CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM for A/R CDM project activities (CDM-AR-PDD) (VERSION 05)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION A. General description of the proposed A/R CDM project activity 2 SECTION B. Duration of the project activity / crediting period 19 SECTION C. Application of an approved baseline and monitoring methodology 20 SECTION D. Estimation of ex ante actual net GHG removals by sinks, leakage, and estimated amount of net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks over the chosen crediting period 26 SECTION E. Monitoring plan 33 SECTION F. Environmental impacts of the proposed A/R CDM project activity 43 SECTION G. Socio-economic impacts of the proposed A/R CDM project activity 44 SECTION H. Stakeholders’ comments 45 ANNEX 1: CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROPOSED A/R CDM PROJECT ACTIVITY 50 ANNEX 2: INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING 51 ANNEX 3: BASELINE INFORMATION 51 ANNEX 4: MONITORING PLAN 51 ANNEX 5: COORDINATES OF PROJECT BOUNDARY 52 ANNEX 6: PHASES OF PROJECT´S CAMPAIGNS 78 ANNEX 7: SCHEDULE OF CINEMA-MEETINGS 81 ANNEX 8: STATEMENTS OF THE DNA 86 ANNEX 9: LETTER OF THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT REGARDING EIA 88 ANNEX 10: RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES 89 ANNEX 11: ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT PHASES 91

SECTION A. General description of the proposed A/R CDM project activity

A.1. Title of the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> Title: Oceanium mangrove restoration project Version of the document: 01 Date of the document: November 10 2010.

A.2. Description of the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> The proposed A/R CDM project activity plans to establish 1700 ha of mangrove plantations on currently degraded wetlands in the Sine Saloum and Casamance deltas, Senegal. Carbon dioxide will be removed from the atmosphere and stored in carbon pools within the project boundary through the photosynthesis of the planted trees.

Background

The Project is being financed by the Danone Group through the “DANONE FUND for NATURE”. The “DANONE FUND for NATURE” is co-managed through a partnership established between Danone, the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with an interest in promoting wetlands all over the world. IUCN is supporting the project activities at a scientific level, while the Ramsar Convention is using the project activities as a pilot to promote wetlands environmental services in the framework of Climate Change mitigation. This partnership also addresses poverty alleviation with a special focus on poor communities depending on natural resources. Thus, the project is organized around conservation, restoration and sustainable management of ecosystems.

Oceanium, a Senegalese NGO created in 1984 with years of expertise in the environment conservation, will implement the project with local communities. During 2007 Oceanium developed a pilot reforestation projects in wetlands, achieving the required expertise to implement this project.

The proposed project is located in the degraded mangrove lands of the Sine Saloum and Casamance deltas, on the southeast Atlantic coast of Senegal. The mangrove degradation that began a few decades ago came about as a result of natural and anthropogenic causes, including:

 Climate change, with several marked periods of dryness in the 70s and the 80s, bringing changes in hydrologic flows of fresh and tide water in the coastal plains and riverbeds, in soil and water chemistry, acidity and salinity;  Deforestation for wood (cooking, charcoal, fish smoking, salt fabrication, construction, etc.), and rice cultivation, resulting in soil and hydrologic characteristics unfavourable for mangrove growing; and,  Road and other infrastructure building that inhibit the natural flow of sea and river water.

The project area is a degraded land without vegetation or with scattered mangrove trees in the intertidal zone (bare soils close to mature mangroves in steady state or degrading). The only current land use is related with the wetlands´ non forest products (fish, shellfish, oyster and crab).

Purpose of the proposed project activity

 To restore degraded wetlands and to improve productivity and environmental condition through reforestation, restoring ecological, economic and social services of a significant part of degraded Senegalese mangroves.  To mitigate Climate Change by the removal of GHG through biomass growth.  To reduce poverty of the local communities through employment creation in the short-term and the improvement of sustainable collection of mangrove products in the mid-term.

To attain these objectives, the proposed project will implement (see detailed information about the phases of the project in Annex 6):

 Plantations of Rizophora mangle for ecosystem restoration without harvesting objectives.  Awareness and technical assistance for local people in mangrove establishment, conservation and sustainable management.  Monitoring and management of project implementation until the end of the Project.

The proposed project will establish a total of 1,700 ha of plantations and remove 67,851 tCO2e during the first crediting period. The plantation will improve ecological conditions and mangrove productivity (fish, shellfish, oyster and crab); no thinning and harvesting activities are planned.

Contribution to sustainable development

The project activity will not only contribute to environmental protection, but also to socio-economic improvement in the rural area, including: capacity building for local people, creation of employment opportunity and increased mangrove productivity. Several activities will take place to improve the knowledge of the local communities in environment conservation, mangrove restoration and management. Short term employment will be generated for the management of the plantations during the implementation of the project, as well as during the monitoring phase. The mangrove restoration will improve mangrove production leading to a potential income increase for local people.

A.3. Project participants: >> Table A-1. Project participants Indicate if the Party Private and/or public entity(ies) Name of Party involved (*) involved wishes to be project participants (*) ((host) indicates a host Party) considered as a project (as applicable) participant (Yes/No) Senegal Oceanium No Group Danone France No Orbeo

A.4. Description of location and boundaries of the A/R CDM project activity:

A.4.1. Location of the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> A.4.1.1. Host Party(ies):

Senegal >> A.4.1.2. Region/State/Province:

Regions:

 Thiès, Fatick and Kaolack (Sine Saloum area)

 Ziguinchor and Kolda (Casamance area)

See details of the departments, districts and villages in the next table >> A.4.1.3. City/Town/Community (if applicable):

Table A-2. Location of the project activity Arrondissemen Area Zone Region Department Number Villages t (ha) Fimla 2,28 1 Fatick Fissel Mbabane 10,98 1 Djilor 1,53 1 Fatick Foundiougn Foundiougne 0,85 1 e Niodior 49,73 9 Sine Saloum Toubacouta 54,08 11 Nioro du Kaolack Wack Ngouna 22,99 Rip 8 Joal Fadiouth 43,22 2 Thies Mbour Sessene 7,50 1 Total 193,16 35 Bounkiling Bona 8,74 7 Goudomp Djibanar 44,12 14 Sedhiou Djende 12,41 1 Sedhiou Djibabouya 11,55 5 Djiredji 34,96 18 Diouloulou 18,95 3 Kadaba 1 388,29 33 Bignona Sindian 0,54 1 Casamance Tanghori 185,02 18 Tendouck 304,88 11 Ziguinchor Kabrousse 111,61 9 Oussouye Loudia Wolof 160,52 15 Nyassia 11,22 3 Niaguiss 88,91 14 Ziguinchor Nyassia 125,00 13 Total Casamance 1506,72 165 TOTAL 1699,88 200

Figure A-1. Political division1

A.4.2 Detailed geographic delineation of the project boundary, including information allowing the unique identification(s) of the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> The geographic coordinates of the boundaries of each of the parcels of land included in the proposed activity have been determined with a handheld Global Positioning System receiver (GPS) (GARMIN eTrex). Following GPS measurement of the project parcels, some adjustments (displacements) were made using Google Earth images to reduce potential GPS errors (Figure A-2). Coordinates in UTM- WGS84 of the centroid of the different parcels where A/R CDM project activity will take place are shown in Annex 5. The geographic coordinates of the boundaries of each of the parcels will be available for the Designated Operational Entity (DOE) in a GIS file (i.e. *.shp).

1 Institute de recherche pour le développement (IRD). 2000. SENEGAL 2000, images et cartes. M.-C. Cormier, C. Gueye, A. Lericollais et S.M. Seck. http://www.cartographie.ird.fr/SenegalFIG/

Digital Globe

GPS measurement -

Adjusted parcel Image : © Google Earth

Figure A-2. Example of the adjustment of parcel Djirnda S 5

An example of the geographic location of some parcels in Djirnda village is shown in the figure and table below. A complete set of maps and tables is available for the DOE on request (.shp files, images, etc).

Dakar Senegal

Kaolack

Digital Globe

Djirnda -

Moundé

Djirnda S 6 Image : © Google Earth

Digital Globe

Djirnda S 4 -

Djirnda S 5 Image : © Google Earth

Figure A-3. Example of location of three of Djirnda´s parcels

Table A-3. Locations for three of Djirnda´s parcels Centroid coordinates Arrondissement Area Perimeter Name UTM Department Region Village (district) (ha) (m) X Y Djirnda S 4 327259.9 1544919.15 Foundiougne Fatick Niodior Djirnda 4.73 2901 Djirnda S 5 326828.52 1545090.22 Foundiougne Fatick Niodior Djirnda 2.47 781 Djirnda S 6 327761.72 1545772.98 Foundiougne Fatick Niodior Djirnda 0.84 505

A.5. Technical description of the A/R CDM project activity:

A.5.1. Concise description of the present environmental conditions of the area planned for the proposed A/R CDM project activity, including:

A.5.1.1. Climate:

The north area of the project (Sine-Salom) is located in the Sudanese climate domain and the southern areas (Casamance) in the Sudanese-Guinean and sub-Guinean climate domains. In the former, annual precipitation ranges from 800-1,200 mm, while in the latter, it ranges from 400-800 mm. The dry season lasts from November to April, and the rainy season (due to monsoon resulting from the anticyclone of St. Helene) lasts from May to October. During the last century, Senegal suffered three important dry periods in 1910, 1940, and the most important one, after 1968. The latest period was the most severe, lasting from 1970 to 1990, and led to the displacement of the isohyets to around 120 km south.

The mean annual temperature of the project area is around 28ºC, with a mean minimum temperature of 20 to 21 ºC and a mean maximum temperature of 33 to 37 ºC. There is no occurrence of frost. 2 Figure A-4. Climate regions The project boundary is in the intertidal area and during the high tide it is supposed to be flooded, even in the dry season.

2 Institute de recherche pour le développement. 2000. SENEGAL 2000, images et cartes. M.-C. Cormier, C. Gueye, A. Lericollais et S.M. Seck. http://www.cartographie.ird.fr/SenegalFIG/

A.5.1.2. Hydrology: >> The project area is in the watersheds of Saloum and Casamance. Saloum

A.5.1.3. Soils:

>> Gambia The project activity is implemented on wetlands in different stages of degradation. The soils in Casamance the project area are characterized by Saline and Higromorphic (gley) soils. The types of soil depend on the degree of degradation. Low, Corubal degraded areas have muddy, silty, loamy soil

(with presence of peat and clay molle “poto 3 poto”), with a salinity rate below 44 ppm and an Figure A-5. Africa west coast basins acidity of between 4.5 and 6.5 pH. Highly degraded areas have compacted clay-sandyKonkoure soils with higher rates of acidity and salinity, and lower rates of organic components.

Scarcies A.5.1.4. Ecosystems: >>

Mangrove ecosystems in Sewa Saloum and Casamance Moa deltas

Mature mangroves in good Saint Paul condition: Presence of Rhizophora mangle and R. racemosa. Height around 6 m and DBH 10-15 cm. Density higher than 2500 trees/ha with a high density of lateral roots. Good natural regeneration rates. This type of mangrove 4 can only be found in major Figure A-6. Soils riverbanks with good soil condition.

“Dwarf” mangroves: Presence of Rhizophora mangle with a low regeneration rate. Height 2-4 m. Low growth rates due to bad soil conditions (salinity, acidity, etc.). This is the most common type of mangrove in Senegal.

Mature mangroves in critical condition: Dominance of Avicennia africana with scattered Rhizophora mangle trees 2 to 2.5 m height. Fragmented crown cover with presence of dry trees. Low or non-existent natural regeneration. This type of mangrove appears on compacted soils not always influenced by the tide, usually far from the sea (30-70 km) inside the “bolons5” or up in the river.

3 FAO. United Nations. 2000. Hydrological Basins of Africa. http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/metadata.show?currTab=simple&id=296 4 Office de la recherche scientifique et technique outré-mer. 1965. Carte Pédologique du Sénégal. 5 River branches. Highly degraded mature mangroves: Almost exclusive presence of Avicennia africana, with a high percentage of dead trees or in a bad state of health (few leaves, small trees, aborted flowers). The soil is hard, extremely acid or very sandy, and not influenced much by tides. Presence of saline efflorescences is characteristic (salinity rate > 60 ppt). The distance to the sea varies from 70 to 110 km.

“Tannes”: Bare areas with the presence of scattered and isolated trees. These are flooded during the spring tides and covered by saline efflorescences during the dry season. Natural regeneration is non- existent. Dead trees (Avicennia) and below ground roots (R. mangle) provide evidence of the presence of former vegetation.

A.5.2. Description of the presence, if any, of rare and endangered species and their habitats: >> A complete list of the potential species in the project area classified by their conservation status, national protection status and biological status is included in Annex 10.

A.5.3. Species and varieties selected for the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> The project area will only be reforested with Rhizophora mangle. Local name: “palétuvier rouge” (red mangrove). R. mangle is a native mangrove species that occurs naturally in surroundings of the project are. The species was selected taking into account both its characteristics and the ecological conditions of the area.

A.5.4. Technology to be employed by the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> During plantation, there will be neither clearing of pre-existing vegetation, nor soil preparation. All plantation activity will be performed manually.

Site selection:

Three criteria were taken into account for the selection of the planting plots:

 Soil conditions (texture, salinity and acidity): Favourable when soils are muddy, silty-loamy (with presence of peat and clay molle “poto poto”), with a salinity rate below 44 ppt and acidity with a pH between 4.5 and 6.5.  Degree and period of immersion: Favourable areas must be in the intertidal zone immerged at least four hours a day during the wet and dry seasons.  Ecological characteristics: Good ecological conditions will be demonstrated by a good state of health of the mature mangrove and dominance of the selected species in the nearby mature mangrove.

Training and awareness

Oceanium works on the sustainable management of natural resources. Its method of intervention is based on Social Communication and Participative management. To attain rigorous management of the resource by local populations, it is imperative that they be trained appropriately. The objective is to change the approach and behaviour of local populations towards the sustainable management of mangrove areas.

To reach this objective and gain optimum efficiency on the ground, it is indispensable to diversify the methods for training and raising awareness. Oceanium uses a set of social communication tools:

 Local awareness with cinema/meeting with an itinerant truck: Oceanium has a multimedia truck with audio-visual equipment adapted to the conditions or the region. The target reforestation community will be mobilized to participate in the event. In the cities, a media expert will incite people to attend the video projections. The objective of the cinema/meeting is to inform the local populations about the consequences of deforestation and sustainable management of natural resources (generally and with particular regard to mangroves). The idea is to make local populations conscious of the potential positive impact of the mangrove restoration and to motivate them personally.

A documentary film is projected followed by a PowerPoint presentation of information on the complex role of the mangrove in the ecosystem and its utility. The awareness phase starts two months before the reforestation and ends during the reforestation. About 189 villages and 42,745 people have participated in these awareness activities.

Table A-4. Summary of cinema meetings participation (See details in Annex 7) Year 2008 2009 Total Villages participating in 21 168 189 cinema/meetings Population 2,400 40,345 42,745

The cinema/meeting has the following phases:

o Organization: The screen is located in a main site of the village. People are mobilized with music and short videos about Oceanium, national environmental problems (deforestation, fires, overfishing, etc.), etc.

o Cinema projection: Once all the people have been mobilized, Oceanium projects a video about mangrove restoration. The video is translated by the facilitator into the local language (Wolof, Diola, Peul, Mangingue, etc.). All the details of the video are explained during its projection.

o Training: A PowerPoint file is projected with the technical guide explaining the reforestation process. All the information is translated into the different local languages.

o Meeting: During the last phase, the village leader encourages the local people to participate in the reforestation; after that, participants offer comments and ask questions.

Strengths of the method:

o Simplified mobilization of the community: The truck arrives at the village and facilitates the mobilization of all villagers to attend the projection. All of the community members participate together (men, women, children, old men, etc.), and therefore everybody is represented during the meeting after the projection.

o Attraction of attention: Because the video has been filmed in the zones where the film is projected, the spectators recognize the actors and local areas, and this contributes to their interest in the film.

o Awareness potential: The strength of the images makes the villagers integrate the film as a proof of their reality.

 Training:

o Local people: People involved in the reforestation are trained during the cinema/meeting, and also during the reforestation periods, guides are provided to the reforestation manager. People are trained about the mangrove ecosystem, propagule collection and plantation. Oceanium’s team is in charge of the logistics and supervises reforestation.

o Oceanium team: Local area managers are trained in GPS use. Theoretical and practical sessions are conducted in the Casamance and Sine Saloum headquarters. Persons responsible for the projections are trained in the use of the electronic devices necessary for the video and slide (power point) projections.

 Project promotion:

o Radio: Radio is an important information source for the local people. Oceanium uses it to mobilize and sensitize people. National radio programs are also used for the project promotion at a national level (Walf FM, Sud FM, RFM and Radio Nostalgie). Influential Senegalese (politicians, village leaders, etc.) are invited to discuss the project during the radio programs. Several themes are approached in the awareness campaign for the mangrove, the follow-up of the project, why to reforest, etc.

Table A-5. Radio programs Radio Number of programme Frequency Zig FM 9 1/week Sud FM 9 1/week Walf Fadjiri 9 1/week FM Awagna 18 2/week Kabisseu FM 5 Total 50

o Press: Several journalists visit the project and articles are published in international press (Le Monde, National Geographic, La Croix, L’Express, La Tribune, Le Figaro and Terra Eco). Several press conferences are held during different phases of the project. A representative of the tourism guide “Lonely Planet” has visited the project during part of the reforestation activities. Press agencies have followed the project (Agence France Presse, Agence de Presse Sénégalaise, Agence de Presse Africaine and IRI9 news - Agence de presse humanitaire des Nations Unies-). Several environmental journals have published articles about the importance of reforestation: VIE (Vert, Info, Environnement) and ACACIA (lettre des amis de l'agriculture durable en Afrique).

o Internet: In the Oceanium´s web page (www.oceanium.org) there is a lot of information about the NGO and the project. A blog has also been posted on the web with specific information about the advances of the projects. Partners of the project also include information about the mangrove restoration project in their web pages (www.ausenegal.com, www.senegalaisement.com, www.france24.com, www.tv5.org, www.afriklive.com, www.orange.fr, www.lespiedssurterre.danone.com, www.longitude181.com, www.ecolopop.info, www.patrickwallet.com , www.hellio-vaningen.fr, etc.).

o Others: other ways of project promotion are listed in the following table.

Table A-6. Other project promotion means Mean Number in 2008 Number in 2009 T-Shirt 1,700 2,000 Posters 5,000 5,000 Water bottle No information 1 000 000 Mean Number in 2008 Number in 2009 Small stickers No information No information Big stickers - No information Flyers No information - Truck 1 3

Seedlings preparation:

No seedling preparation is necessary, as propagules will be collected directly from the mature mangrove (that have already fallen or directly from the tree). When available, propagules will be collected near the plantation sites and transported by the planting team. If there are no propagules in the area, then they will be collected and transported in sacks with vehicles (trucks, boats, etc.) from other regions with similar ecological conditions.

Propagules should preferably be planted the same day they are collected. When this is not possible, they will be stored in closed sacs, inside the water and in a shady place for a maximum of one day.

Plantation:

Good propagules will be selected, discarding those in bad conditions (broken, dry, etc), and then planted manually in a straight position, perpendicular to the ground. Around 1/3 of the propagules will be buried in the ground. Propagules will be planted in and within rows 1 meter apart (frame 1x1m). Therefore, planting density will be about 10,000 trees/ha.

The entire project area will be planted during two campaigns (2008 and 2009).

Table A-7. Planting plan A/R Area (ha) Year Sine Saloum Casamance Total Total Total GEC REC Total GEC REC Total GEC REC 2008 143,39 5,79 149,18 143,39 5,79 149,18 2009 128,03 65,13 193,16 875,87 481,67 1357,53 1003,90 546,80 1550,69 Total 128,03 65,13 193,16 1019,26 487,46 1506,72 1147,29 552,59 1699,88 GEC: Good ecological conditions; REC: Regular ecological conditions

Collected propagules Local people planting in rows

A.5.5. Transfer of technology/know-how, if applicable: >> Since the implementation of the project depends largely on local people, capacity building and transfer of technology is extremely important. Training for local people is focused on such technical issues as planting techniques, management techniques, and conservation protection measures. Capacity building will be developed in different ways as shown in Section A.5.4., paragraph “Training and awareness”.

In this project knowledge transfer is not a one way approach made by Oceanium to local people, but there will be open discussions, in which villagers´ comments will be used to improve project success. More detailed information on technology transfer and capacity building is available to DOE on request.

A.6. Description of legal title to the land, current land tenure and rights to tCERs / lCERs issued for the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> Matthieu Wemaëre, lawyer in the court of Paris and Brussels, performed a due diligence of the legal framework of the project in February 2010, with a report dated February 22, 2010. The scope of the work was purely dedicated to assessment of the legal title of the lands to be reforested, current land tenure and land use rights with an interest in clarifying the possible beneficiaries of the tCERs to be generated under project activities.

Hereafter are presented the major findings of the study:

The project is implemented in the national domain (by referring to the article 1 of the Senegalese law 64- 46 regarding the “Domaine National”, dated June 17, 1964) and/or in the public natural domain (article 5 of the Senegales law 76-66, dated July 2, 1976 – Code du Domaine de l’Etat). This specific status of the lands does not allow anyone to benefit from any carbon credits to be generated under the project, even if one (local communities, etc.) can benefit from some rights as derived from the custom law. The law 96/07 dealing with the transfer of responsibilities to local communities highlights nevertheless in its article 20 that “Communuautés Rurales “ have to authorise any project in the public or maritime domain. In this context, the Senegalese Climate Change Committee, in its meeting purely dedicated to the review of the Oceanium mangrove restoration project and dated May 12, 2010, clearly asked the Orbeo representative (Laurent Valiergue), who presented the Project Design Document, for getting such an approval from any “Communauté Rurale” benefiting from (and/or impacted by) project activities. Based on that, Oceanium entered into specific discussions with each “Communauté Rurale” with an interest in obtaining such a green light. An agreement duly signed by both parties specifies the undertakings of each party while securing the transfer of the Emission Reductions to Oceanium.

