DOCSLIB.ORG

Of Flood Defence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Of Flood Defence Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Battle for the Floodplains: An Institutional Analysis of Water Management and Spatial Planning in England Thesis How to cite: Potter, Karen (2013). Battle for the Floodplains: An Institutional Analysis of Water Management and Spatial Planning in England. PhD thesis University of Liverpool. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2012 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/11853/ Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk Battle for the Floodplains: An Institutional Analysis of Water Management and Spatial Planning in England Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the for the Degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Karen Michelle Potter September 2012 Abstract Dramatic flood events witnessed from the turn of the century have renewed political attention and, it is believed, created new opportunities for the restoration of functional floodplains to alleviate the impact of flooding on urban development. For centuries, rural and urban landowning interests have dominated floodplains and water management in England, through a ‘hegemonic discourse alliance’ on land use development and flood defence. More recently, the use of structural flood defences has been attributed to the exacerbation of flood risk in towns and cities, and we are warned if water managers proceeded with ‘business as usual’ traditional scenarios, this century is predicted to see increased severe inconveniences at best and human catastrophes at worst. The novel, sustainable and integrated policy response is highly dependent upon the planning system, heavily implicated in the loss of floodplains in the past, in finding the land for restoring functioning floodplains. Planners are urged to take this as a golden opportunity to make homes and businesses safer from flood risk, but also to create an environment with green spaces and richer habitats for wildlife. Despite supportive changes in policy, there are few urban floodplain restoration schemes being implemented in practice in England, we remain entrenched in the engineered flood defence approach and the planner’s response is deemed inadequate. The key question is whether new discourses and policy instruments on sustainable, integrated water management can be put into practice, or whether they will remain ‘lip-service’ and cannot be implemented after all. Against the backdrop of a broader modernity debate, in this thesis the English floodplain emerges as a ‘battle site’ where the planner is caught in the cross fire of an ideological clash between economic (armed with technology) and environmentalist (allied with nature) arguments and preferred change in land use. Furthering interpretative research and discourse analysis to tap and explain belief and knowledge systems rather than rational ‘fluvial systems’ per se, the thesis delves deeper than previous research, into the mind sets and ‘irrationalities’ of actors’ practices on the floodplain. The policy response advocating ‘making space for water’ and floodplain restoration is based on an overstretched steering optimism, and will continue to prove too radical if the mediating and tempering political-institutional context is not seriously addressed. If there is true commitment from the UK government, closing the current implementation deficit on floodplain restoration will require the recognition and amelioration of persisting power structures within government agencies, founded on technological and economic rationalities, and permit the planner to share responsibility, unfettered by one sided growth objectives, to find new ways of working across sectors and disciplines towards sustainable, water sensitive towns and cities. i ii Acknowledgements To Thomas Fischer, who supervised my Master’s (MCD) dissertation on floodplain restoration and encouraged my ‘late’ entry into the academic field. To Jan Gomulski, who clicked ‘send’ on the email to Thomas, enquiring about the possibility of a PhD. To Sue Kidd and Peter Batey, who made me feel valued, to bring my research topic to Liverpool. To Greg Lloyd, who opened my eyes to the research ammunition within the social sciences. To Dave ‘so what’ Shaw – for keeping it real. Back to Thomas – for achieving that fine balancing act of trust in me to conduct the research in my own independent style, yet for key advice and timely ‘steers’, my ideal supervisor and (tor)mentor, with a feeling of self-assurance you were always behind me. To Mully (cat), my second supervisor – often in front of me, including on the laptop’s keyboard. To all my fellow PhD students at Liverpool, with a particular mention for my original ‘office mates’ Steven Ackers, Matt Cocks, Paula Posas, Antonio Ferreira, new next door neighbour Lynne McGowan and most of all Debbie Fox. For much needed support from colleagues, with a special mention for Urmila Jha- Thakur and John Sturzaker. To all those who have helped on my research journey, for many interesting conversations and observations, in particular Sarah Ward at the other end of the ‘bridge’ and the ‘potent’ Francis Hesketh - I look forward to further collaborations. To my mum and dad, who think I will never leave university, hopefully you are right – thank you for your constant support. 