DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Mt. Shasta 70305 N

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Mt. Shasta 70305 N C ITY OF MT . S HASTA F REEZE M INI -S TORAGE AND C AR W ASH P ROJECT REVISED AND RECIRCULATED INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2017072042 Prepared for: CITY OF MT. SHASTA 70305 N. MT. SHASTA BLVD. MT. SHASTA, CA 96067 Prepared by: 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 JUNE 2019 C ITY OF MT . S HASTA F REEZE M INI -S TORAGE AND C AR W ASH P ROJECT REVISED AND RECIRCULATED INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2017072042 Prepared for: CITY OF MT. SHASTA 305 N. MT. SHASTA BLVD. MT. SHASTA, CA 96067 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 2729 PROSPECT PARK DRIVE, SUITE 220 RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 JUNE 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction and Regulatory Guidance ................................................................................... 1.0-1 1.2 Lead Agency .................................................................................................................................. 1.0-1 1.3 Purpose and Document Organization ...................................................................................... 1.0-1 1.4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................ 1.0-2 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................. 3.0-1 3.2 Existing Use and Conditions ......................................................................................................... 3.0-1 3.3 Project Characteristics .................................................................................................................. 3.0-2 3.4 Required Permits and Approvals .............................................................................................. 3.0-35 3.5 General Plan and Zoning Consistency .................................................................................... 3.0-35 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 4.1 Aesthetics ........................................................................................................................................ 4.0-1 4.2 Agriculture ....................................................................................................................................... 4.0-9 4.3 Air Quality ...................................................................................................................................... 4.0-11 4.4 Biological Resources ................................................................................................................... 4.0-16 4.5 Cultural Resources ....................................................................................................................... 4.0-26 4,6 Energy ............................................................................................................................................ 4.0-29 4.7 Geology and Soils ........................................................................................................................ 4.0-30 4.8 Greenhouse Gases ...................................................................................................................... 4.0-35 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................ 4.0-37 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................................................... 4.0-43 4.11 Land Use and Planning ............................................................................................................... 4.0-51 4.12 Mineral Resources ........................................................................................................................ 4.0-53 4.13 Noise ............................................................................................................................................... 4.0-54 4.14 Population and Housing ............................................................................................................. 4.0-61 4.15 Public Services .............................................................................................................................. 4.0-62 4.16 Recreation..................................................................................................................................... 4.0-64 4.17 Transportation ............................................................................................................................... 4.0-65 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................ 4.0-69 4.19 Utilities and Service Systems ....................................................................................................... 4.0-71 4.20 Wildfire ........................................................................................................................................... 4.0-75 City of Mt. Shasta Freeze Mini-Storage and Car Wash Project June 2019 Revised Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration i TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance ........................................................................................ 4.0-77 5.0 REFERENCES 5.1 Documents Referenced in Initial Study ..................................................................................... 5.0-1 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.0-1 Mini-Storage Characteristics ............................................................................................. 