Finally, the study confirms the validity (vis-à-vis local regulations) of the legal framework set up between the parties involved in the implementation of project activities, such as: - the NGO, Oceanium, - local communities in the field, and - the Group Danone, with different levels of contractual arrangements: - a first agreement between the Group Danone and Oceanium stipulating that only Danone might claim the benefit of the removals to be stored on the ground, and - written documents duly signed by the communities participating in the planting stage, in line with the contract between Oceanium and Danone.

A.7. Assessment of the eligibility of the land: >> Land eligibility is assessed using “The procedure to demonstrate the eligibility of lands for afforestation and reforestation for CDM project activities” approved by the CDM Executive Board (EB 35, Annex 18) (for further details of the eligibility assessment see Annex 10).

The national forest definition as communicated by Senegal’s Designated National Authority (DNA) to the UNFCCC is summarized as follows:

(i) Minimum tree cover of 30% (ii) Minimum land area of 0.50 ha (iii) Minimum tree height of 2.0 m

The land at the beginning of the project does not contain forest:

 Vegetation on project lands is below Senegal forest thresholds: Field surveys conducted in 2009 during the project boundary measurements indicated that the proposed project area is below the threshold for the definition of a forest. The project is implemented on degraded lands without vegetation or with scattered trees. It was confirmed using the Google Earth images from 2003, 2004, 2005, 2008 and 2009 that the proposed project area did not contain any forest.

Table A-8. Used information for the eligibility assessment Year Source Comments 2009 Field forms Used to demonstrate that areas are currently without forest 2003, 2004, 2005, Google Earth 2008 and 2009 satellite images 1989 Aerial Photographs Used to demonstrate land was not forest in from JICA6 Sine Saloum. Photographs scale: 1/40,000. obtained in the Date: March 1989. DTGC7 1988 and 1989 Spot satellite Used to demonstrate land was not forest in

6 Japan International Cooperation Agency 7 Direction des travaux géographiques et cartographiques. Senegal images. Provided by Casamance. Planet Action.

 All young natural stands and all plantations on the land are not expected to reach the minimum crown cover and minimum height chosen by the host country to define forest; some isolated seedlings can be found in some plantation plots but current conditions will not allow the scattered regeneration to reach the forest definition.  The land is not temporarily unstocked: Lands were degraded more than 20 years ago as demonstrated in the following paragraphs.

The land was not forest as of 31 December 1989:

Aerial photographs taken in 1989 were analysed in order to demonstrate the eligibility of lands in the Sine Saloum region. In the case of Casamance, satellite images from 1988 and 1989 were used.

Results of the eligibility assessment:

Table A-9. Eligible project lands Eligible areas (ha) Sine Saloum Casamance Total Total Total GEC REC Total GEC REC Total GEC REC 128,03 65,13 193,16 1019,26 487,46 1506,72 1147,29 552,59 1699,88 GEC: Good ecological conditions; REC: Regular ecological conditions

In the following figures, an example is presented that describes how the eligibility assessment was performed in the Sine Saloum region using the available images. Detailed information of the assessment of each of the project plots is available to DOE.

Digital Globe

- Image : © Google Earth

Figure A-7. Example of forest (red) and non-forest (green) areas in 1989 (using the 1989 aerial photograph)

Digital Globe

- Image : © Google Earth

Figure A-8. Example of forest (red) and non-forest (green) areas in 2004 (using the Google Earth images)

Digital Globe

- Image : © Google Earth

Figure A-9. Example eligible project areas

A.8. Approach for addressing non-permanence: >> The project has selected the issuance of tCERs.

A.9. Estimated amount of net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks over the chosen crediting period: >> The net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks as a result of the proposed A/R CDM project activity is anticipated to be around 67,850.90 tons of CO2 equivalent during the crediting period (between 2008 and 2037) as shown in the following table:

Table A-10. Ex-ante estimation of annual net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks

Summary of results obtained in Sections C.7., D.1., and D.2. Estimation of Estimation of Estimation of net Estimation of baseline net Estimation of net anthropogenic actual net GHG GHG leakage anthropogenic GHG removals Year removals by removals by (tonnes of GHG removals by sinks (tons of sinks (tonnes of sinks (tonnes CO2 e) by sinks (tonnes CO2 e) CO2 e) of CO2 e) of CO2 e) Cumulative 2008 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 2009 0.00 0.5 0.00 0.5 0.5 2010 0.00 6.7 0.00 6.7 7.2 2011 0.00 31.9 0.00 31.9 39.1 2012 0.00 77.3 0.00 77.3 116.3 2013 0.00 187.2 0.00 187.2 303.6 2014 0.00 308.7 0.00 308.7 612.3 2015 0.00 543.3 0.00 543.3 1155.6 2016 0.00 998.0 0.00 998.0 2153.6 2017 0.00 1448.6 0.00 1448.6 3602.2 2018 0.00 1935.7 0.00 1935.7 5537.9 2019 0.00 2422.8 0.00 2422.8 7960.7 2020 0.00 2877.2 0.00 2877.2 10837.9 2021 0.00 3273.6 0.00 3273.6 14111.5 2022 0.00 3595.0 0.00 3595.0 17706.5 2023 0.00 3833.2 0.00 3833.2 21539.7 2024 0.00 3986.9 0.00 3986.9 25526.6 2025 0.00 4060.6 0.00 4060.6 29587.2 2026 0.00 4062.2 0.00 4062.2 33649.4 2027 0.00 4002.0 0.00 4002.0 37651.4 2028 0.00 3890.9 0.00 3890.9 41542.3 2029 0.00 3740.1 0.00 3740.1 45282.4 2030 0.00 3559.7 0.00 3559.7 48842.1 2031 0.00 3359.2 0.00 3359.2 52201.2 2032 0.00 3146.3 0.00 3146.3 55347.5 2033 0.00 2927.7 0.00 2927.7 58275.2 2034 0.00 2708.8 0.00 2708.8 60984.1 2035 0.00 2493.8 0.00 2493.8 63477.9 2036 0.00 2285.8 0.00 2285.8 65763.8 2037 0.00 2087.1 0.00 2087.1 67850.9 Total 0.00 67850.9 0.00 67850.9 (t CO2-e)

Figure A-10. Ex-ante estimation of net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks tCERs and lCERs

80.000

70.000

tCERs

60.000

50.000 lCERs (with reversal)

40.000

lCERs 30.000 (without reversal)

20.000 Net anthropogenic greenhouse

tCO2e (net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks) GHG anthropogenic (net tCO2e gas removals by sinks 10.000

- 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29

Project year (t)

Verifications will be triggered every five years.

A.10. Public funding of the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> No public funding used for the proposed project activities will result in the diversion of official development assistance (ODA) or financial obligations of any Parties under UNFCCC.

The project development, reforestation activities, and the validation will be financed by a French private company (The Danone Group).

SECTION B. Duration of the project activity / crediting period

B.1 Starting date of the proposed A/R CDM project activity and of the crediting period: >> The project activity started on 25/02/2008

B. 2. Expected operational lifetime of the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> 30 years.

B.3 Choice of crediting period:

B.3.1. Length of the renewable crediting period (in years and months), if selected: >> N/A

B.3.2. Length of the fixed crediting period (in years and months), if selected: >> 30 years

SECTION C. Application of an approved baseline and monitoring methodology

C.1. Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> Proposed new baseline and monitoring methodology: Afforestation and reforestation of degraded tidal forest habitats

This methodology is based on elements from the following methodologies:

 AR-ACM0001 “Afforestation and reforestation of degraded land” (Version 05);  AR-ACM0002 “Afforestation or reforestation of degraded land without displacement of pre- project activities” (Version 01);  AR-AM0004 “Reforestation or afforestation of land currently under agricultural use” (Version 04)  AR-AM0006 “Afforestation/Reforestation with Trees Supported by Shrubs on Degraded Land” Version 03)  AR-AMS0003 “Simplified baseline and monitoring methodology for CDM afforestation and reforestation project activities implemented on wetlands” (Version 01).

This methodology also refers to the latest approved versions of the following tools, procedures, guidelines and guidance:

 Combined tool to identify the baseline scenario and demonstrate the additionality in A/R CDM project activities;  Tool for estimation of emissions from clearing, burning and decay of existing vegetation due to implementation of an A/R CDM project activity;  Calculation of the number of sample plots for measurements within A/R CDM project activities;  Tool for testing the significance of GHG emissions in A/R CDM project activities;  Estimation of the increase in GHG emissions attributable to displacement of pre-project agricultural activities in A/R CDM project activity.  Procedures to demonstrate the eligibility of lands for afforestation and reforestation CDM project activities.  Guidance on application of the definition of the project boundary to A/R CDM project activities.  Procedure to determine when accounting of the soil organic carbon pool may be conservatively neglected in A/R CDM project activities.  Guidelines on conditions under which increase in GHG emissions attributable to displacement of pre-project crop cultivation activities in A/R CDM project activity is insignificant.  Guidelines on conditions under which increase in GHG emissions related to displacement of pre- project grazing activities in A/R CDM project activity is insignificant.

C.2. Assessment of the applicability of the selected approved methodology to the proposed A/R CDM project activity and justification of the choice of the methodology: >> The proposed A/R CDM project activity complies with the conditions of the chosen methodology in the following ways:

 The project is an Afforestation or Reforestation of degraded tidal forest habitats, which are subject to further degradation or remain in a low carbon steady state, through propagule planting, enhancing tree biomass and SOC. The project activity does not lead to a shift of pre-project activities outside the project boundary.  The project activities are to be implemented in degraded wetlands and they conform to the stipulations of the national policies and legislation applicable to wetlands (see DNA statement in Annex 8). In addition, Senegal is a Party to the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat (the Ramsar Convention, Iran 1971), entered into force on November 11th, 1977 (with 4 sites and 99,720 ha); and the project activities fall within the provisions of the Convention (see DNA statement in Annex 8). Part of the project area is inside one Ramsar site: Delta du Saloum, designated 4 March 1984 and covering an area of 73,000 ha.  There is no herbaceous vegetation in the project area.  The project activity consists in reforestation through propagule planting on degraded wetlands. Lands are degraded as a result of deforestation prior to 1990 as demonstrated in Section A.7 and are bare lands with scattered or inexistent trees. Following Annex A of AR-AMS0003 (version 1) “Procedure for demonstration of wetlands that are degraded and degrading with respect to vegetation cover” the project area is degraded with respect to vegetation cover and is likely to continue to degrade in the absence of project activity. Several studies confirm that the mangroves in the project area were deforested during the last decades (available to DOE on request). Total mangrove area in Senegal in 1980 was 1,690 km2 and in 2006 1,287 km2 (8). Since the 1970s and 1980s some of the mangrove forest has perished. The disappearance of mangrove is related to a modification of physical-chemical conditions of the river water and ground-water (increased salinity and acidity) because of the decline in rainfall in recent decades9 and due to anthropogenic alteration of the hydrology (i.e. dam construction for rice growing). SOC is also is declining or in a low carbon steady-state due to vegetation and soil degradation. On the other hand, in some areas, dependence of communities on mangrove resources is leading to unsustainable use and overexploitation of fish, molluscs and timber (i.e. construction and fuelwood).  Environmental conditions and human-caused degradation do not permit the encroachment of natural forest vegetation (see Section A-7)  The fine litter (woody twigs less than 2mm diameter, bark and leaves) will not be removed from the site in the A/R CDM project activity. Even though it will be displaced by natural causes (wind, tides, etc).  N-fertilisers will not be used in the project.  Project activities will not lead to any changes in hydrology of land subjected to reforestation. The only project activity/measure is propagule planting. Therefore, there will be no flooding, digging, drainage, ditch blocking or any other direct activity involving the alteration of the hydrology. The project activity is implemented on degraded intertidal wetlands on deforested mangroves.  In the pre-project situation, the lands were degraded wetlands without agricultural activities; therefore there is not displacement of agricultural activities attributable to the A/R CDM project activity.  Project lands are not drained lands. The project area will not be affected by drainage activities that occur outside the project area attributable to the project activity.  Aqua farming activities do no occur in the project area. Even thought, if they occur they will not be displaced due to the project activity.  There will not be any site preparation in this reforestation project activity; propagules will be directly planted by local people and hole-digging will not be necessary.

8 UNEP. 2007. Mangroves of Western and Central Africa. UNEP_WCMC 9 Tappan, G.G. et al. 2004. Ecoregions and land cover trends in Senegal. Journal of Arid Environments.  As explained in the previous paragraph, less than 10% of the total surface project area will be disturbed.

C.3. Description of strata identified using the ex-ante stratification: >> The project’s baseline ecological condition is degraded wetlands without vegetation or with scattered mangrove trees. All the project area will be planted in two years using the same species (Rhizophora mangle), even though during the baseline study, some differences in the ecological conditions of the project area have been observed. In order to improve accuracy and precision of ex ante estimations, the project area has been stratified to take into account those differences that may affect plantation growth.

During the project identification four strata were studied; however, areas with low growing potential and bad ecological conditions were discarded because of the high probability of failure. Only the two following strata were considered in the project:

 Stratum 1 (good ecological conditions) qualified areas for the growth of Rhizophora:

o Soil conditions: Moderate salinity rates (< 34 ppt). Muddy soils. o Degree and period of immersion: In the intertidal zone, immerged at least four hours per day during both the wet and dry seasons. o Ecological characteristics: A good state of health of the mature mangrove near the project area and dominance of Rhizophora.

 Stratum 2 (regular ecological conditions) acceptable areas for the growth of Rhizophora:

o Soil conditions: Higher salinity rates (35-40 ppt). Clay-sandy compacted soils. pH <5,5. o Degree and period of immersion: In the intertidal zone, immerged during both the wet and dry seasons. o Ecological characteristics: Rhizophora and Avicenia species appear with similar densities in the mature forest near the project area with a height around 2 m.

Taking into account the two planting years, the project will have 4 substrata (2008-stratum 1; 2008- stratum-2; 2009-stratum 1; and 2009-stratum 2).

C.4. Identification of the baseline scenario (if the “Combined Tool to identify the baseline scenario and demonstrate additionality in A/R CDM project activities” is applied proceed to paragraph C.6): >>N/A C.4.1. Description of the application of the approach to identify the most plausible baseline scenario (separately for each stratum): >> N/A C.4.2. Description of the identified baseline scenario (separately for each stratum): >> N/A

C.5. Assessment and demonstration of additionality (if the “Combined tool to identify the baseline scenario and demonstrate additionality in A/R CDM project activities” is not used): >> N/A

C.6. Identification of the baseline scenario and demonstration of additionality using the “Combined tool to identify the baseline scenario and demonstrate additionality in A/R CDM project activities” (if required by the selected approved methodology): >> Step 0: Preliminary screening based on the starting date of the A/R project activity

 The staring date of the project is 25/02/2008 with the first activities; therefore the starting date of the A/R CDM project activity was after 31 December 1999.

 Previous to the starting date of the project activity the Danone Group and Oceanium signed an agreement in which there is evidence to demonstrate that the incentive from the planned use of CERs was seriously considered in the decision to proceed with the project activity. Continuing and real actions were taken to secure CDM status for the project in parallel with its implementation.

Step 1: Identification of alternative land use scenarios to the proposed A/R CDM project activity

Sub-step 1a: Identify credible alternative land use scenarios to the proposed CDM project activity

The alternatives applicable to the project context are:

1. Status Quo: Continuation of the pre-project land use. The land will remain as a degraded wetland.

2. Forestation of the land within the project boundary performed without being registered as the A/R CDM project activity

Sub-step 1b: Consistency of credible land use scenarios with enforced mandatory applicable laws and regulations

The alternatives listed above are in compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

Step 2: Barrier analysis

Sub-step 2a: Identification of barriers that would prevent the implementation of at least one alternative land use scenarios a) Investment barriers, other than economic/financial barriers

The project is implemented on degraded lands with two main objectives: mangrove ecosystem restoration and social awareness for environment conservation. No direct incomes are expected from the forest, and no thinning and harvesting activities are expected; therefore, no timber production is projected. Even so, the local communities will benefit indirectly by the restored mangrove because of its increased productivity (fish, oyster and shellfish production).

There is neither credit nor credit funding for non-profitable activities. The reforestation is possible because of the CDM benefits that the project provides to The Danone Group. The project is developed by a partnership between the investor (Danone), an international NGO providing technical and scientific support (IUCN) and a local NGO providing field expertise (Oceanium). Reforestation is implemented by Oceanium and local communities. The local NGO has demonstrated capacity in environment conservation awareness and in mobilizing local people but needs funding to finance such activities. Local communities do not have the capacity for implementing the project without the support of Oceanium.

Previous to the proposed project activity, smaller projects were implemented in the area, but even in those cases where the establishment phase was financed, the management of plantations failed in later years due to financing and capacity deficits. The proposed project will cover the financing and support needed during the entire project period, guaranteeing the appropriate implementation and long-term management of the mangroves. The proposed project is significantly different in its design as it is based on a commitment for the long term while dealing with a large project boundary. We can say that the project is a first of its kind, given its specifics. b) Technological barriers

Due to a lack of technology, most of previously implemented projects have failed. Thanks to the technical and scientific support of IUCN, available due to Danone financing and CDM credits, the project is possible. IUCN has performed a detailed study of the ecological conditions of the area and the requirements of the selected species, and is providing the necessary guidelines on how and where to reforest (i.e. site selection, planting density, propagule collection). The contribution of the technical assistance for mangrove restoration is necessary for the project’s success. On the other hand, as mentioned in the previous paragraphs, without the infrastructure provided by Oceanium (which depends on funds from CDM credits), local communities would not be able to develop a reforestation project on a significant scale. c) Barriers due to prevailing practice:

The small-scale CDM AR project activity is the “first of its kind”. No project activity of this type is currently operational in West Africa.

Although there are other reforestation projects, this project activity is the first one in Senegal to be undertaken with the direct involvement of a local NGO, local communities and international experts in mangrove restoration. It aims to be the first A/R CDM registered project in Senegal and the first registered project worldwide using the selected methodology. The size of the project makes it also a first of its kind (1,700 ha). Previous reforestation projects were implemented in Senegal in degraded mangroves but on smaller scales.

d) Barriers due to social conditions

Local communities are committed to plant mangrove, but without the carbon component they do not have adequate access to technical and organizational assistance. Villagers need the support of IUCN and Oceanium to implement and maintain the project. Plantation projects launched elsewhere in the past were not successful due to similar insufficiencies.

Sub-step 2b. Elimination of land use scenarios that are prevented by the identified barriers

There are two possible future baseline scenarios:

1. Status Quo: Continuation of the land as a degraded wetland 2. Implementation of the project activity not undertaken as a CDM project activity;

Scenario 1 does not face any of the barriers described above, and can be assumed to be the baseline scenario.

Scenario 2 faces all the aforementioned barriers, and would not be implemented unless otherwise it is undertaken as CDM project activity.

The actual net GHG removals by sinks will be increased above those that would have occurred in the absence of the project activity, because Scenario 1 is the most plausible scenario and it is different from the project activity.

Sub-step 2c. Determination of baseline scenario

The baseline scenario is de Status Quo

Step 4: Common practice analysis

The project activity is the first of its kind in the host country. There are no similar forestation activities in the geographic area of the proposed A/R CDM project activity. Several other forestation projects have been developed in wetlands in the country at a very small scale.

With step 4 being met, the proposed A/R CDM project activity is not the baseline scenario, and is therefore additional.

C.7. Estimation of the ex-ante baseline net GHG removals by sinks:

Following the methodology, the above ground biomass and the below ground biomass of trees are the only pools to be considered. There are not trees in the baseline or their presence is insignificant, therefore the baseline net GHG removals by sinks is 0 and also the carbon stock in living trees at the start of the project activity.

Please present final results of your calculations using the following tabular format. Year Annual estimation of baseline net GHG removals by sinks; t CO2-e 2008 0.00 2009 0.00 2010 0.00 2011 0.00 2012 0.00 2013 0.00 2014 0.00 2015 0.00 2016 0.00 2017 0.00 2018 0.00 2019 0.00 2020 0.00 2021 0.00 2022 0.00 2023 0.00 2024 0.00 2025 0.00 2026 0.00 2027 0.00 2028 0.00 2029 0.00 2030 0.00 2031 0.00 2032 0.00 2033 0.00 2034 0.00 2035 0.00 2036 0.00 2037 0.00 Total estimated baseline net GHG removals 0.00 by sinks; t CO2-e Total number of crediting years 30 Annual average over the crediting period of 0.00 estimated baseline net GHG removals by sinks; t CO2-e

SECTION D. Estimation of ex ante actual net GHG removals by sinks, leakage, and estimated amount of net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks over the chosen crediting period

D.1. Ex-ante estimation of actual net GHG removals by sinks: >> Increase in emissions:

The GHG that are expected to be emitted due to the project activity are CO2 emissions associated with fossil fuel consumption from transportation of the labour force and propagules to the project site. Taking into account the EB decisions on its 42 and 44 meetings, emissions are assumed to be negligible and accounted as zero.

Sum of verifiable changes in carbon stocks:

Deadwood, Litter and Soil Organic Carbon pools will not be considered because transparent and verifiable information can be provided that carbon stocks in each of the mentioned pools in the baseline scenario can be expected to decrease more or increase less, relative to the with-project scenario. This information is available on request for the DOE.

The ex-ante actual net GHG removals by sinks are calculated using equation 9 of the methodology as the sum of the changes in living biomass carbon stocks (above and belowground) minus the increase in non- CO2 GHG emissions. As abovementioned, the sum of the increases in GHG emissions by sources within the project boundary as a result of the implementation of the A/R CDM Project activity is assumed to be negligible:

ΔCACTUAL = ΔCP - GHGE = ΔCP (Equation 1)

Where:

ΔCACTUAL = actual net greenhouse gas removals by sinks at time t; t CO2-e ΔCP = sum of the changes of the carbon stock in the selected carbon pools (aboveground and below ground tree biomass) within the project boundary; t CO2-e GHGE = 0 = increase in non-CO GHG emissions within the project boundary as a result of the implementation of the A/R CDM project activity; t CO2-e

ΔCPt is calculated using equations 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 and 16 of the methodology.

