DOCSLIB.ORG

Jared Anderson a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the University Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jared Anderson a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the University Of AN ANALYSIS OF THE TEXT OF THE FOURTH GOSPEL IN THE WRITINGS OF ORIGEN Jared Anderson A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Religious Studies. Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Bart Ehrman Joel Marcus Zlatko Plese © 2008 Jared Anderson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Jared Anderson: An Analysis of the Text of the Fourth Gospel in the Writings of Origen (Under the direction of Bart Ehrman) This thesis provides an analysis of the text of the Gospel of John in the writings of Origen of Alexandria (ca. 185-254). Two types of textual analyses, Quantitative and Group Profile, make up the core of this study. Such methods enable scholars to trace the history of transmission of the NT text, and this study confirms that Origen’s text of John is a strong representative of the “Primary Alexandrian” text type, the purest form of the New Testament text. This thesis also provides a history of research of Origen’s text of the New Testament, refines the critical methods used, and models the use of computer programs that increase the accuracy and efficiency of such studies. Finally, the conclusion places these data into historical context and answers several important questions, such as whether Origen changed his manuscripts of John upon relocation from Alexandria to Caesarea in 231. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All academic enterprises build up on previous scholarly endeavors, but this principle holds true in regard to this project to an unusual degree. This thesis represents one stop along a scholarly journey that has already spanned twenty years. In 1992, Bart Ehrman, Gordon Fee, and Michael Holmes published their reconstruction of Origen’s text of the Fourth Gospel.1 At that time, they anticipated a “forthcoming second volume” that would “provide a detailed analysis and evaluation of these data” (p. ix). In the subsequent years, Ehrman began research for the second volume and Bruce Morrill of Kansas State University ran the Quantitative Analysis as well as organizing the data in the first volume. Such represented the state of the project when Bart Ehrman and I discussed possibilities for my Master’s thesis. I am deeply indebted to each of these scholars’ work, which literally made this study possible. Immersing myself in the work of Gordon Fee, Eldon Epp, Bart Ehrman and others who have gone before me has provided a pleasurable and valuable training, and I hope to be able to continue their scholarly legacy to the extent I am able. Bruce Morrill provided me the material that I have revised into what are now the appendices. I have incorporated those changes affecting the analyses. I appreciate Bruce’s help in explaining these data, as well as emailing me information at a crucial time. The significance of his role cannot be overstated, as the format in which he sent me the data made all the analysis I did possible. 1 The Text of the Fourth Gospel in the Writings of Origen (New Testament in the Greek Fathers 3; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1992). iv One contribution of this study is the manner in which I was able to use Microsoft Excel to reduce dramatically the time and effort required to count agreements between manuscripts, as well as reducing the human error involved in such an endeavor. I am grateful again to Bruce for these documents, to Douglas Criger and especially to Arnie Aldridge, who answered my questions regarding the mysteries of Excel and the world of statistics. Computers hold the key to the future of all studies such as this, and I am thankful to them for teaching me some basics and opening my eyes to the beginning of what is possible. I would like to express my appreciation to my advisor Bart Ehrman, who trusted me with this project and who has provided a helpful balance of guidance and confidence in my ability to finish it. I have learned much from his example of scholarship that manages to be simultaneously meticulous and engaging. I am grateful also to my readers Zlatko Plese and Joel Marcus, whose feedback not only improved this thesis, but also provided an important learning opportunity and saved me from numerous errors. Joel’s comments in particular not only improved my writing and pushed me to greater clarity of expression and precision of language, but provided a template I hope to follow in giving written feedback. Finally, I am grateful for the support of my wife Katrina, who has believed in my ability to finish this project. She also proofread several chapters, converted fonts to Greek in Appendix 2, and acted as a sounding board, learning more than should be expected about textual criticism and Group Profiles in the process. The journey of completing this project has been immeasurably more enjoyable because she has been with me. v To my father, Kim Anderson— For what might have been, For what finally was, For what he passed on to me vi TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables………………………………………………………………...……….ix Chapter I. Origen’s Life and Literature………………………………..