DOCSLIB.ORG

Wintu Boundary Poster

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wintu Boundary Poster Clarification of the California Wintu Northern Boundary Various views: 1877-2007 Alfred L. Kroeber's map Drawing lines on the map of California to divide Indian tribal territory relied heavily on interpretation. Based on the theoretical background of the scholar – linguistics, ethnography, archaeology, or ecology – the boundaries won’t be the same and the results may be subject to lively debate. Interestingly, the research, descriptions, and debates were by and among the scholars. The Indian C. Hart Merriam’s map: 1955 Mt. Shasta tribes being studied, to the extent they did still exist, may have been consulted for reference, but were not generally consulted as 14163 expert authorities. C. Hart Merriam’s unaltered description of the boundaries of the Wintu, "Tribes of Wintoon #0 "From Mt. Shasta the northern boundary passes Shas'-te a little north of Black Fox Mountain." p. 3 Stock," was published in Studies of California Indians (1955). Boundary features on this Alfred L. Kroeber (1876 – 1960) and C. Hart Merriam (1855 – 1942) were professional contemporaries. Both devoted much of their McTavish drew two straight lines to go map are based on GIS layers of hydrologic drainage areas, rivers, streams, mountains, around Black Fox Mountain. careers to studying Indian issues. Kroeber’s Handbook of the Indians of California was first published in 1925; he introduced it as “the and cultural features that were described by Merriam. Differing from cartographic Mo'dok Salmon Ri outcome of 17 years of acquaintance and occupation with the Indians of California.” The data came primarily from ethnographers v S er S convention, the colors were varied in order to differentiate thae segments referred to by c Black Butte o lm variously affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History, University of California, and Bureau of American Ethnology of the t Merriam, and his text is quoted to explain the location. If I hado to interpret Merriam’s writing, t 6325 n R # i 0 R Smithsonian. Kroeber had worked closesly with linguist Roland Dixon to establish the language families. C. Hart Merriam, from about v or used a source other than his text, I included that explanationi as well. e v Black Fox Mountain r Wi'-bos e 1902 to 1935, spent five to six months each year doing field work with various Native American tribes in western United States, r "The name Wi’-bos is applied to the "Wi’-bos" continued 6202 #0 including the Wintu. However, most of his research on Indians was published posthumously. Merriam began his career as a medical doctor but soon switched his research northernmost Wintoon – those Wintoon regard the Wi’-bos as a distinct to biology, studying living animals. By the time he was thirty, Merriam was the director occupying the upper waters of the tribe; Roland Dixon thinks they are a Sacramento and McCloud rivers and branch of the Shaste and calls them Prior to Kroeber’s 1925 Handbook, Stephen Powers’ 1877 report and map, Tribes of California, had been the only systematic study A of the USDA Biological Survey, which specialized in mapping the geographical distribution s The eastern boundary extends Squaw Creek. Their territory is said to Okwanutsu, a term which, as I have h of California Indians. Where Powers' map didn’t correspond to Kroeber’s interpretation, Kroeber explained the differences were C of the animals of North America. In 1899 E. H. Harriman, the railroad financier, asked r from near Bartles southwest to extend from Sisson east to Black Fox elsewhere shown, is simply a Shaste word e due to advances in the field of linguistics – his specialty. In Kroeber’s writing about the Hokan family, he includes six Shastan e Merriam to organize and direct his summer vacation – an expedition to Alaska. This led to Mountain and Bartles. They are said meaning ‘south people’ and has no tribal k Grizzly Peak." p. 3 language groups, including the Shasta Tribe to the north of the Wintu and the Achumawi to the east. Kroeber wrote in the 1925 a lifelong friendship with Mrs. Harriman. In 1910 she established a trust for him, to have intermarried extensively with significance. The Shaste call the Wintoon Handbook that little was known about the Wintu, but he considered them valley people who had made their way into the