Achieving Sustainability in Urban Transport in Developing and Transition Countries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Achieving Sustainability in Urban Transport in Developing and Transition Countries | TEXTE | 02/2012 Achieving sustainability in urban transport in developing and transition countries | TEXTE | 02 /20 12 ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, NATURE CONSERVATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY Project No. (FKZ) 3710 96 148 Report No. ( UBA -FB ) 00 1546/E Achieving sustainability in urban transport in developing and transition countries by Prof. Dr. Michael Bräuninger, Dr. Sven Schulze, Leon Leschus Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI), Hamburg Dr. Jürgen Perschon, Christof Hertel, Simon Field, Nicole Foletta European Institute for Sustainable Transport (EURIST), Hamburg On behalf of the Federal Environment Agency (Germany) UMWELTBUNDESAMT This publication is only available online. It can be downloaded from http://www.uba.de/uba-info-medien-e/4239.html along with a German-language summary. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the official opinions. ISSN 1862-4804 Study performed by: Hamburgisches WeltWirtschaftsInstitut European Institute for gemeinnützige GmbH Sustainable Transport Hamburg Institute of Weidenbaumsweg 13 International Economics 21029 Hamburg Heimhuder Straße 71 20148 Hamburg Study completed in: August 2011 Publisher: Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt) Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Germany Phone: +49-340-2103-0 Fax: +49-340-2103 2285 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de http://fuer-mensch-und-umwelt.de/ Edited by: Section I 3.1 Environment and Transport Dr. Hedwig Verron Dessau-Roßlau, January 2012 Report Cover Sheet 1. Report No. 2. - 3. - UBA-FB 001546/E 4. Report Title Achieving sustainability in urban transport in developing and transition countries 5. Autor(s), Family Name(s), First Name(s) 8. Report Date Prof. Dr. Michael Bräuninger, Dr. Sven Schulze, Leon Leschus August 2011 Dr. Jürgen Perschon, Christof Hertel, Simon Field, Nicole Foletta 9. Publication Date 6. Performing Organisation (Name, Address) January 2012 Hamburg Institute of International Economics gGmbH (HWWI) 10. UFOPLAN-Ref. No. Heimhuder Straße 71 371096148 20148 Hamburg 11. No. of Pages 148 7. Sponsoring Agency (Name, Address) 12. No. of Reference Umweltbundesamt, Postfach 14 06, 06813 Dessau-Roßlau 208 13. No. of Tables, Diagrams 4 14. No. of Figures 21 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Sustainable transport is an urging issue on a few accounts: The transport sector was responsible for 23% global CO2 emission in 2007. It also has a number of other effects like air and noise pollution, land use etc. These effects are especially relevant in cities, where already half of the world’s population is living today. With a growing world population and ongoing urbanisation the number and share of city dwellers will rise considerably in the next decades. Thus, sustainability in urban transport becomes increasingly important. This report first provides a short overview of the most important data behind the sustainability problems in urban transport. Then the question is addressed, what sustainable mobility is and where the main obstacles are on the path to more sustainability. The central part of the study deals with the most important policies and instruments enhancing sustainable (urban) mobility. The main feature of each section within that part of the study is the combination of theoretical background information and arguments with case studies from developing and transition countries. Accordingly, the reader gets an idea of the vast range of available instruments in order to promote sustainable mobility. But it is also shown that it is not only necessary but also possible to introduce or enhance sustainable urban transport regardless of the income position of the specific region, country or city. Besides, success factors for different instruments are identified, thereby deriving promising routes for countries or a group of countries according to their state of economic development. 17. Keywords Transport, mobility, cities, developing countries, transition countries 18. Price 19. 20. III Berichts-Kennblatt 1. Berichtsnummer 2. - 3. - UBA-FB 001546/E 4. Titel des Berichts Wege zu nachhaltigem urbanen Transport in Entwicklungs- und Schwellenländern 5. Autor(en), Name(n), Vorname(n) 8. Abschlussdatum Prof. Dr. Michael Bräuninger, Dr. Sven Schulze, Leon Leschus August 2011 Dr. Jürgen Perschon, Christof Hertel, Simon Field, Nicole Foletta 9. Veröffentlichungsdatum 6. Durchführende Institution (Name, Anschrift) Januar 2012 Hamburgisches WeltWirtschaftsInstitut gGmbH (HWWI) 10. UFOPLAN-Nr. Heimhuder Straße 71 371096148 20148 Hamburg 11. Seitenzahl 148 7. Fördernde Institution (Name, Anschrift) 12. Literaturangaben Umweltbundesamt, Postfach 14 06, 06813 Dessau-Roßlau 208 13. Tabellen und Diagramme 4 14. Abbildungen 21 15. Zusätzliche Angaben 16. Kurzfassung Nachhaltigkeit in der Mobilität ist aus verschiedenen Gründen ein drängendes Problem: Der Transportsektor war in 2007 für 23% der weltweiten CO2-Emissionen verantwortlich. Er hat zudem eine Reihe weiterer Effekte wie Luftverschmutzung, Lärmemissionen, Landverbrauch usw. Diese Phänomene sind besonders in Städten von Bedeutung, wo bereits heutzutage die Hälfte der Weltbevölkerung lebt. Mit einer weiter wachsenden Weltbevölkerung und fort- schreitender Urbanisierung wird die Zahl und der Anteil der Stadtbewohner in den kommenden Jahrzehnten deutlich zunehmen. Deshalb kommt der Nachhaltigkeit im städtischen Verkehr eine zunehmend wichtige Rolle zu. Der vorliegende Report gibt zunächst einen kurzen Überblick zu den