Sea Mines and Naval Mine Countermeasures: Are Autonomous Underwater Vehicles the Answer, and Is the Royal Canadian Navy Ready for the New Paradigm?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sea Mines and Naval Mine Countermeasures: Are Autonomous Underwater Vehicles the Answer, and Is the Royal Canadian Navy Ready for the New Paradigm? SEA MINES AND NAVAL MINE COUNTERMEASURES: ARE AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLES THE ANSWER, AND IS THE ROYAL CANADIAN NAVY READY FOR THE NEW PARADIGM? Lieutenant-Commander J. Greenlaw JCSP 39 PCEMI 39 Master of Defence Studies Maîtrise en études de la défense Disclaimer Avertissement Opinions expressed remain those of the author and do Les opinons exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs et not represent Department of National Defence or ne reflètent aucunement des politiques du Ministère de Canadian Forces policy. This paper may not be used la Défense nationale ou des Forces canadiennes. Ce without written permission. papier ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation écrite. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, représentée par le Minister of National Defence, 2013 ministre de la Défense nationale, 2013. CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE – COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES JCSP 39 – PCEMI 39 2012 – 2013 MASTER OF DEFENCE STUDIES - MAITRISE EN ÉTUDES DE LA DÉFENSE SEA MINES AND NAVAL MINE COUNTERMEASURES: ARE AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLES THE ANSWER, AND IS THE ROYAL CANADIAN NAVY READY FOR THE NEW PARADIGM? By Lieutenant-Commander J. Greenlaw, RCN Par capitaine de corvette J. Greenlaw, MRC This paper was written by a student La présente étude a été rédigée par attending the Canadian Forces un stagiaire du Collège des Forces College in fulfilment of one of the canadiennes pour satisfaire à l'une requirements of the Course of des exigences du cours. L'étude est Studies. The paper is a scholastic un document qui se rapporte au document, and thus contains facts cours et contient donc des faits et des and opinions, which the author opinions que seul l'auteur considère alone considered appropriate and appropriés et convenables au sujet. correct for the subject. It does not Elle ne reflète pas nécessairement la necessarily reflect the policy or the politique ou l'opinion d'un opinion of any agency, including the organisme quelconque, y compris le Government of Canada and the gouvernement du Canada et le Canadian Department of National ministère de la Défense nationale du Defence. This paper may not be Canada. Il est défendu de diffuser, released, quoted or copied, except de citer ou de reproduire cette étude with the express permission of the sans la permission expresse du Canadian Department of National ministère de la Défense nationale. Defence. Compte de mots: 19 887 Word Count: 19 887 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i LIST OF FIGURES ii LIST OF TABLES iv ABSTRACT v CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION 1 OPERATIONAL VIGNETTES 2 INTRODUCTION 5 CHAPTER TWO – THE THREAT 14 THE SEA MINE AND ITS HISTORY 14 SEA MINE TYPES 22 NAVAL MINE WARFARE PRINCIPLES 32 CHAPTER THREE - NAVAL MINE 36 COUNTERMEASURES NMCM OPERATIONS 36 THE NMCM CHALLENGE 44 CHAPTER FOUR - UNMANNED SYSTEMS 53 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV) 55 UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLES (UGV) 62 MARITIME UNMANNED SYSTEMS (MUS) 68 CHAPTER FIVE - UNMANNED UNDERWATER 75 VEHICLES WHY UNMANNED? 75 REMOTELY OPERATED VEHICLES 78 AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLES 88 CHAPTER SIX - CONCLUSION 114 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 119 BIBLIOGRAPHY 122 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - The Role of the RCN 2 Figure 2 - Iraqi Sea Mines 7 Figure 3 - Legacy Sea Mine 21 Figure 4 - Iraqi Minelayer 22 Figure 5 - Libyan Sea Mine 24 Figure 6 - Rising Sea Mine 26 Figure 7 - Bottom Sea Mines 27 Figure 8 - Layered Defence 30 Figure 9 - Mine Warfare Family Tree 38 Figure 10 - USN Marine Mammals 40 Figure 11 - Air NMCM 42 Figure 12 - Clearance Diving 43 Figure 13 - USN Sea Mine Casualties 45 Figure 14 - Repair Cost versus Sea Mine Cost 46 Figure 15 - The Vicious NMCM Cycle 47 Figure 16 - Unmanned Systems Family Tree 55 Figure 17 - US DoD Budget for Unmanned Systems 56 Figure 18 - UAVs operated by the CAF 61 Figure 19 - Canadian Army UGVs 63 Figure 20 - US Military UGV Family of Systems 67 Figure 21 - RCN USV Targets 71 Figure 22 – DORADO Minehunting USV 73 Figure 23 - RMS TDP 74 Figure 24 - UUV Concept 76 Figure 25 - RCN ROVs 83 Figure 26 - ROV Operations 84 Figure 27 - Expendable Mine Disposal Systems 87 iii Figure 28 - AUV Sonar Image 93 Figure 29 - Cost Benefit of AUVs 94 Figure 30 - Various AUV Systems 99 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - Sea Mine Summary 31 Table 2 - Available COTS AUVS 100 v ABSTRACT In an era where sea mines are less expensive, becoming more sophisticated, and more assessable to rogue nations and non-state actors, the Royal Canadian Navy will be required to search, detect, classify and dispose of these weapons which can have a significant impact on its ability to manoeuvre. When operating in an environment with a credible sea mine threat, this deficiency may prevent the RCN from achieving its primary strategic goal, which is one of Global Deployable Sea Control. Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV) possess the potential to provide the RCN with a cost effective capability to counter the sea mine threat, and at the same time, reduce the risk to its maritime forces and personnel. In acquisition of these unmanned systems, the RCN can take advantage of these emerging technologies by integrating AUVs into the future fleet in order to address future sea mine threats. In arguing that AUVs are the most efficient option to re-introduce a full NMCM capability into the RCN, this paper will conduct a review of the sea mine threat, and a summary of NMCM as a naval warfare discipline. As with any new combat system or operational capability, the acquisition of AUVs into the Navy will undoubtedly come with numerous challenges to overcome. The paper will review some of the potential challenges that relate to personnel and training; technology; interoperability; and legal factors. Finally, by identifying significant key issues, future roles, potential challenges and lessons learned; it is hoped that this paper will assist in any future RCN AUV acquisition, which will enable the RCN to meet its assigned roles in the domestic, continental, and international operating environments. 1 CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Whoever can hold the sea has command of everything.1 -Themistocles (524-460 B.C.) In an era where sea mines are less expensive, becoming more sophisticated and more assessable to rogue nations and non-state actors; the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) will be required to be able to search, detect, classify and dispose of these weapons which can have a significant impact on its ability to manoeuvre. When operating in an environment with a credible sea mine threat, this deficiency may prevent the RCN from achieving its primary strategic goal, which is one of Global Deployable Sea Control.2 Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV) possess the potential to provide the RCN with a cost effective capability to counter the sea mine threat, and at the same time, reduce the risk to its maritime forces and personnel. In acquisition of these unmanned systems, the RCN can take advantage of these emerging technologies by integrating AUVs into the future fleet in order to address future sea mine threats. 1 John Bartlett, Bartlett’s Familiar Quotations, 16th Ed, ed. Justin Kaplan (Boston: Little Brown, 1992), 62. 2 Department of National Defence, Horizon 2050: A Strategic Maritime Concept for the Canadian Forces (Ottawa: DND, 2012), 14. 2 OPERATIONAL VIGNETTES The RCN's strategic documents: Leadmark 2020 and Securing Canada's Ocean Frontiers: Charting the Course from Leadmark; both define three roles of the RCN as being: military; diplomatic; and constabulary. It is also recognized that in the modern context, the RCN will rarely conduct these three roles in isolation, and that the application and overlap of these three roles describes the central theory of naval strategy, which is referred to as Use of the Seas or Sea Control.3 Figure 1 - The Role of the RCN. Source: Leadmark: The Navy’s Strategy for 2020.4 3 Department of National Defence, Securing Canada’s Ocean Frontiers: Charting the Course from Leadmark (Ottawa: DND, 2005), 18. 4 Department of National Defence, Leadmark: The Navy’s Strategy for 2020 (Ottawa: DND, 2001), 34. 3 It is within the context of these naval roles that the following vignettes were developed from current and past RCN operations. It should be noted that the insertion of AUVs should not be considered as overly futuristic or even as a new concept; however to the RCN the employment of AUVs will enable a new paradigm in Canadian maritime operations. Scenario 1 The Canadian Naval Task Group is deployed to the Caribbean, to conduct humanitarian relief operations, as a result of a natural disaster. Due to significant underwater obstructions and damage to the main port facilities, the humanitarian and disaster relief supplies are unable to be disembarked. Naval clearance divers deploy man-portable AUVs from small craft in order to survey the underwater damage. This aids in underwater salvage operations in order to open the port to relief supplies. This contribution earns significant diplomatic visibility for Canada.5 Scenario 2 The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) has been tasked to support the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) during a major domestic security event in 5 Naval Clearance Divers were deployed to the US Gulf Coast as part of Hurricane Katrina relief (OPERATION UNISON 2005), where they conducted underwater search and salvage operations. Department of Nation Defence, “OPERATION UNISON,” assessed on 13 January 2013, http://www.cjoc.forces.gc.ca/cont/unison/index-eng.asp. 4 Vancouver. The RCMP has received a report that a potential Maritime Improvised Explosive Device (MIED)6 has been laid in the vicinity of Vancouver Harbour. With the port closed to commercial and civilian traffic, the RCN deploys its Naval Mine Countermeasures (NMCM) team.
