DOCSLIB.ORG

Revolutionary Ecology Biocentrism & Deep Ecology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revolutionary Ecology Biocentrism & Deep Ecology REVOLUTIONARY biocentrism & ECOLOGY deep ecology by JUDI BARI REVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY biocentrism & deep ecology by JUDI BARI social and biological issues, class strug- was a social justice gle, and a recognition of the role of activist for many years global corporate capitalism in the before I ever heard of oppression of peoples and the destruc- tion of nature. IEarth First! So it came as a surprise to me, when I joined Earth First! in the I believe we already have such a theory. 1980s, to find that the radical move- It is called deep ecology, and it is the ment paid little attention to the social core belief of the radical environmental causes of ecological destruction. Simi- movement. The problem is that, in the larly, the urban-based social justice early stages of this debate, deep ecolo- movement seems to have a hard time gy was falsely associated with such admitting the importance of biological right-wing notions as sealing the bor- issues, often dismissing all but “envi- ders, applauding AIDS as a population ronmental racism” as trivial. Yet in control mechanism, and encouraging Ethiopians to starve. This sent the order to effectively respond to the cri- social ecologists justifiably scurrying to ses of today, I believe we must merge dissociate. And I believe it has muddied these two issues. the waters of our movement’s attempt to define itself and unite behind a com- Starting from the very reasonable but mon philosophy. unfortunately revolutionary concept that social practices which threaten the So in this article, I will try to explain, continuation of life on Earth must be from my perspective as an unabashed changed, we need a theory of revolu- leftist, why I think deep ecology is a tionary ecology that will encompass revolutionary world view. I am not Naess. It is ancient native wisdom, expressed in such sayings as “The Earth does not belong to us. We belong to the Earth.” But in the context of today’s industrial society, biocentrism is pro- foundly revolutionary, challenging the system to its core. Biocentrism Contradicts Capitalism Marbled Murrelet, an endangered redwood species The capitalist system is in direct conflict trying to proclaim that my ideas are the with the natural laws of biocentrism. Absolute Truth, or even that they repre- Capitalism, first of all, is based on the sent a finished thought process in my principle of private property – of cer- own mind. These are just some ideas I tain humans “owning” the Earth for the have on the subject, and I hope that by purpose of exploiting it for profit. At an airing them, it will spark more debate earlier stage, capitalists even believed and advance the discussion. they could own other humans. But just as slavery has been discredited in the Biocentrism mores of today’s dominant world view, so do the principles of biocentrism dis- Deep Ecology, or biocentrism, is the credit the concept that humans can belief that nature does not exist to serve own the Earth. humans. Rather, humans are a part of nature, one species among many. All How can corporate raider Charles Hur- species have a right to exist for their witz claim to “own” the 2000-year-old own sake, regardless of their usefulness redwoods of Headwaters Forest, just to humans. And biodiversity is a value because he signed a few papers to trade in itself, essential for the flourishing of them for a junk bond debt? This con- both human and non-human life. cept is absurd. Hurwitz is a mere blip in the lives of these ancient trees. These principles, I believe, are not just Although he may have the power to another political theory. Biocentrism is destroy them, he does not have the a law of nature that exists independent- right. ly of whether humans recognize it or not. It doesn’t matter whether we view One of the best weapons of US envi- the world in a human-centered way. ronmentalists in our battle to save plac- Nature still operates in a biocentric way. es like Headwaters Forest is the (now And the failure of modern society to itself endangered) Endangered Species acknowledge this – as we attempt to Act. This law, and other laws that rec- subordinate all of nature to human use – ognize public trust values such as clean has led us to the brink of collapse of the air, clean water, and protection of Earth’s life support systems. Biocentrism threatened species, are essentially is not a new theory, and it wasn’t admissions that the laws of private invented by Dave Foreman or Arne property do not correspond to the laws of nature. You cannot do whatever you labor put into it, but also from the natu- want on your own property without ral resources used to make the product. affecting surrounding areas, because And I believe that surplus value (i.e., the Earth is interconnected, and nature profit) is not just stolen from the work- does not recognize human boundaries. ers, but also from the Earth itself. A clearcut is a perfect example of a part of Even beyond private property, though, the Earth from which surplus value has capitalism conflicts with biocentrism been extracted. If human production around the very concept of profit. Profit and consumption are done within the consists of taking out more than you natural limits of the Earth’s fertility put in. This is certainly contradictory to cycles, then the supply is indeed end- the fertility cycles of nature, which less. But this cannot happen under depend on a balance of give and take. capitalism, because