DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legislative Report LEGISLATIVE REPORT A compilation of 2010 Statutes Legislative Briefings November 16, Sacramento November 16, Webinar November 17, Orange League of California Cities 2010 Legislative Report Additional copies of the Legislative Report may be purchased for: City Officials $10.00 SKU#: 1184 Non-City Officials $20.00 SKU#: 1131 Price includes sales tax and shipping Ten percent discount on orders of five or more copies Please mail payment to: League of California Cities Publications Department 1400 K Street, Ste. 400 Sacramento, CA 95814 Publications: Phone: (916) 658-8247 Fax: (916) 658-8240 www.cacities.org This document will be available on the League’s website in December 2010: http://www.cacities.org/legresources About the League Established in 1898, the League of California Cities is a member organization that represents California’s incorporated cities. The League strives to protect the local authority and autonomy of city government and help California’s cities effectively serve their residents. In addition to advocating on cities’ behalf at the state capitol, the League provides its members with professional development programs and information resources, conducts educational conferences and research, and publishes Western City magazine. Legislative Report 2010 Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This publication is the work product of the League of California Cities and is being provided to city officials in its member cities in electronic form to assist their efforts to track legislation. If information is taken from this document and is used by city officials in member cities for informational and other purposes, the League requests that the information be attributed to the League of California Cities. This publication, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form by any person not employed by a member city without the express permission of the League of California Cities. Table of Contents i Table of Contents Table of Contents........................................................................................................... i I. 2010: A Year of Significant League Accomplishments........................................... 1 II. Administrative Services............................................................................................ 7 A. Political Reform Act of 1974............................................................................. 7 B. Public Records ................................................................................................. 7 C. Elections........................................................................................................... 7 D. Other Administrative Services Related Issues ................................................. 8 III. Community Services.............................................................................................. 11 IV. Employee Relations............................................................................................... 13 A. California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) ........................ 13 B. Workers’ Compensation................................................................................. 15 C. Labor Relations.............................................................................................. 15 D. Personnel....................................................................................................... 15 E. Health Care.................................................................................................... 17 F. Unemployment Insurance............................................................................... 18 V. Environmental Quality............................................................................................ 20 A. Air Quality....................................................................................................... 20 B. Coastal........................................................................................................... 20 C. Climate Change ............................................................................................. 21 D. Energy ........................................................................................................... 21 E. Hazardous Waste........................................................................................... 23 F. Solid Waste .................................................................................................... 23 G. Water ............................................................................................................. 24 H. Water Quality ................................................................................................. 26 VI. Housing, Community and Economic Development ............................................ 27 A. Common Interest Developments.................................................................... 27 B. Land Use and Zoning..................................................................................... 27 C. Housing and Residential Facilities ................................................................. 31 D. Environment, CEQA and Natural Resource Legislation................................. 34 E. Mobilehome Parks ......................................................................................... 