DOCSLIB.ORG

Richmond General Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Richmond General Plan Volume One of the Richmond General Plan Goals, Policies, Guidelines, Standards, and Implementation Programs Citf yo Richmond Planning August 1994 RICHMOND GENERAL PLAN August 1994 (includes revisions through May 1998; revisedall pages mapsand have date revisionof included) City of Richmond Planning Department 2600 Barrett Avenue Richmond, CA 94804 (510) 620-6706 FAX (510) 620-6858 LO AMENDMENTF GO S AUGUSE TH O T T 1994 ADOPTED RICHMOND GENERAL PLAN l adopteal f o Liste g d lo dGenera e beloth s wi l Plan amendments occurring since th e comprehensive update of the Richmond General Plan was adopted on August 15, 1994 (City Council Resolution #164-94) . The amendments are listed in sequence according to their Planning Dept. file number. Plng. Dept. City Council File No. Resolution #/Date 1995 018.GP 95-2 Resolution #31-95 2/21/95 Description: Mira Vista Schoo , changin4 f o l Site2 revisiop lane p gMa th : d Ma Lan n ne o dUs use designation for the upper portion (area of existing school facilities) of the Mira Vista School site locateMir5 20 a t da Vist a Drive froDensitw mLo y Residentia o Publit l d can Institutional. 018.GP 95-3 Resolution #32-95 2/21/95 Description: Technical Correction Generao st l Plan Volum: e1 (1) Text revision in Land Use Element, adding reference to Point San Pablo. (2) Text revision in Land Use Element, adding guideline referring to Point San Pablo Yacht Harbor. , changin4 f o 4 revisiop (3p gMa ) landesignatio Ma e Lann ne o dus dUs r arenfo a generally Streetd locate3r . S , dd Ohi betweean od Avenue 2n Knoe . nth S xd Freewayan , . , addin4 f o 4 grevisiop lan(4p designatioe Ma ) dMa us e Lann ne o th aren a dUs n a r o nfo southeast corner of the Ford Peninsula. 018.GP 95-4 Resolution #206-95 9/25/95 Description: Pinole Point Properties, 4 acr- f + o e 0 1 revisiop 8 :site p Ma . Ma Lann ne o dUs changin lan designatioe e gth dus aren a ar nlocatefo northerle th t da y corne Atlaf ro s Road dan Giant Highway between the Southern Pacific and AT&SF Railroad rights-of-way from industrial/office fle ligho xt t industry. 1996 018.GP 96-1 Resolution #24-96 2/5/96 Description: El Sobrante Valley and General Policies, Guidelines, and Implementation Programs: (1) Map revision on Map 3 of 4, changing the General Plan land use designation from Very Densitw Lo y Residential (0-5 dwelling units/net acre o Preservation/Resourct ) e Ared aan adding an Agricultural Lands designation to the Open Space and Conservation Map on 263+_ acres of land located in an unincorporated area of Contra Costa County (El Sobrante Valley) southease th n o t sid f Castreo o Ranch RoaCountrysid e wesd th df an o t e subdivision (APNs 432-040-04 and -05). (2) Map revision on Map 3 of 4, changing the General Plan land use designation from Medium Density Residential (9-28 dwelling units/ne Densitw t acreLo o t )y Residential (5-9 dwelling units/net acre) on 36±. acres of land located in an unincorporated area of Contra Costa County (El Sobrante Valley) on the southeast side of Castro Ranch Road across from Amend Road (APNs 433-110-016, 021 024)d an , . (3) Text revisions, amending policies, guidelines, and implementation programs of the Open Spac Conservatiod ean Safetd nan y Element Richmone th f so d General Plan. 018.GP96-2 Resolution #64-96 5/14/96 Description: Technical Corrections to General Plan Volumes I and II: (1) Map revision on Land Use Map 4 of 4, changing land use designation from Medium Density Residential (918; 9 to 28 DU/net acre) to Low Density Residential (917; 5 to 9 DU/net acre) for properties fronting on the north and south sides of Florida Avenue between South 27th Stree Soutd an t h 33rd Street. (2) Map revision on Land Use Map 2 of 4, changing land use designation from Recreation Lands (908 Heavd an ) y Industry (901 Preservation/Resourco t ) e Area (941 conforo t ) e th mo t Mineral Resource designatio Opee th n no Spac Conservatiod quarre ean th r yfo sitp enMa located on the west side of the San Pablo Peninsula east of Western Drive and about one- quarter mile Richmond-Sae nortth f ho n Rafael Bridge toll plaza. revisiop (3Ma ) Figurn no e B-8, Flood Zones Map Technican i , l Appendix (Vol , Sectio2) . , nB Survey of Natural Factors, updating Flood Zone Map in the North Richmond area to reflect flood control improvements and to conform to the November 1 