DOCSLIB.ORG

Civil Rights and Diversity Compliance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Civil Rights and Diversity Compliance ARIZONA BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2011 SUMMARY REPORT Kyle M. McCarty, Bald Eagle Field Projects Coordinator Kenneth V. Jacobson, Eagle Management Coordinator Nongame Branch, Wildlife Management Division Photo by Greg Joder Technical Report 266 Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program Branch Chief: Eric Gardner Arizona Game and Fish Department 5000 West Carefree Highway Phoenix, Arizona 85086 December 2011 CIVIL RIGHTS AND DIVERSITY COMPLIANCE The Arizona Game and Fish Commission receives federal financial assistance in Sport Fish and Wildlife Restoration. Under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the American with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the Arizona Game & Fish Department joins the U.S. Department of the Interior and its bureaus in prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information please write to: Arizona Game and Fish Department Office of the Deputy Director, DOHQ 5000 West Carefree Highway Phoenix, Arizona 85086 Or The Office for Diversity and Civil Rights U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4040 North Fairfax Drive, Room 300 Arlington, Virginia 22203 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT COMPLIANCE The Arizona Game and Fish Department complies with all provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This document is available in alternative format by contacting the Arizona Game and Fish Department, Office of the Deputy Director at the address listed above or by calling (623) 236-7290 or TTY 1-800-367-8939. RECOMMENDED CITATION McCarty, K.M. and K.V. Jacobson. 2011. Arizona bald eagle management program 2011 summary report. Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program Technical Report 266. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, Arizona. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors acknowledge and appreciate the assistance of the following people: Carole Glenn, Arizona Department of Transportation; Nick Fiscina, Arizona Public Service; Arizona State Parks Department; Janet Lynn, Arizona Army National Guard; Daniel Driscoll, American Eagle Research Institute; Tony Cecchi, GeoMarine Inc. (U.S. Air Combat Command); Mark Frank, Ft. McDowell Yavapai Nation; The Hopi Tribe; Liberty Wildlife Rehabilitation Foundation; Terry Gerber, Don Harris, Rick Poel, and Kyle Randall, Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department; National Audubon Society (Arizona chapters); Arthur Benally and Cay Ogden, National Park Service; Chad Smith and Viola Willeto, Navajo Department of Fish and Wildlife; Freeport McMoRan; Tom Weissmeuller, Rio Verde Ranch; Dan Daggett and Brian Gewecke, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community; John Keane, Lynn Bredimus, and Ruth Valencia, Salt River Project; April Howard, Daniel Juan, and Jeff McFadden, San Carlos Apache Tribe; Tonto Apache Tribe; John Arnett, U.S. Air Force (Luke Air Force Base); Wade Eakle, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Amy Heuslein, U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs; Tim Hughes, U.S. Bureau of Land Management; Alex Smith, Nicole Olsker, and Mike Norton, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation; Greg Beatty, Carrie Marr, and Mary Richardson, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Robert Mesta, USFWS Sonoran Joint Venture; Janie Agyagos, Deborah Brewster, Beth Dykstra, Noel Fletcher, Kelly Kessler, Amyann Madara, Vicente Ordonez, Henry Provencio, Albert Sillas, Andre Silva, Rachael Vaughn, Linda Whitetrifaro, Fred Wong, and Todd Willard, U.S. Forest Service; Robin Brean, Teresa Propeck, Verde Canyon Railroad; Cynthia Dale and Tim Gatewood, White Mountain Apache Tribe; Donna Bailloux, Elisabeth Burgard, James Driscoll, Barbara Jewett, Gloria Morales, Bill Van Pelt, and Arlene West, Arizona Game and Fish Department. A special thanks goes out to winter count coordinators and volunteers for their hard work and dedication, as well as to volunteers Ron and Doris Bell, Dave and Kathy Burton, Dave and Marcia Lamkin, Marta Peddie, and Perry and Irene Smith. This report, in part, summarizes the results of monitoring by the Arizona Bald Eagle Nestwatch Program using the breeding area reports submitted in 2011. Those include: Gretchen Henne and Brian Long, Bartlett Breeding Area (BA); Jennifer Lemieux and Philip MacAskill, Box Bar and Goldfield BAs; Joe Peddie and Marta Peddie, Crescent BA; Russell Seeley, Lisa Helgren, and Wyatt Nimitz, Ladders BA; Brittany Hoffnagle and Eric Hall, Needle Rock BA; Emily Willard and Neil Holcomb, Orme and Granite Reef BAs; Al ‘ Mac’ Evans and Sam Aguilar, Rodeo and Doka BAs; Dave Janssen and Sarah Betzler, Saguaro BA; Leah Vader and Jen