DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
En En Amendments European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 2016/0133(COD) 4.4.2017 AMENDMENTS 110 - 285 Draft report Cecilia Wikström (PE599.751v02-00) Establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast) Proposal for a regulation (COM(2016)0270 – C8-0173/2016 – 2016/0133(COD)) AM\1122579EN.docx PE602.906v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_LegReport PE602.906v01-00 2/138 AM\1122579EN.docx EN Amendment 110 Kristina Winberg Proposal for a regulation – Proposal for rejection The European Parliament rejects [the Commission proposal]. Or. en Amendment 111 Auke Zijlstra, Janice Atkinson, Harald Vilimsky, Gilles Lebreton Proposal for a regulation – Proposal for a regulation The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal. Or. nl Amendment 112 Raymond Finch, Beatrix von Storch Proposal for a regulation – Proposal for rejection The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal. Or. en Amendment 113 Beatrix von Storch Draft legislative resolution AM\1122579EN.docx 3/138 PE602.906v01-00 EN Citation 5 Draft legislative resolution Amendment — having regard to the opinion of the deleted European Economic and Social Committee of 19 October 20161 , _________________ 1 OJ C 34, 2.2.2017, p. 144. Or. en Justification The European Economic and Social Committee is an "advisory" body whose remit overlaps that of others and which little evidence exists to suggest that it alters policy. Therefore it should be abolished. In order to facilitate this the EU-Parliament should ignore its opinion thereby rendering it partially de facto abolished. Amendment 114 Beatrix von Storch Draft legislative resolution Citation 6 Draft legislative resolution Amendment — having regard to the opinion of the deleted Committee of the Regions of 8 December 20162 , _________________ 2 Not yet published in the Official Journal. Or. en Justification Given the increased role of the EU-Parliament in the legislative procedure, the intended role of the Committee of Regions in shaping EU legislation is no longer valid and therefore it should be abolished. In order to facilitate this the EU-Parliament should ignore its opinion thereby rendering it partially de facto abolished. Amendment 115 Cécile Kashetu Kyenge, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Silvia Costa, Nikos Androulakis PE602.906v01-00 4/138 AM\1122579EN.docx EN Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Having regard to the Treaty on the Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 78(2)(e) thereof, particular Article 67(2) and 78(2)(e) thereof, Or. en Justification It is important to remind the principle of solidarity and also that the stateless persons shall be treated as third- country nationals. Amendment 116 Cécile Kashetu Kyenge, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Silvia Costa, Nikos Androulakis Proposal for a regulation Citation 2 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Having regard to the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights, and in particular Article 18 thereof; Or. en Justification The right of asylum shall be guaranteed with due respect for the rules of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 and the Protocol of 31 January 1967 relating to the status of refugees. Amendment 117 Lorenzo Fontana Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1a) It should be reiterated that the AM\1122579EN.docx 5/138 PE602.906v01-00 EN much-celebrated European solidarity, articulated through the mechanism of asylum based on the Dublin rules and the corrective measures put in place in recent years (the relocation measures are an excellent example), has been a huge failure. If the Member States decide for legitimate reasons not to implement or honour fully and effectively a plan for sharing out the responsibilities and burdens associated with asylum, we must bravely acknowledge that the EU’s migration policy has failed. As a result, migration policy should no longer be set in Brussels and should therefore return to being under the exclusive jurisdiction of the individual Member States. Or. it Justification It is essential, so as not to delay the status quo or further worsen the situation, for the regulation proposal to clearly state that if there is no common desire to cooperate and resolve this problem (as demonstrated by the facts), the EU’s strategy cannot be to continue deceiving and misleading European citizens with grand proclamations that do not lead to tangible results. Amendment 118 Lorenzo Fontana Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) A common policy on asylum, (2) An effective common policy on including a Common European Asylum asylum, including a Common European System (CEAS), is a constituent part of the Asylum System (CEAS), can be a European Union’s objective of constituent part of the European Union’s progressively establishing an area of objective of progressively establishing an freedom, security and justice open to those area of freedom, security and justice open who, forced by circumstances, legitimately to those who seek asylum in the Union. seek protection in the Union. Or. it PE602.906v01-00 6/138 AM\1122579EN.docx EN Justification As shown clearly and empirically by the case in Italy, the percentage of those who meet the requirements for legitimately seeking asylum is a small minority compared with the total number of arrivals. So I am asking that the text be reworded, as the terms “forced by circumstances” and “legitimately seek protection” otherwise make it rather partisan. Amendment 119 Lorenzo Fontana Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (3) The European Council, at its deleted special meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999, agreed to work towards establishing the CEAS, based on the full and inclusive application of