DOCSLIB.ORG

Weltraum – Forschung Durch Satelliten Und Sonden

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Weltraum – Forschung Durch Satelliten Und Sonden Der Weltraum Erforschung durch Satelliten und Sonden Inhalt Satelliten im Erdorbit .................................................................................................................... 5 Arten von Satellitenorbits .......................................................................................................... 5 Parkbahnen .......................................................................................................................... 5 Niedrige Erdumlaufbahnen (Low Earth Orbit LEO) ............................................................... 6 Sonnensynchroner Orbit ....................................................................................................... 6 Mittlere Umlaufbahn (Medium Earth Orbit MEO) .................................................................. 6 Geotransferorbit (GTO) ......................................................................................................... 6 Geosynchroner Orbit (GSO) ................................................................................................. 6 Geostationärer Orbit (GEO) .................................................................................................. 6 Supersynchroner Orbit .......................................................................................................... 6 Hoch elliptische Umlaufbahn (Highly Elliptical Orbit HRO) ................................................... 6 Friedhofsorbit ........................................................................................................................ 6 Sonstige Umlaufbahnen ........................................................................................................ 7 Lebensdauer von Erdumlaufbahnen ........................................................................................ 7 Gamma und Röntgenstrahlung ................................................................................................ 7 Uhuru (USA) ......................................................................................................................... 8 HEAO 2 (USA) (Einstein-Observatorium) ............................................................................. 8 ASTRON (UdSSR)................................................................................................................ 8 EXOSAT (Europa) ................................................................................................................ 9 ROSAT (Deutschland) .......................................................................................................... 9 Infrarot Strahlung ...................................................................................................................... 9 IRAS (Niederlande) ............................................................................................................... 9 COBE (USA) ......................................................................................................................... 9 Hubble Weltraumteleskop (HST) (Europa + USA) ................................................................ 9 Spitzer Weltraumteleskop (USA) ........................................................................................ 10 Reparatur Satellit ....................................................................................................................... 10 Mission Extension Vehicle-1 MEV-1 ................................................................................... 10 Astrometrie Satelliten ................................................................................................................. 10 Hipparcos (Europa) ............................................................................................................. 10 Gaia (Europa) ..................................................................................................................... 10 Die Suche nach Exoplaneten ................................................................................................. 11 Kepler ................................................................................................................................. 11 TESS (USA) ........................................................................................................................ 11 CHEOPS ............................................................................................................................. 11 PLATO (Europa) ................................................................................................................. 11 Weitere Erforschung .................................................................................................................. 12 COBE (USA) ....................................................................................................................... 12 MOST (Kanada) .................................................................................................................. 12 Gravity Probe B (USA) ........................................................................................................ 12 COROT (Deutschland + Frankreich) ................................................................................... 12 Raumstationen ........................................................................................................................... 13 Saljut (UdSSR) ................................................................................................................... 13 Apollo – Sojus (UdSSR + USA) .......................................................................................... 13 MIR (UdSSR) ...................................................................................................................... 13 Skylab (USA) ...................................................................................................................... 14 ISS (international) ............................................................................................................... 15 Space Shuttle ............................................................................................................................. 16 1 Der Erstflug ......................................................................................................................... 17 Challenger Unglück (1986) ................................................................................................. 17 Columba Unglück (2003) .................................................................................................... 17 Sonden zum Mond ..................................................................................................................... 18 Luna 2 (UdSSR) ................................................................................................................. 18 Aufnahmen beim Vorbeiflug und aus dem Orbit ..................................................................... 18 Zond 3 (UdSSR) ................................................................................................................. 18 Zond 4 bis 8 ........................................................................................................................ 18 Zond 7 ................................................................................................................................. 