hills. By administered through the Smithsonian Institution, that enabled him to fully dedicate the Modok – some say the Shaste and Hah-to-kwe-wah, and say that they held all the 1900s the Okwanuchu were extinct, if they ever existed. However, the Okwanuchu area provides a logical place on the map for himself to research without financial worries. Modesse also – and to have talked a the country south of Mt. Shasta and the a linguistic bridge between the Shasta and Achumawi. Differing in his belief about the northern Wintu boundary from Powers, Kroeber "The northern boundary of the Wintoon extends mixed language. Some of the McCloud upper Sacramento to Sisson." p. 10 continued "Wi’-bos" Bartle argued strongly that the extinct Okwanuchu tribe was part of the Shasta tribe. Kroeber’s authority as an Indian linguistic expert, his east from the high divide between the waters of H! At the time Kroeber and Merriam were doing their research, they were acutely aware of M widely published writings, and his position at UC Berkeley as both Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Museum of Trinity River and those of Scott River to Black u the race against time to try to record details from Indians who had first-hand knowledge d Anthropology gave his version of the Wintu boundary credence; it was cited and reproduced by subsequent authors. Merriam Butte and Mt. Shasta." p. 3 C r of life before California became an American Territory in 1848. Merriam knew that e M Ka-hoo'-tin-e'-ruk e disagreed with Kroeber, but his work describing the Northern Wintu boundaries went unpublished until 1955, in Studies of California c his view of the Okwanuchu differed from Kroeber and others, insisting that "Okwanuchu" k C lo Indians. u was simply a Shasta word for "south of here." d R i v Dunsmuir e H! r Modes'se The maps below document changes in Wintu tribal boundaries from Powers to Kroeber. Kroeber's version has been widely reproduced Robert Heizer, Professor of Anthropology at UC Berkeley, and former student of Kroeber, r in subsequent publications, especially by those who worked closely with the staff and researchers of UC Berkeley. The maps below e v arranged for publication of much of Merriam’s work. Merriam had stipulated that his Indian i have been scanned and georeferenced and the Wintu territory was colorized to make it easier to see. Merriam’s boundary, outlined in R y data could be published by others so long as they “should reproduce him exactly, without t i red, was added for comparison. Mount Shasta was added for reference. n i alteration.” In 1966, for the Indian Claims Commission, California Dockets 31 and 37, r T Heizer and Kroeber published Languages, Territories and Names of California Indian Powers' and Kroeber’s maps were originally drawn at a scale of ca. 1:1,810,000. Tribes. Included were two maps prepared by Heizer and Kroeber. One map showed a Grizzly Peak revision of Kroeber’s tribal territory map. The other map was based on Merriam’s boundary 6252# Source: Heizer, Robert F. 1978. "Introduction." In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8, edited by William C.Sturtevant, General Editor, and Robert F. 0 Heizer, Volume Editor. p 1-5. Washington: Smithsonian Institution. descriptions as prepared by Dr. Merriam’s daughter, Zenaida Merriam Talbot. Heizer r XY explained these lingustic maps show language stock with subdivisions of tribal or dialect e MCCLOUD DAM ffee Cre v Co ek i boundaries. While the 1966 map was based on Merriam's work, his boundaries of the R o "From Grizzly Peak the eastern boundary continues r t e n v e Wintu were modified to conform to Kroeber's view, continuing to attribute the Okwanuchu i south along the divide between Squaw Creek and S m ou R a th y r the Big Bend of Pit River." p. 3 area to the Shasta Tribe. Therefore, I believe this presentation may be the first time t c Fo i a Stephen Powers: 1877 r n k i S Merriam's boundaries have been mapped as he intended. Sa r lm T on R k Mt. Shasta Source: Powers, Stephen. 1877. Map Showing the Distribution of the iv r er o Num-te-pom F Indian Tribes in California: To Illustrate Report of Stephen Powers. Map. Source: Kroeber, Alfred L. 1955. "C. Hart Merriam as Anthropologist." In Studies of California Indians, edited #0 t s Washington, D.C.: Geographical and Geological Survey of the Rocky by the Staff of the Department of Anthropology of the University of California. vii-xiv. Berkeley: University of a "The Num-te-pom or Sacramento River E Mountain Region (U.S.). Drawn for Sturtevant, 1978 Handbook of North California Press. Division comprises the drainage basin American Indians. "The western boundary extends south from the of the upper Sacramento, locally known Heizer, Robert Fleming. 