DOCSLIB.ORG

A. L. Kroeber Papers, 1869-1972

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf3d5n99tn No online items Guide to the A. L. Kroeber Papers, 1869-1972 Processed by Xiuzhi Zhou Jane Bassett Lauren Lassleben Claora Styron; machine-readable finding aid created by James Lake The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu © 1998 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Note History --History, University of California --History, UC BerkeleyGeographical (by Place) --University of California --University of California BerkeleySocial Sciences --AnthropologySocial Sciences --Area and Interdisciplinary Studies --Native American Studies Guide to the A. L. Kroeber BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 1 Papers, 1869-1972 Guide to the A. L. Kroeber Papers, 1869-1972 Collection number: BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Processed by: Xiuzhi Zhou Jane Bassett Lauren Lassleben Claora Styron Date Completed: 1997 Encoded by: James Lake © 1998 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: A. L. Kroeber Papers, Date (inclusive): 1869-1972 Collection Number: BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 Creator: Kroeber, A. L. (Alfred Louis), 1876-1960 Extent: Originals: 40 boxes, 21 cartons, 14 volumes, 9 oversize folders (circa 45 linear feet)Copies: 187 microfilm reels: negative (Rich. 1840) and positive (BANC FILM 2049 and BANC FILM 3431) Repository: The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California 94720-6000 Physical Location: For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. Abstract: Kroeber conducted field work with several Klamath River groups, including the Karok, Wiyot, and Yurok Indians; the Yokuts Indians of Central California; with Ishi, the last member of the Yahi band of the Sacramento Valley; the Mohave Guide to the A. L. Kroeber BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 2 Papers, 1869-1972 Indians of the Colorado River region; and the Zuni Indians of New Mexico, among many other groups. He also carried out archaeological field work in Mexico and Peru. He published more that 500 books and articles on anthropological topics, and served as an expert witness in the Indian land claims cases Clyde F. Thompson et. al. v. United States, Docket No. 31, and Ernest Risling et. al. v. United States, Docket 37. Languages Represented: English Access RESTRICTED ORIGINALS. USE MICROFILM COPY ONLY WITH CALL NO. BANC FILM 2049. Use of originals only by permission of the Curator of the History of Science and Technology Collection. Publication Rights Copyright has not been assigned to The Bancroft Library. All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Head of Public Services. Permission for publication is given on behalf of The Bancroft Library as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained by the reader. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], A. L. Kroeber papers, BANC FILM 2049, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. Title: Samuel A. Barrett Papers, Identifier/Call Number: BANC MSS 86/172 c Title: Theodora Kroeber Papers, Identifier/Call Number: BANC MSS 80/44 c Title: Robert Fleming Heizer Papers, Identifier/Call Number: BANC FILM 2106, Series 3, Indian Land Claims Title: Records of the Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, Identifier/Call Number: CU-23 Title: Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, Identifier/Call Number: CU-23.1 Title: Indian Stocks and Tribes of...California, Identifier/Call Number: G4361.E1 1939.T34 Case XD Title: Robert Fleming Heizer [Collection of miscellaneous maps], Identifier/Call Number: G9990.H4 Selected printed materials have been removed from the collection. Photographs have been transferred to the Pictorial Collections of The Bancroft Library (BANC PIC 1971.001, BANC PIC 1978.169--PIC, and BANC PIC 1978.128--PIC). Selected maps have been transferred to the Map Collection of The Bancroft Library. Philip S. Sparkman's writings on Luiseño grammar have been transferred to the Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, CU-23.1. Thomas T. Waterman's Yurok and Diegueño field notebooks have been transferred to the Ethnological Documents of the Department and Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, CU-23.1. Acquisition Information The A. L. Kroeber Papers were given to The Bancroft Library by Theodora Kroeber and Robert F. Heizer, and were originally cataloged as BANC MSS C-B 925. The current collection, also cataloged as BANC MSS C-B 925, is a consolidation of the following collections: BANC MSS 71/83 c BANC MSS 78/22 c BANC MSS 83/109 c BANC MSS 88/45 c Funding The archival processing and microfilming of the A. L. Kroeber Papers have been made possible by