Laboratory Biosafety Manual Second Edition (Revised)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Laboratory Biosafety Manual Second Edition (Revised) WHO/CDS/CSR/LYO/2003.4 LABORATORY BIOSAFETY MANUAL SECOND EDITION (REVISED) interim guidelines WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION Geneva 2003 interim guidelines © World Health Organization 2003 This publication is not a formal publication of the World Health Organization (WHO), and all rights are reserved by the Organization. The publication may, however, be freely reviewed, abstracted, reproduced and translated, in part or in whole, but not for sale or for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. The views expressed in publications by named authors are solely the responsibility of those authors. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication, including tables and maps, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the secretariat of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers' products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by WHO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. WHO/CDS/CSR/LYO/2003.4 Contents Foreword......................................................................................................................................................v Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................vii 1. General principles............................................................................................................................... 1 PART I Guidelines 2. Risk assessment................................................................................................................................. 7 Specimens for which there is limited information .............................................................................. 7 Risk assessment and genetically modified microorganisms ............................................................. 8 3. Basic laboratories – Biosafety Levels 1 and 2............................................................................... 10 Code of practice............................................................................................................................... 10 Laboratory design and facilities ....................................................................................................... 11 Laboratory equipment...................................................................................................................... 13 Health and medical surveillance ...................................................................................................... 13 Training ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Waste handling ................................................................................................................................ 14 Chemical, fire, electrical and radiation safety .................................................................................. 16 4. The containment laboratory – Biosafety Level 3........................................................................... 17 Code of practice............................................................................................................................... 17 Laboratory design and facilities ....................................................................................................... 17 Laboratory equipment...................................................................................................................... 18 Health and medical surveillance ...................................................................................................... 18 5. The maximum containment laboratory – Biosafety Level 4 ......................................................... 20 Laboratory design and facilities ....................................................................................................... 20 Laboratory biosafety manual ........................................................................................................... 21 6. Laboratory animal facilitiesinterim ................................................................................................. guidelines ............ 22 Animal facility – Biosafety Level 1 ................................................................................................... 22 Animal facility – Biosafety Level 2 ................................................................................................... 23 Animal facility – Biosafety Level 3 ................................................................................................... 23 Animal facility – Biosafety Level 4 ................................................................................................... 24 Invertebrates .................................................................................................................................... 24 PART II Laboratory equipment 7. Biological safety cabinets................................................................................................................ 29 Class I biological safety cabinet....................................................................................................... 30 Class II biological safety cabinets.................................................................................................... 30 Class III biological safety cabinet..................................................................................................... 32 Biological safety cabinet air connections......................................................................................... 33 Selection of a biological safety cabinet............................................................................................ 33 Using biological safety cabinets in the laboratory............................................................................ 34 8. Equipment-related hazards.............................................................................................................. 