18 Lunar Orbiter 4 (UdSSR) .................................................................................................... 18 Lunar Orbiter 5 (UdSSR) .................................................................................................... 18 Explorer 49 (USA) ............................................................................................................... 18 Luna 22 (UdSSR)................................................................................................................ 19 Clementine (USA) ............................................................................................................... 19 SMART 1 (Europa) ............................................................................................................. 19 Kaguya (Japan) .................................................................................................................. 19 Sonden auf der Oberfläche .................................................................................................... 19 A) Weich gelandete Sonden ........................................................................................... 19 Luna 9 (UdSSR) ................................................................................................................. 19 Surveyor 1 (USA) ................................................................................................................ 19 Surveyor 3 .......................................................................................................................... 19 Surveyor 5 .......................................................................................................................... 19 Surveyor 6 .......................................................................................................................... 19 B) Bemannte Missionen ................................................................................................. 20 Apollo 8 (USA) .................................................................................................................... 20 Apollo 10 ............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uncontrolled Re-Entries of Spacecraft and Rocket Bodies: a Statistical Overview Over the Last Decade
    Uncontrolled Re-Entries of Spacecraft and Rocket Bodies: A Statistical Overview over the Last Decade Carmen Pardinia1*, Luciano Anselmoa2 a Space Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Institute of Information Science and Technologies (ISTI), National Research Council (CNR), Via G. Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy 1 [email protected]; 2 [email protected] * Corresponding Author Abstract More than 24,400 catalogued orbiting objects have re-entered so far into the Earth’s atmosphere since the beginning of the space age. The associated returning mass, close to 30,000 metric tons, was mainly concentrated in intact objects, i.e. payloads and spent upper stages, accounting for nearly 29% of the re- entered objects. During the 10 years from 2008 to 2017, almost 450 large intact objects have re-entered without control, with a total returning mass of approximately 900 metric tons. Since the beginning of 2018 until mid-November, nearly 86 metric tons of returned materials were associated with almost 65 uncontrolled re-entries of large intact objects, three of which with a mass exceeding 5 metric tons: the Zenit-3F second stage 2017-086D, the C-25 cryogenic upper stage 2017-031B, and the Chinese space station Tiangong-1. After an overview of the most critical historic re-entry events, the attention will be focused on the re- entries of massive objects occurred without control from 2008 to 2017, by categorizing them in terms of relevance, re-entry frequency, returned mass, distribution in inclination, overflown latitude bands, eccentricity and perigee/apogee altitudes before re-entry. Cases in which spacecraft and rocket bodies components were retrieved, and eyewitnesses sightings were reported, will be presented as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Proton (UR-500) Family Home Launch Vehicles USSR / Russia
    Please make a donation to support Gunter's Space Page. Thank you very much for visiting Gunter's Space Page. I hope that this site is useful a nd informative for you. If you appreciate the information provided on this site, please consider supporting my work by making a simp le and secure donation via PayPal. Please help to run the website and keep everything free of charge. Thank you very much. Proton (UR-500) family Home Launch Vehicles USSR / Russia Proton Proton-K Proton-K Blok-D (Zond L1) Proton-K Blok-D-1 (Granat) [ILS] Proton-K Blok-DM-2 Proton-K Blok-DM1 (Inmarsat-3 F3) similar: Proton-K Blok-D, Proton-K Blok-D-2 Proton-K Blok-DM2 Proton-K Blok-DM3 Proton-M Briz-M (Thor 5) [ILS] similar: Proton-K Blok-DM-5 similar: Proton-K Blok-DM4, similar: Proton-K Briz-M Proton-K Blok-DM-2M Version Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Proton (8K82) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0208 + 1 × RD-0209 - - Proton-K (8K82K) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0210 + 1 × RD-0211 8S812 / RD-0212 - Proton-K Blok-D (8K82K 11S824) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0210 + 1 × RD-0211 8S812 / RD-0212 Blok-D / RD-58 Proton-K Blok-D-1 (8K82K 11S824M) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0210 + 1 × RD-0211 8S812 / RD-0212 Blok-D-1 / RD-58M Proton-K Blok-D-2 (8K82K 11S824F) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0210 + 1 × RD-0211 8S812 / RD-0212 Blok-D-2 / RD-58M Proton-K Blok-DM (8K82K 11S86) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0210 + 1 × RD-0211 8S812 / RD-0212 Blok-DM / RD-58M Proton-K Blok-DM-2 (8K82K 11S861) 8S810 / 6 × RD-253 8S811 / 3 × RD-0210 + 1 × RD-0211 8S812
    [Show full text]
  • October 1998 Volume 3, Issue 4
    A publication of The Orbital Debris Program Office NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas 77058 October 1998 Volume 3, Issue 4. NEWS Imagery Survey of the Hubble Space Telescope During the second servicing mission of the measurements of the impact features. expected exponential increase down to a size Hubble Space Telescope (HST) by the STS-82 of 0.4-0.5 cm, where sensitivity limits of the mission in February 1997, an extensive Over 500 of the impacts were found on the aft imagery apparently lead to a reduced count. imagery survey was performed covering shroud and equipment section where highly The distribution of impacts around the aft approximately 97% of the HST surface. The reflective surfaces facilitated detection of shroud suggest a real difference in the number results of a dedicated study to of particle impacts on the +V3 and identify and to characterize the –V3 sides. apparent micrometoeoroid and orbital debris (M/OD) impacts An attempt was also made to have been recently documented compare the number of impacts in a new NASA JSC report, seen on the first servicing mission "Survey of the Hubble Space in December 1993 (after 44 months Telescope Micrometeoroid and exposure in LEO) and the second Orbital Debris Impacts from servicing mission (after an Service Mission 2 Imagery," by additional 38 months exposure in G. J. Byrne, D. R. Bretz, M. H. LEO). A limited comparison of the Holly, M. T. Gaunce, and C.A. +V3 quadrant showed an increase in Sapp. the density of observed strikes from approximately 5 impacts per square Employing video, photography, meter to approximately 20 impacts and electronic still imagery (a per square meter.
