DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure Cover Photo: Rajendra Ravi, Institute for Democracy & Sustainability. Acknowledgements This Planning and Design guideline has been produced as part of the Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation (SSEF) sponsored project on Non-motorised Transport by the Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Programme at the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi. The project team at TRIPP, IIT Delhi, has worked closely with researchers from Innovative Transport Solutions (iTrans) Pvt. Ltd. and SGArchitects during the course of this project. We are thankful to all our project partners for detailed discussions on planning and design issues involving non-motorised transport: The Manual for Cycling Inclusive Urban Infrastructure Design in the Indian Subcontinent’ (2009) supported by Interface for Cycling Embassy under Bicycle Partnership Program which was funded by Sustainable Urban Mobility in Asia. The second document is Public Transport Accessibility Toolkit (2012) and the third one is the Urban Road Safety Audit (URSA) Toolkit supported by Institute of Urban Transport (IUT) provided the necessary background information for this document. We are thankful to Prof. Madhav Badami, Tom Godefrooij, Prof. Talat Munshi, Rajinder Ravi, Pradeep Sachdeva, Prasanna Desai, Ranjit Gadgil, Parth Shah and Dr. Girish Agrawal for reviewing an earlier version of this document and providing valuable comments. We thank all our colleagues at the Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Programme for cooperation provided during the course of this study. Finally we would like to thank the transport team at Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation (SSEF) for providing the necessary support required for the completion of this document. Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure Project Team Transportation Research & Injury Prevention Programme (TRIPP), IIT Delhi Prof. Geetam Tiwari Project Incharge Ruchi Varma Project Associate Parvesh Sherawat Project Associate Anusha Vaid Project Associate Innovative Transport Solutions (iTrans) PVT. LTD Dr. Anvita Arora MD & CEO Ravi Gadepalli Manager (Transportation) SGArchitects, New Delhi Sandeep Gandhi Principal Architect Satyajit Ganguly Architect / Transport Planner Project Support Mahesh Gaur Office Administrator Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure Table of Contents 1 Introduction to Non Motorised Transport ................................................................................................7 1.1 Why a Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure? ..............................................7 1.2 Current Users and Trends .........................................................................................................7 1.3 Trip Length Frequency in Cities .................................................................................................8 1.4 Potential Vs. Captive Cyclists ....................................................................................................8 1.5 Different Kinds of Cyclists .........................................................................................................10 1.6 Cycling and Health .................................................................................................................... 10 1.7 Cycling and Safety ..................................................................................................................... 10 1.8 Cycle and the Environment .......................................................................................................12 1.9 Current Indian Policy & Guidelines ...........................................................................................12 1.10 Examples from Indian Cities .....................................................................................................14 1.11 Myths ........................................................................................................................................ 15 2 Planning for Non-Motorised Transport ....................................................................................................16 2.1 Planning Requirements .............................................................................................................16 2.2 Planning Development Process ................................................................................................22 2.3 Data Collection and Review of Existing Scenario ......................................................................22 2.3.1 Road Network Inventory ...........................................................................................................22 2.3.2 Travel Behavior Pattern of User Groups ....................................................................................22 2.4 Needs Assessment Through Travel Demand Modelling ...........................................................24 2.4.1 Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) Map Creation..................................................................................24 2.4.2 Trip Generation ......................................................................................................................... 26 2.4.3 Current and Potential Cycle Users and Trip Distribution ..........................................................28 2.4.4 Trip Distribution ........................................................................................................................ 