DOCSLIB.ORG

Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh: His Jurisprudence and Potential Impact on the Supreme Court

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh: His Jurisprudence and Potential Impact on the Supreme Court Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh: His Jurisprudence and Potential Impact on the Supreme Court Updated August 21, 2018 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45293 SUMMARY R45293 Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh: His Jurisprudence August 21, 2018 and Potential Impact on the Supreme Court Andrew Nolan, On July 9, 2018, President Donald J. Trump announced the nomination of Judge Brett M. Coordinator Kavanaugh of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) to fill Section Research Manager retiring Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s seat on the Supreme Court of the United States. Nominated to the D.C. Circuit by President George W. Bush, Judge Kavanaugh has served on Caitlain Devereaux Lewis, that court for more than twelve years. In his role as a Circuit Judge, the nominee has authored Coordinator roughly three hundred opinions (including majority opinions, concurrences, and dissents) and Legislative Attorney adjudicated numerous high-profile cases concerning, among other things, the status of wartime detainees held by the United States at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; the constitutionality of the current structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau; the validity of rules issued by the Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act; and the legality of the Federal Communications Commission’s net neutrality rule. Since joining the D.C. Circuit, Judge Kavanaugh has also taught courses on the separation of powers, national security law, and constitutional interpretation at Harvard Law School, Yale Law School, and the Georgetown University Law Center. Prior to his appointment to the federal bench in 2006, Judge Kavanaugh served in the George W. Bush White House, first as associate and then senior associate counsel, before becoming assistant and staff secretary to the President. Before his service in the Bush Administration, the nominee worked in private practice at the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis, LLP for three years and served in the Office of the Independent Counsel and the Office of the Solicitor General. Judge Kavanaugh began his legal career with three federal clerkships—two for judges on the federal courts of appeals and one for the jurist he is nominated to succeed, Justice Kennedy. Judge Kavanaugh is a graduate of Yale College and Yale Law School. Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination to the High Court is particularly significant as he would be replacing Justice Kennedy, who was widely recognized as the Roberts Court’s median vote. Justice Kennedy was often at the center of legal debates on the Supreme Court, casting decisive votes on issues ranging from the powers of the federal government vis-à-vis the states, to separation-of-powers disputes, to key civil liberties issues. Accordingly, a critical question now before the Senate as it considers providing its advice and consent to the President’s nomination to the High Court is how Judge Kavanaugh may view the many legal issues in which Justice Kennedy’s vote was often determinative. In this vein, understanding Judge Kavanaugh’s views on the law is one method to gauge how the Supreme Court might be affected by his appointment. In attempting to ascertain how Judge Kavanaugh could influence the High Court, however, it is important to note at the onset that, for various reasons, it often is difficult to predict accurately a nominee’s likely contributions to the Court based on his or her prior experience. That said, the nominee is a well-known jurist with a robust record, composed of both judicial opinions and non-judicial writings, in which he has made his views on the law and the role of the judge fairly clear. Central to the nominee’s judicial philosophy is the concept of judicial formalism and a belief that the “rule of law” must be governed by a “law of rules.” In addition, Judge Kavanaugh has endorsed the concept of the judge as a neutral “umpire.” In order to achieve this vision of neutrality, the nominee’s legal writings have emphasized (1) the primacy of the text of the law being interpreted, (2) an awareness of history and tradition, and (3) adherence to precedent. Applying these principles, Judge Kavanaugh’s views on several discrete legal issues are readily apparent, including administrative law, environmental law, freedom of speech, national security, the Second Amendment, and separation of powers. At the same time, perhaps because of the nature of the D.C. Circuit’s docket, less is known about the nominee’s views on other legal issues, including business law, civil rights, substantive due process, and takings law. This report provides an overview of Judge Kavanaugh’s jurisprudence and discusses his potential impact on the Court if he were to be confirmed to succeed Justice Kennedy. In particular, the report focuses upon those areas of law where Justice Kennedy can be