Water Act 1973
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Belper Parks Local Nature Reserve & Manor Recreation Ground Management Plan
Belper Parks Local Nature Reserve & Manor Recreation Ground Management Plan Amber Valley Borough Council 1 Belper Parks LNR & Manor Recreation Ground Amber Valley Borough Council Management Plan 2018 – 2023 Document History Date Written Description Author (s) November 2006 Management Plan 2007 - 2012 AVBC – Wildlife Trust – Groundwork Trust November 2011 Management Plan 2012 - 2017 AVBC – Wildlife Trust – Groundwork Trust January 2018 Management Plan 2018 – 2023 AVBC – Wildlife Trust – Groundwork Trust Contact: Richard Hodgkinson Open Spaces Officer Amber Valley Borough Council Landscapes, Growth & Community Safety Town Hall Ripley Derbyshire DE5 3BT Direct Line Tel: 01773 841320 Main Switch Board: 01773 570222 Website: www.ambervalley.gov.uk Email: [email protected] 2 Contents Page Executive Summary Chapter 1. Introduction, background & context 1.0 Introduction & background 6 2.0 Vision 6 3.0 Aims 6 4.0 Site name 7 5.0 Location & size 7 6.0 Site description 8 7.0 Land tenure 13 8.0 Legal factors 13 9.0 Local demographics 14 10.0 History 15 Chapter 2. Where are we now? 11.0 Introduction 19 12.0 The Green Flag Award 19 13.0 A welcoming place 19 14.0 Healthy, safe and secure 22 15.0 Well maintained and clean 25 16.0 Environmental Management 26 17.0 Biodiversity, Landscape and Heritage 28 18.0 Community involvement 38 19.0 Marketing and Communication 41 20.0 Management 42 Chapter 3. Where do we want to go? 21.0 Introduction 44 22.0 Aims and objectives - Action Plan 44 23.0 Conservation Maintenance 48 Additional information -
25897 Chapter 19 Cover 6Mm.Indd
Civil Aviation Act 2012 CIVIL AVIATION ACT 2012 AVIATION CIVIL CHAPTER 19 Explanatory Notes have been produced to assist in the understanding of this Act and are available separately Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail TSO PO Box 29, Norwich, NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 The Houses of Parliament Shop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square London SW1A 2JX £18.50 Telephone orders/General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.shop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents Civil Aviation Act 2012 CHAPTER 19 CONTENTS PART 1 AIRPORTS CHAPTER 1 REGULATION OF OPERATORS OF DOMINANT AIRPORTS General duties 1 CAA’s general duty 2 Secretary of State’s general duty Prohibition 3Prohibition 4 Prohibition: exemption Dominant airports 5 Dominant areas and dominant airports 6 Market power test 7 Market power determinations 8Publication of market power determinations 9 Operators of areas 10 Operator determinations 11 Publication of operator determinations 12 Advance determinations 13 Appeals against determinations Licences 14 Application for licence ii Civil Aviation Act 2012 (c. 19) 15 Granting licence 16 Refusing to grant licence 17 Content and effect of licence Licence conditions 18 Licence conditions 19 Price control conditions 20 Conditions relating to CAA charges 21 Content and effect -
The Law of the National Rivers Authority the Law of the National Rivers Authority
NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY NRA by Centre for Law in Rural A reas U.C.W. Aberystwyth Notional Rivers Aumortty Information Centre [Head Office Class No m Accossion No National Information Centre The Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive Aztec West BRISTOL BS12 4UD Due for return THE LAW OF THE NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY THE LAW OF THE NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY by WILLIAM HOWARTH B.A., LL.M. Director of the Centre for Law in Rural Areas and Lecturer in Law, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth The National Rivers Authority and the Centre for Law in Rural Areas, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth 1990 © W illiam Howarth 1990 ISBN 1 872662 00 5 Published by The National Rivers Authority and the Centre for Law in Rural Areas, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth Copies of this work may be obtained from: The Director, Centre for Law in Rural Areas, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed, SY23 3DZ. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the copyright holder. Printed by Cambrian Printers, Aberystwyth. FOREWORD The Water Act 1989 brings about a dramatic restructuring of the water industry in England and Wales through an overall separation of the responsibilities for utility and regulatory functions in relation to water. This division of the industry will allow a greater degree of specialism to be developed, and ultimately will prove more effective both in satisfying the needs of water consumers and also in safeguarding in general aquatic environment. -
Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ
This is a post-print version of an article which will appear The London Journal, 40(3) (2015), Special Issue: 'London's River? The Thames as a Contested Environmental Space'. Accepted 15 July 2015. Whose River? London and the Thames Estuary, 1960-2014* Vanessa Taylor Univ. of Greenwich, [email protected] I Introduction For the novelist A.P. Herbert in 1967 the problem with the Thames was simple. 'London River has so many mothers it doesn’t know what to do. ... What is needed is one wise, far- seeing grandmother.’1 Herbert had been campaigning for a barrage across the river to keep the tide out of the city, with little success. There were other, powerful claims on the river and numerous responsible agencies. And the Thames was not just ‘London River’: it runs for over 300 miles from Gloucestershire to the North Sea. The capital’s interdependent relationship with the Thames estuary highlights an important problem of governance. Rivers are complex, multi-functional entities that cut across land-based boundaries and create interdependencies between distant places. How do you govern a city that is connected by its river to other communities up and downstream? Who should decide what the river is for and how it should be managed? The River Thames provides a case study for exploring the challenges of governing a river in a context of changing political cultures. Many different stories could be told about the river, as a water source, drain, port, inland waterway, recreational amenity, riverside space, fishery, wildlife habitat or eco-system. -
Hydrogeology of Wales
Hydrogeology of Wales N S Robins and J Davies Contributors D A Jones, Natural Resources Wales and G Farr, British Geological Survey This report was compiled from articles published in Earthwise on 11 February 2016 http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php/Category:Hydrogeology_of_Wales BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database rights 2015. Hydrogeology of Wales Ordnance Survey Licence No. 100021290 EUL. N S Robins and J Davies Bibliographical reference Contributors ROBINS N S, DAVIES, J. 2015. D A Jones, Natural Rsources Wales and Hydrogeology of Wales. British G Farr, British Geological Survey Geological Survey Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. Cover photo: Llandberis Slate Quarry, P802416 © NERC 2015. All rights reserved KEYWORTH, NOTTINGHAM BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 2015 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS British Geological Survey offices shops at Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or BGS Central Enquiries Desk shop online at www.geologyshop.com Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 email [email protected] The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, maps, for consultation. -
Opzet Draaiboek STAR-FLOOD
Strengthening and Redesigning European Flood Risk Practices Towards Appropriate and Resilient Flood Risk Governance Arrangements Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in England – Enhancing societal resilience through comprehensive and aligned flood risk governance arrangements Alexander, M., Priest, S., Micou, A.P., Tapsell, S., Green, C., Parker, D., and Homewood, S. Date: 31 March 2016 Report Number: D3.3 Milestone number: MS3 Due date for deliverable: 30 September 2015 Actual submission date: 28 September 2015 STAR-FLOOD receives funding from the EU 7th Framework programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 308364 Document Dissemination Level PU Public Co-ordinator: Utrecht University Project Contract No: 308364 Project website: www.starflood.eu ISBN: i Cover photo left: Thames Barrier (Dries Hegger, 2013) Cover photo right: City of London (Dries Hegger, 2013) Document information Work Package 3 Consortium Body Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University Year 2016 Document type Deliverable 3.3 Date 11th September 2015 (With amendments made in February 2016) Author(s) Alexander, M., Priest, S., Micou, A., Tapsell, S., Green, C., Parker, D., and Homewood, S. Acknowledgement The work described in this publication was supported by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme through the grant to the budget of the Integrated Project STAR-FLOOD, Contract 308364. We would like to acknowledge and offer our gratitude to the flood risk professionals and academic experts who participated in this research. We also appreciate the valuable critique provided by Prof. Edmund Penning-Rowsell. Disclaimer This document reflects only the authors’ views and not those of the European Union. This work may rely on data from sources external to the STAR-FLOOD project Consortium. -
British Waterways Board V Severn Trent Water Ltd (CA)