a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, Title II-C, Strengthening Research Library Resources Program. The project was jointly carried out by the Library Conservation Department of the University of California, Berkeley, and The Bancroft Library. Guide to the A. L. Kroeber BANC FILM 2049 BANC MSS C-B 925 3 Papers, 1869-1972 Acknowledgments It would not have been possible to complete the archival processing and microfilming of the A.L. Kroeber Papers without the generous assistance of various colleagues at BMI Imaging Systems, in Sunnyvale, California, and the University of California, Berkeley. Bay Microfilm, Inc. staff members Meg Cudal, Jan Hawley, Muoi Huynh, Dennis Jefferson, Robert Piercy, and Dody Van Dyke did an outstanding job with every aspect of an exceedingly challenging microfilming project. Our colleagues in the U.C. Berkeley Library Conservation Department, including Nancy Harris, Lynn Jones, Barclay Ogden, Cameron Olen, Wendy Partridge, and Ann Swartzell, obtained the grant funding, handled the accounting, and performed the necessary preservation treatments with skill and dispatch. William Roberts, University Archivist, gave us the benefit of his expert curatorial judgment. We had exceptional help from our dedicated and willing student assistants, Erica Boyd, Susana Franco, Janet Lee, Brian C. Pierini, and Sierra Van Borst. Beverly Ortiz, California Indian expert and doctoral student in the U.C. Berkeley Anthropology Department, and long-time staff editor for the Anthropology Department, Grace Buzaljko, each aided us immeasurably with anthropological terminology and the identification of correspondents. Joan Berman, Native American Studies bibliographer at Humboldt State University, Sherrie Smith-Ferri, curator at the Grace Hudson Museum, and F. Alex Long helped a great deal by providing information on when and where Kroeber conducted his field work, and by critiquing earlier drafts of this finding aid. We are also most grateful for the interest and support of Dr. Karl Kroeber, Professor of English at Columbia University. Dr. Leanne Hinton of the Linguistics Department made extraordinary efforts to successfully locate and donate eight additional Kroeber field notebooks to The Bancroft Library. Note on Microfilm The A. L. Kroeber Papers have been microfilmed in order to preserve the original manuscripts and to make the wealth of information contained in them more readily available to researchers. Great care has been taken in the filming of these papers to ensure that the microfilm is an accurate and complete copy of the originals. There are instances, however, when the originals are not legible or are incomplete or contain anomalies, and these defects are reflected in the microfilm. Because the microfilm must be black and white in order to satisfy archival standards, colors shown on the original documents are not entirely discernible on the microfilm. The microfilming technicians have made every effort to capture all the text shown on each document. At times, they have made intentional retakes of documents. The filmers have photographed a document a second (or even third) time at a different exposure rate or at a different angle to ensure that all the information on the face of the document is captured on the microfilm. Retaken images are designated on the microfilm itself by the use of an in-frame target that reads "Note to researcher: retake of preceding frame." The reverse side of a page is indicated on the microfilm by an in-frame target that reads "Verso." For oversize documents, the filmers have adjusted the reduction ratio and have filmed the document in its entirety, to give an overview of the whole document. Then they have filmed the document in sequential segments, using the standard exposure rate, moving from left to right, top to bottom, so that the details are captured on the microfilm. Certain items have not been filmed because of their fragile physical condition. These items are noted on the container listing and on the microfilm. If you wish to see any of these unfilmed items, please consult with the Curator of the History of Science and Technology Program at The Bancroft Library. The following notes pertain to specific series of documents within this collection: Series 1, Correspondence: Kroeber often sent out the fair copies of his letters and retained only informal drafts or notes of his letters for his own records. Because he sometimes used light or colored pencil on colored paper, some of these letters are very difficult to read in the original, and also on the microfilm. He also retained some very poor carbon copies of some of his letters, which are also barely legible in the original and hard to read on the microfilm.
Recommended publications
  • SM 9 the Methods of Ethnology