37 Equipment that may create a hazard............................................................................................... 37 i Laboratory Biosafety Manual, 2nd revised edition WHO/CDS/CSR/LYO/2003.4 9. Equipment designed to reduce biological hazards....................................................................... 39 Negative-pressure flexible-film isolators.......................................................................................... 40 Pipetting aids ................................................................................................................................... 40 Homogenizers, shakers, blenders and sonicators........................................................................... 41 Disposable transfer loops ................................................................................................................ 41 Microincinerators.............................................................................................................................. 41 Personal protective clothing and equipment.................................................................................... 41 PART III Good microbiological technique 10. Safe laboratory techniques.............................................................................................................. 45 Safe handling of specimens in the laboratory.................................................................................. 45 Use of pipettes and pipetting aids.................................................................................................... 45 Avoiding the dispersal of infectious materials..................................................................................46 Use of biological safety cabinets ..................................................................................................... 46 Avoiding ingestion of infectious materials and contact with skin and eyes ..................................... 46 Avoiding injection of infectious materials......................................................................................... 47 Separation of serum ........................................................................................................................ 47 Use of centrifuges............................................................................................................................ 47 Use of homogenizers, shakers, blenders and sonicators................................................................ 48 Use of tissue grinders ...................................................................................................................... 48 Care and use of refrigerators and freezers......................................................................................48 Opening of ampoules containing lyophilized infectious materials ................................................... 48 Storage of ampoules containing infectious materials .....................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Exploring Small-Scale Chemostats to Scale up Microbial Processes: 3-Hydroxypropionic Acid Production in S
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title Exploring small-scale chemostats to scale up microbial processes: 3-hydroxypropionic acid production in S. cerevisiae. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/43h8866j Journal Microbial cell factories, 18(1) ISSN 1475-2859 Authors Lis, Alicia V Schneider, Konstantin Weber, Jost et al. Publication Date 2019-03-11 DOI 10.1186/s12934-019-1101-5 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Lis et al. Microb Cell Fact (2019) 18:50 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-019-1101-5 Microbial Cell Factories RESEARCH Open Access Exploring small-scale chemostats to scale up microbial processes: 3-hydroxypropionic acid production in S. cerevisiae Alicia V. Lis1, Konstantin Schneider1,2, Jost Weber1,3, Jay D. Keasling1,4,5,6,7, Michael Krogh Jensen1 and Tobias Klein1,2* Abstract Background: The physiological characterization of microorganisms provides valuable information for bioprocess development. Chemostat cultivations are a powerful tool for this purpose, as they allow defned changes to one single parameter at a time, which is most commonly the growth rate. The subsequent establishment of a steady state then permits constant variables enabling the acquisition of reproducible data sets for comparing microbial perfor- mance under diferent conditions. We performed physiological characterizations of a 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain in a miniaturized and parallelized chemostat cultivation system. The physi- ological conditions under investigation were various growth rates controlled by diferent nutrient limitations (C, N, P). Based on the cultivation parameters obtained subsequent fed-batch cultivations were designed. Results: We report technical advancements of a small-scale chemostat cultivation system and its applicability for reliable strain screening under diferent physiological conditions, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Microscope Compatible Cell-Culture Incubator
