DOCSLIB.ORG

Business Partners Working Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Business Partners Working Group TBARTA Board October 16, 2020 1 All-day modern mobility that provides quick, safe, reliable, frequent, and regional rapid service Purpose 2 TBARTA Board October (today) • Update on stations and vehicles January • Select Recommended Alternative • Discuss coordination with FTA Schedule Look Ahead 3 Vehicle Assessment 4 Las Vegas Express Mettis BRT (Metz, France) Flatiron Flyer (Denver) PSTA Sunrunner BRT Assessment Process Vehicle Look • 9 Vehicle Manufacturers • Length (30’, 35’, 40’) • Traditional vs. Stylized • Articulated (60’) Vehicle Assessment 5 Key Considerations 1) Seating Capacity 2) Vehicle Technology 3) Passenger Comfort 4) Vehicle Cost Vehicle Assessment 6 Seating Capacity • Projected ridership/peak loads • Optimal seating capacity range • Wheelchair & bicycle accommodations Vehicle Assessment 7 Seating Capacity Ridership Estimates • Maximum peak bus load = 40-45 riders • Optimal seating capacity = 35-50 riders Plan for Capacity to Meet Demand Vehicle Assessment 8 Seating Capacity Seating Capacity Summary (up to # of seats) Prevost X3-45 Commuter… 49 58 MCI Commuter Coach 49 57 Van Hool Equi.City 42 61 Nova Bus LFS 41 62 Wright Bus Streetcar RTV 40 40 BYD K11 40 46 Low High Gillig BRT/BRT Plus 39 39 New Flyer Xcelsior 32 61 Proterra ZX5 29 40 Vehicle Assessment 9 Optimal Seating Capacity Seating Capacity Range = 35-50 seats Seating Capacity Summary (up to # of seats) Prevost X3-45 Commuter… 49 58 MCI Commuter Coach 49 57 Van Hool Equi.City 42 61 Nova Bus LFS 41 62 Wright Bus Streetcar RTV 40 40 BYD K11 40 46 Low High Gillig BRT/BRT Plus 39 39 New Flyer Xcelsior 32 61 Proterra ZX5 29 40 Vehicle Assessment 10 Vehicle Technologies Technologies • Propulsion options • Performance considerations 40-45 riders • Emerging technologies Diesel CNG 35-50 riders Hybrid Hydrogen Electric Autonomous Vehicle Assessment 11 Vehicle Technologies Vehicle Fuel Type Trends – All U.S. Bus Services (1996-2019) 100% Sample data from APTA Public Transportation 90% Vehicle Database 80% Diesel 70% 60% CNG, LNG, and Blends 50% Hybrid 40% Biodiesel 30% 20% Gasoline 10% Other 0% 2011 1997 1999 1996 1998 2017 2013 2014 2015 2019 2016 2018 2001 2010 2007 2003 2002 2004 2005 2009 2006 2008 2000 Vehicle Assessment 12 Vehicle Technologies Fuel Type – Recent US BRT Fleet Characteristics Estimated Cost City/County, BRT Corridor Fuel/Propulsion Length and Configuration Manufacturer per Vehicle Indianapolis, IndyGo BRT Battery Electric 60 ft, articulated BYD $1,250,000 (2019) Stockton, Metro Express Rt 44 Battery Electric 40 ft Proterra $850,000 (2017) Albuquerque, ART Diesel 60 ft, articulated New Flyer $870,000 (2019) Houston, Post Oak BRT CNG 60 ft, articulated New Flyer $820,000 (2019) Richmond, The Pulse CNG 40 ft, BRT exterior styling Gillig $940,000 (2017) Denver, Flatiron Flyer Diesel 45 ft, coach MCI $594,000 (2015) Cleveland, Healthline Hybrid 60 ft, articulated New Flyer $989,000 (2007) Pinellas County, SunRunner Hybrid 40 ft, BRT exterior styling Gillig $832,000 (2020) Las Vegas, SDX/Express routes Hybrid 62 ft, articulated Wright Bus $1,300,000 (2008) Pau, France; Fébus BRT Hydrogen fuel cell 60 ft, articulated Van Hool $1,500,000 (2019) Vehicle Assessment 13 Vehicle Technologies Vehicle Range by Technology (miles) Diesel-Electric Hybrid 525 Diesel 475 CNG 400 Hydrogen Fuel Cell 200 Battery Electric 175 Vehicle Assessment 14 Vehicle Technologies New & Emerging Vehicle Technologies The future • Automated is electric • Connected • Electric The future is The future is Adaptability is key! automated connected Vehicle Assessment 15 Passenger Comfort Passenger Experience/Comfort • Seating • Noise • Low floor boarding Seating in Commuter Coaches • Wheelchair accommodations • Bicycle accommodations • Other amenities Precision Docking/Low Floor Vehicle Assessment 16 Vehicle Costs $1,500,000 Hydrogen Fuel Cell $1,500,000 $1,300,000 Battery Electric $1,000,000 Diesel-Electric $1,300,000 Hybrid $830,000 $950,000 CNG High Low $800,000 $900,000 Diesel $500,000 Vehicle Assessment 17 Station Site Opportunities 18 Tiered Screening Approach • Data-driven analysis only (3-tier evaluation) Screen One: • Size and land use • Have not spoken to property owners, yet… Screen Two: • Agency Stakeholder comments • Frontage, signal density, natural and • Business Partner comments cultural resources • Public comment Result: Top 3-5 Site Opportunities to carry forward into Environmental Assessment Station Site Selection Process 19 Screen Three – Top Site Opportunities Cost and Feasibility (cost, policy/procedure hurdles, congestion, safety) Equity and Visibility (serves affordable housing and transit dependent, visibility) Community Accessibility (households, jobs within walking, biking distance) Economic Development (redevelopment, TOD potential) Station Site Selection Process 20 Note: Presented here are the results of the data-driven site screening technical analysis only. TBARTA staff has not spoken to property owners. These results do not represent the final selection of a station location as continued design and project development may bring forth SR 54 new recommendations. TBARTA does not plan to pursue eminent domain for this project. Community Preference: Cost & Feasibility Equity and Visibility Community Access Economic Development Suburban Neighborhood Station Site Selection Process 21 Note: Presented here are the results of the data-driven site screening technical analysis only. TBARTA staff has not spoken to property owners. These results do not represent the final selection of a station location as continued design and project development may bring forth SR 54 new recommendations. TBARTA does not plan to pursue eminent domain for this project. 3rd • All sites in neighborhood • Closest to development opportunities – The Grove • Lower relative ROW costs 1st 2nd • Best bike access • Opportunity for vehicle “turn-around” and other RRT facilities • Would require time to travel to site Station Site Selection Process 22 Note: Presented here are the results of the data-driven site screening technical analysis only. TBARTA staff has not spoken to property owners. These results do not represent the final selection of a station location as continued design and project development may bring forth Bearss Ave new recommendations. TBARTA does not plan to pursue eminent domain for this project. Community Preference: Cost & Feasibility Equity and Visibility Community Access Economic Development Urban Mixed Use Neighborhood Station Site Selection Process 23 Note: Presented here are the results of the data-driven site screening technical analysis only. TBARTA staff has not spoken to property owners. These results do not represent the final selection of a station location as continued design and project development may bring forth Bearss Ave new recommendations. TBARTA does not plan to pursue eminent domain for this project. 1st & 2nd Ranked Sites: • Neighborhood sites close to transit dependent households 3rd • Highest population and jobs within walking and biking distance 2nd • Opportunities for economic development • Bearss Ave congestion (LOS E/F) 1st • Privately owned 3rd Ranked Site: • In-line with no ROW costs and easy access • Would require infrastructure investment Station Site Selection Process 24 Note: Presented here are the results of the data-driven site screening technical analysis only. TBARTA staff has not spoken to property owners. These results do not represent the final selection of a station location as continued design and project development may bring forth Waters Ave/Bird St new recommendations. TBARTA does not plan to pursue eminent domain for this project. Community Preference: Cost & Feasibility Equity and Visibility Community Access Economic Development Urban Neighborhood Station Site Selection Process 25 Note: Presented here are the results of the data-driven site screening technical analysis only. TBARTA staff has not spoken to property owners. These results do not represent the final selection of a station location as continued design and project development may bring forth Waters Ave/Bird St new recommendations. TBARTA does not plan to pursue eminent domain for this project. 