DOCSLIB.ORG

File on Demand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
File on Demand FILE ON DEMAND Dear Sir/Madam, There are several issues caetaris paribus that have arisen to the attention of the international community that make it necessarily impossible for my acting sovereign being to comply with your commands in order to remain within my law which is my Bible that I received at my Christening on the 7th February 1970 which evidenced a Birth Certificate provided by receipt of a copy of an entry. Firstly you have been invoiced for the sum of £50 for continuing to send correspondence via the Universal Postal Union under Swiss Federal Law presuming authority under any corporate heading other than that of the Vatican. The fifty pounds is levied since the content of your communication caused me to raise my eyebrows as noted in my schedule [terms included]. Another charge is levied for £250,000 for the necessity of my supplying you with this letter that you are reading (the original copy of which I hold for proof of authenticity) also noted in my schedule. Since the One Peoples Public Trust foreclosed the corporate system run by the Rothschild dynasty et al on the 25th December 2012 following the Paradigm Report; thereby leaving only the Vatican intact as a trusted corporation, there has now been ample time for the ceasing of such claims with neither current corpus delicti nor locus standi, nor either the mens rea or actus reus demonstrated by me to you for any indictments. The Triffin Dilemma has manifested a state of slavery within the global monetary system wherein the fictitious debts of fiat values are repaid by the blood & sweat of the common people prompting the reinstitution of Common Law Authorities worldwide. It is a responsibility for every individual to appraise him or her self of the current laws and not rely on third party say so including, but not limited to, the BBC and the Houses of Parliament whom are both implicated in ongoing sexual deviance against children by participation or silence. I have no doubt, Sir/Madam, that you, the reader, yourself believe that I owe the money and that this is something you were told by a third party rather than something you yourself have ascertained by your own efforts. This alone is a dereliction of fiduciary capacity to which every human being has a duty of care, particularly so under the Geneva Convention and Nuremburg Codes by International Law, and the natural trust between each of ourselves, The Christ and God as the basis of personal Equity. As a Common Law Sheriff, I, Adam Yates, having taken public oath to uphold the Common Laws, cannot allow the imposition of this artifice into my personal realm so as to commit the crime of fraud by impersonation since the capitalised name you are referring to “A-D-A-M-Y-A-T-E-S” is a securitised entity not of my ownership nor creation at Common Law. Securitisation (the practice of dividing estates in land into legal and equitable interests to perform Usury and subvert alloidal rights of the Sovereign Domain aka “personal space” or the right to privacy) has been found to be an illegal practice and such activities have rendered the Rothschild owned society guilty of Usury which is the practice our Coventry Common Law Court Authority has been formed to oust. I, Adam Yates, herein invoke the Essene Christ; Advocate and Most Wonderful Counsellor under the Right of Special Visitation to be heard in this matter. At Common Law the Public Recorder should enter this case as an alleged mistaken identity and adjudge it as a Public Nuisance since the creators of the trust were/are the Rothschild created fiat system. As history shows, all such systems fail hence the formation and actions of the One Peoples' Public Trust. Furthermore there is an outstanding unrebutted legal claim to the seat of the Vatican since one B. Marshall currently residing Mr Brian Leonard Golightly Marshall, 103 Northshore Avenue, Toogoom QLD Australia 4655, has provided family ancestry, astrological, mathematical, chromasomal scientific and computer confirmed optical datum as evidence of Himself to be the irrefutable incorporation of Jesus Christ reincarnate and the most Royal man alive by a British birth lineage, displaced to Australia due to the Cook voyage. Now He has now returned to reclaim His Throne in Rome. At Common Law, since these claims have not been rebutted, they stand as truth in law. Mr. Marshall's documents, I, Adam Yates, consider to be binding since tacit agreement may be found from the current Vatican Administration in their omission of a public declaration on Mr. Marshall's brief. https://www.dropbox.com/s/e9suw4hf48oni2x/Fax%20sent%20to%20ICC%20and%20the%20Australian%20High%20Court %20January%202015.pdf https://www.dropbox.com/s/wrch9lj4at43dj9/Roman%20Pontiff%20Emeritus%20Benedict%20XVI%20Apostolic%20Letter %20Signed.pdf https://www.dropbox.com/s/gsb3x815qd4g0zv/Vatican%20III.pdf This is not