the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951, as supplemented by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 (‘the Geneva Convention’), thus ensuring that nobody is sent back to persecution, i.e. maintaining the principle of non- refoulement. In this respect, and without the responsibility criteria laid down in this Regulation being affected, Member States, all respecting the principle of non- refoulement, are considered as safe countries for third-country nationals. Or. it Justification The principle of non-refoulement is a dated principle which should be reviewed. Indeed, it is a counter-productive principle for both parties involved, insofar as it encourages those who do not have the right to asylum to leave their countries too, and leads to and exacerbates the endangerment and death of many migrants. The Australian case has shown us that adopting a policy of refoulement drastically reduces the number of deaths at sea and leaves legal immigration as the only viable option. Amendment 120 AM\1122579EN.docx 7/138 PE602.906v01-00 EN Beatrix von Storch Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (3) The European Council, at its deleted special meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999, agreed to work towards establishing the CEAS, based on the full and inclusive application of the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951, as supplemented by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 (‘the Geneva Convention’), thus ensuring that nobody is sent back to persecution, i.e. maintaining the principle of non- refoulement. In this respect, and without the responsibility criteria laid down in this Regulation being affected, Member States, all respecting the principle of non- refoulement, are considered as safe countries for third-country nationals. Or. en Justification The Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951, as amended by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 (Geneva Convention) has not been sufficiently updated and reformed for the modern context and therefore should be amended before it is considered as a foundation for legislation in this area. Amendment 121 Salvatore Domenico Pogliese, Alessandra Mussolini Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (5) Such a method should be based on (5) Such a method should be based on objective, fair criteria both for the Member objective, fair criteria both for the Member States and for the persons concerned. It States and for the persons concerned. It should, in particular, make it possible to should, in particular, make it possible to determine rapidly the Member State determine rapidly the Member State PE602.906v01-00 8/138 AM\1122579EN.docx EN responsible, so as to guarantee effective responsible, on behalf of the European access to the procedures for granting Union, so as to guarantee effective access international protection and not to to the procedures for granting international compromise the objective of the rapid protection and not to compromise the processing of applications for international objective of the rapid processing of protection. applications for international protection. Or. it Justification We feel we should point out that the actions taken by the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection fall under the Common European Asylum System and are, therefore, carried out in the general interest of the entire European Union. Amendment 122 Cécile Kashetu Kyenge, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Silvia Costa, Nikos Androulakis Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (5) Such a method should be based on (5) Such a method should be based on objective, fair criteria both for the Member the principle of solidarity and objective, States and for the persons concerned. It fair criteria both for the Member States and should, in particular, make it possible to for the persons concerned.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments 7
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Constitutional Affairs 2020/2098(REG) 24.9.2020 AMENDMENTS 7 - 43 Draft report Gabriele Bischoff (PE654.009v01-00) Amendments to the Rules of Procedure in order to ensure the functioning of Parliament in extraordinary circumstances (2020/2098(REG)) AM\1214113EN.docx PE657.438v02-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_RulesReport PE657.438v02-00 2/64 AM\1214113EN.docx EN Amendment 7 László Trócsányi, Andrea Bocskor, Andor Deli, Tamás Deutsch, Lívia Járóka, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri, György Hölvényi, Balázs Hidvéghi, Edina Tóth, József Szájer, Ádám Kósa Proposal for a decision Citation -1 (new) Proposal for a decision Amendment -1 having regard to Parliament's roles, functions and competences laid down in the Treaties, Or. en Amendment 8 László Trócsányi, Lívia Járóka, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri, György Hölvényi, Balázs Hidvéghi, Edina Tóth, József Szájer, Ádám Kósa, Andrea Bocskor, Andor Deli, Tamás Deutsch Proposal for a decision Citation -1 a (new) Proposal for a decision Amendment -1a having regard to the primary obligation of the institutions of the European Union to safeguard the rule of law also in their own functioning, Or. en Amendment 9 László Trócsányi, Andrea Bocskor, Andor Deli, Tamás Deutsch, Lívia Járóka, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri, György Hölvényi, Balázs Hidvéghi, Edina Tóth, József Szájer, Ádám Kósa Proposal for a decision Citation -1 b (new) Proposal for a decision Amendment -1b having regard to the rights of persons with disabilities and to the AM\1214113EN.docx 3/64 PE657.438v02-00 EN European Parliament resolution of 7 July 2016 on the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, with special regard to the Concluding Observations of the UN CRPD Committee1a ; _________________ 1a OJ C 101, 16.3.2018, p.
