October 2017 (PDF)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Seattle Foundation Annual Report Donors & Contributors 3
2008 The Seattle Foundation Annual Report Donors & Contributors 3 Grantees 13 Fiscal Sponsorships 28 Financial Highlights 30 Trustees and Staff 33 Committees 34 www.seattlefoundation.org | (206) 622-2294 While the 2008 financial crisis created greater needs in our community, it also gave us reason for hope. 2008 Foundation donors have risen to the challenges that face King County today by generously supporting the organizations effectively working to improve the well-being of our community. The Seattle Foundation’s commitment to building a healthy community for all King County residents remains as strong as ever. In 2008, with our donors, we granted more than $63 million to over 2000 organizations and promising initiatives in King County and beyond. Though our assets declined like most investments nationwide, The Seattle Foundation’s portfolio performed well when benchmarked against comparable endowments. In the longer term, The Seattle Foundation has outperformed portfolios comprised of traditional stocks and bonds due to prudent and responsible stewardship of charitable funds that has been the basis of our investment strategy for decades. The Seattle Foundation is also leading efforts to respond to increasing need in our community. Late last year The Seattle Foundation joined forces with the United Way of King County and other local funders to create the Building Resilience Fund—a three-year, $6 million effort to help local people who have been hardest hit by the economic downturn. Through this fund, we are bolstering the capacity of selected nonprofits to meet increasing basic needs and providing a network of services to put people on the road on self-reliance. -
ABS-Members-Book-2012.Pdf
Mission The mission of ABS is to serve the public interest as well as the needs of our clients by promoting the security of life and property and preserving the natural environment. ABS serves the marine, offshore and related industries as a self-regulatory organization for promoting the safety of life and property and protecting the environment at sea. Appropriate to this function, general management of ABS is vested in a membership comprising individuals eminent in these industries. From this membership a Council and special purpose committees are formed to provide the society with guidance and direction. The Board of Directors sets ABS policies and rule-making procedures. All committee members serve without remuneration. Administration of ABS CORPORatE OFFICERS Robert D. Somerville Linwood A. Pendexter Mark A. McGrath CHAIRMAN SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT & CHIEF SURVEYOR VICE PRESIDENT Christopher J. Wiernicki Peter Tang-Jensen Adam W. Moilanen PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT Tony Nassif T. Ray Bennett Richard D. Pride EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT & GREATER CHINA DIVISION PRESIDENT Jeffrey J. Weiner Robert W. Gilman Kenneth L. Richardson EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER VICE PRESIDENT & AMERICAS DIVISION PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT Robert A. Giuffra Jean C. Gould William J. Sember SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT Todd W. Grove Eric C. Kleess Kirsi Tikka SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT & CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER VICE PRESIDENT & PACIFIC DIVISION PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT & EUROPE DIVISION PRESIDENT Thomas A. Miller John P. McDonald SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL & CORPORATE SECRETARY VICE PRESIDENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Michael L. Carthew Dr. -
Air Emissions Inventory Executive Summary
PORT-WIDE BASELINE AIR EMISSIONS INVENTORY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY July 2005 Prepared for: PORT OF LOS ANGELES Prepared by: Starcrest Consulting Group, LLC 6200 Taggart Street Houston, Texas 77007 Baseline Air Emissions Inventory – 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure ES.1: Baseline Inventory In-Port Study Area....................................................2 Figure ES.2: South Coast Air Basin Boundary.............................................................3 Figure ES.3: OGV and Harbor Vessel Out of Port Geographical Extent....................4 Figure ES.4: Port-Related Emissions by Source Category, tons per day.....................8 Figure ES.5: Percentage of Port NOX Emissions by Source Category ........................9 Figure ES.6: Percentage of Port TOG Emissions by Source Category .......................9 Figure ES.7: Percentage of Port CO Emissions by Source Category ........................ 10 Figure ES.8: Percentage of Port PM10 Emissions by Source Category ...................... 10 Figure ES.9: Percentage of Port PM2.5 Emissions by Source Category ......................11 Figure ES.10: Percentage of Port SO2 Emissions by Source Category .......................11 LIST OF TABLES Table ES.1: 2001 Emissions by Source Category, tons per year...................................7 Table ES.2: 2001 Emissions by Source Category, tons per day....................................7 Table E.S.3 Percentage Breakdown of Port Emissions in Air Basin...........................8 Port of Los Angeles i July 2005 Baseline Air Emissions Inventory – 2001 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following individuals and their respective companies and organizations assisted with providing the technical and operational information described in this report. This report would not have been possible without their assistance and support. We truly appreciate their time, effort, expertise, and cooperation in providing access to technical and operational data. -