3.0-15 Table 3.0-2 Car Wash Characteristics .................................................................................................. 3.0-17 Table 4.3-1 Short-Term Construction Emissions .................................................................................... 4.0-12 Table 4.3-2 Long-Term Operational Emissions .................................................................................... 4.0-13 Table 4.7-1 Construction and Operational GHG Emissions (Annual) ............................................. 4.0-36 Table 4.12-1 Existing Noise Measurements .......................................................................................... 4.0-55 Table 4.12-2 Typical Construction Noise Levels .................................................................................. 4.0-56 Table 4.12-3 Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels ....................................................... 4.0-59 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.0-1 Regional Vicinity and Project Location Map .................................................................. 3.0-3 Figure 3.0-2 Aerial View ............................................................................................................................. 3.0-5 Figure 3.0-3 Combination Site Plan ......................................................................................................... 3.0-7 Figure 3.0-4 Mini-Storage Site Plan .......................................................................................................... 3.0-9 Figure 3.0-5 Mini-Storage Elevations ..................................................................................................... 3.0-11 Figure 3.0-6 Mini-Storage Landscape Plan .......................................................................................... 3.0-13 Figure 3.0-7 Car Wash Site Plan ............................................................................................................. 3.0-19 Figure 3.0-8 Car Wash Elevation ............................................................................................................ 3.0-21 Figure 3.0-9 Car Wash Landscape Plan ............................................................................................... 3.0-23 Figure 3.0-10 Water Line Extension ........................................................................................................ 3.0-29 Figure 3.0-11 Wastewater Collection System Plan ............................................................................. 3.0-31 Figure 3.0-12 Storm Drainage Plan ........................................................................................................ 3.0-33 Figure 4.4-1 Vegetation Community in the Project Area ................................................................. 4.0-19 Figure4.4-2 Occurrences of Special-Status Species within One Mile of the Project Area ........ 4.0-21 APPENDICES Appendix A – Car Wash Industrial Waste Discharge Permit (Draft) Appendix B – Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Appendix C – Biological Resources Appendix D – Noise Freeze Mini-Storage and Car Wash Project City of Mt. Shasta Revised Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration June 2019 ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION AND REGULATORY GUIDANCE INITIAL STUDY This document is an Initial Study, with supporting environmental studies, which concludes that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document for the Freeze Mini-Storage and Car Wash Project (project; proposed project). This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with CEQA, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq. An initial study is conducted by a lead agency to determine whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Castle Crags State Park Brochure
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is Castle Crags to provide for the health, inspiration and education of the people of California by helping he lofty spires and to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological T State Park diversity, protecting its most valued natural and granite dome of Castle Crags cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high-quality outdoor recreation. rise to more than 6,500 feet. The grandeur of the crags has been revered as California State Parks supports equal access. an extraordinary place Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park for millennia. at (530) 235-2684. This publication can be made available in alternate formats. Contact [email protected] or call (916) 654-2249. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov Discover the many states of California.™ Castle Crags State Park 20022 Castle Creek Road Castella, CA 96017 (530) 235-2684 © 2014 California State Parks M ajestic Castle Crags have inspired The Okwanuchu Shasta territory covered A malaria epidemic brought by European fur enduring myths and legends since about 700 square miles of forested mountains trappers wiped out much of the Okwanuchu prehistoric times. More than 170 million from the headwaters of the Sacramento River Shasta populace by 1833. years old, these granite formations in to the McCloud River and from Mount Shasta With the 1848 gold discoveries at the the Castle Crags Wilderness border the to Pollard Flat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wintu and Their Neighbors: a Very Small World-System
