sign in sign up
<<
Home , Calvert Watkins, Comana (Cappadocia), Kizzuwatna, Theano, Wilusa

From to ? , Piyamaradu, and Anatolian Ritual in *

SARAH MORRIS University of , The sixth book of Homer’s has long attracted attention for its embedded narratives, including traditions that sound native to . When Glaukos of meets in battle, their family histories prevent them from engag- ing as enemies, once they recognize each other as guest-friends (Il. 6.119–236). A long digression on Glaukos’s ancestors recounts the stirring story of his grand- father, the hero Bellerophon, and the monster Chimaera, set in Lycia in clearly Hellenized tales of a “snake-slayer” (slayer of the illuyankas-serpent) long native to Anatolia.1 Like the death and transport to Lycia of Sarpedon in Iliad 16, nar- rated in Anatolian language, or the funeral of Patroklos with its close conver- gences with Hittite royal burials, this passage reveals how Greek epic poetry can incorporate foreign traditions for ritual procedures set on Anatolian soil.2 Another Iliad 6 episode long seen as Hellenic—the Trojan propitiation of —allows us to unpack its connections with Bronze Age ritual in Anatolia, in tribute to the model of “demic diffusion” articulated so well by the late Calvert Watkins. For in addition to teaching us how to kill a dragon, and how to be a dragon, this book of the Iliad teaches Hellenic heroes and poets how to stop an enemy in Anatolian fashion. The propitiation of Athena by the women of Troy is an episode long suspect to Hellenists for its highly Athenian details of cult. In this essay, I will try to demonstrate that the motivation for this special prayer, its su- pervision by the queen, performance by a priestess, assistance by female elders, and special phrases all shadow closely patterns in Anatolian royal and ritual pro- cedures, seen in both text and art, in both East and West. 1. Trojan prayers in Homer To recall the action and setting: the rampage of Diomedes in Iliad 5 sends one Trojan back to their citadel for a special plea to their gods; this unites with his mother, wife, son, brother, and brother-in-law, in intimate family scenes that

* This effort is dedicated with affection and gratitude to the memory of Calvert Watkins. 1 Watkins 1995 (especially 404, 444, 448ff. on the illuyankas-myths), Katz 1998. 2 Watkins 2008, Högemann and Oettinger 2008.

Stephanie W. Jamison, H. Craig Melchert, and Brent Vine (eds.). 2013. Proceedings of the 24th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference. Bremen: Hempen. 151–67. 152 Sarah Morris prove to be his final, living moments with them in the poem. How this action is initiated is telling: the seer Helenos (son of , first introduced here in the Iliad) urges his brother Hektor to return to the city for a special appeal to Athena (6.73–118). The Trojan prince is to bid their mother, Hekabe, to gather the “old women,” ascend to the acropolis, unlock the doors of the and offer her finest peplos to Athena by placing it on her knees. This offering is intended to accompany and enforce a vow: twelve cattle will be sacrificed, if the goddess takes pity on Troy and holds back Diomedes (86–97). These instructions (deliv- ered in a single long sentence) are repeated by Hektor to his mother (269–78), but carried out by the priestess Theano with a prayer to the goddess in direct speech, after Hekabe chooses a fine cloth to offer Athena (286–310). Alas, the goddess hears their prayer but refuses it (311), one of many signs of divine favor towards the Greeks in their war against Troy. This passage harbors distinctively Anatolian features, beginning with the role of the queen in propitiating on behalf of her people. In Greek myth and cult, women serve as priestesses, either as a term of youthful service, or in lifetime offices tied to leading families and/or local politics (e.g., the Pythia).3 But to in- volve the wife of the king in such a role seems to be a specific reflection of the kind of role played in Hittite Anatolia by a number of royal women, in particular by Puduḫepa, wife of Ḫattušili III (1267–1237 BC) as well as daughter of the priest of Ishtar in Kizzuwatna.4 The Hittite queen, just like the king, was the chief celebrant in the Hittite state cult (there being no separate high priest or priestess).5 We shall see how Puduḫepa in particular may have shaped the epic role of wom- en in cult: for the moment, the way male members of the royal family at Troy involve the queen in cult seems to reflect such an ancient practice, or more perti- nently, the way a Greek poet imagined that a royal family in Anatolia should be- have in terms of cult practices and practitioners. As in other Homerica, this role of queen as priestess also has Aegean prece- dents. Independently, Margalit Finkelberg and Kenneth Atchity with Elizabeth Barber argued that aspects of royal succession in capture pat-