the capitalist class But more important is the question of exists by extracting profit not only from where this profit is actually taken from. the workers, but also the Earth. According to Marxist theory, profit is Modern-day corporations are the very stolen from the workers when the capi- worst manifestation of this sickness. A talists pay them less than the value of small business may survive on profits, what they produce. The portion of the but at least its basic purpose is to pro- value of the product that the capitalist vide sustenance for the owners, who are keeps, rather than human beings with a pays to the workers, is sense of place in their called surplus value. communities. But a The amount of surplus corporation has no value that the capital- purpose for its exis- ist can keep varies tence, no moral guide with the organization to its behavior, other of the workers, and than to make profits. with their level of And today’s global privilege within the corporations are world labor pool. But beyond the control the working class can of any nation or gov- never be paid the full ernment. In fact, the value of their labor government is in the under capitalism, service of the corpo- because the capitalist rations, its armies class exists by extract- poised to defend ing surplus value from Floating logs at a mill their profits around the products of their labor. the world, and its secret police ready to infiltrate and disrupt any serious resis- Although I basically agree with this tance at home. analysis, I think there is one big thing missing. I believe that part of the value In other words, this system cannot be of a product comes not just from the reformed. It is based on the destruction A clearcut in the Headwaters Forest of the Earth and the exploitation of the meager environmental safeguards. This people. There is no such thing as “green has resulted in noted disasters such as capitalism,” and marketing cutesie rain- the meltdown of the Chernobyl nuclear forest products will not bring back the power plant, the oil spill in the Arctic ecosystem that capitalism must destroy Ocean, and the on-going liquidation of to make its profits. This is why I believe the fragile forest of Siberia. It has left that serious ecologists must be revolu- parts of Russia and eastern Europe with tionaries. such a toxic legacy that even the rate of human fertility has slowed. Marx stated Biocentrism Contradicts Communism that the primary contradiction in indus- trial society is the contradiction between As you can probably tell, my back- capital and labor. I believe these disas- ground in revolutionary theory comes ters show that the primary contradiction from Marxism, which I consider to be a is between industrial society and the brilliant critique of capitalism. But as to Earth. what should be implemented in capital- ism’s place, I don’t think that Marxism But even though socialism has so far has shown us the answer. One of the failed to take ecology into account, I do reasons for this, I believe, is that com- not think that it is beyond reform, as is munism, socialism, and all of the other capitalism. One of the principles of leftist ideologies that I know of, speak socialism is “production for use, not for only about redistributing the spoils of profit.” Therefore the imbalance is not raping the Earth more evenly among built in under socialism as it is under classes of humans. They do not address capitalism, and I could envision a form the relationship of the society to the of socialism that would not destroy the Earth. Or rather, they assume that it Earth. But it would be unlike Marx’s will stay the same as it is under capital- industrial model. ism – that of a gluttonous consumer. And that the purpose of the revolution Ecological socialism, among other is to find a more efficient and egalitarian things, would have to deal with the way to produce and distribute consum- issue of centralism.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brendan Lacy M.Arch Thesis.Indb
    The Green Scare: Radical environmental activism and the invention of “eco-terror- ism” in American superhero comics from 1970 to 1990 by Brendan James Lacy A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfi llment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Architecture Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2021 © Brendan James Lacy 2021 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required fi nal revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii Abstract American environmentalism became a recognizable social move- ment in the 1960s. In the following two decades the movement evolved to represent a diverse set of philosophies and developed new protest methods. In the early 1990s law enforcement and govern- ment offi cials in America, with support from extraction industries, created an image of the radical environmental movement as danger- ous “eco-terrorists.” Th e concept was deployed in an eff ort to de-val- ue the environmental movement’s position at a time of heightened environmental consciousness. With the concept in place members of the movement became easier to detain and the public easier to deter through political repression. Th e concept of “eco-terrorism” enters popular media relatively quickly indicated by the proliferation of superhero comics in the ear- ly 1990s that present villainous environmental activists as “eco-ter- rorists.” Th is imagery contrasts comics from 1970 which depicted superheroes as working alongside activists for the betterment of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feminization of Earth First!