    [Show full text]
  • EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende Und Deren Stellvertreter*Innen Auf Den Konstituierenden Sitzungen Am Mittwoch, 10
    EU-Parlament: Ausschussvorsitzende und deren Stellvertreter*innen Auf den konstituierenden Sitzungen am Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2019, haben die siebenundzwanzig permanenten Ausschüsse des EU-Parlaments ihre Vorsitzenden und Stellvertreter*innen gewählt. Nachfolgend die Ergebnisse (Reihenfolge analog zur Auflistung auf den Seiten des Europäischen Parlaments): Ausschuss Vorsitzender Stellvertreter Witold Jan WASZCZYKOEDKI (ECR, PL) AFET Urmas PAET (Renew, EE) David McALLISTER (EPP, DE) Auswärtige Angelegenheiten Sergei STANISHEV (S&D, BG) Željana ZOVKO (EPP, HR) Bernard GUETTA (Renew, FR) DROI Hannah NEUMANN (Greens/EFA, DE) Marie ARENA (S&D, BE) Menschenrechte Christian SAGARTZ (EPP, AT) Raphael GLUCKSMANN (S&D, FR) Nikos ANDROULAKIS (S&D, EL) SEDE Kinga GÁL (EPP, HU) Nathalie LOISEAU (RE, FR) Sicherheit und Verteidigung Özlem DEMIREL (GUE/NGL, DE) Lukas MANDL (EPP, AT) Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA (Greens/EFA, DE) DEVE Norbert NEUSER (S&D, DE) Tomas TOBÉ (EPP, SE) Entwicklung Chrysoula ZACHAROPOULOU (RE, FR) Erik MARQUARDT (Greens/EFA, DE) Seite 1 14.01.2021 Jan ZAHRADIL (ECR, CZ) INTA Iuliu WINKLER (EPP, RO) Bernd LANGE (S&D, DE) Internationaler Handel Anna-Michelle ASIMAKOPOULOU (EPP, EL) Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE (RE, FR) Janusz LEWANDOWSKI (EPP, PL) BUDG Oliver CHASTEL (RE, BE) Johan VAN OVERTVELDT (ECR, BE) Haushalt Margarida MARQUES (S&D, PT) Niclas HERBST (EPP, DE) Isabel GARCÍA MUÑOZ (S&D, ES) CONT Caterina CHINNICI (S&D, IT) Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) Haushaltskontrolle Martina DLABAJOVÁ (RE, CZ) Tamás DEUTSCH (EPP, HU) Luděk NIEDERMAYER
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Xm Xm Report
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting A8-0250/2018 4.7.2018 REPORT on a proposal calling on the Council to determine, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded (2017/2131(INL)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Judith Sargentini (Initiative – Rule 45 and 52 of the Rules of Procedure) RR\1158298XM.docx PE620.837v02-00 XM United in diversity XM PR_INL CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ............................................ 3 ANNEX TO THE MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION .............. 7 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 33 ANNEX: LIST OF ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT ........................................................................................................... 36 MINORITY OPINION ............................................................................................................ 38 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETARY CONTROL ..................................... 39 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE AND EDUCATION .............................. 46 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS .............................. 53 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS AND GENDER EQUALITY 59 INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ................................ 69 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL
    [Show full text]
  • Report on an Aviation Strategy for Europe
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting A8-0021/2017 2.2.2017 REPORT on an Aviation Strategy for Europe (2016/2062(INI)) Committee on Transport and Tourism Rapporteur: Pavel Telička Rapporteur for the opinion (*): Ole Christensen, Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (*) Associated committee – Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure RR\1116370EN.docx PE589.131v02-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_INI PE589.131v02-00 2/40 RR\1116370EN.docx EN CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ............................................ 4 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 16 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS (*) ...... 24 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY ....................................................................................................................... 31 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ......................................................................................................................... 35 RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ........................................... 40 (*) Associated committee – Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure RR\1116370EN.docx 3/40 PE589.131v02-00 EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on an Aviation Strategy for Europe (2016/2062(INI)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the Commission communication of 7 December 2015 entitled ‘An Aviation Strategy for Europe’
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report
