Hi Good Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A. L. Kroeber Papers, 1869-1972
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf3d5n99tn No online items Guide to the A. L. Kroeber Papers, 1869-1972 Processed by Xiuzhi Zhou Jane Bassett Lauren Lassleben Claora Styron; machine-readable finding aid created by James Lake The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu © 1998 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Note History --History, University of California --History, UC BerkeleyGeographical (by Place) --University of California --University of California BerkeleySocial Sciences --AnthropologySocial Sciences --Area and Interdisciplinary Studies --Native American Studies Guide to the A. L. Kroeber BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 1 Papers, 1869-1972 Guide to the A. L. Kroeber Papers, 1869-1972 Collection number: BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Processed by: Xiuzhi Zhou Jane Bassett Lauren Lassleben Claora Styron Date Completed: 1997 Encoded by: James Lake © 1998 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: A. L. Kroeber Papers, Date (inclusive): 1869-1972 Collection Number: BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 Creator: Kroeber, A. L. (Alfred Louis), 1876-1960 Extent: Originals: 40 boxes, 21 cartons, 14 volumes, 9 oversize folders (circa 45 linear feet)Copies: 187 microfilm reels: negative (Rich. -
Clifford-Ishi's Story
ISHI’S STORY From: James Clifford, Returns: Becoming Indigenous in the 21st Century. (Harvard University Press 2013, pp. 91-191) Pre-publication version. [Frontispiece: Drawing by L. Frank, used courtesy of the artist. A self-described “decolonizationist” L. Frank traces her ancestry to the Ajachmem/Tongva tribes of Southern California. She is active in organizations dedicated to the preservation and renewal of California’s indigenous cultures. Her paintings and drawings have been exhibited world wide and her coyote drawings from News from Native California are collected in Acorn Soup, published in 1998 by Heyday Press. Like coyote, L. Frank sometimes writes backwards.] 2 Chapter 4 Ishi’s Story "Ishi's Story" could mean “the story of Ishi,” recounted by a historian or some other authority who gathers together what is known with the goal of forming a coherent, definitive picture. No such perspective is available to us, however. The story is unfinished and proliferating. My title could also mean “Ishi's own story,” told by Ishi, or on his behalf, a narration giving access to his feelings, his experience, his judgments. But we have only suggestive fragments and enormous gaps: a silence that calls forth more versions, images, endings. “Ishi’s story,” tragic and redemptive, has been told and re-told, by different people with different stakes in the telling. These interpretations in changing times are the materials for my discussion. I. Terror and Healing On August 29th, 1911, a "wild man,” so the story goes, stumbled into civilization. He was cornered by dogs at a slaughterhouse on the outskirts of Oroville, a small town in Northern California. -
Ishi and Anthropological Indifference in the Last of His Tribe
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 11; June 2013 "I Heard Your Singing": Ishi and Anthropological Indifference in the Last of His Tribe Jay Hansford C. Vest, Ph.D. Enrolled member Monacan Indian Nation Direct descendent Opechanchanough (Pamunkey) Honorary Pikuni (Blackfeet) in Ceremonial Adoption (June 1989) Professor of American Indian Studies University of North Carolina at Pembroke One University Drive (P. O. Box 1510) Pembroke, NC 28372-1510 USA. The moving and poignant story of Ishi, the last Yahi Indian, has manifested itself in the film drama The Last of His Tribe (HBO Pictures/Sundance Institute, 1992). Given the long history of Hollywood's misrepresentation of Native Americans, I propose to examine this cinematic drama attending historical, ideological and cultural axioms acknowledged in the film and concomitant literature. Particular attention is given to dramatic allegorical themes manifesting historical racism, Western societal conquest, and most profoundly anthropological indifference, as well as, the historical accuracy and the ideological differences of worldview -- Western vis-à-vis Yahi -- manifest in the film. In the study of worldviews and concomitant values, there has long existed a lurking "we" - "they" proposition of otherness. Ever since the days of Plato and his Western intellectual predecessors, there has been an attempt to locate and explicate wisdom in the ethnocentric ideological notion of the "civilized" vis-à-vis the "savage." Consequently, Plato's thoughts are accorded the standing of philosophy -- the love of wisdom -- while Black Elk's words are the musings of the "primitive" and consigned to anthropology -- the science of man. Philosophy is, thusly, seen as an endeavor of "civilized" Western man whom in his "science of man" or anthropological investigation may record the "ethnometaphysics" of "primitive" or "developing" cultures. -
1. Introduction
