Systèmes De Transport (SETEC TPI / XELIS) AVERTISSEMENT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Systèmes De Transport (SETEC TPI / XELIS) AVERTISSEMENT Arc Express débat public sur le métro de rocade DOSSIER DES ÉTUDES étude Systèmes de transport (SETEC TPI / XELIS) AVERTISSEMENT Les études préalables, dont fait partie le document qui suit, ont été réalisées en 2008- 2009 afin d’élaborer le Dossier d’Objectifs et de Caractéristiques Principales présenté au Conseil du STIF en juillet 2009 et qui a servi d’appui à la constitution du dossier de saisine de la Commission nationale du débat-public. Ces études avaient pour objet premier de valider la faisabilité du projet Arc Express. Réalisées par différents prestataires du STIF, elles ne portent pas nécessairement la position retenue in fine par le STIF dans le dossier du maître d’ouvrage élaboré pour le débat public, ce dossier étant aussi le fruit d’une maturation des sujets au sein des équipes du STIF, éclairée par ces études mais également le fruit d’échanges avec les partenaires du projet. Dans ces études préalables, plusieurs éléments ont pu être retenus comme des postulats permettant un chiffrage du projet ou servant de base aux études de trafic. Il en va par exemple du positionnement des stations intermédiaires évoqué dans certains rapports. Ces choix a priori n’avaient qu’une visée méthodologique. Seules les étapes de concertation à venir permettront de définir les caractéristiques et les tracés précis du projet Arc Express. Si le STIF décide de poursuivre le projet à l’issue du débat public, de nouvelles études approfondies seront menées en vue de l’enquête publique, puis lors de l’élaboration de l’avant-projet détaillé. Contenu du dossier des études : >> Perspectives de croissance urbaine (IAU) ; >> Etudes des enjeux transports et études de trafic (STIF) ; >> Etude des points de maillage potentiels (RATP) ; >> Etudes des pôles d’échanges SNCF/ Arc Express (SNCF) ; >> Etude d’une solution de système de transport en synergie technique avec les réseaux ferrés RATP (RATP) ; >> Etudes de systèmes de transport (SETEC TPI / XELIS) ; >> Etudes d’insertion de tracés, d’impact sommaire et rédaction du DOCP (SETEC TPI /XELIS / INGEROP) ; >> Synthèse et extraits du rapport études exploratoires des modalités de financement du projet Arc Express liées aux retombées économiques du projet s’agissant des aspects « montages contractuels » et « financement du projet » (DS Avocats / SP2000 / Paul Hastings / KPMG / Atis Real / Arcadis) ; ARC EXPRESS ÉTUDES DE SYSTÈMES DE TRANSPORT Maître d’Ouvrage Stif 11 Avenue de Villars 75007 Paris Rapport Phase 1 Bureau d’étude mandataire Bureau d’étude co-traitant Typologie des systèmes setec tpi xelis existants, en service ou en Tour Gamma D Bâtiment Hautacam H1 développement 58, quai de la Rapée 12 Avenue du Val de Fontenay 75583 Paris cedex 12 94120 Fontenay-sous-Bois Tél. : 01.40.04.59.25 Tél. : 01.58.77.08.65 Echelle (s) : Télécopie : 01.40.04.59.20 Télécopie : 01.58.77.18.94 Sans objet Email : [email protected] Email : [email protected] Date : 02.10.2008 Référence : Indices : Société : Affaire Emet. : Type : Phase : Numéro : Dif. : Rev. : 003 23815 S T 004 A A 02.10..2008 J.-F Sanchez A. du Chéné A. Raynaud Première émission Dif. Rev. Date Auteur Vérificateur Approbateur Modification Référence : Indices : Société : Affaire Emet. : Type : Phase : Numéro : Dif. : Rev. : 003 23815 S T 004 A Arc Express – Étude de systèmes de transport RAPPORT DE LA PHASE 1 – TYPOLOGIE DES SYSTÈMES SOMMAIRE INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1. INVENTAIRE..............................................................................................................4 1.1 MÉTROS ET TRAMWAYS................................................................................................4 1.2 MONORAILS .................................................................................................................7 1.3 EXEMPLES DE SYSTÈMES DE TRANSPORT URBAIN AUTOMATIQUES ................................8 1.3.1 Vancouver .................................................................................................................9 1.3.2 Singapour................................................................................................................10 1.3.3 Copenhague............................................................................................................12 1.3.4 Dubaï ....................................................................................................................... 13 1.3.5 Barcelone ................................................................................................................15 1.3.6 Taipei....................................................................................................................... 16 1.3.7 Toulouse .................................................................................................................17 1.4 PRINCIPAUX CONSTRUCTEURS ET PRINCIPAUX PRODUITS............................................18 1.5 TYPOLOGIE................................................................................................................20 1.5.1 Réserve de capacité...............................................................................................20 1.5.2 Caratéristiques de développement....................................................................... 