Museological and Archaeological Studies in the Ottoman Empire During the Westernization Process in the 19Th Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Museological and Archaeological Studies in the Ottoman Empire During the Westernization Process in the 19Th Century MUSEOLOGICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE DURING THE WESTERNIZATION PROCESS IN THE 19TH CENTURY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY SELİN ADİLE ATLIMAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY DECEMBER 2008 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Prof. Dr. Seçil Karal Akgün Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Recep Boztemur Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Aykut Çınaroğlu (Ankara University, ARK) Prof. Dr. Seçil Karal Akgün (METU, HIST) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Recep Boztemur (METU, HIST) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: Selin Adile, Atlıman Signature : iii ABSTRACT MUSEOLOGICAL AND ARCHEOLOGICAL STUDIES IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE DURING THE WESTERNIZATION PROCESS IN THE 19TH CENTURY Atlıman, Selin Adile Master of Arts, History Thesis Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Recep Boztemur December 2008, 165 pages The nineteenth century is a period, when great transformations were experienced in the Ottoman Empire. Besides the political, economical and judicial changes, with the impact of the westernization process, important leaps about two important components of cultural life, museology and archeology, were realized in terms of both collecting and protecting the ancient monuments; and their exposition. As two interrelated fields of culture and sciences originated from Europe, museology and archeology were incorporated in the cultural life of the Ottoman Empire in the nineteenth century. The Ottoman Empire was acquainted with these two scientific fields through the impacts of both the museological studies in Europe and the excavations of the foreign researchers and archeologists, conducted within the imperial territories. This study aims to observe the emergence of museological and archeological studies in the Ottoman Empire and its development by the impacts of the West. In this study, the origins of the museological and archeological studies, the first attempts in the Ottoman Empire and the development in the continuing process and the judicial acts about the mentioned fields composed in the 19th century are examined chronologically. In this process of development, the works of Osman Hamdi Bey were forming an important part of this thesis. Key Words: Museology, Archeology, Westernization, Imperial Museum, Osman Hamdi Bey iv ÖZ 19. YÜZYIL OSMANLI İMPARATORLUĞU BATILILAŞMA SÜRECİNDE MÜZEOLOJİK VE ARKEOLOJİK ÇALIŞMALAR Atlıman, Selin Adile Yüksek Lisans, Tarih Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Doç. Dr. Recep Boztemur Aralık 2008, 165 sayfa 19. yüzyıl, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda büyük değişimlerin yaşandığı bir dönemdir. Bu yüzyıl içerisinde siyaset, ekonomi ve hukuk alanlarında önemli değişimler yaşanırken, bir taraftan da Batılılaşma sürecinin etkisiyle iki önemli kültür alanı olan müzecilik ve arkeoloji dallarında da hem eski eserleri saklayıp koruma hem de bu eserleri sergileme konularında önemli atılımlar gerçekleştirilmiştir. Müzecilik ve arkeoloji, Avrupa’da doğan birbiriyle bağlantılı iki kültür ve bilim alanı olarak Osmanlı İmparatorluğu kültür hayatına 19. yüzyılda girmiştir. Hem Avrupa’da yürütülen müzecilik çalışmalarının etkisiyle, hem de imparatorluk topraklarında kazı faaliyetlerinde bulunan yabancı uyruklu araştırmacı ve arkeologların etkisiyle Osmanlı İmparatorluğu bu bilim dallarıyla tanışmıştır. Bu çalışma, 19. yüzyıl Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda, müzecilik ve arkeoloji çalışmalarının nasıl başladığını ve Batı’nın da etkisiyle nasıl bir gelişme çizgisi izlediğini incelemektedir. Bu çalışmada, müzecilik ve arkeoloji çalışmalarının kökenleri ile Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’ndaki ilk çalışmalar ve devam eden süreç içerisindeki gelişmeler, 19. yüzyıl içerisinde sözü geçen konularda yapılan hukuki atılımlar kronolojik olarak incelenmektedir. Bu gelişme süreci içerisinde Osman Hamdi Bey’in çalışmaları bu tezin önemli