3 Connelly 2007. 4 Darga 1974; Otten 1975; Bin-Nun 1975; Taggar-Cohen 2006: 380–92, 444–5 (royal priest- hood). 5 The queen could hold the title of šiwanzanna-, written logographically as (MUNUS)AMA .DINGIR-LIM (literally ‘mother of god’), but there is no indication that this was a regular part of her office or that the šiwanzanna- had a unique role as high priestess. On this word see now CHD Š: 489–92. From Kizzuwatna to Troy? 153 terns of descent from a king through his daughter, and that such patterns are rein- forced by the hereditary role of priestess retained since the Aegean Bronze Age.6 Comparison of this kinship line with the peculiar institution of the tawananna in Hittite (or even Hattian) Anatolia may even bring this Aegean pattern into closer relation with those of Anatolia.7 These patterns survive in Greek myth, on the one hand, in the strong line of descent via daughter of the king (thus Helen is heir to the kingdom of Sparta), whose exogamy brings in a foreign-born prince as the next king (Menelaos from Argos; more distantly in other cities, Pelops from Lyd- ia, Kadmos of Phoenicia, etc.). On the other hand, this descent survives in cult in various forms of hereditary priestess-hood retained by noble families in the Iron Age, which may preserve Bronze Age privileges. In the , Penelope prays to Athena for the safe return of her son (4.759–67), and the wife of pre- sides at a sacrifice to Poseidon at Pylos (3.450–2). Whether shadowy or strong in early Greece, memories of such patterns and/or familiarity with living examples may have helped make Hekabe a priestess, as well as a queen. However appropriate her role in Anatolia, Hekabe as queen is displaced by an actual priestess, Theano, never invoked by Helenos or Hektor in the initial instructions but introduced in line 304, as the one who bears the key and opens the temple door. It seems that an Anatolian, Aegean tradition (queen as priestess) has been updated, and the queen upstaged, to foreground the role of an actual priestess, Theano, a type of figure familiar to a Greek audience since the Bronze Age (cf. the priestess E-ri-ta, PY Ep 704). For as holder of the keys to a sanctu- ary, Theano also incorporates a proper Bronze Age functionary in , listed in addition to the priestess in the Mycenaean Greek text just re- ferred to (PY Ep 704.7 ka-ra-wi-po-ro /klāwiphoros/ ‘key-bearer’). It is signifi- cant that the poet adds an extra line (300) to explain how the Trojans made her (ἔθηκαν) priestess (ἱέρεια) of Athena, as if to justify her intrusion into the royal propitiation. And clearly, as a wife and mother, she serves as priestess under cir- cumstances unusual in later Greek terms. Thus her appearance in the Iliad is intrusive: as Kirk notes in his commen- tary, “Theano, then, is a curious innovation”; in fact, “No other priestess is - tioned in Homer.”8 Priam’s daughter, Kassandra, is a marriageable bride in the Iliad (13.365) and a sister mourning her brother (24.699), rather than a virgin or

6 Finkelberg 1991, Atchity and Barber 1987. 7 Finkelberg 1997, Uchitel 2007. 8 Kirk 1990:165. 154 Sarah Morris priestess of as in later narrative; thus Theano’s appearance in Bronze Age epic is striking, if not anomalous. The next priestess in Greek literature occupies a throne in Athena’s temple on the archaic Acropolis (Hdt. 5.72), while in art, the figure of a priestess (e.g., the Pythia at Delphi) is often identified by her age and/or the temple key she wields. In western Greek art, Theano sometimes ap- pears in scenes of Ajax assaulting Kassandra at the statue of Athena, in her Ho- meric role at Athena’s sanctuary.9 But Theano first appears on an early Greek (Corinthian) vase, the so-called Astarita krater in the Vatican, the only depiction of the Greek embassy sent to request the return of Helen early in the , from the lost epic poem, the Cypria.10 Mentioned briefly in the Iliad (11.138–42), the visit is recalled by Theano’s husband, , who tells Helen herself, in the Teichoscopia (Il. 3.205–24), of receiving these Greek guests. A fuller version of the episode in a lost poem by Bacchylides (“Sons of Antenor” or the Request for Helen) gives Theano a prominent role, as priestess of Athena, along with fifty sons (some on this vase). At left, , Menelaos, and Talthybios wait on the walls of Troy, or possibly on the steps of an altar. They are approached by Theano followed by three females, labeled , Malo, and a nurse (“Trophos”), then a number of named horsemen, including at least two of her sons, presumably to protect her from the enemy. Of the three females, “Dia” is a name for a divine attendant, like Theano. “Malo” (Mēlō) is likewise a common , but I would like to compare it to an Anatolian deity, Malis or Maliya, invoked by Hipponax (fr. 40 West), and glossed by Hesychius (s.v.) as a local name for Athena. A slave of the Lydian queen Omphale also carries this name, and in Lycia Malis is the “native equivalent of Athena.”11 Her Hittite ancestor, DMaliya, probably of older Anatoli- an ancestry (Nesite?), was associated with gardens, rivers, as “Mother of wine and grain,” with a temple in Kizzuwatna where she is equated with Ishtar.12 In a Greek lyric fragment (PLF fr. incert. 17) recently appreciated by Watkins, “Malis” is described as spinning, an attractive complement to an archaic ivory “spinner” figure from . The third figure, “Trophos” or nurse, distin- guished by her white hair as aged, may be Aithra, nurse of Helen and mother of Theseus, captured from Attica when Helen’s brothers returned her to Sparta,