1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Ethnographic setting The Chimariko language was spoken in the nineteenth century in a few small villages in Trinity County, in north-western California. The villages were located along a twenty-mile stretch of the Trinity River and parts of the New River and South Fork River. In 1849, the Chimariko numbered around two hundred and fifty people. They were nearly extinct in 1906, except for a ‘toothless old woman and a crazy old man’, as well as ‘a few mixed bloods’ (Kroeber 1925:109). The ‘toothless old woman’ Kroeber refers to was most likely Polly Dyer and the ‘crazy old man’ Dr. Tom, also identified by Dixon (1910:295) as a ‘half-crazy old man’. The last speaker probably died in the 1940s. First contact with European explorers occurred early in the nineteenth century, in the 1820s or 1830s, when fur trappers came to the region. However, the tribe was left largely unaffected by this encounter (Dixon 1910:297). During the Gold Rush in the 1850s the Chimariko territory was overrun by gold seekers. Continuous gold mining activities in the region threatened the salmon supply, the main food source of the tribe, and led to a bitter conflict in the 1860s (Silver 1978a:205). The fights between European miners and the tribe resulted in the near annihilation of the Chimariko in the 1860s. The few survivors took refuge with the neighboring Shasta on the upper Salmon River or in Scott Valley or with the Hupa to the northwest (Dixon 1910:297). Once the gold was gone and the miners left the region, the survivors returned to their homes after years in exile (Silver 1978a:205). -
Ishi, the Last Wild Indian, 2001 Peabody Essex Museum David P
Ishi, the Last Wild Indian, 2001 Peabody Essex Museum David P. Bradley, White Earth Ojibwe (1954 - ) Salem in History, 2006 Ishi, the Last Wild Indian, 2001 David P. Bradley, White Earth Ojibwe (1954 - ) Santa Fe, N.M. Mixed Media on Board Gift of Mr. & Mrs. James N. Krebs, 2001 E301825 H I S T O R I C A L C O N T E X T Ishi (c.1860-1916) was the last living member of the Yahi tribe, the southernmost tribe of the Yana people who inhabited northern California and the Sacramento Valley.The California gold rush and influx of foreign- ers contributed to the quick demise of the Yana tribes through conflict and disease. Apparently the last surviving Yahi, Ishi journeyed into white society, and was brought to the Museum of Anthropology in San Francisco by anthropologist Alfred Lewis Kroeber. He worked as both a janitor and as a “living exhibit,” making arrowheads in front of paying museum visitors and helping researchers record the Yana language.This survivor did not divulge information about his deceased family, however, and he did not even reveal his own name. “Ishi” means “man” in Yana. The mysterious person known as Ishi did in 1916, a victim of tuberculosis, which was foreign to the Yahi. Rumors spread that Ishi’s brain had been preserved after his death, but it wasn’t until 1999 that his pickled brain was found in a Smithsonian museum warehouse.This prompted much controversy and political debate.The Smithsonian agreed to return Ishi’s brain to surviving Native American tribes closely related to the Yahi, and it was buried with Ishi’s body in 2000. -
The Return of Ishi's Brain: After an Unsettling Discovery, Anthropologists Reconsider a Legendary Friendship by Christopher Shea Lingua Franca February 2000
The Return of Ishi's Brain: After an Unsettling Discovery, Anthropologists Reconsider a Legendary Friendship By Christopher Shea Lingua Franca February 2000 IN CALIFORNIA, EVERY SCHOOLCHILD learns the story of Ishi, the last Yahi Indian. On August 29, 1911, he stumbled out of the woods in Oroville, California, 180 miles northeast of San Francisco, his hair singed black in a display of mourning. It was a shocking event: Native Americans, it was thought, had long since been driven onto reservations or onto the margins of white settlements. According to the best-known version of the Ishi story, barking dogs awakened workers at an Oroville slaughterhouse early in the morning. The butchers found a man cowering, near starvation, beside a corral leading into the building. They called the local sheriff, who handcuffed the Indian and brought him to the town jail for safekeeping. As word spread about Oroville's new resident, Northern Californians streamed into town to gawk at "the last wild Indian in North America." The Oroville officials contacted the University of California, which dispatched an anthropologist, T.T. Waterman, to the scene. He pronounced Ishi a "Stone Age man"—a sobriquet that stuck to him for life—and took him back to San Francisco by train. Waterman and his fellow anthropologists housed Ishi in a room in the university's museum and set about learning as much of his story as they could. He remained in the museum, working as a janitor and putting on the occasional flint- making show—sometimes for crowds of hundreds—until 1916, when he succumbed to tuberculosis. -
Wintu Boundary Poster