1st & 2nd Ranked Sites: • In-line with no ROW costs • Access to population and jobs within walking and biking distance • Would require infrastructure investment 3rd & 4th Ranked Sites: • Neighborhood sites connecting to local st 3rd 1 transit • Highest population and jobs within walking and biking distance 4th • Opportunities for economic development 2nd • Privately owned Station Site Selection Process 26 Note: Presented here are the results of the data-driven site screening technical analysis only. TBARTA staff has not spoken to property owners. These results do not represent the final selection of a station location as continued design and project development may bring forth Heights new recommendations. TBARTA does not plan to pursue eminent domain for this project. Community Preference: Cost & Feasibility Equity and Visibility Community Access Economic Development Urban Neighborhood Station Site Selection Process 27 Note: Presented here are the results of the data-driven site screening technical analysis only. TBARTA staff has not spoken to property owners. These results do not represent the final selection of a station location as continued design and project development may bring forth Heights new recommendations. TBARTA does not plan to pursue eminent domain for this project. All Options Come with Challenges • Smaller parcel sizes, access is difficult 1st Ranked Site:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Advanced Technology Equipment Manufacturers*
    Advanced Technology Equipment Manufacturers* Revised 04/21/2020 On-Road (Medium/Heavy Duty, Terminal Tractors) OEM Model Technology Vocations GVWR Type Altec Industries, Inc Altec 12E8 JEMS ePTO ePTO ePTO, Utility > 33,000, 26,001 - 33,000 New Altec Industries, Inc Altec JEMS 1820 and 18E20 ePTO ePTO ePTO, Utility > 33,000, 26,001 - 33,000 New Altec Industries, Inc Altec JEMS 4E4 with 3.6 kWh Battery ePTO ePTO, Utility 16,001-19,500, 19,501-26,000 New Altec Industries, Inc Altec JEMS 6E6 with 3.6 kWh Battery ePTO ePTO, Utility 16,001-19,500, 19,501-26,000 New Autocar Autocar 4x2 and 6x4 Xpeditor with Cummins-Westport ISX12N Engine Near-Zero Engine Truck > 33,001 New Autocar Autocar 4x2 and 6x4 Xpeditor with Cummins-Westport L9N Engine Near-Zero Engine Refuse > 33,001 New Blue Bird Blue Bird Electric Powered All American School Bus Zero Emission Bus, School Bus > 30,000 New Blue Bird Blue Bird Electric Powered Vision School Bus 4x2 Configuration Zero Emission Bus, School Bus > 30,000 New BYD Motors BYD 8Y Electric Yard Tractor Zero Emission Terminal Truck 81,000 New BYD Motors BYD C10 45' All-Electric Coach Bus Zero Emission Bus 49,604 New BYD Motors BYD C10MS 45' All-Electric Double-Decker Coach Bus Zero Emission Transit Bus 45' New BYD Motors BYD C6 23' All-Electric Coach Bus Zero Emission Bus 18,331 New BYD Motors BYD K11 60' Articulated All-Electric Transit Bus Zero Emission Bus 65,036 New BYD Motors BYD K7M 30' All-Electric Transit Bus Zero Emission Bus, Transit Bus 30' New BYD Motors BYD K9 40' All-Electric Transit Bus Zero Emission
    [Show full text]
  • NEW FLYER INDUSTRIES INC. Annual Information Form
    NEW FLYER INDUSTRIES INC. Annual Information Form March 24, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL ................................................................................................................................................... 1 CORPORATE STRUCTURE ..................................................................................................................... 3 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS .................................................................................. 4 Recent Developments ..................................................................................................................... 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS ......................................................................................................... 