    SM 9 the Methods of Ethnology

    Savage Minds Occasional Papers No. 9 The Methods of Ethnology By Franz Boas Edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub First edition, 18 January, 2014 Savage Minds Occasional Papers 1. The Superorganic by Alfred Kroeber, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 2. Responses to “The Superorganic”: Texts by Alexander Goldenweiser and Edward Sapir, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 3. The History of the Personality of Anthropology by Alfred Kroeber, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 4. Culture and Ethnology by Robert Lowie, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 5. Culture, Genuine and Spurious by Edward Sapir, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 6. Culture in the Melting-Pot by Edward Sapir, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 7. Anthropology and the Humanities by Ruth Benedict, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 8. Configurations of Culture in North America, by Ruth Benedict, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub 9. The Methods of Ethnology, by Franz Boas, edited and with an introduction by Alex Golub Copyright information This original work is copyright by Alex Golub, 2013. The author has issued the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States license. You are free • to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work • to remix - to adapt the work Under the following conditions • attribution - you must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author • noncommercial - you may not use this work for commercial purposes • share alike - if you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one This work includes excerpts from Boas, Franz.
  • Linton, Ralph

    Linton, Ralph

    ANTHROPOLOGY THOUGHT JUNE 2019 Linton, Ralph Ralph Linton (1893–1953), American cultural anthropologist, was one of the major contributors to the reconstruction of anthropology during the second quarter of the twentieth century. Trained in the traditions of the North American “historical school” of anthropology, Lin ton remained loyal throughout his career to the broad interests and general principles established by Franz Boas and other American anthropologists. But with the publication in 1936 of The Study of Man, which was quickly recognized by social scientists all over the world as a pioneering study of human behavior, he embarked on a series of creative and stimulating studies which provided new conceptions of social structure and cultural organization. He related these conceptions in a clear if somewhat simple manner to the biological individual and his personality and utilized them in his analyses of the processes of cultural change. Linton belonged to the “third generation” of American academic anthropologists, succeeding such second-generation students of Putnam and Boas as Wissler, Dixon, Kroeber, Goldenweiser, Lowie, Sapir, and Radin. These academicians, together with a number of outstanding journeymen and masters involved more in field research than in teaching, had created a distinctive variety of anthropology. Like Tylor in England, they had a holistic approach to human studies which is still, thanks in part to Linton, a mark of American anthropology. In the Americas much more than in Europe almost all anthropological study and training had been nurtured by experience in the field and disciplined by the empiricism required by field work on specific problems treating the temporal and spatial dimensions of culture.
  • Clifford-Ishi's Story

    Clifford-Ishi's Story

    ISHI’S STORY From: James Clifford, Returns: Becoming Indigenous in the 21st Century. (Harvard University Press 2013, pp. 91-191) Pre-publication version. [Frontispiece: Drawing by L. Frank, used courtesy of the artist. A self-described “decolonizationist” L. Frank traces her ancestry to the Ajachmem/Tongva tribes of Southern California. She is active in organizations dedicated to the preservation and renewal of California’s indigenous cultures. Her paintings and drawings have been exhibited world wide and her coyote drawings from News from Native California are collected in Acorn Soup, published in 1998 by Heyday Press. Like coyote, L. Frank sometimes writes backwards.] 2 Chapter 4 Ishi’s Story "Ishi's Story" could mean “the story of Ishi,” recounted by a historian or some other authority who gathers together what is known with the goal of forming a coherent, definitive picture. No such perspective is available to us, however. The story is unfinished and proliferating. My title could also mean “Ishi's own story,” told by Ishi, or on his behalf, a narration giving access to his feelings, his experience, his judgments. But we have only suggestive fragments and enormous gaps: a silence that calls forth more versions, images, endings. “Ishi’s story,” tragic and redemptive, has been told and re-told, by different people with different stakes in the telling. These interpretations in changing times are the materials for my discussion. I. Terror and Healing On August 29th, 1911, a "wild man,” so the story goes, stumbled into civilization. He was cornered by dogs at a slaughterhouse on the outskirts of Oroville, a small town in Northern California.
  • Clyde Kluckhohn