wichtigsten Daten des Nachhaltigkeitsproblems im urbanen Transport. Danach wird die Frage diskutiert, was unter nachhaltiger Mobilität zu verstehen ist und welches die wesentlichen Hindernisse bei ihrer Erreichung sind. Der Hauptteil des Berichts widmet sich den wichtigsten Politikbereichen und Instrumenten zur Förderung nachhaltiger (urbaner) Mobilität. Die einzelnen Abschnitte zeichnen sich dadurch aus, dass theoretische Hintergrundinformationen und Argumente mit Fallstudien aus Entwicklungs- und Schwellenländern kombiniert werden. Einerseits erhält der Leser damit Einblick in die große Zahl an Instrumenten, um nachhaltige Mobilität zu fördern. Andererseits wird damit verdeutlicht, dass nachhaltige urbane Mobilität unabhängig von der Einkommens- position bzw. vom Wohlstand einer Region, eines Landes oder einer Stadt möglich ist. Die Studie zeigt Erfolgsfaktoren für verschiedene Instrumente auf, auf deren Grundlage erfolgver- sprechende Strategien für Länder oder Ländergruppen in Abhängigkeit von ihrem ökonomischen Entwicklungsstand abgeleitet werden können. 17. Schlagwörter 18. Preis 19. 20. IV Contents List of figures .............................................................................................................................. 3 List of tables ............................................................................................................................... 4 List of abbreviations and acronyms ........................................................................................... 5 Executive summary .................................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 13 2. Data and challenges: An international perspective ........................................................ 14 3. The characteristics of sustainable mobility ..................................................................... 22 4. Policies to promote sustainable mobility ........................................................................ 28 1. Basic considerations .................................................................................................. 28 2. Financing of infrastructure ........................................................................................ 35 1. Background ....................................................................................................... 35 2. Best-Practice Examples .................................................................................... 45 Case Study 1: National Financing Instruments: Second Generation Road Funds - The Case of Tanzania ...................................................................................... 45 Case Study 2: Local Financing Instruments in Sibiu, Romania ......................... 48 Case Study 3: Public Private Partnership (PPP) in Transport – Hong Kong ...... 50 Case Study 4: Global Environment Facility (GEF): The Latin America Regional Sustainable Transport and Air Quality Project ................................................. 53 Case Study 5: Climate Investment Fund (CIF) & Clean Technology Fund (CTF) for comprehensive urban transport systems: Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam ............................................................................................................. 55 Case Study 6: Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMA) Morocco .. 58 3. Settlement structures ............................................................................................... 61 1. Background ....................................................................................................... 61 2. Best-Practice Examples .................................................................................... 66 Case Study 7: Coordination of Transportation and Land Use Planning in Curitiba, Brazil ..................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Green Deal – the Coordinators
    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • Land Transport Safety
    - PART II - Outline of the Plan CHAPTER 1 Land Transport Safety Section 1 Road Transport Safety 1 Improvement of Road Traffic Environment To address the changes in the social situation such as the problem of a low birthrate and an aging population, there is a need to reform the traffic community to prevent accidents of children and ensure that the senior citizens can go out safely without fear. In view of this, people-first roadway improvements are being undertaken by ensuring walking spaces offering safety and security by building sidewalks on roads such as the school routes, residential roads and urban arterial roads etc. In addition to the above mentioned measures, the road traffic environment improvement project is systematically carried out to maintain a safe road traffic network by separating it into arterial high-standard highways and regional roads to control the inflow of the traffic into the residential roads. Also, on the roads where traffic safety has to be secured, traffic safety facilities such as sidewalks are being provided. Thus, by effective traffic control promotion and detailed accident prevention measures, a safe traffic environment with a speed limit on the vehicles and separation of different traffic types such as cars, bikes and pedestrians is to be created. 1 Improvement of people-first walking spaces offering safety and security (promoting building of sidewalks in the school routes) 2 Improvement of road networks and promoting the use of roads with high specifications 3 Implementation of intensive traffic safety measures in sections with a high rate of accidents 4 Effective traffic control promotion 5 Improving the road traffic environment in unison with the local residents 6 Promotion of accident prevention measures on National Expressways etc.