21 1.5.3 Dimensions des véhicules .................................................................................... 22 1.5.4 Conclusions............................................................................................................23 2. CARACTÉRISTIQUES TECHNIQUES.................................................................... 24 2.1 CARACTÉRISTIQUES DE LA LIGNE ET DE L’EXPLOITATION ............................................24 2.2 CARACTÉRISTIQUES DU MATÉRIEL ROULANT...............................................................24 2.3 CARACTÉRISTIQUES DES AUTOMATISMES ................................................................... 24 2.4 CARACTÉRISTIQUES DES INFRASTRUCTURES ..............................................................28 2.4.1 Infrastructures en section courante ..................................................................... 28 2.4.1.1. Tracés en plan et en profil ..........................................................................28 2.4.1.2. Dimensions intérieures des ouvrages.........................................................30 2.4.2 Stations ................................................................................................................... 32 2.4.3 Garage / atelier ....................................................................................................... 34 3. COÛTS, DÉLAIS ET RISQUES ...............................................................................35 3.1 COÛTS DE CONSTRUCTION ......................................................................................... 35 3.2 COÛTS D’EXPLOITATION .............................................................................................37 3.3 RISQUES ÉVENTUELS ................................................................................................. 38 Révision n° 23815 – S/T/004/A 02/10/2008 Page 1/45 Arc Express – Étude de systèmes de transport RAPPORT DE LA PHASE 1 – TYPOLOGIE DES SYSTÈMES 4. DÉFINITION DE SYSTÈMES CIBLES .................................................................... 40 4.1 OBJECTIF .................................................................................................................. 40 4.2 APPROCHE PROPOSÉE ...............................................................................................40 4.2.1 Définition.................................................................................................................40 4.2.2 Données d’entrée ................................................................................................... 41 4.2.3 Méthodologie .......................................................................................................... 42 4.3 ENTRETIEN AVEC LES INDUSTRIELS ............................................................................44 Révision n° 23815 – S/T/004/A 02/10/2008 Page 2/45 Arc Express – Étude de systèmes de transport RAPPORT DE LA PHASE 1 – TYPOLOGIE DES SYSTÈMES INTRODUCTION Ce document constitue le rapport de la phase 1 de l’étude « Arc express – Études de systèmes de transport » réalisée par SETEC TPI - XELIS pour le compte du Syndicat des Transports d’Île-de-France. Ce rapport traite de la typologie des systèmes de transport urbains existants, en service ou en développement conformément aux Cahier des Clauses Techniques Particulières. Il comporte : . Un inventaire des systèmes de transport urbains automatiques dans le monde ainsi qu’une analyse plus détaillée de certains de ces systèmes qui permettent d’illustrer les facteurs clés du développement et de la typologie de tels systèmes ; . Un inventaire des principaux constructeurs et produits intervenant dans la sphère des métros automatiques ; . Une analyse typologique des métros automatiques qui porte essentiellement sur les éléments de réserve de capacité, les caractéristiques de développement et les dimensions de véhicules ; . Une description générale illustrée d’exemples des caractéristiques techniques des métros automatiques : ligne et exploitation, matériel roulant, automatismes et infrastructures ; . Des éléments concernant les coûts, délais et risques relatifs à la construction d’un système tel qu’Arc Express ; . Une proposition
Recommended publications
  • Modelling Walking Accessibility to Public Transport Terminals