9 Moret 1975:22–3; Connelly 2007:92–104, figs. 4.14–16; Parker 1998 on Herodotus 5.72. 10 Beazley 1958, Kaltsas and Shapiro 2008:196–7. 11 Melchert 2004:36, as cited by Watkins 2008:122. 12 Haas 1994:156, 273–4, 410–11, 855–56; Watkins 2007:123; Hawkins 2013:126–9. From Kizzuwatna to Troy? 155 whose recovery from Troy was celebrated in Athenian myth and art. But none of these three play a role in extant Greek literature on the Trojan war, and I suspect Anatolian origins. Let us examine the name of Theano herself, for its Anatolian echoes. Clearly theophoric in Greek, it is borrowed for later priestesses in Athens and Argos (Plut. Alc. 22; IG II2 3634, a Roman arrephoros), echoed in others (Theonoe in Euripides’ Helen, etc.), and is a “paradigmatic name for a priestess.”13 I would like to offer a more distant, if speculative, comparison to similar names in Anato- lia. In the first instance, one thinks of the ritual specialist Tunnawi(ya), author of at least five of the so-called Kizzuwatna rituals, most of them “wholly Anatolian” (i.e., Hittite-Luwian) rather than a mixture of Hurrian, Luwian, and Mesopotami- an rituals. In at least one Hittite text (KBo 21.1–5, I 1), Tunnawi hails from Hat- tusas, in others from “Dunna” (?).14 Other possible Anatolian inspirations for Theano’s name (Θεανώ < *Θεϝανώ?) as well as her duties include the distinc- tive title tawananna, discussed earlier for its particular place and function in Ana- tolian royal succession. Did a Greek poet invent Theano’s name by hearing and Hellenizing an Anatolian name or a title, once hereditary in agnatic kinship but also embracing a cult function? One reason for bringing Theano’s name closer to Anatolia is the epithet that follows it in Homer. Her family and origin are expressed in what is assumed to be a patronymic, Kissēis, “daughter of Kissēs,” a figure who appears in Iliad 11 when slays one of her sons, , grand-son (and son-in-law) of Kissēs, a king of . (I doubt it anticipates South Persian Kissios [Hdt. 5.49, Aeschylus Pers. 120, Ch. 423], for Kashu/Kassites.) But what if a different kind of adjective qualifies her? Kissēis, whose spelling and versification suggest some form of *Kissēw-is, could also be “Kissew-an,” if Theano comes from a place in Anatolia known to Greeks at least by an initial term. The obvious candidate, abbreviated in Greek, would be Kizzuwatna, the province of southeastern Anatolia annexed by the Hit- tites in the late Empire, and home to powerful cult traditions centered on the Storm God, Teshub, and the goddess Inanna/Ishtar, as well as Ḫebat. As the orig- inal home of Puduḫepa, queen and supreme priestess in the 13th century, and as the locale of distinctive cult traditions (Hurrian, Mesopotamian and Anatolian), this ethnic epithet—often added to Puduḫepa’s name, “daughter of the land of

13 Sourvinou-Inwood 1988:35, Connelly 2007:70 n.90. 14 Goetze 1938; Hutter 1988; Miller 2004:452, 458 (origins south of the Maraššanta river). 156 Sarah Morris

Kizzuwatna”—would make Theano the bearer of special cult practices native to southeast Anatolia, celebrated in the Hittite world. However, I owe to Petra Goedegebuure the excellent suggestion that this word may be, instead, an attempt to render in Greek the Hittite persona ḫašau- wa-, sometimes translated as “midwife” for its function in Hittite birth texts and putative etymology (‘engender’),15 but more generally a female ritual practition- er.16 Otten’s understanding of this term (1952:231–4) as a phonetic reading of the Sumerogram MUNUSŠU.GI “old woman” makes it even more plausible as a Hel- lenized term, by bringing it closer to the phrase “borrowed” from Anatolia in this passage (below). Following Kretschmer (and Gladstone) to make Homer’s Ketei- oi (Od. 11.521, “Mysian” allies of the Trojans) Hellenic memories of distant Ḫatti, we have a parallel for reading the initial consonant in Greek (ḫ > k). This would turn another title into a proper name (whether or not Homer makes it/him Thracian), in a literal of a noun-agent into a personal name or nominal epithet, masking Theano’s Anatolian function. In some Hittite texts, Tunnawiya is also called ḫašauwaš (KUB VII 53 + XII 58 I1, IV 44), and even Puduḫepa gives herself this title in prayers where she serves as (metaphorical) ritual minis- trant for the health of her family (KUB XXI 27 II 15–23). Further circumstances and terminology characterize this Trojan episode as Anatolian: next, in the role assigned to the “old women” (Il. 6.87: geraiai) whom Hektor is to assemble with his mother in the instructions issued by Helenos. Hek- abe gathers these together (6.287) after calling her attendants (amphipoloi, clearly separate figures associated with ritual in Homer: Od. 4.760, etc.), and they follow her (296: metesseuonto) to the citadel. The plural female form of the adjective for “old” is unique here in Homer, as if invented for the occasion.17 Once again, I would argue for an origin in Anatolian ritual, given the special name and role of the “old woman” (ŠU.GI) with ritual powers and functions.18 Such figures appear both as practitioners, but also as authors and/or performers of specific rites. Thus the Sumerogram MUNUSŠU.GI or “old woman” is linked with a high number of