Recommended publications
  • '.L~:'I~' ,,:':;'.' ' ,:' Of.Prob1ems Concerning Wages, Hours, and Other Terms and Conditions of Elltploymejlt of the Employees of the Oi Ty of San Anselmo ' Ffi ("
    {,~: ."4 ~' '--'~:': l~~'~"!"'-I,~;;-~~~;::'~ ':',~ .. '~":;';/Ie~-.:~~:r;:~~~"~",:,-"'" i ~ T:·:;i~:0J~~~W~T1.W_Yrl'!'ft""t;\:'l;~~ (} '. 'C":'~ ..... I$soliir,ifit~IS:' '. ~ 1417 Protest of massive t0wers: on resi,dential streets by Utility Oompany 1418 Claims & Demands - September, 1972 '. 1419 Support of Federal-Aid Urban System 1420 Request Marin County Board of Supervisors adopt Resolution requesting State Dept. of Public Works approve procedures for determining Fed. Aid-est. Fed. Aid Urban System Comm. 1421 Accepting e~sement for street purposes over and upon certain real property from Geo. C. & Lois J. Davison . 1422 Report of Cost & Assessment-San Francisco Blvd. between SFD & City Limits allowing payment of asse'ssments in installments. 1423 Opposition to Proposition 14 and urging its defeat in November 1424 Claims & Demands - October, 1972 1425 Setting Policy for orderly destruc~ion of records-City Clerk's Offioe & Finance , . Office 'r. vC t C"C-4•• ~ .. ' 1426 Authorizing agreement for the Purchase of Tax Deeded Property from County of Marine,) 1427 Acoeptance ,of improvements on a portion of Laurel Avenue (i:>c .zCc S'~(;-( 1428 Claims & Demands - November, 1972 1429 Transfer of territory in S.A.· owned by Robert B. Hamil ton & Mr. & Mrs. Harry Kupbens, to San, Rafael 1430 Fee for a Design Review application 1431 Claims & Demands - December, 1972 1432 Intention to Incur bonded indebtedness for acquisition of, Open Spaoe. Lands (Election­ 1433 Appointing speoial bond counsel and authorizing execution of agreement (Election)
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A. Navy Activity Descriptions
    Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing Draft EIS/OEIS June 2017 APPENDIX A Navy Activity Descriptions Appendix A Navy Activity Descriptions Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing Draft EIS/OEIS June 2017 This page intentionally left blank. Appendix A Navy Activity Descriptions Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing Draft EIS/OEIS June 2017 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing TABLE OF CONTENTS A. NAVY ACTIVITY DESCRIPTIONS ................................................................................................ A-1 A.1 Description of Sonar, Munitions, Targets, and Other Systems Employed in Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing Events .................................................................. A-1 A.1.1 Sonar Systems and Other Acoustic Sources ......................................................... A-1 A.1.2 Munitions .............................................................................................................. A-7 A.1.3 Targets ................................................................................................................ A-11 A.1.4 Defensive Countermeasures ............................................................................... A-13 A.1.5 Mine Warfare Systems ........................................................................................ A-13 A.1.6 Military Expended Materials ............................................................................... A-16 A.2 Training Activities ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Reporter and Engineering News
    MARITIME REPORTER AND ENGINEERING NEWS SiEST COAST SHIPYARDS The Maritime Prepositioning lip, Pfc Eugene A. Obregon, Built By Notional Steel & Shipbuilding U.S. Navy Ship Overhaul Market JULY 16, 1985 - An Update - (SEE PAGE 4) INTRODUCING THE EPOCH MARK D SERIES A new era in product oil carrier design. Hitachi Zosen has developed the EPOCH MARK n series which has a unique structure not found on conventional ship designs. Revolutionary in concept, the MARKII incorporates a unidirectional girder system combined with a complete double hull structure. While a ship's hull is customarily designed with a grillage of longitudinal and transverse members for strength, this system uses only longitudinal members in a double hull to provide sufficient strength. This unidirectional girder system results in unprecedented structural simplicity and completely flush surfaced cargo tank interior. MARKII product oil carriers provide unrivaled advantages in performances over more conventional designs. The EPOCH MARK n series is available in 40, 60 and 80 thousands dwt designs. And has