DOCSLIB.ORG

FY2018 PROPOSED BUDGET Effective July 1, 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FY2018 PROPOSED BUDGET Effective July 1, 2017 ENHANCING SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FY2018 PROPOSED BUDGET Effective July 1, 2017 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Fiscal Year 2018 Proposed Budget Table of Contents General Manager/CEO Message .....................................................................................................i Board of Directors .........................................................................................................................iii Chapter 1 - Introduction ..............................................................................................................1-1 Chapter 2 - Proposed Budget Summary ......................................................................................2-1 Chapter 3 - Operating Budget Detail ...........................................................................................3-1 Chapter 4 - Capital Budget ..........................................................................................................4-1 Appendix A - Sustainability .......................................................................................................A-1 Appendix B - Capital Improvement Plan.....................................................................................B-1 Appendix C - Human Capital Summary .................................................................................... C-1 Appendix D - Budget Process ....................................................................................................D-1 Appendix E - Financial Standards ..............................................................................................E-1 Appendix F - Debt Service ..........................................................................................................F-1 Appendix G - Operating Statistics ..............................................................................................G-1 Appendix H - Glossary of Terms ...............................................................................................H-1 Appendix I - Glossary of Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................. I-1 General Manager/CEO Message Enhancing Safety, Service Reliability and Financial Responsibility As I mark my one year and overall customer experience, while reducing anniversary at Metro, I fully service delays. These include: appreciate the challenges we Improved train reliability and fewer offloads face to restore public confidence in Metro’s safety By December 2017, all 1000 series railcars and reliability and to meet will be retired Metro’s financial needs. We Intense maintenance campaigns on the have taken important first legacy railcar fleets to improve doors, steps, including hiring new brakes, propulsion and HVAC systems executive leadership, implementing SafeTrack Rebalancing of railcars across yards to repairs, expediting delivery of the new 7000 series avoid missed train dispatchments railcars, and completing our recent financial audit A new track maintenance program that on time with no new findings. takes full advantage of the additional hours As the next step forward, I have laid out Metro’s available from reduced late night service Back2Good plan with a focus on a new preventive Improved station experience maintenance program to avoid unnecessary delays due to track problems and a Railcar Get Well Plan Major lighting improvements and extreme to keep our trains operating safely and on time. cleaning at select stations The coming fiscal year presents another challenge – Enhanced signage and customer eliminating a nearly $300 million operating budget information shortfall that is in part a product of Metro’s Fare simplification governance and funding structure, as well as Permanent implementation of SelectPass ridership decline in the face of Metro’s need to rebuild key system infrastructure to ensure safe and New combination one-day rail/bus pass at reliable service delivery. no extra charge To meet these challenges, I have proposed a With this budget, Metro is aligning the system and “Reality Check” budget focused on enhancing its services to what the region can afford and is system safety and the reliability of rail, bus and directing available resources to best serve the riders paratransit services that our riders demand. The we have today. I look forward to working with plan scales back train and bus services to more customers, the Board of Directors, and our closely align with current ridership demand and jurisdictional partners to continue enhancing includes fare increases as well as additional support Metro’s safety, service reliability and financial from