15 Beckman 1983:232–5, 270. Otten (19562:234) also accepts the etymology from ḫaš(š)- ‘en- gender, give birth’, despite equating ḫašawa- with MUNUSŠU.GI. 16 Puhvel (1991:229) explicitly rejects any connection of ḫašawa- with ḫaš(š)- on the proper grounds of the single -š- (all derivatives of ḫaš(š)- have a geminate) and the fact that the attest- ed verbal noun of ḫaš(š)- is ḫaššumar. It could not be *ḫašawar. Kloekhorst (2008:319–21) also implicitly rejects the connection, since he does not list ḫašawa- under ḫaš(š)-. 17 Lorimer 1950:443 calls this term another Athenian trait; Graziosi and Haubold 2010:99–100. 18 Miller 2004:10. From Kizzuwatna to Troy? 157 ritual texts. While they practice solo in Hittite ritual texts, they can be referred to collectively in the third person, in other contexts (as when Ḫattušili I complains about their influence over his wife, in the Hittite-Akkadian bilingual text: KUB 1.16, iii/iv 64 ff.).19 Having assembled a full female panoply of ritual power—Anatolian queen, Greek priestess, and local “old women”—the Trojan party is now ready to per- form their appeal to the chief city goddess, Athena. First, the queen chooses her finest piece of cloth from the deepest recesses of her treasury, one that “shines like a star.” Then they proceed to the citadel, where Theano the key-holder opens the door of the temple (nēos), and they begin their prayer. Raising their hands, all of the women (pasai: queen, priestess, geraiai, amphipoloi?) utter a ritual cry, ololygē: this special term marks many a Homeric episode when women partici- pate in a sacrifice, prayer, or vow, including the two Odyssey passages where a queen (Penelope, Eurydice) presides (4.767, 3.450). Long associated with the discomfort and guilt that modern scholars imagined behind ancient animal sacri- fice, this term has regained something closer to its ancient meaning since Billie Jean Collins compared it to the Hittite ritual cry for such occasions, palwai-.20 Greek contexts mark this cry of ololygē as a song of triumph (Aesch. Th. 367– 70), victory (Aesch. Ag. 594–7), appeal to the gods for their attention and help (Eur. fr. 351), or simply joy and celebration attending a sacrifice, vow or prayer, as in passages cited above. This ritual cry is followed by the gift to the goddess of a valuable cloth; while this invokes later Greek practices, it is also familiar in Anatolia: in one text, a royal divine dream is interpreted by a woman, Hepapiya (a priestess?), to mean that one should give a garment to a deity (KUB 15.5+48.122 i 7–9; de Roos 2007:71 and 80). In both instructions and completion in Homer (Il. 6.92, 277, 302–3), the peplos is placed “on her knees,” a phrase that has long puzzled read- ers of Homer and archaeologists. For it implies a seated statue of the goddess, and calls for comparison to archaic Athenian images, such as the one signed by Endoios and seen near the Erechtheion on the Acropolis by Pausanias (1.26.4), long associated with a marble Athena, seated and armed, found in 1821.21 Specu- lation about this statue is connected to discussion of the Homeric prayer and the

19 Collectively, “old women” of Liḫzina, in the Luwian ritual of Zuwi (CTH 412) and in the Nuntarriyašḫa festival (CTH 626); Haas 1994:888–9. 20 Collins 1995. 21 Akropolis 625: Morris 2001:148–50, fig. 11. 158 Sarah Morris offering of a peplos, as both an anachronism and an Athenian one, or even an interpolation by Peisistratid Athens into the Iliad.22 Most Athena statues depicted at Troy in Greek and Roman art are standing armed figures, like the ones who try (and fail) to protect Kassandra from assault by Locrian Ajax.23 The tradition of the Trojan Palladion, an image of Athena stolen by Diomedes and Odysseus, is hard to see as a heavy seated statue plus throne, a further problem in this passage for Greek audiences. Instead, we should imagine, behind this Trojan Athena, examples of seated goddesses in Bronze Age Anatolia. Small portable images could have survived and traveled over time and space, like the gold statuette in the Schimmel collec- tion, perhaps the kind vowed in Hittite prayers, while Hittite monuments were long visible to later observers, such as the rock-cut relief of king and queen propi- tiating gods at Fraktin.24 In it, two Anatolian deities (labeled Ḫebat and Teshub in 12th-c. Luwian hieroglyphs) are enthroned, receiving libations poured out before them by the king and queen (Ḫattušilis III and Puduḫepa) or offerings (bread, etc.) placed on tables in front of their seat. While seated clay figurines exist in Mycenaean art, and seated goddesses accept libations and offerings (including textiles) in Aegean frescoes and glyptic, perhaps our poet set his Trojan scene in Anatolian terms, with a seated goddess receiving offerings “on her knees.” 2. Hittite prayers After offering the peplos to Athena at Troy in Iliad 6, Theano raises her voice in prayer, delivering six lines of hexameter with a typical vow: the promise of twelve cattle (unbroken heifers), if the goddess will take pity on the Trojans and break the spear of Diomedes (6.305–10). “πότνι᾽ Ἀθηναίη ἐρυσίπτολι δῖα θεάων 305 ἆξον δὴ ἔγχος Διομήδεος, ἠδὲ καὶ αὐτὸν πρηνέα δὸς πεσέειν Σκαιῶν προπάροιθε πυλάων, ὄφρά τοι αὐτίκα νῦν δυοκαίδεκα βοῦς ἐνὶ νηῷ ἤνις ἠκέστας ἱερεύσομεν, αἴ κ᾽ ἐλεήσῃς ἄστύ τε καὶ Τρώων ἀλόχους καὶ νήπια τέκνα.” 310

22 Lorimer 1950:442–9, Graziosi and Haubold 2010:27–9, 99–101. 23 Moret 1975:11-16. 24 See http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/1989.281.12 (small gold pendant with a child “on the knees” of a goddess); http://www.hittitemonuments.com/fraktin/ for relief at Fraktin and Ḫebat’s title as an enthroned goddess: Otten 1975:21; Haas 1994:388. From Kizzuwatna to Troy? 159

