Implementasi Undang-Undang Legalisasi Ganja Di Kanada Oleh

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Implementasi Undang-Undang Legalisasi Ganja Di Kanada Oleh Implementasi Undang-Undang Legalisasi Ganja di Kanada Oleh : Hizkia Putra Argatantra 160906056 Dosen Pembimbing: Prof. Subhilhar, MA., Ph.D. UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK DEPARTEMEN ILMU POLITIK 2021 i PERNYATAAN Saya yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini, menyatakan sesungguhnya bahwa : 1. Karya tulis ilmiah saya dalam bentuk Skripsi dengan Judul “Implementasi Undang- Undang Legalisasi Ganja di Kanada” adalah asli dan belum pernah diajukan untuk mendapat gelar Akademik, khususnya Jurusan Ilmu Politik Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik di Universitas Sumatera Utara. 2. Skripsi ini murni gagasan, rumusan, dan penelitian saya sendiri tanpa bantuan dari pihak lain, kecuali arahan dari tim pembimbing dan penguji. 3. Di dalam Skripsi ini tidak terdapat karya atau pendapat yang telah ditulis atau dipublikasikan orang lain, kecuali ditulis dengan cara menyebutkan pengarang dan mencantumkannya pada daftar pustaka. 4. Pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sesungguhnya, dan apabila dikemudian hari terdapat penyimpangan dan ketidakbenaran di dalam pernyataan ini, maka saya bersedia menerima sanksi akademik berupa pencabutan gelar telah diperboleh karena skripsi ini, serta sanksi lainnya sesuai dengan norma dan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku. Medan, 5 Februari 2021 Yang menyatakan Hizkia Putra Argatantra NIM : 160906056 i UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA FAKULTAS ILMU SOSIAL DAN ILMU POLITIK DEPARTEMEN ILMU POLITIK HIZKIA PUTRA ARGATANTRA (160906056) Implementasi Undang-Undang Legalisasi Ganja di Kanada ABSTRAK Skripsi ini membahas tentang peran Pemerintah Kanada dalam mengambil langkah Legalisasi Ganja pada akhir tahun 2018. Penggunaan ganja sendiri sudah diregulasikan oleh Negara Kanada yang pemanfaatanya diperdayakan untuk pengunaan dalam bidang medis. Tujuan penulisan skripsi ini ialah menjelaskan bagaimana ganja menjadi bagian dari Undang- Undang Kanada dan menggambarkan bahwa ganja dapat dimanfaatkan sebagai sektor baru yang vital untuk Negara Kanada. Penulisan skripsi ini juga dijelaskan dengan menggunakan teori Kebijakan Publik yang menjelaskan bagaimana Ganja menjadi instrumen yang mempengaruhi kebijakan publik di Kanada mulai dari Undang-Undang hingga mempengaruhi kehidupan masyarakat Kanada. Skripsi ini juga didukung oleh konsep Liberalisasi yang menjelaskan bahwa masyarakat Kanada diberi kebebasan untuk memilih ikut serta dalam penggunaan ganja atau tidak. Dengan metode penulisan kualitatif memungkinkan untuk dapat memahami dan menjelaskan hubungan teori yang digunakan dalam skripsi ini dengan data yang dijelaskan dalam penulisan skripsi ini sehingga dapat dipahami serta dikembangkan dan di evaluasi. Kata Kunci : Legalisasi Ganja, Kanada, Canada Cannabis Act. ii UNIVERSITY OF NORTH SUMATERA FACULTY OF SOCIAL AND POLITICAL SCIENCES DEPARTEMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCES HIZKIA PUTRA ARGATANTRA (160906056) THE IMPLEMANTION OF CANADA CANNABIS ACT. ABSTARCT This thesis discusses the role of the Government of Canada in taking steps to legalize marijuana at the end of 2018. The use of marijuana itself has been regulated by the State of Canada, whose use is empowered for medical use. The purpose of writing this thesis is to explain how marijuana is a part of the Canadian Law and illustrates that cannabis can be used as a vital new sector for Canada. The writing of this thesis is also explained by using the theory of Public Policy which explains how marijuana has become an instrument that influences public policy in Canada starting from the Act to affect the lives of Canadian people. This thesis is also supported by the concept of Liberalization which explains that Canadians are given the freedom to choose to participate in the use of marijuana or not. With the qualitative writing method, it is possible to understand and explain the relationship between the theory used in this thesis and the data described in the writing of this thesis so that it can be understood and developed and evaluated. Keywords : Cannabis, Weed, Marijuana, Canada, Cannabis Act. iii KATA PENGANTAR Segala Puji dan Syukur saya panjatkan kepada Tuhan Yesus Kristus karena berkat dan pengasihan-Nya yang saya terima serta saya rasakan di sepanjang hidup saya, terlebih khususnya selama proses pendidikan saya hingga saya bisa menyelesaikan skripsi saya yang berjudul: “IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG-UNDANG LEGALISASI GANJA DI KANADA”. Skripsi ini diajukan untuk memenuhi salah satu syarat dalam menempuh gelar Sarjana (S1) pada Program Sarjana Ilmu Politik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan. Penulis sangat bersyukur karena masih dimampukan untuk menyusun skripsi ini dalam keadaan sehat walafiat, tidak kekurang satu apapun, dan selalu dicukupkan