    The Feminization of Earth First! Ms Magazine, May 1992 It is impossible to live in the redwood region of Northern CaMornia without being profoundly affected by the destruction of this once magnificent ecosys- tem. Miles and miles of clearcuts cover our bleeding hillsides. Ancient forests are being strip-logged to pay off corporate junk bonds. And bee-lines of log trucks fill our roads, heading to the sawmills with loads ranging from 1,000-year old redwoods, one tree trunk filling an entire logging truck, to six-inch diameter baby trees that are chipped for pulp. Less than 5% of the old growth redwood is left, and the ecosystem is disappearing even faster than the more widely known tropical rainforest. So it is not surprising that I, a lifetime activist, would become an environmentalist. What is surpris- ing is that I, a feminist, single mother and blue-collar worker, would end up in Earth Firstl, a "no compro- mise" direct action group with the reputation of being macho, beer-drinking eco-dudes. Little did I know that by combining the more feminine elements of col- lectivism and non-violence with the spunk and outra- geousness of Earth First!, we would spark a mass movement. And little did I know that I would pay for our success by being bombed and nearly killed, and subjected to a campaign of hatred and misogyny. I was attracted to Earth Firstl because they were the only ones willing to put their bodies in front of the TIMBER WARS The Feminization of Earth First! bulldozers and chainsaws to save the trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenpeace, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front: the Rp Ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008)
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2008 Greenpeace, Earth First! and The aE rth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher J. Covill University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Covill, Christopher J., "Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 93. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The Progression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher John Covill Faculty Sponsor: Professor Timothy Hennessey, Political Science Causes of worldwide environmental destruction created a form of activism, Ecotage with an incredible success rate. Ecotage uses direct action, or monkey wrenching, to prevent environmental destruction. Mainstream conservation efforts were viewed by many environmentalists as having failed from compromise inspiring the birth of radicalized groups. This eventually transformed conservationists into radicals. Green Peace inspired radical environmentalism by civil disobedience, media campaigns and direct action tactics, but remained mainstream. Earth First’s! philosophy is based on a no compromise approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Syndicalism, Ecology and Feminism: Judi Bari’S Vision
    Library.Anarhija.Net Syndicalism, Ecology and Feminism: Judi Bari’s Vision Jeff Shantz Jeff Shantz Syndicalism, Ecology and Feminism: Judi Bari’s Vision Retrieved on 12 January 2001 from www.cvoice.org lib.anarhija.net Contents References .......................... 9 2 According to the late Wobbly organizer and Earth Firster, Judi Bari, a truly biocentric perspective must really challenge the sys- tem of industrial capitalism which is founded upon the ‘ownership’ of the earth. Industrial capitalism cannot be reformed since it is founded upon the destruction of nature. The profit drive of capital- ism insists that more be taken out than is put back (be it labour or land). Bari extended the Marxist discussion of surplus value to in- clude the elements of nature. She argued that a portion of the profit derived from any capitalist product results from the unilateral (un- der)valuing, by capital, of resources extracted from nature. Because of her analysis of the rootedness of ecological destruc- tion in capitalist relations Bari turned her attentions to the every- day activities of working people. Workers would be a potentially crucial ally of environmentalists, she realized, but such an alliance could only come about if environmentalists were willing to educate themselves about workplace concerns. Bari held no naïve notions of workers as privileged historical agents. She simply stressed her belief that for ecology to confront capitalist relations effectively and in a non-authoritarian manner requires the active participation of workers. Likewise, if workers were to assist environmentalists it was reasonable to accept some mutual aid in return from ecology activists.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Engagement & Education