1966. Languages, Territories, and Names of California Indian Tribes. Berkeley: high divide between the waters of South Fork as the “Little Sacramento,” extending er University of California Press. Salmon River and those of Coffee Creek." p. 3 from the head of the river at Sisson down v Stephen Powers made the first systematic maps of tribal i R Ach'-o-ma'-we to its junction with the Pit River.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iii I 11 1111111111111111111
    A 13.2: K ~ -- Nry K 67x Cultural Resource Overview Klamath National Forest, California James A. McDonald USDA-Forest Service Klamath National Forest 6-02Ma . ., Doca-I..S. A 13.2:K 67x McDonald, James A. Cultural resource overview Klamath Natl I ~111111111IIIII J3 5138 11 000657291111111111111111111 3 Management Summary This report synthesizes information on the Klamath National Forest area environment and culture history, discusses the significance of the Forest's cultural resources, and makes recommendations for managing those resources. This report is one of a series of reports which will also provide descriptive summaries of Forest cultural resources, predict their distribution, and evaluate the effects of Forest activities on the resources. The Klamath National Forest environment is varied and complex. It includes the Klamath Mountains and Cascades/Modoc Plateau geomorphic provinces. The ruggedness of the Klamath Mountains province and water supply problems in the Cascades/Modoc Plateau province create challenges for those who occupy and use them. Variations in elevation, soil, moisture, aspect and vegetation create numerous local environments within each province. Little is known about the early prehistory of the Forest, although it is likely that the area was occupied by at least 4000 B.C. By the time European-Americans arrived in the area, it was occupied by people belonging to three cultures: the Karok, Shasta, and Modoc. Differences between these cultures may have originated partly from adaptation to differing local environments. The first European-Americans to enter the Forest area were members of Hudson's Bay Company trapping and exploring expeditions. They appeared in the late 1820's.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccloud Area Recreation Guide
    McCloud Area Recreation Guide McCloud Station • Shasta-McCloud Management Unit • Shasta-Trinity National Forest SHASTA ajmwcV814 TRINITY This Recreation Opportunity Guide provides a brief overview of recreation facilities and opportunities available in the McCloud area of the Shasta-Trinity National Forest. Whether you are planning to go camping, fishing, hiking, boating, picnicking, snow­ mobiling, cross country skiing or sight seeing, the choices for recreation are almost unlimited. Recreation plus… During the late spring, summer and early fall, the McCloud River is the most popular attraction in this area, offering fishing, swimming, camping and spectacular scenery. During the winter months, snowmobiling, cross country skiing and downhill skiing are the top ranking outdoor opportunities. Developed campgrounds and facilities… Except for Harris Springs, Cattle Camp, Trout Creek Campgrounds and Lake McCloud Boat Ramp, all developed campgrounds and day use facilities are located along the McCloud River. All campgrounds are on a first come-first served basis and have a 14 day stay limit. River route… The McCloud River parallels Highway 89 from its source near Dead Horse Summit to Fowler’s Campground. There it turns south and continues through private property to Lake McCloud. At Lake McCloud, the river again flows through National Forest lands to a point several miles below Ah-Di-Na Campground, plus several other areas downstream to the McCloud Nature Preserve. From here, the river passes through mostly private property and public access is extremely limited until the river enters Shasta Lake. Dispersed camping… If the improved campgrounds around McCloud are too crowded and confining, you may want to try camping somewhere else.