Only one species is being planted in two different baseline strata, thus only two CTREE,j,p,i (of equation 15) will be calculated, one for stratum 1 (CTREE,R.mangle,stratum1) and other for stratum 2 (CTREE,R.mangle,stratum2), both for R. mangle. To calculate the aboveground biomass of red mangrove (f(X,Y…) of equation 15) the following steps have been followed:

Step 1: Selection of the allometric equation.

The equation of Smith and Whelan (2009)10 for R. mangle, presented in appendix D of AR-AMS0003 ver. 1, has been used. The choice of this equation is a conservative approach as the authors indicate: “equations give the lowest estimate of biomass for all three species when compared to results from other studies”. While the equation was created for South Florida mangroves, it is considered accurate for the project because the allometric equation for mangrove species is considered to be highly species-specific, but less site-specific (Komiyama et al. 2008) 11.

Species DBH limits Equation R2 Rhizophora mangle (L.) 0.5-20.0 cm Log10 AGB = 1.731 log10 (DBH) – 0.112 0.94

Step 2: Identification of the maximum AGB.

Komiyama et al. (2008) took into account the ecological conditions of the project area (basically the height of the mature forest near the project area) to estimate the maximum potential AGB. In R. mangle forests with a tree height from 4 m to 7.5 m (height similar to the mature mangrove in Sine Saloum and Casamance) the AGB used for the Komiyama study was between 56 and 63 t d.m.ha-1.

Step 3: Creation of a diameter growth model.

A diameter growth model has been created based on the Chapman-Richards function (Richards, 1959, Pienaar and Turnbull, 1973). To generate the function, three values have been considered:

 The maximum diameter calculated with the Smith and Whelan equation with the maximum AGB of 60 t dm ha-1 (8.3 cm);  Two field data: 6 cm at age 22 and 2 cm at age 11 (from field report).

10 Smith, T.J. and Whelan, K.R.T. 2006. Development of allometric relations for three species in South Florida for use in the Greater Everglades ecosystem restoration. Wetlands Ecology and Management 14:409-419. 11 Komiyama, A., Eong Ong, J. and Sastorn, P. 2008. Allometry, biomass, and productivity of mangrove forests: A review. Aquatic Botany 89: 128–137.

Table D-1. DBH model Age (yr) DBH (cm) Equation: DBH=8.3*(1-e(-0.12*Age))4,5 1 0.0 8 2 0.0 3 0.0 4 0.1 7 5 0.2 6 0.4 6 7 0.7 8 0.9 5 9 1.3 10 1.7 4

11 2.0 DBH (cm)DBH 12 2.5 3 13 2.9 14 3.3 15 3.7 2 16 4.1 17 4.4 1 18 4.8 19 5.1 0 20 5.4 0 5 10 Age (yr)15 20 25 30 21 5.7 22 5.9 23 6.2 24 6.4 25 6.6 26 6.8 27 6.9 28 7.1 29 7.2 30 7.3

Step 4: Creation of an AGB growth model a) Tree density

Although the planting density is 10000 trees/ha, it is assumed that the final density will be around 600. This is a conservative assumption taking into account other published accounts of Rhizophora plantation (256012 tree/ha and 356713 tree/ha). An estimated mortality has been considered for the 6 first years (see table below).

12 Soares, M.L.G. and Schaeffer-Novelli, Y. 2005. Above-ground biomass of mangrove species. I. Analysis of models Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 65: 1-18 13 Tamooh, F., Karachi, M., Huxham, M., Mencuccini, M., Kairo, J.G. and Kirui, B. 2008. Below-ground root yield and distribution in natural and replanted mangrove forests at Gazi bay, Kenya. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 1290-1297 b) Growth model

With the allometric equation, the diameter growth model and the density, the total AGB per hectare is calculated in the following table.

Table D-2. AGB growth model

DBH ABG (kg Density ABG (t Age (year) Mortality (%) (cm) d.m.) (trees/ha) d.m./ha)

1 0.0 0.00 10000 50% 0.00 2 0.0 0.00 5000 50% 0.00 3 0.0 0.00 2500 50% 0.01 4 0.1 0.02 1250 25% 0.02 5 0.2 0.06 938 25% 0.06 6 0.4 0.17 704 15% 0.12 7 0.7 0.37 600 0% 0.22 8 0.9 0.70 600 0% 0.42 9 1.3 1.19 600 0% 0.71 10 1.7 1.85 600 0% 1.11 11 2.0 2.68 600 0% 1.61 12 2.5 3.67 600 0% 2.20 13 2.9 4.80 600 0% 2.88 14 3.3 6.04 600 0% 3.63 15 3.7 7.37 600 0% 4.42 16 4.1 8.76 600 0% 5.26 17 4.4 10.18 600 0% 6.11 18 4.8 11.60 600 0% 6.96 19 5.1 13.00 600 0% 7.80 20 5.4 14.36 600 0% 8.62 21 5.7 15.67 600 0% 9.40 22 5.9 16.92 600 0% 10.15 23 6.2 18.10 600 0% 10.86 24 6.4 19.21 600 0% 11.52 25 6.6 20.24 600 0% 12.14 26 6.8 21.19 600 0% 12.71 27 6.9 22.07 600 0% 13.24 28 7.1 22.87 600 0% 13.72 29 7.2 23.61 600 0% 14.17 30 7.3 24.28 600 0% 14.57

Once the aboveground biomass has been calculated (f(X,Y…) of equation 15) then CTREE,R.mangle,stratum1 and CTREE,R.mangle,stratum2 are calculated using the parameter of the following table:

Table D-3. Values and data source of the parameters of equations 14 and 15 of the selected methodology Parameter Unit Species Value Data source Carbon Fraction (CF) t C/t d.m. R. mangle 0.5 Default value from AR-AMS0003 v.1 Root to shoot (R) t d.m./t d.m. R. mangle 0.83 IPCC 200314. Table 3A.1.8. Value15 for Tidal marsh Vegetation Type

The main differences between the two strata are the ecological conditions which directly affect biomass growth. The growth model described in table D-2 represents stratum 1, where the ecological conditions are favourable. As a conservative assumption the growth model for stratum 2 has been calculated as half of the stratum 1 model. Worse ecological conditions will lead to lower growth rates and lower survival but there is not specific ex ante information for these two issues.

14 IPCC 2003. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. Eds J. Penman, M.. Gytarsky, T. Hiraishi, T. Krug, D. Kruger, R. Pipatti, L. Buendía, K. Miwa, T. Ngara, K. Tanabe and F. Wagner. IGES, Hayama, JP. 595p. 15 The value was calculated as one standard deviation below mean value, following “The guidelines on conservative choice and application of default data in estimation of the net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks” CDM EB 50 report, annex 23.

Results of actual net greenhouse gas removals by sinks

The actual net GHG removals by sink are calculated with the tool TARASM16 (see Table D-4) which considers all the equations of the selected methodology. For this calculation, the tool uses the planting plan (see section A.5.4), the AGB growth models and the parameters of Table D-3.

Table D-4. Ex-ante actual net GHG removals by sinks Stratum 1 Stratum 2 Total above and below ground biomass carbon Project above-ground biomass below-ground above-ground biomass below-ground pools year carbon pool biomass carbon pool carbon pool biomass carbon pool annual cumulative annual cumulative annual cumulative annual cumulative annual cumulative tCO e yr- tCO e yr- tCO e yr- tCO e yr- tCO e yr- year 2 tCO e 2 tCO e 2 tCO e 2 tCO e 2 tCO e 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2008 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2009 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 2010 3.2 3.4 2.6 2.8 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 6.7 7.2 2011 14.4 17.9 12.0 14.8 3.0 3.5 2.5 2.9 31.9 39.1 2012 35.1 53.0 29.1 44.0 7.1 10.6 5.9 8.8 77.3 116.3 2013 83.5 136.5 69.3 113.3 18.8 29.4 15.6 24.4 187.2 303.6 2014 138.0 274.5 114.5 227.8 30.7 60.1 25.5 49.9 308.7 612.3 2015 243.7 518.2 202.3 430.1 53.2 113.2 44.1 94.0 543.3 1155.6 2016 443.9 962.1 368.4 798.5 101.5 214.7 84.2 178.2 998.0 2153.6 2017 642.7 1604.8 533.5 1332.0 148.9 363.6 123.6 301.8 1448.6 3602.2 2018 857.2 2462.1 711.5 2043.5 200.5 564.1 166.4 468.2 1935.7 5537.9 2019 1071.5 3533.6 889.3 2932.9 252.4 816.5 209.5 677.7 2422.8 7960.7 2020 1271.1 4804.6 1055.0 3987.8 301.2 1117.7 250.0 927.7 2877.2 10837.9 2021 1444.9 6249.5 1199.3 5187.1 344.0 1461.7 285.5 1213.2 3273.6 14111.5 2022 1585.6 7835.1 1316.1 6503.2 378.9 1840.5 314.5 1527.7 3595.0 17706.5 2023 1689.7 9524.8 1402.4 7905.6 404.9 2245.5 336.1 1863.8 3833.2 21539.7

16 Tool for afforestation and reforestation approved simplified methodologies. http://wbcarbonfinance.org/Router.cfm?Page=BioCF&FID=9708&ItemID=9708&ft=DocLib&CatalogID=44971 Stratum 1 Stratum 2 Total above and below ground biomass carbon Project above-ground biomass below-ground above-ground biomass below-ground pools year carbon pool biomass carbon pool carbon pool biomass carbon pool annual cumulative annual cumulative annual cumulative annual cumulative annual cumulative tCO e yr- tCO e yr- tCO e yr- tCO e yr- tCO e yr- year 2 tCO e 2 tCO e 2 tCO e 2 tCO e 2 tCO e 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2024 1756.6 11281.4 1458.0 9363.6 422.0 2667.5 350.3 2214.1 3986.9 25526.6 2025 1788.3 13069.8 1484.3 10847.9 430.6 3098.1 357.4 2571.4 4060.6 29587.2 2026 1788.4 14858.2 1484.4 12332.3 431.4 3529.5 358.0 2929.5 4062.2 33649.4 2027 1761.4 16619.6 1461.9 13794.3 425.5 3955.0 353.1 3282.6 4002.0 37651.4 2028 1712.1 18331.7 1421.0 15215.3 414.1 4369.1 343.7 3626.3 3890.9 41542.3 2029 1645.3 19977.0 1365.6 16580.9 398.4 4767.5 330.7 3957.0 3740.1 45282.4 2030 1565.7 21542.7 1299.6 17880.5 379.5 5146.9 315.0 4272.0 3559.7 48842.1 2031 1477.3 23020.0 1226.1 19106.6 358.3 5505.3 297.4 4569.4 3359.2 52201.2 2032 1383.5 24403.4 1148.3 20254.9 335.8 5841.1 278.7 4848.1 3146.3 55347.5 2033 1287.2 25690.6 1068.4 21323.2 312.7 6153.8 259.5 5107.6 2927.7 58275.2 2034 1190.8 26881.5 988.4 22311.6 289.4 6443.2 240.2 5347.8 2708.8 60984.1 2035 1096.2 27977.7 909.9 23221.5 266.5 6709.7 221.2 5569.0 2493.8 63477.9 2036 1004.7 28982.4 833.9 24055.4 244.4 6954.1 202.8 5771.9 2285.8 65763.8 2037 917.3 29899.7 761.4 24816.8 223.2 7177.3 185.3 5957.1 2087.1 67850.9 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

D.2. Ex-ante estimation of leakage: >> The project does not lead to a displacement or pre-project activities, therefore there is not leakage.

SECTION E. Monitoring plan

E.1. Monitoring of the project implementation: >> E.1.1. Monitoring of forest establishment and management if required for the compliance with the applicability conditions of the selected approved methodology: >> The project participants will put in place within Oceanium a Carbon Unit dedicated to monitoring processes. This unit will benefit from the expertise of a forest carbon specialist who will be hired for the design and calculations of the monitoring taking into account the information of the following sections. International consultants will support this unit in its initial phase, with an interest in internalizing the right know-how.

The Carbon Unit will determine any changes in carbon stocks via measuring and monitoring the project area that has been planted. The size of the project area in each stratum where the project activity has been implemented will be measured in the field using GPS and checked and recorded using GIS tools (already done and available for the DOE). Any changes in project boundary will be accounted in all calculations of actual net GHG removals by sinks.

E.1.2. Information on how geographic coordinates of the project boundary are established, recorded and archived: >> See Section E.1.1.

E.1.3. If required by the selected approved methodology, describe, or provide reference to, SOPs and quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) procedures undertaken for data monitored, if not included in the relevant sections below: >> A rigid quality control and quality assurance (QA/QC) method involving Standard Operating Procedures to ensure: (i) reliability of collection of field measurements, (ii) verification of the methods used to collect field data, (iii) verification of data entry and analysis techniques, (iv) verification of data maintenance and archiving and (v) upgrading of electronic data with technological changes, shall be followed as discussed below.

Procedures to ensure reliable field measurements

Collecting reliable field measurement data is an important step in the quality assurance plan. Those responsible for the measurement work will be trained in all aspects of the field data collection and data analyses. It is good practice to develop Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for each step of the field measurements, which should be adhered to at all times. These SOPs describe in detail all steps to be taken of the field measurements (including standard field forms) and contain provisions for documentation for verification purposes so that future field personnel can check past results and repeat

33/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05 the measurements in a consistent way. To secure the quality of the standard operating procedures to be established, project participants and UNEP are currently negotiating the selection of an international company in the framework of the Cascade Project with an interest in establishing such SOPs in 2011. The terms of Reference of the deed are available to DOE on request. To ensure the collection and maintenance of reliable field data:

 Field-team members will be fully aware of all procedures and the importance of collecting data as accurately as possible;  Field teams will install test plots if needed in the field and measure all pertinent components using the SOPs to estimate measurement errors;  The document will list all names of the field team and the project leader will certify that the team is trained; and  New staff will be adequately trained.

Procedures to verify field data collection

To verify that plots have been installed and the measurements taken correctly, a re-measurement of 10% of the plots by different crew members from the original field crews will be performed at the end of the fieldwork. Key data points to be re-measured are: location and size of sample plots, number, species, DBH, and heights of trees within plots. The verifying crew will be experienced in forest measurement and highly attentive to detail. After measurement, a comparison will be made with the original data and discrepancies re-verified. Field data collected at this stage will be compared with the original data. Any errors found will be corrected and recorded. Any errors discovered will be expressed as a percentage of all plots that have been rechecked to provide an estimate of the measurement error.

Data before correction- Data after correction Filed measurement error (%) = *100 (Equation 2) Data after correction

The following quality targets should be achieved for the re-measurements, and compared to the original measurements:

 Missed or extra trees: no error within the plot  Tree species: no error  D.B.H.: < ±10 %  Height: < ± 20%  Circular plot radius/sides of rectangular plot: < ± 1% of horizontal (angle-adjusted)

If the calculated measurement error is greater than the targets, then all the analyses will be rerun.

Procedures to verify data entry and analysis

The field data will be collected using field sheets, and entered into the data analysis software, where it is checked for accuracy. Possible errors in this process will be minimized by cross-checking the entry of both the field data and the laboratory data, and where necessary, incorporating internal tests into the spreadsheets to ensure that these data are realistic. Communication between all personnel involved in measuring and analysing data will be used to resolve any apparent anomalies before the final analysis of

34/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05 the monitoring data is completed. If there are any problems with the monitoring plot data that cannot be resolved, the plot will not be used in the analysis.

In an additional check, another independent person will enter data from 10 per cent of the field sheets into the data analysis software. These two data sets can then be compared to check for errors. Any errors detected will be corrected in the master file.

Number of errors among checked sample Entryerror (%) = *100 (Equation 3) Total number checked

If the calculated measurement error is greater than 10 per cent, then all data will be re-entered.

Data maintenance and storage

Because of the relatively long-term nature of these project activities, data archiving (maintenance and storage) will be an important component of the work. Data archiving should take on several forms and copies of all data should be provided to each project participant.

Copies (electronic and/or paper) of all field data, data analyses and models, estimates of the changes in carbon stocks and corresponding calculations and models used, any GIS products, as well as copies of the measuring and monitoring reports, should all be stored in a dedicated and safe place, preferably offsite. Given the time frame over which the project activity will take place and the pace of production of updated versions of software and new hardware for storing data, it is recommended that the electronic copies of the data and report be updated periodically or converted to a format that could be accessed by any future software application.

Training

Training in quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) monitoring will be provided by the international company that will be selected by UNEP in the framework of the Cascade Project.

E.2. Sampling design and stratification: >> Carbon sampling will take place within the stratified project area. The project will use permanent sample plots to monitor carbon stock changes in above and belowground biomass pools. To reach the targeted precision level of about ±10% of the mean at the 95% confidence level in a cost effective manner, the number of plots needed in each stratum (Table E-1) has been estimated following equations 1, 2, 5 and 6 in the methodological tool “Calculation of the number of sample plots for measurements within A/R 17 CDM project activities, v.02.1.0” approved by EB . Previous to each monitoring a pre-monitoring will be conducted to obtain the necessary parameters to use the tool (such as the standard deviation of total carbon stock for each stratum). In the following table, an estimation of the potential necessary plots has

17 EB report 58 annex 15: http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/ARmethodologies/tools/ar-am-tool-03-v2.1.0.pdf

35/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05 been calculated taking into account a standard deviation of 80% of the mean18, the ex-ante stratification, and the planting plan.

Equation 1 of the tool

Equation 4 of the tool

Where: n = Number of sample plots required for estimation of biomass stocks within the project boundary; dimensionless ni = Number of sample plots allocated to stratum i; dimensionless wi = Relative weight of the area of stratum i (i.e. the area of the stratum i divided by the project area); dimensionless -1 si = Estimated standard deviation of biomass stock in stratum i; t d.m. (or t d.m. ha ) E = Acceptable margin of error (i.e. one-half the confidence interval) in estimation of biomass stock within the project boundary; t d.m. (or t d.m. ha-1), i.e. in the units used for si N = Total number of possible sample plots within the project boundary (i.e. the sampling space or the population); dimensionless tVAL = Two-sided Student.s t-value, at infinite degrees of freedom, for the required confidence level; dimensionless i = 1, 2, 3, . biomass stock estimation strata within the project boundary

Table E-1. Estimation of the number of sample plots 2008 2009 GEC REC Total GEC REC Total Total Area of the stratum 1003,9 1699,8 (ha) 143,39 5,79 149,18 0 546,80 1550,69 8 Area of the plot(ha) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025

sti/mean (%) 50 50 50 50 Number of sample plots 24 1 25 167 91 258 283 GEC: Good ecological conditions; REC: Regular ecological conditions

GPS-located plots ensure consistent measuring and monitoring over time. To avoid subjective choice of plot locations, the permanent sampling plots shall be located systematically with a random start, which is considered good practice in GPG-LULUCF. This can be accomplished with the help of a GPS in the

18 A more conservative value than the proposed in Paragraph 6 of “Guidelines on conservative choice and application of default data in estimation of the net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks”. http://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Guidclarif/ar/methAR_guid26.pdf

36/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05 field. The geographic position (GPS coordinate), administrative location, stratum series number of each plot shall be recorded and archived. Distribution of sampling plots will be as evenly as possible. Several studies on the size of experimental plots concluded that trial plots of 10-15 trees give sufficient precision with regard to relative growth, height and diameter. Considering this, and the potential density at the end of the maturity (600 tree/ha), a plot size of 250 m² should be adequate for monitoring purposes. Due to the planting density (close to 10000 trees/ha) during the first monitoring processes, a smaller plot size will be necessary.

Stratification of the project area will improve the accuracy and precision of biomass estimates. All of the project area will be planted with the same species on degraded lands, even though stratification will be based on biomass growth differences. Ecological conditions of the project area are not homogeneous; a new stratification will be necessary before the monitoring process taking into account field information

E.3. Monitoring of the baseline net GHG removals by sinks, if required by the selected approved methodology: >> The baseline net GHG removals by sinks are estimated to be zero and monitoring of baseline emissions is not required.

E.4. Monitoring of the actual net GHG removals by sinks: >> The following data and parameters should be monitored during the project activity. When applying all relevant equations provided in the selected methodology for the ex-ante calculation of net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks, transparent estimations for the parameters that are monitored during the crediting period will be provided. These estimates shall be based on measured or existing published data where possible following this approach: if different values for a parameter are equally plausible, a value that does not lead to over-estimation of net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks will be selected.

Data and parameters that area available at validation:

Data / Parameter: BEF2, j Data unit: Dimensionless Used in equations: 14 of the methodology Description: Biomass expansion factor for conversion of stem biomass to above-ground biomass for tree species or group of species j Source of data: The source of data shall be selected, in order of preference, from the following: 1. Local sources of species or group of species-specific data; 2. National sources of species or group of species-specific data (e.g. national forest inventory or national GHG inventory); 3. Species or group of species-specific data from neighbouring countries with similar conditions;

37/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

4. Globally available data applicable to species or group of species; 5. IPCC default values (e.g. Table 3A.1.10 of IPCC GPG-LULUCF 2003)19 Measurement N/A procedures: Comments: BEFs in IPCC literature and national forest inventories are usually applicable to closed canopy forests. If applied to individual trees growing in open field, it is recommended that the selected BEF2 be increased by 30%

Data / Parameter: CF j Data unit: t C t-1 d.m. Used in equations: 14, 15 of the methodology Description: Carbon fraction of tree biomass for species or group of species j Source of data: The source of data, in order of preference, shall be the following: 1. National level species or group of species-specific data (e.g. from national GHG inventory); 2. Species or group of species-specific data from neighbouring countries with similar conditions; 3. Globally available data (e.g. IPCC GPG-LULUCF 2003); 4. The IPCC default value of 0.5 t C t-1 d.m. Measurement N/A procedures:

Data / Parameter: D j Data unit: t d.m. m-3 Used in equations: 14 of the methodology Description: Basic wood density for species or group of species j Source of data: The source of data, in order of preference, shall be any of the following: 1. National and species or group of species-specific data (e.g. from national forest inventory or national GHG inventory); 2. Species or group of species-specific data from neighbouring countries with similar conditions; 3. Globally available species or group of species-specific data (e.g. Table 3A.1.9 IPCC GPG-LULUCF 2003) Measurement N/A procedures:

Data / Parameter: fj(X, Y...) Data unit: t d.m. tree–1 Used in equations: 15 of the methodology

19 Although the BEFs in Table 3A.1.10 apply to biomass, the dimensionless factors can be equally applied for wood volume expansions.