currently being reported on by any mainstream news outlets since those too are owned by the snake with two heads. Mr. Marshall's legally noticed document entitled VATICAN III is now my guide in full renunciation to involve myself with former cestui que vie allonge particulars such as yourselves as directed by Admiralty Insured Oleron Principles built around the Lex Rhodia, wherein I invoke right to eject the cargo, and; in Common Law I consider an Action of Devastatit against HMRC and all other national bodies, in particular the BBC and Houses of Parliament for their roles in the trafficking of narcotics, child sex commodities and procuration of funds for foreign wars under the Rothschild dynasty against the rules within RICO. You, acting on behalf of Her Majesty's Government CIK: 0001452617 c/o Davis Polk and Wardell, 99, Gresham Street London EC2V7NG X0 00000, IRS No.: 000000000, and; the United Kingdom Fund Inc. CIK: 0000732892, 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY10020, IRS No.: 133418823, SIC: 0000, both being situated as securities in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, are termed as 'unseated creditors' and if you continue to pester me then we will initiate action against yourselves under both 2007 Anti Money Laundering legislation as well as the Theft Act 1968 S.17 “false accounting” and attempting to gain money by deception (see relevant section) in the UK and under RICO 1977 in all other jurisdictions. The existence of the IRS itself was not ratified by Congress and represent the criminal organised gang behind the creation of the IRS Trust Funds in the Philippines and in Puerto Rico and The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, also created without Congress approval. http://www.usa-the-republic.com/revenue/BATF-IRS%20Criminal%20Report.html Thus a money laundering operation is in effect since revenue is attorned between a land mass and an island into trust funds. For you to continue contacting myself in these matters constitutes harassment at Common Law and charges against you personally FILE ON DEMAND [the reader] for psychiatric damages may arise at your own liability. I enclose a copy of my schedule for every further communication I am sent from you, my former Masters. Constitutionally, the Bill of Rights 1689, guarantees me that the threat of harm or loss over a monetary debt voids the debt, thus the debt, as you see it, is now settled under the British Constitution. The Forcible Entry Act 1381 forbids the raiding of the property at which I take up housekeeping under derivative entitlements under the Human Rights Acts that render the actions you are planning to be illegal in pursuit of a monetary debt in the first instance. There has been no public complaint made against me therefore no police report nor license granted by Clerk of Record for any forcible coercions exists meaning due process has been roundly sidestepped by the sending of the letters in the first place and their existence is evidence of fraud by menace posing as a public authority with impersonators of Police Constables as Enforcers, or common assault. Parliament of England Chapter 5 Ric 2 St 1 c 7 Repealing legislation The Criminal Law Act 1977, ss. 13(2)(a) & 65(5) & Sch. 13 Status: The Forcible Entry Act 1381 (5 Ric 2 St 1 c 7) was an Act of the Parliament of the Kingdom of England. It created a statutory offence of forcible entry which superseded the common law offence.[3] It is written in the Anglo-Norman language. It has been translated as follows: “And also the King defendeth, that none from henceforth make any entry into lands and tenements, but in case where entry is given by the law; and in such case not with strong hand, nor with multitude of people, but only in [peaceable][4] and easy manner. And if any man from henceforth do the contrary, and thereof be duly convict, he shall be punished by imprisonment.[5]” There were doubts about the interpretation of this Act. It has been suggested that the words translated as "that none from henceforth make any entry into lands and tenements, but in case where entry is given by the law" should be construed as making any unauthorised entry an offence, even where peaceful. It appears that this was not the intention of those responsible for the Act, and the courts did not at any time construe it that way.[6] Halsbury's Statutes, Third Edition, volume 18, page 405 1. The citation of this Act by this short title was authorised for the United Kingdom by section 5 of, and Schedule 2 to, the Statute Law Revision Act 1948. Due to the repeal of those provisions, it is now authorised by section 19(2) of the Interpretation Act 1978.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Squatting – the Real Story