    SPECIAL REPORT Key points for the 8th term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) Madrid, November 2014 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO KEY POINTS FOR THE 8TH TERM OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2014-2019) 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2. THE LATEST ELECTION The European Parliament has, since its creation in 1962 in the 3. MAIN ISSUES IN THE context of the evolution of European integration, become the LEGISLATIVE AGENDA European Union (EU) Institution to have gained more power and 4. SPANISH DELEGATION relevance in the decision-making process of the Union. Indeed, over the years, it has gained increasingly important powers, legitimized 5. CONCLUSIONS and differentiated by the fact that it is the only EU Institution to be 6. APPENDIX 1: COMPETENCES elected by universal suffrage. 7. APPENDIX 2: CURRENT COMPOSITION OF THE It has evolved from being a mere advisory body to having the COMMITTEES power to co-legislate, together with the Council, in more than 85 legislative areas, exercising legislative powers as well as powers 8. APPENDIX 3: THE CURRENT of budgetary and political control. It also wields a considerable BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN amount of political influence, and its competences include those PARLIAMENT of electing the President of the European Commission, vetoing the 9. APPENDIX 4: EUROPEAN appointment of the College, and even forcing the resignation of the PARLIAMENT DELEGATIONS entire Commission after a motion of no confidence. AUTHORS The official headquarters of the Parliament are in Strasbourg, where the main plenary sessions are held.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members
    Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean Members David Maria SASSOLI Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Italy Partito Democratico Asim ADEMOV Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Bulgaria Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria Alex AGIUS SALIBA Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Malta Partit Laburista François ALFONSI Member Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance France Régions et Peuples Solidaires Malik AZMANI Member Renew Europe Group Netherlands Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie Nicolas BAY Member Identity and Democracy Group France Rassemblement national Tiziana BEGHIN Member Non-attached Members Italy Movimento 5 Stelle François-Xavier BELLAMY Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) France Les Républicains Sergio BERLATO Member European Conservatives and Reformists Group Italy Fratelli d'Italia Manuel BOMPARD Member The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL France La France Insoumise 24/09/2021 1 Sylvie BRUNET Member Renew Europe Group France Mouvement Démocrate Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA Member European Conservatives and Reformists Group Spain VOX Catherine CHABAUD Member Renew Europe Group France Mouvement Démocrate Nathalie COLIN-OESTERLÉ Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) France Les centristes Gilbert COLLARD Member Identity and Democracy Group France Rassemblement national
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Made Simple
    THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT MADE SIMPLE 2014-2019 The European Parliament Made Simple is produced by the American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) as a introduction to the workings of the European Parliament for amateurs and experts alike. Production Team Editor and project manager Giovanni Mastrobuono Senior Communications Officer Editorial assistance Alexandrine Gauvin Communications Officer Eli Corso-Phinney Communications Intern The information contained in this publication has been compiled in good faith and is accurate according to the most recent sources available at the time of going to press. Photographs used with the kind permission of the Audiovisual Libraries of the European Commission, Council of the European Union and the European Parliament. First edition, 2014 ISBN: 978-2-9146856-7-2 Printed in Belgium American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Avenue des Arts 53, B-1000 Brussels Telephone: +32 (0)2 513 68 92 Fax: +32 (0)2 513 79 28 [email protected] www.amchameu.eu Foreword Susan Danger Managing Director American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union t is with great pleasure that I present AmCham EU’s newest guide, The European Parliament Made Simple. The Lisbon Treaty, signed in 2009, gave the European Parliament greater power in EU Idecision-making and an increased role in selecting and approving the European Commission. As a result, this year’s European election has a greater democratic influence than ever before. With this in mind, AmCham EU has published The European Parliament Made Simple to explain the Parliament’s expanded powers and roles, for both the Brussels policy community and public affairs professionals in the EU and US.