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Modelling walking accessibility to public transport terminals Sony Sulaksono Wibowo 2005 Sony, S. W. (2005). Modelling walking accessibility to public transport terminals. Master’s thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/12007 https://doi.org/10.32657/10356/12007 Nanyang Technological University Downloaded on 24 Sep 2021 19:39:21 SGT ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library Modelling Walking Accessi biI ity to Public Transport Terminals Sony Sulaksono Wibowo School of Civil & Environmental Engineering A thesis submitted to Nanyang Technological University in fulfilment of requirement for the degree of Master of Engineering 2005 ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Alhamdulillah - Praise be to Allah SWT, the Cherisher and Sustainers of the worlds. First at all, I am thankful and grateful to my supervisor, Associate Professor Piotr Olszewski, for his guidance, advice, and encouragement throughout the duration of my research. The patience, effort and time that he devoted to me have enabled me to complete and present my research in this form. I also appreciate his generous kindness given to me on the matters not related to my research. My sincere appreciation is given to Professor Henry Fan, Associate Professor Wong Yiik Diew, Associate Professor Lum Kit Meng, and all faculty members of the Transportation Division of the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) NTU. My individual appreciation is given to Associate Professor Harianto Rahardjo for his support and kindness to me passing through the difficulties time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Real-Time Tracking System for Public Train in Malaysia
    Journal of Applied Technology and Innovation (e-ISSN: 2600-7304) vol. 3,no. 1, (2019) 1 RT-Train: A Real-Time Tracking System for Public Train in Malaysia Ng Seng Yong1, Mien May Chong2 and Lai Chew Ping3 School of Computing, Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology, Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation (APU), Technology Park Malaysia, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract— Real-time Public Train Tracking System is a system for towards the public transport also one of the important issues the train user to check the train schedule, track the upcoming that affecting the usage of the public transport. train’s location in real-time, and receiving announcement via push notification. In this paper, a new prototype of the Real-Time Public Train Tracking System called “RT-Train” was introduced. This proposed system can reduce the congestion of train users and allows train users to know the accurate train schedule and the real- time location of the train. Besides, it allows the train users to receive the push notification if the train is delayed. In this paper, we had also included an Abstract Architecture in explaining the system flow of the proposed system by using use case diagram. In the testing stage, four (4) major sub stages includes Unit Testing, Integration Testing, System Testing and User Acceptance Testing (UAT) have been done. From the results, all the actual results are same as the expected results. As a conclusion, the proposed system has achieved all the objectives that aimed by us.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Smart Card Data to Extract Passenger's Spatio-Temporal Density and Train's Trajectory of MRT System
    Using Smart Card Data to Extract Passenger’s Spatio-temporal Density and Train’s Trajectory of MRT System Lijun Sun Der-Horng Lee Alex Erath National University of National University of Future Cities Laboratory Singapore Singapore Singapore-ETH Centre Future Cities Laboratory [email protected] [email protected] Singapore-ETH Centre [email protected] Xianfeng Huang Future Cities Laboratory Singapore-ETH Centre [email protected] ABSTRACT Thus, with this model, the location of a certain train and Rapid tranit systems are the most important public trans- the number of onboard passengers can be estimated, which portation service modes in many large cities around the can further enable transit agencies to improve their response world. Hence, its service reliability is of high importance for to service disruptions. Since the respective final destination government and transit agencies. Despite taking all the nec- can also be derived from the data set, one can develop effec- essary precautions, disruptions cannot be entirely prevented tive failure response scenarios such as the planning of con- but what transit agencies can do is to prepare to respond tingency buses that bring passengers directly to their final to failure in a timely and effective manner. To this end, in- destinations and thus relieves the bridging buses that are formation about daily travel demand patterns are crucial to typically made available in such situations. develop efficient failure response strategies. To the extent of urban computing, smart card data offers us the opportu- Categories and Subject Descriptors nity to investigate and understand the demand pattern of H.2.8 [Database Management]: Database Applications— passengers and service level from transit operators.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP Report 37 – Guidebook for Planning and Implementing