38/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Description: Allometric function for species or group of species j linking, for example, tree diameter (diameter at breast height or other diameter), and possibly tree height (H), to above-ground biomass of living trees Source of data: The source of data, in order of preference, shall be any of the following: 1. Existing local and species or group of species-specific data; 2. National and species or group of species-specific data (e.g. national forest inventory or national GHG inventory); 3. Species or group of species-specific data from neighbouring countries with similar conditions; 4. Globally available data applicable to species or group of species (e.g. Tables 4.A.1–4.A.3 of IPCC GPG-LULUCF 2003) Measurement N/A procedures:

Data / Parameter: R j Data unit: Dimensionless Used in equations: 14, 15 of the methodology Description: Root-shoot ratio for species or group of species j Source of data: The source of data, in order of preference, shall be any of the following: 1. Existing local and species or group of species-specific data; 2. National and species or group of species-specific data (e.g. national forest inventory or national GHG inventory); 3. Species or group of species-specific data from neighbouring countries with similar conditions; 4. Globally available data applicable to species or group of species growing under similar conditions or similar forest type. If none of the above sources are available, then the value of Rj may be calculated as B/A where B = exp[-1.085+0.9256*ln(A)], where A is above- ground biomass (t d.m. ha-1) and B is below-ground biomass (t d.m. ha-1) [Source: Table 4.A.4 of IPCC GPG-LULUCF 2003] Measurement N/A procedures:

Data / Parameter: VTREE , j, p,i Data unit: m3 Used in equations: 14 of the methodology Description: Stem volume of trees of species or group of species j in plot p in stratum i Source of data: The source of data, in order of preference, shall be the following: 1. Existing local and species or group of species-specific tree growth data or local volume tables; 2. National and species or group of species-specific tree growth data or standard volume tables (e.g. from national forest inventory or national GHG inventory); 3. Species or group of species-specific tree growth data or volume tables from neighbouring countries with similar conditions; 4. Globally available data applicable to species or group of species

39/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Measurement N/A procedures: Comments: In case of ex ante estimation, it would not be possible to measure diameter of trees to be used in volume tables. In such cases, species-specific or group of species-specific age-diameter curves from local/national sources may be used to estimate the diameter at a given point of time. Age of trees in baseline may be estimated from historical records, participatory appraisal, or tree dendrometry methods. If such age-diameter curves are not available then average growing stock values from Table 3A.1.4 of IPCC GPG-LULUCF 2003 may be multiplied by the fractional value of estimated crown cover of trees. For example, if crown cover of trees is estimated as 10% and the project is located in Cameroon (growing stock volume of 135 m3/ha), then the stem volume of trees may be estimated as 0.10×135 = 13.50 m3/ha

Data and parameters that are monitored:

Data / Parameter: Ai Data unit: Ha Used in equations: 16 of the methodology Description: Area of tree biomass stratum i Source of data: Monitoring of strata and stand boundaries shall be done preferably using a Geographical Information System (GIS), which allows for integrating data from different sources (including GPS coordinates and Remote Sensing data) Measurement See paragraph 1(b) of Section III of the methodology procedures: Monitoring Every five years since the year of the initial verification frequency: QA/QC procedures: See paragraph 1(b) of Section III of the methodology

Data / Parameter: ai,p Data unit: m2 Used in equations: Implicitly used in Equation 15 of the methodology Description: Area of sampling frame for plot p in stratum i Source of data: Simple measurement or manufacturer’s data Measurement See paragraph 1(b) of Section III of the methodology procedures: Monitoring Every five years since the year of the initial verification frequency: QA/QC procedures: See paragraph 1(b) of Section III of the methodology Comments: Once selected, the size of the sampling frame shall be fixed until the end of the last crediting period

Data / Parameter: Ap,i Data unit: Ha

40/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Used in equations: 16 of the methodology Description: Total area of all sample plots in stratum i Source of data: Field measurement Measurement See paragraph 1(b) of Section III of the methodology procedures: Monitoring Every five years since the year of the initial verification frequency: QA/QC procedures: See paragraph 1(b) of Section III of the methodology

Data / Parameter: DBH Data unit: inch/cm or any unit of length used in the model or data source used Used in equations: Implicitly used in Equation 14, 15 of the methodology Description: Usually the diameter at breast height of the tree; but it could be any other diameter or dimensional measurement used in the model or data source used, e.g. basal diameter, root-collar diameter, basal area, etc. Source of data: Field measurements in sample plots. For ex ante estimations, DBH values should be estimated using a growth curve, a growth model, or a yield table that gives the expected tree dimensions as a function of tree age Measurement See paragraph 1(b) of Section III of the methodology procedures: Monitoring Every five years since the year of the initial verification frequency: QA/QC See paragraph 1(b) of Section III of the methodology procedures:

Data / Parameter: H Data unit: m or any other unit of length Used in equations: Implicitly used in Equation 14, 15 of the methodology Description: Height of tree Source of data: Field measurements in sample plots. For ex ante estimations, H values should be estimated using a growth curve, a growth model, or a yield table that gives the expected tree dimensions as a function of tree age Measurement See paragraph 1(b) of Section III of the methodology procedures: Monitoring Every five years since the year of the initial verification frequency: QA/QC See paragraph 1(b) of Section III of the methodology procedures: Comments: Models used may be based on units of length other than metre (e.g. feet), in which case the appropriate unit of length only should be used

Data / Parameter: T Data unit: Year Used in equations: 12 of the methodology Description: Time period elapsed between two successive estimations of carbon stock in a carbon pool

41/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Source of data: Recorded time Measurement N/A procedures: Comments: If the two successive estimations of carbon stock in a carbon pool are carried out at different points of time in year t2 and t1, (e.g. in the month of April in year t1 and in the month of September in year t2), then a fractional value shall be assigned to T

E.5. Leakage: >> Previous to the project activity there are no grazing, agriculture and fuel wood collection activities inside the project boundaries. Consequently, following Decision 6/CMP.1, Annex, Appendix B, Paragraph 9, leakage estimation is not required. Therefore, it is not necessary to monitor leakage (Ltv = 0).

E.5.1. Proposed measures to be implemented to minimize potential leakage: >> N/A

E.5.2. Specify the procedures for the periodic review of implementation of activities and measures to minimize leakage, if required by the selected approved methodology: >> N/A

E.6. Provide any additional quality control (QC) and quality assurance (QA) procedures undertaken for data monitored not included in section E.1.3: >>

E.7. Please describe the operational and management structure(s) that the project proponents will implement in order to monitor actual net GHG removals by sinks and any leakage generated by the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> A Monitoring Unit staffed with well-trained members will conduct the field survey and collect data from the permanent sample plots (Oceanium, with the scientific and technical support of the international company to be selected in the framework of the Cascade Project implemented by UNEP). A series of manuals will be specifically designed for the project monitoring to ensure that field teams will not have difficulty in following the plans. The data will be processed and calculated in accordance with the applied methodology. Oceanium supported by the international company selected in the framework of the Cascade Project, with its forestry experts, will review the compiled data and complete the monitoring report for the verification. The monitoring report will be sent to DOE for verification when the quality of the report has been assured.

42/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

SECTION F. Environmental impacts of the proposed A/R CDM project activity

F.1. Documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts, including impacts on biodiversity and natural ecosystems, and impacts outside the project boundary of the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> The proposed project will consist of a restoration of degraded wetlands by reforesting the mangrove. The potential negative impacts of a reforestation activity will be minimal in this project case because of its specific characteristics, such as:

 Use of native species ecologically adapted to the project area  No use of fertilizers and pesticides (no negative impacts to the fauna and flora)  No site preparation. Pre-existing scarce vegetation will be left standing and soil preparation will not be necessary  Manual activities. Propagule collection, transporting inside the project area and planting will be done manually. No machinery will be used for these activities; therefore, there will be no negative impacts on the air quality, water, soil (compactation and pollution), vegetation, (pollution and direct damages) and on the fauna (noise, pollution and habitat alteration).

There are only two potential negative environmental impacts:

 Pollution and perturbations due to the use of vehicles for labour force and propagule transportation outside the project boundaries. The environmental impacts of these activities are not relevant because the transportation will be done on existing roads already anthropogenically- impacted, therefore the project will not contribute to an increase of the environmental impacts. New roads will not be necessary for the project implementation; and,

 Fauna perturbation during the propagule collection and the planting activities. Both activities are done manually and during short periods of time (1-2 days per planting site); thus, the potential for impacts are minimal. On the other hand, the sites are fragmented into very small parcels far away from each other enough so as not to create a critical mass that could cause important fauna perturbations.

The environmental impacts of the project are predominantly positive, as the reforestation activities will increase habitat available to wildlife, increase biodiversity, improve soil conservation and water conditions. The increase and preservation of biodiversity in the area can be considered as one of the most significant benefits of the project as it will contribute to the conservation of one of the most diverse ecological areas in Senegal.

F.2. If any negative impact is considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, a statement that project participants have undertaken an environmental impact assessment, in accordance with the procedures required by the host Party, including conclusions and all references to support documentation: >> No significant negative environmental impact is foreseen. In relation to Annex I and II of the Government Decree N° 2001 – 282 dated 12 of April 2001 Containing the Application of the Environmental Code and according to the Law Nº 2001 – 01 dated 15 of January 2001 Containing the

43/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Environmental Code, there is no need to perform an Environmental Impact Assessment as validated (Refer to Annex 9) by the Ministry of Environment (“Direction de l´Environnement et des Etablissements Classés”).

F.3. Description of planned monitoring and remedial measures to address significant impacts referred to in section F.2. above: >> N/A

SECTION G. Socio-economic impacts of the proposed A/R CDM project activity

G.1. Documentation on the analysis of the major socio-economic impacts, including impacts outside the project boundary of the proposed A/R CDM project activity: >> One of the main objectives of the project is the restoration of the ecological, economic, and social services of the degraded wetlands of the project area. The project will contribute to poverty reduction, in the short term through employment and in the mid-term through sustainable collection of mangrove products.

Employment opportunities

The project will provide employment opportunities for the communities surrounding the project area. Oceanium will hire about 56 people of the local communities during the project implementation to organize the plantation (contact with local communities, environmental awareness, propagule collection and planting). In Casamance, 43 people will be hired, including: 15 area managers (one per area), 20 people for the headquarters office in Bignona, and 8 people for the headquarter office in Kolda. In Sine Saloum, 13 people will be hired: 6 area managers (one per area) as well as 7 people for the headquarters office in Toubaocuta. During the baseline study and the plantation boundary measurement, 5-7 local environmental experts will be hired by IUCN. Specific information of the contracts and responsibilities of those hired people will be provided to the DOE on request.

Once the project area has been planted, it is expected that during the monitoring process a small number of additional employment opportunities will become available.

Improvement of mangroves´ socioeconomic services

Improving the ecological conditions of wetlands will create concomitant socio-cultural benefits. It is expected to lead to an increase in the production of wood, fish, shellfish, oyster, and crab production leading to positive socioeconomic impacts. In some project areas, the improvement of environmental conditions will also have potential positive impacts on ecotourism. The improvement of these goods and services of the mangrove will lead to an improvement of the socioeconomic conditions of the local communities.

Capacity building

During the project, several workshops will contribute to the improvement of knowledge of the local people on environment conservation, mangrove restoration, and resources management. With all this new

44/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05 knowledge there will be both mid and long term positive environmental and socioeconomic impacts (see details in section A.5.4).

Other positive impacts

During the campaigns, propagule collection and planting participating groups are paid per bag of propagules. The benefits of these activities were generally distributed in the social group participating in the activities (Sports and Cultural Association, Grouping of Economic Interest, Grouping inter-villages, Community Basic organization). The incomes were distributed within the members of the group or reinvested in a social activity.

Oceanium participates during the project promoting social events not directly linked with the reforestation (meals, parties, sport events, etc.).

Training and awareness of the local people

Oceanium’s main objective is boosting local community awareness about the importance of environment conservation. Please see details of training and awareness in section A.5.4.

There is no negative impact that is considered significant by the project participants or the host party. On the contrary, the socio-economic impacts are expected to be positive.

G.2. If any negative impact is considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, a statement that project participants have undertaken a socio-economic impact assessment, in accordance with the procedures required by the host Party, including conclusions and all references to supporting documentation: >>N/A

G.3. Description of planned monitoring and remedial measures to address significant impacts referred to in section G.2 above: >> There are no expected negative impacts; positive socioeconomic impacts will be monitored in approximately project year 5.

SECTION H. Stakeholders’ comments

H.1. Brief description of how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled: >> To have the support of local population, Oceanium has spent 5 years in the delta villages to develop an awareness program explaining the problems met by the mangrove deforestation and the consequences in the everyday life of the villagers. For this, Oceanium uses a tool: the cinema/meeting (see details in section A.5.4). During the projection several persons are invited to express their opinion on the project and to ask such questions as "Why to reforest the mangrove?" or "How to reforest the mangrove?". During the first phases of these meetings, only the influential people of the village participate (leader of the village, person in charge of women or of young people), but by the end of the projection, all present at the assembly may ask questions. The Oceanium responsible area manager tries to answer all of the questions and notes are taken of the remarks.

45/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Following this cinema/meeting, the villagers choose whether or not to reforest. They also choose, with the support of the Oceanium area manager, the place and the date of the plantation. For the viability of the project, the local populations sign (through the village leader) a commitment with Oceanium not to cut these plantations.

The plantation campaign has received attention from local media; several journalists have written or filmed interviews with persons who have participated in the campaign. Generally, these interviews become portions of newspaper articles or documentary movies about the awareness program.

Table H-1. Detail of the documentary, clip, song and slide presentation elaborated during the campaigns Type Name Year Duration Realized by 30 millions de palétuviers - émoi, Documentary 2009 4 min / 12 min / 26 min Christophe Rouvière émoi … Arnaud Wurst / La Troisième Porte Documentary Plante ton Arbre 2008 3 min / 17 min à Gauche Documentary Reboisement 2008 40 min Arnaud Wurst Documentary Bamboung, un exemple à suivre 2008 26 min Christophe Rouvière Clip Reboisement 2009 4.30 min Baye Dia Clip Keur Bamboung 2008 4.20 min Baye Dia Song - 2008 3.40 min Abdou Elinkine Guide Technique des PowerPoint 2008/2009 - Oceanium Reboisements PowerPoint La Mangrove en Guinée Bissau 2008 - Oceanium

The carbon component of the project activities has never been the main pillar of Oceanium communication purposes. A so complex topic was not adapted to the scope of the cinema/meetings. This is why Oceanium organized specific technical meetings during the campaign with area managers. During these meetings, the relationship between Oceanium and Danone was explained as well as the financing sources of the project.

To know the local population’s opinion on the financing and the progress of the campaign and the carbon component, a survey was elaborated. 24 questionnaires were filled by the Oceanium responsible area managers, Oceanium team, resource persons, villages, etc.

Finally, each “Communauté Rurale” has to sign an agreement with Oceanium in accordance with the Senegalese law in order to allow Oceanium to implement project activities in the public or maritime domain while clarifying the carbon component of project activities, especially in terms of revenues flows. Signing agreement needs upstream a deliberation of the council of the rural community, each council being likely to gather around 50 people. That means in other words that more than 50 rural communities or more than 2500 people took or will take part in this in-depth negotiation.

H.2. Summary of the comments received: >> Cinema/meetings:

46/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

As mentioned above, the local stakeholders were mobilized and involved in the project during the campaign and cinema/meetings. The people were motivated by the project and they perceived future benefits from the mangrove reforestation. See below a summary of the benefits perceived and not perceived by local population

Future benefits perceived by local stakeholders Future benefits note perceived

- Improvement of areas for fish reproduction - Decrease in erosion - Improvement of privileged areas for shell - Change in the biochemistry of soil reproduction - Landscape improvement leading to a potential - Improvement of oyster fixation improvement of ecotourism, developed in - Improved beekeeping activity certain parts of Senegal (Joal Fadiouth, Cap - Lowered salinity in the delta: facilitating rice Skiring). cultivation - Improved environment for several species (birds, crab violinist, monkey green, gull, stork, etc.)

There was no objection by the local community to the mangrove restoration; furthermore, the project was considered by the local communities to be a source of future benefit.

Survey:

The main responses to the survey are summarized in the following paragraphs:

Partnership with Danone

83 % of people interviewed know that Danone is the Oceanium main partner of the campaign. Furthermore, 54,2 % of these people consider that the partnership with Danone is necessary for the realization of the project. 33,3 % of the interviewees go even further by thinking that this partnership is indispensable to the project. The last 12,5 % had no opinion.

Carbon Credits

Figure H-1. Result of the question about carbon credits

47/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

44 % of people interviewed think that the reason why Danone finances the project is related to the carbon credits or the reduction of the pollution emitted by their factories. To support this last point, M.D. admits that Danone finances because it participated in the global warming by its products which it makes (parce qu’il a participé au réchauffement de la planète par ses produits qu’il fabrique). 28 % think that Danone finances to the global warming fights.

The local populations realize that Danone can benefit from this project because as says C.N.: It is a profitable project for the population but also for the backer (C’est un projet rentable pour la population mais également pour le bailleur).

General opinions

The local population is very satisfied with this campaign, and also how the partnership evolved. For example H.D. considers that the financial contribution was based on the success of the plantation campaign (l’apport financier a été déterminant dans la réussite de la campagne de reboisement). He also thinks that the project allowed an awakening of the ecological consciousness of the rural masses who are very enthusiastic and believe that this project will save their ecosystem (le projet a permis d’éveiller la conscience écologique de la masse rurale qui est très enthousiaste et croit que ce projet sauvera l’écosystème).

Some like M.N think that this project favours peace in Casamance (favorise la paix en Casamance) (Casamance, South area of Senegal is involved in an internal conflict for several years with rebels). Furthermore, they believe the project is welcomed because the current degradation of the environment requires it. It is allowing the reduction of ecological disasters (I.S) (ce projet est bienvenu car la dégradation actuelle de l’environnement l’exige. Il va permettre de réduire les catastrophes écologiques).

Global warming

48/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Most interviewees recognize that the mangrove plantations are going to counter global warming. Here is a summary table of the main comments about this subject:

Table H-2. Opinion on the benefits of the plantation Comments* Number of people CO2 Absorption 9 O2 Production 4 Fight against the desert encroachment 2 Fight against global warming 9 Increase of the rainfall 6 Salinity regulation 1 Temperature regulation 3 Limit the erosion 2 Fertilize the ground 1 * Each person can express several opinions

Population request

Several remarks were heard by Oceanium during the campaign. The most recurring theme involved important financial support for the villagers who reforest. So K.S. says that more logistic and financial means are needed to help the population to fight against the poverty and the rural exodus (plus de moyens logistiques et financiers pour aider la population à lutter contre la pauvreté et l’exode rurale.). Another idea is that there were more partners (qu’il y ait plus de partenaires) (M.N) to help the project.

Another request by local populations is the plantation of other trees species. So B.C. proposes that the project involves plantation of other trees species that are able to support the mangrove and facilitate its development more quickly (propose que le projet implique le reboisement d’autres espèces d’arbres pour pouvoir soutenir la mangrove et favoriser son développement de manière plus rapide).

H.D. thinks it would be necessary to maintain staff to make the revisit reforested sites in the dry season (maintenir un personnel de l’encadrement pour le suivi des sites reboisés en saison sèche).

Finally, the Oceanium area manager wishes more training to prepare them for another campaign, S.D. suggests that agents should obtain more trainings to be more successful (suggère que les agents bénéficient de formations pour qu’ils soient plus performants).

H.3. Report on how due account was taken of any comments received: >> Local populations suggested ideas were considered by Oceanium during plantation campaigns.

49/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Annex 1

ANNEX 1: CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROPOSED A/R CDM PROJECT ACTIVITY

Organization: Danone Street/P.O.Box: 17, boulevard Haussmann Building: City: PARIS State/Region: Postfix/ZIP: 75009 Country: France Telephone: 33 1 44 35 20 20 FAX: 33 1 44 35 20 17 E-Mail: URL: www.danone.com Represented by: Mr. Jean-Pierre Rennaud Title: Environment Director Salutation: Last Name: Rennaud Middle Name: First Name: Jean-Pierre Department: Environment dept. Mobile: 33 6 46 31 58 69 Direct FAX: 33 1 44 35 20 17 Direct tel: 33 1 44 35 20 84 Personal E-Mail: [email protected]

Organization: ORBEO Street/P.O.Box: 17 cours Valmy Building: Tour Société Générale City: Paris La Defense State/Region: Postcode/ZIP: 92987 Country: France Telephone: +33 (0)1 53 56 61 01 FAX: +33 (0)1 53 56 61 10 E-Mail: [email protected] URL: www.orbeo.com Represented by: Philippe Rosier Title: President Salutation: Last name: ROSIER Middle name: First name: Philippe

50/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Department: Mobile: Direct FAX: +33 (0)1 53 56 61 10 Direct tel: +33 (0)1 53 56 61 32 Personal e-mail: [email protected]

Annex 2 ANNEX 2: INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING

At this moment no public funding is involved; however, once the project starts, additional activities such as mangrove management, nature conservation and capacity building of the local community might be supported with public funding. This public funding does not result in a diversion of official development assistance (ODA), is separate from, and not counted towards the financial obligations of those Parties.