    POV Community Engagement & Education DISCUSSION GUIDE If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front Directed by Marshall Curry Co-directed by Sam Cullman www.pbs.org/pov POV LETTER FROM THE FILMMAKER NEW YORK, 2011 The making of If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front consisted of a se- ries of surprises. The first surprise hit on a cold December afternoon about five years ago, when my wife came home from her job at a public relations firm and told me that four federal agents had entered her office and arrested one of her employees — Daniel McGowan — for “eco-terrorism.” He was being charged with arson against two Oregon timber compa- nies. We were shocked. I had met McGowan through my wife, and he did not fit my expec- tation of what an “eco-terrorist” would be like. He had grown up in Rockaway, Queens, was the son of a New York cop and had been a business major in college. He didn’t look or talk like a revolutionary, and to me he seemed less like Che Guevara or Malcolm X than a typical “boy next door.” Whenever reality cuts against a stereotype, and I dis- cover that the world doesn’t work the way I thought it did, I become curious. How had someone like McGowan taken part in setting these fires and found himself fac- ing life in prison for terrorism? What could lead someone to decide that arson was a rea- sonable response to environmental problems? How had this shadowy group to which he belonged — the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) — been formed, and how had the in- Director Marshall Curry vestigators cracked it? Sam Cullman (cinematographer/co-director) and I decided to Photo courtesy of Bill Gallagher find out.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Ecology and Class Struggle: a Re-Consideration
    Radical Ecology and Class Struggle: A Re-Consideration Zabalaza Books “Knowledge is the Key to be Free” Post: Postnet Suite 116, Private Bag X42, Braamfontein, 2017, Johannesburg, South Africa E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.zabalaza.net/zababooks by Jeff Shantz Radical Ecology & Class Struggle - Page 8 References: Bari, Judi M 1994. Timber Wars; Monroe: Common Courage M 2001. “Revolutionary Ecology: Biocentrism and Deep Ecology.” Hodge Podge. 7: 35-38 Bookchin, Murray M 1980. Toward an Ecological Society; Montreal: Black Rose Books M 1986. Post-Scarcity Anarchism; Montreal: Black Rose Books M 1987. The Modern Crisis; Montreal: Black Rose Books Radical Ecology M 1990. The Philosophy of Social Ecology; Montreal: Black Rose Books M 1997. “Deep Ecology, Anarcho-Syndicalism, and the Future of Anarchist Thought.” In Deep Ecology and Anarchism: A Polemic; edited by Freedom Press. London: and Class Struggle: Freedom Press, 47-58 Bourdieu, Pierre A Re-Consideration M 1987. “What Makes a Social Class? On the Theoretical and Practical Existence of Groups.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology. 32: 1-18 Bowles, Samuel and Herbert Gintis M 1987. Democracy and Capitalism; New York: Basic Books Eckersley, Robyn M 1989. “Green Politics and the New Class: Selfishness or Virtue.” Political Studies. 37(2): 205-23 by Jeff Shantz Foreman, Dave (Toronto-NEFAC) M 1991. Confessions of an Eco-Warrior; New York: Harmony Books Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe M 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy; London: Verso Purchase, Graham M 1994. Anarchism and Environmental Survival; Tucson: See Sharp Press M 1997a. Anarchism and Ecology; Montreal: Black Rose Books M 1997b. “Social Ecology, Anarchism and Trades Unionism.” In Deep Ecology and Anarchism: A Polemic; edited by Freedom Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Unions and the Climate Justice Movement
    Unions and the climate justice movement climateandcapitalism.com/2015/10/13/unions-and-the-climate-justice-movement Posted on October 13, 2015 October 12, 2015 An IWW supporter discusses how can radical activists and environmentalists work with conservative workers and unions. Climate & Capitalism encourages open and comradely discussion of the views expressed in this important article. by Steve Ongerth Published with permission from the author, who is a member of the IWW Environmental Union Caucus. The views expressed here are not an official position of the IWW or IWW EUC. Where does the union movement stand on the issue of climate justice? The answer to that question is not entirely simple. First of all, it’s important to understand the differences between revolutionary unions (most of which are syndicalist—such as the CNT, FAI, SAC—or