“O lady Athena, our city’s defender, shining among goddesses, break the spear of Diomedes, and grant that the man be hurled on his face in front of the Skaian gates; so may we instantly dedicate within your shrine twelve heifers, yearlings, never broken, if only you will have pity on the town of Troy, and the Trojan wives, and their innocent children.” This prayer addresses Athena as Potnia (a prehistoric cult title in Mycenaean Greece, but otherwise a title in Homer, like wanax, for royal personages), with a vow to sacrifice in thanks if the plea be granted, all the more poignant as it is re- fused. Once individual features of the ritual in the Iliad are revisited as Anatolian, it remains to link this prayer to Bronze Age Anatolia. A newly published Hittite text offers a set of special prayers delivered by an unnamed Hittite queen (proba- bly Puduḫepa) in the form of vows (oxen, sheep, plus special Hittite offerings, golden images), if the deities addressed fulfill her requests. The text (KUB 56.15 = CTH 590) includes several separate appeals in the first person (direct speech), tailored to specific deities and their locales: first, a prayer for well-being for the king (a common concern for the queen) which promises sacrifices to a moun- tain[?]; a short tribute to Teshub and Ḫebat (in an unknown town), then a vow to “the goddess, my lady” for well-being. There follow two texts in the third person, which record how the Queen went to Izziya (classical Issos, identified with Kinet Höyük in ) to pray to the sea, and then speak a second prayer at Kummanni (Comana, in ). Both prayers are then cited in direct speech, but it is their object which attracts our attention: the queen prays to the Sea to “[deliver] Piyamaradu to me so that he does not elude my grasp”; at Kummanni: “If you seize Piyamaradu (alone?), [I will give you a] bird of gold, and a unit of time [of gold]. Piyamaradu [will?] it/them …” before our text breaks off.25 Who was Piyamaradu, and why does his activity cause such concern in the royal house of Ḫatti, generating more than one kind of special prayer? Hitherto largely known in letters and other diplomatic texts, he poses a major nuisance to the Hittite monarchy and their various western vassals and allies, over a life- time of extraordinary longevity and supreme annoyance to successive kings of Ḫatti. For his name appears in documents associated with four successive Hittite rulers, from Muršili II or Muwatalli II (in the Letter of Manapa-Tarḫuntas), to the time of Ḫattušili III (if P’s name is restored in Ḫattušili’s annals, CTH 82, and

25 De Roos 2007:240–3; Beckman, Bryce, and Cline 2011:248–52, AhT 26 (the version cited here). 160 Sarah Morris assuming Ḫattušili III is the author of the Tawagalawa letter, CTH 181). Thus he was not only long-lived, lasting over thirty years, but effective in his ability to cause trouble at some distance from the Hittite heartland. In the earliest texts with his name (KUB 14.1 + KBo 19.79), he attacked and Lazpa (Troy and Lesbos?), carrying off craftsmen (šaripitu), and alienates the loyalty of Atpa, king of Millawanda (), away from the Hittite king. In one of the latest texts (KUB 14.3 = CTH 181), resolving a dispute between Hittite and Aḫḫiyawa kings over Wilusa, Piyamaradu is protected by the king of Aḫḫiyawa and flees over the sea with 7,000 captives.26 As “a rebellious subject petitioning for a new vassal kingdom,” he openly did not toe the Ḫatti line in practice.27 What is striking about this prayer and its potential for understanding scenes in Homer is how an historical figure, who threatens or annoys the stability of the Hittite monarchy, has become a target of intercession by a Hittite queen. More than any other feature of this passage in Iliad 6, it suggests a powerful parallel if not precedent for the Trojan prayer, in that the queen herself intervenes to save her husband’s kingdom against a foreign intruder. Like the scrap of Luwian epic with an adventure set at “steep Wilusa,” the new Hittite prayer may simply reveal that in Anatolia, as well as the Aegean, historical encounters fed poetic and ritual narratives.28 But Puduḫepa’s prayers could prefigure the Trojan appeal in Iliad 6, in the same way that other features of this passage, and other Homeric episodes, are enriched by contact with Anatolia. Perhaps we should not be surprised, once we accept the high level of concern raised by the activities of Piyamaradu for both the Hittite king as well as the queen. For while she was making special intercessions with her divine patroness to stop the rebel, her husband, King Ḫattušili III, was making diplomatic over- tures of unprecedented generosity and courtesy to his Aḫḫiyawa counterpart. On only one occasion did a Hittite king refer to such an Aḫḫiyawa leader as “my brother, my equal,” even a “great king.” As Trevor Bryce has recently argued, it is no coincidence that this lavish tribute appears only once, when the king of the Ḫatti has been unable to stop Piyamaradu by means of force, and has turned to diplomacy to flatter the Aḫḫiyawa into a supportive alliance against the rebel

26 If Piyamaradu was captured (KBo 16.35, 7: Gurney 2002:136) during the reign of Muwatalli, thus ending his activity, his name cannot be restored in the annals of Ḫattušili III. 27 Gurney 2002:136–7. 28 Watkins 1986:58–61. From Kizzuwatna to Troy? 161 who refused to be a loyal vassal king.29 Thus the career of Piyamaradu inspired unusual measures both diplomatic and ritual, by both king and queen.