7, 1993 Flood Insurance Rate Map. 018.GP 96-3 Resolution #169-96 11/5/96 Description: Portion f Richmonso d changing 4 Annex f o revisionp 4 p Ma : : Ma Lann e so dUs (1) land use designation from Medium Density Residential (918; 9 to 28 DU/net acre) to Low Density Residential (91 7; 5 to 9 DU/net acre) for: a) properties fronting on the east side of San Benit betwee. oSt n Teham Burlingamd aan parcelo etw Avenuesr o s firs e e locateth on t ) b ; d immediately west of the San Pablo Avenue commercial strip between Plumas Ave. and south Josn side Sa propertie) Ave.f c e o d ;an s frontin ease th t n sidgo f Souteo h 56t betwee. hSt e nth north side of Santa Clara St. and Mariposa St. (2) landesignatioe dus n froDensitw mLo y Residential DU/ne(9179 o t ;5 t acre Recreatioo )t n Land sMendocine (908th r fo ) o Playlot locatewese th tn dsido f Mendocineo . betweeoSt n Burlingam Tehamd ean a Avenue Huntingtoe th d san n Playlot locate northwese th n do t corner of Carlson Blvd. and Huntington Ave and to Public and Institutional (964) for the Annex Senior Center locate northease th n do t corne f Santo r aHuntingtod Claran . aSt n Ave. (3) land use designation from Recreation Lands (908) to Public and Institutional (964) the north ½ and easterly ¼ of the Balboa School site bordered by Madison and Jefferson Avenues and South 56t Soutd han h 57th Streets. (4) land use designation from General Commercial (922) to Medium Density Residential (918; 9 to 28 DU/net acre) the western half of the parcel located on the southwest corner of Bayview Pabln Sa od Avenuesan . (5) land use designation from Low Density Residential (91 7; 5 to 9 DU/net acre) to Medium Density Residential (918; 9 to 28 DU/net acre) the southern half of parcel located at the souther f Weno d knen Avenue. (Note correctioA : alss onwa mad t thiea s tim o Lanet Elemente Us d , Area Specific Guidelines, Shoreline Areas-West Shoreline, Guideline 10. An error in the wording was made at the time this Guideline was added to the Plan, 018.GP 95-3; the correction was made to reflect the wording approved by the City Council). 1998 018.GP 98-1 Resolution #69-98 5/12/98 Description: Rifle Range Roa Vistd dan a Heights Roadp revisionMa . : (1) establish Land Use Element Map 5 of 5 and technical corrections to change the land use designatio 573-040-2N AP r nfo 4 fro designatioo mn Vero nDensitt w yLo y Residential (0-5 du/ac). (2) technical correction chango t 5 f lan e Landesignatioo sElemeno t e e th 5 dus d Us p Ma t n for APN 573-141-01 thru-49, 573-141-52, 573-141-53, 573-150-01 thru -21, 573-150-23, 573-150-25 fro designatioo mn Mediuo nt m Density Residential (9-28 du/ac). (3) technical correction chango t 5 f landesignatioe Lan o so Elemene t e th 5 dus d Us p Ma t n for APN 573-150-24 from no designation to Regional Parks and Facilities. (4) remove a 0.35 acre parcel (APN 573-040-24) from the area designated as Regional Parks Facilitied an Open so n Spac Conservatiod ean . 1 n f o Elemen 1 p Ma t (5) amend Open Space and Conservation Element Map 1 of 1 to include a 0.32 acre parcel (APN 573-150-24) designate Regionas da l Park Facilitiesd san . (6) retitl Richmone eth d General Plan LanMape dUs throug s1 identifo t h4 y the mapss ma 1 of 5, 2 of 5, 3 of 5, and 4 of 5, respectively. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Richmond City Council Rosemar . CorbinyM , Mayor Lonnie Washington, Jr., Vice Mayor Irma L. Anderson Richard L. Griffin Joh . MarquenE z James McMillan LaVonne Niccolls Donn . PoweraR s Jim Rogers George Livingston (Former Mayor) David MacDiarmid (Former Council member) John Ziesenhenne (Former Council member) Richmond Planning Commission Steve . HarveynE , Chairperson Rev. Orenzia Bernstine Murie . Ealy-BrowA l n John Edwards Joh . FeldenH r Virgini . FinlaaG y Joe Lee Fisher, Sr. Susan H. Geick Meadie Jackson Elva Blankenship (former Commissioner) Michael De La Garza (former Commissioner) Hamilton Holmes (former Commissioner) Sidne . PuceyS k (former Commissioner) Charle . RamsesT y (former Commissioner) Ron Rhone (former Commissioner) Maria Viramontes (former Commissioner) General Plan Update Team (City Staff) Planning Department: Jim Farah, Planning Director Nancy Kaufman, Principal Planner Katherine Cannon Yvonne Bayless Ruby Benjamin Brian Cooke Rod Jones Natalia Lawrence Teresa Stirling Leon Sun Larry Sutton La'Teresa Tingle Ramona Young City Attorney's Office: Wayne Nishioka City Manager's