regional partners. The plan also makes drastic responsibility. cuts to management and labor costs and demands . improved productivity from our personnel and contractors. Key initiatives proposed in the FY2018 Operating Budget and the FY2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program will help bring Metro’s infrastructure and Paul J. Wiedefeld service reliability Back2Good by improving safety General Manager/Chief Executive Officer Board of Directors The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority is governed by a 16-member Board of Directors composed of eight Principal and eight Alternate members. The District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia and the federal government each appoint two Principal and two Alternate members. Below are the members currently serving on the Board. Jack Evans, Chair Appointed to the Board as a Principal Director in January of 2015 representing the District of Columbia. Mr. Evans has served on the Council of the District of Columbia (Ward 2) since 1991. Keturah D. Harley, First Vice Chair Appointed to the Board as a Principal Director in April of 2015 representing the State of Maryland. Ms. Harley has worked in the federal government as an Appellate Litigation Attorney at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and with the District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board (PERB), where she served as General Counsel and Executive Director (Acting). Jim Corcoran, Second Vice Chair Appointed to the Board as a Principal Director in February of 2015 representing the Commonwealth of Virginia. Since April 2010, Mr. Corcoran has served as President and CEO of the Fairfax County Chamber of Commerce. David L. Strickland Appointed to the Board as Principal Director in June of 2016 representing the Federal Government. Mr. Strickland served as the fourteenth Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHSTA). Prior to his appointment at NHTSA, Mr. Strickland spent 8 years on the Staff of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation as Democratic Senior Counsel. Corbett A. Price Appointed to the Board as a Principal Director in March of 2015 representing the District of Columbia. Mr. Price currently serves as Chairman and CEO of Quantix Health Capital, LLC. Michael Goldman Appointed to the Board as a Principal Director in June of 2013 representing the State of Maryland. Mr. Goldman has practiced in the areas of international, antitrust and transportation law. Catherine Hudgins Appointed to the Board as a Principal Director in 2008 representing the State of Virginia. Mrs. Hudgins served as Chair in both 2011 and 2012. She joined the Board in January of 2004 as an Alternate Director. She was first elected to the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors in November 1999 and is currently serving her third term. Carol Carmody Appointed to the Board as a Principal Director in June of 2016 representing the Federal Government. Ms. Carmody served for five years as a member of the National Transportation Safety Board, was appointed Vice Chairman by President Clinton and served twice as Acting Chairman. Her government career included the Senate Commerce Committee, and Departments of State and Transportation. Tom Bulger Appointed to the Board as an Alternate Director in July 2011 representing the District of Columbia. Mr. Bulger is President of Government Relations Inc., and has been a federal advocate and policy consultant. Malcolm Augustine Appointed to the Board as an Alternate Director in January of 2016 representing Prince George’s County, Maryland. Mr. Augustine is a multi- channel marketing, sales, analytics and customer relationship executive in the direct marketing sector with expertise in higher education, non-profit, and healthcare at Intra Mail Network. Christian Dorsey Appointed to the Board as an Alternate Director in January of 2016 representing Arlington County, Virginia. Mr. Dorsey was elected to the Arlington County Board in November of 2015. He also represents Arlington on the board of the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments and serves as one of three Arlington commissioners of The Northern Virginia Transportation Commission (NVTC). Robert Lauby Appointed to the Board as an Alternate Director in June of 2016 representing the Federal Government. Mr. Lauby has 37 years of railroad and rail transit experience involving safety, security, accident investigation, project management, project engineering, manufacturing, and vehicle maintenance. He currently serves as Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety and Chief Safety Officer with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). Leif A. Dormsjo Appointed to the Board as an Alternate Director in March of 2015 representing the District of Columbia. Mr. Dormsjo was confirmed the Director of the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) in 2015 after serving as an Alternate Director. He previously