3. Anatolian interfaces Within the corpus of Bronze Age texts detailing campaigns, cease-fires, embas- sies and overtures, prayers and curses, lie events that later Greek poets turned into epic encounters and episodes of the Trojan War. In support, let us recall how closely Ḫatti and Aḫḫiyawa were intertwined, how early, and where their encoun- ters took place. Since the time of /II, these encounters involved not only diplomatic correspondence with vassal kings (where Aḫḫiyawa are cited as third parties), but more vivid archaeological testimonia for interaction. At least one king (Tudḫaliya I/II?) captured a foreign sword from battles in Aššuwa (west) and dedicated it to the Storm God at Ḫattušas. The most recent re- study of the weapon—once seen as “Aegean,” for its close resemblance to a Type B sword—compares details of its hilt, tang, and riveting technique to weapons from Syria-Cilicia, especially Byblos, and finds even closer relatives in Anatolia itself, at Alaca Höyük. What is most striking is that its alleged Aegean relative, the Type B sword, was first identified at Mycenae, where many were found by Schliemann in the Shaft Graves, that is to say, in the early Mycenaean period (15th c).30 These important graves also offer us the most explicit Hittite import to Mycenaean Greece: a silver vessel in the shape of a stag, once a Hittite bibru but pierced for use as an Aegean rhyton, found in Circle A, Grave V.31 If it made its way to a Mycenaean ruler as a diplomatic “greeting gift” (in the Akkadian termi- nology of the later Amarna letters), it puts kings of Aḫḫiyawa and Ḫatti on formal and friendly terms as “brothers,” if not fellow “Great Kings,” early on. If this valuable object reached a wealthy grave by other means—as booty, piracy, ran- som, or trophy claimed by an early Mycenaean soldier of fortune—then we can imagine a different relationship between Anatolia and the Aegean, one based on warfare rather than diplomacy.32 Since both kinds of interaction appear in other textual evidence, and we have just examined how at least one Hittite king tried both force and diplomacy against his non-Hittite neighbors, both are plausible.

29 Bryce 2003. 30 Taracha 2003. 31 Koehl 1995. 32 As described in Morris 1989. 162 Sarah Morris

I would like to probe these Aegean burials more closely for other Hittite con- nections in ritual. As long recognized, the burial of Patroklos on Trojan soil (Iliad 23) mirrors in many ways the stages of a Hittite royal funeral.33 In particular, Day 3 of the šalliš waštaiš, when the funeral pyre is extinguished with wine and beer, the bones gathered, anointed with oil and wrapped in cloth, seems to echo specif- ic steps outlined in the Iliad. But even more striking than literary comparanda is the material evidence from Mycenae for practices in the same text: gold and elec- trum face-masks from both grave circles at Mycenae compare to the gold pūriyal- placed over the mouth and gold šakuwa- placed over the eyes of the Hittite dead, on Day 2 (KUB XXXIX 22, ii 2–4, 58–9). In related funeral texts, a gold cup is held up to the deceased (KUB XXX 23+ ii 11–16), and a clay cup is smashed to the ground (XXX 23+ iii 40), both types of vessels found in abundance in the Shaft Graves (including clay cups broken above the graves). Finally, a pair of gold scales from Grave III at Mycenae calls to mind how an “old woman” uses a pair of scales to weigh something made of clay (?) against gold and silver (KUB XXX.15, 1–33). Since Mycenae was excavated decades before Hittite texts were deciphered, funerary scales of gold and their Homeric complement, the psy- chostasia (Il. 22.208–13), were readily compared to practices in the Egyptian Book of the Dead, not in Anatolia. Let us recall that, as Hektor leaves the battle- field for the city of Troy to deliver his brother’s request for a special prayer, he wears an early Mycenaean “tower shield” of the kind worn in art of the Shaft Grave period (Il. 6.116–7).34 Ultimately, convergences between Mycenaean and Hittite traits appear over many centuries. These early Mycenaean links suggest connections across the Aegean since the 15th century, whether hostile or in the migration of practices, perhaps through intermarriage or relocation of captives and craftsmen, in both directions. As I have argued, such connections might have brought a “Potnia Aswiya” to Mycenaean Pylos in the Late Bronze Age, and left lasting traces of her Anatolian counterpart at Ephesus (Bronze Age Apasas) in the cult image of Ephesia.35 A different kind of connection exposed Greek poets to Anatolian terms and practices that outlived the Bronze Age, particularly in western Asia Minor (home to later Greek cities) and in the southeast in Cilicia. In the west, Bronze Age

33 For the most recent edition of this text, see Kassian, Korolëv, and Sidel'tsev 2002; discussion in Rutherford 2007. 34 Lorimer 1950:132–92, Stubbings 1962:510–13, Kirk 1990:169–70. 35 Morris 2001. From Kizzuwatna to Troy? 163 monuments and figures were “read” as Egyptian (Hdt. 2.106), their Luwian hier- oglyphs in royal titles applied to later kings like Midas of .36 In the south- east, Greek legends (Mopsos) and names in cuneiform texts appear in another important arena for the afterlife of Hittite culture—in reliefs and texts still visi- ble.37 Recently scholars have directed our focus towards the transmission of Bronze Age Anatolian ritual formulae to Greek poetics, via both practitioners who performed ritual and in monuments that displayed them, in these two prima- ry areas for “Anatolian interfaces” from East to West.38 When royal power and fortified citadels declined, survivors relocated to southeast Anatolia and North Syria in a Neo-Hittite revival of Bronze Age kingdoms, and more modest practi- tioners survived among regional and rural communities that outlived the Bronze Age, continued to apply their skills, and taught them to descendants, apprentices, and later generations. This would explain the high incidence of surviving Hethiti- ca in Greek ritual—burials, prayers, hymns, oaths, curses, cures—if performance long outlasted the 2nd millennium BC. And it may clarify some puzzles in our Homeric text with Hittite precedents, transformed as always into something de- liberately Greek in its afterlife. In the Trojan prayer to Athena, a Greek poet ima- gines how the deity responded, something absent in Hittite prayers (although one may ask a god to “lend an ear” and offer votive ears of gold and silver: KUB 15.1 ii 25–7), but crucial in an epic tradition where divine favor is essential to the ac- tion. In quest of that favor, the Trojans mustered many an Anatolian title, term, prayer, and practice—in a passage where a high number of foreign, prehistoric borrowings seem to be clustered—only to receive a divine, Greek denial.