    [Show full text]
  • Energiya BURAN the Soviet Space Shuttle.Pdf
    Energiya±Buran The Soviet Space Shuttle Bart Hendrickx and Bert Vis Energiya±Buran The Soviet Space Shuttle Published in association with Praxis Publishing Chichester, UK Mr Bart Hendrickx Mr Bert Vis Russian Space Historian Space¯ight Historian Mortsel Den Haag Belgium The Netherlands SPRINGER±PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION SUBJECT ADVISORY EDITOR: John Mason, M.Sc., B.Sc., Ph.D. ISBN978-0-387-69848-9 Springer Berlin Heidelberg NewYork Springer is part of Springer-Science + Business Media (springer.com) Library of Congress Control Number: 2007929116 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. # Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2007 Printed in Germany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a speci®c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: Jim Wilkie Project management: Originator Publishing Services Ltd, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK Printed on acid-free paper Contents Ooedhpjmbhe ........................................ xiii Foreword (translation of Ooedhpjmbhe)........................ xv Authors' preface ....................................... xvii Acknowledgments ...................................... xix List of ®gures ........................................ xxi 1 The roots of Buran .................................
    [Show full text]
  • SAT - TV Koju! Huviringis Ulo-D
    ISSN 0134-2282 horisont SAT - TV koju! Huviringis Ulo-d J V Kusmoselendurid 1961-1988 4 Eesti NSV ühingu «Teadus» populaarteaduslik ajakiri Asutatud 1967. a. Ilmub kord kuus EKP Keskkomitee Kirjastus, Tallinn Ultraviolettfoto Maast. (lk. 35). «Buran» stardi ootel (algus Sisukord lk'w>' AASTA MOSAIIK ’88 Uno Veismann 1 Toimetuse kolleegium: Ustus Agur, Harri Jänes, Priit Järve, PROJEKT «FOBOS» 5 Juhan Kivi, Endel Lippmaa, Viktor KAS LEND MARSILE SAAB REAAL­ Maamägi, Uno Mereste, Charles Vill­ SUSEKS? Juri Zaitsev 6 mann. MAAVÄLISTE TSIVILISATSIOONI­ DE OTSIMISE PROGRAMMIST 9 ORBIIDILE «BURANIL» Irina Jegorova 11 Peatoimetaja 43 77 71 INDREK ROHTMETS AEROKOSMILISED LENNUKID 12 Peatoimetaja asetäitja 44 33 70 KUI PALJU ÕN MAA TEHIS- JUHAN KIVI KAASLASI? 13 Vastutav sekretär 43 77 22 SN 1987A MÕISTATUSED LAHENE­ ÜLLAR LEHTMETS VAD Peep Kaiv 15 Ühiskonnateadused 44 50 06 MARTIN ROOGNA SUPERNOOVA ÜLETAS VALGUSE ILMAR PALLI KIIRUSE? 17 Reaalteadused 44 43 85 KOSMOS LOODUSLIKU PLASMA- REIN VESKIMÄE LABORATOORIUMINA Tamara Breus 18 Kunstiline toimetaja 44 43 85 NEMAD OLID KOSMOSES 21 EPP MARGUSTE Tehniline toimetaja UFOd: OLETUSED JA PÕHJEN­ ja korrektor 44 43 85 DUSED (Intervjuu Vsevolod Troitskiga) 25 TIIU KUKK KOSMOS PANEB PROOVILE 31 PÜÜDKEM AKENT AVADA Peeter Vilborn 33 Temaatilise numbri koostas REIN VIRMALISTE OVAAL JA AUGUD VESKIMÄE. MAA ATMOSFÄÄRIS 35 Lühiuudiseid vahendasid PEEP LÜHIDALT KOSMOSEST 30, 36, 37 KALV, JURI ZAITSEV ja UNO VEISMANN. Ladumisele antud 20. 02. 1989. Trükkimisele antud 17. 03. 1989. Tiraaž 39 000. Paber 60X84/8. Tingtrükip. 4,67. Trükipoognaid 5. Tingvärvipoognaid 14,88. Arves- tuspoognaid 6,90. MB-04054. Teil. nr. 863. EKP Keskkomitee Kirjastuse trükikoda. Tallinn, Pärnu mnt.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume One: 1957-2063
    SPACECRAFT of EARTH Volume One: 1957-2063 7TH EDITION 2380 Edited by Lieutenant General Scott A. Akers, SFMC The definitive reference guide to historical spacecraft SPACECRAFT OF EARTH Volume One: 1957-2063 By Lieutenant General Scott A. Akers, SFMC A joint project of The Jaxon Information Institute Panda Press Interstellar & the Defense Forces Institute Masthead CHIEF EDITOR / PUBLISHER Lieutenant General Scott A. Akers Chief Historian, Office of Fleet Historian TECHNICAL EDITOR Admiral Chris Wallace Chairman– Starfleet Advanced Starship Design Bureau PRODUCTION EDITORS Admiral Allyson M. W. Dyar Vice Admiral Kurt F. Roithinger Starfleet Command PROJECT COORDINATOR Major William M. Myers Office of Fleet Historian