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Crags State Park Brochure
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is Castle Crags to provide for the health, inspiration and education of the people of California by helping he lofty spires and to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological T State Park diversity, protecting its most valued natural and granite dome of Castle Crags cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high-quality outdoor recreation. rise to more than 6,500 feet. The grandeur of the crags has been revered as California State Parks supports equal access. an extraordinary place Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park for millennia. at (530) 235-2684. This publication can be made available in alternate formats. Contact [email protected] or call (916) 654-2249. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov Discover the many states of California.™ Castle Crags State Park 20022 Castle Creek Road Castella, CA 96017 (530) 235-2684 © 2014 California State Parks M ajestic Castle Crags have inspired The Okwanuchu Shasta territory covered A malaria epidemic brought by European fur enduring myths and legends since about 700 square miles of forested mountains trappers wiped out much of the Okwanuchu prehistoric times. More than 170 million from the headwaters of the Sacramento River Shasta populace by 1833. years old, these granite formations in to the McCloud River and from Mount Shasta With the 1848 gold discoveries at the the Castle Crags Wilderness border the to Pollard Flat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wintu and Their Neighbors: a Very Small World-System
    THE WINTU AND THEIR NEIGHBORS: A VERY SMALL WORLD-SYSTEM Christopher Chase-Dunn Department of Sociology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, ND 21218 ABSTRACT The world-systems perspective analyzes the modern international system. This approach can be applied to long range social evolution by studying smaller regional intersocietal systems such as the late pre-contact Wintu and their neighbors. Three questions: 1. What was the nature of integration among wintu groups and between them and neighboring groups? 2. What are the spatial characteristics of this network regarding fall­ off of the impact of events? 3. Was there regional soc~ally­ structured inequality in this system? Archaeological data may allow estimation of extent and rate of Wintu expansion, obsidian trade patterns, settlement sizes, and other features of this little world-system. INTRODUCTION This paper describes a theoretical approach for the comparative study of world-systems and a preliminary consideration of a small regional intersocietal system composed of the Wintu people and their neighbors in Northern California. I am currently engaged in the study of two "cases" of relatively small intersocietal networks -- the Wintu-centered system and late prehistoric Hawaii (Chase-Dunn 1991). This paper describes my preliminary hypotheses and examines possibilities for using archaeological, ethnographic, and documentary evidence for answering questions raised by the world-systems perspective. The world-systems perspective is a theoretical approach which has been developed to analyze the dynamics of the Europe­ centered, and now-global, political economy composed of national societies (cf. Wallerstein 1974, 1979; Chase-Dunn 1989; and a very readable introduction in Shannon 1989). One important structure in this modern world-system is the core/periphery hierarchy -- a stratified system of relations among dominant "advanced" core states and dependent and "underdeveloped" peripheral areas.
    [Show full text]
  • California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A
    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Written and Designed by Nicole Mullen Contributors: Ira Jacknis, Barbara Takiguchi, and Liberty Winn. Sources Consulted The former exhibition: Food in California Indian Culture at the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology. Ortiz, Beverly, as told by Julia Parker. It Will Live Forever. Heyday Books, Berkeley, CA 1991. Jacknis, Ira. Food in California Indian Culture. Hearst Museum Publications, Berkeley, CA, 2004. Copyright © 2003. Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology and the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. All Rights Reserved. PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Table of Contents 1. Glossary 2. Topics of Discussion for Lessons 3. Map of California Cultural Areas 4. General Overview of California Indians 5. Plants and Plant Processing 6. Animals and Hunting 7. Food from the Sea and Fishing 8. Insects 9. Beverages 10. Salt 11. Drying Foods 12. Earth Ovens 13. Serving Utensils 14. Food Storage 15. Feasts 16. Children 17. California Indian Myths 18. Review Questions and Activities PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Glossary basin an open, shallow, usually round container used for holding liquids carbohydrate Carbohydrates are found in foods like pasta, cereals, breads, rice and potatoes, and serve as a major energy source in the diet. Central Valley The Central Valley lies between the Coast Mountain Ranges and the Sierra Nevada Mountain Ranges. It has two major river systems, the Sacramento and the San Joaquin. Much of it is flat, and looks like a broad, open plain. It forms the largest and most important farming area in California and produces a great variety of crops.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Mt. Shasta 70305 N