4 Finally to Paul, my ‘save the raindrops’ co-conspirator but thesis widower, for your endless love and encouragement, who tried to get me to believe in myself, but certainly kept me laughing – I too now look forward to getting the rucksacks on our backs and off walking in the mountains ‘on a crisp sunny day like this’. iii iv Contents ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................ III PART I: DEFINE AND DESIGN .................................................................... I 1 INTRODUCTION TO A CONTESTED SPACE: THE FLOODPLAINS OF ENGLAND .......................................................... 1 1.1 The Shifting Policy Context for Urban Floodplains ............................................................... 3 The Unknown Effects of Development and Flood Defence on the Watershed .................................................. 4 Floodplain Restoration, ‘Turquoise Belts’ and ‘Daylighting’ ..................................................................... 6 Early Policy Response in Flood Risk Management and Planning ............................................................... 8 1.2 Barriers to the Implementation of Floodplain Restoration ..................................................... 8 Over Complexity of Partnerships and Integration .................................................................................. 9 Traditional Mind Sets .................................................................................................................. 9 Spatial Planning ....................................................................................................................... 10 1.3 ‘Shifts in Governance’ ......................................................................................................... 11 Institutional Complexity and Resulting Policy Implementation Deficits ....................................................... 12 The Restricted Scope of Technocratic and Positivist Policy-Making ............................................................ 13 Connecting Institutional Research to Natural and Engineering Science ....................................................... 14 1.4 My River is Wide, not Deep – Summarising the Research ................................................... 15 An Interpretative Analysis .......................................................................................................... 16 Aim of the Research .................................................................................................................. 18 Structure of the Thesis ................................................................................................................ 18 2 METHODOLOGY: LAYING BARE THE BOTTLENECKS IN FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION POLICY ............................................. 21 2.1 Influences: a Critical Approach within the Interpretivist Paradigm ...................................... 22 2.2 Four Stage Research Design ............................................................................................... 23 Stage 1: Literature Review and ‘Grounded’ Observation ........................................................................ 24 Stage 2: Development of the Theoretical Constructs and Evaluation Framework .......................................... 24 Stage 3: Theoretical Sampling and Coding ........................................................................................ 24 Stage 4: Refine Research Concerns and Theory ................................................................................... 25 2.3 Overall Research Approach: the Case Study ........................................................................ 26 Case Study – to Aim for a More Holistic and Meaningful Explanation ...................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geographies of Ageing and Disaster: Older People’S Experiences of Post- Disaster Recovery in Christchurch, New Zealand