    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 37 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Guidebook for Planning and Implementing Automated People Mover Systems at Airports ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS James Wilding CHAIR: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (re- Governments, Arlington tired) VICE CHAIR: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore VICE CHAIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board Jeff Hamiel MEMBERS Minneapolis–St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY Allen D. Biehler, Secretary, Pennsylvania DOT, Harrisburg MEMBERS Larry L. Brown, Sr., Executive Director, Mississippi DOT, Jackson James Crites Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport Norfolk, VA Richard de Neufville William A.V. Clark, Professor, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles Massachusetts Institute of Technology Eugene A. Conti, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, North Carolina DOT, Raleigh Kevin C. Dolliole Unison Consulting Nicholas J. Garber, Henry L. Kinnier Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, and Director, John K. Duval Center for Transportation Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville Austin Commercial, LP Jeffrey W. Hamiel, Executive Director, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minneapolis, MN Kitty Freidheim Paula J. Hammond, Secretary, Washington State DOT, Olympia Freidheim Consulting Steve Grossman Edward A. (Ned) Helme, President, Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC Jacksonville Aviation Authority Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Tom Jensen Susan Martinovich, Director, Nevada DOT, Carson City National Safe Skies Alliance Debra L.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3 Project Description Projek Mass Rapid Transit Laluan 2 : Sg
    Section 3 Project Description Projek Mass Rapid Transit Laluan 2 : Sg. Buloh – Serdang - Putrajaya Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment SECTION 3 : PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3. SECTION 3 : PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 INTRODUCTION The main objective of the Project is to facilitate future travel demand in the Klang Valley and to complement the connectivity to Kuala Lumpur by improving the current rail coverage and increasing accessibility of public transport network to areas not currently served or covered by public transport. The SSP Line will serve the existing residential areas, minimize overlapping with existing rail service and provide convenient access to Kuala Lumpur city centre. This section describes the Project in terms of the proposed alignment and stations, the planning and design basis, operation system and the construction methodology. 3.2 PLANNING AND DESIGN BASIS The over-arching principles in the development of the KVMRT is even network coverage, entry into the city centre, location of stations in densely populated areas and ability to sustain future expansion. The GKL/KV PTMP has identified key issues in the rail network such as capacity and quality of existing systems, integration between modes, gaps in network coverage and mismatch in land use planning. Considering the gap in the network, particularly in the northwest – southern corridor, the SSP Line is designed to serve the city centre to Sg Buloh, Kepong, Serdang and Putrajaya areas. The SSP Line will traverse through high density residential and commercial areas and has the capacity to move large volumes of people from the suburban areas to the employment and business centres. In terms of planning basis, the main objectives of the Project are as follows:- • To meet the increasing demand for rail based urban public transportation • To increase the railway network coverage and its capacity • To provide better integration between the new SSP Line and existing rail lines such as LRT, Monorail, SBK Line and KTM lines as well as the future High Spee Rail.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Memorandum for Mercatus' Multi-Currency Medium
    IMPORTANT NOTICE NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES OR TO U.S. PERSONS IMPORTANT: You must read the following disclaimer before continuing. The following disclaimer applies to the attached information memorandum. You are advised to read this disclaimer carefully before accessing, reading or making any other use of the attached information memorandum. In accessing the attached information memorandum, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them from time to time, each time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. Confirmation of Your Representation: In order to be eligible to view the attached information memorandum or make an investment decision with respect to the securities, investors must not be a U.S. person (within the meaning of Regulation S under the Securities Act (as defined below)). The attached information memorandum is being sent at your request and by accepting the e-mail and accessing the attached information memorandum, you shall be deemed to have represented to us (1) that you are not resident in the United States (“U.S.”) nor a U.S. Person, as defined in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), nor are you acting on behalf of a U.S. Person, the electronic mail address that you gave us and to which this e-mail has been delivered is not located in the U.S. and, to the extent you purchase the securities described in the attached information memorandum, you will be doing so pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act, and (2) that you consent to delivery of the attached information memorandum and any amendments or supplements thereto by electronic transmission.