berkat penyertaan Tuhan Yesus dalam kehidupan saya yang sangat luar biasa. Saya menyadari bahwa dalam penulisan skripsi ini masih terdapat banyak kekurangan, karena itu dengan rendah hati penulis menerima segala bentuk saran dan kritik yang membangun untuk dijadikan perbaikan bagi penulis dalam refrensi penelitian selanjutnya. Pada kesempatan ini, saya juga ingin mengucapkan terima kasih dengan hati yang paling dalam kepada keluarga tercinta yang sangat berperan besar setiap harinya dalam kehidupan saya sebagai pembimbing untuk tetap berada di jalur hidup yang benar. Terutama kepada Papa saya Stephanus Mujiiono yang sudah sangat sabar dengan semua kelakuan saya Terimaksih banyak pap untuk semua doa, dukungan dan pembelajaran hidup yang sudah papa berikan hingga saat ini, dan untuk my darling, my love, love of my life Ibunda terkasih Dewi Iriyani Alexandra Kouttjie yang selalu ada untuk saya, yang selalu mendukung, menyemangati, dan mendoakan saya dalam setiap langkah yang saya ambil. Juga untuk kedua Kakak saya Anestesia Melati Santika Devi dan Natalia Dewanti Mawar Sari untuk semua pembelajaraan yang sudah kalian berikan samaku, dan yang sudah mensupport semua kebutuhan perkuliahan Ku selama aku menjadi Mahasiswa di Universitas Sumatera Utara. For each one of you, Thank You So Much for all the prayers, love, effort, patience, happiness, all the goods you have provided me with, I can’t saya how much I appriciate all that, but I do, I really do. And most of all Thankyou God for letting me be part of this wonderful family. Saya juga ingin mengucapkan terimakasih kepada semua Kawan-kawan dan Birokrat Kampus yang telah banyak berkontribusi selama masa perkuliahan sampai akhrinya saya bisa menyelesaikan Skripsi ini, maka dari itu dalam kesempatan ini saya ingin mengucapkan Terimaksih kepada : 1. Bapak Dr. Muriyanto Amin S.Sos,. M.Si. Selaku Dekan Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sumatera Utara 2. Bapak Warjio MA, Ph.D. Selaku Kepala Program Studi Departemen Ilmu Politik FISIP USU yang telah memberikan saya dukungan penuh untuk bisa menyelesaikan perkuliahan saya. 3. Prof. Subhilhar, MA., Ph.D. Selaku Dosen Pembimbing. Terimakasih untuk arahan, kesabaran, kerelaan hati dan waktu yang diberikan untuk saya dari awal sampai skripsi ini bisa selesai. Semoga Prof dan keluarga selalu diberi kesehatan, dan berkatNya senantiasa. 4. Semua Dosen dan Asdos yang pernah memberi pelajaran kepada saya di kelas. vi 5. Samuel Amoren Yohannes Silalahi selaku sahabat pertama saya di FISIP USU terimakasih untuk semua kesempatan luar biasanya cuk. 6. Lasmin Pramono Aritonang selaku sahabat saya yang selalu tekun dalam memutar roda ekonomi global bersama-sama. 7. Raja Wira Pahlawan Simanjuntak selaku sahabat saya yang sudah seperti keluarga sendiri, terimakasih untuk kesempatan luar biasanya lae. 8. Budiiii budi 9. Erik Winalda Barus, Reynaldo Sinabariba, Agus Herman Harahap, Pak Dod, Raja David Sinambela, Gary Purba, Pak Will, Miel Wantik dan Muhammad Yuda Pratama. Selaku abang-abang Politk’14 yang paling berpengaruh dalam masa perkuliahan ku di FISIP. 10. Kawan-kawan KBM dan Partai Malam Kampus selaku wadah paling seru di USU! Terimakasih untuk semua kesempatan yang diberikan, terlebih untuk mu dinss. 11. Nanat, Celline, Salwah, Elsa (Perempuan pertama di FISIP yang bisa buat hati ini bergetar) dan Ira. Kalian inilah salah satu perempuan-perempuan hebat yang kujampai di kampus, beruntung kali pasti laki-laki yang bisa hamili klen nanti, makasih ya we buat semua tugas kuliah yang pernah klen bantu. 12. Daniel Simanihuruk, Yosua Situngkir, Egi James, Idrisky Ritonga, Wesly Ivan, Fahri, Barus Sijabat. sahabat saya di Politik 16 Terimakasih kawan-kawan senang bisa berjumpa dengan manusia-manusia seperti anda anda ini, entah apa rasanya kampus tanpa kalian ini. 13. Mas Fadil, Mas Tona, dan Mas Ben selaku kelompok PKL saya di DPR RI. Meskipun nilai kita 1 kelompok C gak masalah itu, karena 1 bulan lebih di E1-350 sama klen makan indomie selalu, ketawak selalu, happy-happy selalu adalah salah satu pengalaman yang paling seru selama perkuliahan ini. 14. Dimas Prasetya Milala dan Daniel Putra Ginting selaku sahabat saya sejak masih di sekolah dan yang masih bertahan di kota ini. Terimakasih untuk pengalaman menariknya selama beberapa tahun kita sama, terutama Daniel selaku salahsatu orang yang paling menyemangati saya untuk menyelesaikan skripsi ini. 15. Seluruh Keluarga besar teman-teman seperjuangan di Ilmu Politik 2016, terimakasih untuk kerjasama, diskusi, dan kesempatan dalam menghadapi penatnya perkuliahan. 16. Semua kawan-kawan Politik 15 dan 17 yang gabisa ku ketik namanya satu-satu kalo klen baca sampe disini, taulah kalian pasti siapa-siapa aja org nya ini. Makasih ya kawan-kawan buat semua pembelajaran dan pengalamannya. Demikian ucapan syukur dan terimakasih saya. Akhir kata, saya mengucapkan
Recommended publications
  • Annual Information Form
