date version of this Act is as revised to 1.12.1991 and takes into account the effects (if any) on it of consolidating legislation which came into force at that date C3 Act extended by S.I. 1986/208 art. 2(1) C4 Act modified by Water Act 1989 (c. 15, SIF 130), ss. 136(7), 137(10) (with ss. 58(7), 101(1), 141(6), 160(1)(2)(4), 163, 189(4)–(10), 190, 193(1), Sch. 26 paras. 3(1)(2), 17, 40(4), 57(6), 58) C5 Act amended by Water Act 1989 (c. 15, SIF 130), s. 136, Sch. 15 para. 1(4), Sch. 26 para. 38 (with ss. 58(7), 101(1), 141(6), 160(1)(2)(4), 163, 189(4)–(10), 190, 193(1), Sch. 26 paras. 3(1)(2), 17, 40(4), 57(6), 58) C6 Certain functions of a Minister of the Crown under any provisions of this Act transferred (1.9.1989) by Water Act 1989 (c. 15, SIF 130), s. 136, Sch. 15 para. 1(2) (with ss. 58(7), 101(1), 141(6), 160(1)(2) (4), 189(4)–(10), 190, 193(1), Sch.
    [Show full text]