36 F. Redevelopment/Local Government Organization........................................... 36 G. Mortgage Legislation ..................................................................................... 37 H. Economic & Community Development........................................................... 38 VII. Public Safety ......................................................................................................... 40 A. Controlled Substances ................................................................................... 40 B. Corrections & Parole ...................................................................................... 41 C. Crimes/Sentencing......................................................................................... 43 D. Fire Service/Emergency & Disaster Response .............................................. 45 E. Gaming/Gambling .......................................................................................... 46 F. Gangs/Youth Violence.................................................................................... 47 G. Identification Protection/Confidentiality .......................................................... 47 H. Law Enforcement Personnel.......................................................................... 48 I. Minors/Youth.................................................................................................. 49 J. Public Safety & Technology........................................................................... 50 League of California Cities 2010 Legislative Report ii Table of Contents K. Sexual Offender Management ....................................................................... 52 L. Other Public Safety Items............................................................................... 53 VIII. Revenue and Taxation......................................................................................... 54 A. Bonds, Debts and Investments ...................................................................... 54 B. Property Tax/Property-Related Measures...................................................... 54 C. Sales and Use Tax and Other Revenues....................................................... 56 D. State Budget .................................................................................................. 57 Mid-Year 2009-10 Budget Changes .......................................................... 57 2010-11 March Budget Deal...................................................................... 57 2010-11 October Budget Deal ................................................................... 60 IX. Transportation, Communications and Public Works.......................................... 68 A. Bonds............................................................................................................. 68 B. Contracting..................................................................................................... 68 C. Local Authority ............................................................................................... 69 D. Vehicles ......................................................................................................... 71 E. Public Works .................................................................................................. 71 F. Communications ............................................................................................ 72 G. Other Transportation Items............................................................................ 73 Appendix A - Additional Resources A. Potential Effects of Prop. 26: Initial Considerations........................................ 77 B. A Look at the 2011-12 Legislature ................................................................. 79 Appendix B - League Resources A. League Legislative Staff................................................................................. 83 B. Regional Public Affairs Managers .................................................................. 85 C. 10 Tips for Cities Lobbying the California Legislature .................................... 86 D. Effective Letter Writing Techniques ..............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LACCRC Ex Parte Communications Log V07 8.2.21.Xlsx
    LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL REDISTRICTING COMMISSION 2021 - Ex Parte Communications Log - Date Time Commissioner(s) Contacts Involved Summary of Content Solomon Rivera, Staff of CM 1/21/2021 7:00 PM Michele Siqueiros Marqueece Harris-Dawson Timing of the delivery of Census information (CD8) CM Marqueece Harris- 1/29/2021 11:00 AM Fred Ali Timing of the delivery of Census information Dawson (CD8) Council President Nury 2/1/2021 6:00 PM Fred Ali, Michele Siqueiros Timing of the delivery of Census information Martinez (CD6) 2/5/2021 11:30 AM Richard Katz CM Bob Blumenfield (CD3) Timing of the delivery of Census information 2/5/2021 8:00 AM Sonja Diaz CM Kevin De Leon (CD14) News article sent to CM regarding Census Update on progress of the Commission and the timing of 2/19/2021 9:00 AM Richard Katz CM Bob Blumenfield (CD3) the delivery of Census information Curtis Earnest, Staff of CM Update on progress of the Commission and the timing of 2/19/2021 11:30 AM Paloma Perez-McEvoy Curren Price (CD9) the delivery of Census information 2/26/21 9:30 AM Cecilia Cabello John Popoch (CD3) Redistricting process and data delays 3/1/21 11:16 AM Cecilia Cabello Jeff Millman (Mayor's Office) Redistricting process Ana Guerrero (Mayor's Update on work of Commission, including delayed 3/7/21 10:00 AM Fred Ali Office) release of information 3/16/21 5:30 PM Paloma Perez-McEvoy Curtis Earnest (CD9) Delayed data delivery and schedule impacts 4/6/21 5:03 PM Valerie Lynne-Shaw Solomon Rivera (CD8) Discussion of outreach options CM Marqueece Harris- 3/19/21 1:30 PM