    Clyde Kluckhohn

    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES C LYDE KAY MA B E N K LUCKHOHN 1905—1960 A Biographical Memoir by MELVILLE J. H ERSKOVITS Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1964 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. CLYDE KAY MABEN KLUCKHOHN January n, igo^—July 28, ig6o BY MELVILLE J. HERSKOVITS HEN CLYDE KLUCKHOHN was seventeen years old ill health W caused him to spend two years in New Mexico and Arizona, on what he later described as "the fringes of the Indian Country." This experience was to be decisive in shaping his subsequent career as an anthropologist. It brought into focus what, in his own words, was "the fact that I grew up in an English settlement in Iowa and early perceived, however dimly, a cross-cultural situation." It was this perception, steadily sharpened by continuous field research, omnivorous reading, and constant probing for theoretical implica- tion, that brought him to the point of achievement and reputa- tion he had attained when a coronary thrombosis abruptly ended his life in the very Indian country where he had worked, and which he so greatly loved. During all his scientific career he consistently followed both mi- croethnographic and macroethnographic lines of anthropological in- terest. There are, in various parts of die world, those who are dis- tinguished because of the skill with which they have probed ever more deeply into particular cultures, but it is difficult to name one who is as deeply concerned with theoretical significance as with ethnographic fact.
  • Examination of Otis T. Mason's Standard of Authenticity| Salvage Ethnography and Indian Baskets at the Smithsonian Institution

    Examination of Otis T. Mason's Standard of Authenticity| Salvage Ethnography and Indian Baskets at the Smithsonian Institution

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2002 Examination of Otis T. Mason's standard of authenticity| Salvage ethnography and Indian baskets at the Smithsonian Institution Zachary T. Androus The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Androus, Zachary T., "Examination of Otis T. Mason's standard of authenticity| Salvage ethnography and Indian baskets at the Smithsonian Institution" (2002). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2282. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2282 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of Montana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission __ No, I do not grant permission __ Author's Signature; Date: Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. 8/98 An Examination of Otis T. Mason’s Standard of Authenticity; Salvage Ethnography and Indian Baskets at the Smithsonian Institution by Zachary T.
  • Ishi and Anthropological Indifference in the Last of His Tribe

    Ishi and Anthropological Indifference in the Last of His Tribe

    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 11; June 2013 "I Heard Your Singing": Ishi and Anthropological Indifference in the Last of His Tribe Jay Hansford C. Vest, Ph.D. Enrolled member Monacan Indian Nation Direct descendent Opechanchanough (Pamunkey) Honorary Pikuni (Blackfeet) in Ceremonial Adoption (June 1989) Professor of American Indian Studies University of North Carolina at Pembroke One University Drive (P. O. Box 1510) Pembroke, NC 28372-1510 USA. The moving and poignant story of Ishi, the last Yahi Indian, has manifested itself in the film drama The Last of His Tribe (HBO Pictures/Sundance Institute, 1992). Given the long history of Hollywood's misrepresentation of Native Americans, I propose to examine this cinematic drama attending historical, ideological and cultural axioms acknowledged in the film and concomitant literature. Particular attention is given to dramatic allegorical themes manifesting historical racism, Western societal conquest, and most profoundly anthropological indifference, as well as, the historical accuracy and the ideological differences of worldview -- Western vis-à-vis Yahi -- manifest in the film. In the study of worldviews and concomitant values, there has long existed a lurking "we" - "they" proposition of otherness. Ever since the days of Plato and his Western intellectual predecessors, there has been an attempt to locate and explicate wisdom in the ethnocentric ideological notion of the "civilized" vis-à-vis the "savage." Consequently, Plato's thoughts are accorded the standing of philosophy -- the love of wisdom -- while Black Elk's words are the musings of the "primitive" and consigned to anthropology -- the science of man. Philosophy is, thusly, seen as an endeavor of "civilized" Western man whom in his "science of man" or anthropological investigation may record the "ethnometaphysics" of "primitive" or "developing" cultures.
  • Culture History: a Culture- Historical Approach