    THE WINTU AND THEIR NEIGHBORS: A VERY SMALL WORLD-SYSTEM Christopher Chase-Dunn Department of Sociology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, ND 21218 ABSTRACT The world-systems perspective analyzes the modern international system. This approach can be applied to long range social evolution by studying smaller regional intersocietal systems such as the late pre-contact Wintu and their neighbors. Three questions: 1. What was the nature of integration among wintu groups and between them and neighboring groups? 2. What are the spatial characteristics of this network regarding fall­ off of the impact of events? 3. Was there regional soc~ally­ structured inequality in this system? Archaeological data may allow estimation of extent and rate of Wintu expansion, obsidian trade patterns, settlement sizes, and other features of this little world-system. INTRODUCTION This paper describes a theoretical approach for the comparative study of world-systems and a preliminary consideration of a small regional intersocietal system composed of the Wintu people and their neighbors in Northern California. I am currently engaged in the study of two "cases" of relatively small intersocietal networks -- the Wintu-centered system and late prehistoric Hawaii (Chase-Dunn 1991). This paper describes my preliminary hypotheses and examines possibilities for using archaeological, ethnographic, and documentary evidence for answering questions raised by the world-systems perspective. The world-systems perspective is a theoretical approach which has been developed to analyze the dynamics of the Europe­ centered, and now-global, political economy composed of national societies (cf. Wallerstein 1974, 1979; Chase-Dunn 1989; and a very readable introduction in Shannon 1989). One important structure in this modern world-system is the core/periphery hierarchy -- a stratified system of relations among dominant "advanced" core states and dependent and "underdeveloped" peripheral areas.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND-USE CONFLICT at SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA a Thesis
    THE ROLE OF CRITICAL CARTOGRAPHY IN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: LAND-USE CONFLICT AT SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Geography by Anne Kathryn McTavish San Francisco, California January, 2010 Copyright by Anne Kathryn McTavish 2010 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read The Role of Critical Cartography in Environmental Justice: Land-use Conflict at Shasta Dam, California by Anne Kathryn McTavish, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree: Master of Arts in Geography at San Francisco State University. ____________________________________________________ Nancy Lee Wilkinson Professor of Geography ____________________________________________________ Jerry Davis Professor of Geography THE ROLE OF CRITICAL CARTOGRAPHY IN ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: LAND-USE CONFLICT AT SHASTA DAM, CALIFORNIA Anne Kathryn McTavish San Francisco State University 2010 The United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) is conducting a feasibility study to increase the height of Shasta Dam. The Winnemem Wintu Indian Tribe contend that any increase in the storage capacity of Shasta Lake would inundate their remaining cultural and historic sites, tribal lands, and current homestead, an act they describe as “cultural genocide.” Critical Cartography plays a valuable role evaluating the Winnemem Wintu claim, revealing how the tribe’s claim to land was mapped, then unmapped, over the past two-hundred years. I certify that the Abstract is a correct representation of the content of this thesis. ___________________________________________ ________________ Chair, Thesis Committee Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have been amazed, delighted, appalled, and humbled as I learned about the rights, issues, and status of the Winnemem Wintu.
    [Show full text]
  • PATTERNS of PREHISTORY on the Mccloud RIVER Elaine
    PATTERNS OF PREHISTORY ON THE McCLOUD RIVER Elaine Sundahl Shasta College Archaeology Laboratory Redding, California 96049-6006 ABSTRACT The lower McCloud River is well-known in the archaeological literature for its contribution to the definition of the "Shasta Complex," the archaeological assemblage and traits of the late-prehistoric Wintu. Recent archaeological investigations on the middle and upper McCloud by the Shasta-Trinity National Forest have revealed a much more diverse picture of prehistory along the river, covering at least a 5000 year period. This paper provides an introduction to the area and summarizes recent excavations. INTRODUCTION more impervious geologic formations of the Klamath Mountains, the underground reservoir The McCloud River is a major tributary to the bubbles to the surface in numerous springs to Sacramento-Pit River system, the confluence of form the upper McCloud River. The very cold. which is now inundated within Shasta Lake (Figure constant waters produced by the springs attracted 1). Much of the McCloud River has remained large runs of anadromous fish (Macdonald 1966; relatively undeveloped as large tracts of land are Haski ns 1993). owned by private fishing clubs, the Nature Conservancy, and timber companies. The term "upper McCloud" will be used in the Consequently. until the last decade, there has following paper to describe that portion of the river been very little archaeological investigation. The which primarily flows east to west along the contact major exception is the lowest portion of the river between the Cascades and Klamath Mountains; which was investigated in the early 1940s in the "middle McCloud" is that part that flows preparation for the construction of Shasta Dam.