Office: Leveron Bryant Raymond Lambert Finance Department: Tonh ySu Fire Department: Floyd Cormier Human Services Department: Diane Harrison Leo Sauceda Management Information Systems: Mark Hamilton Police Department: Ray Howard Port of Richmond: Jim Faber Mike Powers Private Industry Council: Upesi Mtambuzi Public Works Department: Fred Clement, Building Regulations Division Kirt Hunter, Traffi Engineerind an c g Division Richmond Housing Authority: Art Hatchett Richmond Redevelopment Agency: Harriette Langston Marshall Walker Theresa Wilkerson Consultants Geotechnical Study of El Sobrante Valley: Alien Kropp & Associates, Inc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • C<Uoln I£ »-I<;U Q£O SKU Op <U Rtf Uu> L, . 3 Kl 5 Z
    c <u o Ln I £ f—i »-i <; u Z Q O £ p o < S u K Z U 3 rtf 2 §u u > L, u £ a o . 3 Kl 5 z « £ > r A couple of visits by you to City Council meetings on June 2 and June 9 will almost certainly mean $15*000 worth of free hot lunches for Washington School children next year. On June 2 the Community Development Commission recom­ mendation to spend $1 5 ,0 0 0 next year for these children will be on Council agenda. The Council will probably send it to committee. The staff will probably recommend its passage and also funding for free hot lunches for two other schools. Then it will probably come up for a vote June 9 or maybe June 1 6 . We are doing trail-breaking work here. These lunches will be paid for by Federal block-grant funds and matched by Federal Nutri­ tion funds. The city has the money because the Potrero project cost less than expected. It won't cost the school district a cent. And it won't raise your property taxes. Thirty-three percent (33%) of these kids are on welfare. But they are our kids - they go to school in our community. Our community includes these children as well as people who are threatened by ammonia tanks. So even if you don't have children, and maybe especially if you don't have children - PLEAoE GO TO THESE MEETINGS. You people in Brickyard Cove - and on Western Drive - the councilmen know who you are.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority
    Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Prepared By: 1625 Shattuck Avenue Suite 300 Berkeley, California 94709 510.848.3815 ORANGE COUNTY • BAY AREA • SACRAMENTO • CENTRAL COAST • LOS ANGELES • INLAND EMPIRE • SAN DIEGO www.placeworks.com Table of Contents List of Figures & Tables ii Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 13 1.1 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Lifeline Transportation Program 13 1.2 CBTP Guidelines 14 1.3 2004 Richmond-Area CBTP 15 1.4 Current Richmond Area CBTP 15 1.5 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 17 2. Study Area Profile 18 2.1 Demographic Analysis 18 2.2 Transportation Patterns 24 2.3 Transportation Network 28 3. Previous Studies and Mobility Gaps 33 3.1 Local Studies 33 3.2 Countywide Studies 37 3.3 Current Studies 39 3.4 Thematic Mobility Challenges 40 4. Outreach and Engagement Summary 43 4.1 CBTP Advisor Groups 43 4.2 Outreach Strategy 44 4.3 Outreach Awareness 44 4.4 Outreach Results 46 4.5 Outreach Summary 54 5. Methodology and Recommendations 56 5.1 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 56 5.2 Evaluation Criteria 57 5.3 Evaluation Process 60 5.4 Recommended Projects and Plans 62 Appendix A Existing Conditions Report Appendix B Outreach Materials and Results Appendix C Recommendations Scoring Results Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan i Contra Costa Transportation Authority List of Figures
    [Show full text]
  • Pinolecreeksedimentfinal
    Pinole Creek Watershed Sediment Source Assessment January 2005 Prepared by the San Francisco Estuary Institute for USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and Contra Costa Resource Conservation District San Francisco Estuary Institute The Regional Watershed Program was founded in 1998 to assist local and regional environmental management and the public to understand, characterize and manage environmental resources in the watersheds of the Bay Area. Our intent is to help develop a regional picture of watershed condition and downstream effects through a solid foundation of literature review and peer- review, and the application of a range of science methodologies, empirical data collection and interpretation in watersheds around the Bay Area. Over this time period, the Regional