    CRONOS GROUP INC. ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM For the year ended December 31, 2018 DATED: March 25, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL MATTERS ............................................................................................................................................... 3 FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION ............................................................................................................... 3 CORPORATE STRUCTURE .................................................................................................................................... 6 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ............................................................................................... 7 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS ..................................................................................................................... 13 ALTRIA STRATEGIC INVESTMENT ................................................................................................................. 39 RISK FACTORS ....................................................................................................................................................... 43 DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS ..................................................................................................................... 76 CAPITAL STRUCTURE .......................................................................................................................................... 76 MARKET FOR SECURITIES ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis Legalisation and Regulations in Canada
    CANNABIS LEGALISATION AND REGULATIONS IN CANADA BACKGROUND AND CHALLENGES IVANA OBRADOVIC MEMO NO. 2018-04 SAINT-DENIS, 11 OCTOBER 2018 OVERVIEW Following Uruguay in 2013, Canada is the second country in the world – the first in G7 – that has officially legalised the production, distribution and possession of cannabis for recreational use. Starting October 17, 2018, Canadian adults have been legally able to purchase recreational cannabis produced under licence, to possess up to 30 grams of cannabis and, in most provinces, to grow up to four cannabis plants at home. Canada is the first federal state to propose a decentralised model for the regulation of cannabis. The federal Cannabis Act has introduced an approach focused on public health and youth safety: it creates a strict legal framework to control the production, distribution, sales and possession of cannabis throughout Canada. Federal, provincial and territorial governments share responsibility for overseeing the cannabis regulation system. Conspicuously, provinces and territories have had to figure out their own regulation systems for the distribution Introduction 2 and sale of cannabis and all related safety measures Why legalisation? Context, dynamic and objectives of the reform 2 (for the minimum legal age, quantities and place Context and dynamic of the reform 2 of purchase or use, etc.), whereas municipalities Situational analysis of substance use 2 have the possibility to control use at local level, History of drug reforms 3 even though it remains illegal to transport cannabis A political and electoral argument 3 outside Canadian borders (regardless of quantity). Regain control of the medical cannabis market 5 Eradicating the black market 6 The implementation of this reform involves various Sizeable financial interests 6 jurisdiction levels and diverse regulation systems Legalisation for greater control: the challenge of regulation 7 across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis and Mental Health: an Environmental Scan and Scoping Review
    Cannabis and Mental Health: an Environmental Scan and Scoping Review April 26, 2019 1 This report is authored by: Fiona Clement, PhD 1,2,3 Caroline Corbett, PhD1 Brenlea Farkas, MSc 1 Mark Hofmeister, MSc1 Ruth Diaz, MSc 1 John Taplin, BA 1 Matthew Hill, PhD 4,5,6,7 Scott Patten, MD, PhD 2,3,4,5,7 Rebecca Haines-Saah, PhD 2,3,5,7 1Health technology Assessment Unit, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary 2Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary 3O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary 4Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary 5 Mathison Centre for Mental Health Education & Research, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary 6Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary 7Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary Cite as: Clement FM, Corbett C, Farkas B, Hofmeister M, Diaz R, Taplin J, Hill M, Patten SB, Haines-Saah RJ. Cannabis and Mental Health: An Environmental Scan and Scoping Review. Produced for the Mental Health Commission of Canada. April 2019. 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 9 2. Non-Medical Cannabis Legislations in Canada ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Classifying Cannabis in the Canadian Statistical System