won the approval of leading classification societies (ABS, BV, LR, NK, NV). At present The Superior Performance of the EPOCH MARK n Series: many worldwide patents are under application. Conventional EPOCH MARK Hitachi Zosen is also expanding this new structural system for the development of combination cargo carriers such as PROBO or Tank configuration OBO carriers other than oil tankers. Cargo/ballast segregation * kkk unloading time * •kkk Unloading efficiency stripping * kkk cleaning time * kkk Cargo tank cleaning completeness • kkk f" s:3 cargo tank * kkk Gas free 6 ballast tank ** ** 11 - Cargo tank heating * kkk Cargo purity * kkk cargo tank coating k kkk Maintenance ballast tank coating ** kk hull construction * kkk crack free ** kkk Safety stranding & collision * *** Excellent ** Good * Normal We build industries Hitachi Zosen HITACHI ZOSEN CORPORATION HITACHI ZOSEN INTERNATIONAL, S.A.: London: Winchester House, 77 London Wall.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Assessment of Amphibious Operations from 1941 to the Present
    CRM D0006297.A2/ Final July 2002 Charting the Pathway to OMFTS: A Historical Assessment of Amphibious Operations From 1941 to the Present Carter A. Malkasian 4825 Mark Center Drive • Alexandria, Virginia 22311-1850 Approved for distribution: July 2002 c.. Expedit'onaryyystems & Support Team Integrated Systems and Operations Division This document represents the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the Department of the Navy. Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Specific authority: N0014-00-D-0700. For copies of this document call: CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2123. Copyright 0 2002 The CNA Corporation Contents Summary . 1 Introduction . 5 Methodology . 6 The U.S. Marine Corps’ new concept for forcible entry . 9 What is the purpose of amphibious warfare? . 15 Amphibious warfare and the strategic level of war . 15 Amphibious warfare and the operational level of war . 17 Historical changes in amphibious warfare . 19 Amphibious warfare in World War II . 19 The strategic environment . 19 Operational doctrine development and refinement . 21 World War II assault and area denial tactics. 26 Amphibious warfare during the Cold War . 28 Changes to the strategic context . 29 New operational approaches to amphibious warfare . 33 Cold war assault and area denial tactics . 35 Amphibious warfare, 1983–2002 . 42 Changes in the strategic, operational, and tactical context of warfare. 42 Post-cold war amphibious tactics . 44 Conclusion . 46 Key factors in the success of OMFTS. 49 Operational pause . 49 The causes of operational pause . 49 i Overcoming enemy resistance and the supply buildup.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Sea Mines in the Indo-Pacific
    Issue 18, 2020 BREACHING THE SURFACE: THE FUTURE OF SEA MINES IN THE INDO-PACIFIC Alia Huberman, The Australian National Internships Program Issue 18, 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report argues that several dynamics of the coming few decades in the Indo-Pacific will see naval mines used once again in the region. It suggests they will form the basis of anti-access strategies for some Indo-Pacific states in a way that will be deeply transformative for the region’s strategic balance and for which Australia is thoroughly unprepared. It seeks to draw attention to the often- underappreciated nature of sea mines as a uniquely powerful strategic tool, offering the user an unparalleled asymmetric ability to engage high-value enemy targets while posing a minimal-risk, low- expense, and continuous threat. In the increasingly contested strategic environment of the contemporary Indo-Pacific - a region in which the threats to free navigation and the maritime economy are existential ones - there is considerable appetite for anti-access and sea denial weapons as defensive, offensive, and coercive tools. Naval strategists must,, prepare for the resurgence of mine warfare in the Indo-Pacific, and for the grand-scale and rapid timeline in which it can transform an operational environment. This report first seeks to collate and outline those characteristics of sea mines and of their interaction with an operational environment that make them attractive for use. It then discusses the states most likely to employ mine warfare and the different scenarios in which they might do so, presenting five individual contingencies: China, Taiwan, North Korea, non-state actors, and Southeast Asian states.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC LABORATORY SYSTEM %Vas