    Geographies of ageing and disaster: older people’s experiences of post- disaster recovery in Christchurch, New Zealand Submitted by Sarah Tupper to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography In April 2018 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. Abstract It was 12:51pm on Tuesday the 22nd of February when a 6.2 magnitude earthquake struck the Canterbury region in New Zealand’s South Island. This earthquake devastatingly took the lives of 185 people and caused widespread damage across Christchurch and the Canterbury region. Since the February earthquake there has been 15,832 quakes in the Canterbury region. The impact of the earthquakes has resulted in ongoing social, material and political change which has shaped how everyday life is experienced. While the Christchurch earthquakes have been investigated in relation to a number of different angles and agendas, to date there has been a notable absence on how older people in Christchurch are experiencing post-disaster recovery. This PhD research attends to this omission and by drawing upon geographical scholarship on disasters and ageing to better understand the everyday experiences of post-disaster recovery for older people. This thesis identifies a lack of geographical attention to the emotional, affective and embodied experience of disaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Belper Parks Local Nature Reserve & Manor Recreation Ground Management Plan
    Belper Parks Local Nature Reserve & Manor Recreation Ground Management Plan Amber Valley Borough Council 1 Belper Parks LNR & Manor Recreation Ground Amber Valley Borough Council Management Plan 2018 – 2023 Document History Date Written Description Author (s) November 2006 Management Plan 2007 - 2012 AVBC – Wildlife Trust – Groundwork Trust November 2011 Management Plan 2012 - 2017 AVBC – Wildlife Trust – Groundwork Trust January 2018 Management Plan 2018 – 2023 AVBC – Wildlife Trust – Groundwork Trust Contact: Richard Hodgkinson Open Spaces Officer Amber Valley Borough Council Landscapes, Growth & Community Safety Town Hall Ripley Derbyshire DE5 3BT Direct Line Tel: 01773 841320 Main Switch Board: 01773 570222 Website: www.ambervalley.gov.uk Email: [email protected] 2 Contents Page Executive Summary Chapter 1. Introduction, background & context 1.0 Introduction & background 6 2.0 Vision 6 3.0 Aims 6 4.0 Site name 7 5.0 Location & size 7 6.0 Site description 8 7.0 Land tenure 13 8.0 Legal factors 13 9.0 Local demographics 14 10.0 History 15 Chapter 2. Where are we now? 11.0 Introduction 19 12.0 The Green Flag Award 19 13.0 A welcoming place 19 14.0 Healthy, safe and secure 22 15.0 Well maintained and clean 25 16.0 Environmental Management 26 17.0 Biodiversity, Landscape and Heritage 28 18.0 Community involvement 38 19.0 Marketing and Communication 41 20.0 Management 42 Chapter 3. Where do we want to go? 21.0 Introduction 44 22.0 Aims and objectives - Action Plan 44 23.0 Conservation Maintenance 48 Additional information
    [Show full text]
  • Downstream Workshop Word for Word Report
    Process sponsored by: Process facilitated by: River Thames Scheme Walton Bridge to Richmond (downstream of the proposed flood channel) Workshop Word for Word Report November 17th 2016 Dialogue Matters Ltd, Registered in England and Wales 7221733 Professional workshop facilitators: Lucy Armitage Dialogue Matters Ltd. Joel Pound Dialogue Matters Ltd. Laurence Tricker Dialogue Matters Ltd. Volunteer small group facilitators: Gemma Carey GBV Andrew Todd GBV Vicky Lutyens GBV Kerry Quinton GBV Jenny Marshall-Evans GBV Ed Ferguson GBV Colette Walmsley Environment Agency Laura Littleton Environment Agency Leanne McKrill Environment Agency Liz Etheridge Environment Agency Laura Littleton Environment Agency Leanne McKrill Environment Agency Typed by: Gemma Carey GBV Andrew Todd GBV Jenny Marshall-Evans GBV Sorted by: Gemma Carey GBV Lucy Armitage Dialogue Matters Ltd. Checked and sign off Dialogue Matters Ltd. 1 Dialogue Matters Ltd, Registered in England and Wales 7221733 Contents 1 About the workshop and this report 3 2 Vision Question 4 2.1 Its 2030 and you are chatting with people about how much better things are now if a flood happens. Why what pleases you most? 4 3 Question & Answers session following presentation 6 4 Sharing Knowledge 8 4.1 Consider the weir options 8 4.2 Information 9 4.3 Local Flooding - Tell us your ‘on the ground’ knowledge 10 4.4 Mapping communities 20 4.5 Flood Storage on the Ham Lands 21 5 Session 2: Community Resilience Measures 23 5.1 What information would your community/interest group like to know as we approach this work? 23 5.2 What types of information will your community/interest group be able to provide to help us progress and develop this work? 26 5.3 What do we need to factor in when considering the location defence options (permanent, temporary and PLP).