    [Show full text]
  • EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende Und Deren Stellvertreter*Innen Auf Den Konstituierenden Sitzungen Am Mittwoch, 10
    EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende und deren Stellvertreter*innen Auf den konstituierenden Sitzungen am Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2019, haben die siebenundzwanzig permanenten Ausschüsse des EU-Parlaments ihre Vorsitzenden und Stellvertreter*innen gewählt. Nachfolgend die Ergebnisse (Reihenfolge analog zur Auflistung auf den Seiten des Europäischen Parlaments): Ausschuss Vorsitzender Stellvertreter Witold Jan WASZCZYKOEDKI (ECR, PL) AFET Urmas PAET (Renew, EE) David McALLISTER (EPP, DE) Auswärtige Angelegenheiten Sergei STANISHEV (S&D, BG) Željana ZOVKO (EPP, HR) Bernard GUETTA (Renew, FR) DROI Hannah NEUMANN (Greens/EFA, DE) Marie ARENA (S&D, BE) Menschenrechte Christian SAGARTZ (EPP, AT) Raphael GLUCKSMANN (S&D, FR) Nikos ANDROULAKIS (S&D, EL) SEDE Kinga GÁL (EPP, HU) Nathalie LOISEAU (RE, FR) Sicherheit und Verteidigung Özlem DEMIREL (GUE/NGL, DE) Lukas MANDL (EPP, AT) Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA (Greens/EFA, DE) DEVE Norbert NEUSER (S&D, DE) Tomas TOBÉ (EPP, SE) Entwicklung Chrysoula ZACHAROPOULOU (RE, FR) Erik MARQUARDT (Greens/EFA, DE) Seite 1 14.01.2021 Jan ZAHRADIL (ECR, CZ) INTA Iuliu WINKLER (EPP, RO) Bernd LANGE (S&D, DE) Internationaler Handel Anna-Michelle ASIMAKOPOULOU (EPP, EL) Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE (RE, FR) Janusz LEWANDOWSKI (EPP, PL) BUDG Oliver CHASTEL (RE, BE) Johan VAN OVERTVELDT (ECR, BE) Haushalt Margarida MARQUES (S&D, PT) Niclas HERBST (EPP, DE) Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ (S&D, ES) CONT Caterina CHINNICI (S&D, IT) Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) Haushaltskontrolle Martina DLABAJOVÁ (RE, CZ) Tamás DEUTSCH (EPP, HU) Luděk NIEDERMAYER
    [Show full text]
  • Planning of Cargo Bike Hubs
    PLANNING OF CARGO BIKE HUBS A guide for municipalities and industry for the planning of transshipment hubs for new urban logistics concepts The project "Cargo Bike Hub" is funded by the Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure via the implementation of the National Cycling Plan 2020. Authors: Tom Assmann M. Sc. (ILM) Florian Müller M. Sc. (IPSY) Sebastian Bobeth M. Sc. (IPSY) Leonard Baum B. Sc. (ILM) Chair of Logistics Systems, Institute of Logistics and Material Handling Systems (ILM) Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Prof. E. h. Dr. h. c. mult. Michael Schenk Chair of Environmental Psychology, Institute of Psychology (IPSY) Prof. Dr. Ellen Matthies Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg October 2019 Layout and Design: FORMFLUTDESIGN – www.formflut.com English Version 2020 - Translation, Layout and Design CityChangerCargoBike Project The Project „Cargo Bike Depot“ was accompanied by the project advisory board with representatives from: Cargobike.jetzt; Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR); DPD Deutschland GmbH; Neomesh GmbH (CLAC-Aachen); PedalPower Schönstedt&Busack GbR; Stadt Köln – Amt für Straßen und Verkehrstechnik; United Parcel Service (UPS); Zentrum für angewandte Psychologie, Umwelt- und Sozialforschung (ZEUS GmbH). CONTENT 1. Objective 7 5. Components of planning 18 5.1 Implementation planning 18 5.2 Area 19 2. Basics of Urban Cycle logistics 7 5.3 Usage 20 2.1 Definition Cargo Bike 7 5.3.1 Cooperative vs. concessionary use 20 2.2 What types of cargo bikes are available 7 5.3.2 Combined uses vs. mixed
    [Show full text]
  • Putting Clean Tech on a Path to Subsidy Independence
    APRIL 2012 BE YOND BOOM & BUST PUTTING CLEAN TECH ON A PATH TO SUBSIDY INDEPENDENCE Jesse Jenkins, Director of Energy and Climate Policy, Breakthrough Institute Mark Muro, Senior Fellow, Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings Institution Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger, Cofounders, Breakthrough Institute Letha Tawney, Senior Associate, World Resources Institute Alex Trembath, Policy Associate, Breakthrough Institute APRIL 2012 BE YOND BOOM & BUST PUTTING CLEAN TECH ON A PATH TO SUBSIDY INDEPENDENCE Jesse Jenkins, Director of Energy and Climate Policy, Breakthrough Institute Mark Muro, Senior Fellow, Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings Institution Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger, Cofounders, Breakthrough Institute Letha Tawney, Senior Associate, World Resources Institute Alex Trembath, Policy Associate, Breakthrough Institute INSTITUTIONAL AFFILIATIONS LISTED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY APRIL 2012 CONTENTS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY g CONTENTS f 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Key Recommendations for a New Era of Clean Energy Policy 8g Key Recommendations for a New Era of Clean Energy Policy 8 PART 1: FROM CLEAN TECH BOOM TO FEDERAL SPENDING BUST 1g2 PART 1: FROM CLEAN TECH BOOM TO FEDERAL SPENDING BUST Methodology 1g5 12 Methodology 15 Analysis of Federal Clean Tech Spending, 2009 to 2014 1g6 Analysis of Federal Clean Tech Spending, 2009 to 2014 16 The Federal Clean Tech Funding Cliff 1g9 The Federal Clean Tech Funding Cliff 19 What’s Left After 2014? 2g2 What’s Left After 2014? 22 PART 2: CLEAN TECH MARKET IMPACTS 2g3 PART 2: Wind