    Catalogue no. 11-621-M2018105 ISSN 1707-0503 ISBN 978-0-660-24784-7 Analysis in Brief Classifying Cannabis in the Canadian Statistical System by Franklin Assoumou-Ndong Release date: July 24, 2019 How to obtain more information For information about this product or the wide range of services and data available from Statistics Canada, visit our website, www.statcan.gc.ca. You can also contact us by Email at [email protected] Telephone, from Monday to Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., at the following numbers: • Statistical Information Service 1-800-263-1136 • National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1-800-363-7629 • Fax line 1-514-283-9350 Depository Services Program • Inquiries line 1-800-635-7943 • Fax line 1-800-565-7757 Standards of service to the public Note of appreciation Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt, Canada owes the success of its statistical system to a reliable and courteous manner. To this end, Statistics Canada long-standing partnership between Statistics Canada, the has developed standards of service that its employees observe. citizens of Canada, its businesses, governments and other To obtain a copy of these service standards, please contact institutions. Accurate and timely statistical information Statistics Canada toll-free at 1-800-263-1136. The service could not be produced without their continued co-operation standards are also published on www.statcan.gc.ca under and goodwill. “Contact us” > “Standards of service to the public.” Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Industry, 2019 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the 3I+E Framework to Assess Provincial Policy Decisions for the Sale of Cannabis in Ontario, Saskatchewan and Quebec
    Health Policy and Practice Original Research https://doi.org/10.33137/utjph.v2i1.34726 USING THE 3I+E FRAMEWORK TO ASSESS PROVINCIAL POLICY DECISIONS FOR THE SALE OF CANNABIS IN ONTARIO, SASKATCHEWAN AND QUEBEC Ravinder Sandhu1, Guneet Saini1 and Elizabeth Alvarez1 1Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada Corresponding author: Ravinder Sandhu, [email protected] Abstract Objective: This paper examines policy decisions regarding public or private retail models chosen for the recreational use of cannabis in the provinces of Ontario, Saskatchewan and Quebec to demonstrate the application of the 3I+E framework for policy analysis. Methods: The 3I+E framework includes considerations of institutions, interests, ideas and external factors that play a role in adopting a particular policy. A retrospective comparative approach using this framework was conducted. Relevant newspaper articles, press releases, consultation reports and primary policy papers were reviewed. Results: The province of Ontario has a mixed model for the sale of recreational cannabis, while Saskatchewan’s recreational cannabis is fully private and retail in Quebec is through the public sector. Government institutions, particularly the party in power and the number of seats they hold, as well as existing policy legacies for alcohol retail, appeared to strongly influence the policy decisions in all three jurisdictions. Interest groups, including municipal and labor unions and private cannabis com- panies had a limited role in swaying government decisions toward a particular model. Beliefs and values of citizens regarding cannabis retail did not appear to play a significant role. In Ontario particularly, an external factor, namely a major political shift towards a conservative government had a large role in the mixed model chosen in the jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • CSE FORM 2A LISTING STATEMENT in Connection with the Listing Of
    CSE FORM 2A LISTING STATEMENT In connection with the listing of MJardin Group, Inc., the entity formed upon the reverse take-over of Sumtra Diversified Inc. by MJAR Holdings Corp. November 13, 2018 MJardin Group, Inc. currently derives substantially all of its current revenues from the cannabis industry in certain states of the United States, which industry is illegal under United States federal law. MJardin Group, Inc. is directly involved (through licensed parties with whom it contracts) in the cannabis industry in the United States where local state laws permit such activities. Currently, its customers are directly, and MJardin Group, Inc. is indirectly through the services provided to such clients, engaged in the manufacture, possession, use, sale or distribution of cannabis in the legal and regulated recreational and/or medicinal cannabis marketplace in the States of Colorado and Nevada. The United States federal government regulates drugs through the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 811), which places controlled substances, including cannabis, in a schedule. Cannabis is classified as a Schedule I drug. Under United States federal law, a Schedule I drug or substance has a high potential for abuse, no accepted medical use in the United States, and a lack of accepted safety for the use of the drug under medical supervision. The United States Food and Drug Administration has not approved cannabis as a safe and effective drug for any indication. In the United States, cannabis is largely regulated at the state level. State laws regulating cannabis are in direct conflict with the federal Controlled Substances Act, which makes cannabis use and possession federally illegal.