Washington State National Maritime Heritage Area Feasibility Study for Designation As a National Heritage Area
Washington State National Maritime Heritage Area Feasibility Study for Designation as a National Heritage Area WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION Washington State National Maritime Heritage Area Feasibility Study for Designation as a National Heritage Area WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION APRIL 2010 The National Maritime Heritage Area feasibility study was guided by the work of a steering committee assembled by the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Steering committee members included: • Dick Thompson (Chair), Principal, Thompson Consulting • Allyson Brooks, Ph.D., Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation • Chris Endresen, Office of Maria Cantwell • Leonard Forsman, Chair, Suquamish Tribe • Chuck Fowler, President, Pacific Northwest Maritime Heritage Council • Senator Karen Fraser, Thurston County • Patricia Lantz, Member, Washington State Heritage Center Trust Board of Trustees • Flo Lentz, King County 4Culture • Jennifer Meisner, Washington Trust for Historic Preservation • Lita Dawn Stanton, Gig Harbor Historic Preservation Coordinator Prepared for the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation by Parametrix Berk & Associates March , 2010 Washington State NATIONAL MARITIME HERITAGE AREA Feasibility Study Preface National Heritage Areas are special places recognized by Congress as having nationally important heritage resources. The request to designate an area as a National Heritage Area is locally initiated, -
October 2019
October 2019 Community Attributes Inc. tells data-rich stories about communities that are important to decision makers. President and CEO: Chris Mefford Project Manager: Michaela Jellicoe Analysts: Madalina Calen Spencer Cohen, PhD Diana Haring Maureen McLennon Carrie Schaden Zack Tarhouni Community Attributes Inc. 500 Union Street, Suite 200 Seattle, Washington 98101 www.communityattributes.com October 2019 E XECUTIVE S UMMARY The Ports of Seattle and Tacoma combined represent a core economic development asset for businesses and communities in Washington state and elsewhere in the U.S. Both ports facilitate the movement of millions of twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) of containerized cargo as well as millions of metric tons of breakbulk, automobiles, logs, and liquid bulk. Both ports are also host to industrial and non-industrial activities that spur job growth and economic wealth creation in the Central Puget Sound and Washington state. The Port of Seattle facilities support a large and growing cruise ship industry and serve approximately half of the North Pacific Fisheries Fleet. Exhibit E1. Estimated Direct Impacts of Activities at The Northwest Seaport Alliance, Port of Seattle, and Port of Tacoma, Washington, 2017 and 2019 Business Labor Income Jobs Output (mils) (mils) The Northwest Seaport Alliance (2017) 20,100 $5,858.7 $1,902.7 Containerized Cargo 14,900 $4,537.6 $1,502.5 Automobiles 1,300 $308.8 $108.4 Breakbulk, Logs and Other Cargo 3,900 $1,012.2 $291.9 Port of Seattle Cruise Industry (2019, 2018$) 3,000 $467.8 $122.7 Port of Seattle Commercial Fishing (2017) 7,200 $671.3 $313.4 Port of Seattle Recreational Marinas and Other Business (2017) 3,600 $728.8 $357.2 Port of Tacoma Tenants and Other Business (2017) 1,500 $852.2 $114.3 Sources: Puget Sound Regional Council, 2019; Washington State Employment Security Department, 2018; Washington State Department of Revenue, 2018; The Northwest Seaport Alliance, 2018; Port of Seattle, 2018; Port of Tacoma, 2018; Community Attributes Inc., 2019. -
Always Ready Always Safe • Always Ready
decemberAugust 2016 2006 / / volume volume 29 19 issue issue 4 4 FOUR NEW TUGS HEADED FOR HAWAII Young Brothers, Ltd., a Honolulu-based inter-island freight carrier, will be getting a major fleet upgrade beginning in the first quarter of 2018 with the delivery of the first of four new ocean-going tugs. The high-powered, 123-foot-long vessels will be built by Conrad Shipyard in Louisiana. Young Brothers is a wholly-owned subsidiaryMore of Foss than Maritime. any 12Details months on page in 5. the recent history of our com- a holiday greeting: pany, 2006 was a year in which Foss Maritime moved forward strategically in all areas of our business. JOHN PARROTTStrategic Moves in 2006Foss Maritime Company Chief until the end of 2016, when he Operating Officer John Parrott took will move to Foss’ parent company, We believe that new courses charted in our harbor services, NOW AT AlignTHE UsHELM with This Mission:over