References

Atchity, Kenneth and Elizabeth Barber. 1987. Greek Princes and Aegean Princesses: The Role of Women in the Homeric Poems. In Kenneth Atchity, Ron Hogart and Doug Price (eds.), Critical Essays on Homer, 15–36. Boston: Hall. Bachvarova, Mary. 2002. From Hittite to Homer: The Role of Anatolians in the Trans- mission of Epic and Prayer Motifs from the Near East to the Greeks. Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago. Beazley, John. 1958. Ἑλένης Ἀπαίτησις. Proceedings of the British Academy 43.233–44.

36 Morris 2003:10–13 on Midas. 37 Oettinger 2011 on Mopsos in Cilicia; Schmitz 2009 on Greek names at . 38 Bachvarova 2002:43–56, Collins 2003, Rutherford 2006, López-Ruiz 2010, Collins, Bach- varova, and Rutherford 2008. 164 Sarah Morris

Beckman, Gary. 1983. Hittite Birth Rituals2. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Beckman, Gary, Richard Beal, and Gregory McMahon (eds.). 2003. Hittite Studies in Honor of Harry A. Hoffner, Jr. on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns Beckman, Gary, Trevor R. Bryce, and Eric H. Cline (eds.). 2011. The Ahhiyawa Texts. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. Bryce, Trevor. 2003. Relations Between Ḫatti and Aḫḫiyawa in the Last Decades of the Bronze Age. In Beckman, Beal, and McMahon 2003, 59–72. CHD Š = Güterbock, Hans G.†, Harry A. Hoffner, Jr., and Theo P. J. van den Hout. 2002–2013. The Hittite Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chi- cago Š. Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. Collins, Billie Jean. 1995. Greek ὀλολύζω and Hittite palwai-: Exultation in the Ritual Slaughter of Animals. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 36/4.319–25. ———. 2010. Hittite Religion and the West. In Yoram Cohen, Amir Gilan, and Jared L. Miller (eds.), Pax Hethitica: Studies on the and Their Neighbours in Honour of Itamar Singer, 54–66. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Collins, Billie Jean, Mary R. Bachvarova, and Ian C. Rutherford (eds.). 2008. Anatolian Interfaces: Hittites, Greeks and Their Neighbors. Proceedings of an International Conference on Cross-Cultural Interaction, September 17–19, 2004, Emory Universi- ty, Atlanta, Ga. Oxford: Oxbow. Connelly, Joan. 2007. Portrait of a Priestess: Women and Ritual in . Princeton: Princeton University Press. Darga, Muhibbe. 1974. Puduḫepa: An Anatolian Queen of the Thirteenth Century B.C. In Mélanges Mansel II, 939–61. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basimevi. Espermann, Ingeborg. 1980. Antenor, Theano, Antenoriden. Ihre Person und Bedeutung in der Ilias. Meisenheim am Glan: Hain. Finkelberg, Margalit. 1991. Royal Succession in Heroic Greece. Classical Quarterly 41/2.303–16. ———. 1997. The Brother’s Son of Tawananna and Others: The Rule of Dynastic Suc- cession in the Old Hittite Kingdom. Cosmos 13.127–41. Goetze, Albrecht. 1938. The Hittite Ritual of Tunnawi. New Haven: American Oriental Society. ———. 1940. Kizzuwatna and the Problem of Hittite Geography. New Haven: Yale Uni- versity Press. Graziosi, Barbara, and Johannes Haubold. 2010. Homer “Iliad” VI. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press. Hawkins, Shane. 2013. Studies in the Language of Hipponax. Bremen: Hempen. Heinhold-Kramer, Susanne. 1983. Untersuchungen zu Piyamaradu (1). Orientalia 52.81– 97. ———. 1986. Untersuchungen zu Piyamaradu (2). Orientalia 55.47–62. From Kizzuwatna to Troy? 165

