WORLD SURGERY Burn Wound Infections: Current Status
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
World J. Surg. 22, 135–145, 1998 WOR L D Journal of SURGERY © 1998 by the Socie´te´ Internationale de Chirurgie Burn Wound Infections: Current Status Basil A. Pruitt, Jr., M.D.,1 Albert T. McManus, Ph.D.,2 Seung H. Kim, M.D.,2 Cleon W. Goodwin, M.D.2 1Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78229, USA 2U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3400 Rawley E. Chambers Avenue, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234-6315, USA Abstract. The burn wound represents a susceptible site for opportunistic incidence of infection in burn patients, and increased burn patient colonization by organisms of endogenous and exogenous origin. Patient survival. factors such as age, extent of injury, and depth of burn in combination with microbial factors such as type and number of organisms, enzyme and toxin production, and motility determine the likelihood of invasive burn wound infection. Burn wound infections can be classified on the basis of the causative organism, the depth of invasion, and the tissue response. The wound caused by thermal energy represents a locus minoris Diagnostic procedures and therapy must be based on an understanding of resistentiae, which until the development of effective topical the pathophysiology of the burn wound and the pathogenesis of the antimicrobial chemotherapeutic agents in the mid-1960s was various forms of burn wound infection. The time-related changes in the the most common site of infection which caused devastating predominant flora of the burn wound from gram-positive to gram- negative recapitulate the history of burn wound infection. Proper clinical morbidity and, when invasive, virtually universal mortality in burn and culture surveillance of the burn wound permits early diagnosis of patients [1]. The incidence of invasive burn wound sepsis is gram-positive cellulitis, and the stable susceptibility of b-hemolytic proportional to the extent of the burn and is influenced by both streptococci to penicillin has eliminated the threat of this once common the depth of the burn and the age of the patient. Invasive burn burn wound pathogen. Selection and dissemination of intrinsic and wound infections rarely occur in partial-thickness injuries; they acquired resistance mechanisms increase the probability of burn wound colonization by resistant species such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Even so, occur with greatest frequency in children, with an intermediate effective topical antimicrobial chemotherapy and early burn wound frequency in the elderly, and with lowest frequency in young excision have significantly reduced the overall occurrence of invasive burn adults (15–40 years) [2]. The susceptibility of the burn wound to wound infections. Individual patients, usually those with extensive burns infection results from the combined effect of the presence of in whom wound closure is difficult to achieve, may still develop a variety of bacterial and nonbacterial burn wound infections. Consequently, the coagulated proteins and other microbial nutrients in the wound entirety of the burn wound must be examined on a daily basis by the and the avascularity of the eschar, which prevents delivery of attending surgeon. Any change in wound appearance, with or without immunologically active cells, humoral factors, and even blood- associated clinical changes, should be evaluated by biopsy. Quantitative borne antibiotics to the eschar [3]. cultures of the biopsy sample may identify predominant organisms but The flora of the burn wound also influence the risk of infection are not useful for making the diagnosis of invasive burn wound infection. Histologic examination of the biopsy specimen, which permits staging the and the invasive potential of infections that do occur. The invasive process, is the only reliable means of differentiating wound microbial population of the wound immediately after burning is colonization from invasive infection. Identification of the histologic sparse (bacteria in skin appendages commonly survive the burn) changes characteristic of bacterial, fungal, and viral infections facilitates and predominantly gram-positive. As time passes gram-negative the selection of appropriate therapy. A diagnosis of invasive burn wound infection necessitates change of both local and systemic therapy and, in organisms colonize the eschar, and by the end of the first postburn the case of bacterial and fungal infections, prompt surgical removal of the week they have become the predominant inhabitants of the burn infected tissue. Even after the wounds of extensively burned patients have wound [4]. Prior to the discovery of antibiotics, group A b- healed or been grafted, burn wound impetigo, commonly caused by