6 Business of the Company................................................................................................................ 6 Industry Overview .......................................................................................................................... 7 Company History ............................................................................................................................ 9 Business Strengths .......................................................................................................................... 9 Corporate Mission Statement and Strategy ................................................................................... 12 Products and Services ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Transit Bus Axle Weight Issues
    AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSIT BUS AXLE WEIGHT ISSUES Prepared for: American Public Transportation Association Prepared by: MORR Transportation Consulting Ltd. 202-1465 Buffalo Place, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 1L8 November, 2014 The information contained in this report was prepared as part of TCRP Project J-11, Task 20, Transit Cooperative Research Program. SPECIAL NOTE: This report IS NOT an official publication of the Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, or The National Academies. Acknowledgements This study was conducted for the American Public Transportation Association, with funding provided through the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Project J-11, Quick- Response Research on Long-Term Strategic Issues. The TCRP is sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration; directed by the Transit Development Corporation, the education and research arm of the American Public Transportation Association; and administered by The National Academies, through the Transportation Research Board. Project J-11 is intended to fund quick response studies on behalf of the TCRP Oversight and Project Selection (TOPS) Committee, the Federal Transit Administration, and the American Public Transportation Association and its committees. The report was prepared by MORR Transportation Consulting, Ltd. The work was guided by a technical working group, including: Rene Allen, Nova Bus; Joseph Gibson, North American Bus Industries; Jeffrey D. Gonneville, Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority;
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Bus Feasibility Study for the City of Edmonton
    I II ELECTRIC BUS FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE CITY OF EDMONTON JUNE 2016 A REPORT PREPARED BY III IV TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 DESCRIPTION OF MANDATE 1:1 1.2 CONCLUSIONS 1:1 1.3 MAIN FINDINGS 1:4 1.3.1 CUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS OF THE E-BUSES 1:4 1.3.2 ETS AND CITY STAFF PERCEPTIONS OF THE E-BUSES 1:4 1.3.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE FIELD TRIALS 1:5 1.3.4 EXPECTED RELIABILITY OF E-BUSES IN SERVICE 1:6 1.3.5 EXTERNALITIES 1:7 1.3.6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF E-BUSES AT ETS 1:8 1.3.7 THE ELECTRIC BUS TECHNOLOGY AND ITS EVOLUTION 1:9 1.4 THE BUSINESS CASE FOR E-BUSES IN EDMONTON 1:10 1.5 RECOMMENDATIONS 1:13 2 DESCRIPTION OF MANDATE 2.1 OBJECTIVES OF THIS STUDY 2:1 2.2 METHODOLOGY 2:1 2.3 LIMITATIONS OF THIS REPORT 2:2 3 DESCRIPTION OF FIELD TRIALS 3.1 THE ELECTRIC BUSES USED FOR WINTER EVALUATION 3:1 3.2 DURATION AND TIMING OF THE TRIALS 3:4 3.3 DUTY CYCLES OF THE BUSES 3:5 3.4 CLIMATIC CONDITIONS DURING THE TRIALS 3:6 3.5 DATA COLLECTION DURING THE FIELD TRIALS 3:7 3.6 AVAILABILITY OF THE BUSES DURING TRIALS 3:7 3.7 EXTRAORDINARY EVENTS 3:7 3.8 ANALYSIS AND SUMMARY OF TRIALS 3:8 3.8.1 RANGE, STATE OF CHARGE (SOC), ENERGY USAGE (TOTAL TEST AVERAGE) 3:8 3.8.2 TEMPERATURE AND ENERGY USAGE 3:10 3.8.3 ROUTE ANALYSIS 3:13 3.8.4 IMPACT OF SLOPE ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION 3:14 3.8.5 INTERIOR BUS TEMPERATURE ANALYSIS 3:18 3.8.6 OTHER PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS 3:20 3.9 KEY FINDINGS 3:21 4 CUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS OF THE E-BUSES 4.1 METHODOLOGY 4:1 4.2 E-BUS RIDER PERCEPTIONS (AS MEASURED DURING TRIALS) 4:2 4.2.1 BUS MODEL 4:2 4.2.2 NOTICED A DIFFERENT DESIGN