    Squatters are usually portrayed as worthless scroungers hell-bent on disrupting society. Here at last is the inside story of the 250,000 people from all walks of life who have squatted in Britain over the past 12 years. The country is riddled with empty houses and there are thousands of homeless people. When squatters logically put the two together the result can be electrifying, amazing and occasionally disastrous. SQUATTING the real story is a unique and diverse account the real story of squatting. Written and produced by squatters, it covers all aspects of the subject: • The history of squatting • Famous squats • The politics of squatting • Squatting as a cultural challenge • The facts behind the myths • Squatting around the world and much, much more. Contains over 500 photographs plus illustrations, cartoons, poems, songs and 4 pages of posters and murals in colour. Squatting: a revolutionary force or just a bunch of hooligans doing their own thing? Read this book for the real story. Paperback £4.90 ISBN 0 9507259 1 9 Hardback £11.50 ISBN 0 9507259 0 0 i Electronic version (not revised or updated) of original 1980 edition in portable document format (pdf), 2005 Produced and distributed by Nick Wates Associates Community planning specialists 7 Tackleway Hastings TN34 3DE United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)1424 447888 Fax: +44 (0)1424 441514 Email: [email protected] Web: www.nickwates.co.uk Digital layout by Mae Wates and Graphic Ideas the real story First published in December 1980 written by Nick Anning by Bay Leaf Books, PO Box 107, London E14 7HW Celia Brown Set in Century by Pat Sampson Piers Corbyn Andrew Friend Cover photo by Union Place Collective Mark Gimson Printed by Blackrose Press, 30 Clerkenwell Close, London EC1R 0AT (tel: 01 251 3043) Andrew Ingham Pat Moan Cover & colour printing by Morning Litho Printers Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Meningitis: Immunizations on Pennsylvania College
    JOINT STATE GOVERNMENT COMMISSION General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania MENINGITIS: IMMUNIZATIONS ON PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES APRIL 2020 Serving the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Since 1937 - 1 - REPORT Meningitis: Immunizations on Pennsylvania College and University Campuses Project Manager: Susan Elder, Fiscal Analyst Allison Kobzowicz, Public Policy Analyst Stephen Kramer, Staff Attorney Project Staff: Wendy Baker, Executive Assistant Kahla Lukens, Administrative Assistant (Dec. 2019) Maureen Hartwell, Public Policy Analyst Intern (Aug. 2019) The report is also available at http://jsg.legis.state.pa.us - 0 - JOINT STATE GOVERNMENT COMMISSION Telephone: 717-787-4397 Room 108 Finance Building Fax: 717-783-9380 613 North Street E-mail: [email protected] Harrisburg, PA 17120-0108 Website: http://jsg.legis.state.pa.us The Joint State Government Commission was created in 1937 as the primary and central non- partisan, bicameral research and policy development agency for the General Assembly of Pennsylvania.1 A fourteen-member Executive Committee comprised of the leadership of both the House of Representatives and the Senate oversees the Commission. The seven Executive Committee members from the House of Representatives are the Speaker, the Majority and Minority Leaders, the Majority and Minority Whips, and the Majority and Minority Caucus Chairs. The seven Executive Committee members from the Senate are the President Pro Tempore, the Majority and Minority Leaders, the Majority and Minority Whips, and the Majority and Minority Caucus Chairs. By statute, the Executive Committee selects a chairman of the Commission from among the members of the General Assembly. Historically, the Executive Committee has also selected a Vice-Chair or Treasurer, or both, for the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Vaccines & Vaccination in India
    [Downloaded free from http://www.ijmr.org.in on Wednesday, August 26, 2020, IP: 14.139.60.52] Review Article Indian J Med Res 139, April 2014, pp 491-511 A brief history of vaccines & vaccination in India Chandrakant Lahariya Formerly Department of Community Medicine, G.R. Medical College, Gwalior, India Received December 31, 2012 The challenges faced in delivering lifesaving vaccines to the targeted beneficiaries need to be addressed from the existing knowledge and learning from the past. This review documents the history of vaccines and vaccination in India with an objective to derive lessons for policy direction to expand the benefits of vaccination in the country. A brief historical perspective on smallpox disease and preventive efforts since antiquity is followed by an overview of 19th century efforts to replace variolation by vaccination, setting up of a few vaccine institutes, cholera vaccine trial and the discovery of plague vaccine. The early twentieth century witnessed the challenges in expansion of smallpox vaccination, typhoid vaccine trial in Indian army personnel, and setting up of vaccine institutes in almost each of the then Indian States. In the post-independence period, the BCG vaccine laboratory and other national institutes were established; a number of private vaccine manufacturers came up, besides the continuation of smallpox eradication effort till the country became smallpox free in 1977. The Expanded Programme of Immunization (EPI) (1978) and then Universal Immunization Programme (UIP) (1985) were launched in India. The intervening events since UIP till India being declared non-endemic for poliomyelitis in 2012 have been described. Though the preventive efforts from diseases were practiced in India, the reluctance, opposition and a slow acceptance of vaccination have been the characteristic of vaccination history in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Law Act 1977
    Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Criminal Law Act 1977. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Criminal Law Act 1977 1977 CHAPTER 45 An Act to amend the law of England and Wales with respect to criminal conspiracy; to make new provision in that law, in place of the provisions of the common law and the Statutes of Forcible Entry, for restricting the use or threat of violence for securing entry into any premises and for penalising unauthorised entry or remaining on premises in certain circumstances; otherwise to amend the criminal law, including the law with respect to the administration of criminal justice; to provide for the alteration of certain pecuniary and other limits; to amend section 9(4) of the Administration of Justice Act 1973, the Legal Aid Act 1974, the Rabies Act 1974 and the Diseases of Animals (Northern Ireland) Order 1975 and the law about juries and coroners’ inquests; and for connected purposes. [29th July 1977] Annotations: Editorial Information X1 The text of ss. 1–5, 14–49, 57, 58, 60–65, Schs. 1–9, 11–14 was taken from S.I.F. Group 39:1 (Criminal Law: General), ss. 51, 63(2), 65(1)(3)(7)(10) from S.I.F. Group 39:2 ( Criminal Law: Public Safety and Order), ss. 53, 54, 65(1)(3)(7)(9)(10) Group 39:5 (Criminal Law: Sexual Offences and Obscenity), ss.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimes Act 1961
    Reprint as at 18 April 2012 Crimes Act 1961 Public Act 1961 No 43 Date of assent 1 November 1961 Commencement see section 1(2) Contents Page Title 23 1 Short Title, commencement, etc 23 2 Interpretation 24 3 Meaning of convicted on indictment 31 4 Meaning of ordinarily resident in New Zealand 31 Part 1 Jurisdiction 5 Application of Act 31 6 Persons not to be tried in respect of things done outside 32 New Zealand 7 Place of commission of offence 32 7A Extraterritorial jurisdiction in respect of certain offences 32 with transnational aspects 7B Attorney-General’s consent required where jurisdiction 34 claimed under section 7A 8 Jurisdiction in respect of crimes on ships or aircraft 35 beyond New Zealand Note Changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in this reprint. A general outline of these changes is set out in the notes at the end of this reprint, together with other explanatory material about this reprint. This Act is administered by the Ministry of Justice. 1 Reprinted as at Crimes Act 1961 18 April 2012 8A Jurisdiction in respect of certain persons with diplomatic 37 or consular immunity 9 Offences not to be punishable except under New Zealand 39 Acts 10 Offence under more than 1 enactment 39 10A Criminal enactments not to have retrospective effect 40 10B Period of limitation 40 11 Construction of other Acts 41 12 Summary jurisdiction 41 Part 2 Punishments 13 Powers of courts under other Acts not affected 41 Death [Repealed] 14 Form of sentence in capital cases [Repealed] 41
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    CHAPTER ONE: Introduction 1.1: General introduction Your Committee having carefully considered the Message of His Excellency the Lieutenant-Governor, and having also communicated with the principal Medical Practitioners in Hobart Town, Launceston, and other parts of the country, and ascertained their opinions as to the best mode of promoting vaccination, (which is admitted by all competent authorities to be extremely desirable, as affording the best protection against the ravages of that dreadful disease the Small-pox), have arrived at the unanimous conclusion that the most, if not the only effectual means of rendering vaccination general throughout the Island, will be by passing an Act of the Legislature imposing a pecuniary penalty on the parent or guardian of any child, above the age of six months and under that of fourteen years, who shall, without reasonable cause or excuse, be found after the 1st day of April next not to have been vaccinated.1 With this seemingly uncontroversial recommendation in September 1853, the chairman of the Tasmanian Select Committee on Smallpox and Colonial Secretary, William Champ, set into motion the first Compulsory Vaccination Act in the Australian colonies. Carefully considered in light of expert opinion and local conditions, it also represents an early instance of the extension of state authority into the private lives of citizens and an integral component of the development of public health in the colonies. The presence of smallpox in Sydney caused this exotic and terrible disease to appear immediately threatening, making the widespread implementation of preventive measures reasonable. When Champ was writing the above statement, vaccination was not a new technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7. Developments in Vaccination and Control Between