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of the Ozone Air Quality Problem in the Ozone Transport Region: a Conceptual Description
    The Nature of the Ozone Air Quality Problem in the Ozone Transport Region: A Conceptual Description Prepared for the Ozone Transport Commission Prepared by NESCAUM Boston, MA October 2006 Revised August 2010 Contributing Authors Tom Downs, Maine Department of Environmental Protection Richard Fields, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Prof. Robert Hudson, University of Maryland Iyad Kheirbek, NESCAUM (now with the NYC Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene) Gary Kleiman, NESCAUM Paul Miller, NESCAUM Leah Weiss, NESCAUM Acknowledgements NESCAUM thanks the Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association for providing the foundational basis of the 2006 report. NESCAUM also thanks the following people for their comments and input during the development of the 2006 and revised 2010 reports: Tad Aburn, Maryland Department of the Environment Debra Baker, Maryland Department of the Environment Michael Geigert, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Kurt Kebschull, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Tonalee Key, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Mohammed A. Majeed, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation Ali Mirzakhalili, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation Charles Pietarinen, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Robert Sliwinski, New York Department of Environmental Conservation Jeff Underhill, New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services David Wackter, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
    [Show full text]
  • Siena Footbridge
    Structural Stainless Steel Case Study 05 Siena Footbridge Completed in 2006, this stainless steel cable stayed footbridge spans 60 m over a busy motorway in the suburb of Ruffolo, Siena, in central Italy. The bridge girders and pylons are fabricated from a ‘lean’ duplex grade of stainless steel and it is one of the first times this grade has been used for a footbridge. The bridge has a striking appearance, is functionally efficient and cost-effective with a low life cycle cost. Material Selection The City of Siena required an attractive pedestrian crossing to be constructed over the motorway in the suburb of Ruffolo. The structure needed to have a 120 year design life without expensive and disruptive maintenance requirements. The architect selected the ‘lean’ stainless steel duplex grade 1.4162 (S32101) for the girders and pylons of the bridge. Lean duplexes have a very low nickel content (1.5 % compared to >3 % in standard duplex stainless steels), which results in significant cost benefits compared to other austenitic and duplex grades. This grade of stainless steel also experiences less price volatility because of the low nickel content. The corrosion resistance of 1.4162, which lies between that of austenitic grades 1.4301 (S30400) and 1.4404 (S31603), is adequate for Ruffolo’s benign inland environment with relatively low pollution levels. Grade 1.4162 has high strength (450 N/mm2), good ductility (at least 30 %) and good formability and weldability. The high strength enables reductions in section sizes, relative to carbon steel sections, leading to lighter structures. This grade has tremendous potential for future structural applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrification of Public Transport in Cities (Horizon 2020 ELIPTIC Project)