    [Show full text]
  • March 16, 2020 Councilmember David Ryu Councilmember
    March 16, 2020 Councilmember David Ryu Councilmember Marqueece Harris-Dawson Councilmember Curren Price Councilmember Herb Wesson Los Angeles City Hall 200 N. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Re: Request for Motion and Unanimous Passage for Neighborhood Council Funding Rollover to Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Dear Councilmembers Ryu, Harris-Dawson, Price and Wesson, We truly are witnessing one of the most sweeping crisis of our time. I am asking for your assistance on an immediate basis with a neighborhood council matter. Many neighborhood councils, including the one I preside over, have cancelled meetings and events in co-operation with our City’s COVID-19 containment strategies. I am deeply concerned over how this change in the rules of engagement will impact funding initiatives in the respective communities and the ability to return to business as usual seamlessly. What can be done to ensure that this interruption isn’t disruptive to future neighborhood council endeavors? One answer is to allow NC’s to rollover all of the fiscal year 2019- 2020 funding to the following fiscal year. This will afford us the opportunity to continue to produce meaningful community events and award neighborhood purpose grants that may not come to fruition. Because we cannot conduct business as usual so close to the end of our fiscal year, my request is simply that one, or all of you, file a motion that orders the City Clerk to allow all 99 neighborhood councils to roll over all unspent 2019-2020 fiscal year funds into fiscal year 2020-2021. Second, I am requesting that City Council pass this motion unanimously and immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Krekorian 2013
    LOS ANGELES CITY ETHICS COMMISSION Date Received COVER PAGE Please type or print in ink. RECEIVED NAME OF RLER (I.AST) (FIRST) (MIDDLE) Krekorian Paul Martin 1. Office, Agency, or Court Agency Name (Do not use acronyms) City of Los Angeles - Council Distdct 2 Division, Board, Department, District, if applicable Your Position Councilmember ¯ If filing for multiple positions, list below or on an attachment. (Do not use acronyms) Agency:. Position: Jurisdiction of Office (Check at least one box) = [] State [] Judge or Court Commissioner (Statewide Jurisdictiq~ [] Multi-county [] County of ~ . [] City of Los Angeles [] Other e Type of Statement (Check at least one box) [] Annual: The Period covered is January 1, 2013, through [] Leaving Office: Date Left ~L__J. December 31, 2013. (Check one) -Or- The period covered is ! / ¯ through O The period covered is January 1, 2013, through the date of December 31, 2013, leaving office. [] Assuming Office: Date assumed ! / O The period covered is ! ! . through the date of leaving office. [] Candidate: Election year and office sought, if different than Part 1: Schedule Summary = 5 Check applicable schedules or ~’None." ¯ Total number of pages including this cover page: [] Schedule A-1 -/nvestments - schedule attached [] Schedule C - Income, Loans, & Business Positions - schedule attached [] Schedule A-2 -/nvestments - schedule attached [] Schedule D - Income - Gifts - schedule attached [] Schedule B - Real Property - schedule attached [] Schedule E - Income - Gifts - Travel Payments - schedule attached
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MOTION Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, grocery workers in the City of Los Angeles have continued to report to work and serve their communities, despite the ongoing hazards and danger of being exposed to the novel coronavirus. Because of the work of these essential grocery workers, families throughout the City have had access to the food they need during this pandemic. However, the pandemic is far from over and with increased case rates, the health threats that grocery workers face are even greater now than when this crisis began. These essential grocery workers cannot choose to work from home - they must come in to work to do their jobs, which involves substantial interaction with customers. Workers are wearing masks, social distancing, and constantly wiping down cash registers, food conveyor belts and shopping carts in order to protect the public health. Additionally, these workers are continuously working to restock items that households desperately need like toilet paper, cleaning supplies and other essentials. These workers are staying inside with large crowds every day under ventilation systems that could be spreading the novel coronavirus. This puts these essential grocery workers in a position where they must live with the daily fear of not only contracting the virus but also bringing it home to their families. The number of COVID-19 clusters within the grocery industry in the City of Los Angeles continues to rise significantly. The health threat that these grocery workers face cannot be overstated - recent studies before the current surge report grocery workers to be 5 times more likely to test positive.