Högemann, Peter and Norbert Oettinger. 2008. Die Seuche im Heerlager der Achaier vor Troia: Orakel und magische Rituale im hethiterzeitlichen Kleinasien und im ar- chaischen Griechenland. Klio 90.7–26. Kaltsas, Nikolaos and H. Alan Shapiro (eds.). 2008. Worshipping Women: Ritual and Reality in Classical Athens. Athens and New York: Alexander S. Onassis Benefit Foundation. Kassian, Alexei, Andrej Korolëv, and Andrej Sidel'tsev (eds.). 2004. Hittite Funerary Ritual: Sallis Wastais. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag. Katz, Joshua. 1998. How to Be a Dragon in Indo-European: Hittite illuyankaš and its Linguistic and Cultural Congeners in , Greek and Germanic. In Jay Jasanoff, H. Craig Melchert, and Lisi Oliver (eds.), Mír Curad: Studies in Honor of Calvert Wat- kins, 317–35. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft. Kimball, Stephanie. 2010. Tawananna. In René Lebrun and Julien de Vos (eds.), Studia Anatolica in Memoriam Erich Neu Dicata, 79–86. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters. Kirk, Geoffrey. 1990. The “Iliad”: A Commentary II: Books 5–8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon. Lei- den and Boston: Brill. Koehl, Robert. 1995. The Silver Stag BIBRU from Mycenae. In Jane Carter and Sarah P. Morris (eds.), The Ages of Homer: A Tribute to Emily Townsend Vermeule, 61–6. Austin: University of Texas Press. López-Ruiz, Carolina. 2010. When the Gods Were Born: Greek Cosmogonies and the Near East. Cambridge, : Press. Lorimer, H. L. 1950. Homer and the Monuments. London: MacMillan. Melchert, Craig. 2004. A Dictionary of the Lycian Language. Ann Arbor and New York: Beech Stave. Morris, Sarah. 1989. A Tale of Two Cities: The Miniature Frescoes from and the Origins of Greek Poetry. American Journal of Archaeology 93/3.511–35. ———. 2001. Potnia Aswiya: Anatolian Contributions to Greek Religion. In Robert Laffineur and Robin Hägg (eds.), Potnia: Deities and Religion in the Aegean Bronze Age, 423–34. Liège: Université de Liège. ———. 2003. Frogs Around the Pond? Cultural Diversity in the Ancient World and the New Millennium. Syllecta Classica 13.1–21. Oettinger, Norbert. 2011. Invasion und Assimilation von Griechen in Kilikien: Konse- quenzen aus den Berichten über Mopsos/Muksas. In Hartmut Matthäus, Norbert Oettinger, and S. Schröder (eds.), Der Orient und die Anfänge Europas. Kulturelle Beziehungen von der späten Bronzezeit bis zur frühen Eisenzeit, 127–33. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Otten, Heinrich. 1952. Beiträge zum hethitischen Wortschatz. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 50.230–6. 166 Sarah Morris

———. 1975. Puduḫepa: Eine hethitische Königin in ihren Textzeugnissen. Mainz and Wiesbaden: Steiner. Parker, Robert. 1998. Cleomenes on the Acropolis. An Inaugural Lecture delivered before the University of Oxford on 12 May 1997. Oxford: Clarendon Press. de Roos, Johan. 2006. Materials for a Biography: The Correspondence of Puduḫepa with Egypt and Ugarit. In Theo van den Hout and Cees H. van Zoest (eds.), The Life and Times of Ḫattusili III and Tutḫaliya IV, 17–26. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten. ———. 2007. Hittite Votive Texts. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten. Puhvel, Jaan. 1991. Hittite Etymological Dictionary III: Words Beginning with H. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Rutherford, Ian. 2006. Religion at the Greco-Anatolian Interface: The Case of Karia. In Manfred Hutter and Sylvia Hutter-Braunsar (eds.), Pluralismus und Wandel in den Religionen im vorhellenistischen Anatolien, 137–44. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag. ———. 2007. and the Sallis Wastais Ritual: Performing Death in Greece and Anatolia. In Nicola Laneri (ed.), Performing Death: Social Analyses of Funerary Traditions in the and Mediterranean, 223–36. Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. Schmitz, Philip. 2009. Archaic Greek Names in a Neo-Assyrian Cuneiform Tablet from Tarsus. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 61.127–31. Sourvinou-Inwood, Christiane. 1988. Theano Menonos Agrylethen. Greece and Rome 35.29–39. Stubbings, Frank. 1962. Arms and Armour. In Alan J. B. Wace and Frank H. Stubbings (eds.), A Companion to Homer, 504–22. London: MacMillan. Taggar-Cohen, Ada. 2006. Hittite Priesthood. Heidelberg: Winter. Taracha, Piotr. 2003. Is Tuthaliya’s Sword Really Aegean? In Beckman, Beal, and Mc- Mahon 2003, 367–76. Uchitel, Alexander. 2007. The Earliest Tyrants: From Luwian tarwanis to Greek τύραννος. In Gabriel Herman and Israel Shatzman (eds.), Greeks Between East and West: Essays in Greek Literature and History in Memory of David Asheri, 13–30. Je- rusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. Watkins, Calvert. 1986. The Language of the Trojans. In Machteld Mellink (ed.), Troy and the Trojan War: A Symposium Held at Bryn Mawr College, October 1984, 45– 62. Bryn Mawr, PA: Bryn Mawr College. ———. 1995. How to Kill a Dragon: Aspects of Indo-European Poetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ———. 2007. Hipponactea Quaedam. In Peter Finglass, Christopher Collard, and Nicho- las J. Richardson (eds.), Hesperos: Studies in Poetry Presented to M. L. West on His Seventieth Birthday, 118–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press. From Kizzuwatna to Troy? 167

———. 2008. Hermit Crabs, or New Wine in Old Bottles: Anatolian and Hellenic Con- nections from Homer and Before to Antiochus I of Commagene and After. In Col- lins, Bachvarova, and Rutherford 2008, 135–41.