bir kısmını teşkil etmektedir. v Anahtar Kelimeler: Müzecilik, Arkeoloji, Batılılaşma, İmparatorluk Müzesi, Osman Hamdi Bey vi To Bige and Nihat Atlıman vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Being the outcome of a one year long study, this thesis contains many contributions from various people to whom I would like to express my gratitude. First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Associate Professor Recep Boztemur. He not only encouraged and supported me in academic means, but also took close interest in my thesis and made valuable corrections, criticism and suggestions. He was always there to comfort me when I had doubts about the outcome. Thus, I am a proud student of Recep Boztemur who taught not only academic but also life lessons to me. I especially would like to thank Prof. Dr. Seçil Karal Akgün for two main causes. First, for accepting me to the department of History, by which I had the chance of learning a branch of science that was linked to archeology but had a different methodology. Second, for her constructive criticism and suggestions on my thesis, that made it possible for me to improve my work. I also would like to thank Dr. Tuğba Tanyeri Erdemir among the academic staff of METU for her guidance and her interest in my thesis. I am grateful to my professors in Ankara University, especially to Prof. Dr. Aykut Çınaroğlu whom I owe my archeological knowledge. In addition, I also owe a great deal to the whole academic staff of the METU History Department for being so polite and helpful whenever I knocked on their doors during my graduate studies. Elvin Otman, your comments and proof reading mattered greatly during the preparation of the thesis because you are the first person to read it. Umut Eren, thank you for your love and support in every step of my life. Finally I would like to thank my family and my dear friends for being there and supporting me. Without their presence in my life everything would be incomplete. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM...................................................................................................iii ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................iv ÖZ........................................................................................................................v DEDICATION..................................................................................................vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................viii TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................ix CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................1 2. MUSEOLOGICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE UNTIL 1881.................................................8 2.1. Museological Studies in the Ottoman Empire Until 1881…...……8 2.1.1. The First Examples of Museum in the World and the Development of Museology in Europe...….………….8 2.1.2. Pre-Museological Studies in the Ottoman Empire….…..16 2.1.3. Fethi Ahmet Pasha and the First Ottoman Museum….....20 2.1.4. Foreign Directors Period in the Museum…….……….....25 2.2. Archaeological Studies in the Ottoman Empire Until 1881……..32 2.2.1. First European Travelers and Researchers in the Ottoman Lands….............……………………………..36 2.2.2. Foreign Archaeological Excavations in Anatolia……...43 2.2.3. Foreign Archaeological Excavations in Holy Lands and Mesopotamia…………..................................……..48 ix 3. A PIONEER IN THE OTTOMAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND MUSEOLOGY: OSMAN HAMDİ BEY………………………..56 3.1. An Introduction to Osman Hamdi Bey……..………….…56 3.2. Education and Professional Life of Osman Hamdi Bey.....59 3.3. Osman Hamdi Bey as a Museologist………..……………61 3.4. Osman Hamdi Bey’s Contribution to the Museology….....70 3.5. Osman Hamdi Bey as an Archaeology Researcher …....…72 3.6. Osman Hamdi Bey’s Contribution to the Ancient Monument Law…………………..………………….....…79 3.7. Osman Hamdi Bey and the Academy of Fine Arts…....….84 3.8. Osman Hamdi Bey and the Exhibitions……....………..….90 3.9. Concluding Remarks……..…………….…………...…….93 4. MONUMENT LAWS IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: 1800-1906…...98 4.1. Introduction to the Regulations of Ancient Monuments….98 4.2. Regulation of 1869…….……………..…..