Annex 3 ANNEX 3: BASELINE INFORMATION See Section C.6

Annex 4 ANNEX 4: MONITORING PLAN See Section E

51/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Annex 5 ANNEX 5: COORDINATES OF PROJECT BOUNDARY Table An.5-1. Coordinates of Sine Saloum parcels Rural Perimeter Centroid_UTM Centroid_UTM Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) X Y year Ndangane Site 1 Fatick Fatick Fimla Fimla Ndangane 2.28 1396 315779.28 1555812.12 2009 Mbissel Site 1 Fatick Fatick Fissel Mbabane Palmarin Mbissel 10.32 3105 310484.01 1563915.7 2009 Mbissel Site 3 Fatick Fatick Fissel Mbabane Palmarin Mbissel 0.66 670 310486.46 1563698.27 2009 Bambougar El Bambougar Site 2 Fatick Foundiougne Djilor Ndiossong Hadji 0.84 401 347577.96 1536080.59 2009 Bambougar El Bambougar Site 5 Fatick Foundiougne Djilor Ndiossong Hadji 0.69 391 348214.43 1536053.35 2009 Madina Site 3 Fatick Foundiougne Foundiougne Toubacouta Madina 0.85 998 342262.56 1528021.18 2009 Bassoul Site 1 Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Bassoul Bassoul 0.73 715 330374.73 1537588.52 2009 Bassoul Site 2 Parcelle A Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Bassoul Bassoul 0.85 732 330228.38 1537752.92 2009 Thialane Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Bassoul Thialane 1.19 706 323650.14 1538945.38 2009 Niodior Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Dionewar Niodior 3.48 1760 314672.13 1531029.76 2009 Diamniadio Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Djirnda Diamniadio 2.87 1226 330239.01 1557696.54 2009 Djirnda Site 5 Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Djirnda Djirnda 2.47 781 326828.52 1545090.22 2009 Djirnda Site 6 Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Djirnda Djirnda 0.84 505 327761.72 1545772.98 2009 Djirnda Site 7 Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Djirnda Djirnda 5.60 2893 322240.32 1549229 2009 Djirnda Site 8 Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Djirnda Djirnda 3.16 1294 321706.47 1549639.91 2009 Djirnda Site 4 Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Djirnda Djirnda 4.73 2901 327259.9 1544919.15 2009 Fambine Site 1 Parcelle A Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Djirnda Fambine 1.36 805 328231.59 1547219.35 2009 Maya Site 1 Parcelle A Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Djirnda Maya 8.92 2834 328681.32 1547410.37 2009 Maya Site 1 Parcelle B Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Djirnda Maya 2.96 1617 328494.53 1546938.45 2009 Maya Site 2 Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Djirnda Maya 4.45 2594 329826.67 1548200.97 2009 52/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid_UTM Centroid_UTM Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) X Y year Maya Site 3 Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Djirnda Maya 0.96 482 330183.7 1547858.37 2009 Mounde Site 1 Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Djirnda Mounde 2.85 1754 321000.63 1541076.49 2009 Ngiadior Fatick Foundiougne Niodior Djirnda Ngiadior 2.31 1027 327845.59 1542853.94 2009 Missirah Site 4 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Missirah Missirah 2.26 2370 337594.35 1511994.01 2009 Baria Site 1 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Saloum Diane Baria 1.43 716 372847.18 1512154.68 2009 Baria Site 6 Parcelle B Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Saloum Diane Baria 0.88 2098 371467.28 1512337.65 2009 Baria Site 7 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Saloum Diane Baria 0.64 1885 371629.37 1512167.35 2009 Baria Stie 9 Parcelle A Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Saloum Diane Baria 0.76 651 374229.87 1511116.64 2009 Baria Site 3 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Saloum Diane Baria 1.04 869 373255.84 1511760.38 2009 Baria Site 2 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Saloum Diane Baria 1.61 1100 373139.16 1511974.22 2009 Baria Site 4 Parcelle B Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Saloum Diane Baria 1.08 859 373389.24 1511862.06 2009 Baria Site 4 Parcelle A Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Saloum Diane Baria 5.38 3168 373962.08 1511573.14 2009 Baria Site 3 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Saloum Diane Baria 1.64 1178 373972.49 1511375 2009 Baria Site 6 Parcelle A Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Saloum Diane Baria 1.08 1540 372366.53 1512478.12 2009 Koular Site 4 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Saloum Diane Koular 6.08 3194 374412.03 1511872.29 2009 Koular Site 2 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Saloum Diane Koular 4.65 3490 372820.18 1512842.58 2009 Koular Site 3 Parcelle A Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Saloum Diane Koular 0.61 1093 373235.59 1512596.32 2009 Bani Site 1 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Bani 1.64 981 340091.68 1521583.85 2009 Bani Site 2 Parcelle A Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Bani 0.72 811 339944.07 1522732.89 2009 Keur Sambel Site 2 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Keur Sambel 0.80 791 349225 1529937.23 2009 Keur Sambel Site 1 Parcelle A Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Keur Sambel 0.71 724 348407.71 1529704.18 2009 Keur Sambel Site 3 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Keur Sambel 0.96 1124 350204 1530321.86 2009 Madina Site 1 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Madina 3.52 2102 342617.76 1528706.62 2009 Ndiambang Site 5 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Ndiambang 1.15 723 347458.94 1533268.76 2009 Ndiambang Site 6 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Ndiambang 0.77 755 347440.75 1533584.14 2009

53/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid_UTM Centroid_UTM Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) X Y year Ndofane Site 1 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Ndofane 1.79 1015 351481.89 1533251.62 2009 Ndofane Site 2 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Ndofane 1.57 1058 351595.63 1533430.54 2009 Sandicoly Site 1 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Sandicoly 0.89 591 346842.36 1529813.83 2009 Sandicoly Site 2 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Sandicoly 0.86 752 346264.29 1530011.23 2009 Sandicoly Site 6 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Sandicoly 0.55 517 348348.53 1530127.9 2009 Sandicoly Site 12 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Sandicoly 0.85 586 346411.4 1529997.34 2009 Sandicoly Site 15 Parcelle A Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Sandicoly 0.58 608 340594.49 1532161.08 2009 Sandicoly Site 15 Parcelle B Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Sandicoly 1.84 761 340488.28 1531927.01 2009 Sandicoly Site 16 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Sandicoly 1.04 522 340246.98 1531574.64 2009 Sandicoly Site 11 Parcelle A Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Sandicoly 0.98 1246 346711.77 1529975.45 2009 Sandicoly Site 11 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Sandicoly 2.47 1991 340508.89 1532661.92 2009 Sangako Site 7 Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Sangako 0.53 657 342611.05 1527387.49 2009 Sourou Site 1 Parcelle B Fatick Foundiougne Toubacouta Toubacouta Sourou 0.68 616 340018.83 1521358.41 2009 Fadial Fadiouth Site 5 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 2.92 1070 304516.23 1566819.78 2009 Ngousse Diohe Site 16 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Fadiouth 0.53 571 305931.79 1563647.45 2009 Ngousse Diohe Site 1 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Fadiouth 0.68 729 305648.32 1563003.55 2009 Ngousse Diohe Site 12 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Fadiouth 1.34 874 305807.63 1564020.65 2009 Ngousse Diohe Site 8 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Fadiouth 2.13 2657 305086.36 1564825.74 2009 Fadial Fadiouth Site 3 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 1.77 1261 305434.31 1566314.63 2009 Fadial Fadiouth Site 4 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 1.32 1143 305110.4 1566656.17 2009 Fadial Fadiouth Site 6 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 2.51 1321 304238.58 1566880.73 2009 Fadial Fadiouth Site 9 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 1.25 624 304777.69 1566725.3 2009 Fadial Fadiouth Site 10 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 2.67 1191 306808.58 1564202.86 2009 Fassanda Site 1 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 0.76 657 302206.36 1566609.35 2009 Fassanda Site 2 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 0.52 476 302520.37 1566922.85 2009 Fadiouth Four Composte Site Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 1.47 1121 301329.87 1567314.83 2009 54/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid_UTM Centroid_UTM Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) X Y year 3

Mama Guedj Site 1 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 0.87 647 301989.6 1566198.68 2009 Mama Guedj Site 2 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 0.67 419 302096.95 1566169.52 2009 Fadial Fadiouth Site 1 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 1.33 1023 305613.59 1566085.95 2009 Fadiouth Cimentiere Site 1 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 1.40 1525 302550.63 1565896.95 2009 Fadial Fadiouth Site 12 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 6.36 2961 306053.12 1565867.85 2009 Fassanda Site 15 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 1.25 837 303072.72 1566997.73 2009 Fassanda Site 4 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 0.57 827 302723.75 1566796.85 2009 Fadial Fadiouth Site 11 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 8.81 3872 306547.7 1565260.2 2009 Fadiouth Cimentiere Site 4 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 0.54 619 302337.31 1565851.61 2009 Fassanda Site 3 Thies Mbour Joal Fadiouth Joal Fadiouth Joal 1.54 1209 302753.32 1567018.05 2009 Fadial Site 1 Thies Mbour Sessene Ngueniene Fadial 1.87 710 309507.76 1563622.16 2009 Fadial Site 2 Thies Mbour Sessene Ngueniene Fadial 5.63 1426 309125.91 1563547.2 2009 Mamsignan Site 3 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Mamsignan 0.65 1627 376901.61 1509158.34 2009 Koutango Site 4 Parcelle A Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Koutango 2.99 1276 383721.53 1510268.45 2009 Mandera Site 5 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Mandera 0.68 1440 383916.94 1504127.56 2009 Ndiayene Site 1 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Ndiayene 0.77 916 387231.45 1504429.23 2009 Ndiayene Site 5 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Ndiayene 0.81 939 387041.39 1504033.04 2009 Ndiayene Site 8 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Ndiayene 0.65 749 388444.55 1504321.61 2009 Ndiayene Site 7 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Ndiayene 0.61 1202 386860.98 1504006 2009 Nidji Site 1 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Nidji 1.57 1203 375137.88 1511821.92 2009 Nidji Site 4 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Nidji 3.13 1567 375269.07 1511407.3 2009 Nidji Site 2 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Nidji 2.77 1641 375513.11 1510900.5 2009 Saboya Site 5 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Saboya 0.54 940 381847.34 1505197.91 2009 Santhie Dianko Site 2 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Santhie Dianko 1.72 646 370772.04 1513305.66 2009 Santhie Dianko Site 4 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Santhie Dianko 1.24 544 370804.99 1513185.08 2009 55/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid_UTM Centroid_UTM Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) X Y year Soukouto Site 4 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Soukouto 3.76 1909 376455.12 1509962.55 2009 Soukouto Site 2 Kaolack Nioro du Rip Wack Ngouna Wack Ngouna Soukouto 1.09 1454 376895.78 1509625.08 2009