Marxist—such as NUMSA—in their orientation, or some hybrid inclusive of both and more—such as the IWW) and mainstream reformist unions, such as the AFL-CIO. For most revolutionary unions, climate justice is an inherent part of the struggle to overthrow capitalism, abolish wage slavery, and create a new society within the shell of the old. For example, the IWW has organized an environmental unionism caucus that dedicates itself to climate justice and other ecological issues. The 1/32 South African union, NUMSA, is a supporter of Trade Unions for Energy Democracy (TUED) and has issued a statement calling for the end to the “Mineral Industrial Complex” (even though they represent mine workers) in favor of renewable energy.[1] Where the reformist unions (sometimes called “business unions” or “class collaborationist” unions by their detractors) stand varies widely, and to be accurate, some of these “reformist” unions have more (or less) “revolutionary” orientation within the spectrum of the mainstream labor movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Realeco-Terrorism
    The REAL Eco-Terrorism COINTELPRO Tactics Target Environmentalists On May 24, 1990, Earth First! activists Judi Bari and Darryl Cherney were the targets of a car-bomb assassination attempt. The motion-triggered bomb was hidden beneath Judi Bari’s car seat and exploded as she and Darryl were driving through Oakland, California on an organizing tour for Redwood Summer, a campaign of nonviolent anti-logging protests. The FBI arrived on the bomb scene within minutes of the blast. Ignoring the physical evidence, they had Judi and Darryl arrested for trans- porting the bomb that was meant to kill them. No charges were ever filed because there was no evidence. No serious investigation of the bombing was ever conducted and the bombers remain at large. In 1991, Judi and Darryl filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the FBI and Oakland Police for false arrest, illegal search and seizure, unequal protection under the law, and First Amendment violations. lmost nine years to the day after Judi Bari and Darryl Cherney were car-bombed and then A arrested in Oakland, California, an eerily similar scenario was unfolding in Ohio. In the early morning hours of May 19, 1999, Josh Raisler-Cohn, an Oberlin College student and Earth First! activist, awoke to the terrifying sight of his car engulfed in flames. Local police and fire department investigators positively determined the fire was arson after finding the remains of a melted gas can inside the van beneath the steering wheel. Like Judi Bari and Darryl Cherney, Josh Raisler-Cohn has a thick file of death threats he had received and reported to police over a 2-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary Biocentrism & Ecology Deep Ecology
    REVOLUTIONARY biocentrism & ECOLOGY deep ecology by JUDI BARI y REVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY biocentrismy & deep ecology by JUDI BARI v social and biological issues, class strug- was a social justice gle, and a recognition of the role of activist for many years global corporate capitalism in the before I ever heard of oppression of peoples and the destruc- tion of nature. IEarth First! So it came as a surprise to me, when I joined Earth First! in the I believe we already have such a theory. 1980s, to find that the radical move- It is called deep ecology, and it is the ment paid little attention to the social core belief of the radical environmental causes of ecological destruction. Simi- movement. The problem is that, in the larly, the urban-based social justice early stages of this debate, deep ecolo- movement seems to have a hard time gy was falsely associated with such admitting the importance of biological right-wing notions as sealing the bor- issues, often dismissing all but “envi- ders, applauding AIDS as a population ronmental racism” as trivial. Yet in control mechanism, and encouraging Ethiopians to starve. This sent the order to effectively respond to the cri- social ecologists justifiably scurrying to ses of today, I believe we must merge dissociate. And I believe it has muddied these two issues. the waters of our movement’s attempt to define itself and unite behind a com- Starting from the very reasonable but mon philosophy. unfortunately revolutionary concept that social practices which threaten the So in this article, I will try to explain, continuation of life on Earth must be from my perspective as an unabashed changed, we need a theory of revolu- leftist, why I think deep ecology is a tionary ecology that will encompass revolutionary world view.