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned PDF[7.83
    aedings of osium on Engineering and the Environment: Harmony or Conflict? The Institution of Water Engineers and Scientists SYMPOSIUM ON ENGINEERING AND THE ENVIRONMENT: HARMONY OR CONFLICT? i PROCEEDINGS OF SYMPOSIUM HELD IN . LONDON, ENGLAND, on 6th and 7th DECEMBER 1978 ANY CORRESPONDENCE relating to the papers appearing in this publication should be addressed to the Secretary, The Institution of Water Engineers and Scientists, 6-8 Sackville Street, London W1X 1DD, England. (Telphone: 01-734 5422.) © Copyright reserved by The Institution of Water Engineers and Scientists. The Institution is not responsible as a body for the opinions advanced in any of the papers comprising this symposium. The comments made by the authors and by the contributors to the discussions on the papers are the personal comments of the individuals, and do not necessarily reflect the views of their employing authorities. PREFACE The general theme of this Symposium is the environmental and sociological implications of major engineering works and how these influence the promotion, design, construction, and operation of such works. Within this theme an attempt is made to identify the role which is or should be played by the water services industry and to illustrate this by examples from overseas and the United Kingdom. Thereafter, an attempt is made to examine the way ahead. Problems and public concern relating to pollution of the environment are not new and it could be said that the water industry has a long history of concern for the environment. Be that as it may there have been rapid and dramatic changes in our life style in recent years and the public generally now have a greater awareness and interest in the impact of change and development on the environment which is resulting from the increasingly complex society in which we live.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk De-Maining Project - Consultation Response Document
    Rationalising the Main River Network (RMRN): Suffolk De-maining Project - Consultation Response Document We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment. We help people and wildlife adapt to climate change and reduce its impacts, including flooding, drought, sea level rise and coastal erosion. We improve the quality of our water, land and air by tackling pollution. We work with businesses to help them comply with environmental regulations. A healthy and diverse environment enhances people's lives and contributes to economic growth. We can’t do this alone. We work as part of the Defra group (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs), with the rest of government, local councils, businesses, civil society groups and local communities to create a better place for people and wildlife. Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon House, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] or our National Customer Contact Centre: www.gov.uk/environment-agency T: 03708 506506 Email: [email protected]. © Environment Agency 2017 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 of 22 Foreword We are committed to working with local organisations, landowners and communities to ensure the right organisations are managing the right watercourses. The 3 de-maining pilots that we consulted on nationally in January/February 2018 are an important step in making this happen. We are a national organisation and our focus is on managing watercourses where the flood risk is greatest to people and property, therefore in some locations we are not best placed to lead and manage flood risk.
    [Show full text]
  • March East Internal Drainage Board
    MARCH EAST INTERNAL DRAINAGE BOARD At a Meeting of the March East Internal Drainage Board held at the Middle Level Offices, March on Thursday the 6th June 2019 PRESENT C E Martin Esq (Chairman) R D Gladwin Esq C W Albutt Esq (Vice Chairman) J E Heading Esq J F Clark Esq D J Henson Esq M Cornwell Esq C Marks Esq A Dunham Esq R E Mason Esq G C Dunham Esq D S Morris Esq A J N Gee Esq F H Yeulett Esq Miss Samantha Ablett (representing the Clerk to the Board) and Mr Morgan Lakey (representing the Consulting Engineers) were in attendance. Apologies for absence Apologies for absence were received from A W Coulson Esq, P G Hayes, and Councillor M Purser. B.1260 Declarations of Interest Miss Ablett reminded Members of the importance of declaring an interest in any matter included in today’s agenda that involved or was likely to affect any individual on the Board. B.1261 Confirmation of Minutes RESOLVED That the Minutes of the Meeting of the Board held on the 7th June 2018 are recorded correctly and that they be confirmed and signed. B.1262 Land Drainage Act 1991 Board Membership – Fenland District Council Miss Ablett reported that Fenland District Council had re-appointed Councillors J F Clark and M Cornwell and appointed Councillors C Marks, D Divine, M Purser and F Yeulett to be Members of the Board under the provisions of the Land Drainage Act 1991. Miss Ablett also reported that Councillors Mrs M Davis, S Court and A Pugh were not re- appointed.