seen to have influenced the High Court’s approach to certain issues or served as a fifth and deciding vote on the Court, with a view toward how Judge Kavanaugh might approach these same issues if he were to be elevated to the High Court. Of particular note, the report includes an Appendix with several tables that summarize the nominee’s rate of authoring concurring and dissenting opinions relative to his colleagues on the D.C. Circuit, and how Judge Kavanaugh’s opinions as an appellate judge have fared upon review by the Supreme Court. Congressional Research Service Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh: His Jurisprudence & Potential Impact on the Supreme Court Contents Predicting Nominees’ Future Decisions on the Court ..................................................................... 6 Judge Kavanaugh’s Judicial Approach, Philosophy, and Influences .............................................. 11 The Craft of Judging ................................................................................................................ 11 Judicial Philosophy ................................................................................................................. 19 Judicial Influences ................................................................................................................... 31 Statutory Interpretation .................................................................................................................. 34 General Theory ........................................................................................................................ 35 Application and Interpretive Tools .......................................................................................... 36 Severability ............................................................................................................................. 42 Administrative Law ....................................................................................................................... 44 Justiciability Issues .................................................................................................................. 45 Statutory Review ..................................................................................................................... 48 Discretionary and Factual Review .......................................................................................... 56 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 58 Business Law ................................................................................................................................. 59 Antitrust Law .......................................................................................................................... 60 Labor Law ............................................................................................................................... 65 Securities Law ......................................................................................................................... 68 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 71 Civil Rights .................................................................................................................................... 73 Statutory Civil Rights Law ...................................................................................................... 74 Voting Rights ........................................................................................................................... 79 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 83 Criminal Law and Procedure ......................................................................................................... 85 Fourth Amendment .................................................................................................................. 86 Constitutional Issues in Criminal Sentencing ......................................................................... 89 Other Criminal Procedure Issues............................................................................................. 90 Substantive Criminal Law ....................................................................................................... 92 Cruel and Unusual Punishments Under the Eighth Amendment ............................................ 93 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 93 Environmental Law
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ironic Feminism: Rhetorical Critique in Satirical News Kathy Elrick Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 12-2016 Ironic Feminism: Rhetorical Critique in Satirical News Kathy Elrick Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Elrick, Kathy, "Ironic Feminism: Rhetorical Critique in Satirical News" (2016). All Dissertations. 1847. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/1847 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IRONIC FEMINISM: RHETORICAL CRITIQUE IN SATIRICAL NEWS A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Rhetorics, Communication, and Information Design by Kathy Elrick December 2016 Accepted by Dr. David Blakesley, Committee Chair Dr. Jeff Love Dr. Brandon Turner Dr. Victor J. Vitanza ABSTRACT Ironic Feminism: Rhetorical Critique in Satirical News aims to offer another perspective and style toward feminist theories of public discourse through satire. This study develops a model of ironist feminism to approach limitations of hegemonic language for women and minorities in U.S. public discourse. The model is built upon irony as a mode of perspective, and as a function in language, to ferret out and address political norms in dominant language. In comedy and satire, irony subverts dominant language for a laugh; concepts of irony and its relation to comedy situate the study’s focus on rhetorical contributions in joke telling. How are jokes crafted? Who crafts them? What is the motivation behind crafting them? To expand upon these questions, the study analyzes examples of a select group of popular U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • History Review DEPARTMENT of HISTORY Dorothy F
    History Review DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters | Fall 2019 Newsletter FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY fau.edu/history Inside this Issue Message From and Latin American history, we welcome Dr. Christopher Davis as a full-time Visiting Student News ..................5 the Chair It is my pleasure to Lecturer for the 2019-20 academic year. Dr. Phi Alpha Theta ................6 welcome you to our Davis received his BA in History from the City DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Graduate Studies .............6 annual department University of New York-Hunter College and PhD newsletter. As in Atlantic History from Florida International 2018/19 M.A. Thesis.........8 usual, so much has University in 2018. His dissertation is entitled Abstracts happened in the last The Racial Equation: Pan-Atlantic Eugenics, Race, and Colonialism in the Early Twentieth Where are They Now?.....14 year that it is hard to distill it all into just a few paragraphs. After serving 28 years as a Century British Caribbean, and his teaching Graduates 2018/19 .........14 member of the faculty, Dr. Graciella Cruz-Taura and research focus on the United States, the Faculty Activity ..............16 retired in May 2019. Dr. Cruz-Taura has been Caribbean, and race and citizenship in the Department of History teaching colonial and modern Latin American Atlantic World. He has received numerous Florida Atlantic University, Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters history at FAU since 1991, and during that time prestigious grants and awards, including the PO Box 3091 Special points of interest has profoundly affected the lives of Mellon Mays Graduate Studies Enhancement 777 Glades Road countless students.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Communicating the Virtue of Friendliness
    Communication Law Review Volume 16, Issue 2 Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Communicating the Virtue of Friendliness Pat Arneson, Ph.D., Duquesne University* upreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia (1936-2016) and Ruth Bader Ginsburg S (1933-) enjoyed a long friendship, although they seldom agreed on legal matters due to differences in their views on both the Constitution and on the role of the court. Conservative Scalia and liberal Bader Ginsburg regularly and vigorously disagreed with one another on Supreme Court decisions. In an interview with Nina Totenberg, Scalia suggested, “Why don’t you call us the odd couple?”1 The juxtaposition of their opposing approaches to legal doctrine and their deep friendship strikes most people as a curious anomaly. This paper examines the relationship of Scalia and Bader Ginsburg in the context of Aristotle’s discussion of social virtues. I begin with a brief overview of the Justices’ lives prior to their appointment to the Supreme Court. Aristotle’s discussion of social virtues offers insight into public friendship and explains, in part, how Scalia and Bader Ginsburg communicatively engaged one another in person and in footnotes. Their friendship as associates on the court is evident in United States v. Virginia (1996). The symbolism of their friendship should receive greater attention in our contemporary political culture—as a lesson for what is needed in a time of political upheaval, pointing to the possibilities democracy holds. The Justices: Similarities and Differences A person’s life circumstances and personal choices shape the development of one’s character. Justices Scalia and Bader Ginsburg both grew up in New York City * Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Burton-Schreyerthesis.