the role of president of Foss Saltchuk, and serve as senior vice marine transportation/logistics and shipyard lines of business, Provide Customers withMaritime Services on August 1, assuming president and managing director, OF FOSS MARITIME while not without risk, will further the growth and success of that are Without Equalresponsibility for the day-to-day working on special projects. operations of the company.the company for decadesParrott, to come. who Continued came to insideFoss as COO Former President, Paul Stevens, in January of this year from sister will retain the title of CEO of Foss company TOTE Maritime Alaska, (Continued on page 4) always alwayssafe • always ready ready Looking Back: Successfully Sailing through Challenges, Opportunities Fleet Infusion in Hawaii Young Brothers Ltd., Foss’ freight-carrying By Paul Stevens assist tugs, two of subsidiary in Hawaii, has ordered four Chief Executive which are hybrid- new ocean-going tugs. -
Draft Northwest Seaport Alliance Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy Implementation Plan
DRAFT Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy Implementation Plan Produced by the Northwest Seaport Alliance June 30, 2021 Executive Summary: PLACEHOLDER PLACEHOLDER i Table of Contents: PLACEHOLDER PLACEHOLDER ii Glossary: PLACEHOLDER PLACEHOLDER iii 1. Purpose The Northwest Seaport Alliance (NWSA) is committed to reducing, and ultimately eliminating, the air and climate pollution emissions of diesel particulate matter (DPM) and greenhouse gases (GHG) – that are associated with the cargo shipping operations that we manage on behalf of the ports of Tacoma and Seattle. That is why The NWSA, at its inception in 2015, joined the Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy (NWPCAS). The NWPCAS is a voluntary collaboration between the four largest port entities of the Pacific Northwest – NWSA, Port of Tacoma (PoT), Port of Seattle (PoS), and Port of Vancouver (VFPA) – to reduce air and climate pollution from their respective seaport activities throughout the Puget Sound – Georgia Basin Airshed. The NWPCAS constitutes a shared strategic framework for clean air and climate actions and investments that creates a “level playing field” across the four participating port entities, and helps them coordinate, collaborate, and hold each other accountable. The participating ports updated and renewed the NWPCAS in 2020, strengthening their commitment to reducing air and climate pollution. The 2020 NWPCAS puts forth an ambitious, aspirational, joint vision to phase out emissions from seaport activities by 2050, and a suite of high-level joint objectives and actions to advance that vision. In addition, each of the four participating port entities committed to developing a detailed implementation plan tailored to their particular policy environments, governance structures, lines of business, emissions profiles, and community priorities. -
Boats Built at Toledo, Ohio Including Monroe, Michigan
Boats Built at Toledo, Ohio Including Monroe, Michigan A Comprehensive Listing of the Vessels Built from Schooners to Steamers from 1810 to the Present Written and Compiled by: Matthew J. Weisman and Paula Shorf National Museum of the Great Lakes 1701 Front Street, Toledo, Ohio 43605 Welcome, The Great Lakes are not only the most important natural resource in the world, they represent thousands of years of history. The lakes have dramatically impacted the social, economic and political history of the North American continent. The National Museum of the Great Lakes tells the incredible story of our Great Lakes through over 300 genuine artifacts, a number of powerful audiovisual displays and 40 hands-on interactive exhibits including the Col. James M. Schoonmaker Museum Ship. The tales told here span hundreds of years, from the fur traders in the 1600s to the Underground Railroad operators in the 1800s, the rum runners in the 1900s, to the sailors on the thousand-footers sailing today. The theme of the Great Lakes as a Powerful Force runs through all of these stories and will create a lifelong interest in all who visit from 5 – 95 years old. Toledo and the surrounding area are full of early American History and great places to visit. The Battle of Fallen Timbers, the War of 1812, Fort Meigs and the early shipbuilding cities of Perrysburg and Maumee promise to please those who have an interest in local history. A visit to the world-class Toledo Art Museum, the fine dining along the river, with brew pubs and the world famous Tony Packo’s restaurant, will make for a great visit. -
National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
MARITIME HERITAGE OF THE UNITED STATES NHL STUDY—LARGE VESSELS NPS Form 10-900 OUB Mo. 1024-0018 (R«v. M6) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property________________________________________________ historic name Arthur Foss, ex-wallowa other names/site number Tugboat Arthur Foss 2. Location street & number Central Waterfront at Moss Bay not for publication city, town Kirkland _ vicinity state Washington code 53 county King code 033 zip code 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property fXl private I I building(s) Contributing Noncontributing I I public-local I I district ____ ____ buildings I I public-State [~~lsite ____ ____ sites I I public-Federal l~Xl structure 1 ____ structures I I object ______ ______ objects ____ _____ Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register _______ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this LJ nomination LJ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. -