    [Show full text]
  • Opzet Draaiboek STAR-FLOOD
    Strengthening and Redesigning European Flood Risk Practices Towards Appropriate and Resilient Flood Risk Governance Arrangements Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in England – Enhancing societal resilience through comprehensive and aligned flood risk governance arrangements Alexander, M., Priest, S., Micou, A.P., Tapsell, S., Green, C., Parker, D., and Homewood, S. Date: 31 March 2016 Report Number: D3.3 Milestone number: MS3 Due date for deliverable: 30 September 2015 Actual submission date: 28 September 2015 STAR-FLOOD receives funding from the EU 7th Framework programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 308364 Document Dissemination Level PU Public Co-ordinator: Utrecht University Project Contract No: 308364 Project website: www.starflood.eu ISBN: i Cover photo left: Thames Barrier (Dries Hegger, 2013) Cover photo right: City of London (Dries Hegger, 2013) Document information Work Package 3 Consortium Body Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University Year 2016 Document type Deliverable 3.3 Date 11th September 2015 (With amendments made in February 2016) Author(s) Alexander, M., Priest, S., Micou, A., Tapsell, S., Green, C., Parker, D., and Homewood, S. Acknowledgement The work described in this publication was supported by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme through the grant to the budget of the Integrated Project STAR-FLOOD, Contract 308364. We would like to acknowledge and offer our gratitude to the flood risk professionals and academic experts who participated in this research. We also appreciate the valuable critique provided by Prof. Edmund Penning-Rowsell. Disclaimer This document reflects only the authors’ views and not those of the European Union. This work may rely on data from sources external to the STAR-FLOOD project Consortium.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding of and Response to Severe Flash Flooding
    Understanding of and response to severe flash flooding Science Report: SC070021 Product code: SCHO0509BQAP-E-P The Environment Agency is the leading public body protecting and improving the environment in England and Wales. It’s our job to make sure that air, land and water are looked after by everyone in today’s society, so that tomorrow’s generations inherit a cleaner, healthier world. Our work includes tackling flooding and pollution incidents, reducing industry’s impacts on the environment, cleaning up rivers, coastal waters and contaminated land, and improving wildlife habitats. This report is the result of research commissioned by the Environment Agency’s Science Department and funded by the joint Environment Agency/ Defra Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Research and Development Programme. Published by: Author(s): Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Ben Cave, Liza Cragg, Jo Gray, Prof Dennis Parker, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol, BS32 4UD Katherine Pygott, Sue Tapsell Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 www.environment-agency.gov.uk Dissemination Status: Publicly available ISBN: 978-1-84911-054-9 Keywords: © Environment Agency June 2009 Flash floods, rapid response catchment, public understanding, response, flood warning All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Research Contractor: Halcrow Group Ltd, Burderop Park, Swindon, The views and statements expressed in this report are Wiltshire. SN4 0QD those of the author alone. The views or statements expressed in this publication do not necessarily Environment Agency’s Project Manager: represent the views of the Environment Agency and the Jacqui Cotton, Flood Risk Science Environment Agency cannot accept any responsibility for such views or statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Published in December 2014 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 2 RBWM Local Flood Risk Management Strategy December 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................8 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................8 1.1 The Purpose of the Strategy ...........................................................................................8 1.2 Overview of the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead ................................................9 1.3 Types of flooding ....................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Who is this Strategy aimed at? .....................................................................................12 1.5 The period covered by the Strategy ...............................................................................12 1.6 The Objectives of the Strategy ......................................................................................12 1.7 Scrutiny and Review ...................................................................................................13 2 Legislative Context ..........................................................................................................14 2.1 The Pitt Review .........................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • River Thames Kingston