    [Show full text]
  • XLY AIF-2020.Pdf
    AUXLY CANNABIS GROUP INC. ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 April 23, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE TO READER .............................................................................................................................. 1 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ...................................................................................................... 1 CORPORATE STRUCTURE ...................................................................................................................... 4 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ......................................................................................... 5 Three Year History..................................................................................................................................... 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS ......................................................................................................... 17 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 17 Brand Portfolio ........................................................................................................................................ 17 Current Products ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Product Development ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Black Market to Blue Chip the Futures of the Cannabis Industry in Canada
    Black Market to Blue Chip The Futures of the Cannabis Industry in Canada By Calla Lee Submitted to OCAD University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Design in Strategic Foresight and Innovation Toronto, Ontario, Canada, April, 2018 © Calla Lee, 2018 Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this MRP. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize OCAD University to lend this MRP to other institutions or individu- als for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. I further authorize OCAD University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. Calla Lee ii Abstract The world is changing its mind on cannabis, and we are not in the same world we were in 1923 when Can- ada first made marijuana illegal to smoke. Culture, technology, knowledge, and people have changed. We have a lot more research, seen first-hand how cannabis can help and hurt people, and heard other’s similar and different stories. How do we apply what we’ve learned about strategy, business, and design to turn a prohibition policy into a regulatory framework? Legalization of cannabis in Canada has been delayed to after August, if all things go smoothly and there are no ad- ditional setbacks. Legalization creates a unique opportunity for Canada to become a global leader in innovation, policy, research, and regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis Guide for the USA & Canada
    Cannabis Guide for the USA & Canada January 2021 Cannabis Guide for the USA & Canada TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the Steering Committee .............................................................................. 3 About Meritas ........................................................................................................................... 4 USA United States (Federal) Overview .........5 Minnesota................................................ 71 American Indian and Missouri .................................................... 73 Alaska Native Tribes ................................7 Nevada .................................................... 77 Arizona ..................................................... 12 New Hampshire ..................................... 82 Arkansas .................................................. 17 New Jersey .............................................. 85 California ................................................. 20 New Mexico ............................................ 90 Colorado ................................................. 23 New York ................................................. 94 Delaware ................................................. 27 North Carolina ........................................ 99 Washington, D.C. ................................... 32 Oklahoma.............................................. 103 Florida ...................................................... 34 Oregon ................................................... 109 Georgia ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • APPA-Issue35 1..10