Watershed Program has worked with Bay Area local government bodies, universities, government research organizations, Resource Conservation Districts (RCDs) and local community and environmental groups in the Counties of Marin, Sonoma, Napa, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo, and San Francisco. We have also fulfilled technical advisory roles for groups doing similar work outside the Bay Area. This report should be referenced as: Pearce, S., McKee, L., and Shonkoff, S., 2005. Pinole Creek Watershed Sediment Source Assessment. A technical report of the Regional Watershed Program, San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI), Oakland, California. SFEI Contribution no. 316, 102 pp. ii San Francisco Estuary Institute ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Northern California by Jean Richmond
    BIRDING NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Site Guides to 72 of the Best Birding Spots by Jean Richmond Written for Mt. Diablo Audubon Society 1985 Dedicated to my husband, Rich Cover drawing by Harry Adamson Sketches by Marv Reif Graphics by dk graphics © 1985, 2008 Mt. Diablo Audubon Society All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means without prior permission of MDAS. P.O. Box 53 Walnut Creek, California 94596 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . How To Use This Guide .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Birding Etiquette .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Terminology. Park Information .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 One Last Word. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 Map Symbols Used. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Acknowledgements .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Map With Numerical Index To Guides .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 The Guides. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 Where The Birds Are. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 158 Recommended References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 165 Index Of Birding Locations. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 166 5 6 Birding Northern California This book is a guide to many birding areas in northern California, primarily within 100 miles of the San Francisco Bay Area and easily birded on a one-day outing. Also included are several favorite spots which local birders
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 NHPA Annual Report
    January 30, 2017 Julianne Polanco, State Historic Preservation Officer Attention: Mark Beason Office of Historic Preservation 1725 23rd Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95816 John Fowler, Executive Director Attention: Najah Duvall Office of Federal Agency Programs Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 401 F Street NW, Suite 308 Washington, DC 20001 Laura Joss, Regional Director Attention: Elaine Jackson-Retondo National Park Service – Pacific West Regional Office 333 Bush Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Craig Kenkel, Acting Superintendent Attention: Steve Haller Golden Gate National Recreation Area Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Reference: 2016 Annual Report on Activities under the 2014 Presidio Trust Programmatic Agreement, the Presidio of San Francisco National Historic Landmark District, San Francisco, California Pursuant to Stipulation XIV of the Presidio Trust Programmatic Agreement (PTPA, 2014), enclosed is the 2016 Annual Report of activities conducted under that PA. In 2016, the Presidio Trust celebrated the 50th anniversary of the National Historic Preservation Act alongside the nation’s preservation community with a sense of reflection, gratitude and forward-looking purpose. We were also pleased to commemorate the centennial anniversary of the National Park Service, and thank our partners for their trailblazing role in preserving American cultural heritage here in California and beyond. Our principal activity for recognizing these milestones was to host the 41st annual California Preservation Foundation conference at the Presidio in April. At the conference we were enormously proud to be recognized by CPF president Kelly Sutherlin McLeod as “perhaps the biggest preservation success story of the 20th century”, praise that would not be possible without the contributions of our partner agencies, tenants and park users.