    MIN. 1 MIN. MIN. MIN. MIN. 4 MIN T ASE 1 CAUTION COMING BACK TO THE PONTOON Be aware of boat traffic. 2 40 MIN TO BASE RED MARKING 1. Keep an eye out for GoBoat crew. If It is prohibited to sail in areas there is a space free on the pontoon, a marked with red. crew member will wave to you signal- ling to make your way towards them. DOWN STREAM TRAFFIC MIN. Keep to the right and give way 2. If there is not a space, go around to all river users. the bridge and keep an eye out for the GoBoat crew’s signal for you 2 UP STREAM TRAFFIC to come in. Follow instructions at bridges. 3. Keep to the right hand side of the BOAT MOORINGS river until it is safe to cross. If you are The brown areas along the river. coming from Hampton Court Palace Keep a distance. you will not have to cross. If you are 3 coming from Teddington, go through HIGH WIND both bridges. Please do not stop near Use power and steer into the the arches. Keep going beyond the 3 wind to keep control. bridge and only start to cross when MIN. you have space and it is safe to do so. CONGESTED AREAS MIN. Be aware of more boats around. 4. Slowly approach the pontoon head-on, DO NOT attempt HORN SIGNALS to reverse in. ?#!Be aware of sound signals on the River Thames. 5. Once you are within a few meters turn off the motor and pass the front Short: I am altering my course to STARBOARD.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the Council 2004
    MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL 2013 - 2014 North Ward Councillor Paul Howard Whitaker, Glendale, 59 Grassington Road, Skipton, BD23 1LL Tel: 01756 709531 Councillor John Dawson, 42 Gainsborough Court, Skipton, BD23 1QG Tel: 01756 700151 Councillor Roland Wohlrapp, Thorncroft, 60 Raikeswood Drive, Skipton, BD23 1LY Tel: 01756 798643 Councillor Calvin Dow, The Castle Inn, 2 Mill Bridge, Skipton, BD23 1NJ. Tel: 01756 796304 East Ward Councillor Pamela Heseltine, 10 Nelson Street, Skipton, BD23 2DT Tel: 01756 700165 Councillor Eric Jaquin, 11 Grassington Road, Skipton, BD23 1LL. Tel: 01756 799684 Councillor Christopher Harbron, 20 Long Meadow, Skipton, BD23 1BH Tel: 01756 790758 Councillor Wendy Clark, 28 Regent Crescent, Skipton, BD23 1BG Tel: 01756 798077 South Ward Councillor Robert Geoffrey Heseltine, The Ginnel Place, Newmarket Street, Skipton, BD23 2JA Tel: 01756 701243 Councillor Martin Emmerson, 4 Greatwood Avenue, Skipton, BD23 2RU Tel: 01756 701304 Councillor Karen McIntyre, 52 Roughaw Road, Skipton, BD23 2QA Councillor Gordon Bell, 39 Western Road, Skipton, BD23 2RU Tel: 01756 790155 West Ward Councillor Paul Albert English, 98 Burnside Avenue, Skipton, BD23 2DB Tel: 01756 790287 Councillor David Walsh, 38 Western Road, Skipton, BD23 2RU Tel: 01756 797238 Councillor Bernard Clarke, 21 Park Avenue, Skipton, BD23 1PN Tel: 07922 277852 OFFICERS Chief Officer Mr Dave Parker e-mail: [email protected] Project Manager Mr Les Chandler e-mail: [email protected] Administration and Finance Officer Mrs Jill Peacock e-mail: [email protected] Civic Administration Assistant Mrs Wendy Allsopp e-mail: [email protected] Administration Assistant Mrs Elaine Rushworth e-mail: [email protected] Office 2nd Floor, Barclays Bank Chambers, 49 High Street, Skipton BD23 1DT Tel: 01756 700553 Members of Skipton Town Council since re-organisation of Local Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle for the Floodplains
    Battle for the Floodplains: An Institutional Analysis of Water Management and Spatial Planning in England Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the for the Degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Karen Michelle Potter September 2012 Abstract Dramatic flood events witnessed from the turn of the century have renewed political attention and, it is believed, created new opportunities for the restoration of functional floodplains to alleviate the impact of flooding on urban development. For centuries, rural and urban landowning interests have dominated floodplains and water management in England, through a ‘hegemonic discourse alliance’ on land use development and flood defence. More recently, the use of structural flood defences has been attributed to the exacerbation of flood risk in towns and cities, and we are warned if water managers proceeded with ‘business as usual’ traditional scenarios, this century is predicted to see increased severe inconveniences at best and human catastrophes at worst. The novel, sustainable and integrated policy response is highly dependent upon the planning system, heavily implicated in the loss of floodplains in the past, in finding the land for restoring functioning floodplains. Planners are urged to take this as a golden opportunity to make homes and businesses safer from flood risk, but also to create an environment with green spaces and richer habitats for wildlife. Despite supportive changes in policy, there are few urban floodplain restoration schemes being implemented in practice in England, we remain entrenched in the engineered flood defence approach and the planner’s response is deemed inadequate. The key question is whether new discourses and policy instruments on sustainable, integrated water management can be put into practice, or whether they will remain ‘lip-service’ and cannot be implemented after all.
    [Show full text]