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Talk Vol
    TRANSIT TALK VOL. 41 Edmonton Launches Battery Bus Service Eleven years after the City of Edmonton scrapped its 140 km electric trolleybus system in a backward move that will live in infamy, electric buses of sorts have returned to its streets. The new vehicles are battery buses, built by American manufacturer Proterra. Although only about half as energy efficient overall as trolleybuses, the vehicles are just as quiet and just as fume-free in the streets, where the noxious fumes from diesel buses have the greatest potential for harm. 21 of the new battery- electric buses debuted in August, with the remainder of an order of 40 vehicles to follow. Built in South Carolina, the buses run off long-range batteries, which are charged overnight using electricity from the grid at overhead charging stations in the garage. Edmonton is one of only a few cities in North America to employ this particular type of charging technology. The buses can travel up to 350 km on a single charge. The vehicles are considered a “long range battery bus”. Transit Branch Manager Eddie Robar explained: “We chose a long-range charge bus because that gives us effectively the same capability we have with our diesel buses today — we can do the same things with our electric bus. We get a full service day from that bus. We’re able to apply it to any route or any location in the city. We’re not restricted by where we need to charge the bus at what time of day. It goes back to the garage, it charges overnight and it’s back out for a full day of service the next day.” The 40-foot Proterra Catalyst E2 MAX vehicle boasts 660 kWh of onboard energy and Proterra’s DuoPower drivetrain.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Bus Rapid Transit a New Mode for High-Quality, High-Capacity Transit Corridors
    Automated Bus Rapid Transit A New Mode for High- Quality, High-Capacity Transit Corridors Richard Mudge, Ph.D. Jerome M. Lutin, Ph.D., PE, AICP, F.ITE October 2020 22601 Gateway Center Drive Clarksburg, MD 20871 Automated Bus Rapid Transit A New Mode for High-Quality, High-Capacity Transit Corridors Prepared for Robotic Research LLC – October 2020 Richard Mudge, Ph.D. President, Compass Transportation and Technologies, Inc. [email protected] Jerome M. Lutin, Ph.D., PE, AICP, F.ITE Senior Director of Statewide and Regional Planning, New Jersey Transit (Retired) [email protected] Executive Summary Elected officials and transit executives today face operating crises due to the unprecedented COVID- 19 pandemic, uncertain future demand, funding shortfalls, and competition from new services and technology. This paper describes a new technology that may help transit leaders address some of these problems as they look toward the future. This paper describes a new approach to high-capacity transit, Automated Bus Rapid Transit (ABRT). ABRT uses state-of-the-art technology to enhance conventional Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). This document provides information for elected officials, transit executives, transit planners, and engineers who seek options to improve transit service while taking advantage of new technology. Automated BRT enhances conventional BRT by leveraging various technologies of automated driving systems (ADS). ADS cover a wide range of capabilities, including: automated collision avoidance and emergency braking to increase safety, automated lane-keeping to allow running on narrow rights of way and sharp turns, automated precision docking, which allows level boarding at platforms to maintain an ADA- compliant gap and reduce damage to buses and platforms, automated smooth acceleration, deceleration, and speed control, and “platooning” which can create an electronically linked train of buses controlled by a single driver in the lead bus.