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Advanced Technology Equipment Manufacturers*
    Advanced Technology Equipment Manufacturers* Revised 04/21/2020 On-Road (Medium/Heavy Duty, Terminal Tractors) OEM Model Technology Vocations GVWR Type Altec Industries, Inc Altec 12E8 JEMS ePTO ePTO ePTO, Utility > 33,000, 26,001 - 33,000 New Altec Industries, Inc Altec JEMS 1820 and 18E20 ePTO ePTO ePTO, Utility > 33,000, 26,001 - 33,000 New Altec Industries, Inc Altec JEMS 4E4 with 3.6 kWh Battery ePTO ePTO, Utility 16,001-19,500, 19,501-26,000 New Altec Industries, Inc Altec JEMS 6E6 with 3.6 kWh Battery ePTO ePTO, Utility 16,001-19,500, 19,501-26,000 New Autocar Autocar 4x2 and 6x4 Xpeditor with Cummins-Westport ISX12N Engine Near-Zero Engine Truck > 33,001 New Autocar Autocar 4x2 and 6x4 Xpeditor with Cummins-Westport L9N Engine Near-Zero Engine Refuse > 33,001 New Blue Bird Blue Bird Electric Powered All American School Bus Zero Emission Bus, School Bus > 30,000 New Blue Bird Blue Bird Electric Powered Vision School Bus 4x2 Configuration Zero Emission Bus, School Bus > 30,000 New BYD Motors BYD 8Y Electric Yard Tractor Zero Emission Terminal Truck 81,000 New BYD Motors BYD C10 45' All-Electric Coach Bus Zero Emission Bus 49,604 New BYD Motors BYD C10MS 45' All-Electric Double-Decker Coach Bus Zero Emission Transit Bus 45' New BYD Motors BYD C6 23' All-Electric Coach Bus Zero Emission Bus 18,331 New BYD Motors BYD K11 60' Articulated All-Electric Transit Bus Zero Emission Bus 65,036 New BYD Motors BYD K7M 30' All-Electric Transit Bus Zero Emission Bus, Transit Bus 30' New BYD Motors BYD K9 40' All-Electric Transit Bus Zero Emission
    [Show full text]
  • NEW FLYER INDUSTRIES INC. Annual Information Form
    NEW FLYER INDUSTRIES INC. Annual Information Form March 24, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL ................................................................................................................................................... 1 CORPORATE STRUCTURE ..................................................................................................................... 3 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS .................................................................................. 4 Recent Developments ..................................................................................................................... 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS ......................................................................................................... 6 Business of the Company................................................................................................................ 6 Industry Overview .......................................................................................................................... 7 Company History ............................................................................................................................ 9 Business Strengths .......................................................................................................................... 9 Corporate Mission Statement and Strategy ................................................................................... 12 Products and Services ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Transit Bus Axle Weight Issues
    AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSIT BUS AXLE WEIGHT ISSUES Prepared for: American Public Transportation Association Prepared by: MORR Transportation Consulting Ltd. 202-1465 Buffalo Place, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 1L8 November, 2014 The information contained in this report was prepared as part of TCRP Project J-11, Task 20, Transit Cooperative Research Program. SPECIAL NOTE: This report IS NOT an official publication of the Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, or The National Academies. Acknowledgements This study was conducted for the American Public Transportation Association, with funding provided through the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Project J-11, Quick- Response Research on Long-Term Strategic Issues. The TCRP is sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration; directed by the Transit Development Corporation, the education and research arm of the American Public Transportation Association; and administered by The National Academies, through the Transportation Research Board. Project J-11 is intended to fund quick response studies on behalf of the TCRP Oversight and Project Selection (TOPS) Committee, the Federal Transit Administration, and the American Public Transportation Association and its committees. The report was prepared by MORR Transportation Consulting, Ltd. The work was guided by a technical working group, including: Rene Allen, Nova Bus; Joseph Gibson, North American Bus Industries; Jeffrey D. Gonneville, Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority;