…………1 A Literary Life………………………………………..……….2 Origen’s Citation of Scripture…………………………………7 Manuscripts Used in this Study……………….………………9 II. The Tracking of Origen’s Texts and Travels…………...……………20 From Johann Griesbach to B. H. Streeter…………………....21 K. W. Kim to Gordon Fee……………………………………30 Gordon Fee…………………………………………………...37 Scholarship since Fee……………………………...…………43 III. Origen’s Text of John: Quantitative Analysis……………………….59 IV. Origen’s Text of John: Group Profiles ………………………...…….83 Breakdown of Verses for Profiles One and Three………...…98 V. Summary and Conclusions………………………………………… 110 Origen’s Manuscripts of John………………………………113 Origen and Heracleon’s Text of John………………............122 Origen and the “Caesarean Text” in John………..…………125 Origen and the History of the Alexandrian Text………..….126 vii Appendix 1: Textual Variation in John………………………………..…………………....129 Appendix 2: Key to Textual Variation in John………..……………………………………145 Bibliography……………………………………………..…………………………………280 viii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Correspondence between Books of the Gospel of John and Origen’s Commentary…………………………………………………………….…………7 2. Witnesses Ranked According to Proportional Agreement with Origen in Genetically Significant Variations in John………………..…………………..68 3. Witnesses Ranked According to Proportional Agreement with Origen in John Arranged by Textual Group ……………………………...……………..73 4. Proportional Agreement with Leading Alexandrian Witnesses (and 1241)………………………………………………………………………..76 5. Proportional Agreement with Leading Western Witnesses a)……………………………………………………..……………………78א and) 6. Proportional Agreement with Leading “Caesarean” Witnesses (and P45)……………………………………………………………...…………..80 7. Group Profiles Analysis………………………………………………...………..90 8. Witnesses Ranked According to Proportional Agreement with the Uniform and Predominant Early Alexandrian Text in John……………………………….95 9. Comparative Percentages of Agreement with Origen in John 4 and 1-21…………………………………………………………...……………121 ix Chapter I ORIGEN’S LIFE AND LITERATURE In the history of New Testament textual criticism, Patristic citations have occupied an awkward and paradoxical place. On one hand, their witness is earlier and can be located more precisely than Greek manuscripts or New Testament translations. On the other hand, the task of accessing their texts is fraught with factors that imperil accuracy, and many scholars have been daunted in this quest, leading to neglect of these important witnesses to the early New Testament text. Fortunately, advances in methodology of the past decades have enabled scholars to access these valuable witnesses with unprecedented accuracy, illuminating vistas along the convoluted transmission of the New Testament writings.1 Champion among the Church Fathers stands Origen of Alexandria, the most prolific and arguably the most brilliant of early Christian writers. The aim of the present study is to provide an analysis of the text of the Fourth Gospel in the writings of Origen, elucidating Origen’s textual alignments and exploring the historical significance of these conclusions.2 1 Gordon Fee has accomplished the greatest advancement in analyzing Patristic citations, shaping their study over the past decades. The volume of his essays collected with those of Eldon Epp (Studies in the Theory and Method of New Testament Textual Criticism. [Studies and Documents 45; Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1993]) is the most convenient source for these studies; see the three chapters categorized under “Method and Use of Patristic Evidence,” 299-359: “The Text of John in Origen and Cyril of Alexandria: A Contribution to Methodology in the Recovery and Analysis of Patristic Citations”; “The Text of John in The Jerusalem Bible: A Critique of the Use of Patristic Citations in New Testament Textual Criticism”; and especially “The Use of Greek Patristic Citations in New Testament Textual Criticism: The State of the Question;” repr. from ANRW II.26.1, 246-65. 2 See the Acknowledgements for the somewhat complicated background of this study. This first chapter will provide background for an investigation of Origen’s textual affinities—a brief biography, focusing on his writings and approach to scripture, as well as an overview of the manuscripts that will be used in this study. Chapter two provides a history of research into Origen’s text of the New Testament that contextualizes the two chapters of analysis that make up the heart of this work. Chapter three uses Quantitative Analysis to explore the contours of agreement between representative witnesses from differing textual traditions in order to discern where Origen’s own textual affinities lie. Chapter four then uses the Group Profiles developed by Bart Ehrman to clarify more precisely those affinities. Finally, the conclusion summarizes the findings and contributions of this study, discusses key historical points relating to these data, especially where Origen fits within the Alexandrian textual tradition of John, and suggests directions for further research. Two substantial appendices conclude the work, which present in efficient form all the textual variants among the representative witnesses and Origen, as well as patterns among those variants.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summary of Baird, History of New Testament Research Vol