Clarification of the California Wintu Northern Boundary Various views: 1877-2007 Alfred L. Kroeber's map Drawing lines on the map of California to divide Indian tribal territory relied heavily on interpretation. Based on the theoretical background of the scholar – linguistics, ethnography, archaeology, or ecology – the boundaries won’t be the same and the results may be subject to lively debate. Interestingly, the research, descriptions, and debates were by and among the scholars. The Indian C. Hart Merriam’s map: 1955 Mt. Shasta tribes being studied, to the extent they did still exist, may have been consulted for reference, but were not generally consulted as 14163 expert authorities. C. Hart Merriam’s unaltered description of the boundaries of the Wintu, "Tribes of Wintoon #0 "From Mt. Shasta the northern boundary passes Shas'-te a little north of Black Fox Mountain." p. 3 Stock," was published in Studies of California Indians (1955). Boundary features on this Alfred L. Kroeber (1876 – 1960) and C. Hart Merriam (1855 – 1942) were professional contemporaries. Both devoted much of their McTavish drew two straight lines to go map are based on GIS layers of hydrologic drainage areas, rivers, streams, mountains, around Black Fox Mountain. careers to studying Indian issues. Kroeber’s Handbook of the Indians of California was first published in 1925; he introduced it as “the and cultural features that were described by Merriam. Differing from cartographic Mo'dok Salmon Ri outcome of 17 years of acquaintance and occupation with the Indians of California.” The data came primarily from ethnographers v S er S convention, the colors were varied in order to differentiate thae segments referred to by c Black Butte o lm variously affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History, University of California, and Bureau of American Ethnology of the t Merriam, and his text is quoted to explain the location. -
Documents Relating to the Unnaming of Kroeber Hall
Documents relating to the unnaming of Kroeber Hall compiled by Andrew Garrett, May 2021 This is a collection of five documents created at the University of California, Berkeley in rela- tion to the unnaming of Kroeber Hall. The unnaming was proposed in 2020 and approved in 2021. In this collection are the following: 1. Pages 2-8: Proposal to Un-Name Kroeber Hall, author(s) anonymous, together with a letter of introduction and endorsment by Paul Alivisatos, Sabrina Agarwal, et al., July 1, 2020 2. Pages 9-42: Public comments (“received as of September 2, 2020”) on the Proposal to Un-Name Kroeber Hall 3. Pages 43-49: Recommendation from Building Name Review Committee to Chancellor Carol T. Christ, October 30, 2020 4. Pages 50-52: Recommendation from Chancellor Christ to President Michael Drake, November 30, 2020 5. Pages 53-54: Campus memorandum from Chancellor Christ, January 26, 2021 Documents 1-3 are from https://chancellor.berkeley.edu/task-forces/building-name-review- committee/building-name-review-kroeber-hall (accessed January 27, 2021). Document 4 was provided by the Office of the Chancellor (email, April 5, 2021). Document 5 was sent by email to the UC Berkeley campus community. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY BERKELEY • DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • MERCED • RIVERSIDE • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA • SANTA CRUZ July 1, 2020 UC Berkeley Building Name Review Committee transmitted via electronic mail to [email protected] We, the undersigned, endorse the conclusions of the July 1, 2020 Proposal to Un-name Kroeber Hall. Alfred Kroeber is not an appropriate symbol for the University of California, Berkeley or any welcoming campus. -
Yurok and the Klamath River
Yurok and the Klamath River: Yurok Historical Context and Data for Assessing Current Conditions and the Effects of the proposed Klamath Restoration Project on Yurok Tribal Trust Assets and Yurok Resources of Cultural and Religious Significance Report Prepared for the Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs For Use in the Secretarial Determination Overview Report and NEPA/CEQA Analysis Under Grant # 81333AG053 from US Fish and Wildlife Service Prepared by: Dr. Kathleen Sloan Yurok Tribe Environmental Program February 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction: Purpose of Report 3 II. Yurok Tribe: Overview of Yurok History 7 III. Yurok Traditional Knowledge and the Klamath River 25 IV. Yurok Resources of Cultural and Religious Significance 43 V. Yurok Fishing Sites and Fishing Rights 47 VI. Yurok Beneficial Uses of the Klamath River and Tributaries 56 VII. Environmental Justice 70 VIII. Tribal Trust and Potentially Impacted Trust Assets 110 IX. Conclusions and Recommendations 120 X. References Cited 125 XI. Attachments 130 A. 1851 Treaty with the Poh-lik-lah B. 1973 USC 412 US 481 Mattz v. Arnett C. 1993 DOI Solicitors Opinion: Fishing Rights of the Yurok and Hoopa Valley Tribes D. 2006 DOI Cooperative Agreement: Cooperative Management of Tribal and Federal Lands and Resources in the Klamath River Basin in California 2 I. Introduction: Purpose of Report This report has been prepared under contract with the US Fish and Wildlife Service for the purpose of providing information to the Department of the Interior (DOI), the Secretary of the Interior, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and all federal agencies involved in the Secretarial Determination and compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Policy Act (CEQA) currently underway for the purposes of evaluating the proposed action of removing four Klamath River dams and implementing provisions set forth in the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement (KBRA) and the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement (KHSA). -