    [Show full text]
  • Momentum Update
    Finance & Administration Committee Information Item IV-A October 9, 2014 Momentum Update Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary MEAD Number: Resolution: Action Information 201048 Yes No TITLE: Momentum Progress Report PRESENTATION SUMMARY: Staff will summarize and present progress through FY14 on Momentum, the Authority’s Strategic Plan. PURPOSE: Staff will present information summarizing accomplishments through FY14 towards achieving the goals outlined in Momentum as well update the Board on critical next steps in executing the strategic plan. DESCRIPTION: Key Highlights: z Momentum priority actions have been thoroughly-integrated into the Authority’s business-planning process; z MetroForward initiative is already showing results in terms of more reliable service and better regional productivity z A major milestone in funding Momentum is the $75 million commitment from the jurisdictions to continue rebuilding efforts and lay the foundation for all eight-car trains, and buses for priority corridors; z The community has shown tremendous support for Momentum, providing over 10,000 endorsements from businesses, governments, and individuals; z Over 60 business allies have officially voiced support for Momentum; z Notable accomplishments include achievements in all four of Momentum’s strategic goals; and z Critical next steps include the completed negotiation of a new Capital Funding Agreement which includes monies sufficient to advance the eight-car train program. Background and History: In 2011, Metro undertook a two-year effort to place the Authority on a strategic path to success. Intensive discussions by the Board of Directors, outreach to key stakeholders, and collaboration across the agency resulted in Momentum’s new Vision, Mission, Goals and Priority Actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Zero-Emission Bus Technologies and Existing Conditions for E-Tran
    Overview of Zero-Emission Technologies and Considerations and Existing Conditions Review Elk Grove ZEB Rollout and Implementation Plan Final Report Prepared for the City of Elk Grove Prepared by Stantec October 2020 ZERO-EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGIES AND EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR E-TRAN Zero-Emission Bus Technologies and Existing Conditions for E-tran Overview of Existing Conditions and ZEB Technologies October 13, 2020 Prepared for: The City of Elk Grove Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. ZERO-EMISSION BUS TECHNOLOGIES AND EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR E-TRAN Release Version Rev. Description Date 0 Draft Report Issued to Agency 7/10/2020 1 Revised Report Issued to Agency 9/03/2020 2 Final Report Issued to Agency 10/13/2020 This document entitled Zero-Emission Bus Technologies and Existing Conditions for E-tran was prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of the City of Elk Grove (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Advisory Committee May 7, 2019 2:00 P.M. 916 Main Street, 1St Floor Bank Lobby Lubbock, Texas
    Transportation Advisory Committee May 7, 2019 2:00 p.m. 916 Main Street, 1st Floor Bank Lobby Lubbock, Texas 1. Call to Order of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 2. Acknowledgement of Quorum of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 3. Safety Procedures. 4. Public Comment Period/Acknowledgement of Guests of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 5. Approval of the April 2, 2019 meeting minutes of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 6. Discuss and take appropriate action to advance Resolution 2019-08 to the Policy Committee regarding modifications in the National Highway System (NHS) within the Lubbock Metropolitan Planning Area Boundary (MPAB). 7. Discuss and take appropriate action to advance Resolution 2019-09 to the Policy Committee regarding the adoption of Citibus’ amended Transit Asset Management Plan (TAM). 8. Discuss and take appropriate action to recommend a candidate list of projects to the Policy Committee regarding a proposed amendment to the Ten Year Plan through FY 2029. 9. Reports: Cities and County TxDOT Citibus LPD/DPS Texas Tech University Director’s 1 2 AGENDA ITEM 1 Call to Order of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 3 AGENDA ITEM 2 Acknowledgement of the Quorum of the Transportation Advisory Committee. 4 AGENDA ITEM 3 Safety Procedures. Discussion: None Staff Recommendation: Review 5 Safety Procedures Employee or Public Accident In the event that an emergency or serious illness of an employee or visitor while in this meeting: 1. Call 911 2. Call Courthouse security at 775-1547 or 775-1548. a. Provide address b. Type of emergency c. Do not move injured or ill person d. Designate someone to wait for the ambulance at the main Entrance Doors.