    UNIVERSITY - NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC LABORATORY SYSTEM ALVIN REVIEW COMMITTEE Summary Report of the June 26, 27, 1991 Meeting Carriage House Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA Minutes of the Meeting APPENDICES I. ALVIN Review Committee Roster II. Agenda III. Report on ALVIN Operations, 1990-1991 IV. Letter on Archiving Policy for ALVIN data and records V. 1991 Dive Requests by Region VI. Summary of 1992 Dive Requests VII. Opportunities for Oceanographic Research, DSV ALVIN, 1992 VIII. Rules for Review of ALVIN Dive Requests it as 111K . "? • %Vas- IILALtr CE D AUG 1 . ) 1991 I 1 UNOLS OFFICE ALVIN Review Committee Minutes of Meeting June 26, 27, 1991 Carriage House Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA OPENING THE MEETING The meeting was called at 8:00 a.m. by Feenan Jennings, ARC Chair. Committee members, funding agency representatives from NOAA, NSF and ONR, WHOI personnel and UNOLS Office staff present for all or part of the meeting: ALVIN Review Committee Agency Representatives Feenan Jennings, Chair David Duane, NOAA Casey Moore Don Heinrichs, NSF Doug Nelson Keith Kaulum, ONR Mary Scranton Gary Taghon Karen Von Damm Dick Pittenger, WHOI member WHOI UNOLS Office Craig Dorman Bill Barbee Barrie Walden Jack Bash Don Moller Annette DiSilva Rick Chandler Mary D'Andrea The ALVIN Review Committee Roster is Appendix I. Craig Dorman, Director, WHOI, welcomed the ALVIN Review Committee and introduced Dick Pittenger, whom he had earlier named as the WHOI (operating institution ex-officio) member on the ARC. Dr. Dorman reiterated WHOI's strong commitment to continue to manage and operate ALVIN in support of the United States' oceanographic program.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites Annual Report 2009 (April 2009 - March 2010)
    Department for Culture, Media and Sport Architecture and Historic Environment Division Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites Annual Report 2009 (April 2009 - March 2010) Compiled by English Heritage for the Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites. Text was also contributed by Cadw, Historic Scotland and the Environment and Heritage Service, Northern Ireland. s e vi a D n i t r a M © Contents ZONE ONE – Wreck Site Maps and Introduction UK Designated Shipwrecks Map ......................................................................................3 Scheduled and Listed Wreck Sites Map ..........................................................................4 Military Sites Map .................................................................................................................5 Foreword: Tom Hassall, ACHWS Chair ..........................................................................6 ZONE TWO – Case Studies on Protected Wreck Sites The Swash Channel, by Dave Parham and Paola Palma .....................................................................................8 Archiving the Historic Shipwreck Site of HMS Invincible, by Brandon Mason ............................................................................................................ 10 Recovery and Research of the Northumberland’s Chain Pump, by Daniel Pascoe ............................................................................................................... 14 Colossus Stores Ship? No! A Warship Being Lost? by Todd Stevens ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Mine Warfare Champion
    Naval War College Review Volume 68 Article 8 Number 2 Spring 2015 Wanted: U.S. Navy Mine Warfare Champion Scott .C Truver Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Truver, Scott .C (2015) "Wanted: U.S. Navy Mine Warfare Champion," Naval War College Review: Vol. 68 : No. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol68/iss2/8 This Additional Writing is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Truver: Wanted: U.S. Navy Mine Warfare Champion COMMENTARY WANTED U.S. NAVY MINE WARFARE CHAMPION Scott C. Truver Successfully implementing innovation within a bureaucracy ultimately requires a champion to navigate the inherently political processes of securing sponsorship and resourcing. This is just as important to the very small as to the very large programs, particularly during periods of fiscal austerity. “It’s fragmented,” com- mented retired rear admiral Paul Ryan, former commander of the U.S. Navy’s Mine Warfare Command, in April 2014. “There is no single champion for mine warfare.”1 This lack of support presents challenges for the U.S. Navy and the nation, as the service struggles to articulate, and to muster the necessary backing for, mine warfare (MIW) strategies, programs, capabilities, and capacities. The task of confronting these challenges is complicated by the fact that MIW comprises not only mine-countermeasures (MCM—that is, minesweeping and mine hunt- ing) systems and platforms but also mines that can be employed to defeat our adversaries’ naval strategies and forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Revitalizing Mine Countermeasure: Lessons from the Royal Navy In