Table An.5-2. Coordinates of Casamance parcels Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Aloutte Diola Site 2 Sedhiou Bounkiling Bona Bona Aloutte Diola 1.31 2180 392420.02 1428068.58 2008 Coumbamor Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Bounkiling Bona Bona Diacounda 0.85 687 396287.65 1426004.31 2008 Coumbamor Site 1 Parcelle B Sedhiou Bounkiling Bona Bona Diacounda 0.61 850 396270.33 1426330.47 2008 Diagnoding Site 1 Parcelle B Sedhiou Bounkiling Bona Bona Diacounda 0.65 2724 401772.15 1404221.86 2008 Diagnoding Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Bounkiling Bona Bona Dialang 1.18 3448 400709.51 1403343.34 2008 Kantinko Sedhiou Bounkiling Bona Bona Katinko 0.69 420 404542.3 1430424.14 2008 Koulikan Sedhiou Bounkiling Bona Bona Koulikan 0.61 1329 395507.75 1434258.45 2008 Mambigne Sedhiou Bounkiling Bona Bona Mambigne 0.88 695 407518.45 1433076.85 2008 Salabe Nord Sedhiou Bounkiling Bona Bona Salabe Nord 1.98 3202 397236.23 1425324.25 2008 Baconding Site 1 Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Djibanar Baconding 2.62 2206 406592.61 1390569.76 2008 Birkama Site 2 Parcelle B Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Djibanar Birkama 0.67 1108 409227.06 1388929.73 2008 Kanema Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Kaour Kanema 13.19 2458 398804.36 1390785.55 2009 Kaour Site 1 Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Kaour Kaour 1.03 1088 400815.06 1390303.98 2009 Kaour Site 2 Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Kaour Kaour 0.52 1479 401414.51 1390231.15 2009 Kaour Site 1 Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Kaour Kaour 1.05 3677 401051.13 1390217.96 2008 Kaour Mangane Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Kaour Kaour Mangane 1.37 766 399781.42 1390324.81 2008 Kaour Mankagne Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Kaour Kaour Mankagne 2.26 619 399950.56 1390310.23 2009 56/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Mangacounda Site 1 Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Kaour Mangacounda 1.31 2661 397408.09 1392079.01 2009 Mangacounda Site 2 Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Kaour Mangacounda 0.96 2284 396315.71 1392665.43 2009 Mangacounda Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Kaour Mangacounda 0.63 1676 397603.55 1391962.11 2008 Simbandi Amdalaye Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Amdalaye 0.96 941 427018.69 1387987.94 2009 Simbandi Amdalaye Site 1 Parcelle B Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Amdalaye 0.87 738 427222.09 1387351.11 2009 Simbandi Anice Site 1 Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Anice 0.64 1611 420238.5 1391337.25 2008 Simbandi Limana Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Limana 1.92 707 431654.51 1383878.09 2009 Simbandi Limana Site 1 Parcelle B Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Limana 1.27 745 431310.36 1383898.59 2009 Simbandi Limana Site 2 Parcelle A Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Limana 2.20 827 431053.94 1383102.64 2009 Simbandi Limana Site 2 Parcelle B Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Limana 0.75 728 431282.6 1382890.22 2009 Simbandi Mandina Assaye Site 2 Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Mandina Assaye 0.82 1267 416186.06 1389887.3 2009 Simbandi Mandina Balante Site 3 Par B Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Mandina Balante 1.51 1875 417704.31 1391923.65 2009 Simbandi Simbandi Balante Site 1 Par A Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Simbandi Balante 0.53 629 416580.3 1390969.21 2009 Simbandi Simbandi Balante Site 8 Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Simbandi Balante 0.86 439 416230.07 1389015.48 2009 Simbandi Simbandi Balante Site 1 Par B Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Simbandi Balante 1.00 1220 416493.57 1390834.42 2009 Simbandi Thiar Site 2 Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Thiar 0.72 802 422783.21 1390798.72 2009 Simbandi Thiar Site 1 Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Balante Thiar 1.56 1060 422362.65 1390865.62 2009 Sina Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Yarang Sina 1.02 692 434893.44 1387069.64 2009 Sina Site 2 Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Yarang Sina 1.08 1254 433836.71 1386316.04 2009 Sina Site 1 Parcelle B Sedhiou Goudomp Djibanar Yarang Sina 0.79 1285 434471.72 1387020.7 2009 57/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Bani Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djende Sakar Bani 6.31 4865 453954.16 1418887.58 2009 Bani Site 1 Parcelle B Sedhiou Sedhiou Djende Sakar Bani 1.27 983 453664.12 1419179.78 2009 Bani Site 2 Sedhiou Sedhiou Djende Sakar Bani 4.84 4844 454629.59 1418377.09 2009 Bemet Diattacouda Site 1 Par A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djibabouya Bemet Bijini Bemet Diattacouda 0.55 1747 390397.6 1405760.43 2008 Diao Simacounda Sedhiou Sedhiou Djibabouya Bemet Bijini Diao Simacounda 3.46 3748 393310.55 1401251.23 2008 Diao Soukoutoto Site 2 Par A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djibabouya Bemet Bijini Diao Soukoutoto 1.78 2481 392426.65 1402034.31 2008 Diao Ba Site 2 Sedhiou Sedhiou Djibabouya Benet Diao Ba 0.52 1278 391182.73 1402254.1 2009 Dionguer Dionguer Mand Site 1 Par A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djibabouya Sansanba Mandingue 3.04 3201 401037.46 1426676.22 2009 Dionguer Dionguer Mand Site 1 Par B Sedhiou Sedhiou Djibabouya Sansanba Mandingue 2.21 2505 400734.28 1427601.5 2009 Badiary Site 1 Parcelle B Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Badiary 1.11 2017 439220.37 1395192.92 2009 Badiary Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Badiary 1.30 1998 439360.91 1395390.68 2009 Bambaly Site 1 Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Bambaly 1.05 2466 427458.61 1394224.6 2009 Bambaly Site 3 Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Bambaly 0.51 1530 428379.48 1392794.93 2009 Bouno Site 2 Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Bouno 0.77 1021 435609.76 1391195.61 2009 Maroncounda Site 4 Parcelle C Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Maroncounda 0.52 1163 427975.04 1388345.08 2009 Maroncounda Site 3 Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Maroncounda 0.79 1738 428530.5 1387884.19 2009 Maroncounda Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Maroncounda 0.72 1146 429479.71 1387296.44 2009 Massaria Site 3 Parcelle A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Massaria 0.55 2188 432192.73 1388423.68 2009 Missira Site 3 Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Missira 0.85 2396 432910.38 1388821.28 2009 Tambanaba Site 3 Parcelle A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Tambanaba 0.50 948 441094.92 1400279.42 2009 Tambanaba Site 1 Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Tambanaba 2.22 3108 440577.42 1401810.62 2009 Tambananding Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Tambanading 1.58 3493 441670.76 1399409.69 2009 Tambananding Site 1 Parcelle B Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Bambaly Tambanading 4.57 3374 441927.05 1398558.28 2009 Badoly Site 1 Parcelle C Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Badoly 0.67 2820 401118.68 1393494.72 2009 58/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Boumouda Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Boumouda 0.81 694 395893.08 1397435.23 2009 Boumouda Site 1 Parcelle B Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Boumouda 0.94 1069 396264.43 1397262.21 2009 Boumouda Site 1 Parcelle C Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Boumouda 0.59 1037 396623.82 1396937.48 2009 Boumouda Site 2 Parcelle A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Boumouda 0.63 920 397676.08 1396547.21 2009 Boumouda Site 2 Parcelle B Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Boumouda 0.82 888 398071.05 1396487.64 2009 Boumouda Site 2 Parcelle C Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Boumouda 1.67 1293 398464.51 1396267.74 2009 Boumouda Site 3 Parcelle A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Boumouda 0.95 1625 400033.99 1394211.48 2009 Boumouda Site 3 Parcelle B Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Boumouda 0.74 1004 399640.41 1394694.49 2009 Dakabanta Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Dakabanta 0.53 561 419854.87 1395480.89 2009 Dakabanta Site 1 Parcelle B Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Dakabanta 1.05 1151 419437.99 1395602.62 2009 Diagnon Site 1 Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Diagnoding 0.95 2256 394777.38 1393590.21 2009 Djiredji Site 1 Parcelle B Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Djiredji 0.66 1156 417145.77 1394931.29 2009 Djiredji Site 2 Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Djiredji 0.72 1539 415842.47 1394812.12 2009 Kinteigrou Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Kinteigrou 0.73 437 421425.04 1394166.45 2009 Manecoundas Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Manecoundas 0.77 495 419174.09 1395553.78 2009 Manecoundas Site 1 Parcelle B Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Manecoundas 1.01 922 418944.64 1395499.38 2009 Nguindir Site 1 Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Nguindir 0.81 474 423649.06 1394173.26 2009 Soucoutoto Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Soucoutoto 2.26 2870 414060.59 1394295.16 2009 Tintinkong Site 1 Parcelle A Sedhiou Sedhiou Djiredji Djiredji Tintinkong 0.60 759 415012.73 1394893.11 2009 Birkamanding Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Diouloulou Diouloulou Birkamanding 2.41 1073 325098.99 1439889.64 2009 Birkamanding Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Diouloulou Diouloulou Birkamanding 3.02 1024 325381.87 1440265.1 2009 Birkamanding Site 3 Ziguinchor Bignona Diouloulou Diouloulou Birkamanding 4.80 1122 325229.15 1440054.89 2009 Diouloulou Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Diouloulou Diouloulou Diouloulou 4.29 923 326908.99 1442126.1 2009 Diouloulou Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Diouloulou Diouloulou Diouloulou 1.46 780 326990.76 1442352.63 2009 Niomoune Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Diouloulou Kafountine Niomoune 2.17 1145 318805.9 1397885.27 2009 Niomoune Site 3 Ziguinchor Bignona Diouloulou Kafountine Niomoune 0.79 777 320699.16 1397770.94 2009 59/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Djinone Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Baila Djinone 1.93 2205 350651.34 1436964.94 2009 Djinone Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Baila Djinone 1.74 2076 350480.4 1437217.24 2009 Diounoung Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Diounoung 0.89 2132 351690.78 1427273.12 2009 Diounoung Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Diounoung 5.04 5007 351530.65 1427149.26 2009 Diounoung Site 3 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Diounoung 2.27 2161 351931.98 1428127.14 2009 Diounoung Site 4 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Diounoung 1.17 1025 351869.76 1428628.37 2009 Diounoung Site 5 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Diounoung 0.97 657 351801.52 1428726.54 2009 Diounoung Site 6 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Diounoung 0.52 751 351938.1 1428715.21 2009 Diounoung Site 7 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Diounoung 2.60 2151 352581.67 1429115.89 2009 Diounoung Site 8 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Diounoung 0.74 1700 352313.69 1429298.13 2009 Diounoung Site 9 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Diounoung 1.15 2726 351456.09 1429354.11 2009 Diounoung Site 10 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Diounoung 2.25 1815 350548.65 1429506.21 2009 Diounoung Site 12 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Diounoung 1.06 1433 350355.63 1429805.08 2009 Diounoung Site 11 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Diounoung 5.62 5798 351564.06 1429460.11 2009 Djinaki Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Djinaki 0.84 1002 340254.74 1429136.15 2009 Djinaki Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Djinaki 1.54 536 340263.41 1429181.69 2009 Djinaki Site 3 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Djinaki 2.50 1753 340304.68 1429421.88 2009 Djinaki Site 4 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Djinaki 0.57 344 340137.44 1429217.45 2009 Djinaki Site 5 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Djinaki 1.30 594 340191.25 1429453.58 2009 Ebinkine Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Ebinkine 1.41 819 336807.52 1428363.12 2009 Ebinkine Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Ebinkine 2.60 1150 336895.09 1428113.72 2009 Ebinkine Site 4 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Ebinkine 0.51 449 336550.94 1428435.64 2009 Koussabel Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Koussabel 1.86 839 352363.14 1434410.57 2009 Koussabel Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Djinaki Koussabel 0.97 695 352273.68 1434080.75 2009 Baline Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Baline 15.78 7349 340389.96 1427994.1 2009 Badiana Site 3 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Badiana 3.71 3860 344983.57 1426494.64 2009 60/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Badiana Site 5 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Badiana 0.98 2091 344933.1 1426522.68 2009 Badiana Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Badiana 3.58 5658 344264.81 1426886.45 2009 Baline Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Baline 1.89 1283 340174.02 1428416.97 2009 Baranlir Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Baranlir 1.59 1497 350901.57 1429960.4 2009 Baranlir Site 1 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Baranlir 0.67 545 350320.88 1429877.51 2009 Baranlir Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Baranlir 8.41 5460 352001.39 1431480.74 2009 Belaye Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Belaye 0.60 1618 348217.85 1426321.23 2009 Belaye Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Belaye 2.57 2234 349045.33 1425837.01 2009 Belaye Site 4 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Belaye 0.73 790 347299.36 1425944.85 2009 Kabiline 1 Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Kabiline 1 2.58 937 329298.32 1433291.56 2009 Kabiline 1 Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Kabiline 1 0.95 414 329217.27 1433077.91 2009 Kabiline 1 Site 3 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Kabiline 1 2.15 846 333836.4 1430220.37 2009 Kabiline 1 Site 4 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Kabiline 1 5.64 2411 329994.09 1432519.61 2009 Kabiline 2 Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Kabiline 2 1.74 677 333698 1430404.2 2009 Kabiline 2 Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Kabiline 2 0.63 582 334945.11 1429979.24 2009 Kabiline 2 Site 4 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Kabiline 2 0.54 425 334248.37 1433671.11 2009 Kabiline 2 Site 5 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Kabiline 2 0.58 397 334205.23 1433748.34 2009 Karongue Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Karongue 4.28 990 332231.34 1435350.68 2009 Karongue Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Karongue 2.15 726 332031.56 1435646.31 2009 Karongue Site 3 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Karongue 0.81 427 332115.69 1435447.79 2009 Kataba 1 Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Kataba 1 1.94 681 327634.22 1439090.95 2009 Kataba 1 Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Kataba 1 4.24 1072 327440.59 1441092.42 2009 Kataba 1 Site 3 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Kataba 1 2.29 909 327404 1441335.03 2009 Kataba 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Kataba 2 3.13 1100 330502.87 1437757.83 2009 Kawane Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Kawane 1.34 560 331565.27 1436460.5 2009 Santhiaba Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Santhiaba 2.43 924 325470.43 1441168.59 2009 61/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Santhiaba Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Santhiaba 5.54 2072 325838.04 1441025.19 2009 Katinongue Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Djinaki Katinongue 2.08 3388 355963.5 1437411.94 2008 Katoudie Site 1 Parcelle E Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Suelle Katoudie 0.72 942 354156.09 1431024.18 2009 Katoudie Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Suelle Katoudie 0.98 745 355083.42 1430874.29 2009 Katoudie Site 3 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Suelle Katoudie 2.74 2032 353917.14 1431494.17 2009 Katoudie Site 3 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Suelle Katoudie 1.18 1049 354031.37 1431870.84 2009 Katoudie Site 4 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Suelle Katoudie 5.43 4193 353871.76 1432863.91 2009 Katoudie Site 4 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Suelle Katoudie 2.62 1725 353789.75 1431572.16 2009 Katoudie Site 4 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Suelle Katoudie 1.07 1553 353576.39 1433633.67 2009 Katoudie Site 4 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Suelle Katoudie 0.76 1171 353627.56 1430998.15 2009 Katoudie Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Kadaba 1 Suelle Katoudie 1.00 1561 354010.51 1431191.28 2009 Baila Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Baila Baila 3.28 1278 352627.67 1426393.64 2009 Diatang Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Baila Diatang 1.21 1244 355239.13 1430189.56 2009 Diatang Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Baila Diatang 2.78 2242 353345.98 1429748.54 2009 Daroukhairou Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Diouloulou Daroukhairou 0.56 691 330309.94 1443870.05 2009 Daroukhairou Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Diouloulou Daroukhairou 5.19 3609 329915.16 1443868.77 2009 Koulandiang Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Diouloulou Koulandiang 0.57 443 332287.38 1444725.63 2009 Albadar Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Albadar 18.61 4201 317319.97 1435815.86 2009 Albadar Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Albadar 2.10 725 317559.39 1435929.66 2009 Albadar Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Albadar 2.36 1006 317966.83 1435751.78 2009 Albadar Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Albadar 21.11 4218 318126.82 1435917.55 2009 Bantanklin Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Bantanklin 8.37 1980 315499.41 1431666.39 2009 Bantanklin Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Bantanklin 1.32 458 315536.71 1431395.31 2009 Colomba Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Colomba 0.93 593 319723.22 1435890.29 2009 Colomba Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Colomba 9.12 1536 319638.67 1436208.25 2009 Colomba Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Colomba 3.02 1133 320035.47 1436329.18 2009 62/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Colomba Site 1 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Colomba 2.59 769 319598.94 1436401.04 2009 Colomba Site 1 Parcelle E Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Colomba 9.27 2426 318847.68 1436431.12 2009 Coubanack Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Coubanack 5.23 1318 322300.24 1438840.54 2009 Coubanack Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Coubanack 1.49 996 321989.89 1438925.41 2009 Diana Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Diana 3.85 1667 315681.59 1434936.21 2009 Diana Site 1 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Diana 10.34 2406 316134.31 1435156.61 2009 Diana Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Diana 18.05 4478 316111.6 1430329.35 2009 Diana Site 1 parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Diana 1.24 765 315243.56 1434889.82 2009 Djindembe Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Djindembe 6.03 1248 316723.75 1435306.51 2009 Djindembe Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Djindembe 5.34 2212 317476.44 1434943.46 2009 Kabadio Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Kabadio 0.79 548 311215.99 1444305.48 2009 Kabadio Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Kabadio 2.13 1371 311235.89 1443918.99 2009 Kabar Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Kabar 26.92 3199 315573.14 1430850.11 2009 Kafountine Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Kafountine 8.52 1839 313991.91 1429259.52 2009 Kafountine Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Kafountine 8.83 1986 314373.35 1429293.18 2009 Kafountine Site 3 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Kafountine 6.57 1665 314771.97 1429217.2 2009 Kafountine Site 4 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Kafountine 6.29 1384 314963.36 1429522.8 2009 Kafountine Site 5 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Kafountine 2.14 641 314634.55 1429123.64 2009 Kafountine Site 6 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Kafountine 3.04 1121 315043.08 1429297.35 2009 Kouba Site 6 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Kouba 1.47 485 323565.83 1412976.78 2009 Kouba Site 4 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Kouba 0.61 874 320625.41 1415812.64 2009 Kouba Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Kouba 1.37 1541 321138.6 1415913.45 2009 Nafacounda Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Nafacounda 13.74 2420 314348.23 1428820.62 2009 Nafacounda Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Nafacounda 16.34 2912 313838.15 1428950.39 2009 Nafacounda Site 3 Ziguinchor Bignona Kataba 1 Kafountine Nafacounda 1.55 626 313320.05 1429046.46 2009 Oulampane Ziguinchor Bignona Sindian Oulampane Oulampane 0.54 1200 395247.7 1433305.86 2008 63/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Boulandor Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Boulandor 0.70 1258 388557.05 1409098.99 2008 Boulandor Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Boulandor 0.69 1530 388843.78 1409038.67 2008 Coubalan Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubalan 3.00 1222 373917.15 1398633.14 2009 Coubalan Site 4 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubalan 1.25 747 373170 1398729.24 2009 Coubalan Site 4 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubalan 2.53 1476 373400.94 1398534.44 2009 Coubalan Site 4 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubalan 3.21 1366 373636.63 1398610.96 2009 Coubalan Site 5 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubalan 3.01 1623 372941.51 1398723.16 2009 Coubalan Site 8 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubalan 8.62 3019 373961.34 1399987.69 2009 Coubalan Site 9 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubalan 3.08 1288 373843.01 1400374.96 2009 Coubalan Site 4 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubalan 1.14 803 373383.35 1398769.33 2008 Coubalan Site 5 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubalan 3.39 1816 373713.88 1398744.95 2008 Coubalan Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubalan 0.51 376 373297.4 1398741.8 2008 Coubalan Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubalan 0.68 899 373277.52 1398885.7 2009 Coubalan Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubalan 6.03 3176 374339.27 1399184.09 2009 Coubanao Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubanao 1.46 1159 381664.53 1398716.93 2008 Coubanao Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Coubanao 1.02 1458 383496.79 1399676.72 2008 Diobour Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Dioubour 0.56 390 374572.64 1400464.41 2009 Diobour Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Dioubour 0.64 492 374625.19 1400071.95 2009 Dioubour Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Dioubour 3.24 1899 374424.06 1398991.98 2008 Diounoungue Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Diounoungue 1.14 1029 355926.28 1437631.96 2008 Djilacounde Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Djilacoune 1.69 709 368648.74 1398838.85 2008 Djilacounde Site 3 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Djilacoune 2.79 1948 368172.45 1399005.11 2008 Djilacounde Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Djilacoune 0.63 604 368339.06 1398790.5 2008 Fintiock Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Fintiock 0.88 1084 380097.13 1398813.32 2009 Finthiock Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Fintiock 0.68 588 380277.54 1399023.89 2008 Gnandane Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Gnandane 1.59 607 376305.62 1398948.35 2008 64/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Hathioune Site 4 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Coubalan Hathioune 1.74 1622 384385.85 1399574.54 2008 Baghagha Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Baghagha 8.68 2651 358475.59 1402242.37 2009 Baghagha Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Baghagha 1.32 854 358471.86 1401996.36 2009 Baghagha Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Baghagha 1.68 840 358160.38 1402329.34 2009 Baghagha Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Baghagha 5.41 2003 358662.05 1401836.9 2008 Diagobel Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Diagobel 2.05 1842 355149.38 1403585.82 2009 Diagobel Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Diagobel 1.38 957 355051.22 1403135.72 2009 Tobor Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 1.55 676 365073.78 1399729.26 2009 Tobor Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 3.47 1025 364821.69 1399589.3 2009 Tobor Site 3 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 13.09 4912 365799.71 1399458.16 2009 Tobor Site 4 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 3.55 1996 364153.65 1399481.31 2009 Tobor Site 5 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 1.18 587 361084.64 1395887.61 2009 Tobor Site 5 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 2.33 994 361115.63 1396146.03 2009 Tobor Site 6 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 6.11 4315 362062.94 1397316.94 2009 Tobor Site 7 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 2.47 1229 360866.29 1395263.59 2009 Tobor Site 7 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 1.16 496 360953.05 1395133.05 2009 Tobor Site 8 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 6.22 1946 360935.86 1396795.53 2009 Tobor Site 10 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 5.29 2637 363004.67 1399456.17 2009 Tobor Site 11 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 8.34 3282 366742.02 1399017.05 2009 Tobor Site 11 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 4.08 1752 367115.88 1399059.23 2009 Tobor Site 12 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 1.98 1289 361179.04 1394944.81 2009 Tobor Site 4 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 2.18 708 361135.86 1395291.48 2008 Tobor Site 4 Parcelle E Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 0.59 356 361766.06 1398119.1 2008 Tobor Boutoumol Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 5.56 1578 366397.28 1399192.51 2008 Tobor Site 6 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 1.98 1150 362529.95 1399043.58 2008 Tobor Site 6 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 7.28 2180 362849.69 1398999.48 2008 65/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Tobor Site 4 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 6.49 1749 360867.01 1395487.07 2008 Tobor Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 11.02 2605 367132.47 1398738.95 2009 Tobor Site 4 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Niamone Tobor 0.77 1088 361557.13 1397580.82 2008 Mampalago Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Oulampane Mampalago 0.93 1784 392373.71 1428681.65 2008 Dieba Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Ouonck Dieba 1.07 553 389206.29 1420463.36 2008 Djilongueya Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Ouonck Djilongueya 0.98 472 393821.1 1422342.63 2008 Kaguitte Site 4 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Ouonck Kaguitte 0.96 1134 346028.06 1370671.08 2009 Kaguitte Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Ouonck Kaguitte 3.06 3093 345467.72 1370264.17 2009 Kaguitte Site 4 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Ouonck Kaguitte 2.70 1627 346374.09 1370731.61 2009 Ouonck Site 5 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Ouonck Ouonck 1.38 5144 386961.58 1403946.75 2008 Santak Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Tanghori Ouonck Santak 0.84 3158 388339.44 1411222.46 2008 Dianki Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Diegoune Dianki 6.09 2674 340851.49 1423456.82 2009 Diegoune Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Diegoune Diegoune 2.77 1712 350309.49 1421793.1 2009 Diegoune Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Diegoune Diegoune 1.15 1153 350295.68 1421232.69 2009 Diegoune Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Diegoune Diegoune 1.04 928 351241.74 1420639.93 2009 Diegoune Site 1 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Diegoune Diegoune 3.46 3064 350246.94 1420716.49 2009 Diegoune Site 1 Parcelle E Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Diegoune Diegoune 0.90 736 350108.18 1421089.07 2009 Kagnobon Kadjiguene Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Diegoune Kagnobon 8.17 3147 348339.09 1422468.6 2009 Kagnobon Oupeute Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Diegoune Kagnobon 2.35 1320 346667.83 1422233.5 2009 Kagnobon Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Diegoune Kagnobon 3.49 1905 345092.22 1420745.26 2009 Kagnobon Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Diegoune Kagnobon 2.17 1646 348309.98 1422902.59 2009 Kagnobon Site 3 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Diegoune Kagnobon 1.26 1035 345544.18 1421633.03 2009 Kagnobon Site 3 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Diegoune Kagnobon 3.92 2339 345758.86 1422086.51 2009 Kagnobon Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Diegoune Kagnobon 1.83 1616 348194.1 1422429.18 2009 Thiobon Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 2.33 1106 330230.85 1423398.69 2009 Thiobon Site 7 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 0.95 853 329798.09 1423297.61 2009 66/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Bessire Site 2 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Bessire 0.82 988 343996.98 1424419.8 2009 Bessire Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Bessire 3.96 1274 344606.66 1422943.11 2009 Bessire Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Bessire 8.22 2184 345033.67 1422231.6 2009 Bessire Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Bessire 4.10 2817 343994.1 1423852.05 2009 Bessire Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Bessire 0.87 883 343722.25 1424138.1 2009 Bessire Site 3 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Bessire 1.00 716 343484.11 1424091.72 2009 Bessire Site 3 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Bessire 0.74 429 343579.49 1424062.01 2009 Kartiack Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Kartiack 0.61 425 337008.31 1426017.96 2009 Kartiack Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Kartiack 5.30 1620 337105.22 1426016.57 2009 Kartiack Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Kartiack 3.01 1339 337414.8 1425481.09 2009 Kartiack Site 1 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Kartiack 1.81 870 337228.5 1423645.59 2009 Kartiack Site 1 Parcelle E Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Kartiack 5.05 1059 337361 1423917.35 2009 Kartiack Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Kartiack 3.99 2122 335244.49 1422941.46 2009 Kartiack Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Kartiack 1.91 605 335524.89 1422580.79 2009 Thiobon Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 10.30 3706 330838.7 1424888.66 2009 Thiobon Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 9.36 3630 332037.14 1425104.37 2009 Thiobon Site 2 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 1.26 588 330159.62 1423068.72 2009 Thiobon Kafone Site 4 Par A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 1.36 779 330634.88 1422198.34 2009 Thiobon Kafone Site 4 Par B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 1.13 605 330652.74 1422364.23 2009 Thiobon Kafone Site 4 Par C Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 0.77 416 330757.9 1421748.19 2009 Thiobon Dable Site 5 Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 5.89 2417 331714.39 1425339.7 2009 Thiobon Dable Site 6 Par A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 1.43 650 332778.2 1424824.7 2009 Thiobon Dable Site 6 Par B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 1.99 793 332788.82 1424983.39 2009 Thiobon Site 7 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 3.62 1591 329709.48 1423622.36 2009 Thiobon Erindiane Site 8 Par A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 0.91 1013 331273.3 1420973.56 2009