    [Show full text]
  • Alex Villanueva, Sheriff a National Disgrace… a Local Tragedy
    Alex Villanueva, Sheriff A National Disgrace… A Local Tragedy. _________________________________________________ Photo by Brittany Murray, Press-Telegram/SCNG SHERIFF VILLANUEVA AND HOST TEAM VISIT VENICE BEACH BOARDWALK The Architects: _________________________________________________ District 1 Gil Cedillo District 2 Paul Krekorian Mayor Eric Garcetti (Public Office since 2001) District 3 Bob Blumenfield District 4 Nithya Raman LA Board of Supervisors District 5 Paul Koretz District 6 Nury Martinez LA City Council District 7 Monica Rodriguez MTA District 8 Marqueece Harris-Dawson District 9 Curren Price LAHSA District 10 Mark Ridley-Thomas District 11 Mike Bonin District 12 John Lee District 13 Mitch O'Farrell District 14 Kevin de León District 15 Joe Buscaino HONORABLE MENTION: The numerous political activist 501(c) organizations who receive over 1 BILLION dollars per year, while the problem continues to grow at an exponential rate. LOS ANGELES COUNTY LOS ANGELES COUNTY LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT 11 AUTHORITY CA GOVERNMENT CODE 26600. The sheriff shall preserve peace, and to accomplish this object may sponsor, supervise, or participate in any project of crime prevention, rehabilitation of persons previously convicted of crime, or the suppression of delinquency. AUTHORITY CA GOVERNMENT CODE 26601. The sheriff shall arrest and take before the nearest magistrate for examination all persons who attempt to commit or who have committed a public offense. AUTHORITY CA GOVERNMENT CODE 26602. The sheriff shall prevent and suppress any affrays, breaches of the peace, riots, and insurrections that come to his or her knowledge, and investigate public offenses which have been committed.
    [Show full text]
  • Item 8 Information
    Item 8 Information Quarterly Lobbying Summary Executive Summary: This item presents a summary of activities reported to the Ethics Commission by lobbying entities for the fourth quarter of 2019. Recommended Action: This item is for informational purposes only. Authors: Heather Holt, Executive Director Mark Low, Lobbying Program Manager Presenter: Tyler Joseph, Director of Policy Ethics Commission February 18, 2020 Lobbying Summary: 4th Quarter 2019 A. Introduction The Municipal Lobbying Ordinance (MLO) regulates persons who receive compensation to lobby City officials. Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) §§ 48.01, et seq. In LAMC § 48.01(B), the MLO makes several findings regarding lobbying activity, including the following: 1. Citizens have a right to know the identities of those who attempt to influence City decisions; 2. Public disclosure by lobbyists and their clients regarding their lobbying activities is essential to citizen confidence in the integrity of local government; 3. It is in the public interest to ensure that lobbyists do not misrepresent facts or their positions; 4. It is in the public interest to ensure that lobbyists do not place City officials under personal obligation to themselves or their clients. To help ensure adequate and effective disclosure regarding efforts to lobby City government, lobbying entities are required to file quarterly disclosure reports. See LAMC §§ 48.01(B)(6), 48.08. This item summarizes information disclosed on the lobbying reports filed for the fourth quarter of 2019. B. Legal Background 1. Definitions The MLO defines lobbying activity generally as compensated conduct related to communications with City officials that are designed to influence municipal matters.
    [Show full text]
  • CFA HEADLINES November 2, 2006 - SPECIAL EDITION from CFA
    FROM: THE CALIFORNIA FACULTY ASSOCIATION [email protected] - http://www.calfac.org CFA HEADLINES November 2, 2006 - SPECIAL EDITION FROM CFA ELECTION • The election is almost here, get involved now! • List of CFA endorsed candidates and initiatives * * * • THE ELECTION IS ALMOST HERE, HELP GET OUT THE VOTE! With the November 7 midterm election now only days away, CFA urges members not only to vote but also to get involved in promoting voter turnout. Many of the races for statewide office are down to the wire, with dozens more legislative seats teetering within a few points' difference. Your involvement is more important than ever. With the races so close it all comes down to turnout. By doing as little as putting in a few hours this weekend to participate in phone banking or precinct walking, you can help CFA remind voters to go to the polls come Tuesday. One of the easiest ways to help get out the vote is to contact your local Central Labor Council. To find the Central Labor Council in your area, visit http://www.calaborfed.org/about/clc.html For CFA members in the Los Angeles area, there is also a major phone banking and precinct walking effort being put on by the LA County Federation of Labor. To see the full schedule and locations, go to http://www.launionaflcio.org/news/06-09-19_schedule06.html • CFA’s LIST OF ENDORSEMENTS State Offices Governor: Phil Angelides Lt Governor: John Garamendi Secretary of State: Debra Bowen Attorney General: Jerry Brown Treasurer: Bill Lockyer Controller: John Chiang State Senate SD 02 Humboldt - Pat Wiggins