    C ITY OF MT . S HASTA F REEZE M INI -S TORAGE AND C AR W ASH P ROJECT REVISED AND RECIRCULATED INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2017072042 Prepared for: CITY OF MT. SHASTA 70305 N. MT. SHASTA BLVD. MT. SHASTA, CA 96067 Prepared by: 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 JUNE 2019 C ITY OF MT . S HASTA F REEZE M INI -S TORAGE AND C AR W ASH P ROJECT REVISED AND RECIRCULATED INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2017072042 Prepared for: CITY OF MT. SHASTA 305 N. MT. SHASTA BLVD. MT. SHASTA, CA 96067 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 JUNE 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction and Regulatory Guidance ................................................................................... 1.0-1 1.2 Lead Agency .................................................................................................................................. 1.0-1 1.3 Purpose and Document Organization ...................................................................................... 1.0-1 1.4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................ 1.0-2 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................. 3.0-1 3.2 Existing Use and Conditions ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • All Our Relations
    Praise for All Our Relations “A brilliant, gripping narrative ... I urge that everyone read [All Our Relations] ... which describes the ravages of corporations and government activity on the reservations of our first natives. This is a beautifully written book.... As Winona LaDuke describes, in moving and often beautiful prose, [these] misdeeds are not distant history but are ongoing degradation of the cherished lands of Native Americans.” —Ralph Nader “As Winona LaDuke’s All Our Relations shows, a vital Native American environmentalism is linking indigenous peoples throughout North America and Hawaii in the fight to protect and restore their health, culture, and the ecosystems on their lands. LaDuke herself is a member of the Anishinaabeg nation and was Ralph Nader’s Green Party running mate in 1996. These Native American activists take inspiration from their forebears’ responsible treatment of natural systems, based on a reverence for the interconnectedness of all life forms.” —The Nation “In this thoroughly researched and convincingly written analysis of Native American culture ... LaDuke demonstrates the manners in which native peoples face a constant barrage of attacks that threaten their very existence.” —Choice “[LaDuke presents] strong voices of old, old cultures bravely trying to make sense of an Earth in chaos.” —Whole Earth “With a good ear and sharp eye, LaDuke introduces us to Native activists and records gross environmental abuse and creative resistence. By placing people in the center of the industrial soup, LaDuke tells a story that has not been told before in this way.” —Radcliffe Quarterly “A rare perspective on Native history and culture.” —Sister to Sister “LaDuke unabashedly confronts spiritual and political grassroots missions with a tenacity that, as she explains, springs up from devotion to the land.” —City Pages “A thoughtful, candid, in-depth account of Native resistance to environmental and cultural degradation ..
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Heritage Commission 40Th Anniversary Gala
    “Itu ~(/; W/is ~the ~policy 4of ~the ~state Uwd/;that Native~ Americansll/~ remains ~ ~~~~JwJU~~JJand associated grave goods shall be repatriated.” - California Public Resources Code 5097.991 Table of Contents Event Agenda ....................................................................................................................1 Welcome Letter – Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. ...........................................................2 2016 Native American Day Proclamation ...........................................................................3 Welcome Letter – NAHC Chairperson James Ramos ...................................................... 4 Welcome Letter – NAHC Executive Secretary Cynthia Gomez .........................................5 Keynote Speaker Biography ............................................................................................6 State Capitol Rotunda Displays .......................................................................................7 Native American Heritage Commission’s Mission Statement .............................................8 Tribal People of California Map .......................................................................................13 California Indian Seal ...................................................................................................... 14 The Eighteen Unratifed Treaties of 1851-1852 between the California Indians and the United States Government .................................................................................15 NAHC Timeline
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction
    1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Ethnographic setting The Chimariko language was spoken in the nineteenth century in a few small villages in Trinity County, in north-western California. The villages were located along a twenty-mile stretch of the Trinity River and parts of the New River and South Fork River. In 1849, the Chimariko numbered around two hundred and fifty people. They were nearly extinct in 1906, except for a ‘toothless old woman and a crazy old man’, as well as ‘a few mixed bloods’ (Kroeber 1925:109). The ‘toothless old woman’ Kroeber refers to was most likely Polly Dyer and the ‘crazy old man’ Dr. Tom, also identified by Dixon (1910:295) as a ‘half-crazy old man’. The last speaker probably died in the 1940s. First contact with European explorers occurred early in the nineteenth century, in the 1820s or 1830s, when fur trappers came to the region. However, the tribe was left largely unaffected by this encounter (Dixon 1910:297). During the Gold Rush in the 1850s the Chimariko territory was overrun by gold seekers. Continuous gold mining activities in the region threatened the salmon supply, the main food source of the tribe, and led to a bitter conflict in the 1860s (Silver 1978a:205). The fights between European miners and the tribe resulted in the near annihilation of the Chimariko in the 1860s. The few survivors took refuge with the neighboring Shasta on the upper Salmon River or in Scott Valley or with the Hupa to the northwest (Dixon 1910:297). Once the gold was gone and the miners left the region, the survivors returned to their homes after years in exile (Silver 1978a:205).