67/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Thiobon Erindiane Site 8 Par B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 1.62 1013 330888.46 1420866.83 2009 Thiobon Erindiane Site 8 Par C Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 0.60 503 331590.85 1421022.7 2009 Thiobon Erindiane Site 9 Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 2.45 981 330727.18 1420681.17 2009 Thiobon Site 11 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 6.86 1610 330285.95 1424667.28 2009 Thiobon Site 11 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 15.22 4231 330529.39 1425007.6 2009 Thiobon Site 11 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 10.62 2561 330828.39 1425360.09 2009 Thiobon Kabine Site 12 Par B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Kartiack Thiobon 0.60 731 331299.45 1425047.22 2009 Afiniam Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Afiniam 0.55 649 350748.35 1398050.94 2009 Afiniam Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Afiniam 0.74 1349 350739.76 1398046.06 2009 Afiniam Site 2 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Afiniam 0.91 621 350347.12 1397928.48 2009 Afiniam Site 2 Parcelle F Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Afiniam 3.01 1273 350111.5 1397491.89 2009 Afiniam Site 2 Parcelle G Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Afiniam 1.72 1668 350010.92 1397274.61 2009 Afiniam Site 1 Parcelle E Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Afiniam 9.37 2951 349636.19 1397464.22 2009 Afiniam Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Afiniam 0.64 825 350958.08 1397994.19 2009 Afiniam Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Afiniam 2.39 2483 350326.76 1397976.72 2009 Afiniam Site 2 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Afiniam 1.14 753 350262.06 1397696.83 2009 Bode Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Bodé 2.96 1219 345071.69 1398334.46 2009 Bode Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Bodé 2.92 1029 344895.67 1398133.28 2009 Bouteume Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Bouteume 4.27 1095 349237.33 1397510.43 2009 Bouteume Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Bouteume 2.27 1150 349214.06 1397312.57 2009 Mlomp Baloquir Site 1 Par A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 2.55 1145 332014.39 1419202.71 2009 Mlomp Baloquir Site 1 Par B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 3.01 1043 331475.61 1419338.66 2009 Mlomp Baloquir Site 2 Par A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 1.19 935 332286.56 1418874.61 2009 Mlomp Baloquir Site 2 Par B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 1.76 887 331755.44 1418613.84 2009 Mlomp Baloquir Site 2 Par C Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 7.51 2220 331491.09 1419025.65 2009 Mlomp Baloquir Site 4 Par A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 4.30 1655 332846.47 1418941.11 2009 68/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Mlomp Baloquir Site 4 Par C Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 1.37 786 332585.8 1418813.66 2009 Mlomp Baloquir Site 4 Par D Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 0.72 531 332203.03 1419103.45 2009 Mlomp Etamaya Site 6 Par B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 3.20 1810 331418.15 1418407.94 2009 Mlomp Boundia Site 11 Par A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 1.43 739 332371.08 1417150.54 2009 Mlomp Boundia Site 11 Par B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 2.38 752 332538.33 1417187.08 2009 Mlomp Boundia Site 11 Par C Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 6.87 2523 332170.84 1416939.39 2009 Mlomp Boundia Site 11 Par D Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 2.71 1678 332542.54 1417569.06 2009 Mlomp Etamaya Site 9 Par A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 11.40 3505 331881.58 1417681.01 2009 Mlomp Etamaya Site 7 Par A Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 3.99 2496 332665.57 1417670.44 2009 Mlomp Baloquir Site 3 Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mlomp Mlomp 28.14 11402 331180.33 1419212.23 2009 Thionck Niaganane S1C Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Thionck Essyl Thionck Essyl 17.10 7912 336005.96 1411354.58 2009 Thionck Batine Ba Site 1 Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Thionck Essyl Thionck Essyl 7.30 2792 334770.66 1412237.81 2009 Thionck Niaganane Site 1 Par B Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Thionck Essyl Thionck Essyl 3.14 1013 335809.96 1411995.69 2009 Thionck Niaganane Site 1 Par D Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Thionck Essyl Thionck Essyl 0.52 446 336735.29 1411110.23 2009 Thionck Niaganane Site 2 Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Thionck Essyl Thionck Essyl 2.15 1251 336774.35 1410954.32 2009 Kayite Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Kabrousse 1.66 1612 316070.49 1371139.29 2009 Boucotte Diola Site 2 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Boucotte Diola 6.25 2820 309917.25 1374381.94 2009 Bouyouye Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Bouyouye 0.85 715 307714.92 1376224.14 2009 Bouyouye Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Bouyouye 1.34 752 307848.38 1376280.93 2009 Bouyouye Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Bouyouye 1.42 582 307749.59 1376351.26 2009 Cachouane Site 1 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Cachouane 2.01 1284 314919.42 1382502.6 2009 Cachouane Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Cachouane 2.13 1542 313200.91 1383202.14 2009 Cachouane Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Cachouane 1.47 1319 312743.18 1383158.19 2009 Cap Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Cap Skiring 11.13 2805 312508.93 1369471.72 2009 Cap Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Cap Skiring 9.73 3562 312218.97 1369348.56 2009 69/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Cap Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Cap Skiring 5.43 1578 311571.05 1369935.81 2009 Cap Site 1 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Cap Skiring 2.34 1008 311387.41 1370221.64 2009 Cap Virage Site 1 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Cap Skiring 6.34 2717 315436.13 1370703.62 2009 Carabane Site 2 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Carabane 0.81 500 316426.35 1383961.23 2009 Carabane Site 2 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Carabane 0.84 769 316578.6 1384073.22 2009 Carabane Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Carabane 2.61 1053 315978.12 1384220.75 2009 Carabane Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Carabane 0.79 628 316315.4 1383974.14 2009 Katakalousse Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Kabrousse 1.60 2266 317935.65 1374181.64 2009 Katakalousse Site 2 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Kabrousse 3.04 2750 317198.98 1373870.26 2009 Katakalousse Site 2 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Kabrousse 4.12 1396 316668.46 1372970.88 2009 Katakalousse Site 2 Parcelle E Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Kabrousse 1.27 732 316522.7 1372461.62 2009 Katakalousse Site 5 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Kabrousse 1.98 929 316004.42 1371392.08 2009 Kayite Site 1 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Kabrousse 4.19 1406 315911.1 1371153.4 2009 Kayite Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Kabrousse 1.27 1373 316323.86 1371894.83 2009 Kayite Site 3 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Kabrousse 2.69 777 316090.05 1371633.5 2009 Kayite Site 3 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Kabrousse 1.02 860 315968.2 1371714.84 2009 Kayite Site 4 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Kabrousse 1.17 778 316280.4 1372066.19 2009 Kayite Site 5 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Kabrousse 2.64 1444 316478.57 1372869.1 2009 Ourong Site 1 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Ourong 0.55 451 318116.15 1374528.51 2009 Ourong Site 4 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Ourong 1.13 1288 319599.43 1378407.74 2009 Ourong Site 5 parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Ourong 0.60 1274 319559.64 1377917.48 2009 Ourong Site 3 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Ourong 2.11 1392 319355.89 1378783.17 2009 Ourong Site 6 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Ourong 1.05 1041 319202.8 1375092.66 2009 Sifoka Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Sifoka 4.04 1638 316570.34 1382037.09 2009 Sifoka Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Sifoka 0.70 827 317149.42 1381794.15 2009 Sifoka Site 3 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Sifoka 4.12 1650 317265.8 1381484.52 2009 70/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Sifoka Site 3 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Diembering Sifoka 6.41 2524 316732.17 1381470.54 2009 Cap Skiring Site 1 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Oukout Cap Skiring 1.42 954 311319.81 1370570.12 2008 Cap Skiring Site 4 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Oukout Cap Skiring 1.73 709 311552.9 1370708.57 2008 Cap Skiring Site 2 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Oukout Cap Skiring 4.68 1494 311534.91 1370129.61 2008 Essaout Site 1 Ziguinchor Oussouye Kabrousse Santhiaba Essaout 0.97 1197 322709.88 1372481.76 2009 Boukitingo Site 1 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Boukitingo Boukitingo 5.88 2500 325942.02 1375477.8 2009 Eloubalire Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Boukitingo Eloubalire 6.66 1988 340496.5 1381497.38 2009 Eloubalire Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Boukitingo Eloubalire 2.67 1322 339075.17 1382116.05 2009 Eloubalire Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Boukitingo Eloubalire 1.07 643 339036.92 1381481 2009 Eloubalir Site 3 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Boukitingo Eloubalire 0.84 457 339806.41 1381953.79 2009 Djiromait Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Djiromait 1.31 1393 334256.87 1387623.8 2009 Effissao Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Effissao 2.97 1368 324663.56 1384477.21 2009 Mlomp Houssel Site 1 Par C Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjifolong 0.62 793 327484.85 1391382.4 2009 Mlomp Houssel Site 1 Par A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjifolong 1.05 858 327218.37 1391263.76 2009 Mlomp Houssel Site 4 Par B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjifolong 1.15 1241 327931.79 1391464.4 2009 Mlomp Houssel Site 2 Par A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjifolong 0.98 1395 327780.72 1391743.83 2009 Mlomp Houssel Site 3 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjifolong 1.65 1827 327720.94 1391805.25 2009 Mlomp Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjifolong 0.79 835 326390.61 1390635.06 2009 Mlomp Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjifolong 1.32 1201 326495.15 1390931.35 2009 Mlomp Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjifolong 1.62 1406 326447.74 1391137.84 2009 Mlomp Site 3 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjifolong 2.01 2021 326343.69 1390840.75 2009 Mlomp Housell Site 4 Par A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjifolong 1.64 1231 327747.38 1391419.32 2009 Kafone Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjinol 19.19 5933 332389.59 1387719.63 2009 Kafone Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjinol 17.50 4692 332134.89 1387483.2 2009 Kafone Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjinol 2.75 1614 332302.79 1386792.02 2009 Kafone Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjinol 2.43 1762 332801.71 1387333.33 2009 71/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Kafone Site 1 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Kadjinol 2.73 2039 331901.74 1386733.81 2009 Loudia Wolof Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Loudia Wolof 0.94 463 325808.13 1383147.34 2009 Loudia Wolof Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Loudia Wolof 0.58 443 325773.28 1383066.39 2009 Loudia Wolof Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Loudia Wolof 2.42 752 325664.8 1382923.17 2009 Loudia Wolof Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Loudia Wolof 1.81 637 325630.69 1382662.85 2009 Loudia Wolof Site 2 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Loudia Wolof 2.86 1503 325617.98 1382375.92 2009 Loudia Wolof Site 3 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Loudia Wolof 3.58 1463 325645.35 1384483.96 2009 Loudia Wolof Site 3 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Loudia Wolof 0.79 596 325375.76 1384303.33 2009 Loudia Wolof Site 3 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Loudia Wolof 0.57 465 325507.38 1384200.68 2009 Loudia Wolof Site 5 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Loudia Wolof 4.50 1611 325324.75 1383563.1 2009 Loudia Wolof Site 6 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Loudia Wolof 1.04 567 325319.04 1383095.73 2009 Loudia Wolof Site 6 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Loudia Wolof 1.16 843 325467.26 1383264.11 2009 Loudia Wolof Site 7 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Loudia Wolof 1.29 1427 325333.66 1384068.63 2009 Pointe St Georges Site 1 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Pointe St Georges 0.50 587 331873.57 1395711.15 2009 Santhiaba Wolof Site 2 Par B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Santhiaba Wolof 0.66 592 322015.91 1384282.45 2009 Santhiaba Wolof Site 3 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Santhiaba Wolof 3.68 1789 322322.83 1384108.14 2009 Santhiaba wolof Site 4 Par A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Mlomp Santhiaba Wolof 1.60 1127 321970.48 1384003.9 2009 Carounate Site 1 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Carounate 0.84 625 335141.64 1379135.77 2008 Carounate Site 2 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Carounate 2.29 873 335438.66 1379531.71 2008 Carounate Site 3 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Carounate 3.25 989 335499.73 1379428.17 2008 Diakene Wolof Site 3 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Diakene Wolof 0.75 872 322625.14 1378253.63 2009 Diantene Site 1 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Diantene 1.15 795 323442.07 1378496.61 2009 Diantene Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Diantene 0.54 488 323406.93 1378554.04 2009 Diantene Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Diantene 3.54 1599 323464.71 1378687.06 2009 Diantene Site 2 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Diantene 0.94 1114 323715.21 1378467.2 2009 Diantene Site 3 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Diantene 1.10 702 323496.16 1379460.78 2009 72/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Diantene Site 3 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Diantene 1.98 925 323395.9 1379452.94 2009 Diantene Site 3 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Diantene 1.28 1711 323347.63 1379160.6 2009 Niambalang Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Niambalang 4.55 1373 337889.23 1377123.81 2009 Niambalang Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Niambalang 4.01 1028 337825.89 1377325.85 2009 Niambalang Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Niambalang 1.66 955 337518.44 1377132.72 2009 Niambalang Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Niambalang 1.20 847 337483.97 1376812.48 2009 Niambalang Site 3 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Niambalang 9.28 3969 336727.25 1377649.6 2009 Niambalang Site 3 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Niambalang 1.40 862 336530.08 1377342.73 2009 Niambalang Site 3 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Niambalang 0.72 736 337570.02 1377324.58 2008 Niambalang Site 4 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Niambalang 1.25 1227 337697.36 1377380.6 2008 Niambalang Site 5 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Niambalang 1.48 757 337602.24 1377115.88 2008 Niambalang Site 6 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Niambalang 1.80 1008 336580.43 1377216.93 2008 Niambalang Site 9 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Niambalang 0.80 543 336763.41 1377234.13 2008 Niambalang Site 8 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Niambalang 0.70 527 336389.47 1377027.05 2008 Senghalene Site 1 Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Senghalene 0.79 864 332927.72 1383976.61 2009 Siganar Site 5 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Siganar 2.14 1043 333658.54 1376125.31 2009 Siganar Site 5 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Siganar 0.96 592 333816.28 1376032.78 2009 Siganar Site 5 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Siganar 0.91 1169 333276.43 1375909.33 2009 Siganar Site 6 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Siganar 1.48 628 333476.35 1375935.97 2009 Siganar Site 6 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Loudia Wolof Oukout Siganar 0.92 726 333549.28 1376174.1 2009 Bacounoum Site 1 Ziguinchor Oussouye Nyassia Nyassia Bacounoum 0.57 722 345130.71 1375506.64 2009 Bacounoum Site 2 Ziguinchor Oussouye Nyassia Nyassia Bacounoum 1.26 700 345089.53 1374837.33 2009 Bacounoum Site 3 Ziguinchor Oussouye Nyassia Nyassia Bacounoum 1.89 1706 345520.55 1374680.21 2009 Bacounoum Site 4 Ziguinchor Oussouye Nyassia Nyassia Bacounoum 1.65 1100 345574.59 1374425.66 2009 Kassoulou Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Nyassia Nyassia Kassoulou 0.74 680 352997.63 1379938.18 2009 Kassoulou Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Oussouye Nyassia Nyassia Kassoulou 3.78 1653 352980.01 1380120.22 2009 73/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Nyassia Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Nyassia Nyassia Nyassia 0.72 443 350786.04 1380105.19 2008 Nyassia Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Oussouye Nyassia Nyassia Nyassia 0.63 498 350655.26 1380199.55 2008 Agnack Site 1 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Agnack 1.00 1398 378938.23 1392556.4 2009 Baghagha Site 1 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Baghagha 1.21 1027 386989.75 1395380.54 2009 Diagobel Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Diagnon 6.99 1827 354873.39 1403263.32 2008 Diagobel Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Diagnon 0.83 540 354696.8 1403341.01 2008 Niaguis Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Niaguiss 2.36 877 370070.66 1390256.9 2009 Sindone Site 3 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Sindone 1.95 1095 381117.37 1392636.16 2009 Sindone Site 3 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Sindone 0.65 635 381791.31 1392604.37 2009 Sindone Site 4 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Sindone 1.81 905 381020.46 1392333.13 2009 Sindone Site 5 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Sindone 0.75 542 381562.09 1391382.11 2009 Sindone Site 1 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Sindone 1.06 817 381372.87 1392735.87 2008 Sindone Site 3 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Sindone 2.78 2970 382155.1 1392058.77 2008 Sindone Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Sindone 0.64 1276 381837.8 1391724.47 2009 Sindone Site 3 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Sindone 0.64 1228 382027.02 1392471.37 2008 Tambacoumba Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Tambacoumba 0.52 1446 393290.22 1396058.27 2009 Boutoupa Boulom Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Camaracounda Boulom 1.93 1564 370054.23 1386195.21 2009 Boutoupa Mawa Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Camarakounda Mawa 1.94 3336 383439.24 1385327.7 2009 Boutoupa Mawa Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Camarakounda Mawa 0.82 1533 383310.69 1385426.08 2009 Boutoupa Mawa Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Camarakounda Mawa 1.19 1470 383683.02 1385313.88 2009 Boutoupa Mawa Site 2 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Camarakounda Mawa 0.58 1314 382336.92 1386657.91 2009 Ziguinchor Site 1 Parcelle E Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Ziguinchor 5.36 1864 357504.54 1390500.22 2009 Ziguinchor Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Ziguinchor 1.24 1131 357697.37 1390255.15 2009

74/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Bambadinka Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Bambadinka 2.90 1381 370416.02 1384411.93 2009 Bambadinka Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Bambadinka 9.53 2519 370649.72 1384571.7 2009 Barkabounawe Site 1 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Barkabounawe 10.47 4460 370957.32 1382475.86 2009 Djibelor Site 1 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Djibelor 10.39 3859 356110.87 1388853.51 2009 Singuere Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Singuere 2.14 4737 396127.49 1386751.98 2009 Singuere Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Singuere 0.79 1561 396559.07 1385948.17 2009 Soucouta Site 1 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Soucouta 5.77 3630 370332.54 1385043.82 2009 Ziguinchor Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Ziguinchor 0.71 385 357559.35 1390284.12 2009 Ziguinchor Site 1 Parcelle H Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Ziguinchor 0.71 611 357249.87 1390791.81 2009 Ziguinchor Site 1 Parcelle I Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Ziguinchor 0.62 575 357248.4 1390857.49 2009 Ziguinchor Site 2 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Ziguinchor 2.37 1248 357432.58 1390970.1 2009 Ziguinchor Site 3 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Ziguinchor 4.38 925 357464.56 1391168.58 2009 Ziguinchor Site 5 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Niaguiss Ziguinchor 1.91 929 358927.73 1391345.6 2009 Badiate Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Badiate 0.82 695 348228.93 1385658.31 2009 Badiate Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Badiate 14.31 7679 347859.32 1385583.97 2009 Badiate Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Badiate 1.90 972 347670.09 1385931.08 2009 Badiate Site 1 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Badiate 0.93 509 347902.11 1385445.02 2009 Badiate Site 1 Parcelle G Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Badiate 0.88 873 347493.68 1385233.53 2009 Badiate Site 1 Parcelle E Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Badiate 0.83 1052 347684.65 1385369 2009 Bandial Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Bandial 3.44 2046 337665.44 1391429.45 2009 Bandial Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Bandial 3.14 2430 338403.47 1391329.22 2009 Bandial Site 2 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Bandial 3.55 2604 337973.73 1390894.32 2009 Bandial Site 3 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Bandial 4.62 2170 338108.71 1391422.41 2009 Bandial Site 4 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Bandial 1.17 1191 338023.64 1389448.7 2009 Bandial Site 4 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Bandial 1.64 1258 338311.02 1389321.59 2009 Bandial Site 5 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Bandial 2.93 1523 341301.29 1391367.52 2009 75/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Bandial Site 6 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Bandial 0.87 740 340762.69 1390983.96 2009 Batighere Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Batighere 4.09 2025 347768.04 1388268.88 2009 Batighere Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Batighere 0.76 391 348495.63 1388563.35 2009 Batighere Site 2 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Batighere 1.24 1078 347452.86 1388268.62 2009 Batighere 2 Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Batighere 2.28 627 338600.85 1383480.3 2009 Batighere 2 Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Batighere 2.15 782 338303.14 1383097.98 2009 Djibonker Site 4 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Djibonker 0.88 492 353835.68 1383895.14 2008 Djibonker Site 1 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Djibonker 0.94 549 353721.37 1383923.08 2008 Djibonker Site 2 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Djibonker 4.81 1543 353522.39 1383858.21 2008 Djibonker Site 4 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Djibonker 1.20 1237 353957.83 1383935.47 2008 Etama Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Etama 0.71 398 339877.17 1388360.22 2009 Etama Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Etama 2.02 1152 339665.74 1388229.86 2009 Etama Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Etama 1.68 1646 339300.25 1388561.22 2009 Seleki Site 1 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Seleki 2.38 1203 341816.99 1385679.19 2009 Seleki Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Seleki 1.22 644 341605.51 1385389 2009 Seleki Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Seleki 1.73 878 341667.71 1385250.09 2009 Seleki Site 2 Parcelle F Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Seleki 0.68 702 341625.14 1385510.01 2009 Seleki Site 3 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Seleki 0.56 363 341586.02 1385622.79 2009 Seleki Site 2 Parcelle D Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Enampore Seleki 0.91 776 341490.72 1385104.86 2009 Bafican Site 1 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Bafican 3.44 1845 348695.94 1378806.82 2009 Bafican Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Bafican 2.51 1001 348708.71 1379763.67 2009 Bafican Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Bafican 2.87 1531 348942.84 1380109.12 2009 Bafican Site 4 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Bafican 3.44 1845 348695.94 1378806.91 2008 Darsalam Site 3 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Darsalam 1.98 1147 352970.32 1382837.17 2008 Darsalam Site 4 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Darsalam 1.93 876 353214.64 1382619.03 2008 Darsalam Site 1 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Darsalam 0.59 514 353449.21 1383007.23 2008 76/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Rural Perimeter Centroid Centroid Plantation Site Name Region Department Arrondissement community Village Area (ha) (m) UTM X UTM Y year Dialang Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Dialang 2.69 1261 345679.99 1379268.44 2009 Dialang Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Dialang 0.83 575 345572.29 1379211.74 2009 Dialang Site 2 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Dialang 3.03 1946 346359.27 1379316.91 2008 Dioher Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Dioher 0.60 406 344290.96 1379175.55 2009 Dioher Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Dioher 0.96 675 344512.56 1379119.42 2009 Dioher Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Dioher 3.16 2496 345131.55 1379014.2 2008 Etome Site 1 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Etome 1.83 1075 352521.36 1379999.4 2009 Etome Site 2 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Etome 1.92 1740 352260.72 1380311.34 2009 Farignabe Site 1 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Etome 1.90 3974 392895.84 1427830.71 2008 Kailou Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Kailou 1.30 1406 348907.21 1378525.72 2009 Kailou Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Kailou 3.21 2016 348978.85 1378178.46 2009 Kailou Site 1 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Kailou 2.22 1929 349045 1379317.92 2008 Kailou Site 2 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Kailou 1.49 1450 349442.26 1379775.1 2008 Kailou Site 2 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Kailou 5.05 1625 348921.64 1379735.51 2008 Kaleane Site 1 Parcelle A Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Kaleane 1.64 829 343491.98 1377421.81 2009 Kaleane Site 1 Parcelle B Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Kaleane 1.41 1401 344010.81 1377664.25 2009 Kaleane Site 1 Parcelle E Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Kaleane 2.40 1153 343695.12 1377598.68 2009 Kaleane Site 1 Parcelle C Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Nyassia Nyassia Kaleane 1.32 1163 343886.22 1377808.97 2009

77/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Annex 6 ANNEX 6: PHASES OF PROJECT´S CAMPAIGNS

Table An.6-1. Project’s campaign phases F M A M J J A S O N D J F M I. Teams recruitment and headquarter equipment Activity 1.1. : Ground mission and recruitment A1.1.1 Targeting intervention areas X X X A1.1.2 Staff recruitment X X A1.1.3 Office rental X X Activity 1.2. : Equipment A.1.2.1 Vehicle purchases X X A. 1.2.2 Office equipment purchases X A.1.2.3 Other headquarters equipment purchases X A.1.2.4 Awareness equipment purchases X Activity 1.3. : Teams training A.1.3.1 Theoretical training (Ziguinchor and Toubacouta) X A.1.3.2 Populations training X II. Awareness program Activity 2.1. : Material preparation A.2.1.1 Graphic creations (posters, t-shirt ...) X A.2.1.2 Educational formats X A.2.1.3 Printing X Activity 2.2. : Awareness campaign and identification of area managers A.2.2.1 Awareness campaign X X X A.2.2.2 Identification of area managers X X A 2.2.3 Identification of potential reforestation areas X X A.2.2.4 Targeting “propagule” collection areas X X Activity 2.3. : Training local population 2.3.1 Ground training with area managers X X Activity 2.4. : Coordination meeting A.2.4.1 Logistics X A.2.4.2 Reforesting and propagule collection provisional calendar X III. Reforestation Campaign Activity 3.1. : Propagule collection and support to the X X X X local people Activity 3.2. : Financial support to local population for X X X X the reforestation Activity 3.3. : Technical and logistic support to local X X X X populations during the reforestation Activity 3.4. : Communication X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A.3.4.1 Printing materials X X A.3.4.2 Videos and photos X X X X X A.3.4.3 Documentary film production X A.3.4.4 Book writing X X X X X X X X X X A.3.4.5 Publication of the book X X A.3.4.6 Communication with local, national and international media X X X X X X Activity 3.5. : General assemblies and participatory X analysis of the campaign

78/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

F M A M J J A S O N D J F M IV. Plantation monitoring Activity 4.1. : Monitoring protocol X Activity 4.2. : Training local population for monitoring X X campaign Activity 4.3. : Oceanium support for the monitoring X X X X X Activity 4.4. : Monitoring report X X X X X

79/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Figure An.6-1. Project’s campaign coordination The President

Project Coordinator

Casamance Sine Saloum manager manager

R Headquarter Headquarter Headquarter Movable Team Movable Team E C Kolda Bignona Toubacouta Siné P Casamance Siné Saloum F O Casamance Casamance Saloum R O L O R L P E E A S C G Areas Managers T T U A I L T O Local Population Activity Leader* E I N O Local Population N

*: village leader or group leader (women, young people…)

80/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Annex 7 ANNEX 7: SCHEDULE OF CINEMA-MEETINGS Table An.7-1. Cinema/meeting in Casamance 2008 Areas Villages Date Nº people Responsible SUEL (Event group include 10 Balandine 25/02/2008 150 Julien Badji villages of this area) Bignona & Diouloulou Djinaki 26/02/2008 200 Bacary Coly Kafountine Diannah 27/02/2008 350 Ismaël Dramé Thionck Esssyl & Affiniam Mangagoulack 28/02/2008 400 Oumar Diémé - Mamina Goudiaby Tobor & Niamone Diagobel 29/02/2008 100 Albert Seydi et Joseph Thiabo Coubalan Finthiock 01/03/2008 250 Abass Sané et Seydina Aboubacar Sané Ounck Souda 02/03/2008 350 Bourama Sow Marsassoum Marsassoum 03/03/2008 150 Fatou Doucouré et Moulaye Cissé Simbandit Balant & Goudomp Simbandit Balant 04/03/2008 350 Yacinte Mansali et Saloum Kandé Niaguis Adéane 05/03/2008 100 Mamadou Correa Oussouye & Ziguinchor Edioungou 06/03/2008 350 Kuby Diabone Cap skirring Diakène 07/03/2008 350 Malick Djiba Total 21 2.400

Table An.7-2. Cinema/meeting in Casamance 2009 Areas Villages Date Men Women Young Total Diaoba 23/05/2009 50 60 40 150 Diao Ensacounda 24/05/2009 15 25 20 60 Diao Simacounda 25/05/2009 25 40 20 85 Bemet 26/05/2009 25 20 30 75 Marsassoum Diogher 27/05/2009 70 60 70 200 Boumouda 03/08/2009 100 200 100 400 Djirédi Ba 04/08/2009 80 30 40 150 Djirédi Soucoutoto 06/08/2009 40 30 30 100 Diafar Douma 06/08/2009 200 80 120 400 Total 9 9 605 545 470 1.620 Manbigné 15/06/2009 100 50 50 200 Bonna 15/06/2009 200 50 300 550 Kantinko Diafar 16/06/2009 50 50 60 160 Djibagary 16/06/2009 25 40 50 115 Kariatte 16/06/2009 40 60 50 150 Diemdien 17/06/2009 30 56 60 146 Axe Dakar Biriou 17/06/2009 20 30 20 70 Caumbamo 17/06/2009 30 60 20 110 Aloute Diola et Aloute Mandignue 18/06/2009 20 30 50 100 Diacounda 18/06/2009 60 50 80 190 Nioroki et Yako 18/06/2009 20 50 40 110 Balankine Nord 19/06/2009 45 60 30 135 TOTAL 14 12 640 586 810 2.036 Bandjikaky 05/06/2009 120 80 150 350 Diannah 21/08/2009 50 40 40 130 Kafountine Albadare 08/08/2009 70 60 40 170 Djindemb 1 et 2 09/08/2009 80 80 40 200