    Culture History: a Culture- Historical Approach

    CHAPTER 2 Culture History: A Culture- Historical Approach GARY S. WEBSTER The history of ideas is concerned with all that called culture-historical. And it distinguishes culture- insidious thought, that whole interplay of rep- historical from alternate contemporaneous types of resentations that flow anonymously between texts (e.g., functional-processual, evolutionary) on the men. basis not of age or author or sociopolitical function, -Michel Foucault, but rather on the basis of the formal characteristics The Archaeology of Knowledge displayed by their statements. As with any classificatory approach, culture his- CULTUREHISTORYCAN be variously conceived. Many tory has benefits and weaknesses (Mayr 1995). On the have considered it the dominant twentieth-cen- positive side it puts order to the unwieldy variation tury paradigm prior to the New Archaeology of the displayed by the massive culture-historical literature. 1960s-at least among Anglo-American trained ar- In doing so it makes possible comparisons with other chaeologists (Strong 1952; Trigger 1989:206; Lyman such traditions, as well as their accompanying dis- et al. 1997b:v, 1997a:1; Binford 1965, 1968; Caldwell course. A classificatory approach also seems especially 1959; Meltzer 1979; Dunnell 1978; Flannery 1967). suited to a phenomenon of such uncertain historical Others, like Clarke, have seen it as a preparadigmatic integrity. For it is important to realize that culture- "disconnected bundle of inadequate sub-theories" (D. historical archaeology-its tenets and principles-was Clarke 1968:xiii). It is often written about as though largely defined in retrospect, and usually by its critics synonymous with the research histories or biographies (Lyman et al.
  • De Laguna 1960:102

    De Laguna 1960:102

    78 UNIVERSITY ANTHROPOLOGY: EARLY1DEPARTMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES John F. Freeman Paper read before the Kroeber Anthropological Society April 25, 1964, Berkeley, California I. The Conventional View Unlike other social sciences, anthropology prides itself on its youth, seeking its paternity in Morgan, Tylor, Broca, and Ratzel, its childhood in the museum and its maturity in the university. While the decades after 1850 do indeed suggest that a hasty marriage took place between Ethnology, or the study of the races of mankind conceived as divinely created, and Anthropology, or the study of man as part of the zoological world; the marriage only symbol- ized the joining of a few of the tendencies in anthropology and took place much too late to give the child an honest name. When George Grant MacCurdy claimed in 1899 that "Anthropology has matured late," he was in fact only echoing the sentiments of the founders of the Anthropological Societies of Paris (Paul Broca) and London (James Hunt), who in fostering the very name, anthropology, were urging that a science of man depended upon prior develop- ments of other sciences. MacCurdy stated it In evolutionary terms as "man is last and highest in the geological succession, so the science of man is the last and highest branch of human knowledge'" (MacCurdy 1899:917). Several disciples of Franz Boas have further shortened the history of American anthropology, arguing that about 1900 anthropology underwent a major conversion. Before that date, Frederica de Laguna tells us, "anthropologists [were] serious-minded amateurs or professionals in other disciplines who de- lighted in communicating-across the boundaries of the several natural sci- ences and the humanities, [because] museums, not universities, were the cen- ters of anthropological activities, sponsoring field work, research and publication, and making the major contributions to the education of profes- sional anthropologists, as well as serving the general public" (de Laguna 1960:91, 101).
  • Art, Artifact, Anthropology: the Display and Interpretation of Native American Material Culture in North American Museums Laura Browarny Seton Hall University

    Art, Artifact, Anthropology: the Display and Interpretation of Native American Material Culture in North American Museums Laura Browarny Seton Hall University

    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs) 2010 Art, Artifact, Anthropology: The Display and Interpretation of Native American Material Culture in North American Museums Laura Browarny Seton Hall University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Browarny, Laura, "Art, Artifact, Anthropology: The Display and Interpretation of Native American Material Culture in North American Museums" (2010). Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 736. https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/736 Art, Artifact, Anthropology: The Display and Interpretation of Native American Material Culture in North American Museums By Laura Browarny Advised by Dr. Charlotte Nichols, Ph.D Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts in Museum Professions Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ August 2010 Abstract Native American material culture appears in a wide variety of museum contexts across the United States. Historically, these artifacts have been misinterpreted, misrepresented, and ultimately disrespected. Today, many museums are making strides to reorganize and rejuvenate their American lndian collections, and these attempts are manifested differently in each museum genre. In this paper, I discuss the history of the display of lndian objects in different types of museums, the ways in which these methods of display have evolved over time, and how these early conventions still influence current museum practices. I analyze the theory and works of Franz Boas and relate his early methods to modern museum practices. Finally, I present a series of case studies on various museums that actively collect and exhibit lndian cultural material, including the Metropolitan Museum of Art, The American and Field Museums of Natural History, the Museum of lndian Arts and Culture, and the Navajo Nation Museum.
  • Reminiscences of Anthropological Currents in America Half a Century Ago