    NAVAL MINE WARFARE ESSAY CONTEST—1ST PRIZE Sponsored by The Mine Warfare Association BY LIEUTENANT JOHN MILLER, REVITALIZE MINE U.S. NAVY COUNTERMEASURES The Royal Navy’s experience responding to mines in World War II offers lessons for today. RAYTHEON 48 PROCEEDINGS | AUGUST 2019 he U.S. Navy knows that its current adversaries pose a substantial offensive mining threat. Russia, China, and Iran each possess—and too often export—an advanced, ro- bust, and mature offensive mine capability. The U.S. Navy must consider if it has the T speed and resources with which to respond to restore freedom of maneuver in the event of sustained mining. The pre–World War II U.S. Navy had neither built a minesweeper nor swept a mine in its his- tory. It had zero minesweepers on the register of active ships in September 1939.1 In compar- ison, the Royal Navy had 76 fleet minesweepers.2 By the end of the war, more than 1,000 U.S. and Allied vessels had served as minesweepers, combating offensive mine operations from the Atlantic and the Mediterranean to the Far East. While some were purpose-built, many were commercial vessels, such as trawlers and drifters, pressed into service by the Royal Navy to support mine countermeasure (MCM), antisubmarine warfare (ASW), escort, and patrol mis- sions. Though lightly armed, these vessels played a vital role in combating and defeating ad- versaries across multiple warfare domains. By filling a critical capability gap, these ships and boats enabled the Royal Navy to effectively stretch its finite naval forces across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Naval Shipbuilding Enterprise
    AUSTRALIA’S NAVAL SHIPBUILDING ENTERPRISE Preparing for the 21st Century JOHN BIRKLER JOHN F. SCHANK MARK V. ARENA EDWARD G. KEATING JOEL B. PREDD JAMES BLACK IRINA DANESCU DAN JENKINS JAMES G. KALLIMANI GORDON T. LEE ROGER LOUGH ROBERT MURPHY DAVID NICHOLLS GIACOMO PERSI PAOLI DEBORAH PEETZ BRIAN PERKINSON JERRY M. SOLLINGER SHANE TIERNEY OBAID YOUNOSSI C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1093 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9029-4 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2015 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The Australian government will produce a new Defence White Paper in 2015 that will outline Australia’s strategic defense objectives and how those objectives will be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Survey of U.S. Shipbuilding and Repair Facilities 2001
    Report on Survey of U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime U.S. Shipbuilding and Administration Repair Facilities 2001 REPORT ON SURVEY OF U.S. SHIPBUILDING AND REPAIR FACILITIES 2001 Prepared By: Office of Shipbuilding and Marine Technology December 2001 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Overview of Major Shipbuilding and Repair Base ................................................ 5 Major U.S. Private Shipyards Summary Classification Definitions ....................... 6 Number of Shipyards by Type (Exhibit 1) ........................................................... 7 Number of Shipyards by Region (Exhibit 2) ........................................................ 8 Number of Shipyards by Type and Region (Exhibit 3) ........................................ 9 Number of Building Positions by Maximum Length Capability (Exhibit 4) ........... 10 Number of Build and Repair Positions (Exhibit 5) ............................................... 11 Number of Build and Repair Positions by Region (Exhibit 6) .............................. 12 Number of Floating Drydocks by Maximum Length Capability (Exhibit 7) .......... 13 Number of Production Workers by Shipyard Type (Exhibit 8) ............................. 14 Number of Production Workers by Region (Exhibit 9) ........................................ 15 Number of Production Workers: 1982 – 2001 (Exhibit 10) ................................. 16 Listing
    [Show full text]