Ottinger, Sycamore and Fort McDowell BAs; Greg Joder and Mary Raikes, Tonto BA; Dave Janssen, Emily Willard, and Sarah Betzler, Woods Canyon BA. PROJECT FUNDING Funding for this project was provided by: Arizona’s Nongame Wildlife Checkoff; the Arizona Wildlife Conservation Fund; the Arizona Game and Fish Department’s Heritage Fund; Arizona Public Service; Geo-Marine Inc.; Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community; Salt River Project; San Carlos Apache Tribe; U.S. Bureau of Land Management; U.S. Bureau of Reclamation; U.S. Department of Defense (Luke Air Force Base); U.S. Forest Service (Apache- Sitgreaves, Prescott, and Tonto National Forests); U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (State Wildlife Grant); and Verde Canyon Railroad. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Study Area ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Arizona Bald Eagle Winter Count .................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 6 Methods....................................................................................................................................... 7 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................... 8 Management Recommendations ................................................................................................. 9 Arizona Bald Eagle Nest Survey .................................................................................................. 10 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 10 Methods..................................................................................................................................... 10 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 11 New Locations Surveyed ...................................................................................................... 11 Historical Breeding Areas ..................................................................................................... 12 Survey sites with Existing Large Nests ................................................................................ 13 Breeding Areas...................................................................................................................... 14 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 16 Management Recommendations ............................................................................................... 17 Arizona Bald Eagle Nestwatch Program ...................................................................................... 18 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 18 Methods..................................................................................................................................... 19 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................. 20 Bartlett Breeding Area .......................................................................................................... 21 Box Bar Breeding Area ......................................................................................................... 22 Crescent Breeding Area ........................................................................................................ 22 Goldfield-Kerr Breeding Area .............................................................................................. 23 Granite Reef Breeding Area .................................................................................................. 24 Ladders Breeding Area ......................................................................................................... 25 Needle Rock Breeding Area ................................................................................................. 26 Orme Breeding Area ............................................................................................................. 27 Rodeo Breeding Area ............................................................................................................ 28 Saguaro Breeding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What a Gully
    ~~GOLLY9 WHAT A GULLY / History does not record the words spoken by Don Garcia Lopez de Cardenas, proud captain of Castile, that memorable day in 1540 when he and his companions looked into the Grand Canyon, the first Europeans to do so. In all probability those words were strong, soldierly expletives, although a footsore scribe, of a poetical bent, recorded for posterity and prying eyes in Spain that the buttes and towers of the Canyon which "appeared from above to be the height of a man were higher than the tower of the Cathedral of Seville." An apt description, my capitan! The gentle Father Garces came along in 1776 and was quite .impressed by the canyon, giving it the name of "Puerto de Bucareli" in honor of a great Viceroy of Spain. James 0. Pattie, trapper and mountain man, arrived at the canyon in 1826, the