28 2.4.5 Traffic Assignment and Calibration ...........................................................................................30 2.5 Horizon Year Scenarios Analysis ...............................................................................................30 2.6 The Non-Motorized Transport Master Plan (NMT-MP) and Network Plan ...............................32 2.6.1 Phasing for NMTMP Implementation .......................................................................................32 2.7 Network Planning in Existing Built-up Areas and New Cities ....................................................34 3 Design for Non-Motorised Transport .......................................................................................................36 3.1 Basic Information ...................................................................................................................... 36 3.2 Design Requirements ................................................................................................................38 3.3 Data Collection ......................................................................................................................... 40 3.4 Infrastructure Design ................................................................................................................40 3.4.1 Cross Section Design .................................................................................................................40 3.4.2 Intersection and Approach design ............................................................................................44 1 Planning and Design Guideline for Cycle Infrastructure 3.4.3 Special Conditions .................................................................................................................... 46 3.5 Other Design Details .................................................................................................................50 3.5.1 Riding Material Selection ..........................................................................................................50 3.5.2 Integrating Traffic Calming Measures .......................................................................................50 3.5.3 Edge Treatments ....................................................................................................................... 52 3.5.4 Road Furniture and Support Facilities ......................................................................................54 3.5.5 Signage ..................................................................................................................................... 56 3.5.6 Markings ................................................................................................................................... 56 3.5.7 Services and Utilities .................................................................................................................56 3.6 Parking Facilities ....................................................................................................................... 60 3.7 Annexure .................................................................................................................................. 64 3.7.1 Comparison between bicycle and cycle rickshaw .....................................................................64 3.7.2 Total Station Survey – Checklist ................................................................................................64 3.7.3 Activity Survey – Checklist ........................................................................................................65 3.7.4 Traffic Volume and Pedestrian Survey ....................................................................................65 3.7.5 Parking Survey .......................................................................................................................... 67 3.7.6 Provision of Free Segregated Left turns ....................................................................................67
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Definition of Footpath and Road Margin
    Meanings of “footpath” and “road margin” in Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004 The RURs provide the following definitions 1.6 Interpretation: footpath means a path or way principally designed for, and used by, pedestrians; and ​ includes a footbridge road margin includes any uncultivated margin of a road adjacent to but not forming part of ​ ​ ​ either the roadway or the footpath (if any) The definition of “footpath” encompasses the road space that is principally designed for and used by pedestrians. There is nothing in any of the rules that reference footpath that limits this to paved areas of the pedestrian space. The definition of “road margin” excludes any part of the footpath. The term is only used in RUR 6.2, 11.14 and 11.15. Both 11.14 and 11.15 refer to riders of horses. 11.14 requires horse riders to “when a reasonably adequate road margin is available, keep the animal on ​ the road margin as far as practicable”, but prohibits riding “along a footpath, or on any lawn, ​ ​ garden, or other cultivation adjacent to or forming part of a road”. These words suggest that ​ road margins do not exist on all roads. It appears that the term “road margin” only refers to ​ ​ areas set aside and formed for parking or stopping off the roadway References to “footpath” and “road margin” in other legislation Both terms appear with the same definitions in related legislation: the Land Transport (Offences and Penalties) Regulations 1999 (in a schedule of penalties for breaching rules in the RUR, and the Traffic Regulations 1976 (largely revoked and Replaced by the RUR).