    [Show full text]
  • California Fish and Game Commission 35
    ^^r..-^» CALIFORNIA FISH-GAME I Volume 33 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OP NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FISH AND GAME SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA EARL WARREN GOVERNOR WARREN T. HANNUM DIRECTOR OP NATURAL RESOURCES FISH AND GAME COMMISSION LEE P. PAYNE, President Los Angeles W. B. WILLIAMS, Commissioner Alturas HARVEY HASTAIN, Commissioner Brawley WILLIAM J. SILVA, Commissioner Modesto H. H. ARNOLD, Commissioner Sonoma EMIL J. N. OTT, Jr., Executive Secretary Sacramento BUREAU OF FISH CONSERVATION A. C. TAPT, Chief San Francisco A- E. BurghdufC, Supervisor of Pish Hatcheries San Prancisco L. Phillips, Assistant Supervisor of Pish Hatcheries San Prancisco George McCloud, Assistant Supervisor of Fish Hatcheries Mt. Shasta D. A. Clanton, Assistant Supervisor of Fish Hatcheries Fillmore Allan Pollitt, Assistant Supervisor of Fish Hatcheries Tahoe R. C. Lewis, Assistant Supervisor, Hot Creek Hatchery Bishop Wm. O. White, Foreman, Hot Creek Hatchery Bishop J. William Cook, Construction Foreman San Prancisco L. E. Nixon, Foreman, Yosemite Hatchery Yosemite Wm. Fiske, Foreman, Feather River Hatchery Clio Leon Talbott, Foreman, Mt. WTiitney Hatchery Independence Carleton Rogers, Foreman, Black Rock Ponds Independence A. N. Culver, Foreman, Kaweah Hatchery . Three Rivers John Marshall, Foreman, Lake Almanor Hatchery Westwood Ross McCloud, Foreman, Basin Creek Hatchery Tuolumne Harold Hewitt, Foreman, Burney Creek Hatchery Burney C. L. Frame, Foreman, Kings River Hatchery Fresno Edward Clessen, Foreman, Brookdale Hatchery Brookdale Harry Cole, Foreman, Yuba River Hatchery Camptonville Donald Bvins, Foreman, Hot Creek Hatchery Bishop Cecil Ray, Foreman, Kern Hatchery Kernville Carl Freyschlag, Foreman, Central Valley Hatchery Elk Grove S. C. Smedley, Foreman, Prairie Creek Hatchery Orick C. W. Chansler, Foreman, Fillmore Hatchery Fillmore G.
    [Show full text]
  • Wintu Boundary Poster
    Clarification of the California Wintu Northern Boundary Various views: 1877-2007 Alfred L. Kroeber's map Drawing lines on the map of California to divide Indian tribal territory relied heavily on interpretation. Based on the theoretical background of the scholar – linguistics, ethnography, archaeology, or ecology – the boundaries won’t be the same and the results may be subject to lively debate. Interestingly, the research, descriptions, and debates were by and among the scholars. The Indian C. Hart Merriam’s map: 1955 Mt. Shasta tribes being studied, to the extent they did still exist, may have been consulted for reference, but were not generally consulted as 14163 expert authorities. C. Hart Merriam’s unaltered description of the boundaries of the Wintu, "Tribes of Wintoon #0 "From Mt. Shasta the northern boundary passes Shas'-te a little north of Black Fox Mountain." p. 3 Stock," was published in Studies of California Indians (1955). Boundary features on this Alfred L. Kroeber (1876 – 1960) and C. Hart Merriam (1855 – 1942) were professional contemporaries. Both devoted much of their McTavish drew two straight lines to go map are based on GIS layers of hydrologic drainage areas, rivers, streams, mountains, around Black Fox Mountain. careers to studying Indian issues. Kroeber’s Handbook of the Indians of California was first published in 1925; he introduced it as “the and cultural features that were described by Merriam. Differing from cartographic Mo'dok Salmon Ri outcome of 17 years of acquaintance and occupation with the Indians of California.” The data came primarily from ethnographers v S er S convention, the colors were varied in order to differentiate thae segments referred to by c Black Butte o lm variously affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History, University of California, and Bureau of American Ethnology of the t Merriam, and his text is quoted to explain the location.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook Indians of California
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETH-NOLOGY BULLETIN 78 HANDBOOK OF THE INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA BY A. L. KROEBER WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1925 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E E E - | - - - - , I: _ ArA ws-A-,,' HNOLOGY [BuLL. 78 in such a way as to indi- If this was pronounced Lg sound of English "i," ,"chief " and a closer one CHAPTER 19. So the theory that Drake's THE SHIASTAN GROUP. de farther north than has is raised is for historians SHASTAN c.ROUPS: Recognition, 279; the " Sastean" division, 280; possible con ws be favorable to the new nections with non-Shastan groups, 280; the Palaihnihan " division, 282. would have to be made to THE NEW RiVER SHASTA, 282. THE KONOMIHu, 283. THE: (KWANUCHU, 284. as prevalent farther north. SHASTAN GROUPS. equal success seems very sent an almost insuperable RECOGN MTTON. a northerly portion of the terpretation of his voyage The six Shastan languages are, in the light of present knowledge, low is that he touched at the northernmost members of the scattered family designated as noted by his men in the Hokan. As a group they are also one of the most divergent subdi- t have been preserved, at- visions of the family. A tendency to change and specialization has ortherly harbor. A theory penetrated even within the group, nearly all of whose members are ~ristic central Californian so different from one another that some analysis is required before two centuries before white their kinship is perceptible. can not possibly be enter- On older ethnological maps only two languages appear in place of the half dozen now recognized: the Sastean and the Palailhnihan.