……………...108 4.3. Regulation of 1874……………………….....…………...114 4.4. Regulation of 1884……….….……….……….……….....122 4.5. Regulation of 1906……….………………………..….…131 4.6. Concluding Remarks……….…………………………..…134 5. CONCLUSION……………….…………………..…………………....138 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………….………...146 APPENDICES……………………..……………………………….....156 APPENDIX 1……………………….…………………….….156 APPENDIX 2……………………….…………………….….157 APPENDIX 3……………………….………………………..158 APPENDIX 4……………………….………………………..159 APPENDIX 5……………………….………………………..160 APPENDIX 6…………………………………….…………..161 APPENDIX 7………………….……………………………..162 x APPENDIX 8……………………….…………………….…163 APPENDIX 9………………………………………………..164 APPENDIX 10………………………………………………165 xi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Archaeology, the basic source and
Recommended publications
  • The Protection of Historical Artifacts in Ottoman Empire: the Permanent Council for the Protection of Ancient Artifactsi
    Universal Journal of Educational Research 7(2): 600-608, 2019 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2019.070233 The Protection of Historical Artifacts in Ottoman Empire: The Permanent Council for the i Protection of Ancient Artifacts Sefa Yildirim*, Fatih Öztop Department of History, Faculty of Science and Letters, Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, Turkey Copyright©2019 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract The historical artifacts that reveal the social, establishment, functioning, duties and activities of the political, aesthetic, moral, architectural, etc. stages, before-said council are tried to be explained. through which the human beings have been; which transfer and reveal information from past to present and Keywords Historical Artifacts, Protection of future; which have an artistic, historical or archaeological Historical Artifacts, Council importance are very important physical elements that the present-day civilized societies protect or must protect as cultural values. Such works both strengthen the ties to the past due to the transfer of cultural heritage to existing and 1 . Introduction future generations and plays a very important role in the writing of the past through the data provided to the The first initiative for the protection of the historical researchers. The protection of the historical artifacts was artifacts in the Ottoman Empire can be considered as the under sharia laws until 1858 in Ottoman Empire, since beginning of the storage of two collections of old weapons then, some regulations were done about this issue, in the and artifacts since 1846 in the Hagia Irene Church end, The Permanent Council for the Protection of Ancient (Sertoğlu & Açık, 2013, p.160).
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Building Sites in Antiquity the Culture, Politics and Technology of Monumental Architecture
    ARCHAEOLOGY WORLDWIDE 2 • 2013 Magazine of the German Archaeological Institute Archaeology Worldwide – Volume two – Berlin, October – DAI 2013 TITLE STORY GIANT BUILDING SITES IN ANTIQUITY The culture, politics and technology of monumental architecture CULTURAL HERITAGE PORTRAIT INTERVIEW Turkey – Restoration work in the Brita Wagener – German IT construction sites in the Red Hall in Bergama ambassador in Baghdad archaeological sciences ARCHAEOLOGY WORLDWIDE Locations featured in this issue Turkey, Bergama. Cultural Heritage, page 12 Iraq, Uruk/Warka. Title Story, page 41, 46 Solomon Islands, West Pacific. Everyday Archaeology, page 18 Ukraine, Talianki. Title Story, page 48 Germany, Munich. Location, page 66 Italy, Rome/Castel Gandolfo. Title Story, page 52 Russia, North Caucasus. Landscape, page 26 Israel, Jerusalem. Title Story, page 55 Greece, Athens. The Object, page 30 Greece, Tiryns. Report, page 60 Berlin, Head Office of the German Archaeological Institute Lebanon, Baalbek. Title Story, page 36 COVER PHOTO At Baalbek, 45 million year old, weather- ing-resistant nummulitic limestone, which lies in thick shelves in the earth in this lo- cality, gained fame in monumental archi- tecture. It was just good enough for Jupiter and his gigantic temple. For columns that were 18 metres high the architects needed no more than three drums each; they measured 2.2 metres in diameter. The tem- ple podium is constructed of colossal lime- stone blocks that fit precisely together. The upper layer of the podium, today called the "trilithon", was never completed. Weighing up to 1,000 tons, these blocks are the big- gest known megaliths in history. DITORIAL E EDITORIAL DEAR READERS, You don't always need a crane or a bull- "only" the business of the master-builders dozer to do archaeological fieldwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Işgal Döneminde Izmir Metropoliti Hrisostomos (1919–1922)
    Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 31 Haziran 2009 Cilt 11 Sayı 1 (31-50) İŞGAL DÖNEMİNDE İZMİR METROPOLİTİ HRİSOSTOMOS (1919–1922) Yrd. Doç. Dr. Bülent ATALAY* ÖZET Yunanistan, Mondros Mütarekesi’ne rağmen İzmir’i işgal etti. İşgalin gerçekleşmesinde İzmir Metropoliti Hrisostomos’un faaliyetleri çok etkili oldu. Hrisostomos, Türklerin, Hıristiyanları katlettiklerine dair iddialar ileri sürdü. Bunu ispat etmek için de "Türklerin Hıristiyanlara Tecavüzleri" adında bir kitap hazırlayarak işgalci devletlerin temsilciliklerine dağıttı. Metropolit Hirsostomos faaliyetlerini İzmir metropolithanesi merkezli yürütmekteydi. İşgalinin ilk gününde Yunan askerlerini karşılayan Hrisostomos, aynı zamanda onları kutsayarak, Türkleri öldürmenin görev olduğunu belirti. Ermenilerin de desteğini alan Metropolit Hrisostomos, İzmir’deki Türklere işgal süresince zor anlar yaşattı. Asıl amaç İzmir’in Yunanistan’a bağlanmasını sağlamaktı. İzmir Valisi İzzet’in de yardımı ile Hrisostomos Türkleri baskı altında tutmaya çalıştı. Fakat Yunan kuvvetlerinin, Türk ordusu karşısında almaya başladığı mağlubiyet, Hrisostomos’un ümitlerini kırmaya başladı. Türk kuvvetleri 9 Eylül 1922’de İzmir’e girdiler. Nihayet 10 Eylül 1922 tarihiyle birlikte Hrisostomos için yolun sonu da gelmişti. İzmir’de yaşayan Türkler tarafından linç edildi. Anahtar Kelime: Metropolit, Hrisostomos, İzmir, Millî Mücadele IZMIR ARCHBISHOP HRISOSTOMOS DURING THE INVASION (1919-1922) ABSTRACT Greece occupied lamis despite the Mondros Agreement. The activities of Izmir Archbishop Hrisostomos became effective on the invasion. Hrisostomos clamied that Turks murdered Christians. In order to prove this claim, he wrote o book named “Turks’ Attacks against Christions” and distributed it to the representations of the allied powers. Hrisostomos who welcomed the Grek troops and blessed them commanded the troops to kill Turks. Hrisostomos who was supported by the Armanions caused to hard times for Turks during the invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Punishment and Violence in Education During the Last Century of the Ottoman Empire and the Early Years of the Republic
    Journal of Scientific Perspectives Volume 3, Supplement Issue 2019: 1st Understanding Violence Congress, pp. 73-80 E - ISSN: 2587-3008 URL: https://ratingacademy.com.tr/ojs/index.php/jsp DOİ: https://doi.org/10.26900/jsp.3.046 Research Article PUNISHMENT AND VIOLENCE IN EDUCATION DURING THE LAST CENTURY OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AND THE EARLY YEARS OF THE REPUBLIC Rezzan AKÇATEPE * * Lect. Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Department of Ataturk's Principles and History of Turkish Revolution, TURKEY, e-mail: [email protected] ORCİD ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2285-8449 Received: 05 November 2019; Accepted: 21 November 2019 ABSTRACT The aim of this study is to examine the punishment and violence-based practices applied to the students in the last century of the Ottoman Empire and in the early years of the Republic and to present the information on the subject based on the sources. It is insufficient to understand the discipline and practices of Ottoman educational institutions only with regulations and instructions. Therefore, we have benefited from memories, school memories and autobiographies which are important in educational history studies. In addition to these, we frequently included the publications of our researchers historians who studied the last century of the Ottoman Empire, and in light of these, we tried to analyze the case of punishment and violence in education in the last century of the Ottoman Empire and in the early years of the Republic. Keywords: Ottoman Empire, education, modernization, punishment, violence 1. INTRODUCTION During the Classical Period of the Ottoman Empire, education was carried out by the madrasa and Enderun (a special school in the Ottoman palace).