    [Show full text]
  • Roundabout Planning, Design, and Operations Manual
    Roundabout Planning, Design, and Operations Manual December 2015 Alabama Department of Transportation ROUNDABOUT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND OPERATIONS MANUAL December 2015 Prepared by: The University Transportation Center for of Alabama Steven L. Jones, Ph.D. Abdulai Abdul Majeed Steering Committee Tim Barnett, P.E., ALDOT Office of Safety Operations Stuart Manson, P.E., ALDOT Office of Safety Operations Sonya Baker, ALDOT Office of Safety Operations Stacey Glass, P.E., ALDOT Maintenance Stan Biddick, ALDOT Design Bryan Fair, ALDOT Planning Steve Walker, P.E., ALDOT R.O.W. Vince Calametti, P.E., ALDOT 9th Division James Brown, P.E., ALDOT 2nd Division James Foster, P.E., Mobile County Clint Andrews, Federal Highway Administration Blair Perry, P.E., Gresham Smith & Partners Howard McCulloch, P.E., NE Roundabouts DISCLAIMER This manual provides guidelines and recommended practices for planning and designing roundabouts in the State of Alabama. This manual cannot address or anticipate all possible field conditions that will affect a roundabout design. It remains the ultimate responsibility of the design engineer to ensure that a design is appropriate for prevailing traffic and field conditions. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1.1. Purpose ...................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2. Scope and Organization ............................................................................... 1-7 1.3. Limitations ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous Flow Intersection, Parallel Flow Intersection, and Upstream Signalized Crossover
    Comparison of Three Unconventional Arterial Intersection Designs: Continuous Flow Intersection, Parallel Flow Intersection, and Upstream Signalized Crossover Seonyeong Cheong, Saed Rahwanji, and Gang-Len Chang Abstract— This research is aimed to evaluate and world have adopted many conventional measures, including compare the operational performance of three signal planning and double left-turn lanes, for alleviating this unconventional intersections: Continuous Flow problem [1]. The using of these conventional measures are Intersection (CFI), Parallel Flow Intersection (PFI) and limited as the modifications of intersection design, such as Upstream Signalized Crossover (USC). For this purpose, widening interchanges and building bypasses, are expensive various experimental designs, including traffic conditions, and disruptive [1]. In contrast, the unconventional arterial geometric features and signal plans, were set and the intersection design (UAID) is one of the methods that can average delays were compared for movements of efficiently reduce the congestion with less cost as compare through-only traffic and left-turn-only traffic. From the with the conventional measures. General principles of results of analysis, all three unconventional intersections operation and management strategies of the UAID include: 1) outperformed conventional one and among the emphasis on through traffic movements along the arterial; 2) unconventional intersections, CFI outperformed the reduction in the number of signal phases (e.g. left-turn arrow others except for some traffic conditions. In the balanced phase); and 3) reduction in the number of intersection conflict traffic condition scenario, at the low traffic volume level, points [2]. These principles allow the UAID to reduce the the average delays of through traffic for PFI were smaller traffic congestion at the intersection and improve the traffic than that of CFI and very similar at the moderate traffic safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning of Cargo Bike Hubs
    PLANNING OF CARGO BIKE HUBS A guide for municipalities and industry for the planning of transshipment hubs for new urban logistics concepts The project "Cargo Bike Hub" is funded by the Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure via the implementation of the National Cycling Plan 2020. Authors: Tom Assmann M. Sc. (ILM) Florian Müller M. Sc. (IPSY) Sebastian Bobeth M. Sc. (IPSY) Leonard Baum B. Sc. (ILM) Chair of Logistics Systems, Institute of Logistics and Material Handling Systems (ILM) Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Prof. E. h. Dr. h. c. mult. Michael Schenk Chair of Environmental Psychology, Institute of Psychology (IPSY) Prof. Dr. Ellen Matthies Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg October 2019 Layout and Design: FORMFLUTDESIGN – www.formflut.com English Version 2020 - Translation, Layout and Design CityChangerCargoBike Project The Project „Cargo Bike Depot“ was accompanied by the project advisory board with representatives from: Cargobike.jetzt; Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR); DPD Deutschland GmbH; Neomesh GmbH (CLAC-Aachen); PedalPower Schönstedt&Busack GbR; Stadt Köln – Amt für Straßen und Verkehrstechnik; United Parcel Service (UPS); Zentrum für angewandte Psychologie, Umwelt- und Sozialforschung (ZEUS GmbH). CONTENT 1. Objective 7 5. Components of planning 18 5.1 Implementation planning 18 5.2 Area 19 2. Basics of Urban Cycle logistics 7 5.3 Usage 20 2.1 Definition Cargo Bike 7 5.3.1 Cooperative vs. concessionary use 20 2.2 What types of cargo bikes are available 7 5.3.2 Combined uses vs. mixed
    [Show full text]
  • Truly Spectacular!