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Transportation Research Procedia 14 ( 2016 ) 2614 – 2619 6th Transport Research Arena April 18-21, 2016 Electrification of public transport in cities (Horizon 2020 ELIPTIC Project) Michael Glotz-Richter a,*, Hendrik Koch a aCity of Bremen, ELIPTIC project coordination, Contrescarpe 72, 28195 Bremen Abstract Public transport is one of the backbones of sustainable transport strategies in Europe. Collective transport has undisputed benefits concerning space efficiency. Today, more than 90% of buses in Europe depend on diesel, calling for better environmental and post- fossil alternatives. Further electrification of public transport (in combination with green electricity production) is a core aspect of further improving the environmental profile of public transport. Investments in electrifying public transport have a particularly high impact since urban public transport vehicles run up to 16 hours per day, compared to less than one hour for the average conventional car. A single 18 m urban bus consumes about 40,000 litres diesel annually – equivalent to more than 100 tons of CO2! THE EU ELIPTIC project is looking at the electrification of urban buses as well as the improvement of energy performance in light rail and the multi-purpose use of infrastructure to support further electrification in transport. ELIPTIC is demonstrating technical approaches in 20 showcases with variations of electrified public transport under different operational, geographical and climate conditions. The demonstrations include new battery buses of high passenger capacity (18 m articulated) as they are increasingly in demand by public transport operators. Another concept is the combination of battery and trolley bus concepts, allowing to recharge batteries in operation (when connected to the overhead wires) and giving trolley bus cities an opportunity to extend the electric operation into areas without overhead wires.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Transport Systems: Linkages Between Environmental Issues, Public Transport, Non-Motorised Transport and Safety1
    Sustainable Transport Systems: Linkages Between Environmental Issues, Public Transport, Non-Motorised Transport and Safety1 Dinesh Mohan and Geetam Tiwari Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Programme Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India INTRODUCTION A sustainable transport system must provide mobility and accessibility to all urban residents in a safe and environment friendly mode of transport. This is a complex and difficult task when the needs and demands of people belonging to different income groups are not only different but also often conflicting. For example, if a large proportion of the population can not afford to use motorised transport - private vehicles or public buses - then they have to either walk or ride bicycles to work. Provision of safe infrastructure for bicyclists and pedestrians may need segregation of road space for bicyclists and pedestrians from motorised traffic or reduction in speeds of vehicles. Both measures could result in restricting mobility of car users. Similarly, measures to reduce pollution may at times conflict with those needed for reduction in road accidents. For example, increases in average vehicle speeds may reduce emissions but they can result in an increase in accident rates. But, most public discussions and government policy documents dealing with transportation and health focus only on air pollution as the main concern. This is because air pollution is generally visible and its deleterious effects are palpable. It is easy for most people to connect the associations between quality of motor vehicles, exhaust fumes and increased morbidity due to pollution. But most individuals are not able to understand the complex interaction of factors associated with road accidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof Hanif Kara
    •• Professor in Practice of Architectural Technology at Harvard GSD •• Member of Harvard GSD Faculty Board for Executive Education Division •• Visiting Professor of Architectural Technology at KTH Stockholm (2008 – 2012) •• First structural engineer to be appointed as CABE Commissioner (2008 – 2012) •• One of fifteen members of the ‘Design for London’ Advisory Group to the Mayor of London (2007 – 2008) •• Member of the Architecture Foundation’s Board of Trustees •• Member of 2011 RIBA Stirling Awards Jury •• External examiner for the Architectural Association •• Awarded the ACE Engineering Ambassador of the Year 2011 •• Member of Design Council CABE, London Design Panel 2012 •• Member of Aga Khan Award for Architecture Master Jury 2004 and Steering Committee 2015 •• Member of the New London Sounding Board •• Review Panel - Swiss National Science Foundation, NCCR Digital Fabrication Prof Hanif Kara BSc (Hons) CEng FIStructE FICE FREng Hon FRIBA FRSA Co-founder and director of AKT II Hanif Kara is a principal and co-founder of London-based structural engineering practice AKT II, as well as an educator. Under his leadership the practice has, in the last decade, gained an international standing in the field of the built environment. Since forming AKT II (originally as His contribution to the industry has board of trustees for the Architecture Adams Kara Taylor) in 1996, he has been been recognised by professional bodies, Foundation. responsible for a number of innovative where he is a fellow member of the Royal In the global context, the Aga Khan and pioneering projects but also for Academy of Engineering, the Institute Award for Architecture is recognised as raising the profile of ‘design’, both in of Civil Engineers and the Institute of one of the most important awards in the the construction industry and the wider Structural Engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • MANUFACTURING AGENDA a National Blueprint for Clean Technology Manufacturing Leadership and Industrial Transformation CONTENTS