KLAMATH /\MATII INI)IANJRE,Setht Y C: Et I
ranlinr - 4. Ii.(fI4O1 cl r9\ 5s C ' ETHNOGRAPHIC s'..L- tcH p' )T\' r SKETCH :sci41J OF THE f: Pr5T1 -11E1 L 1 ttc!f\\ \AKLAMATH /\MATII INI)IANJRE,SEThT y C: Et I. L/"° kt, INDIANS ckt1IPK / 41(chat,rc F % A" .. OF SOUTHWESTERN OREGON N 'I S j bli C' ''U OX] by ALBERT SAMUELGATSCHET 4 I'VYA - I) S. C Cm DIP. TIMPEN '4?. .1 4f.thrth' DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. 8. GEOGRAPHICAL AND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION J. W. POWELL IN CHARGE Ethnographic Sketch of THE KLAMATH I.XDIAKS op SOUTHWESTERN OREGON ALBERT SAMUEL GATSCHET An Extract from CONTRIBUTIONS TO NORTH AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY, Vol.II, part I. WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1890 FACSIMILE REPRODUCTION 1966 THE SHOREY BOOK STORE 815 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 SJS # 118 ETHNOGRAPHIC SKETCH OF THE KALAMATH INDIANS FOURTH PRINTING Of Facsimile Reprint Limited to 150 Copies November 1973 ISBN # 0-8466-0118-4 (InPaper Covers) ISBN # 0-8466-2118-5 (InPublisher's LibraryBindings) CONTENTS Page Letter of Transmittal Vii Ethnographic sketch ix Introduction to the texts 1 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. SMiTHSONIAN INSTITUTION, BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY, Washington, D. C., June 25, 1890. SIR: I have the honor to transmit toyou my report upon the Kiamath Indians of Southwestern Oregon, the result of long and patient study.It deals with their beliefs, legends, and traditions, theirgovernment and social life, their racial and somatic peculiarities, and,more extensively, with their language.To this the reader is introduced bynumerous ethnographic "Texts," suggested or dictated -
Acknowledgments
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For me there are several layers of “thanks with appreciation” about my learning and re- thinking the Ishi saga over time. A wide swath of territory in northern California was involved. Help I received in researching several subject areas must be addressed. There was the preliminary scholarship of Ishi’s life-story profled shortly after Ishi’s contact years (1911-1916). This layer of gratitude I extend to Thomas T. Waterman (1918b) Alfred L. Kroeber (1925) and Saxton T. Pope Sr.. (1920). Contributor in 1915 was linguist Edward Sapir who “captured his readiest language, the southernmost Yana language, christened the Yahi language. There was afterwards a hiatus of almost ffty years when Ishi, the man, was almost forgot- ten, save for Pope’s 1925 Hunting with the Bow and Arrow. In 1949, some readers heard anew about Ishi from W. H. Hutchinson’s “Ishi – The Unconquered” published in Natural History, Vol. 58. Theodora Kroeber made Ishi famous for a second time by writing. in 1961, Ishi In Two Worlds (University of California Press) and by publishing in the Book Section of the Reader’s Digest (December 1961) her condensed version of her book. I credit Theodora Kroeber for inspiring me about Ishi. That traditional California Indians could successfully “call in” to them the animals from the forest foor intrigued me. If they knew that much about the animal world, what more did they know about the Land? Promoting the Ishi story were Robert Heizer and Albert Elsasser. I acknowledge both of them for collecting, reviewing, and publishing data about Ishi that I have used. -
The Life of Stephen Powers by Susan Park
PART I The Life of Stephen Powers by Susan Park - iii - 1 Introduction Stephen Powers provided anthropology the first systematic ethnological material on the California Indians. The contribution he made in his Tribes of California is invaluable to the student of these cultures. Although Powers wrote proudly of his pioneer forebearers, he was himself also something of a pioneer. The body of literature about the Indians which existed at the time of his travels in California (1871-1875) consisted largely of haphazard observations of the early explorers, hunters and trappers, civil and military authorities -- Spanish and American -- various missionary groups, early emigrants and settlers, and "travelers.'" These writings cannot be entirely discredited since they portray cultures which at that time had had little contact with the western world and hence were not much affected by it, and as such they are of definite value. However, in these writings it is often difficult to ascertain precisely which tribe and in what location the group being described referred to. Often, for example, the various tribes were referred to collectively as "Diggers. " Further confusion stemmed from descriptions of geographical locations. It was common for a writer to speak of a group's being situated so many miles distant from his last camping place. In the case of navi- gating explorers localities were often defined in terms of longitude and latitude, Many of these calculations have subsequently proved incorrect. To this chaos, Powers brought order, at least for the northern two-thirds of the State. Armed with the Smithsonian alphabet for transcribing languages, "a wild sense of adventure", and great perceptiveness, Powers "traveled many thousands of miles on foot and on horseback" among the California Indians.