    Directions to Western Park Entrance Directions to Eastern Park Entrance Hiking Paths Observation Decks Sussex WESTERN PARK ENTRANCE Sussex Corner Fundy Trail All trail distances are one-way unless indicated with an * Accessible off trails within the parkway - may require a Parkway Easy Moderate Strenuous short hike Waterford St. Martins Hearst Lodge A Multi-Use Trail 10 km 1 Flowerpot Rock – 1 9 Sluiceway Observation Deck Alma Harbour 39 km Opening B Sea Captains’ Burial Ground Footpath 0.34 km 2 Flowerpot Rock – 2 10 Suspension Footbridge Sea Caves 2021 7 km H C Flowerpot Rock Scenic Footpath 1.5 km 3 Flowerpot Rock – 3 Observation Deck P9 I D 11 Interpretive Centre Bradshaw Scenic Footpath 0.6 km 4 Fuller Falls EASTERN PARK ENTRANCE Observation Deck E Pioneer Trail Loop * 0.48 km Observation Deck Fundy Trail Parkway 12 Tufts’ Plateau F Big Salmon River Loop * 1.2 km 5 Lighthouse Map Legend Lookouts Beaches G Suspension Footbridge Trail 0.39 km 13 Long Beach Observation Deck Easily accessed by driving James Catt Observation Deck 0 Beach 1 Melvin Beach L H 14 McCumber Brook 4 the parkway Monument 7 10 Hearst Lodge Scenic Footpath 2.7 km 6 Isle Haute EASTERN PARK Electric Vehicle Charge Station 2 Pangburn Beach I Cranberry Brook Loop * 4.8 km Observation Deck 1 1 Fox Rock Lookout Mitchell Franklin Bridge Observation Deck ENTRANCE S F Fundy Trail Parkway - 30 km 3 Big Salmon River Beach Suspension 6 J Big Salmon to Long Beach Footpath 4.4 km 15 McCumber Brook 2 Fownes Head Lookout 7 Waterfowl ROUTE TO (cars, buses, motorcycles) 4 Long Beach
    [Show full text]
  • Rulebook for Link Light Rail
    RULEBOOK FOR LINK LIGHT RAIL EFFECTIVE MARCH 31 2018 RULEBOOK FOR LINK LIGHT RAIL Link Light Rail Rulebook Effective March 31, 2018 CONTENTS SAFETY ................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2 ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 3 DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 5 SECTION 1 ............................................................................................................................20 OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT GENERAL RULES ...............................................................20 1.1 APPLICABILITY OF RULEBOOK ............................................................................20 1.2 POSSESSION OF OPERATING RULEBOOK .........................................................20 1.3 RUN CARDS ...........................................................................................................20 1.4 REQUIRED ITEMS ..................................................................................................20 1.5 KNOWLEDGE OF RULES, PROCEDURES, TRAIN ORDERS, SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS, DIRECTIVES, AND NOTICES .....................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • See Our Park Map of Water Bottle Refill Stations!
    D V L B S Spotts Park O’Reilly St T Sawyer St H I E Snover St Snover Jackson Hill St Hill Jackson THEWATERWORKS H Zane and Brady Washington Glenwood N Memorial Way HOUSTONAVE SHEPHERDDR Cemetery Cemetery buffalo BAYO U EORIALDR Carruth Overlook Carruth STUDEONTST Bridge EORIALDR Green Tree to Sixth Ward Nature Area 0.40 M.D. Anderson Buffalo Bayou has been a focal point in Houston’s Foundation Stairway Cleveland Park Fonde history since the Allen brothers founded the city in 0.42 Rec. Center (weekends and evenings aer 1836. Today, the bayou is once again the centerpiece Houston Police Tapley 5pm only) Hamill Foundation Stairway Officers’ Memorial Tributary St Sabine of its development. Rosemont Bridge Rusk St » St. Thomas High School 0.18 Buffalo Bayou Partnership (BBP) is the non-profit organiza- 0.80 0.56 Shepherd Gateway Scurlock Foundation Overlook LDR ORIA Lee & Joe Jamail Hobby Center tion revitalizing and transforming Buffalo Bayou from a gi from the Radoff Family E Sabine Promenade Jackson Hill Bridge Skatepark Bridge Shepherd Drive to the Port of Houston Turning Basin. From to Memorial Park 0.39 Jane Gregory spearheading capital projects such as the 160-acre Buffalo EORIALDR Hobby 1.14 Garden Center 0.45 Bayou Park to constructing hike and bike trails, operating Neumann Family Barbara