first American tourist to visit there. Unfortunately there were no comfortable Fred Harvey accommoda­ tions awaiting him and he was pretty disgusted .with the whole thing . "Horrid mountains ," he wrote . Lt . Joseph Ives , an explorer, came to the "Big Canyon" in 1857 and "paused in wondering delight" but found the region "altogether valueless. Ours has been the first and will doubtless be the last party of whites to visit this profitless locality ," was his studied opinion. But the lieutenant's feet probably were hurting him and he should be forgiven his hasty words . John Wesley Powell, twelve years later, arrived at the canyon the exc1tmg way - by boat down the Colorado. To him it was the "Grand" Canyon and so to all the world it has been ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Bighorn Council Transactions Volume 7 1963
    DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL TRANSACTIONS VOLUME 7 1963 Desert Bighorn Council i A COMPILATION OF FORMAL PAPERS PRESENTED AND DISCUSSIONS HELD AT THE SEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING APRIL 2, 3, AND 4, 1963 IN THE SCIENCE BUILDING OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA AT LAS VEGAS, NEVADA Compilod by CHARLES G. HANSEN AND EDMUNO L. FOUNTAIN THE DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL TRANSACTIONS ARE PUBLISHED ANNUALLY AND ARE AVAILABLE BY WRITING THE "DESERT BIGHORN COUNCiLe' P. 0. BOX 440, LAS VEGAS. NEVADA. COVER DRAWING, BY PAT HANSEN. PUBLISHED B Y: REYNOLDS ELECTRICAL h ENGINEERING CO.. INC. U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION CONTRACT AT(29-21-162 OCTOBER - 1983 SEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL April 2, 3, and 4, 1963 Las Vegas, Nevada TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Program - 1963 Desert Bighorn Council ........................... fV Group Photogra'ph .................................................. VII Roster .......................................................... VIII Desert Bighorn Council Award .................................... .xIV FORMAL PAPERS AM) DISCUSS IONS A HISTORY OF BIGHORN SHEEP IN CENTRAL NEVADA' - Mr. Merlin A. McColm ....................................... 3. PROGRESS AND HUNT RlEPORT Wr. Ray Brechbfll ........................................... J.2 WATER RELATIONSHIPS OF DESERT MAMMALS WITH SPECIAL RBFERENCE TO BIGHORN SHEEP . Mr. William G. Bradley .............O....................... 26 EXOTICS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS Dr. William Graf ........................................... 42 BIOUGICAL ASSAYS Dr. Edmund L. Fountain ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • M. Warren Krause Collection-Mss108
    M. WARREN KRAUSE COLLECTION-MSS108 TABLE OF CONTENTS Box 1 Arizona cities and towns-Ajo to Phoenix Box 2 Arizona cities and towns - Prescott to Yuma. Box 3 Arizona counties and other states Box 4 Points of interest - Albuquerque to Meteor crater Box 5 Points of interest- Mexico to White Mountains Box 6 Resorts and Guest Ranches Box 7 General subjects - Agriculture to Hunting and Fishing Box 8 General subjects - Indian Arts and crafts to sports and Recreation Box 9 Publications Box 10 Publications and correspondence Box 11 Newspaper clippings - Arizona cities and towns Box 12 Newspaper clippings - General subjects Agriculture - Indians, General Box 13 Newspaper clippings - History of Arizona Box 14 Newspaper clippings - General subjects Institutions and Schools to Stock Raising Points of Interest - Arizona, Mexico, other states Provenance: Donated to the Arizona Historical Society in 2012 by the Arizona Historical Foundation. BACKGROUND M. Warren Krause was a native of Chicago who came to Arizona in the mid-1920’s to work in the copy department of The Arizona Republic. He published The Arizona Guide continuously from 1938 until his death, except for four years during World War II when he served with the armed services in Europe. Mr. Krause was active in the Phoenix Advertising Club, the Phoenix Press Club, and he served two terms as third vice president in charge of the magazine division of the Arizona Newspaper Association. He was a member of the valley Field Riding and Polo Club. When Mr. Krause died on May 2, 1972 he was survived by his wife, Betty Fennemore, a daughter, Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Canyon Water Trail Is Located Along a Rugged and Remote Portions of the Colorado River in Nevada and Arizona Within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area