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Bus Feasibility Study for the City of Edmonton
    I II ELECTRIC BUS FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE CITY OF EDMONTON JUNE 2016 A REPORT PREPARED BY III IV TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 DESCRIPTION OF MANDATE 1:1 1.2 CONCLUSIONS 1:1 1.3 MAIN FINDINGS 1:4 1.3.1 CUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS OF THE E-BUSES 1:4 1.3.2 ETS AND CITY STAFF PERCEPTIONS OF THE E-BUSES 1:4 1.3.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE FIELD TRIALS 1:5 1.3.4 EXPECTED RELIABILITY OF E-BUSES IN SERVICE 1:6 1.3.5 EXTERNALITIES 1:7 1.3.6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF E-BUSES AT ETS 1:8 1.3.7 THE ELECTRIC BUS TECHNOLOGY AND ITS EVOLUTION 1:9 1.4 THE BUSINESS CASE FOR E-BUSES IN EDMONTON 1:10 1.5 RECOMMENDATIONS 1:13 2 DESCRIPTION OF MANDATE 2.1 OBJECTIVES OF THIS STUDY 2:1 2.2 METHODOLOGY 2:1 2.3 LIMITATIONS OF THIS REPORT 2:2 3 DESCRIPTION OF FIELD TRIALS 3.1 THE ELECTRIC BUSES USED FOR WINTER EVALUATION 3:1 3.2 DURATION AND TIMING OF THE TRIALS 3:4 3.3 DUTY CYCLES OF THE BUSES 3:5 3.4 CLIMATIC CONDITIONS DURING THE TRIALS 3:6 3.5 DATA COLLECTION DURING THE FIELD TRIALS 3:7 3.6 AVAILABILITY OF THE BUSES DURING TRIALS 3:7 3.7 EXTRAORDINARY EVENTS 3:7 3.8 ANALYSIS AND SUMMARY OF TRIALS 3:8 3.8.1 RANGE, STATE OF CHARGE (SOC), ENERGY USAGE (TOTAL TEST AVERAGE) 3:8 3.8.2 TEMPERATURE AND ENERGY USAGE 3:10 3.8.3 ROUTE ANALYSIS 3:13 3.8.4 IMPACT OF SLOPE ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION 3:14 3.8.5 INTERIOR BUS TEMPERATURE ANALYSIS 3:18 3.8.6 OTHER PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS 3:20 3.9 KEY FINDINGS 3:21 4 CUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS OF THE E-BUSES 4.1 METHODOLOGY 4:1 4.2 E-BUS RIDER PERCEPTIONS (AS MEASURED DURING TRIALS) 4:2 4.2.1 BUS MODEL 4:2 4.2.2 NOTICED A DIFFERENT DESIGN
    [Show full text]
  • Business Partners Working Group
    TBARTA Board October 16, 2020 1 All-day modern mobility that provides quick, safe, reliable, frequent, and regional rapid service Purpose 2 TBARTA Board October (today) • Update on stations and vehicles January • Select Recommended Alternative • Discuss coordination with FTA Schedule Look Ahead 3 Vehicle Assessment 4 Las Vegas Express Mettis BRT (Metz, France) Flatiron Flyer (Denver) PSTA Sunrunner BRT Assessment Process Vehicle Look • 9 Vehicle Manufacturers • Length (30’, 35’, 40’) • Traditional vs. Stylized • Articulated (60’) Vehicle Assessment 5 Key Considerations 1) Seating Capacity 2) Vehicle Technology 3) Passenger Comfort 4) Vehicle Cost Vehicle Assessment 6 Seating Capacity • Projected ridership/peak loads • Optimal seating capacity range • Wheelchair & bicycle accommodations Vehicle Assessment 7 Seating Capacity Ridership Estimates • Maximum peak bus load = 40-45 riders • Optimal seating capacity = 35-50 riders Plan for Capacity to Meet Demand Vehicle Assessment 8 Seating Capacity Seating Capacity Summary (up to # of seats) Prevost X3-45 Commuter… 49 58 MCI Commuter Coach 49 57 Van Hool Equi.City 42 61 Nova Bus LFS 41 62 Wright Bus Streetcar RTV 40 40 BYD K11 40 46 Low High Gillig BRT/BRT Plus 39 39 New Flyer Xcelsior 32 61 Proterra ZX5 29 40 Vehicle Assessment 9 Optimal Seating Capacity Seating Capacity Range = 35-50 seats Seating Capacity Summary (up to # of seats) Prevost X3-45 Commuter… 49 58 MCI Commuter Coach 49 57 Van Hool Equi.City 42 61 Nova Bus LFS 41 62 Wright Bus Streetcar RTV 40 40 BYD K11 40 46 Low High Gillig BRT/BRT Plus 39 39 New Flyer Xcelsior 32 61 Proterra ZX5 29 40 Vehicle Assessment 10 Vehicle Technologies Technologies • Propulsion options • Performance considerations 40-45 riders • Emerging technologies Diesel CNG 35-50 riders Hybrid Hydrogen Electric Autonomous Vehicle Assessment 11 Vehicle Technologies Vehicle Fuel Type Trends – All U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Talk Vol