    A SUMMARY OF HISTORY OF NEW TESTAMENT RESEARCH, VOL. 1–3 BY WILLIAM BAIRD VOLUME 1: FROM DEISM TO TÜBINGEN INTRODUCTION Baird introduces his book with a quick sketch of the history of NT research before the Enlightenment, as well as a brief word about the methodology of his book. His plan is that the volumes will investigate NT research in the modern age.1 Before the Enlightenment The early church dealt with the issue of the canon. They judged all of the books to be of apostolic authority. They moved between literal (Antiochene) and allegorical (Alexandrian) interpretation. They gradually agreed that the apostolic church had the exclusive right to interpret the scriptures.2 In the Middle Ages, people interpreted the Scripture according to the four levels of meaning: literal, allegorical, tropological (or moral), and anagogical. Thus, “in Gal. 4:24-25, ‘Jerusalem’ could properly be interpreted to mean the historical city in Judea (literally), the Christian church (allegorically), the human soul (morally), and the heavenly city (anagogically).”3 Some were aware of the potential to abuse, and gave priority to the literal sense (as with Aquinas, who said the three spiritual senses had to be rooted in the literal sense).4 During the Reformation, the Bible was placed at the forefront as the foundation for the Christian faith. The reformers were influenced by the exegetical methods of the Renaissance humanists. They inherited the technical methods that were used for the study of ancient literary works. Furthermore, they agreed that the only meaning Scripture has is the literal meaning. The Reformers attempted to return to a study of what the authors of Scripture meant.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelicals and the Synoptic Problem
    EVANGELICALS AND THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM by Michael Strickland A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion University of Birmingham January 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Dedication To Mary: Amor Fidelis. In Memoriam: Charles Irwin Strickland My father (1947-2006) Through many delays, occasioned by a variety of hindrances, the detail of which would be useless to the Reader, I have at length brought this part of my work to its conclusion; and now send it to the Public, not without a measure of anxiety; for though perfectly satisfied with the purity of my motives, and the simplicity of my intention, 1 am far from being pleased with the work itself. The wise and the learned will no doubt find many things defective, and perhaps some incorrect. Defects necessarily attach themselves to my plan: the perpetual endeavour to be as concise as possible, has, no doubt, in several cases produced obscurity. Whatever errors may be observed, must be attributed to my scantiness of knowledge, when compared with the learning and information necessary for the tolerable perfection of such a work.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Constructing Paul, (Dis)Placing Ephesians The Pauline Book and the Dilemma of Ephesians Benjamin J. Petroelje Doctor of Philosophy New Testament and Christian Origins The University of Edinburgh 2018 For Amy, Norah, Rose, and Teddy With Love Declaration I declare that this thesis was composed by myself, that the work contained herein is my own except where explicitly stated otherwise in the text, and that this work has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. __________________________________ Benjamin J. Petroelje - iii - Contents Abstract .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pericope Adulterae 1/20
    András Handl: Tertullianus on the Pericope Adulterae 1/20 TERTULLIANUS ON THE PERICOPE ADULTERAE (JOHN 7,53–8,11) Abstract Although Terullianus is deeply engaged in discussions on Christian marriage, adultery, and on the remission of (grave) sins, he never addressed the story of the woman caught in adultery known today from the Gospel of John. This essay argues that his silence cannot be explained by suppression because of the explosive nature of the story in relation to penitential discipline and to his own views and arguments. Rather, it proposes that the pericope adulterae was unknown in Carthage at his time. 1. Introduction The story of the woman caught in adultery in the Gospel of John (7,53–8,11) represents one of the most mysterious New Testament passages. Omitted in early manuscripts, the circulation and dissemination of the pericope adulterae (henceforth the PA) is controversially discussed. Already C. R. Gregory (1846–1917) claimed that the PA had been “very often read, and especially at a very early time.”1 H. Riesenfeld (1913–2008) assessed that the Latin translation of the passage ”appears sporadically before the Vulgate and then in the entire Vulgate tradition.”2 This judgement has been criticised by T. O'Loughlin. Based on the number of extant Vetus Latina fragments, he came to the conclusion that the PA “was more likely [included] than not to have been present [in the Vetus Latina] prior to the dominance of the Vulgate.”3 According to J. W. Knust, “the pericope was present only in a few copies of John in the early second century―which seems to be a likely conclusion given the patristic and manuscript evidence.”4 In a statement―often considered as the actual communis opinio―, B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Times of Samuel Prideaux Tregelles a Forgotten Scholar