    Reminiscences of Anthropological Currents in America Half a Century Ago

    UC Berkeley Anthropology Faculty Publications Title Reminiscences of Anthropological Currents in America Half a Century Ago Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2vk1833m Journal American Anthropologist, 58(6) Author Lowie, Robert H. Publication Date 1956-12-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Reminiscences of Anthropological Currents in America Half a Century Ago ROBERT H. LOWIE University of California HE Editor of the AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST has asked me to offer "some T discussion and analysis of the intellectual ferment, the various ideas and interests, and the important factual discoveries in their relationship to these ideas, that were current during the period of your early years as an anthropolo­ gist." In responding I shall have to go far afield. The task suggested implies nevertheless two noteworthy restrictions. Factual discoveries are irrelevant (except as they influenced ideas), as is administrative promotion of scientific interests. Accordingly, though sharing Sapir's judgment that as a field worker J. O. Dorsey was "ahead of his age," I must ignore him for present purposes. Again, there will be only brief references to Frederic Ward Putnam (1839-1915) and to Frederic Webb Hodge (1864-1956); as to Powell and McGee, only their thinking demands extended notice. It is well to recall that in 1904, when I began graduate work, only Columbia, Harvard, and California had full-fledged academic departments of anthropol­ ogy, but the Field Museum, a descendant of the Chicago World's Fair of 1893, had been fostering research, as had the Bureau of American Ethnology and the United States National Museum.
  • A History Southeastern Archaeological Conference Its Seventy-Fifth Annual Meeting, 2018

    A History Southeastern Archaeological Conference Its Seventy-Fifth Annual Meeting, 2018

    A History m of the M Southeastern Archaeological Conference m in celebration of M Its Seventy-Fifth Annual Meeting, 2018 Dedicated to Stephen Williams: SEAC Stalwart Charles H. McNutt 1928–2017 Copyright © 2018 by SEAC Printed by Borgo Publishing for the Southeastern Archaeological Conference Copy editing and layout by Kathy Cummins ii Contents Introduction .............................................................................................1 Ancestors ..................................................................................................5 Setting the Agenda:The National Research Council Conferences ....................................................................15 FERACWATVAWPA ............................................................................21 Founding Fathers ...................................................................................25 Let’s Confer !! .........................................................................................35 The Second Meeting ..............................................................................53 Blest Be the Tie That Binds ..................................................................57 The Other Pre-War Conferences .........................................................59 The Post-War Revival ............................................................................65 Vale Haag ................................................................................................73 The CHSA-SEAC Years (1960–1979)..................................................77
  • Hi Good Report

    Hi Good Report

    CHAPTER THREE EARLIEST PUBLISHED ACCOUNTS about Harmon Augustus Good List of Documents 1 Letter from Alexander R. Barrington to William Barrington Feb. 29, 1856 2 Letter from Harmon A. Good to Governor Leland Stanford August 8, 1862 3 Harmon Good’s Newspaper Obituaries (6) May 7, 14 and May 27, 1870 4 “The Adventures of Captain Hi Good” by Dan Delaney, June 7, 1872 5 “The Kom’-bo” by Stephen Powers, 1877 6 “Indian Difficulties” by Harry L. Wells and W. L. Chambers, 1882 7 Fighting the Mill Creek Indians, Ch. XV, by Robert Anderson, 1909 8 “The Yana Indians” by Thomas Waterman, 1918, with informants William J. Seagraves (1915) & Almira (Brown) Williams (1912) 9 “The Murder of Hi Good” from The Last of the Mill Creeks by Simeon Moak, 1923 10 “The Long Concealment” from Ishi In Two Worlds by Theodora Kroeber, 1961 Document #1 -233- Figure 135. Lower Deer Creek where she divides into channels for about a one stretch mile before reuniting, while veering through Sections 22 and 27 of Tehama County’s Las- sen Township 25N, R1W (See also Fig.152 map of the same on page 266). In the far middle distance, Deer Creek can be barely seen heading to the right, in a westerly direc- tion to empty into the Sacramento River. Photo by author taken March 17, 2007. Hi Good’s former ranch location (SE ¼ of Section 33), is in the distance (far left), Alexander Robb Barrington’s former “Rio Alto Ranch” (160 acres) is in the distant middle, while Good’s sheep camp (study area, CA-TEH-2105H) is out of view in this photo, to the north (far right) about 1 ½ miles distant.