    [Show full text]
  • 6284 SAN PABLO DAM Single-Family Residential EL SOBRANTE | CALIFORNIA 7 Lots | 2.57 Acres OFFERING MEMORANDUM
    Final Map Ready 6284 SAN PABLO DAM Single-Family Residential EL SOBRANTE | CALIFORNIA 7 Lots | 2.57 Acres OFFERING MEMORANDUM Accelerating success. DISCLAIMER STATEMENT This Offering Memorandum (“Memorandum”) was prepared by Colliers International (“Colliers”) as part of Collier’s efforts to market for sale the real property commonly known as 6284 San Pablo Dam Road, El Sobrante (the “Property”). Colliers is the exclusive agent and broker for the owner of the Property (the “Owner”). Colliers is providing this Memorandum and the material contained in it to prospective buyer (each a “Buyer”) solely to assist Buyer in determining whether Buyer is interested in potentially purchasing all or part of the Property. Colliers is also providing this Memorandum and the material in it to Buyer with the understanding that Buyer will independently investigate those matters that it deems necessary and appropriate to evaluate the Property and that Buyer will rely only on its own investigation, and not on Colliers, the Owner, or this Memorandum, in determining whether or not to purchase the Property. This Memorandum is a solicitation of interest only and is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, an interest in the Property. Owner expressly reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to reject any or all expressions of interest or offers to purchase the Property and expressly reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate discussions with any potential Buyer at any time with or without notice. Owner shall have no legal commitment or obligation to any party reviewing the Memorandum or making an offer to purchase the Property unless and until a written real estate purchase and sale agreement is executed by Owner and Buyer.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021
    Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021 Reasonable care is given in gathering, compiling and furnishing the information contained herein which is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Planroom is not responsible or liable for errors, omissions or inaccuracies. Plan# Name Bid Date & Time OPR# Location Estimate Project Type Monday, August 16, 2021 OUTREACH MEETING (VIRTUAL) EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE (EVC) STUDENT SERVICES Addenda: 0 COMPLEX (REQUEST FOR SUB BIDS) SC 8/16/21 10:00 AM 21-02526 San Jose School ONLINE Plan Issuer: XL Construction 408-240-6000 408-240-6001 THIS IS A VIRTUAL OUTREACH MEETING. REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED. SEE FLYER FOR DETAILS. The 74,000 sf Student Services Complex at Evergreen Valley College is part of the San Jose Evergreen Community College District's Measure X Bond Program. This is a new ground-up two -story complex including collaboration spaces, offices, storage, restrooms and supporting facilities. All subcontractors must be prequalified with XL Construction to bid the project. Please email [email protected] for a prequalification application link, and [email protected] if you are an Under Utilized Business Enterprise (SBE, WBE, MBE, VBE...). REFINISHING GYM AND STAGE FLOORS AT CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND Addenda: 0 8/16/21 12:00 PM 21-02463 Fremont State-Federal Plan Issuer: California Department of Education - Personnel Service Division 916-319-0800 000-000-0000 Contract #: BF210152 The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment and materials necessary for preparing and refinishing the stage and gym floors, twice a year, at the California School for the Blind (CSB), located at 500 Walnut Avenue, Fremont.
    [Show full text]
  • Contra Costa County
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Marsh Creek Watershed Marsh Creek flows approximately 30 miles from the eastern slopes of Mt. Diablo to Suisun Bay in the northern San Francisco Estuary. Its watershed consists of about 100 square miles. The headwaters of Marsh Creek consist of numerous small, intermittent and perennial tributaries within the Black Hills. The creek drains to the northwest before abruptly turning east near Marsh Creek Springs. From Marsh Creek Springs, Marsh Creek flows in an easterly direction entering Marsh Creek Reservoir, constructed in the 1960s. The creek is largely channelized in the lower watershed, and includes a drop structure near the city of Brentwood that appears to be a complete passage barrier. Marsh Creek enters the Big Break area of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta northeast of the city of Oakley. Marsh Creek No salmonids were observed by DFG during an April 1942 visual survey of Marsh Creek at two locations: 0.25 miles upstream from the mouth in a tidal reach, and in close proximity to a bridge four miles east of Byron (Curtis 1942).
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Packet
    June 1, 2021 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Board Meeting Packet SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JUNE 1, 2021 at 1:00 pm Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20 and the Alameda County Health Officer’s Shelter in Place Orders, the East Bay Regional Park District Headquarters will not be open to the public and the Board of Directors and staff will be participating in the Board meetings via phone/video conferencing. Members of the public can listen and view the meeting in the following way: Via the Park District’s live video stream which can be found at https://youtu.be/md2gdzkkvVg Public comments may be submitted one of three ways: 1. Via email to Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected]. Email must contain in the subject line public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item #. It is preferred that these written comments be submitted by Monday, May 31, 2021 at 3:00 pm. 2. Via voicemail at (510) 544-2016. The caller must start the message by stating public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item # followed by their name and place of residence, followed by their comments. It is preferred that these voicemail comments be submitted by Monday, May 31, 2021 at 3:00 pm. 3. Live via zoom. If you would like to make a live public comment during the meeting this option is available through the virtual meeting platform: *Note: this virtual meeting platform link will let you into the https://zoom.us/j/94773173402 virtual meeting for the purpose of providing a public comment.