    CHRISTIANITIES IN THE TRANS-ATLANTIC WORLD The Life and Times of Samuel Prideaux Tregelles A Forgotten Scholar Timothy C. F. Stunt Christianities in the Trans-Atlantic World Series Editors Crawford Gribben Department of History Queen’s University Belfast Belfast, UK Scott Spurlock Department of Theology and Religious Studies University of Glasgow Glasgow, UK Building upon the recent recovery of interest in religion in the early modern trans-Atlantic world, this series offers fresh, lively and inter- disciplinary perspectives on the broad view of its subject. Books in the series will work strategically and systematically to address major but under-studied or overly simplifed themes in the religious and cultural history of the trans-Atlantic. Editorial Board David Bebbington (University of Stirling) John Coffey (University of Leicester) Susan Hardman Moore (University of Edinburgh) Andrew Holmes (Queen’s University Belfast) John Morrill (University of Cambridge) Richard Muller (Calvin Theological Seminary) Mark Noll (University of Notre Dame) Dana L. Robert (Boston University) Arthur Williamson (California State University, Sacramento) More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14892 Timothy C. F. Stunt The Life and Times of Samuel Prideaux Tregelles A Forgotten Scholar Timothy C. F. Stunt Naples, FL, USA Christianities in the Trans-Atlantic World ISBN 978-3-030-32265-6 ISBN 978-3-030-32266-3 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32266-3 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifcally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microflms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Foster~Volume 1
    Bratich z Amassing the Multitude 1 1 The Multivalence of the Term “Original Text” in New Testament Textual Criticism Eldon Jay Epp Introduction ne hundred and ninety-one years ago, in 1808, Johann Leonhard Hug’s Introduction to the New Testament carried statements that, in part, may Ostrike textual critics as being far ahead of their time. Hug laments the loss of all the original manuscripts of the New Testament writings “so import- ant to the church” and wonders: “How shall we explain this singular fact?” Next, he observes that Paul and others employed secretaries, but Hug views the closing salutation, written in the author’s own hand, as “sufficient to give them the value of originals.” Then, referring to the further role that scribes and correctors must have played after such a Christian writing had been dictated by its author, he says: Let us now suppose, as it is very natural to do, that the same librarius [copyist] who was employed to make this copy, made copies likewise for opulent individuals and other churches – and there was no original at all, or there were perhaps ten or more [originals] of which none could claim superiority.1 A writing with no original? Or, with ten originals? And proposed by a scholar at the outset of the nineteenth century? Later Hug asserts that “the New Testament has had the peculiar fate of suffering more by intentional alterations than the Source: Harvard Theological Review, 92(3) (1999): 245–281. 2 New Testament Studies works of profane literature . and the heretics, to whom it would perhaps be attributed, had no share in it.”2 What he is saying by both assertions is that, because “strange things had happened in individual mss, even at this early period”3 (that is, before the mid-third century).
    [Show full text]
  • The Quest of the Historical Jesus
    The Quest of the Historical Jesus A Critical Study of its Progress from Reimarus to Wrede by Albert Schweitzer [ D. THEOL., D. PHIL., D. MED. ] Translated by W. Montgomery From the First German Edition "Von Reimarus zu Wrede," 1906. With a Preface by F. C. Burkitt, D.D. First English Edition, 1910. Published in Great Britain by A. & C. Black, Ltd. 2 Preface 1. The Problem 1 2. Hermann Samuel Reimarus 13 3. The Lives of Jesus of the Earlier Rationalism 27 4. The Earliest Fictitious Lives of Jesus 38 5. Fully Developed Rationalism - Paulus 48 6. The Last Phase of Rationalism - Hase and Schleiermacher 58 7. David Friedrich Strauss - The Man and his Fate 68 8. Strauss's First "Life of Jesus" 78 9. Strauss's Opponents and Supporters 96 10. The Marcan Hypothesis 121 11. Bruno Bauer 137 12. Further Imaginative Lives of Jesus 161 13. Renan 180 14. The "Liberal" Lives of Jesus 193 15. The Eschatological Question 223 16. The Struggle against Eschatology 242 17. Questions regarding the Aramaic Language, Rabbinic Parallels, and 270 Buddhistic Influence 18. The Position of the Subject at the Close of the Nineteenth Century 294 19. Thoroughgoing Scepticism and Thoroughgoing Eschatology 330 20. Results 398 3 PREFACE THE BOOK HERE TRANSLATED IS OFFERED TO THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING public in the belief that it sets before them, as no other book has ever done, the history of the struggle which the best-equipped intellects of the modern world have gone through in endeavouring to realise for themselves the historical personality of our Lord.