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF JOURNALISM “MORE THAN ENTERTAINMENT”: THE ROLE OF SATIRICAL NEWS IN DISSENT, DELIBERATION, AND DEMOCRACY SARAH BURTON FALL 2010 A thesis submitted in partiaL fuLfiLLment of the requirements for baccaLaureate degrees in JournaLism and PoLiticaL Science with honors in JournaLism Reviewed and approved* by the following: Martin E. Halstuk Associate Professor Thesis Supervisor Robert D. Richards John and Ann CurLey Professor of First Amendment Studies Honors Advisor *Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College ABSTRACT This research project argues that in an age of infotainment and a faiLing news media, satiricaL news has emerged as an important force in reveaLing truth and engaging an apathetic pubLic in politics and debate. Therefore, this research project seeks to distinguish and examine the roLes of satiricaL news in encouraging a deLiberative democracy. SatiricaL news has historicaL roots in the First Amendment as a loud critic and purveyor of political dissent. More recently, satirical news shows on television—the precursors to The Daily Show—have faced many barriers, incLuding poLiticaL party maneuverings, ratings, and faLLing advertising revenue, uLtimately finding that if staying power required potent satire, such roadblocks must be ignored. FinaLLy, poLiticaL comedians intend to affect change or prove an ideoLogicaL point through their satire, but often after criticism, hide behind the satirist shield and cLaim, "I'm just a comedian." Such a stance has benefits in that it encourages comedians to more fearLessLy chaLLenge pseudo-structures created by the political-media eLites, fiLLing the roLe traditionaLLy heLd by journaLists. At the same time, the satirist shieLd aLLows poLiticians and media eLites to throw satiricaL news critiques aside, regardLess of their truth and importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutive Rhetoric in the Stewart/Colbert Universe
    THE LOGIC OF IRONIC APPROPRIATION: CONSTITUTIVE RHETORIC IN THE STEWART/COLBERT UNIVERSE Christopher A.Medjesky A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2012 Committee: Michael L. Butterworth, Advisor Gary Heba Graduate Faculty Representative Joshua Atkinson Clayton Rosati ii ABSTRACT Michael L. Butterworth, Advisor Scholars have long considered myth to be the driving force of rhetorical constitution. While myth has and remains a key logic that aids rhetoric in the formation of audiences, Roland Barthes argues that myth is a tool best served to produce right-leaning political discourse. As such, the shared logic of myth has encouraged the constitution of audiences that are positioned to act in ways that lead to predetermined judgments of politics and society that reinforce current power structures. Yet, Barthes argues that, despite myth’s dominance in discourse, another logic must exist that is better suited for left-leaning political purposes. Looking at the related paratexts from Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, and the entire Stewart/Colbert universe, I argue this universe utilizes such an alternative logic to produce left- leaning constitutive rhetoric. This logic of ironic appropriation serves to hail an audience into being, position that audience toward action, and uses that action to make judgments about the world in which the audience lives. Using the three principles of ironic appropriation—irony, intertextuality, and interactivity—the Stewart/Colbert universe produces texts that encourage individuals to come together into an audience that questions the normalization of incommensurability in discourse and, instead, seeks to find ways to build bridges and increase political activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Law & the #Metoo Movement
    Stein Scholars Symposium Law & The #MeToo Movement Friday, April 5, 2019 10 a.m. – 5 p.m Reception to follow Costantino Room (Second Floor) This event is presented in conjunction with 100 Years of Women at Fordham Law, Fordham Law Women, National Lawyers Guild, Advocates for Sexual Health and Rights, and American Constitution Society for Law and Policy at Fordham Law. 9:30 – 10 a.m. 2 – 3:15 p.m. Check- in Panel 3- The #MeToo Movement in the Digital Age (1.0 professional practice; .5 ethics; 1.0 diversity, 10 – 10:15 a.m. inclusion and elimination of bias for experienced Introductory Remarks attorneys) Irin Carmon 10:15 – 11:30 a.m. Author, Notorious RBG; Senior Correspondent, Panel 1- Intersectionality & The #MeToo Movement New York Magazine & CNN Contributor (1.5 professional practice; 1.5 diversity, inclusion and elimination of bias for experienced attorneys) Sunu Chandy Legal Director, National Women’s Law Center Suzanne Goldberg Professor, Columbia Law School Sophie Ellman-Golan Communications Director, Women’s March Kalpana Kotagal Partner, Cohen Milstein Carrie Goldberg Founding Partner, C.A. Goldberg, PLLC Christelle Onwu Lead Advisor for African Communities, NYC 3:30 – 4:45 p.m. Commission on Human Rights Panel 4- The Future of The #MeToo Movement: Meredith Talusan What are the Next Steps? (1.0 professional Executive Editor, them practice; .5 ethics; 1.0 diversity, inclusion and elimination of bias for experienced attorneys) 11:45 a.m. – 1:15 p.m. Alex Baptiste Panel 2- Access to Justice & The #MeToo Movement Policy Counsel,
    [Show full text]
  • The Idolization of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
    Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Political Science Honors Projects Political Science Department September 2019 Notoriously Ruthless: The Idolization of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Lucille Moran Macalester College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/poli_honors Part of the American Politics Commons, Courts Commons, Judges Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Other Film and Media Studies Commons Recommended Citation Moran, Lucille, "Notoriously Ruthless: The Idolization of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg" (2019). Political Science Honors Projects. 80. https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/poli_honors/80 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science Department at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Notoriously Ruthless: The Idolization of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Lucille Moran Advised by Professor Patrick Schmidt Political Science Honors Project 1 May 2019 2 Abstract It is now a fixture of mainstream commentary in the United States that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has become a popular idol on the political left. Yet, while Justice Ginsburg’s image and story has reached an unprecedented level of valorization and even commercialization, scholars have yet to give sustained attention
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Razing Barriers in Gender Jillian Holbrook Senior Division Historical Paper Word Count
    Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Razing Barriers in Gender Jillian Holbrook Senior Division Historical Paper Word Count: 2,500 “As women achieve power, the barriers will fall. As society sees what women can do, as women see what women can do, there will be more women out there doing things, and we'll all be better off for it." 1 America was founded on the principles of inalienable rights: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness -- the belief that “all men are created equal.” Yet this particular wording divisively excluded half of the country’s population: women. At a time when the United States was racing to space, shooting for the stars, and landing on the moon, women were still not considered equal to their male counterparts and subjected routinely to gender discrimination because of it.2 American history is largely founded upon the Constitution -- including making necessary alterations to extend rights and protections to previously excluded groups of people, such as women.3 Through her founding of the Women’s Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), her trailblazing arguments in court against sex-based discrimination, and continued service protecting women’s rights as a Supreme Court justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg has demolished barriers in gender -- effectuating ineffable impact on furthering equality as a modern women’s movement catalyst. On March 15, 1933, Joan “Ruth” Bader was born to her parents, Celia and Nathan Bader, in Brooklyn, New York.4 As a child, she was inquisitive and astute -- qualities that would foreshadow her brilliant career in law and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF File
    NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION NOVEMBER 2020 Journal VOL. 92 | NO. 8 CONNECT WITH NYSBA VISIT NYSBA.ORG/BLOG Technology’s Role Who (or What) Is Liable for AI Risks? LAW PRACTICE in Helping the Congress and Big Tech (Trump, Elections, MANAGEMENT: Court System Courts and Hearings) MARKETING AUTOMATION Why the Courts Are Moving to Survive a Pandemic TOOLS LEVEL THE Microsoft Teams Christian Nolan PLAYING FIELD New York State Bar Association New York NYSBA Membership 2021 Renewal Is Now Open NYSBA membership grants you access to exclusive benefits and to be part of monumental change. Whether it’s adapting to the new virtual environment, participating in health law discussions, or speaking out on racial injustice, we are always looking to increase involvement via leadership and task force opportunities. Here’s a list of existing benefits and partners…with additional ones added throughout the year! • Complimentary CLE programs included with select Membership • 25%+ discount on all additional CLE programs offered • 25%+ discount on all NYSBA published books & forms • Complimentary copies of the NYSBA Journal, State Bar News, CasePrepPlus and NY Law Digest NYBSA Partners ABA Retirement Funds JDL Group Renew Online USI Affinity Insurance Ruby Receptionists ABACUSLAW UPS NYSBA.ORG/RENEW2021 Clio Digital Age Marketing Group or by phone 800.582.2452 LawPay Fastcase Don’t forget! Discounted entertainment, travel and activities. New York Yankees Radio City Music Hall NYC Zoos and Aquariums Brooklyn Nets Sightseeing Pass AVIS/Hertz Rental Cars Barclays Center *Select discounts and promotions will vary by partner From the NYSBA Bookstore Must-Have Best Sellers Titles Real Estate Titles: The Practice of Real Estate Law in Virtual Lawyering: A Practical Guide NEW RELEASE New York, 4th Ed NEW RELEASE Whether you are a litigator, transactional This is an invaluable resource for all real estate practitioners.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feminist Voice in Mainstream News Discourse