    Microscope Compatible Cell-Culture Incubator BME 400 December 14th, 2016 Client: Dr. John Puccinelli, UW-Madison Dept. of Biomedical Engineering Advisor: Dr. Mitchell Tyler, UW-Madison Dept. of Biomedical Engineering Team Members: Trevor Zarecki - Team Leader Jenny Westlund - Communicator Peter Hartig - BPAG Jack McGinnity - BWIG Steve Gock - BSAC Abstract Live cell imaging experiments are difficult to perform over long periods of time on normal lab microscopes without incubation capabilities. Current commercial microscope-stage incubators are expensive, not compatible with multiple microscopes and ineffective at evenly controlling the environment. The client desires an inexpensive incubation chamber compatible with cell microscopy that is capable of maintaining desired temperature, CO2, and humidity evenly throughout the chamber. The device should not alter image quality, and should be accessible for changing media or cell culture dishes. An initial prototype has been developed that involves a small, cohesive system to regulate temperature, CO2, and humidity. Testing of the current prototype has demonstrated regulation of these three systems, through an automated feedback system capable of maintaining the system near a physiological set point. Further development of the design will ensure that it performs efficiently according to all specifications, and ultimately help bridge the gap in the market between high-cost, functional incubation systems and cheaper, less effective designs. 1 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Motivation 3 Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Contamination Control with CO2 Incubators
    WHITE PAPER No. 30 Effective Contamination Control with CO2 Incubators Ines Kristina Hartmann¹, James Jarvis² ¹Eppendorf AG, ²Eppendorf, Inc. Executive Summary CO2 incubators provide an optimal cell growth environ- ment by maintaining a humidified atmosphere with temperature and carbon dioxide control. These conditions not only promote cell growth, but also the growth of contaminants, like bacteria, yeast, molds and other fungi. The contamination-reducing features of an incubator’s functional design and the effectiveness of its self-decon- tamination system must be considered in choosing an instrument. In this paper, we compare various strategies for preventing contamination in CO2 incubators, from the functional design of the device to self-disinfection programs. We also give some useful tips to prevent contamination when using CO2 incubators. Introduction Sources of contamination How do contaminants get into a CO2 incubator? Contamination is a major cause of frustration when culturing The CO2 incubator may become an indirect source of con- cells. There are many sources of contamination, either direct tamination. Unlike a biological safety cabinet, an incubator or indirect. Direct sources are contaminated reagents, media cannot prevent the influx of airborne contaminants, as the or seed culture. Media and reagents from reputable suppliers door must be opened during routine use. The incubator are rarely delivered contaminated nowadays. New cell lines chamber can also be contaminated by carelessness in aseptic can introduce contaminants into the lab, especially when techniques, and unnoticed splashes from cell culture vessels. they are given from lab to lab. They should be quarantined Some CO2 incubators use a HEPA filter to remove microor- before culturing with the rest of the cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiology Laboratory Exercises Third Edition 2020
    MICROBIOLOGY Laboratory Exercises Third Edition Keddis & Rauschenbach 2020 Photo Credits (in order of contribution): Diane Davis, Ines Rauschenbach & Ramaydalis Keddis Acknowledgements: Many thanks to those in the Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University, who have through the years inspired our enthusiasm for the science and teaching of microbiology, with special thanks to Diane Davis, Douglas Eveleigh and Max Häggblom. Safety: The experiments included in this manual have been deemed safe by the authors when all necessary safety precautions are met. The authors recommend maintaining biosafety level 2 in the laboratory setting and using risk level 1 organisms for all exercises. License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License Microbiology Laboratory Exercises Third Edition 2020 Ramaydalis Keddis, Ph.D. Ines Rauschenbach, Ph.D. Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey CONTENTS PAGE Introduction Schedule ii Best Laboratory Practices Iii Working in a Microbiology Laboratory iv Exercises Preparation of a Culture Medium 1 Culturing and Handling Microorganisms 3 Isolation of a Pure Culture 5 Counting Bacterial Populations 8 Controlling Microorganisms 10 Disinfectants 10 Antimicrobial Agents: Susceptibility Testing 12 Hand Washing 14 The Lethal Effects of Ultraviolet Light 15 Selection of Fungi from Air 17 Microscopy 21 Morphology and Staining of Bacteria 26 Microbial Metabolism 30 Enzyme Assay 32 Metabolic
    [Show full text]
  • Bezanilla Lab Moss Methods Manual
    Bezanilla Lab Moss Methods Manual April 2008 Updated July 2012 Contents 1. Tissue Propagation 3 2. Tissue Storage 8 3. Generating Protoplasts 9 4. Transformation 11 5. DNA Isolation 14 6. Protein Isolation 15 7. GUS Assays 17 8. RNA Interference 18 9. 2-Fragment Recombination for N- and -C terminal tagging 23 10. 3-Fragment Recombination for generating knock out constructs 24 11. 4-Fragment Recombination for generating knock in constructs 26 Appendix I – Moss Growth Media Recipes 31 Appendix II – Moss Transformation Reagents 35 Appendix III – Cloning Reactions 38 2 Tissue Propagation Moss tissue should be propagated weekly. For routine culturing of moss, the following unusual items are needed: Cellophanes Tissue homogenizer These items can be acquired from the following sources: Cellophanes: Gel drying cellophanes from Research Products International, catalog #1080 It is ideal to have the cellophanes cut in circles the appropriate size for standard disposable Petri dishes. It is possible to acquire a "hole" punch that will cut out circles of the correct size from the following arts and crafts site: http://www.1stopsquare.com/gigapunc.html Order the Paper Punch Craft, Marvy Uchida Giga - Circle 3". Tissue Homogenizer: Powergen 125 homogenizer – Fisher Scientific 14-261-02 Adaptor for disposable generators – Fisher Scientific 14-261-35 Disposable generators 110 mm in length – Fisher Scientific 14-261-26 These generators can be placed in glass culture tubes, covered with aluminum foil and autoclaved. After use they can be washed in water, air- dried and re-autoclaved. Typically these generators can be re- autoclaved at least 20 times.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 CATALOG the Homogenizer Company™