    TRANSIT TALK VOL. 41 Edmonton Launches Battery Bus Service Eleven years after the City of Edmonton scrapped its 140 km electric trolleybus system in a backward move that will live in infamy, electric buses of sorts have returned to its streets. The new vehicles are battery buses, built by American manufacturer Proterra. Although only about half as energy efficient overall as trolleybuses, the vehicles are just as quiet and just as fume-free in the streets, where the noxious fumes from diesel buses have the greatest potential for harm. 21 of the new battery- electric buses debuted in August, with the remainder of an order of 40 vehicles to follow. Built in South Carolina, the buses run off long-range batteries, which are charged overnight using electricity from the grid at overhead charging stations in the garage. Edmonton is one of only a few cities in North America to employ this particular type of charging technology. The buses can travel up to 350 km on a single charge. The vehicles are considered a “long range battery bus”. Transit Branch Manager Eddie Robar explained: “We chose a long-range charge bus because that gives us effectively the same capability we have with our diesel buses today — we can do the same things with our electric bus. We get a full service day from that bus. We’re able to apply it to any route or any location in the city. We’re not restricted by where we need to charge the bus at what time of day. It goes back to the garage, it charges overnight and it’s back out for a full day of service the next day.” The 40-foot Proterra Catalyst E2 MAX vehicle boasts 660 kWh of onboard energy and Proterra’s DuoPower drivetrain.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Bus Rapid Transit a New Mode for High-Quality, High-Capacity Transit Corridors
    Automated Bus Rapid Transit A New Mode for High- Quality, High-Capacity Transit Corridors Richard Mudge, Ph.D. Jerome M. Lutin, Ph.D., PE, AICP, F.ITE October 2020 22601 Gateway Center Drive Clarksburg, MD 20871 Automated Bus Rapid Transit A New Mode for High-Quality, High-Capacity Transit Corridors Prepared for Robotic Research LLC – October 2020 Richard Mudge, Ph.D. President, Compass Transportation and Technologies, Inc. [email protected] Jerome M. Lutin, Ph.D., PE, AICP, F.ITE Senior Director of Statewide and Regional Planning, New Jersey Transit (Retired) [email protected] Executive Summary Elected officials and transit executives today face operating crises due to the unprecedented COVID- 19 pandemic, uncertain future demand, funding shortfalls, and competition from new services and technology. This paper describes a new technology that may help transit leaders address some of these problems as they look toward the future. This paper describes a new approach to high-capacity transit, Automated Bus Rapid Transit (ABRT). ABRT uses state-of-the-art technology to enhance conventional Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). This document provides information for elected officials, transit executives, transit planners, and engineers who seek options to improve transit service while taking advantage of new technology. Automated BRT enhances conventional BRT by leveraging various technologies of automated driving systems (ADS). ADS cover a wide range of capabilities, including: automated collision avoidance and emergency braking to increase safety, automated lane-keeping to allow running on narrow rights of way and sharp turns, automated precision docking, which allows level boarding at platforms to maintain an ADA- compliant gap and reduce damage to buses and platforms, automated smooth acceleration, deceleration, and speed control, and “platooning” which can create an electronically linked train of buses controlled by a single driver in the lead bus.
    [Show full text]
  • New Flyer Industries TSX: NFI and NFI.DB.U
    North America’s #1 Transit Bus Manufacturer and Parts Supplier New Flyer Industries TSX: NFI and NFI.DB.U Forward Looking Statements: May contain forward-looking statements relating to New Flyer Industries Inc. and related companies or to the environment in which they operate, which are based on their operations, estimates, forecasts and projections. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, or are beyond New Flyer’s control. A number of important factors could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. These factors include those set forth in New Flyer’s Annual Information Form which is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. New Flyer assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by applicable securities laws. All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. Non-GAAP Measures: For the definition and explanation of EBITDA, ADJUSTED EBITDA and FREE CASH FLOW please refer to Appendix A. March 20, 2015 2 Executive Summary New Flyer Investment Highlights Leading North . Approximately 48% of heavy-duty delivered buses in 2014 (equivalent units) American Market Share . Approximately 33% aftermarkets parts market share based on 2014 sales Deep Relationships . Established relationships with well over 380 transit authorities who operate approximately 87% of the with High Quality heavy-duty transit buses in the U.S. and Canada in 2014. 24 out of 25 largest transit agencies operate Customer Base New Flyer, NABI or Orion buses Leadership in Product .