    Water Trail 1 Lake Mead National Recreation Area—Black Canyon National Water Trail The 26-mile long Black Canyon Water Trail is located along a rugged and remote portions of the Colorado River in Nevada and Arizona within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area. The trail begins at the base of the Hoover Dam and meanders through Black Canyon along 26 miles of the Colorado River. The trail ends at Eldorado Canyon, a historic mining area on Lake Mohave. This spectacular river setting provides unique paddling and rafting opportunities alongside wilderness. Visitors can stop at sandy beach- Kayaking is Very Popular es, colorful caves, plentiful coves and active hot springs. Desert Bighorn Sheep and other wildlife such as bald eagles, peregrine fal- cons, red-tailed hawks, osprey, cormorants and waterfowl are often seen along the route. There is a great deal of history associated Desert Bighorn Sheep with the Hoover Dam including the sauna cave, gauging sta- tions, catwalks, trails and building foundations. The National Water Trail System establishes in 2002, is a na- tional network of water trails cooperatively supported and sus- tained for the public to explore and enjoy. Designated water trails incorporate recreation opportunities, education about the value of the resource, conservation, community support, public information, and trail maintenance and planning. There are 16 within the National Water Trails System. Black Canyon Water Trail is the first water trail in the Southwest and the only water trail that traverses through a desert. (1) Users of the trail going downriver can either take out at Willow Beach or go an addition- al 14 miles and take-out at Eldorado Can- yon.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Vegas City Guide
    LAS VEGAS CITY GUIDE Made by dk. 25. August 2009 PERSONAL GUIDES POWERED BY traveldk.com 1 Things to do Las Vegas City Guide Things to do Aladdin Reopened in 2000, Aladdin hotel and casino megasresort bears the same name as its much humbler predecessor. Somewhat more expensive than the old Aladdin, the new one cost a cool $1.4 billion. The 50-ft (15-m) waterfall that tumbles down the faux-sandstone cliff at the entrance, the arches, and embellishments of the façade conjure images of exotic Arabian lands, which are echoed throughout the interior. One departure from the theme is the London Club, a posh casino within the casino for high rollers and VIPs. For more theme hotels (see Theme Hotels) For more on shopping (see Places to Shop) draperied and shuttered windows, ornate chandeliers, Top 10 Features and potted palms. Architecture and Josef’s Brasserie 1 Ambience 6 At Josef’s, the decor is casual French country, with In Vegas, hotels rise hand-painted murals and large, ornately framed mirrors. phoenix-like, not from the The menu features traditional dishes such as boudin ashes but from demolition blanc (pork and chicken sausage), quiche Lorraine, and sites. Aladdin is the city’s leg of lamb. Grand meal finales include bananas foster most recent phoenix (the and peach melba. The oyster bar, with seafood flown in original opened in 1967). The daily, gets rave reviews. whole is an Arabian fantasy of domes and minarets. Drawbacks are the Sur la Table somewhat confusing layout 7 In Desert Passage, Sur la Table is an outlet of one and the piped-in music that of America’s best houseware chains.
    [Show full text]
  • Autumn, 1968 Voi
    O. AUTUMN, 1968 VOI. XIV, N 2 * , Nancy Southworth, Mascoma Slalom, 1968 Photo by Bart Hauthaway 11 This Free-Loading House Ad Should Not Be Using This Space A sober, Hard-Working, Revenue-Producing, Possibly Even Huck- ster-Type Ad Needs and Deserves It. All over the country, there are sports boat and camping suppliers who would benefit from exposure to the adventurous and influential 1 readers of "American White Water." They are not getting our message, 1 but ony because We Have No National Advertising Director! If we could bake one, he would be: A New York area resident Experienced in advertising or salesmanship .Imaginative, hard-working, self-starting If you see anything in this description that even remotely resembles yourself, you might apply to the Chairman, Editorial Committee, Ameri- can White Water Affiliation, 459 Sixty-sixth St., Oakland, Calif. 94609. Meanwhile he is trying to bake one. - A- * WHITE WATER Sponsored by The American Whitewater Affiliation AUTUMN, 1968 Vol. XIV, No. 2 :ontents .RTICLES The he Colorado Hoover Dam ....................... Ann Schafer 4 American 'ominations, 1969 Board of Directors ........................... 10 Whitewater he 1969 World Championship Course ... Ted Young 13 AfFiIiation . White-Water Park ..................................... Jay Evans 20 ish-pole Slalom Gate .............................. Jay Evans 16 Board of Directors [elp in Buying Eastern Slalom Course ....................... 26 1968-69 he New River of West Virginia ... Gerhard Mueller 32 President pro tem OSCAR HAWKSLEY )EPARTMENTS Route 5 Warrensburg, Mo. 64093 ,etters ............................ 2 President's Soapbox 24 .ominations ................. 10 Conservation Comment 26 ROLAND W. DAVIS ,acing Report ............... 13 Dean's Cartoon ..... 25 Berkeley, Calif. 94707 ace Results .................