    [Show full text]
  • Cg /I' ERIC GARCETTI Mayor
    ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR February 27, 2014 Honorable Members of the City Council clo City Clerk City Hall, Room 395 Honorable Members: Subject to your confirmation, I have appointed the Honorable Curren Price to the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission. This appointment is pursuant to the Coliseum's Amended and Restated Management Agreement of 2013. I certify that in my opinion Mr. Price is qualified for the work that will devolve upon him, and that I make the appointment solely in the interest of the City. Sincerely, cG /I' ERIC GARCETTI Mayor EG:dlg Attachment 200 N. SPRING STREET, ROOM 303 LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 (213) 978-0600 MAYOR.LAC1TY.ORG COMMISSION APPOINTMENT FORM Name: Curren Price Commission: Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission Appointee Information 1. Race/ethnicity: African American 2. Gender: Male .3. Council district and neighborhood of residence: 9 - South Los Angeles 4. Are you a registered voter? Yes 5. Prior commission experience: 6. Highest level of education completed: J.D., University of Santa Clara 7. Occupation/profession: Council member, Council District 9 8. Experience(s) that qualifies person for appointment: See attached resume 9. Purpose of this appointment: 10. Current composition of the commission (excluding appointee): .- ,~. .. -- _.. I _ _ . CD - '.- Price, Curren GarceUi South LA- g African American M 26-Feb-14 (alternate) Cel Pres Ridley Thomas, Mark County African American M Knabe, Don (alternate) County Caucasian M State (alternate) State Curren Price On July 1, 2013 Councilman Curren D, Price Jr. became the 17th person elected to the Los Angeles City Council representing the 9th Council District.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Primaries and Top Two Elections: Proposition 14 on California’S June 2010 Ballot
    Open Primaries and Top Two Elections: Proposition 14 on California’s June 2010 Ballot by Molly Milligan OPEN PRIMARIES AND TOP TWO ELECTIONS: PROPOSITION 14 ON CALIFORNIA’S JUNE 2010 BALLOT By Molly Milligan Center for Governmental Studies ForewordForewordForeword The Center for Governmental Studies (CGS) has studied California governance issues for more than 25 years. This study, “Open Primaries and Top Two Elections: Proposition 14 on California’s June 2010 Ballot,” began shortly after its provisions were passed by the Legislature as part of the budget deal on February 20, 2009. In a compromise that broke a stalemate that had persisted for six months, the Legislature gained the vote of Republican Senator Abel Maldonado to pass the budget (needed to achieve a two-thirds majority) in exchange for placing his proposal to change the election system in California on the June 2010 ballot. Maldonado’s proposal is now known as Proposition 14. It would require the use of open primaries in elections for state and most federal officials. Under such a system, a voter can vote for any candidate running for a particular office regardless of his or her party affiliation or that of the candidates; the top two vote getters in the primary, and no other candidates, contest a general election run off to determine the winner of each seat. CGS examined the possible electoral outcomes under such a system, using voter registration and participation data, and campaign finance information. We believe our study provides a fascinating snapshot of California voters in 2010 and presents valuable information to help voters determine how to vote on this important issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Item 6 Action
    Item 6 Action Campaign Contributions and Behested Payments Executive Summary: This item recommends options for regulating campaign contributions and fundraising by non- individuals and developers, as well as behested payments. Recommended Action: Determine whether to approve options for regulating campaign contributions, fundraising, and behested payments. Authors: Heather Holt, Executive Director David Tristan, Deputy Executive Director Presenters: Tyler Joseph, Director of Policy David Tristan, Deputy Executive Director Ethics Commission February 19, 2019 Campaign Contributions and Behested Payments A. Introduction City law limits the amount of money that a single person may give to a single candidate for elected City office. Currently, a campaign contribution may not exceed $800 per