    [Show full text]
  • Véhicule Automatique Léger
    Véhicule automatique léger Véhicule automatique léger (VAL, deutsch: „leichtes automatisches Fahrzeug“) ist ein besonders leicht gebautes, fahrerloses, spurgeführtes Personennahverkehrsmittel, das sowohl als Peoplemover z. B. in Flughäfen als auch als Stadtschnellbahnsystem eingesetzt wird. Ursprünglich von Matra entwickelt, ist VAL heute ein Produkt von Siemens Mobility. Inhaltsverzeichnis Technik VAL 208 (links) und VAL 206 der Neoval Métro Lille Cityval Airval Installationen Fahrzeugtypen Projekte Galerie Siehe auch Einzelnachweise Weblinks Technik Die Trag- und Antriebsfunktion wird durch gummibereifte Räder auf einem Betonfahrweg ausgeübt. Seitliche Führungsräder rollen an seitlich angebrachten Führungsschienen entlang. An Stellen, wo die seitlichen Führungsschienen unterbrochen sind, wie beispielsweise in Weichen, übernehmen Führungsschienen in der Fahrwegmitte die seitliche Führung. Die Val 206 der Metro Toulouse auf der Weichenfunktion wird durch eine einzelne Führungsschienen übernehmen die Linie A Zunge zwischen den Führungsschienen seitliche Führung in einer Weiche – realisiert, in etwa vergleichbar mit einer hier OrlyVAL. beweglichen Herzstückspitze in Weichen von Zweischienenbahnen. Das System basiert auf einer Erfindung von Professor Robert Gabillard (Université Lille Nord de France) und wurde Anfang der 1980er Jahre von der Firma Matra Transport entwickelt. Die Abteilung Verkehrstechnik von Matra gehört seit 2001 vollständig zu Siemens Transportation Systems. Erstmals angewendet wurde das VAL-System 1983 bei der damals neu gebauten Métro Lille. Es eignet sich aufgrund der geringeren Kosten besonders gut für mittelgroße Städte. Das Akronym bedeutete ursprünglich Villeneuve-d’Ascq à Lille (deutsch: „Villeneuve-d’Ascq nach Lille“) und bezeichnete die beiden Endpunkte der ersten Strecke. Erst später wurde daraus véhicule automatique léger. Wie auch bei einigen anderen fahrerlosen Personenbeförderungssystemen sind die Bahnsteige beim VAL-System durch transparente Glaswände mit eingelassenen Bahnsteigtüren von den Gleisen getrennt.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapur: Schienenverkehr
    AUSSEN WIRTSCHAFT BRANCHENREPORT SINGAPUR SCHIENENVERKEHR BRANCHE UND MARKTSITUATION TRENDS UND ENTWICKLUNGEN CHANCEN FÜR ÖSTERREICHISCHE UNTERNEHMEN AUSSENWIRTSCHAFTSCENTER SINGAPUR MÄRZ 2020 1 Eine Information des AußenwirtschaftsCenters Singapur Wirtschaftsdelegierter Mag. David Bachmann T +65 6396 6350 F +65 6396 6340 E [email protected] fb.com/aussenwirtschaft twitter.com/wko_aw linkedIn.com/company/aussenwirtschaft-austria youtube.com/aussenwirtschaft flickr.com/aussenwirtschaftaustria www.austria-ist-ueberall.at Dieser Branchenreport wurde im Rahmen der Internationalisierungsoffensive go-international, einer Förder- initiative des Bundesministeriums für Digitalisierung und Wirtschaftsstandort und der Wirtschaftskammer Österreich erstellt. Das Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Alle Rechte, insbesondere die Rechte der Verbreitung, der Vervielfältigung, der Übersetzung, des Nachdrucks und die Wiedergabe auf fotomechanischem oder ähnlichem Wege durch Fotokopie, Mikrofilm oder andere elektronische Verfahren sowie der Speicherung in Datenverarbeitungsanlagen bleiben, auch bei nur auszugsweiser Verwertung, der Wirtschaftskammer Österreich – AUSSENWIRTSCHAFT AUSTRIA vorbehalten. Die Wiedergabe mit Quellenangabe ist vorbehaltlich anders lautender Bestimmungen gestattet. Es wird darauf hingewiesen, dass alle Angaben trotz sorgfältiger Bearbeitung ohne Gewähr erfolgen und eine Haftung der Wirtschaftskammer Österreich – AUSSENWIRTSCHAFT AUSTRIA ausgeschlossen ist. Darüber hinaus ist jede gewerbliche Nutzung dieses Werkes der Wirtschaftskammer