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Sınıf İngilizce
    8. Sınıf İngilizce 7. Ünite: Tourism Answer the question according to the brochure below. • Are you interested in nature? • Would you like to take a balloon tour? • What about trying horse riding or paraglading? Then, take a trip to Göreme between August 28-30. Enjoy a two-night stay at a five-star hotel. For more information call: 0 500 123 45 67 1. Which question is NOT answered in the text? A) What do we eat? B) How long is the trip? C) What activities do you offer? D) Where do we stay during the trip? MEB 2019 - 2020 ● Ölçme, Değerlendirme ve Sınav Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü 7. Ünite: Tourism Answer the question according to Fiona’s talk. I work in a big city so holidays are important for me. I prefer summer holidays. I love the sea and the beach but historic places attract me most. I have exciting plans for next summer. First, I am going to visit an ancient city because I like walking through old cities and learning about different cultures. Then, I will go to a beautiful hotel by the beach and swim every day. Fiona 2. Where is she going to start her holiday? A) B) C) D) MEB 2019 - 2020 ● Ölçme, Değerlendirme ve Sınav Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü 7. Ünite: Tourism Answer the questions 3 and 4 according to the brochure. TRAVEL TO TURKEY BALIKESİR RİZE It’s famous for Mount Ida (Kazdağı), special desserts, Rize is famous for its natural beauties. seafood and local bazaars. You can enjoy swimming Its most important features are: tea gardens, and the beautiful beaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottoman Empire & European Theatre VIII
    Ottoman Empire & European Theatre VIII ______________ 28 – 29 M a y 2 0 1 5 International Symposium I s t a n b u l – Pera Museum Culture, Diplomacy and Peacemaking: Ottoman-European Relations in the Wake of the Treaty of Belgrade (1739) and the Era of Maria Theresia (r.1740–1780) Under the patronage of Exc. Hasan Göğüş Exc. Dr. Klaus Wölfer Ambassador of & Ambassador of the Republic of Turkey in Vienna the Republic of Austria in Ankara In cooperation with International Symposium Istanbul 2015 by Don Juan Archiv Wien OTTOMAN EMPIRE & EUROPEAN THEATRE VIII Culture, Diplomacy and Peacemaking: Ottoman-European Relations in the Wake of the Treaty of Belgrade (1739) and the Era of Maria Theresia (r.1740–1780) 28 – 29 May 2015 Istanbul, Pera Museum Organized by Don Juan Archiv Wien In cooperation with Pera Museum Istanbul, The UNESCO International Theatre Institute in Vienna (ITI) and The Austrian Cultural Forum in Istanbul PROGRAMME OVERVIEW Thursday, May 28th 2015 10:00–11:00 Opening Ceremony 11:00–11:30 Coffee Break 11:30–12:45 Session I “Of Ottoman Diplomacy” Seyfi Kenan The Education of an Ottoman Envoy during the Early Modern Period (Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries) John Whitehead The Embassy of Yirmisekizzade Said Mehmed Pasha to Paris (1742) 12:45–14:00 Lunch Break 14:00–15:15 Session II “The Siege of Belgrade (1789) and the Legend of a Field Marshal” Tatjana Marković Celebrating Field Marshal Gideon Ernest von Laudon (1717–1790) in European Literature and Music Michael Hüttler Celebrating Field Marshal Gideon Ernest von Laudon (1717–1790) in Theatre: The Siege of Belgrade on Stage 15:15–15:30 Coffee Break 15:30–16:45 Session III “Theatrical Aspects: Venice, Paris” Maria Alberti L’impresario delle Smirne (‘The Impresario from Smyrna’, 1759) by Carlo Goldoni (1707–1793), Namely the Naive Turk Aliye F.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottoman Women in Public Urban Spaces
    Ottoman Women in Public Urban Spaces Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Department of Near Eastern and Judaic Studies, and Women and Gender Studies Kanan Makiya, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Master’s Degree by Emily Baum August 2012 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I offer my sincerest gratitude to my advisor, Professor Kanan Makiya, who has supported me throughout my thesis with his patience and knowledge while still allowing me the room to work in my own way. His encouragement and effort was vital to the survival of this project and without him, this thesis would not have been completed or written. As well, Professors Sarah Lamb, ChaeRan Freeze, and Bernadette Brooten have offered much advice and insight throughout my work. I would also like to thank Shannon Hunt for dealing with my many moments of panic about this project and her ever-present support over the past year. As well, I would like to thank the departments of Near Eastern and Judaic Studies and Women and Gender Studies for providing the support and resources I have needed to produce and complete my thesis. Finally, I would like to thank my family and friends for supporting me throughout all my studies. This would have been impossible without their support and love. Emily Baum ii Abstract Ottoman Women in Public Urban Spaces A thesis presented to the Near Eastern and Judaic Studies, and Women and Gender Studies Departments Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By Emily Baum This paper seeks to examine women’s interactions with urban spaces in the Ottoman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 7 Practice Exam 1 1