HISTORICAL CONSULTANTS Admiral Alex Rosenzweig Starfleet Command Copyright © 2380 by the Office of Fleet Historian, Starfleet Command, New Masada Facility General Robb J. Jackson Previous Editions: 2366, 2360, 2348, 2331, 2326, and 2302 Starfleet Marine Corps Historian LAYOUT CONSULTANT This document prepared and published by Jaxon Information Institute (Seattle Metroplex, Earth) for the Office of Colonel John Adcock Fleet Historian Starfleet Marine Corps Memory Alpha Cataloging Data: GRAPHICS UFPI ITP/SP 3632459346-3000/18 Commodore David Pipgras Office of Graphic Design This edition of Spacecraft of Earth is authorized for viewing only in member star systems of the United Federation SUPPORT STAFF of Planets, its territories and possessions, affiliated star systems, and select independent and neutral star sys- tems. Doctor Michael Okuda, PhD. Doctor Rick Sternbach, PhD. Special acknowledgements to Anthony Rowley, Don Willits, John Adcock, Chris Wallace, Alex Rosenzweig, Kurt Doctor Andreas Kitabatu al-'Qalb, PhD. Roithinger, Allyson Dyar, and Donna Francis without whose much needed assistance this project could not have been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmogram-L? / Lv86har31 / J
    cosmogram-l? / lv86Har31 / J. Oberg 13 re-rendezvous with Salyut-7 in Rt 2 Box 350, Dickinson IX 77539 USA extra day of maneuvers following his MIRsAN ADMIRABLE MIRACLE or HI RASE? d e p a r t u r e , be -f o r e ret u r n i n g t o E a r t h „ First, sincere congratulations to Thi s demonstrated stati on-to-stati on Pi et Sitio 1 d e r s f or r ep or t i ng 1 ast yeat- intra-orbital transfer.:! Aviation that the new six-module station would Week had reported that their man in be cal 1 ec! " Mi r " , and -F or pub 1 i sh i ng Moscow had learned that a "new crew" a n e x c e 11 e n t s c h e m a t i c o f i t w h i cwoul h d be sent to Salyut-7 to retrieve w a s n e a r 1 y p e r -f e c: t (he h a d t h e peri-the French comet dust collector. We pheral ports at the large end, not have also speculated the Salyut 7 the small end). His seeing was the visit could load Kosmos-1686 with clearest o-f all even t he Pen t ag on goodies such as the two new space- paid compliments by stealing his suits, tool kits, four year's supply drawing -for the 1985 "Soviet Military of amusement tapes/books, other con- Power" report„ sumables, cameras, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the On-Ground Risk During Re-Entries
    ASSESSMENT OF THE ON-GROUND RISK DURING RE-ENTRIES H. Klinkrad Mission Analysis Section, ESA/ESOC, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany ABSTRACT they produce a significant mass percentage of break-up fragments which can withstand the aerothermal heat flux and structural loads during re-entry, and which can gen- The present paper outlines methods which allow to quan- erate ground impacts with significant risk levels to the tify and monitor the on-ground population risk in the population within the debris swath. Historic examples course of a hazardous re-entry event. The risk poten- of this category were the re-entries of Skylab (on 11-Jul- tial will be derived from an object related casualty cross- 1979, with a mass of 74 t), and Salyut-7 (on 07-Feb-1991, section, the endangered ground swath, and the underlying with a mass of 40 t). The latest, most massive object in population density. Means will be described to perform a space history to re-enter was Mir (on 23-Mar-2001, with long-term risk assessment for a given latitude band, and a a mass of 135 t). The re-entry of Skylab was analysed in short-term risk assessment for a given nodal longitude of detail by Dreher [2] et al., while the Salyut-7 event was the final re-entry orbit. In case of residual manoeuvring well documented in the proceedings of an ESOC work- capabilities strategies will be outlined to manage and re- shop [5]. Results of re-entry simulations with satellite duce the risk potential by controlling the nodal longitude break-up models were compiled by Fritsche [3] et al., of the final orbit, and the impact footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • WORLD SPACECRAFT DIGEST by Jos Heyman CANCELLED SPACECRAFT Version: 19 February 2016 © Copyright Jos Heyman