Fish Daniel comprehensive clean-up and maintenance programs and Wortham Foundation Stairway Nature Play Area Waugh Grove offering thoughtful programming, Buffalo Bayou Partnership Bat Colony ALLENPKWY Brookfield Bridge « Walker St is reclaiming Houston’s unique waterfront. JOHNNYSTEELE Federal Reserve Bank City Hall Bud Light Amphitheater Crosby McKinney St » Annex This map will guide you as you walk, run, cycle or paddle LOSTLAKE DOPARK Outfall ONTROSEBLVD TAFTST Gillette St Gillette ELEANORTINSLEYPARK Bagby St City along the waterway and visit the many parks and historic SHEPHERDDR WAUHDR Sam Houston Park Hall sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Drive NOVEMBER 19, 2018 UPDATED JANUARY 31, 2019
    Miami Beach Neighborhood Greenways Bay Drive NOVEMBER 19, 2018 UPDATED JANUARY 31, 2019 p 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary p. 5 Goals and Objectives p. 7 Bay Drive Neighborhod Greenway p. 9 Existing Conditions p. 11 BAY DRIVE Bay Drive - Segment 1 p. 12 Bay Drive - Segment 2 p. 14 Bay Drive - Segment 3 p. 16 Landscaping p. 18 Safety and Access p. 19 Traffic Calming p. 20 71ST STREET AND NORMANDY DRIVE 71st Street and Normandy Drive p. 23 71st Street East - Segment 1 p. 24 71st Street West - Segment 2 p. 26 Normandy Drive East - Segment 1 p. 28 Normandy Drive West - Segment 2 p. 30 East Bridge p. 32 West Bridge p. 33 Landscaping p. 34 Safety - Bike Box p. 35 Parking Impact Analysis p. 36 Appendix Cost Estimates p. 42 Parking Replacement Analysis p. 48 Sidewalks Gap Analysis p. 56 Summary of Meetings p. 62 p 2 p 3 p 4 BAY DRIVE | City of Miami Beach Neighborhood Greenways EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background The Bay Drive Neighborhood Greenway concepts were then refined and reviewed extensively with Transportation staff and The adopted 2016 Miami Beach Transportation Master Plan internal Miami Beach stakeholders. The concepts were also was built on a mode share goal and modal prioritization strategy presented to the North Beach Steering Committee on October adopted by Resolution 2015-29083 on July 8, 2015, which 25, 2017. Transportation toured the area with TCED staff on places pedestrians first; transit, bicycles, and freight second; December 7, 2017. The Transportation, Parking and Bicycle and private automobiles third. Projects in the Transportation Facilities Committee reviewed the North Beach Neighborhood Master Plan are intended to move Miami Beach towards this Greenways concepts on April 9, 2017 and June 11, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Footpath Or Bridleway Leaves a Metalled Road the Highway Above
    28 CH. 41 Countryside Act 1968 1967 c. 86. (9) Section 67 of the Countryside (Scotland) Act 1967 (grants to local authorities) shall have effect in relation to the expenditure of a local planning authority in Scotland in or in connection with paying compensation under this section as it has effect in relation to the expenditure mentioned in that section. Tree 26. In section 125(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act preservation orders: 1962, so far as it relates to tree preservation orders, and in compensation section 26(2) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) under Act 1947 (both of which sections provide for compensation for Planning refusal of consent under tree preservation orders) for the words Acts. " damage or expenditure " there shall be substituted " loss or 1962 c. 38. damage ". 1947 c. 43. Public rights of way Signposting 27.-(1) A highway authority, after consultation with the of footpaths owner or occupier of the land concerned, shall have and bridle- power to ways. erect and maintain signposts along any footpath or bridleway for which they are the highway authority. (2) Subject to subsection (3) below, at every point where a footpath or bridleway leaves a metalled road the highway authority shall in exercise of their power under subsection (1) above erect and maintain a signpost- (a) indicating that the footpath or bridleway is a public footpath or bridleway, and (b) showing, so far as the highway authority consider convenient and appropriate, where the footpath or bridleway leads, and the distance to any place or places named on the signpost.