person per election for City Council candidates or $1,500 per person per election for Citywide candidates. In April 2018, the Ethics Commission began an analysis of whether campaign contributions from developers should be banned. This report continues that discussion and identifies options on pages 4 and 7. This report also revisits a previous discussion regarding behested payments and identifies options on pages 10 and 11. B. Process This review represents many hours of discussion across several disciplines within the agency. Over the past ten months, the staff has analyzed data, assessed public input, and examined laws in other jurisdictions. An Ethics Commission subcommittee was formed to look at the issue, and several meetings with subcommittee members and high-level staff in the Department of City Planning (the Planning Department) have been held. Public input has been solicited throughout this review. Most recently, it was solicited through website postings and an email solicitation sent on January 18, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Young Angelenos, a Small Group of Volunteer Citizen Activists
    Remember, what happens in our backyard matters, and Young Angelenos, a small group this election has some high stakes, so please email your of volunteer citizen activists, people and pass this guide along. We hope you find it envision our city and the greater Los Angeles region as a informative and helpful and that it will occasionally productive, prosperous community with engaged citizens make you chuckle. who advocate for progressive public policy. Happy voting. With that in mind, Young Angelenos have compiled a progressives’ voter guide in partnership with GOOD Your volunteers, Magazine for the Los Angeles primary election on YoungAngelenos.com March 5th, which includes a mayoral campaign that will dictate the future of Los Angeles. Kabira Stokes, Bich Ngoc Cao, Jason McCabe, Alex Richmond, Alexandra Hepp, Alice Gualpa, Beth Karlin, We’ve tried to provide as much info as we could about Brad Petering, Brendan Piper, Christine Guardia, Crystal how these folks stand on issues like jobs, the Murphy, Erika Backberg, Gwenaelle Gobe, Harley Cross, environment, education, healthcare, civil rights—the Marguerite Moreau, Michele Elmer, Nicholas Stankevich, stuff you care about. We trust you to make the decision Robin Petering, Stephen Blaim, Taylor Miller, Tim Golden from there. Some disclaimers: This guide is a volunteer operation, CONTENTS not produced by GOOD. Due to research fatigue, lame candidate websites and Murphy’s Law, you may spot a 1. Mayor - sexy race 2 mistake or two. Some candidates simply don’t provide a 2. City Attorney 14 lot of info, and our researcher styles varied, so some 3. City Controller 19 profiles may differ or seem a bit incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • Crenshaw Transit Corridor Project -Community Outreach Section
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environment Impact Report 6.0 – Community Participation 6.0 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 6.1 Introduction This chapter documents the Crenshaw Transit Corridor Project Public Involvement Program for the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Alternatives Analysis (AA)/Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR), in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This chapter documents the public participation process and activities from the scoping period (September – November 2007) to the submission of the Administrative Draft EIS/EIR (April 2009). The goals of the public involvement program are to: Encourage and educate a broad and diverse base of stakeholders, particularly underrepresented minority communities, regarding the on-going status of the project. Ensure that the process created for public input facilitates meaningful participation in the project planning/development process, especially for potentially impacted members of the community. Document, log, and respond to the public’s concerns regarding the project. Provide the technical team with information needed to develop mitigation measures and to ensure that the public’s comments and issues are included in the environmental document. Maximize public participation by providing multiple opportunities to meet and engage the public. Provide multi-lingual communications, as necessary. Collateral materials are always produced in both English and Spanish and are provided in other languages as needed. 6.1.1 Outreach During Environmental Scoping Process 6.1.1.1 Notice of Intent/Notice of Preparation (NOI/NOP) The scoping period for the Crenshaw Transit Corridor Project was initiated on September 27, 2007 when the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) approved the Notice of Intent/Notice of Preparation (NOI/NOP) for the project EIS/EIR.
    [Show full text]