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Case 2:02-md-00875-ER Document 2079 Filed 01/09/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS MDL DOCKET No. 875 LIABILITY LITIGATION (No.VI) (MARDOC) CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION NO. v. 2:02-md-875 and all GROUP 1 cases CERTAIN DEFENDANTS ORDER And now, this 8th day of January, 2013, after considering the parties' submissions on the question of a briefing schedule on pending Group 1 dispositive motions on the basis of the court's lack of personal jurisdiction over a defendant, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs' response to motions on behalf of defendants listed in Attachment A are due no later than February 15, 2013. These motions on behalf of 81 defendants are considered ripe based on defendants' submissions, to which plaintiffs have not objected, stating either that a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition respecting that defendant has taken place or was never requested, or that plaintiffs did not accept or cancelled an offered deposition date. 1 2. With respect to the 41 defendants listed in Attachment B, relating to defendants for whom a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition either is scheduled or is in the process of being scheduled, all of which are represented by the Thompson Hine firm, plaintiffs' response shall be due no later than 30 days after the date of the deposition.2 To prevent further delay of such depositions, the parties shall confer with Mr. Lyding to ensure that depositions are scheduled and take place promptly. -
Always Ready Always Safe • Always Ready
decemberJune 2016 2006 / / volume volume 28 19 issue issue 3 4 More than any 12 months in the recent history of our com- aDenise holiday Tabbutt and her family gathered greeting:in the pilothouse of her namesake tug after shepany, christened 2006 the was vessel a yearat Foss in Waterway which FossSeaport Maritime in Tacoma. movedSurrounding forward her, from left, are son Owen, 16, husband Mark, and sons Nick 21 and Sam, 19. strategically in all areas of our business. Strategic Moves in 2006 We believe that new courses charted in our harbor services, SECOND AlignARCTIC Us withCLASS This Mission:The second of three Foss-built event was a “proud moment” for all marine transportation/logistics and shipyard lines of business, Provide Customers withArctic Services Class tugs was christened in associated with the company. TUG IS CHRISTENED IN while not without risk, will further the growth and success of that are Without EqualTacoma on June 1, with the company’s The ocean-going tug Denise Foss TACOMA AND IS chief operating officerthe proclaiming company for decadeswas tobuilt come. at Foss Continued Rainier inside Shipyard on that the vessel represents the future of the Columbia River, and its christen- READY FOR ACTION Foss and its sponsor declaring that the ing followed by one year that of its (Continued on page 4) always alwayssafe • always ready ready Adhering to Our Values While Creating A Christening in Tacoma It’s always a happy occasion when a new An Economic Return for Our Owners Foss tug is christened, and the ceremony for the new Arctic Class tug Denise Foss was By Scott Merritt corporate values don’t change no exception. -
WARNER ARCHIVE DVD COLLECTION – Informal Collection List As of Winter 2013
WARNER ARCHIVE DVD COLLECTION – informal collection list as of Winter 2013. For updated information or to arrange viewing, please e-mail [email protected]. Item # Title DVD8925 2 WEEKS IN ANOTHER TOWN [1962] DVD7519 20,000 YEARS IN SING SING [1933] DVD9691 24 HOURS TO KILL [1965] DVD7301 3 SAILORS AND A GIRL [1953] DVD8754 -30- [1959] DVD10749 5 TIME CHAMPION [2012] DVD9877 7 FACES OF DR. LAO [1963] DVD9174 ABBOTT AND COSTELLO MEET CAPTAIN KIDD [1952] DVD7192 ABDICATION, THE [1974] DVD7206 ABE LINCOLN IN ILLINOIS [1940] DVD7171 ABOVE AND BEYOND [1952] DVD7934 ABOVE SUSPICION [1943] DVD9781 ACROSS THE WIDE MISSOURI [1951] DVD7520 ACROSS TO SINGAPORE [1928] DVD7201 ACTRESS, THE [1953] DVD10743 ADA [1961] DVD8764 ADAM’S WOMAN [1969] DVD9634 ADVANCE TO THE REAR [1963] DVD9780 ADVENTURE [1945] DVD7191 ADVENTURES OF HUCKLEBERRY FINN, THE [1939] DVD7216 ADVENTURES OF MARK TWAIN, THE [1944] DVD7743 ADVENTURES OF ONE ESKIMO, THE [2009] DVD9976 AFFAIRS OF DOBIE GILLIS, THE [1953] DVD8554 AGATHA [1978] DVD10336 AGE OF CONSENT, THE [1932] DVD9136 AGE OF INNOCENCE, THE [1934] DVD7195 AH, WILDERNESS! [1935] DVD7669 AIRBORNE [1993] DVD9800 AKIRA KUROSAWA’S DREAMS [1990] DVD7226 AL CAPONE [1959] DVD9807 ALEX IN WONDERLAND [1970] DVD8845 ALIAS THE DOCTOR [1932] DVD8118 ALIBI IKE [1935] DVD10532 ALICE [THE COMPLETE FIRST SEASON] [DISC 1 OF 3] DVD10533 ALICE [THE COMPLETE FIRST SEASON] [DISC 2 OF 3] DVD10534 ALICE [THE COMPLETE FIRST SEASON] [DISC 3 OF 3] DVD10772 ALICE [THE COMPLETE SECOND SEASON] [DISC 1 OF 3] DVD10773 ALICE [THE COMPLETE SECOND SEASON]