81/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Areas Villages Date Men Women Young Total Colomba 22/08/2009 80 50 50 180 Colomba quartier 28/08/2009 60 40 70 170 Djindemb 1 village de Diannah 27/08/2009 60 20 30 110 Diannah Kabar 16/09/2009 53 45 35 133 Kataba 1 03/10/2009 100 80 105 285 Kafountine Niafacounda 15/09/2009 48 91 50 189 TOTAL 9 10 721 586 610 1.917 Simbanding Balante 04/07/2009 70 60 85 215 Manécounda 04/07/2009 30 40 50 120 Mandina Balante et Mandina Assaï 05/07/2009 80 80 70 230 Térembasse et Anisse 05/07/2009 60 25 40 125 Simbadi Balante Diattacounda 06/07/2009 70 70 60 200 Djimassare 06/07/2009 40 20 30 90 Thiar 06/07/2009 30 20 40 90 Amdalaye 06/07/2009 40 20 60 120 Niafor et Temento 06/07/2009 90 50 70 210 TOTAL 12 9 510 385 505 1.400 Diouloulou 21/06/2009 30 45 25 100 Baline 14/08/2009 45 31 29 105 Diouloulou Badiana 13/08/2009 75 55 80 210 Belaye 12/08/2009 25 20 25 70 Ebinkine 10/08/2009 275 125 100 500 TOTAL 5 5 450 276 259 985 Baghagha 03/06/2009 100 85 115 300 Tobor quartier Boutom 10/06/2009 25 10 25 60 Tobor 17/08/2009 200 100 200 500 Koubalan 03/07/2009 45 20 20 85 Hathioune 04/07/2009 80 16 70 166 Coubanao 05/07/2009 40 15 60 115 Calounaye - Tobor Finthiock 06/07/2009 60 40 30 130 Niandane 07/07/2009 70 30 40 140 Boulindieng 08/07/2009 45 35 30 110 Djiguinoum 09/07/2009 100 40 50 190 Baghagha 23/09/2009 300 250 400 950 Djilacoune 10/07/2009 15 17 21 53 TOTAL 10 12 1.080 658 1.061 2.799 Diakene Wolof 19/07/2009 100 200 100 400 Loudia Wolof 20/07/2009 50 60 40 150 Boukitingo 21/07/2009 50 80 100 230 Diakene Diola 21/07/2009 30 50 40 120 Essaout 22/07/2009 100 50 50 200 Diantem 23/07/2009 100 40 70 210 Kafong 07/08/2009 30 40 60 130 Oussouye M'Lomp Kadjifolong 08/08/2009 40 40 70 150 Haye M'Lomp 08/08/2009 35 45 65 145 Diakene Wolof 09/08/2009 35 35 65 135 Boucotte Diembering 10/09/2009 90 60 50 200 Bouyouye 11/09/2009 110 90 50 250 Cap Skiring 31/08/2009 50 30 20 100 Sifoka 26/09/2009 40 35 25 100

82/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Areas Villages Date Men Women Young Total Vendaye 24/09/2009 200 100 100 400 Emaye 09/08/2009 45 50 65 160 Kachouane 23/09/2009 80 30 40 150 Oussouye 28/09/2009 100 25 50 175 Mlomp Kadjifone 28/09/2009 150 86 79 315 Hakoute 10/08/2009 30 35 60 125 Niambalang 03/10/2009 100 50 100 250 Cap Skiring 04/08/2009 60 32 46 138 TOTAL 22 20 1.625 1.263 1.345 4.233 Thionck Essyl Niaganane 03/08/2009 80 40 0 120 Thionck Essyl Batine 04/08/2009 50 45 20 115 M'Lomp Baloguire 04/08/2009 10 54 86 150 Tendouck Boutégol 05/08/2009 20 115 65 200 Bessire 06/08/2009 50 45 15 110 Kartiack 07/08/2009 100 30 50 180 Thiobon Thiobon 18/08/2009 90 70 55 215 M'Lomp Etamaya 19/08/2009 20 70 30 120 Bouteum 25/09/2009 276 106 178 560 Bodé 26/09/2009 252 165 119 536 Thiobon Kabine et Kafone 21/08/2009 29 73 38 140 Ediamate 05/10/2009 80 30 67 177 Thiobon Amanque 20/08/2009 48 35 57 140 TOTAL 12 13 1.105 878 780 2.763 Binako Chérif 18/08/2009 70 50 60 180 Niacounda 18/08/2009 40 80 30 150 Goudomp Sina 17/08/2009 80 50 50 180 Djibanar 13/08/2009 80 70 50 200 Birkama 14/08/2009 90 90 70 250 TOTAL 6 5 360 340 260 960 Bandiale 31/08/2009 50 10 40 100 Selecky 1er quartier 01/09/2009 140 130 30 300 Bandial Essil 01/09/2009 50 20 30 100 Badiatte 01/10/2009 51 19 30 100 TOTAL 4 4 291 179 130 600 Baghagha 26/08/2009 70 56 62 188 Mangacounda 28/08/2009 73 58 61 192 Diagnon 28/08/2009 62 58 82 202 Niaguis Koudioundou 29/08/2009 39 45 30 114 Ziguinchor 30 50 40 120 Sindone 29/08/2009 42 63 75 180 TOTAL 6 6 316 330 350 996 TOTAL 109 7.703 6.026 6.580 20.309

Table An.7-3. Cinema/meeting in Sine Saloum 2009 Areas Villages Men Women Young Total Ndoffane 30 50 60 140 Sandicoly 45 60 70 175 Keur Sambel 60 56 45 161 Niombato Mbambougar Ehadj 70 60 56 186 Sangako 60 80 40 180 Diambang 40 75 50 165

83/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Areas Villages Men Women Young Total Bani 83 98 101 282 Sourou 35 30 37 102 Néma Bah 35 40 50 125 Bambougar Malick 60 50 40 150 Bambougar Massamba 60 50 55 165 Médina 60 70 80 210 Missira 60 70 45 175 Bossin Kang 140 100 200 440 Bettenti 170 120 230 520 Bangaler 70 50 60 180 Limane 50 40 30 120 Dassilamé Sérère 45 50 60 155 Total 18 1173 1.149 1.309 3.631 Yerwago 70 95 39 204 Keur Mbar 15 30 35 80 Mbellane 45 109 112 266 Félane 80 155 226 461 Fimla Sadioga 140 260 185 585 Ndorong 78 135 150 363 Mbassis 61 157 169 387 Bambou 27 53 69 149 Total 8 516 994 985 2.495 Faoye 154 207 312 673 Fayil 161 170 200 531 Mar Lodj 130 216 327 673 Djilor Mar Soulou 112 170 154 436 Mar Fafako 230 302 427 959 Ndangane 50 29 60 139 Wandié 110 121 250 481 Total 7 947 1.215 1.730 3.892 Palmarin Ngalou 136 150 222 508 Palmarin (Sam-Sam) 96 236 132 464 Joal_1 (thiguiham) 103 187 96 386 Ndoubab_1 207 56 318 581 Ndoubab_2 273 136 191 600 Joal Fadiouth Mbodiène_1 207 136 209 552 Mbodiène_2 145 96 201 442 Fadial 52 87 108 247 Mbissel 300 214 182 696 Djiffer 63 17 89 169 Fadjouth 80 60 153 293 Total 11 1662 1.375 1.901 4.938 Djirda 200 200 300 700 Ngadior 40 50 60 150 Maya 40 51 47 138 Iles du Saloum Fambine 50 70 120 240 Bassoul 20 50 95 165 Thialane 75 110 150 335 Niodior 30 70 150 250 Total 7 455 601 922 1.978

84/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Areas Villages Men Women Young Total Baria 89 98 107 294 Koular Sarakholé 100 120 90 310 Koular Socé 120 100 200 420 K. Amadi Nganar 110 300 20 430 Koular Koutango 52 66 20 138 Saboya 100 100 100 300 Ndiayène poste 200 140 100 440 Mandéra 200 270 300 770 Total 8 971 1.194 937 3.102 TOTAL 59 5.724 6.528 7.784 20036

Figure An.7-1. Participation by population type (2009)

Figure An.7-2. Participation by area (2009)

85/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Annex 8 ANNEX 8: STATEMENTS OF THE DNA Statement of the DNA that project activities conform to national policies and legislation applicable to wetlands.

Statement of the DNA that project activities conform to the provisions of the Ramsar convention.

86/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

87/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Annex 9 ANNEX 9: LETTER OF THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT REGARDING EIA

88/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Annex 10

ANNEX 10: RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES

Conservation Protectio Biologica Type Family French name Scientific name Habitat status (IUCN) n status20 l status21 Reptiles Varanidae Varan du Nil Varanus niloticus - NPP R - Birds Psittacidae Perroquet youyou Poicephalus senegalus - NPP Rpos Savanna woodland, mangrove Savanna woodland, mangrove, Birds Psittacidae Perruche à collier Psittacula krameri - NPP R gallery forest Birds Ardeidae Aigrette garzette Egretta garzetta - NP Rpos Mangrove - Bolong Birds Ardeidae Aigrette intermédiaire Egretta intermedia - NP Rpos Mangrove - Bolong Birds Pandionidae Balbuzard pêcheur Pandion haliaetus - NP MW Mangrove - Bolong Mangroves in continental edges, Birds Accipitridae Busard des roseaux Circus aeruginosus - NP MW tannes and paddy Birds Ciconiidae Cigogne blanche Ciconia ciconia - NP MW Savanna, tannes, paddy Birds Phoenicopteridae Flamant rose Phoenicopterus ruber - NP MW Bolongs, flooded tannes Birds Laridae Goéland d'Audouin Larus audouinii - NP MW Bolong Birds Laridae Goéland leucophée Larus cachinnans - NP MW Bolong Birds Laridae Goéland railleur Larus genei - NP MW Bolong Mangrove, Bolong, Flooded Birds Ardeidae Grande Aigrette Egretta alba - NP Rpos tannes Birds Ardeidae Héron garde-bœuf Bubulcus ibis - NP Rpos Savanna, paddy, pastures Birds Ardeidae Héron goliath Ardea goliath - NP Rpos Mangrove, bolong Birds Strigidae Hibou petit-duc africain Otus senegalensis - NP Rpos Savanna woodland, mangrove Birds Accipitridae Milan noir Milvus migrans - NP MW Ubiquitous Birds Pelecanidae Pélican blanc Pelecanus onocrotalus - NP Rpos, Mangrove, Bolong, Flooded

20 NPP: National partial protection; NP: National protection 21 R: Resident breeding; Rpro: Probable resident breeding; Rpos: Possible resident breeding; MW: Wintering migrant: MIA: Intra-African migrant; Ov: Ocassional visitor 89/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

MIA tannes Mangrove, Bolong, Flooded Birds Pelecanidae Pélican gris Pelecanus rufescens - NP Rpos tannes Birds Accipitridae Pygargue vocifer Haliaeetus vocifer - NP Rpos Mangrove, large bolongs Rpos, Birds Sternidae Sterne caspienne Sterna caspia - NP Bolong MW Birds Sternidae Sterne caugek Sterna sandvicensis - NP MW Bolong Birds Sternidae Sterne hansel Sterna nilotica - NP MW Bolong Birds Sternidae Sterne naine Sterna albifrons - NP MW Bolong Rpos, Birds Sternidae Sterne pierregarin Sterna hirundo - NP Bolong MW Rpos, Birds Sternidae Sterne royale Sterna maxima - NP Bolong MIA Birds Sternidae Sterne voyageuse Sterna bengalensis - NP MW Bolong Mangroves in continental edges, Birds Accipitridae Vautour palmiste Gypohierax angolensis - NP R tannes and gallery forest Potentially Birds Scolopacidae Barge rousse Limosa limosa - MW Bolong (sandbancks) threatened Potentially Mangrove, Bolong, Flooded Birds Scolopacidae Courlis cendré Numenius arquata - MW threatened tannes Terrestrial Cercopithecidae Vervet ou Singe vert Chlorocebus aethiops - - Rpro Mangrove mammals Terrestrial Eupleridae Mangouste des marais Atilax paludinosus - NPP Rpos Mangrove mammals Marine Dauphin à bosse de Delphinidae Sousa teuszii Vulnerable - Ov Bolong mammals l'Atlantique Marine Trichechidae Lamantin Trichechus senegalensis Vulnerable NP Ov Bolong mammals

90/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Annex 11

ANNEX 11: ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT PHASES

1. Information search

In order to demonstrate steps 1 (a) and 1 (b) of the PROCEDURES TO DEMONSTRATE THE ELIGIBILITY OF LANDS FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION CDM PROJECT ACTIVITIES (EB 35 Report Annex 18), the following sources of information have been analysed to find information that reliably discriminates between forest and non-forest land according to the particular thresholds adopted by the host country:

 Direction des Travaux Géographiques et Cartographiques du Sénégal (DTGC), a national cartography institution  Institut Geographique National (IGN), French International and Senegalese geographic institute  Centre de Suivi Ecologique du Sénégal (CSE), a Senegalese ecological research center.  Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA): aerial photographs  Planet Action (Spot Foundation), an institution with Spot images  U.S. Geological Survey (www.usgs.gov), a website with Landsat images  Google Earth

Finally we selected the following sources/information:

 To demonstrate that the land (at the moment the project starts) does not contain forest: o Free Google Earth images (2003, 2004, 2005, 2008 and 2009).  To demonstrate that the activity is a reforestation project activity (was not forested in 1989): o For Sine Saloum: aerial photos (1/60.000) taken in March, 1989 by the JICA. The images were provided by the DTGC. o For the Casamance: 1989 Spot images provided by Planet Action.

2. Project boundary adjustments

A digitalization phase of all the planted sites was made with GPS Garmin Venture by IUCN France. Some adjustments of the GPS files were necessary to perform the eligibility study.

 The first phase of the work consisted in correcting and closing all the ground data taken by IUCN. This method was not able to be made automatically, thus these corrections were made manually.

 The second phase consisted in adjusting the project boundary polygons. A displacement of the polygons of 10 to 20 m due to the GPS accuracy was corrected manually based on the Google Earth images. The adjustment was performed in GIS software by overlaying the GPS data (plantation

91/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

polygons) on the Google Earth images. The following steps were necessary to perform the adjustment:  Google Earth images preparation: 198 were captured and georeferenced (142 for Casamance and 56 for Sine Saloum).  File conversion from the GPS software to the GIS files software: images were exported from .gdb file (MapSource22) to .shp file (ArcGis9.3).  Polygon adjustment. Polygons were adjusted to their location with the GIS software tools. Basically they were displaced and rotated, but their area was not affected. The specific tool used23 allows moving polygons without changing their shape or their surface.

3. Eligibility Study

Demonstrate that the activity is a reforestation project activity (was not forest in 1989):

Casamance: The study was performed using the 1989 Spot satellite images (10m/pixel). The forest land inside the plantation polygons was identified and project plantation area was classified as: forest in 1989 and nonforest in 1989. Images interpretation phase (by acting on the contrast, the luminosity and the transparency) was necessary because of the definition of images. It was also necessary to cut plantation polygons when there was more than one land use inside of them (forest and nonforest)24.

Sine Saloum: In this case, aerial photographs were used (1/60.000). First of all it was necessary to scan and georeference them. After that, as in Casamance, the plantation area was classified in two categories: forest in 1989 and nonforest in 1989.

Demonstrate that the land at the moment the project starts does not contain forest:

The same methodology was used for all the project area (Casamance and Sine Saloum). Georeferenced Google Earth images were used to identify the forest land inside the plantation polygons. In the plantation year, all the project area was deforested, but inside the plantation polygons it was necessary to verify that the mangrove “islands” complied with the national forest threshold (forest definition). An insignificant area was identified as forest in 2009 due to these “islands”.

Eligibility of lands

To determine the final project boundary, the following three steps were followed:

 Select all the plantation area that was not forest in 1989 and at the time the project started.

22 Software supplied with the Garmin GPS 23 Spatial Adjustment tool with the similary projection method 24 The tool Cut Polygon Features of the GIS software was used

92/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

 Consider only areas classified as: “Good ecological condition: Stratum 1” and “Regular ecological condition: Stratum 2”25  Remove (from the previous selection) all polygons smaller than 0.5 ha, due to area limitations set by the national forest threshold.

To perform the study, the planted area has been divided into polygons according to the land use in 1989 and in 2008/9, the plantation year, and the ecological conditions. All the eligibility study is summarized in one GIS file (.shp); the following table is an example of the table linked to the .shp file.

Table An.11-1: Example of the database linked to the .shp file NAME Area Quality 2009 1989 Centroid_X Centroid_Y Perimeter Region Department Arrondiss Com_Rurale Village Year Location Adeane Site 1 Parcelle A 1432,99 3 1 1 389392,49 1397086,59 306 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Adeane 2009 Casamance Adeane Site 1 Parcelle B 3763,69 3 1 1 389146,73 1397062,67 512 Ziguinchor Ziguinchor Niaguiss Adeane Adeane 2009 Casamance Afiniam Site 1 Parcelle A 6415,49 2 1 1 350958,08 1397994,19 825 Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Afiniam 2009 Casamance Afiniam Site 1 Parcelle B 5528,62 2 1 1 350748,35 1398050,94 649 Ziguinchor Bignona Tendouck Mangagoulack Afiniam 2009 Casamance

Where:

 NAME: name of the planted site (given by IUCN).  Area: surface (m²)  Quality: ecological condition (1:green; 2:yellow; 3:orange; 4:red)  2009: 1 (nonforest when the project stated) and 2 (forest when the project stated)  1989: 1 (nonforest in 1989) and 2 (forest in 1989)  Centroid X and Y: coordinates of the polygon center (UTM)  Perimeter: perimeter (m)  Region, Department, Arrondiss, Com Rurale, Village: information on the site localization  Year: plantation year  Location: Site localization in the both deltas

25 All the plantation area was classified by IUCN depending on its ecological conditions in four categories: good ecological conditions (green coded), regular (yellow coded), bad (orange coded) and too bad (red coded). For the CDM project only the two first classes was be taken into account.

93/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Summary results

1. Step by step results

Table An.11-2: Land use in 1989 and in 2008/9 (hectares) Non forest 1989 Forest 1989 Total Non forest Forest Non forest Forest Planted 2008/926 2008/10 2008/9 2008/10 Casamance 1566,62 0,07 31,8 0,4 1598,89 2008 169,36 0 4,18 0 173,54 2009 1397,26 0,07 27,62 0,4 1425,35 Sine Saloum 2009 215,28 0 24,1 0,21 239,59 1781,9 0,07 55,91 0,61 1838,49 Total 97% 0% 3% 0% 100%

Table An.11-3: Non forest lands in 1898 and 2008/9 classified by ecological conditions (hectares) Total (nonforest in Green Yellow Orange Red 1989 and in 2008/9) Casamance 1038,45 504,12 17,21 6,83 1566,62 2008 155,94 5,79 5,55 2,08 169,36 2009 882,52 498,33 11,66 4,75 1397,26 Sine Saloum 2009 136,34 67,57 11,37 0 215,28 1174,8 571,69 28,58 6,83 1781,9 Total 66% 32% 2% 0% 100%

Table An.11-4: Project area in hectares (nonforest in 1989 and 2008/9, good and regular ecological conditions and parcels > 0.5 ha) Plots < 0,5 Plots > 0,5 ha27 ha Total Casamance 1506,2 36,37 1542,58 2008 149,18 12,54 161,73 2009 1357,02 23,83 1380,85 Sine Saloum 2009 193,16 10,75 203,91 1699,36 47,13 1746,49 Total 97% 3% 100%

26 Eligible lands

94/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

2. Total planted area analysis

Table An.11-5: Forest lands in 2008/9 and in 1989 Forest in 2008/9 Forest in 1989 Area (ha) # sites Area (ha) # sites Casamance 0,47 6 32,20 116 Casamance 2008 - - 4,18 15 Casamance 2009 0,47 6 28,02 101 Sine Saloum 2009 0,21 3 24,31 97 Total 0,68 9 56,51 213

Figure An.11-1: Plantation area by ecological condition (%)

Table An.11-6: Total plantation area classified by ecological condition and year (ha and %) Green Orange Good Yellow Bad Red ecological Regular ecological ecological Too bad ecological conditions conditions conditions conditions Total Casamance 1058,36 515,1 17,27 8,16 1598,89 2008 160,12 5,79 5,55 2,08 173,54 2009 898,24 509,31 11,72 6,08 1425,35 Sine Saloum 2009 152,24 71,93 15,42 - 239,59 1210,6 587,03 32,69 8,16 1838,48 Total 65,8% 31,9% 1,8% 0,4% 100%

27 Final project area

95/96 UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECT ACTIVITIES (CDM-AR-PDD) - Version 05

Table An.11-7: Total planted plots smaller than 0.5 ha Plots smaller than 0.5 ha Total planted area Area (ha) # sites Area (ha) % Casamance 62,85 399 1598,89 3,9 2008 19,34 141 173,54 11,1 2009 43,51 258 1425,35 3,1 Sine Saloum 24,27 177 239,59 10,1 2009 Total 87,12 576 1838,48 4,7

- - - - -

History of the document

Version Date Nature of revision 05 EB 55, Annex 22 Restructuring to reflect changes applied in the design of approved A/R CDM 30 July 2010 baseline and monitoring methodologies. Due to the overall modification of the document, no highlights of the changes are provided. 04 EB 35, Annex 20  Restructuring of section A; 19 October 2007  Section “Monitoring of forest establishment and management” replaces sections: “Monitoring of the project boundary”, and “Monitoring of forest management”;  Introduced a new section allowing for explicit description of SOPs and quality control/quality assurance (QA/QC) procedures if required by the selected approved methodology;  Change in design of the section “Monitoring of the baseline net GHG removals by sinks” allowing for more efficient presentation of data. 03 EB 26, Annex 19 Revisions in different sections to reflect equivalent forms used by the Meth Panel 29 September 2006 and facilitating the transparent selection of an approved methodology for the proposed A/R CDM project activity. 02 EB 23, Annex 15a Inclusion of a section on the assessment of the eligibility of land and the Sampling 24 February 2006 design and stratification during monitoring. 01 EB15, Annex 6 Initial adoption. 03 September 2004 Decision Class: Regulatory Document Type: Form Business Function: Methodology

96/96