    [Show full text]
  • Apocalypse, Enlightenment, and the Beginnings of Salvation History: the Ce Umenical Friendship of J
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Theology Faculty Research and Publications Theology, Department of 4-1-2014 Apocalypse, Enlightenment, and the Beginnings of Salvation History: The cE umenical Friendship of J. J. Hess and A. Sandbichler Ulrich Lehner Marquette University, [email protected] Pro Ecclesia, Vol. 23, No. 2 (Spring 2014): 219-239. Publisher Link. APOCALYPSE, ENLIGHTENMENT, AND THE BEGINNINGS OE SALVATION HISTORY Hess and .[ .١ The Ecumenical Friendship of A. Sandbichler Ulrich L. Lehner Reading and interpreting tile book of Revelation has been one of the most controversial tasks in Catholic exegesis since the Council of Trent, while most followed the preterist interpretation of Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet (1627-1704) and saw in the biblical book predominantly a history of an- cient tim es-in particular of the persecution and the final victory of the church-som e remained convinced that it contained mostly information about fhe future state of the church.1 This future could, argued the futur- ists, be deduced from the text and a timetable of events constructed.* In the eighteenth century, interpretations changed dramatically. Futur- ism receded almost entirely and only made a comeback after the reign of terror during the French Revolution. Freterist interpretations were now preferred, and many exegetes attempted to build on the insights of Bossuet and improve his historical commentary. Yet some Catholic thinkers, who due to the increased quality of biblical scholarship during the eighteenth century became wary of simplistic preterist or futurist readings of Revela- tion, began to wonder whether a sound middle way between futurism and preterism existed, one that did justice to the theology of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muratorian Fragment: the State of Research
    JETS 57/2 (2014) 231–64 THE MURATORIAN FRAGMENT: THE STATE OF RESEARCH ECKHARD J. SCHNABEL* The fragmentary document known as “Canon Muratori” contains the oldest list of books of the NT. This essay will present the state of research regarding the Fragment, with particular attention to its date as wEll as its historical and theologi- cal significance. I. THE FRAGMENT The Muratorian Fragment consists of 85 lines; the beginning and probably the end are missing. The Fragment was discovered by Ludovico Antonio Muratori (1672–1750), an archivist and librarian at Modena, in the year 1700 in a manuscript in the Biblioteca Ambrosiana in Milan (Cod. Ambr. I 101 sup.), consisting of 76 leaves of coarse parchment. MuratOri publishEd thE FragmEnt in 1740 in thE third volume of his six-volume collection OF essays entitled Antiquitates italicæ mediiævi, in Dissertatio XLIII (cOls. 807–880) undEr thE hEading “De Literarum Statu, neglectu, & cultura in Italia post Barbaros in eam invEctos usque ad Annum Christi Millesi- mum Centesimum.”1 The manuscript originally bElonged to thE mOnastery at BobbiO in thE TrEb- bia River valley southwest of Piacenza in northern Italy. The manuscript contains a statement of Ownership by thE BObbiO mOnastEry: liber sti columbani de bobbio/Iohis grisostomi.2 ThE manuscript cOntains sEvEral thEOlogical treatisEs of thrEE thEOlogians * Eckhard J. SchnabEl is Mary F. ROckEFEllEr Distinguished Professor of NT Studies at Gordon- Conwell Theological Seminary, 130 EssEx StrEEt, SOuth HamiltOn, MA 01982. 1 LudOvicO AntOniO MuratOri, “DE LitErarum Statu, nEglEctu, & cultura in Italia pOst BarbarOs in eam invectos usquE ad Annum Christi Millesimum Centesimum,” in Antiquitates italicæ mediiævi: sive disser- tationes de moribus, ritibus, religione, regimine, magistratibus, legibus, studiis literarum, artibus, lingua, militia, nummis, principibus, libertate, servitute, fœderibus, aliisque faciem & mores italici populi referentibus post declinationem Rom.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Western Non-Interpolations: a Case for Luke Re-Editing His Gospel