    [Show full text]
  • By Jeremiah B. Workman1 Prepared in Cooperation with The
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY EVALUATION OF SHORELINES ALONG LAKE MOHAVE, LAKE MEAD NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, NEVADA AND ARIZONA by Jeremiah B. Workman1 Open-File Report 96-651 Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature 'Box 25046 Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225 Denver, Colorado 1996 EVALUATION OF SHORELINES ALONG LAKE MOHAVE, LAKE MEAD NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, NEVADA AND ARIZONA by Jeremiah B. Workman Abstract A photogeologic study of the shorelines of Lake Mohave was done in order to assess the carrying capacity of camping beaches used by recreational boaters in the Lake Mead National recreation area. Shorelines along the lake were examined, analyzed, and classified into five categories based on physical parameters that dictate the overall shoreline quality and suitability in regard to recreational use. A digital l:100,000-scale map presents the five shoreline categories coded by color: (1) steep or rocky shoreline, (2) beach, (3) camping beach, (4) steep shoreline with cliffs, and (5) shallow shoreline. Introduction The U.S. Geological Survey in 1995 began working with the National Park Service under a new program called "Geology-in-the-Parks". The purpose of this program is to provide practical geological data to the Park Service in order to aid management of park land and its resources, and to assist the Park Service in interpreting the geology for the public. The Lake Mead National Recreation Area was selected for the shoreline studies because: (1) the USGS has considerable expertise in the geology of the region, and (2) Lake Mead is currently the fourth most visited park in the National Park system.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of the Grand Canyon and the Lower Colorado River by Earle E
    EXTRACT FROM . the grand canon A WORLDWIDE BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE GRAND CANYON AND LOWER COLORADO RIVER REGIONS in the United States and Mexico 1535–2018 90, 0 0 0 CATEGORIZED AND AUGM ENTED CITATIONS OF PUBLICATIONS FROM AROUND THE WORLD IN 95 LANGUAGES WITH EXTENSIVE BACKGROUND AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION EARLE E. SPAMER RAVEN’S PERCH MEDIA PHILADELPHIA 2019 1535 The Grand Canon 2018 Copyright © 2019 Earle E. Spamer Raven’s Perch Media Philadelphia, Pennsylvania EXTRACT RETRIEVED FROM https://ravensperch.org A Raven’s Perch Digital Production PDF USERS TAKE NOTE : HYPERLINKS TO OTHER SECTIONS OR CITATIONS WITHIN THIS EXTRACT ARE ACTIVE HYPERLINKS TO EXTERNAL SOURCES (ON THE WEB) ARE ACTIVE HYPERLINKS TO OTHER PARTS OF The Grand Canon COMPLETE VOLUME ARE NOT ACTIVE BECAUSE YOU ARE USING ONLY AN EXTRACTED PART (use the complete PDF volume to utilize these links) THE BIBLIOGRAPHY ALSO CONTAINS A FEW PUBLICATIONS DATED 2019 THAT WERE AVAILABLE IN DECEMBER 2018–JANUARY 2019 The Grand Canon, produced in digital format, renews and updates the monographic presentation of out-of-print inkprint editions of the Bibliography of the Grand Canyon and the Lower Colorado River by Earle E. Spamer (Grand Canyon Natural History Association, 1981, 1990, 1993). It complements but significantly elaborates upon on the online, searchable database (www.grandcanyonbiblio.org) sponsored by the Grand Canyon Association 2000–2019 (since 2018 the Grand Canyon Conservancy). The bibliography presented in The Grand Canon is the definitive version. This is not a commercial product and is not distributed by sale. The author receives no remuneration or services for the preparation or distribution of this product.
    [Show full text]
  • Siota of Lake Mead Lake Lake Mead Report Series NEVADA - ARIZONA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 92085355 9 2 0 8 5 3 5 5 \
    92085355 9 2 0 8 5 3 5 5 Siota of Lake Mead lational Recreation Area NEVADA - ARIZONA BIRDS OF THE LAKE MEAD NATIONAL RECREATION AREA LAME Technical Report No. 1 November 1978 Lake Mead Report Series UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE \ BIOTA OF THE LAKE MEAD NATIONAL RECREATION AREA Nevada/ Arizona The first major survey of the biological resources of the Lake Mead National Recreation Area was initiated in 1974 as a joint endeavor between the National Park Service and the University of Nevada/Las Vegas under the auspices of the Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, University of Nevada/Las Vegas. This research program consists of a series of interdisciplinary investiga­ tions that deal with the plants and animal life of the Lake Mead National Recreation Area and closely adjoining lands. Final reports that result from these studies will be reproduced in a LAKE MEAD PROJECT TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES that will be supplemented by technical papers published as Project Contributions in scientific journals. Cover Drawing by Pat Hansen COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS Department of Biological Sciences Las Vegas, Nevada 89154 BIRDS OF THE LAKE MEAD NATIONAL RECREATION AREA LAME Technical Report No. 1 November 1978 by John G. Blake Charles L. Douglas, Unit Leader Senior Research Scientist no-I nv* QH-3C5.1.KI4- NATIONAL PARK SERVICE/UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS Contract Nos. CX 8000-4-0031/CX 8000-6-0034 Contribution Number CPSJ/UNLV 008/09 ï z o t s & r Bateau of ßedamatioa Denver, CO BIRDS OF THE LAKE MEAD NATIONAL RECREATION AREA NEVADA/ARIZONA b y 1 John G.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the UNLV Libraries Collection of Regional History Files