    [Show full text]
  • Plaintiffs' Offer of Proof Re FBI Misconduct
    DENNIS CUNNINGHAM (#112910) ROBERT BLOOM 3163 Mission Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415-285-8091 / fax: 285-8091 J. TONY SERRA (#32639) 506 Broadway San Francisco, CA 94133 415-986-5591; fax: 421-1331 et al., Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THE ESTATE OF JUDI BARI, and DARRYL CHERNEY, Case No. C-91-1057 CW (JL) Plaintiffs, OFFER OF PROOF vs. (AMENDED) FBI Special Agent FRANK DOYLE, Jr., et al., May 14, 2002 Judge WILKEN Defendants. PLAINTIFFS' OFFER OF PROOF REGARDING FBI MISCONDUCT Plaintiffs move this Court for leave to submit evidence of uncharged FBI misconduct, subject to a cautionary or limiting instruction, on several grounds. The Court's rulings on motions in limine included an order that plaintiffs could not introduce evidence of COINTELPRO or other misdeeds by the FBI to the extent that plaintiffs could not tie such acts to the individual defendants. Plaintiffs respectfully ask the Court to revisit its decision excluding such evidence in light of the arguments set forth below and the appendix filed herewith. 1 Contents I. Offer of proof. 3 2 Summary. 3 A. Report of proposed expert Howard Zinn, 3 Professor Emeritus, Political Science, Boston University. 4 4 B. Deposition of proposed expert Flint Taylor, Jr., Esquire, June 20, 2001. 7 5 C. Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, Church Report: 6 --Introduction and Summary --Major Finding 7 --Conclusions and Recommendations 8 --COINTELPRO: The FBI's Covert Action Programs Against American Citizens. 9 9 D. Senator Edmond Muskie denouncement of FBI's activities on Earth Day 1970.
    [Show full text]
  • COINTELPRO: the Untold American Story
    COINTELPRO: The Untold American Story By Paul Wolf with contributions from Robert Boyle, Bob Brown, Tom Burghardt, Noam Chomsky, Ward Churchill, Kathleen Cleaver, Bruce Ellison, Cynthia McKinney, Nkechi Taifa, Laura Whitehorn, Nicholas Wilson, and Howard Zinn. Presented to U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson at the World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa by the members of the Congressional Black Caucus attending the conference: Donna Christianson, John Conyers, Eddie Bernice Johnson, Barbara Lee, Sheila Jackson Lee, Cynthia McKinney, and Diane Watson, September 1, 2001. Table of Contents Overview Victimization COINTELPRO Techniques Murder and Assassination Agents Provocateurs The Ku Klux Klan The Secret Army Organization Snitch Jacketing The Subversion of the Press Political Prisoners Leonard Peltier Mumia Abu Jamal Geronimo ji Jaga Pratt Dhoruba Bin Wahad Marshall Eddie Conway Justice Hangs in the Balance Appendix: The Legacy of COINTELPRO CISPES The Judi Bari Bombing Bibliography Overview We're here to talk about the FBI and U.S. democracy because here we have this peculiar situation that we live in a democratic country - everybody knows that, everybody says it, it's repeated, it's dinned into our ears a thousand times, you grow up, you pledge allegiance, you salute the flag, you hail democracy, you look at the totalitarian states, you read the history of tyrannies, and here is the beacon light of democracy. And, of course, there's some truth to that. There are things you can do in the United States that you can't do many other places without being put in jail. But the United States is a very complex system.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO BOMBED JUDI BARI? FBI Repression of Activists in the '90'S
    WHO BOMBED JUDI BARI? FBI Repression of Activists in the '90's On May 24, 1990, a bomb exploded beneath envi- ronmental/labor activist Judi Ban's car seat as she drove False Arrest through Oakland, California with fellow activist Darryl Judi and Darryl have filed a lawsuit against the FBI Cherney. Judi and Darryl were the two most prominent and Oakland Police, charging them with false arrest and organizers for Earth First! Redwood Summer, a cam- civil rights violations. The lawsuit claims that the FBI paign of non-violent logging protests. and police knew perfectly well that Judi and Darryl were For several years before the bombing, Earth First! innocent, and that they were in fact victims of a brutal had spearheaded a growing movement of public protest assassination attempt. Their false arrest, the lawsuit charges, was part of an FBI-driven plan to discredit against the big timber corporations' strip-logging in the Earth First! and to neutralize Judi and Darryl as organiz- redwood region of Northern California. Judi in particu- ers. lar was instrumental in building a coalition of loggers and environmentalists opposed to cut-and -run logging, This lawsuit has survived three FBI attempts to and in broadening the scope and appeal of the move- have it thrown out of court, and is now in the "discovery" ment. During the month before the bombing, Judi had phase, headed for a first hearing in spring 1996. The received a series of written death threats relating to her judges have upheld Judi and Darryl's right to proceed timber organizing, the worst featuring a photo of her with all these charges, including those about the FBI's with a rifle scope and cross-hairs superimposed on her underlying motive to discredit Earth First!, based on the face.
    [Show full text]