    Unit 7 Practice Exam 1 1. Read the postcard below. Which one is FALSE? 3. Find the statement in the dialogue that shows John makes a comparison. Dear Linda, Bob : Do you have any plans for your next trip? Greetings from İzmir! This is my third John : No, not really. day in İzmir. I’m having a great time Bob : Why don’t we go to Patara Beach? It’s one here! I’m staying in a big hotel in the of the most beautiful sandy beaches in the city centre. The weather is great. I’m Mediterranean. enjoying the sunny weather. Yesterday I went on a tour of the city, and today I John : That sounds great! But I don’t enjoy spending have gone shopping and bought some time at the seaside. I would rather see historical nice souvenirs. Tomorrow, I’m going to sites. Visiting ancient ruins is more interesting. visit the ancient ruins of the fantastic city Last year, I was in Egypt and I took a hot air of Ephesus and see the house of Virgin balloon ride over the temples. It was the most Mary. amazing experience of my life. I’ll never forget it. Bye for now. A) I would rather see historical sites. B) Visiting ancient ruins is more interesting. C) I took a hot air balloon ride over the temples. A) William has already visited the historic sites. D) It was the most amazing experience of my life. B) William has been in İzmir for three days. C) William has done some shopping.
    [Show full text]
  • Sublime Porte: Art and Contemporary Turkey
    2 MARCH 14 – MAY 2, 2013 Curated by Parvez Mohsin and Yulia Tikhonova LOCATION GALLERY HOURS Dr. M.T. Geoffrey Yeh Art Gallery Tuesday–Friday, 10 a.m. - 5 p.m. Sun Yat Sen Hall Saturday, 12 - 5 p.m. St. John’s University Sunday–Monday, Closed 8000 Utopia Parkway www.stjohns.edu/yehgallery Queens, NY 11439 Exhibition Prints: Kenneth Pizzo Photo Editing: Deanna Rizzi Graphic Design: Dana Jefferson This exhibition is made possible by the generous support of: CONTENTS 01 Director’s Note Parvez Mohsin 02 “Sublime Porte: Art and Contemporary Turkey” Yulia Tikhonova 04 “A Gathering of Memory and Light” Paul Fabozzi 08 Artists Osman Akan Michael Marfione Burak Arikan Alex Morel Kezban Batibeki Arzu Ozkal Nezaket Ekici Gulay Semercioglu Paul Fabozzi Orkan Telhan Murat Germen Elif Uras Peter Hristoff Halil Vurucuoglu Gözde Ilkin DIRECTOR’S NOTE I experienced Turkey through Istanbul’s vibrant cosmopolis and its layering of civilizations. Never before had I seen a city so rooted in its glorious past, while balanced against the modern- izing forces that are shaping its future. In Istanbul, I witnessed the country’s recent economic expansion and the assertion of its political and economic scope of influence on world affairs. Istanbul’s history, cultural diversity and Ottoman architecture allowed me to situate myself in a unique place in the world – the crossroads of Eastern and Western cultures. I related to the city collectively and individually. Its overpowering presence offers a window into contemporary human relationships. Istanbul’s historical narrative is poignantly conveyed through its monu- ments specifically, Hagia Sophia’s aesthetic dualism and the symbolism of the Sublime Porte.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christian Remains of the Seven Churches of the Apocalypse
    1974, 3) THE BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGIST 69 The Christian Remains of the Seven Churches of the Apocalypse OTTO F. A. MEINARDU S Athens, Greece Some months ago, I revisited the island of Patmos and the sites of the seven churches to which letters are addressed in the second and third chap- ters of the book of Revelation. What follows is a report on such Christian remains as have survived and an indication of the various traditions which have grown up at the eight locations, where, as at so many other places in the Orthodox and Latin world, piety has sought tangible localization. I set out from Piraeus and sailed to the island of Patmos, off the Turkish coast, which had gained its significance because of the enforced exile of God's servant John (Rev. 1:1, 9) and from the acceptance of the Revelation in the NT canon. From the tiny port of Skala, financial and tourist center of Patmos, the road ascends to the 11th century Greek Orthodox monastery of St. John the Theologian. Half way to this mighty fortress monastery, I stopped at the Monastery of the Apocalypse, which enshrines the "Grotto of the Revelation." Throughout the centuries pilgrims have come to this site to receive blessings. When Pitton de Tournefort visited Patmos in 1702, the grotto was a poor hermitage administered by the bishop of Samos. The abbot presented de Tournefort with pieces of rock from the grotto, assuring him that they could expel evil spirits and cure diseases. Nowadays, hundreds of western tourists visit the grotto daily, especially during the summer, and are shown those traditional features which are related in one way or another with the vision of John.