25 [2002] Ch British Waterways Board v Severn Trent Water Ltd (CA) A Court of Appeal British Waterways Board v Severn Trent Water Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ Z76 2001 Jan 22, 23; Peter Gibson, Chadwick and Keene LJJ 6 March 2 Water — Sewerage — Surface water — Discharge into canal — Sewerage undertaker having no express statutory power to discharge water in its pipes — Whether power to discharge to be implied — Whether incidental to existing pipe-laying power— Water Industry Act 1991 (c$6), s 159 Q On the true construction of section 159 of the Water Industry Act 19911 a sewerage undertaker has no implied power, incidental to its express powers to lay and maintain pipes under that section, to cause the water in its pipes to be discharged into any available watercourse without any general duty to compensate persons who, in consequence of such discharge, suffer loss or damage (post, paras 43, 71, 75,84-85)- Where, therefore, the plaintiff appealed against the grant of a declaration that the n defendant as a sewerage undertaker had a statutory power to discharge non-foul surface water from the roofs and roads of a new development via a drainage pipe which it had adopted into a canal which vested in the plaintiff as a navigation authority— Held, allowing the appeal, that the defendant did not have an implied power to cause such discharge under section 159 and was obliged to remove the drainage pipe from the plaintiff's property or to reinstate the plaintiff's property (post, paras 45, £ 77,85). Decision of Arden J [2001] Ch 32; [2000] 3 WLR 1; [2000] 1 All ER 347 reversed. -
National Rivers Authority
National Rivers Authority Seminar On Water Pollution Control fvjfUV ffo Y- 8 APPENDIX II (4.1.91.) N.R.A. LEGAL TRAINING ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STAFF POLLUTION PROSECUTIONS SEMBIAfl DAY ONE PROGRAMME PRESENTER 9.30. REGISTRATION & COFFEE 9.50. INTRODUCTION to COURSE REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER or his nominee 10.00. The WATER ACT 1989: TERRY WILLIAMS History COPA Part II Part III Chapter I 10. 20. SPECIAL STATUTORY PROVISIONS: DAVID BATHERS & PETER MITCHESON Offence & Defence or Powers of Entry MARTIN DAVIES 5 TERRY WILLIAMS Sampling (inc Continuity) S & FF Act 1975 Sect 4 Prohibition Notices 11.15. * * Coffee * * 11.30. CASE LAW TERRY WILLIAMS Impress Worcester Alphacell Price v Cromack Wrothwell Pegrum Express Foods McTay 12.05. Costs & Compensation DAVID BATHERS or JOHN BARFORD 12.25. POLICE & CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT MARTIN DAVIES or PETER MITCHESON 12.45. * * Lunch * * 2.00pm. SAMPLING PROCEDURES To be nominated by REM 3.00 PREPARATION of EVIDENCE DAVID BATHERS or JOHN BARFORD for COURT 3.20. * ♦ Tea * * 3.40. PRESENTATION of EVIDENCE in TERRY WILLIAMS COURT & CONDUCT of CASE 4.00. PITFALLS/LESSONS to be LEARNT All Legal Presenters 5.00. SYNDICATE WORK for MOCK TRIAL TERRY WILLIAMS on « Day Two 5.30 DISPERSE DAY TWO PROGRAMME PRESENTER A.M. MOCK TRIAL: TERRY WILLIAMS & ANOTHER LEGAL PRESENTER 9.30 CASE for the PROSECUTION 10.30. * * Coffee * * 10.45. CASE for PROSECUTION continued 11.15. CASE for the DEFENCE 12.15 SUMMING UP BY THE PROSECUTION 12.25. " " M DEFENCE 12.35. JUDGEMENT 12.45. * * Lunch * * 1.50pm. REVIEW of MOCK TRIAL TERRY WILLIAMS 2.00 TOPIC(S) of INTEREST To be nominated by REM to be selected by REM 3.00. -
Lincolnshire Local Flood Defence Committee Annual Report 1996/97
1aA' AiO Cf E n v ir o n m e n t ' » . « / Ag e n c y Lincolnshire Local Flood Defence Committee Annual Report 1996/97 LINCOLNSHIRE LOCAL FLOOD DEFENCE COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 1996/97 THE FOLLOWING REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE WATER RESOURCES ACT 1991 Ron Linfield Front Cover Illustration Area Manager (Northern) Aerial View of Mablethorpe North End Showing the 1996/97 Kidding Scheme May 1997 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 136076 LINCOLNSHIRE LOCAL FLOOD DEFENCE COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 1996/97 CONTENTS Item No Page 1. Lincolnshire Local Flood Defence Committee Members 1 2. Officers Serving the Committee 3 3. Map of Catchment Area and Flood Defence Data 4 - 5 4. Staff Structure - Northern Area 6 5. Area Manager’s Introduction 7 6. Operations Report a) Capital Works 10 b) Maintenance Works 20 c) Rainfall, River Flows and Flooding and Flood Warning 22 7. Conservation and Flood Defence 30 8. Flood Defence and Operations Revenue Account 31 LINCOLNSHIRE LOCAL FLOOD DEFENCE COMMITTEE R J EPTON Esq - Chairman Northolme Hall, Wainfleet, Skegness, Lincolnshire Appointed bv the Regional Flood Defence Committee R H TUNNARD Esq - Vice Chairman Witham Cottage, Boston West, Boston, Lincolnshire D C HOYES Esq The Old Vicarage, Stixwould, Lincoln R N HERRING Esq College Farm, Wrawby, Brigg, South Humberside P W PRIDGEON Esq Willow Farm, Bradshaws Lane, Hogsthorpe, Skegness Lincolnshire M CRICK Esq Lincolnshire Trust for Nature Conservation Banovallum House, Manor House Street, Homcastle Lincolnshire PROF. J S PETHICK - Director Cambs Coastal Research -
Water Resources Act 1963
Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Water Resources Act 1963. (See end of Document for details) Water Resources Act 1963 1963 CHAPTER 38 An Act to provide for the establishment of river authorities and a Water Resources Board, to confer on them, and on the Minister of Housing and Local Government, new functions in relation to water resources in England and Wales, and to provide for the transfer to river authorities of functions previously exercisable by river boards and other bodies; to make further provision for controlling the abstraction and impounding of water, for imposing charges in respect of licences to abstract or impound water, and for securing the protection and proper use of inland waters and water in underground strata; to enable corresponding provision to be made in relation to the Thames and Lee catchment areas and certain other areas in or adjacent to London; and for purposes connected with the matters aforesaid. [31st July 1963] Extent Information E1 For the extent of this Act see s. 137(2)(3) Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act extended by S.I. 1972/971, Sch. 1 Pt. A C2 The base date version of this Act is as revised to 1.12.1991 and takes into account the effects (if any) on it of consolidating legislation which came into force at that date. C3 Act modified by S.I. 1974/607, art. 13(1)(2) C4 Act modified by Channel Tunnel Act 1987 (c. 53, SIF 102), s. 6, Sch. 2 Pt. II para. -
Battle for the Floodplains
Battle for the Floodplains: An Institutional Analysis of Water Management and Spatial Planning in England Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the for the Degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Karen Michelle Potter September 2012 Abstract Dramatic flood events witnessed from the turn of the century have renewed political attention and, it is believed, created new opportunities for the restoration of functional floodplains to alleviate the impact of flooding on urban development. For centuries, rural and urban landowning interests have dominated floodplains and water management in England, through a ‘hegemonic discourse alliance’ on land use development and flood defence. More recently, the use of structural flood defences has been attributed to the exacerbation of flood risk in towns and cities, and we are warned if water managers proceeded with ‘business as usual’ traditional scenarios, this century is predicted to see increased severe inconveniences at best and human catastrophes at worst. The novel, sustainable and integrated policy response is highly dependent upon the planning system, heavily implicated in the loss of floodplains in the past, in finding the land for restoring functioning floodplains. Planners are urged to take this as a golden opportunity to make homes and businesses safer from flood risk, but also to create an environment with green spaces and richer habitats for wildlife. Despite supportive changes in policy, there are few urban floodplain restoration schemes being implemented in practice in England, we remain entrenched in the engineered flood defence approach and the planner’s response is deemed inadequate. The key question is whether new discourses and policy instruments on sustainable, integrated water management can be put into practice, or whether they will remain ‘lip-service’ and cannot be implemented after all. -
Abolishing the Crime of Public Nuisance and Modernising That of Public Indecency
International Law Research; Vol. 6, No. 1; 2017 ISSN 1927-5234 E-ISSN 1927-5242 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Abolishing the Crime of Public Nuisance and Modernising That of Public Indecency Graham McBain1,2 1 Peterhouse, Cambridge, UK 2 Harvard Law School, USA Correspondence: Graham McBain, 21 Millmead Terrace, Guildford, Surrey GU2 4AT, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received: November 20, 2016 Accepted: February 19, 2017 Online Published: March 7, 2017 doi:10.5539/ilr.v6n1p1 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v6n1p1 1. INTRODUCTION Prior articles have asserted that English criminal law is very fragmented and that a considerable amount of the older law - especially the common law - is badly out of date.1 The purpose of this article is to consider the crime of public nuisance (also called common nuisance), a common law crime. The word 'nuisance' derives from the old french 'nuisance' or 'nusance' 2 and the latin, nocumentum.3 The basic meaning of the word is that of 'annoyance';4 In medieval English, the word 'common' comes from the word 'commune' which, itself, derives from the latin 'communa' - being a commonality, a group of people, a corporation.5 In 1191, the City of London (the 'City') became a commune. Thereafter, it is usual to find references with that term - such as common carrier, common highway, common council, common scold, common prostitute etc;6 The reference to 'common' designated things available to the general public as opposed to the individual. For example, the common carrier, common farrier and common innkeeper exercised a public employment and not just a private one.