    The Homogenizer Company™ 2015 CATALOG Innovative Solutions Omni International’s homogenizers have been a laboratory staple for over 50 years. Omni sets the indus- try standard with a commitment to outstanding design, performance and a uniquely diversified solution- based product line. We offer a complete portfolio of homogenizers designed for pharmaceutical, life science, biotechnology, agricultural, microbiology and chemical research and development. Our business is strictly homogenizer-focused and we offer the broadest range of solutions to process any sample, including high shear, ultrasonic, mortar and pestle, and bead mill homogenizers. In response to increased activity in global infectious disease research, Omni was first in designing and developing a patented plastic disposable generator probe, the Omni Tip™, which completely eliminates cross-contamination between samples. Our multi-sample and automated homogenizers set the standard by removing the repetitive labor-intensive work of processing samples one at a time. Customer Service Our staff of engineers and technicians are dedicated to finding solutions that improve sample processing, reduce noise, and improve sample processing efficiency, while our support team works to assure that we routinely exceed our customers’ expectations. We are confident that you will find our products and service superior to others. Omni International offers no-risk product evaluations for your convenience. Quality and Convenience Omni products offer the most cost-effective choice for quality, service, and convenience to effectively and ef- ficiently process all types of sample preparation applications, usually in 30 seconds or less. We offer the broadest choice of accessories to process the widest range of samples with user-friendly designs that are easy to clean and maintain.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Personal Protective Equipment for Laboratories
    Common Personal Protective Equipment The following document is to provide general guidance for common types of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) within a laboratory. PPE should be selected based on the hazards present and task performed and is a last line of defense to protect personnel from hazards. All PPE has limitations. If there are any specific questions regarding PPE, please consult your Principal Investigator, the Laboratory Safety Unit, or the University’s Personal Protective Equipment Program. Please contact EH&S with questions regarding PPE selection and hazard assessments. Face and Eye Protection: Must be ANSI Z87.1 compliant Type of PPE: General Uses: Limitations Vapor Goggles • Conforms tight to the • Not designed face for impact • Fully seals around the protection eyes to protect against • Limited splash vapors protection • Protection from heavy particulates (wood/sand/debris) Safety Glasses • Eye protection from • Not designed impact and larger for vapor foreign objects protection • Minimal splash protection Laser Safety • Laser and wavelength • Not designed Glasses/Goggles specific eye protection for vapor or • Must meet current ANSI splash Z136.1 requirements protection and be clearly labeled with optical densities (OD) and wavelength Face Shield • Used for full face splash • Not designed protection for vapor • Available in chin, full protection face, or neck length • Certain types can be used for UV and radiological isotopes protection Environmental Health & Safety 1 of 4 May 2021 Glove Protection: Type of PPE: General Uses: Limitations Nitrile Gloves • Disposable, one-time • May not protect use against • General barrier hydrocarbons protection, allows for and alcohols. Nitrile good dexterity Consult a hand alternatives protection are discussed chart, like here.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Guidance for Microbiology Incubators
    DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Laboratory Accreditation Program Document Number: # Title: Microbiology Incubator Guidance Effective Date: Date Authority: 27 Pa.C.S. §§ 4101 – 4113 (relating to environmental laboratory accreditation), Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Regulations, 25 Pa. Code Chapter 252 Policy: It is the policy of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to provide laboratory management personnel with the information necessary to either obtain or maintain accreditation to perform and report environmental analyses in Pennsylvania. Purpose: This technical guidance will provide laboratory management with the tools to develop procedures for maintenance and verification of incubation units used for microbiological testing that meet the requirements for laboratory accreditation. Applicability: This guidance will apply to all laboratories desiring to obtain and/or maintain accreditation under 25 Pa. Code Chapter 252. Disclaimer: The policies and procedures outlined in this guidance document are intended to supplement existing requirements. Nothing in the policies or procedures will affect regulatory requirements. The policies and procedures herein are not an adjudication or a regulation. There is no intent on the part of the Department to give these rules that weight or deference. This document establishes the framework within which DEP will exercise its administrative discretion in the future. DEP reserves the discretion to deviate from this policy statement if circumstances
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Equipment Reference Sheet