    [Show full text]
  • Headwaters Sacramento River Ecosystem Analysis - I Table of Contents
    Headwaters Sacramento United States River Ecosystem Analysis Department of Agriculture Mt. Shasta Ranger District Forest Service Shasta-Trinity National Forest Pacific Southwest Region January 2001, Version 2 (updated from version 1, dated August 29, 1995) For Further Information, Contact: Mount Shasta Ranger Station 204 West Alma Mt. Shasta, CA 96067 (530)926-4511 (530)926-4512 (TTY-TDD) (530)926-5120 (FAX) The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer Preface The Record of Decision for Amendment to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Planning Documents within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl including Standards and Guidelines for Management of Habitat for Late-Successional and Old Growth Related Species (herein called The President’s Plan), describes four components including riparian reserves, key watersheds, watershed analysis and watershed restoration. This report addresses those components with the exception of key watersheds, of which there are none in the Upper Sacramento River sub-basin.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Appendix C Cultural Tech Report
    September 9, 2015 PACIFICORP Lassen Substation Project Cultural Resource Survey DRAFT REPORT Siskiyou County, California LEGAL DESCRIPTION: T40N, R4W, SECTIONS 9, 16, 17, AND 21 USGS QUADRANGLE: CITY OF MT. SHASTA, CA. PROJECT NUMBER: 136412 PROJECT CONTACT: Michael Dice EMAIL: [email protected] PHONE: 714-507-2700 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. Lassen Substation Project – Cultural Resource Survey Cultural Resource Survey DRAFT REPORT PacifiCorp Lassen Substation Project Siskiyou County, California PREPARED FOR: PACIFICORP PREPARED BY: MICHAEL DICE 714-507-2700 [email protected] POWER ENGINEERS, INC. Lassen Substation Project – Cultural Resource Survey CONFIDENTIAL This report contains information on the nature and location of prehistoric and historic cultural resources. Under California Office of Historic Preservation guidelines as well as several laws and regulations, the locations of cultural resource sites are considered confidential and cannot be released to the public. ANA 130-227 (PER 02) PACIFICORP (09/16/2015) 136412 YU PAGE i POWER ENGINEERS, INC. Lassen Substation Project – Cultural Resource Survey THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ANA 130-227 (PER 02) PACIFICORP (09/16/2015) 136412 YU PAGE ii POWER ENGINEERS, INC. Lassen Substation Project – Cultural Resource Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT S UMMARY............................................................................................................ 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook Indians of California
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETH-NOLOGY BULLETIN 78 HANDBOOK OF THE INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA BY A. L. KROEBER WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1925 r__ I KROmBBa] HAN] The speech of th, remote origin. Th such, their ultimat( and no less than th Pomo, and others. CH1APrER 23. are concerned, is I other side of the Sa THE YANA AND YAHI. and Atsugewi. It I since it has entireb THE YANA: Origin, 336; men's and women's speech, 337; territory, 337; divi- 1lokan idioms, and ] sions, 338; designations and numbers, 339; character of customs, 340. THE that on the chart YAHI: History, 341; rediscovery, 343; the last survivor, 343; a native map, 344; Yahi geographical knowledge, 345. looks like the end Hokans-Shasta, At THE YANA. a coastwise distribu Ponio, ORIGIN. Chimariko, Yana were once neil The Yana are a people of fairly extensive territory but rather from them as the gr restricted numbers, concerning whom little general information has Sacramento Valley. been extant, but to whom mystery of some kind has usually been all Californians nortj made to attach. They were reputed of a marked physical type; their been created in their speech was not only distinctive but abnormally peculiar; in military prowess and cunning they far outshone all their neighbors; they had perhaps come from the far east. As usual, there is a thin sedi- Yana speech shows ment of fact to these fancies. tially civilizational I As regards physical type, no measurements are available. Re- dium, must be mentior port makes the Yana shorter than their neighbors, and an allusion spoke the women's foi in one of their myths appears to attribute the same conviction to spoke female.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Report