    [Show full text]
  • East Bay Regional Park District 2005 Budget
    EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT 2005 BUDGET January 1 to December 31, 2005 2005 Adopted Budget Page 1 East Bay Regional Park District Page Intentionally Left Blank 2005 Adopted Budget Page 2 East Bay Regional Park District TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION AND MISSION STATEMENTS .......................................................................... 7 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT MAP .............................................................. 9 HOW TO USE THIS BOOK............................................................................................ 11 SECTION A – GENERAL MANAGER’S MESSAGE..................................................... 13 SECTION B – BUDGET OVERVIEW ............................................................................ 21 BUDGET AT-A-GLANCE .................................................................................... 29 TOTAL RESOURCES BY CATEGORY AND MAJOR CHANGES ..................... 30 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS BY CATEGORY AND MAJOR CHANGES ............ 34 BUDGET BY FUND ............................................................................................ 37 BUDGET BY DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT .................................................... 38 AUTHORIZATION POSITIONS BY DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT ................. 40 GENERAL FUND ................................................................................................ 41 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS ............................................................................. 47 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Plan
    San Francisco Bay Plan San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission In memory of Senator J. Eugene McAteer, a leader in efforts to plan for the conservation of San Francisco Bay and the development of its shoreline. Photo Credits: Michael Bry: Inside front cover, facing Part I, facing Part II Richard Persoff: Facing Part III Rondal Partridge: Facing Part V, Inside back cover Mike Schweizer: Page 34 Port of Oakland: Page 11 Port of San Francisco: Page 68 Commission Staff: Facing Part IV, Page 59 Map Source: Tidal features, salt ponds, and other diked areas, derived from the EcoAtlas Version 1.0bc, 1996, San Francisco Estuary Institute. STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 50 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2600 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 PHONE: (415) 352-3600 January 2008 To the Citizens of the San Francisco Bay Region and Friends of San Francisco Bay Everywhere: The San Francisco Bay Plan was completed and adopted by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission in 1968 and submitted to the California Legislature and Governor in January 1969. The Bay Plan was prepared by the Commission over a three-year period pursuant to the McAteer-Petris Act of 1965 which established the Commission as a temporary agency to prepare an enforceable plan to guide the future protection and use of San Francisco Bay and its shoreline. In 1969, the Legislature acted upon the Commission’s recommendations in the Bay Plan and revised the McAteer-Petris Act by designating the Commission as the agency responsible for maintaining and carrying out the provisions of the Act and the Bay Plan for the protection of the Bay and its great natural resources and the development of the Bay and shore- line to their highest potential with a minimum of Bay fill.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildcat Creek Restoration Action Plan Version 1.3 April 26, 2010 Prepared by the URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL
    wildcat creek restoration action plan version 1.3 April 26, 2010 prepared by THE URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL Adopted by the City of San Pablo on August 3, 2010 wildcat creek restoration action plan table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 plan obJectives 5 1.2 scope 6 Urban Urban 1.5 Methods 8 1.5 Metadata c 10 reeks 2. WATERSHED OVERVIEW 12 c 2.1 introdUction o 12 U 2.2 watershed land Use ncil 13 2.3 iMpacts of Urbanized watersheds 17 april 2.4 hydrology 19 2.5 sediMent transport 22 2010 2.6 water qUality 24 2.7 habitat 26 2.8 flood ManageMent on lower wildcat creek 29 2.9 coMMUnity 32 3. PROJECT AREA ANALYSIS 37 3.1 overview 37 3.2 flooding 37 3.4 in-streaM conditions 51 3.5 sUMMer fish habitat 53 3.6 bioassessMent 57 4. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 58 4.1 obJectives, findings and strategies 58 4.2 recoMMended actions according to strategy 61 4.3 streaM restoration recoMMendations by reach 69 4.4 recoMMended actions for phase one reaches 73 t 4.5 phase one flood daMage redUction reach 73 able of 4.6 recoMMended actions for watershed coUncil 74 c ontents version 1.3 april 26, 2010 2 wildcat creek restoration action plan Urban creeks coUncil april 2010 table of contents 3 figUre 1-1: wildcat watershed overview to Point Pinole Regional Shoreline wildcat watershed existing trail wildcat creek highway railroad city of san pablo planned trail other creek arterial road bart Parkway SAN PABLO Richmond BAY Avenue San Pablo Point UP RR San Pablo WEST COUNTY BNSF RR CITY OF LANDFILL NORTH SAN PABLO RICHMOND San Pablo
    [Show full text]