    Laboratory Equipment Stirring Rod: Reference Sheet: Iron Ring: Description: Glass rod. Uses: To stir combinations; To use in pouring liquids. Evaporating Dish: Description: Iron ring with a screw fastener; Several Sizes Uses: To fasten to the ring stand as a support for an apparatus Description: Porcelain dish. Buret Clamp/Test Tube Clamp: Uses: As a container for small amounts of liquids being evaporated. Glass Plate: Description: Metal clamp with a screw fastener, swivel and lock nut, adjusting screw, and a curved clamp. Uses: To hold an apparatus; May be fastened to a ring stand. Mortar and Pestle: Description: Thick glass. Uses: Many uses; Should not be heated Description: Heavy porcelain dish with a grinder. Watch Glass: Uses: To grind chemicals to a powder. Spatula: Description: Curved glass. Uses: May be used as a beaker cover; May be used in evaporating very small amounts of Description: Made of metal or porcelain. liquid. Uses: To transfer solid chemicals in weighing. Funnel: Triangular File: Description: Metal file with three cutting edges. Uses: To scratch glass or file. Rubber Connector: Description: Glass or plastic. Uses: To hold filter paper; May be used in pouring Description: Short length of tubing. Medicine Dropper: Uses: To connect parts of an apparatus. Pinch Clamp: Description: Glass tip with a rubber bulb. Uses: To transfer small amounts of liquid. Forceps: Description: Metal clamp with finger grips. Uses: To clamp a rubber connector. Test Tube Rack: Description: Metal Uses: To pick up or hold small objects. Beaker: Description: Rack; May be wood, metal, or plastic. Uses: To hold test tubes in an upright position.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Droplet Size Reduction and Excellent Stability of Limonene
    colloids and interfaces Article Effective Droplet Size Reduction and Excellent Stability of Limonene Nanoemulsion Formed by High-Pressure Homogenizer Marcel Jonathan Hidajat 1 , Wantaek Jo 2, Hyeonhyo Kim 2 and Jongho Noh 2,* 1 Department of Research and Development, Hiflux Co. Ltd., 361-33, Gapcheon-ro, Daejeon 34037, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Research and Development, Ilshin Autoclave Co. Ltd., 255, Techno 2-ro, Daejeon 34026, Korea; jowt@suflux.com (W.J.); hh@suflux.com (H.K.) * Correspondence: njh@suflux.com; Tel.: +82-42-9316100 Received: 18 December 2019; Accepted: 8 January 2020; Published: 10 January 2020 Abstract: Limonene as an interesting bioactive material that has great benefits due to its antimicrobial and anti-carcinogen properties. However, it has several limitations such as its oxidative and oily nature. In order to overcome these limitations, a high-pressure homogenizer (HPH) was utilized to produce limonene nanoemulsion, which enhances its dispersibility while preventing oxidation with great stability. Limonene was pre-mixed with soybean oil as carrier oil prior to emulsification. The effect of soybean oil to limonene ratio, number of pass, homogenization pressure, emulsifier concentration and homogenization method were observed. A stability test was also conducted for 28 days at room temperature. The result revealed that soybean oil and limonene demonstrated a certain ratio to produce the most stable nanoemulsion. Meanwhile, emulsion size could be reduced from 327.8 nm to 55.5 nm in five passes at 1000 bar. Increasing the emulsifier concentration could reduce the droplet size to 40 nm. A comparison with other emulsification method showed that HPH was the best emulsification technique due to its intense emulsification power resulted from shear, cavitation, and droplet impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosafety Level 2 Guide University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    Biosafety Level 2 Guide University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Risk Assessments .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Routes of Exposure ................................................................................................................................... 3 Risk Groups and Biosafety Levels .............................................................................................................. 4 IBC Registrations ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Laboratory Audits...................................................................................................................................... 5 Risk Assessment Scenarios ........................................................................................................................ 5 Training requirements .................................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction to Biosafety .......................................................................................................................... 7 NIH Guidelines Overview .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodamine B Lipase/Esterase Agar
    ALKEN-MURRAY CORPORATION TI TLE: RHODA M INE B A GA R NO. QC-99 PREPARA TI ON PROCEDURE MICROBIOLOGICAL DIVISION QUALITY CONTROL REV : 3 PAGE 1 OF 4 ALKEN-MURRAY CORPORATION P. O. Box 400, New Hyde Park, NY 11040 TELEPHONE 540-636-1236 - Fax 540-636-1770 QUALITY CONTROL METHOD - 99 Preparation and Use of Rhodamine B Lipase Agar Description: This quality control procedure is designed to verify that Rhodamine B Agar is properly prepared, used and stored. This procedure demonstrates the ability of some bacteria to produce lipase and degrade food oils, such as olive oil, in a clear and easily interpreted manner. We found that the Spirit Blue method (QC-94) was harder to interpret, leading to misinterpreted results. This procedure should be performed by a trained laboratory technician. Ingredients: For lipoidal emulsion (50 ml per 450 ml of base medium) - enough lipoidal emulsion for 1 liter: Olive oil 30 ml Tween 80 250 µl Distilled water 50 ml 1 Rhodamine B 20 mg/20 ml sterile water (0.02% w/v total media prepared) 1. Add filter sterilized Rhodamine B solution, after autoclaving other ingredients For base medium: Nutrient Broth 4.5 g (alternate Peptone water) Yeast extract 1.25 g Agar 10 g Distilled water 450 ml Final pH 7.0 ± 0.2 Equipment and Supplies: 500 ml Graduated cylinder 50 ml Graduated cylinder 1 ml sterile syringe with 18 gauge needle 10 ml sterile syringe with 18 gauge needle 10 ml sterile serological pipet Drummond Pipet-Aid® or rubber bulb 2 - 50 ml sterile serological pipets ALKEN-MURRAY CORPORATION TI TLE: RHODA M INE B A GA R NO.
    [Show full text]