    [Show full text]
  • MRT) System, with 42 Stations and Costing S$5 Billion, Was Fully Completed in July 1990, Within Budget and Schedule
    1 Annex A Singapore's First Mass Rapid Transit System The North-South and East-West Lines of the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) System, with 42 stations and costing S$5 billion, was fully completed in July 1990, within budget and schedule. The engineering work was massive and complex. Over the course of the project, Singapore engineers acquired the necessary skills and knowledge to develop other MRT lines. It was re-known as the world’s first metro system with Platform Screen Doors that save on energy. Today the MRT system carries about 2 million passengers per day. It serves the densely populated towns and brings the commuters directly into high employment centres and the CBD. It also serves the three regional centres. By providing good accessibility, it supports the economic growth and enhances the social well-being of Singapore residents. It has enabled dense urban development in land-scarce Singapore. The MRT was a major milestone in the transformation of Singapore into a modern metropolis. Driverless Mass Rapid System (North East Line) The North East Line (NEL) is the world’s first fully automated underground driverless heavy rail rapid transit line, consisting of 16 stations and stretching 20km from Punggol to HarbourFront. NEL was conceptualised as a fully automated railway with high level of system integration. At that time, new cutting edge technologies for the signalling, communication, rolling stock and integrated supervisory control systems were employed, such as microwave signalling transmission, digital trunk radio, Communication Backbone Network, in-car CCTV monitoring and fully integrated control system. One technology critical in driverless trains is the Automatic Train Operation System, which performs functions previously handled by the train driver.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Powerpoint
    Siemens Industry Mobility Cityval ® A Solução Verde para a Mobilidade das Cidades Brasileiras Apresentação: Rezier Possidente Siemens Ltda . 1 Agosto de 2009 © Siemens Industry – Mobility – Turn Key Cityval ® Cityval O Cityval é um conceito inovador de transporte automático, resultado da parceria , na França, entre duas conceituadas companhias: a Siemens e a Lohr Industrie . O Cityval é construído com base na vasta experiência da Siemens, principalmente com o veículo Val, em projetos de excelência em segurança e confiabilidade, aliada a soluções inovadoras do parceiro Lohr, tornando o Cityval um veículo, sobretudo, eficiente. A nova geração do Sistema Automático de Transporte 2 Agosto de 2009 © Siemens Industry – Mobility – Turn Key Alto investimento da Siemens em P&D para prover solu ççções eficientes aos desafios do novo s éééculo Em 2008, a Siemens investiu €€€ 3.78 bilhões em P&D para prover solu ções avan çadas relacionadas as megatendências de urbaniza ção, mudan ças demogr áficas, água, energia, mobilidade e seguran ça. No campo do transporte p úblico, a Siemens introduziu o Cityval, com o desafio de contribuir significantemente para: Aumentar a atratividade do transporte p úúúblico Reduzir os congestionamentos e a polui ççção Reduzir o consumo de energia Aumentar a seguran ççça do espa ççço p úúúblico O Cityval tamb ém proporciona aos cidadãos um sistema de transporte inteligente e eficiente enquanto garante a todos um novo padrão de conforto e seguran ça. O Cityval ajuda as cidades a contribu ííírem ativamente com o Protocolo