    CITY OF MT. SHASTA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SCH NO. 2005082099 SEPTEMBER 2006 Prepared for: CITY OF MT. SHASTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 305 N. MT. SHASTA BLVD. MT. SHASTA, CALIFORNIA 96067 Prepared by: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE CITY OF MT. SHASTA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROJECT SCH NO. 2005082099 Prepared for: CITY OF MT. SHASTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 305 N. Mt. Shasta Blvd. Tel: 530/926-7510 Fax: 530/926-0339 Prepared by: PACIFIC MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS Mark E. Teague, Project Manager 508 Chestnut Street, Suite A Mt. Shasta, CA 96067 Tel: 530/926-4059 Fax: 530/926-4279 SEPTEMBER 2006 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE EIR The following Environmental Impact Report (EIR) provides an analysis of the potential environmental effects that may result from the proposed project, which is adoption and implementation of revisions to the City of Mt. Shasta General Plan. The City’s last comprehensive revision of the General Plan was adopted in 1993. The Draft General Plan Revision includes track changes where there are proposed changes to goals, policies and implementation measures. In addition to revisions of the 1993 General Plan, the City proposes the following actions to help implement the General Plan and to otherwise maintain consistency with the General Plan: • Revise the City’s Land Development Code • Consider recommendations for adoption of a Noise Ordinance • Consider recommendations for improved Architectural Design Guidelines • Adopt Guidelines for the City’s implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act The General Plan for the City of Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Shasta Collection Pamphlet File Topics
    College of the Siskiyous Library Mount Shasta Collection PAMPHLET FILE TOPICS Updated April 2019 MS PAMPHLET TOPICS A Abrams Lake (Calif.) Achomawi Indians Adams, Mount (Wash.) Aetherius Society Ager Ah-Di-Na Campground Algomah Camp Art - Crafts, Jewelry, etc. Art – Engraving / Lithographs, etc. Art - Graphic Art, Logos, Drawing Art - Murals Art - Visionary Art & Artists Art & Artists - General Art & Artists - A Art & Artists - B Art & Artists - C Art & Artists - D Art & Artists - E Art & Artists - F Art & Artists - G Art & Artists - H Art & Artists - I Art & Artists - J Art & Artists - K Art & Artists - L Art & Artists - M Art & Artists - N Art & Artists - O Art & Artists - P Art & Artists - Q Art & Artists - R Art & Artists - S Art & Artists - T Art & Artists - U Art & Artists - V Art & Artists - W-X Art & Artists - Y-Z Art & Artists - Unidentified Ascended Master Teaching Foundation Ash Creek (Calif) Association of Sananda and Sanat Kumara (Sister Thedra) Ashtar Command Ashtara Foundation Athapascan Language Audio-Visual (Movies) Audubon Endeavor (Mt. Shasta Area Audubon) Authors - Local Avalanche Gulch Avalanches MS PAMPHLET TOPICS B Baird Station Hatchery – Livingston Stone Baker, Mount (Wash.) Baxter, J.H. Bear Springs (Mt. Shasta) Berry Family Estate Bicycling Big Canyon Big Ditch Big Springs (Mayten) Big Springs - Mount Shasta City Park Big Springs - Shasta Valley Biological Survey of Mount Shasta Biology Biology - Life Zones Bioregion - Mount Shasta Black Bart Black Butte Bohemiam Club (San Francisco) Bolam Glacier (Mount Shasta)
    [Show full text]