    MANUFACTURING AGENDA A National Blueprint for Clean Technology Manufacturing Leadership and Industrial Transformation CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Overarching Objectives 4 MANUFACTURING AGENDA 6 PILLAR 1: Invest at Scale in a New Generation of American Manufacturing 6 PILLAR 2: Innovate to Transform Industry 11 PILLAR 3: Responsibly Mine, Reclaim, and Recycle Critical Materials 14 PILLAR 4: Use Public Investment Wisely to Build a Strong, Clean, Fair Manufacturing Economy Across America 16 PILLAR 5: Change the Rules to Build a Clean Economy that Works for All 20 Glossary of Key Concepts and Terms 23 Endnotes iii Cover photo by: Sam VarnHagen, courtesy of Ford Motor Company EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The U.S. can once again lead the world in manufacturing the technologies and products of the future. As an integral part of an aggressive strategy to address the climate emergency head on—and in line with achieving net zero emissions economy-wide by 2050—we have the opportunity to modernize and transform our industrial base to make it the cleanest and most advanced in the world, while spurring the creation of a new generation of good, safe jobs manufacturing clean technology. This industrial transformation can bring dynamic industries back to communities that have been left behind by deindustrialization and under-investment, and provide a starting point for broadly shared growth and prosperity. Last year, the BlueGreen Alliance—alongside our labor central role in the balance of U.S. imports and exports— and environmental partners—released Solidarity for and the jobs that go with them. Manufacturing also Climate Action, an ambitious, concrete platform to has the proven ability to provide pathways into the address the crises of climate change and economic and middle class for millions of workers and families, and to racial inequality simultaneously.1 support millions of high-skill, high-wage jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrian Footbridge, (Applicant Identification: ) Environmental Assessment
    PEDESTRIAN FOOTBRIDGE, (APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION: ) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT New York State Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery May 8, 2015 PEDESTRIAN FOOTBRIDGE – ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & ERR PROJECT SUMMARY Responsible Entity: New York State Homes & Community Renewal – Housing Trust Fund Corporation cooperating with the Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery (GOSR) Certifying Officer: Daniel Greene, Esq., Certifying Environmental Officer, GOSR Project Name: Pedestrian Footbridge, Funding Recipient: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) Project #: Project Sponsor: New York State Housing Trust Fund Corporation Program Name: New York State Community Development Block Grant – Disaster Recovery (Housing Assistance Programs, 1 - 4 Unit) Project Address: , Sundown, NY 12740 Project County: Ulster County, NY Estimated Project Cost: $140,000 Project Sponsor Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery Address: 99 Washington Avenue, Suite 1224 Albany, New York 12231 Primary Contact/ Person Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery To Direct Comments: 25 Beaver Street, 5th Floor New York, New York 10004 E-Mail address: [email protected] Telephone Number: (212) 480-4644 Project NEPA 24 CFR 58.36 Classification: Finding of No Significant Impact - The project will not result ENVIRONMENTAL in a significant impact on the quality of the human FINDING: environment. Finding of Significant Impact - The project may significantly affect the quality of the human environment. The undersigned hereby certifies that New York State Housing Trust Fund Corporation has conducted an environmental review of the project identified above and prepared the attached environmental review record in compliance with all applicable provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, (42 USC sec.
    [Show full text]