    [Show full text]
  • A Primer on SMRT's Ongoing Effort to Renew and Improve the North-South
    your journey matters EDITION 1: OCTOBER 2015 A primer on SMRT’s ongoing effort to renew and improve the North-South and East-West Lines introduction tremendous amount of work is being put into engineers and contractors maximise the time spent on the renewing and upgrading the North-South and track so that attention can be given to the more urgent East-West Lines (NSEWL), Singapore’s oldest, maintenance and repair tasks as well as to the upgrade and longest and most heavily utilised MRT lines. renewal projects. AThe work takes place every day even as the rail network continues to serve passengers for around 20 hours a day and as the system copes with increased ridership. AT PRESENT, OUR ATTENTION IS FOCUSED The transformation of the NSEWL is a complex engineering ON KEY ENGINEERING PROJECTS SUCH AS: project. It represents the first major upgrade for the lines since they started operations in 1987. Indeed, the renewal Re-sleepering NSL 3rd Rail Replacement of the NSEWL is said to be the biggest modernisation EWL project on a “live” MRT system anywhere in the world. 100% 10% This modernisation effort will lead to an updated and Re-sleepering EWL renewed railway system that will allow SMRT to run more 3rd Rail Replacement trains, carry more passengers and serve our passengers 10% NSL better with faster connections across the MRT network. The multi-year, multi-project effort takes place seven days Re-signalling NSL 0% a week, all-year round. Much of the work takes place away from the public eye in train depots, deep underground 91% Adding New Trains in train tunnels or during the early hours of the morning when trains stop running.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipoh to Kuala Lumpur Train Schedule
    Ipoh To Kuala Lumpur Train Schedule Involutional and maledictory Demosthenis chunter while subentire Yacov overbook her bookcase earnestly and counterbore somnolently. Unbenignant Clarence bonds gyrally while Thorny always dehydrogenating his Pissarro thermalize pestilentially, he flite so blackguardly. Barest Connie practice accordingly. You manage related posts from trees being purchased from tomorrow, to schedule interval could not work with tripadvisor travelers whose schedules change your print my travels Your nickname, the Mailchimp Launchpad Academy for information technology and computer science majors has become an example of the kind of experiential learning Clayton State is known for. Farley Post Office on Eighth Avenue, natural hot spring, yes you can book normal class tickets from Ipoh to KL Sentral. Beside trains you will often find bus connections. LIRR Stations with Unrestricted Weekend Parking. PSMB will not compromise the act of submitting false information to PSMB. Dropdowns per each week. Other than being a transport hub, the only way how to get to KL is to travel by bus, so the only option left is to take bus from TBS to Sungai Bentayan Bus Terminal in Muar. Custom Element is not supported by this version of the Editor. Malaya followed this style and shared many similar features. Batu Caves in Kuala Lumpur. Flash it again when the conductor comes through the train to check for tickets. All northbound KTM trains terminate at Padang Besar. The main KTM railway line, arranging content in a readable and attractive way. Seremban ktm ticket as kuala pilah, train to our comparison railways limited selection. The Schedule of Classes is subject to change.
    [Show full text]