hemolytic streptococci were the most frequent cause of life- Staphylococcus aureus, may occur in the form of multifocal, small super- threatening burn wound and systemic infections, but penicillin ficial abscesses that require surgical de´bridement. Current techniques of burn wound care have significantly reduced the incidence of invasive burn therapy has essentially eliminated such mortality [5]. The use of wound infection, altered the organisms causing the infections that do penicillin led to the emergence of Staphylococcus aureus as the occur, increased the interval between injury and the onset of infection, most common gram-positive early colonizer of the burn wound reduced the mortality associated with infection, decreased the overall [6]. These organisms may penetrate the eschar and invade the unburned, underlying subcutaneous tissues to form myriad vari- The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the ably sized abscesses. S. aureus seldom traverses fascial planes but authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of promotes formation of thickened abscess walls, which compro- the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense. Correspondence to: Basil A. Pruitt, Jr., Library Branch, U.S. Army mise the effectiveness of host defenses and antibiotic therapy. Institute of Surgical Research, 3400 Rawley E. Chambers Avenue, Fort Because the staphylococci may be seeded into the circulation from Sam Houston, Texas 78234-6315, USA. an undrained abscess, early diagnosis and prompt drainage can 136 World J. Surg. Vol. 22, No. 2, February 1998 Table 1. Classification of burn wound infections. Burn wound cellulitis Localized pain, tenderness, edema, erythema, and heat Involves unburned and undamaged skin at margin of burn or skin graft donor site May be associated with lymphangitis and systemic signs of infection Diagnosis by clinical signs, wound culture, or both Burn wound infections Invasive infections of unexcised eschar Modest to profound changes in appearance of burn wound Diagnosis by histologic examination of viable tissue in wound biopsy Invariably associated with systemic signs of infection Infection of excised burn wound or donor site Formation of neoeschar or focal necrosis on wound surface (or both) Diagnosis by histologic examination of viable tissue in wound biopsy Fig. 1. Organisms causing invasive burn wound infections. Marked Infection of “grafted” wound changes in the epidemiology of invasive burn wound infection have Histologic examination of wound bed biopsy may be required to occurred during two recent successive 7-year periods. The striking reduc- differentiate microbial colonization of nonviable graft from infection of wound bed tion in gram-negative rods as causative agents and the persistence of fungi b have resulted in the latter becoming the predominant causative agents. Culture of graft and wound to identify -hemolytic streptococci GNR: gram-negative rods; GPC: gram-positive cocci; YLO: yeast-like Burn wound impetigo organisms; Fungi: filamentous fungi. Loss of epithelium (initially focal and may become generalized) from a previously grafted or healed burn wound or skin graft donor site May be associated with systemic signs of infection minimize or prevent hematogenous dissemination of staphylococ- Diagnosis by wound culture (most often caused by Staphylococcus) cal infections. The subsequent development and use of broad-spectrum anti- biotics effective against Staphylococcus resulted in the emergence of gram-negative organisms, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa, high risk of invasive infection in such patients necessitates fre- as the predominant organisms causing invasive burn wound quent, scheduled monitoring of their burn wounds to identify infections in burn patients [7]. Gram-negative organisms appear infection in its earliest stages when surgical and pharmacologic to have much greater invasive potential than gram-positive organ- intervention can control the infection and reduce the associated isms. Virulence factors of gram-negative organisms include toxins mortality. The entirety of the burn wound, those areas with intact (both endotoxin and a variety of exotoxins), proteolytic enzymes, eschar and those that have been excised, and even those that have extracellular polysaccharides such as the slime produced by been grafted, must be examined on at least a daily basis. Although certain Pseudomonas organisms, and microbial motility imparted donor site infections are rare, they occur most often in patients by a functioning flagellum [8, 9]. Additionally, antibiotic resis- with massive burns, necessitating that donor sites on such patients tance, both intrinsic and acquired, can influence the course of an be examined each day as well. The wound examination is best infection once established. performed