    [Show full text]
  • FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide
    BIKEWAY SELECTION GUIDE FEBRUARY 2019 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED February 2019 Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. FUNDING NUMBERS Bikeway Selection Guide NA 6. AUTHORS 5b. CONTRACT NUMBER Schultheiss, Bill; Goodman, Dan; Blackburn, Lauren; DTFH61-16-D-00005 Wood, Adam; Reed, Dan; Elbech, Mary 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION VHB, 940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500 REPORT NUMBER Raleigh, NC 27606 NA Toole Design Group, 8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 800 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Mobycon - North America, Durham, NC 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AND ADDRESS(ES) AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Tamara Redmon FHWA-SA-18-077 Project Manager, Office of Safety Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20590 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE This document is available to the public on the FHWA website at: NA https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike 13. ABSTRACT This document is a resource to help transportation practitioners consider and make informed decisions about trade- offs relating to the selection of bikeway types. This report highlights linkages between the bikeway selection process and the transportation planning process. This guide presents these factors and considerations in a practical process- oriented way. It draws on research where available and emphasizes engineering judgment, design flexibility, documentation, and experimentation. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES Bike, bicycle, bikeway, multimodal, networks, 52 active transportation, low stress networks 16. PRICE CODE NA 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Walk from Bury Knowle Park to the C. S. LEWIS NATURE
    Circular walk from Bury Knowle Park to the C. S. LEWIS NATURE RESERVE in Risinghurst, and on up to SHOTOVER; then a restricted byway to HORSPATH, and back to Headington through fields to THE RIDINGS (under 5½ miles/8.8 km) Walking boots essential in the Horspath area after rainy periods (1) Bury Knowle Park in central Headington to Risinghurst Leave Bury Knowle Park via the main gate, turn left on to the London Road, and cross that road at the first pelican crossing (opposite St Andrew’s School). Continue a short way eastwards on the London Road, and then take the first turning on the right down Wharton Road. Take the second turning on the left into St Leonard’s Road. Take the first turning on the right into Holley Crescent, and when it curves right, turn left on to Vallis Alley, the footpath that starts between Nos. 22 and 20 Holley Crescent. (This is a remnant of the old funeral path that the people of Quarry used to take to get to St Andrew’s Church before their own parish church opened in 1849.) If the alley is crowded, it is possible to go into Margaret Road recreation ground on the right and get back out on to the path again just before the pavilion. Continue on Vallis Alley all the way to the end, then cross Quarry High Street and enter the footpath that is opposite (Chapel Alley). The former Quarry Methodist Chapel of 1860 is on your left. At the end of Chapel Alley turn left into Quarry Hollow, then take the first right into Quarry School Place, with Headington Quarry Nursery School (formerly Headington Quarry National School) on your right.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Profile of Cycle Rickshaw Pullers: a Case Study
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by European Scientific Journal (European Scientific Institute) European Scientific Journal January edition vol. 8, No.1 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 UDC:656.12-05:316.35]:303.6(540)"2010" SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF CYCLE RICKSHAW PULLERS: A CASE STUDY Jabir Hasan Khan, PhD Tarique Hassan, PhD candidate Shamshad, PhD candidate Department of Geography Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh Abstract The present paper is an attempt to analyze the socio-economic characteristics of cycle rickshaw pullers and to find out the causes of rickshaw pulling. The adverse effects of this profession on the health of the rickshaw pullers, the problems faced by them and their remedial measures have been also taken into account. The study is based on primary data collected through the field survey and direct questionnaire to the respondents in Aligarh city. The survey was carried out during the months of February and March, 2010. The overall analysis of the study reveals that the rickshaw pullers are one of the poorest sections of the society, living in abject poverty but play a pivotal role in intra-city transportation system. Neither is their working environment regulated nor their social security issues are addressed. They are also unaware about the governmental schemes launched for poverty alleviation and their accessibility in basic amenities and infrastructural facilities is also very poor. Keywords: Abject poverty, breadwinners, cycle rickshaw pullers, disadvantageous, intra- city transport, vulnerability 310 European Scientific Journal January edition vol. 8, No.1 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 Introduction: The word rickshaw originates from the Japanese word ‘jinrikisha’, which literally means human-powered vehicle (Encyclopedia Britannica, 1993).
    [Show full text]