    [Show full text]
  • Momentum Update
    Finance & Administration Committee Information Item IV-A October 9, 2014 Momentum Update Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary MEAD Number: Resolution: Action Information 201048 Yes No TITLE: Momentum Progress Report PRESENTATION SUMMARY: Staff will summarize and present progress through FY14 on Momentum, the Authority’s Strategic Plan. PURPOSE: Staff will present information summarizing accomplishments through FY14 towards achieving the goals outlined in Momentum as well update the Board on critical next steps in executing the strategic plan. DESCRIPTION: Key Highlights: z Momentum priority actions have been thoroughly-integrated into the Authority’s business-planning process; z MetroForward initiative is already showing results in terms of more reliable service and better regional productivity z A major milestone in funding Momentum is the $75 million commitment from the jurisdictions to continue rebuilding efforts and lay the foundation for all eight-car trains, and buses for priority corridors; z The community has shown tremendous support for Momentum, providing over 10,000 endorsements from businesses, governments, and individuals; z Over 60 business allies have officially voiced support for Momentum; z Notable accomplishments include achievements in all four of Momentum’s strategic goals; and z Critical next steps include the completed negotiation of a new Capital Funding Agreement which includes monies sufficient to advance the eight-car train program. Background and History: In 2011, Metro undertook a two-year effort to place the Authority on a strategic path to success. Intensive discussions by the Board of Directors, outreach to key stakeholders, and collaboration across the agency resulted in Momentum’s new Vision, Mission, Goals and Priority Actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Zero-Emission Bus Technologies and Existing Conditions for E-Tran
    Overview of Zero-Emission Technologies and Considerations and Existing Conditions Review Elk Grove ZEB Rollout and Implementation Plan Final Report Prepared for the City of Elk Grove Prepared by Stantec October 2020 ZERO-EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGIES AND EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR E-TRAN Zero-Emission Bus Technologies and Existing Conditions for E-tran Overview of Existing Conditions and ZEB Technologies October 13, 2020 Prepared for: The City of Elk Grove Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. ZERO-EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGIES AND EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR E-TRAN Release Version Rev. Description Date 0 Draft Report Issued to Agency 7/10/2020 1 Revised Report Issued to Agency 9/03/2020 2 Final Report Issued to Agency 10/13/2020 This document entitled Zero-Emission Bus Technologies and Existing Conditions for E-tran was prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of the City of Elk Grove (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Advisory Committee May 7, 2019 2:00 P.M. 916 Main Street, 1St Floor Bank Lobby Lubbock, Texas
    Transportation Advisory Committee May 7, 2019 2:00 p.m. 916 Main Street, 1st Floor Bank Lobby Lubbock, Texas 1. Call to Order of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 2. Acknowledgement of Quorum of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 3. Safety Procedures. 4. Public Comment Period/Acknowledgement of Guests of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 5. Approval of the April 2, 2019 meeting minutes of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 6. Discuss and take appropriate action to advance Resolution 2019-08 to the Policy Committee regarding modifications in the National Highway System (NHS) within the Lubbock Metropolitan Planning Area Boundary (MPAB). 7. Discuss and take appropriate action to advance Resolution 2019-09 to the Policy Committee regarding the adoption of Citibus’ amended Transit Asset Management Plan (TAM). 8. Discuss and take appropriate action to recommend a candidate list of projects to the Policy Committee regarding a proposed amendment to the Ten Year Plan through FY 2029. 9. Reports: Cities and County TxDOT Citibus LPD/DPS Texas Tech University Director’s 1 2 AGENDA ITEM 1 Call to Order of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 3 AGENDA ITEM 2 Acknowledgement of the Quorum of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 4 AGENDA ITEM 3 Safety Procedures. Discussion: None Staff Recommendation: Review 5 Safety Procedures Employee or Public Accident In the event that an emergency or serious illness of an employee or visitor while in this meeting: 1. Call 911 2. Call Courthouse security at 775-1547 or 775-1548. a. Provide address b. Type of emergency c. Do not move injured or ill person d. Designate someone to wait for the ambulance at the main Entrance Doors.
    [Show full text]
  • APTA Expo 2011 in New Orleans
    mously selected as the new president and CEO of APTA. While Melaniphy has been involved with the industry for 23 years, it is noteworthy that his last 10 years have been spent in the private sector at MCI. I might mention that outgoing president Bill Millar, who has served APTA for 15 years, very graciously stopped by our booth at the show to greet us. I hesitate to name compass directions in New Orleans because they can be confus - ing. Many of us tend to think of downriver as south and upriver as north but with all of its curves and turns, I suspect that the Mis - sissippi actually flows north past the Con - vention Center. The Expo extended from Hall D to Hall J in a straight line that one floor manager insists was three-quarters of a mile long. IBM graciously provided a fleet of golf carts that shuttled up and down the main hallway providing a local form of pub - lic transportation during the event. An obvious difference between regular bus shows was that the APTA Expo had numerous exhibitors dealing with rail vehi - cles ranging from streetcars to commuter rail and even diesel locomotives. At least four display areas included full or partial rail cars and several booths showed model trains. The most impressive was a full artic - ulated electric rail car built in Switzerland standing on conventional rails bolted to ties sitting on the convention show floor. There were three other rail cars but without wheels. One end of the Expo was heavily popu - lated with rail exhibitors while the other end was predominately bus, including a special APTA Expo 2011 area dedicated to CNG power.
    [Show full text]