    [Show full text]
  • Foothill Transit Battery Electric Bus Evaluation: Final Report
    Foothill Transit Battery Electric Bus Evaluation: Final Report Matthew Jeffers and Leslie Eudy National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-80022 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC June 2021 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Foothill Transit Battery Electric Bus Evaluation: Final Report Matthew Jeffers and Leslie Eudy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Suggested Citation Jeffers, Matthew and Leslie Eudy. 2021. Foothill Transit Battery Electric Bus Evaluation: Final Report. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5400- 80022. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/80022.pdf. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-80022 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC June 2021 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by the California Air Resources Board. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDICES Everett-Boston
    Everett-Boston BRT APPENDICES APPENDIX A THE STATE OF TRANSIT IN EVERETT: EXISTING CONDITIONS AND FUTURE NEEDS 2 HISTORY OF TRANSIT IN EVERETT Boston’s transit system was originally designed with a series of surface– rapid transit transfer stations. Horsecars and then streetcars wound through narrow downtown streets, but the roads were quickly overcome by congestion, so the city built the first subway in the nation in 1897. However, this subway—now the Green Line—was relatively low-capacity, with a parade of short trolley cars running through narrow passages. As higher- capacity rapid transit lines were built, passengers would board surface vehicles (mostly trolleys) that fed into higher-capacity rapid transit lines at major transfer stations to continue trips downtown. Even as the network has changed, this general function has remained to this day. In the case of Everett, bus routes only serve the bordering towns of Medford, Malden, Revere, and Chelsea; nearly all other destinations require a transfer. For most trips, the transfer point is at Sullivan station, but buses also provide connections to the Orange Line at Wellington and Malden, as well as the Blue Line at Wood Island and Wonderland. This has not always been the case: Before the Orange Line was extended to Oak Grove in the 1970s, the line terminated in Everett, south of Revere Beach Parkway and the main population of the city. When the extension was opened, the routes serving Everett had their termini moved, with some extended from the old Everett station to Sullivan and others rerouted to Malden and Wellington stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Cell Electric Bus Technology: Technical Capabilities & Experience
    Fuel Cell Electric Bus Technology: Technical Capabilities & Experience (Co-Hosted by California Hydrogen Business Council) June 13, 2019 California Transit Association • Represents more than 200 transit- affiliated entities, including more than 80 transit agencies in CA • Advocates for policies and funding solutions that support and advance public transit Involvement in Innovative Clean Transit Regulation • Led negotiation with ARB on behalf of the transit industry • Focused our advocacy efforts on the following provisions: – Benchmarking & Regulatory Assessment – ZEB Purchase Mandate Schedule – Waiver for Early Compliance – Definition of Small vs. Large Agencies – Access to Incentive Funding – Excluded Buses Support for ICT Regulation Implementation Outreach/ Advocacy Education Compliance 4 How to Ask Questions • Submit your questions anytime during the program using the Questions module in your webinar control panel at the right of your screen. • We will collect all questions and get to as many as time permits during the Q&A portion of the program. Emanuel Wagner Deputy Director California Hydrogen Business Council Mission & Sector Action Groups: The California Hydrogen Business Council (CHBC) is comprised of over 100 companies and agencies involved in the business of hydrogen. Our mission is to advance the commercialization of hydrogen in the energy sector, including transportation, goods movement, and stationary power systems to reduce emissions and dependence on oil in California. CHBC Activities: – Advocacy & Initiatives • Renewable
    [Show full text]