    WORLD SPACECRAFT DIGEST by Jos Heyman CANCELLED SPACECRAFT Version: 19 February 2016 © Copyright Jos Heyman This file includes details of selected cancelled spacecraft and programmes where such spacecraft were related to actual spacecraft listed in the main body of the database or were significantly developed or completed at the time of cancellation. Name: AggieSat-1 Country: USA Launch date: September 2007 Launch vehicle: STS AggieSat-1 was a microsatellite proposed by the Texas A&M University to undertake three technology experiments: 1. a simple microsatellite propulsion system using water as the propellant; 2. a versatile miniature positioning mechanism using a reusable shape memory alloy as the actuator; and 3. an enzymatic energy source using glucose as the fuel. It was developed as part of the Air Force Research Laboratory's Nanosat-4 competition and was co- sponsored by of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, NASA and the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. AggieSat1 was not selected by the Air Force but the experience served in the development of AggieSat-2 (2009 038B). Name: Altair-1 Country: USA Launch date: December 2018 Launch vehicle: Ares V The Altair, formerly known as the Lunar Surface Access Module (LSAM) was to be the main spacecraft for crewed lunar mission as part of the Constellation programme announced by President Bush on 14 January 2004 and cancelled by President Obama in 2010. It would have been capable to fly four astronauts to the Moon, land them on the Moon, provide life support and a base for the astronauts during their stay on the Moon and then fly them back into lunar orbit where they would dock with the Orion spacecraft for the return flight to Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (Iadc)
    INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IADC) SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION Presented to: 35th Session of the SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL SUBCOMMITTEE COMMITTEE ON PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE UNITED NATIONS On behalf of the IADC INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE • ESTABLISHED IN 1993: - TO EXCHANGE INFORMATION ON SPACE DEBRIS RESEARCH ACTIVITIES BETWEEN MEMBER SPACE AGENCIES, - TO FACILITATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR COOPERATION IN SPACE DEBRIS RESEARCH, - TO REVIEW PROGRESS OF ONGOING COOPERATIVE ACTIVITIES, AND - TO IDENTIFIY DEBRIS MITIGATION OPTIONS • OF THE FOUR IADC WORKING GROUPS, TWO ARE DEDICATED TO EXPLORING NEW AND MORE EFFECTIVE MITIGATION TECHNIQUES. IADC MEMBERSHIP • THE PRESENT IADC MEMBERS ARE AS FOLLOWS: - BRITISH NATIONAL SPACE CENTRE (BNSC) - CENTRE NATIONAL d'ETUDES SPATIALES (CNES) - CHINA NATIONAL SPACE ADMINISTRATION (CNSA) - EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY (ESA) - GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER (DLR) - INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION (ISRO) - NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) - JAPAN - RUSSIAN SPACE AGENCY (RKA) TH • THE MOST RECENT IADC MEETING (15 ) OCCURRED IN DECEMBER 1997 WITH MORE THAN 100 PARTICIPANTS. SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION MITIGATION COMPRISES THREE MAIN ASPECTS - PREVENTION OF SPACE DEBRIS - PROTECTION OF SPACE SYSTEMS AGAINST DEBRIS - REMOVAL OF SPACE DEBRIS • THE CURRENT SPACE DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT POSES NO UNACCEPTABLE RISKS TO SPACE MISSIONS. • WITHOUT MITIGATION, FUTURE SPACE OPERATIONS WILL FACE AN INCREASINGLY HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT. • THE PRINCIPAL OBJECTIVE OF SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION
    [Show full text]