    [Show full text]
  • De 26 Nederlanders in Het Europees Parlement 2
    De 26 Nederlanders in het Europees Parlement 2 Verklaring symbolen Telefoonnummer Brussel Telefoonnummers in Nederland en andere lidstaten GSM GSM Brussel Informatie in deze brochure is bijgewerkt tot februari 2013 DE 26 NEDERLANDERS IN HET EUROPEES PARLEMENT 3 Inhoudsopgave Biografieën 4 Contactgegevens Europarlementariërs 17 Voorlichters 21 Parlementaire commissies 23 Hoe werkt het Europees Parlement? 25 Zetelverdeling 26 Bezoeken 27 Adressen 28 Vergaderdata 29 DE 26 NEDERLANDERS IN HET EUROPEES PARLEMENT 4 In dit boekje vindt u de namen en contactgegevens van de 26 Nederlandse leden van het Europees Parlement. De Europarlementariërs van het CDA maken deel uit CDA van de fractie van de Europese Volkspartij (Christen- Democraten) (EVP) Wim van de Camp (delegatieleider) Geboren 27-07-1953 te Oss. Hogere Landbouwschool voor Tropische Landbouw en studie Rechten aan de Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen. Juridisch beleidsmedewerker bij de VNG (1982-1986). Lid van de Tweede Kamer (1986 -2009). Lid van het EP sinds 2009. Lid van de Commissie burgerlijke vrijheden, justitie en binnenlandse zaken. Plv. lid van de Commissie interne markt en consumentenbescherming. Plv. lid van de Bijzondere Commissie georganiseerde misdaad, corruptie en witwassen. Plv. lid van de Subcommissie mensenrechten. Lid van de delegatie voor de betrekkingen met de Volksrepubliek China. Plv. lid van de delegatie voor de betrekkingen met Albanië, Bosnië-Herzegovina, Servië, Montenegro en Kosovo. Esther de Lange Geboren 19-02-1975 te Spaubeek. Studie Hogere Europese Beroepsopleiding en Internationale Betrekkingen. Projectmedewerker FEANTSA (Europese federatie van dak- en thuislozenorganisaties) (1997). Medewerker Europese zaken twee Duitse brancheverenigingen (1998-1999). Beleidsmedewerker Europarlementariër (1999-2007). Voorzitter werkveldcommissie Hogere Europese Beroepen Opleiding, Hogeschool Zuyd, Maastricht (sinds 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Roll-Call Votes
    Results of roll-call votes Contents 1. Conclusion of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam - 2018/0356(NLE) - Pietro Bartolo....................................... 2 1.1. Final vote on the adoption of draft opinion ............................................................. 2 2. Conclusion of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam - 2018/0356M(NLE) - Pietro Bartolo ................................... 2 2.1. Final vote on the adoption of draft opinion ............................................................. 2 3. 2018 discharge: European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) - 2019/2085(DEC) - Nicolás González Casares ....................................................................................................... 3 3.1. Final vote on the adoption of draft opinion ............................................................. 3 Key to symbols: + : in favour - : against 0 : abstention 1 1. Conclusion of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam - 2018/0356(NLE) - Pietro Bartolo 1.1. Final vote on the adoption of draft opinion 17 + ECR Bert-Jan Ruissen, Ruža Tomašić PPE Peter van Dalen, Niclas Herbst, Jeroen Lenaers, Francisco José Millán Mon, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar, Maria Walsh, Theodoros Zagorakis RENEW Chris Davies, Pierre Karleskind S&D Clara Aguilera, Pietro Bartolo, Richard Corbett, Nicolás González Casares, Predrag Fred Matić, Manuel Pizarro 6 - GUE/NGL João Ferreira NI
    [Show full text]