    First Session Première session de la Forty-second Parliament, 2015-16-17-18 quarante-deuxième législature, 2015-2016-2017-2018 Proceedings of the Standing Délibérations du Comité Senate Committee on sénatorial permanent des Aboriginal Peoples Peuples autochtones Chair: Présidente : The Honourable LILLIAN EVA DYCK L'honorable LILLIAN EVA DYCK Monday, March 26, 2018 Le lundi 26 mars 2018 Tuesday, March 27, 2018 Le mardi 27 mars 2018 Issue No. 35 Fascicule nº 35 Third meeting: Troisième réunion : Subject matter of Bill C-45, An Act respecting cannabis Teneur du projet de loi C-45, Loi concernant le cannabis et and to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, modifiant la Loi réglementant certaines drogues et the Criminal Code and other Acts, autres substances, le Code criminel et d'autres lois, insofar as it relates to the Indigenous peoples dans la mesure où il concerne les peuples autochtones of Canada du Canada and et First meeting: Première réunion : Bill C-70, An Act to give effect to the Agreement on Cree Projet de loi C-70, Loi portant mise en vigueur de l'Entente Nation Governance between the Crees of Eeyou Istchee sur la gouvernance de la nation crie entre les Cris d'Eeyou and the Government of Canada, to amend the Cree- Istchee et le gouvernement du Canada, modifiant la Loi sur Naskapi (of Quebec) Act and to make related and les Cris et les Naskapis du Québec et apportant des consequential amendments to other Acts modifications connexes et corrélatives à d'autres lois WITNESSES: TÉMOINS : (See back cover) (Voir à l'endos)
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis in Canada: a Best Practice Guide to Planning for the Legalization of Recreational Marijuana
    CANNABIS IN CANADA: A BEST PRACTICE GUIDE TO PLANNING FOR THE LEGALIZATION OF RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA by Alison M. Quigg BA, McGill University, 2015 A Major Research Paper presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Planning in Urban Development • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2018 © Alison M. Quigg, 2018 AUTHOR'S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A MRP I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this MRP. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this MRP to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. ii CANNABIS IN CANADA: A BEST PRACTICE GUIDE TO PLANNING FOR THE LEGALIZATION OF RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA © Alison Quigg, 2018 Master of Planning In Urban Development Ryerson University ABSTRACT When marijuana is legalized in Canada there will be land-use planning implications for municipalities. Different levels of government have different jurisdictional responsibilities regarding the legalization of recreational marijuana. One of the jurisdictional responsibilities of municipalities is land use planning and zoning. Two new land uses will be introduced to municipalities through the legalization of marijuana: recreational marijuana production facilities and recreational marijuana retail stores. For municipalities to control for the location of these uses, the land use legislation they enact must be able to co-exist with federal and provincial/territorial legislation and not result in any operational conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis Evidence Series, February 2, 2017
    Cannabis Evidence Series An Evidence Synthesis The Health Technology Assessment Unit, University of Calgary February 2, 2017 Cannabis Evidence Series February 2, 2017 Acknowledgements This report is authored by Laura E. Dowsett, Ally Memedovich, Hannah Holitzki, Laura Sevick, Sarah Ghali, Tamara McCarron, Stephanie Coward, Kelsey Brooks, Kai Lukowiak, Dolly Han, Vishva Danthurebandara, Diane Lorenzetti, Rebecca Haines-Saah, Tom Noseworthy, Eldon Spackman, and Fiona Clement on behalf of the HTA Unit at the University of Calgary. The authors declare no conflict of interests. This report was supported by a financial contribution from Alberta Health through the Alberta Health Technologies Decision Process, the Alberta model for health technology assessment (HTA) and policy analysis. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the official policy of Alberta Health. © 2016 Government of Alberta 2 Cannabis Evidence Series February 2, 2017 Issue Cannabis is the most widely used illicit drug in Canada; however, it is illegal to possess, produce or sell it 1. In 2015, the Liberal government of Canada formed a majority government and announced their plan to legalize cannabis. In June of 2016, a nine-member federal task force on cannabis was announced. The task force, chaired by Anne McLellan, includes representation from Quebec, British Columbia, Newfoundland and Labrador, Ontario, and Saskatchewan 2. Guided by this task force, cannabis legislation is expected to be introduced in 2017. Objective To inform Alberta’s response to the federal decision to legalize cannabis, the University of Calgary Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit is developing a series of evidence syntheses to support policy development by the Government of Alberta.
    [Show full text]