    [Show full text]
  • Shasta Dam Fish Passage Evaluation
    Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Contents Contents Page Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................ 1-1 Project Background ........................................................................................ 1-3 Central Valley Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Plan ............................. 1-4 2009 NMFS Biological Opinion .............................................................. 1-5 Shasta Dam Fish Passage Evaluation ...................................................... 1-6 Purpose and Need .......................................................................................... 1-7 Objectives ...................................................................................................... 1-7 Study Area ..................................................................................................... 1-8 River Selection Process............................................................................ 1-9 Shasta Lake ............................................................................................ 1-10 Upper Sacramento River Watershed .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 28Th Annual California Indian Conference and Gathering
    California Indian Conference andGathering Indian Conference California October 3-5,2013 “Honor Our Past, Celebrate Our Present, and and OurPresent, Celebrate “Honor OurPast, Nurture Our Future Generations” OurFuture Nurture 28TH ANNUAL | California State University, Sacramento University, State California PAINTINGPAINTING BY LYNL RISLING (KARUK, (KARUK YUROKYUROK, AND HUPA) “TÁAT KARU YUPSÍITANACH” (REPRESENTS A MOTHER AND BABY FROM TRIBES OF NORTHWES NORTHWESTERNTERN CALIFORNIA) letter from the Planning Committee Welcome to the 28th Annual California Indian Conference and Gathering We are honored to have you attending and participating in this conference. Many people, organizations and Nations have worked hard and contributed in various ways. It makes us feel good in our hearts to welcome each and every person. We come together to learn from each other and enjoy seeing long-time friends, as well as, meeting new ones. The California Indian Conference and Gathering is an annual event for the exchange of views and Information among academics, educators, California Indians, students, tribal nations, native organizations and community members focusing on California Indians. This year, the conference is held at California State University, Sacramento. Indians and non-Indians will join together to become aware of current issues, as well as the history and culture of the first peoples of this state. A wide variety of Front cover: topics will be presented, including: sovereignty, leadership, dance, storytelling, The painting is titled, “Taat karu native languages, histories, law, political and social issues, federal recognition, Yupsíitanach” (Mother and Baby). The health, families and children, education, economic development, arts, traditions painting represents a mother and and numerous other relevant topics.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND-USE CONFLICT at SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA a Thesis
    THE ROLE OF CRITICAL CARTOGRAPHY IN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: LAND-USE CONFLICT AT SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Geography by Anne Kathryn McTavish San Francisco, California January, 2010 Copyright by Anne Kathryn McTavish 2010 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read The Role of Critical Cartography in Environmental Justice: Land-use Conflict at Shasta Dam, California by Anne Kathryn McTavish, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree: Master of Arts in Geography at San Francisco State University. ____________________________________________________ Nancy Lee Wilkinson Professor of Geography ____________________________________________________ Jerry Davis Professor of Geography THE ROLE OF CRITICAL CARTOGRAPHY IN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: LAND-USE CONFLICT AT SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA Anne Kathryn McTavish San Francisco State University 2010 The United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) is conducting a feasibility study to increase the height of Shasta Dam. The Winnemem Wintu Indian Tribe contend that any increase in the storage capacity of Shasta Lake would inundate their remaining cultural and historic sites, tribal lands, and current homestead, an act they describe as “cultural genocide.” Critical Cartography plays a valuable role evaluating the Winnemem Wintu claim, revealing how the tribe’s claim to land was mapped, then unmapped, over the past two-hundred years. I certify that the Abstract is a correct representation of the content of this thesis. ___________________________________________ ________________ Chair, Thesis Committee Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have been amazed, delighted, appalled, and humbled as I learned about the rights, issues, and status of the Winnemem Wintu.
    [Show full text]