    Guide to the UNLV Libraries Collection of Regional History Files This finding aid was created by Autumn Bassett, Violet del Toro Paz, Miguel Dominguez, and Sarah Jones. This copy was published on July 20, 2021. Persistent URL for this finding aid: http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/f1pf2j © 2021 The Regents of the University of Nevada. All rights reserved. University of Nevada, Las Vegas. University Libraries. Special Collections and Archives. Box 457010 4505 S. Maryland Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-7010 [email protected] Guide to the UNLV Libraries Collection of Regional History Files Table of Contents Summary Information ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Contents Note ................................................................................................................................ 3 Arrangement .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................. 4 Names and Subjects ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Collection Inventory .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Springs List for the United States, 1980
    THERMAL SPRINGS LIST FOR THE UNITED STATES National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Key to Geophysical Records Documentation No. I2 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Environmental Data and Information Service National Geophysical and Solar-Terrestrial Data Center Boulder, Colorado June 1980 KGRD CATALOG SERIES Listed below are catalogs published in the Key to Geophysical Records Documentation (KGRD) series. Those without an asterisk (*I may be obtained from National Geophysical and Solar-Terrestrial Data Center, NOAAIEDIS, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 80303; if preceded by an asterisk, from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, Virginia, USA, 221 61. KGRD No. 1, Marine Geophysical Data Catalog (superseded by KGRD No. 4). *KGRD No. 2, Catalog of Strong-Motion Seismograph Stations and Records (COM-74-10714). KGRD No. 3, Catalog of Earthquake Photographs (superseded by KGRD No. 11). KGRD No. 4, Marine Geophysical Data Catalog-1975 (superseded by KGRD No. 11). KGRD No. 5, Earthquake Data File Summary. *KGRD No. 6, Bibliography and Index to Literature on Manganese Nodules (1874-1975). KGRD No. 7, Catalog of Earthquake Photographs. KGRD No. 8, Catalog of Digital Bathymetric Data for the United States Coastal Regions. KGRD No. 9, Catalog of Seismogram Archives. KGRD No. 10, The Marine Geophysical Data Exchange Format-"MGD77". KGRD No. 1 1, Summary of Digital Marine Geophysical Data Holdings (Bathymetric, Magnetic, and Gravimetric Data). Additional information on the services of the National Geophysical and Solar-TerrestrialData Center is available from the address above. The following publications describe the services for geophysics and provide price lists: Earthquake Data Services and Publications Marine Geology and Geophysics Data Services and Publications Geomagnetism (Solid Earth) Dita Services and Pubkations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoover Powerplant Modification Environmental Impact Statement
    HOOVER POWERPLANT MODIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation OCT 2 9 MID o U.& FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE ES FIELD OFFICE. PHOENIX, AZ Surge Tank A8 .4 A9 Replacement 500 -MW Underground Powerhouse 500 - MW Surface Powerhouse • Aerial photograph of the location of the proposed alternatives for the Hoover Powerplant Modification Project, Hoover Dam and Powerplant, Arizona-Nevada. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION LOWER COLORADO REGION DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT HOOVER POWERPLANT MODIFICATION - CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA ABSTRACT The Bureau of Reclamation proposes to increase the generating capacity of the Hoover Dam and Powerplant by installing additional generators. The powerplant would be increased by either 260 or 500 megawatts for a total plant capacity of 2,060 or 2,300 megawatts. The environmental impacts associated with the proposed project are primarily due to increases in water velocity, which could reduce algae production, and increases in the weekly water level fluctuations on Lake Mohave, which could reduce the fishery. No endangered or threatened species would be jeopardized. There will be no cumulative or synergistic effects to the Colorado River Basin. This environmental impact statement is intended to serve environmental review and consultation requirement pursuant to: Executive Order 11988 (Floodplain Management) Executive Order 11990 (Wetlands Protection) Clean Water Act of 1977 (Section 404 r) Rivers and Habors Act of 1899 (Section 10) For Further Information Contact: Mr. Gary L. Bryant (Environmental) P.O. Box 427 Boulder City, Nevada 89005 Phone: (702) 293-8609 Mr. Martin P. Einert (Engineering) Same Address Phone: (702) 293-8510 Comments should be received by: AUG 04 1983 Statement Number: TNT 1)-eg 83 - Filing Date: MAY G 4 19,';3-- SUMMARY SUMMARY SUMMARY This summarizes the environmental effects and impacts of increas- ing the peaking capacity of Hoover Dam and Powerplant by constructing additional generating units.
    [Show full text]