    [Show full text]
  • Manuscrit Acceptat
    MANUSCRIT ACCEPTAT The South-eastern Aegean Mercourios Georgiadis Lemos, I.; Kotsonas, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Archaeology of Early Llibre Greece and the Mediterranean. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2020 ISBN 978-1-118-77019-1 Disponible Data de publicació 2020 en línia Per citar aquest document: Mercourios Georgiadis, "The Southeastern Aegean" a Lemos, I.; Kotsonas, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Archaeology of Early Greece and the Mediterranean, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, p. 985-1006. Aquest arxiu PDF conté el manuscrit acceptat per a la seva publicació. The South-eastern Aegean Keywords: South-eastern Aegean, Rhodes, Kos, burials, graves, pottery, sanctuary, cremation, inhumation, past Introduction The area of the South-eastern Aegean is defined here as the region known today as the Dodecanese and parts of Anatolia on the opposite coast, like the Halicarnassos peninsula. This area of the Aegean had been under the Minoan cultural influence from as early as the Middle Bronze Age in terms of its material culture and architecture (Georgiadis 2003). The South-eastern Aegean has yielded many remains of the LH III and the EIA, whilst it possesses a strategic position in the Aegean Sea in relation to its contacts and interactions with the Eastern Mediterranean. The traditional forms of explanation for culturalACCEPTAT development and change in this region have focused on migration and the presence of newcomers. In fact, this has been a common denominator in the understanding of the Southern-eastern Aegean equally for the Late Helladic III period and the Early Iron Age. The thorough and up-to-date presentation of the different cultural aspects and periods from this area will demonstrate the regional character and the idiosyncrasies that are visible already from the LH III phase.
    [Show full text]
  • QUES in ARCH HIST I Jump to Today Questions in Architectural History 1
    [email protected] - QUES IN ARCH HIST I Jump to Today Questions in Architectural History 1 Faculty: Zeynep Çelik Alexander, Reinhold Martin, Mabel O. Wilson Teaching Fellows: Oskar Arnorsson, Benedict Clouette, Eva Schreiner Thurs 11am-1pm Fall 2016 This two-semester introductory course is organized around selected questions and problems that have, over the course of the past two centuries, helped to define architecture’s modernity. The course treats the history of architectural modernity as a contested, geographically and culturally uncertain category, for which periodization is both necessary and contingent. The fall semester begins with the apotheosis of the European Enlightenment and the early phases of the industrial revolution in the late eighteenth century. From there, it proceeds in a rough chronology through the “long” nineteenth century. Developments in Europe and North America are situated in relation to worldwide processes including trade, imperialism, nationalism, and industrialization. Sequentially, the course considers specific questions and problems that form around differences that are also connections, antitheses that are also interdependencies, and conflicts that are also alliances. The resulting tensions animated architectural discourse and practice throughout the period, and continue to shape our present. Each week, objects, ideas, and events will move in and out of the European and North American frame, with a strong emphasis on relational thinking and contextualization. This includes a historical, relational understanding of architecture itself. Although the Western tradition had recognized diverse building practices as “architecture” for some time, an understanding of architecture as an academic discipline and as a profession, which still prevails today, was only institutionalized in the European nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]