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations August 2016 The eF minist Voice in Mainstream News Discourse Rachel Kinnard University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Mass Communication Commons Recommended Citation Kinnard, Rachel, "The eF minist Voice in Mainstream News Discourse" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 1283. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1283 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FEMINIST VOICE IN MAINSTREAM NEWS DISCOURSE by Rachel Kinnard A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Media Studies at The University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee August 2016 ABSTRACT THE FEMINIST VOICE IN MAINSTREAM NEWS DISCOURSE by Rachel Kinnard The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2016 Under the Supervision of Professor Elana Levine This thesis analyzes the work of six self-identified feminist women who wrote opinion pieces for mainstream news and cultures sites in 2014. The internet and the widening public sphere has opened up new spaces for feminist writing that has allowed this writing to be published and read on a large and easily accessible platform. This group of women is an example of a broader generational development born out of third wave feminism, postfeminism, and the rise of online platforms for political commentary. By introducing traditionally private matters into the public sphere, their columns challenge dominant cultural discourse about political issues that are important to women.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Shift Summit Report the Power Shift Summit Report
    THE POWER SHIFT SUMMIT REPORT THE POWER SHIFT SUMMIT REPORT OVERVIEW Recent revelations about sexual harassment and misconduct launched a national outcry about pervasive problems in the media, film, manufacturing, technology, arts and other industries. The stories sparked a national conversation known as the “Me Too” movement, which has drawn needed attention to the issue of sexual harassment in the workplace. On Jan. 9, 2018, the Newseum held the Power Shift Summit with participation from more than 130 newsroom leaders, editors, reporters, educators and advocates. The summit was convened to generate a solutions-based discussion about what newsrooms and media organizations are doing now to deal with emerging cases of sexual misconduct, and what systemic changes are needed for the future. Results of the summit are summarized in this report, which identifies seven key Power Shift Principles, or lessons learned about workplace imbalances that are used to protect the powerful and intimidate and silence others, especially young women. The report also identifies critical steps to repair systemic failures that have allowed sexual misconduct and discrimination to thrive, along with tactics to create sustainable change. As a result of the summit, the Freedom Forum Institute, the programs partner of the Newseum, is creating the Power Shift Project, a major new initiative on behalf of women in the news industry. The project’s goal is workplace integrity, defined as eliminating sexual harassment and producing opportunity, especially for those who have historically been underrepresented in media’s most powerful roles. For more information, visit http://www.freedomforuminstitute.org/powershiftproject. Jill Geisler, the Bill Plante Chair in Leadership and Media Integrity at Loyola University Chicago, will help guide the Power Shift Project as the newly appointed Freedom Forum Institute Fellow in Women’s Leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Satirical News in Dissent, Deliberation, and Democracy
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY THE GRADUATE SCHOOL COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATIONS “MORE THAN ENTERTAINMENT”: THE ROLE OF SATIRICAL NEWS IN DISSENT, DELIBERATION, AND DEMOCRACY A Thesis in Media Studies by Sarah J. Burton © 2010 Sarah J. Burton Submitted in PArtiAl Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MAster of Arts December 2010 i The thesis of Sarah J. Burton wAs reviewed and approved* by the following: Martin E. Halstuk AssociAte Professor Thesis Supervisor Matthew Jordan AssistAnt Professor Robert D. Richards John And Ann Curley Professor of First Amendment Studies Marie Hardin DepArtment HeAd *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT This research project argues that in an age of infotAinment And A fAiling news mediA, sAtiricAl news hAs emerged As An importAnt force in reveAling truth And engaging an apathetic public in politics and debAte. Therefore, this research project seeks to distinguish And exAmine the roles of sAtiricAl news in encouraging a deliberAtive democrAcy. SAtiricAl news hAs historicAl roots in the First Amendment as a loud critic and purveyor of political dissent. More recently, satirical news shows on television—the precursors to The Daily Show—hAve fAced MAny bArriers, including politicAl pArty MAneuverings, rAtings, And fAlling Advertising revenue, ultiMAtely finding thAt if stAying power required potent sAtire, such roAdblocks must be ignored. FinAlly, politicAl comediAns intend to Affect chAnge or prove An ideological point through their sAtire, but often After criticism, hide behind the sAtirist shield And clAim, "I'm just A comediAn." Such A stAnce hAs benefits in thAt it encourAges comediAns to more feArlessly chAllenge pseudo-structures created by the political-mediA elites, filling the role trAditionAlly held by journAlists.
    [Show full text]