    Rethinking the Western Non-interpolations: A Case For Luke Re-editing His Gospel by Giuseppe Capuana BA (Mus), GradDipEd, BTheol (Hons) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy University of Divinity 2018 Abstract This thesis presents a new paradigm for understanding the Western non-interpolations. It argues that when Luke originally wrote his Gospel it did not contain 22:19b–20; 24:3b, 6a, 12, 36b, 40, 51b and 52a. However, at a later time, around the time Luke wrote Acts, he returned to his Gospel creating a second edition which contained these readings. My thesis makes the case that the paradigm of scribal interpolation is problematic. Working under this paradigm the results of external and internal evidence appear conflicting and scholars are generally forced to give greater preference to one set of evidence over the other. However, a balanced weighting of the external and internal evidence points us towards the notion that Luke was responsible for both the absence and the inclusion of 22:19b–20; 24:3b, 6a, 12, 36b, 40, 51b and 52a. Chapter one introduces the Western non-interpolations. It also makes the case that the quest for the original text of Luke’s Gospel should not be abandoned. Chapter two is on the history, theory and methodology of the Western non-interpolations. It begins with an overview of the text-critical scholarship emerging during the nineteenth century, particularly the influence of Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort. It also covers the period after Westcott and Hort to the present.
    [Show full text]
  • The Date of the Muratorian Fragment: an Inference to the Best Explanation
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY RAWLINGS SCHOOL OF DIVINITY THE DATE OF THE MURATORIAN FRAGMENT: AN INFERENCE TO THE BEST EXPLANATION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE RAWLINGS SCHOOL OF DIVINITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY JOHN F. LINGELBACH LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA AUGUST 15, 2019 Copyright 2019 John F. Lingelbach All Rights Reserved i APPROVAL SHEET THE DATE OF THE MURATORIAN FRAGMENT: AN INFERENCE TO THE BEST EXPLANATION John F. Lingelbach Read and Approved by: Chairperson: ___ Ken Cleaver ________________ Reader: ___ Benjamin Laird ________________ Reader: ___Doug Taylor ________________ Date: ____________ ii For Kimberly iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................1 A Problem ............................................................................................................................1 Background of the Problem .....................................................................................1 Statement of the Problem .........................................................................................5 Significance of the Problem .....................................................................................5 Review of the Related Literature .........................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Text of the New Testament 2Nd Edit
    THE TEXT OF THE NEW TESTAMENT Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration BY BRUCE M. METZGER Professor of Mew Testament Language and Literature Princeton Theological Seminary SECOND EDITION OXFORD AT THE CLARENDON PRESS Preface to the Second Edition During the four years that have elapsed since the initial publication of this book in 1964, a great amount of textual research has continued to come from the presses in both Europe and America. References to some of these publications were included in the German translation of the volume issued in 1966 under the title Der Text des Neuen Test- aments; Einftihrung in die neutestamentliche Textkritik (Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart) . The second printing of the English edition provides opportunity to introduce a variety of small alterations throughout the volume as well as to include references to more than one hundred and fifty books and articles dealing with Greek manuscripts, early versions, and textual studies of recently discovered witnesses to the text of the New Testament. In order not to disturb the pagination, most of the new material has been placed at the close of the book (pp. 261-73), to which the reader's attention is directed by appropriate cross references. BRUCE M. METZGER February ig68 Preface The necessity of applying textual criticism to the books of the New Testament arises from two circumstances : (a) none of the original documents is extant, and (b) the existing copies differ from one another. The textual critic seeks to ascer- tain from the divergent copies which form of the text should be regarded as most nearly conforming to the original.
    [Show full text]