    CHAPTER 7 DEVELOPMENTS IN VACCINATION AND CONTROL BETWEEN 1900 AND 1966 Contents Page Introduction 277 Vaccine production and quality control before 1967 278 Production of vaccine lymph 279 Preparation of liquid vaccine 282 Preparation of dried vaccine 283 Quality control 289 Vaccination techniques before 1967 291 Vaccination site 291 Methods of vaccination 292 Age for primary vaccination 293 Interpretation of the results of vaccination 294 Complications of vaccination 296 Types of complication 299 Frequency of complications 302 Contraindications to vaccination 307 Prevention and treatment of complications 308 Reconsideration of vaccination policies in non-endemic countries 309 Complications : the overall picture 310 Programmes for vaccination and revaccination 311 Vaccination and revaccination of the general public 311 Simultaneous vaccination with several antigens 311 Vaccination of international travellers 312 INTRODUCTION The latter half of the 19th century saw the emergence of microbiology and immunology By the year 1900 vaccination was in as scientific disciplines . Because of their widespread use throughout the industrialized familiarity with vaccination, many of the countries as well as in some cities in what were pioneers in these new sciences used vaccinia then the colonies of various European virus for their studies (see Chapter 2) . In powers . Although variolation was no longer consequence, the empirical practices of Jenner practised in Europe and North America, it and his early followers were placed on a more was still widely employed in many parts of scientific basis . Vaccine production was no Africa and Asia . Smallpox persisted as an longer the province of the local physician, endemic disease in virtually every country of who had maintained the virus by arm-to-arm the world (see Chapter 8, Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassessing Vaccination in England, 1796-1853
    International Social Science Review Volume 95 Issue 3 Article 2 “A Splendid Delusion:” Reassessing Vaccination in England, 1796-1853 Kaitlyn Akel Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/issr Part of the Anthropology Commons, Communication Commons, Economics Commons, Geography Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Akel, Kaitlyn () "“A Splendid Delusion:” Reassessing Vaccination in England, 1796-1853," International Social Science Review: Vol. 95 : Iss. 3 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/issr/vol95/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Social Science Review by an authorized editor of Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. “A Splendid Delusion:” Reassessing Vaccination in England, 1796-1853 Cover Page Footnote Kaitlyn Akel holds a B.A. in History and a B.S. in Biology from the University of Arkansas, and is currently a MPH candidate at the University of Michigan School of Public Health. This article is available in International Social Science Review: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/issr/vol95/ iss3/2 Akel: “A Splendid Delusion:” Reassessing Vaccination in England, 1796-1853 “A Splendid Delusion:” Reassessing Vaccination in England, 1796-1853 Public health interventions integrate into our present-day habits to the point of imperceptibility. Policies revolve around our speed limits, employee sanitation standards, food preparation policies, immunization mandates: all with the encompassing intent to increase our fitness in society. This was not the case in nineteenth century England.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1: Issue 2
    VOLUME 1: ISSUE 2 || APRIL 2019 || Email: [email protected] Website:www.whiteblacklegal.co.in Page | 1 DISCLAIMER No part of this publication may be reproduced or copied in any form by any means without prior written permission of Editor-in-chief of WhiteBlackLegal – The Law Journal. The Editorial Team of WhiteBlackLegal holds the copyright to all articles contributed to this publication. The views expressed in this publication are purely personal opinions of the authors and do not reflect the views of the Editorial Team of WhiteBlackLegal or Legal Education Awareness Foundation. Though all efforts are made to ensure the accuracy and correctness of the information published, Jurisperitus shall not be responsible for any errors caused due to oversight or otherwise. Page | 2 EDITORIAL TEAM EDITOR IN CHIEF Name - Mr. Varun Agrawal Consultant || SUMEG FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT.LTD. Phone - +91-9990670288 Email - [email protected] EDITOR Name - Mr. Anand Agrawal Consultant|| SUMEG FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT.LTD. Phone - +91-9810767455 Email - [email protected] EDITOR (HONORARY) Name - Smt Surbhi Mittal Manager || PSU Phone - +91-9891639509 Email - [email protected] EDITOR(HONORARY) Name - Mr Praveen Mittal Consultant || United Health Group MNC Phone - +91-9891639509 Email - [email protected] EDITOR Name - Smt Sweety Jain Consultant||SUMEG FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT.LTD. Phone - +91-9990867660 Email - [email protected] EDITOR Name - Mr. Siddharth Dhawan Core Team Member || Legal Education Awareness Foundation Phone - +91 -9013078358 Page | 3 ABOUT US WHITEBLACKLEGAL is an open access, peer-reviewed and refereed journal provide dedicated to express views on topical legal issues, thereby generating a cross current of ideas on emerging matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Ltieorising Taw* Thesis Submitted for The
    ·Private and Public aspects of Trespass : Problems of 'ltieorising taW* by: P.c. Vincent-uones Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD Department of Law, Sheffield University October 1982 194 Ch. 5. Concrete p:trticular and concrete totality of law scecurirs relations of p?ssession and se~ration. (1) The concrete p:trticular (initial object): the ~l ri2ht to exclude. The concrete particular, and therefore the point of departure for con- crete analysis, is the ri9ht of the sUbject to exclude the world from interference with F?ssession of land. This is the simplest and most irreducible element of the law as it is expressed in a histor- ically determinate and socially constituted practice, at the concrete level of the Apparent movement and in the corresponding organization of legal categories •. This particular "right" is interp<;>latedwithin the structure of Society at a definite stage in its historical development in accord- ance with an economic determination yet to be specified. It may form the basis of legal claims by private individuals or non-human legal persons such as Corporations and Public Authorities (its limits are not exhaustively defined in its interpellation of human subjectsl). Yet its sphere of influence extends far beyond the resolution of dis- putes, informing the concrete practice of legal subjects in everday social situations: it is the foundation of the Company's exclusive control of production within the enterprise, and of the individual's reaction to intrusion: "Hey, you there, what do you think you're doing 1. Since not all legal subjects are "human", the mechanism of interpellation cannot completely account for their creation (requiring as it does a human "recognizing" subject.) [see Hirst, 1979/813] 195 in my garden?,,2 It is not necessary, to justify this starting-point, that legal sub- jects should "know" that their practice in relation to the possession of land is founded on this simple right, or that they be able to explain their attitudes by reference to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Laws Application Bill-98-1
    IMPERIAL LAWS APPLICATION BILL NOTE THIS Bill is being introduced in its present form so as to give notice of the legislation that it foreshadows to Parliament and to others whom it may concern, and to provide those who may be interested with an opportunity to make representations and suggestions in relation to the contemplated legislation at this early formative stage. It is not intended that the Bill should pass in its present form. Work towards completing and polishing the draft, and towards reviewing the Imperial enactments in force in New Zealand, is proceeding under the auspices of the Law Reform Council. It is intended to introduce a revised Bill in due course, and to allow ample time for study of the revised Bill and making representations thereon. The enactment of a definitive statutory list of Imperial subordinate legis- lation in force in New Zealand is contemplated. This list could appropriately be included in the revised Bill, but this course is not intended to be followed if it is likely to cause appreciable delay. Provision for the additional list can be made by a separate Bill. Representations in relation to the present Bill may be made in accordance with the normal practice to the Clerk of the Statutes Revision Committee of tlie House of Representatives. No. 98-1 Price $2.40 IMPERIAL LAWS APPLICATION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTE THIS Bill arises out of a review that is in process of being made by the Law Reform Council of the Imperial enactments in force in New Zealand. The intention is that in due course the present Bill will be allowed to lapse, and a complete revised Bill will be introduced to take its place.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeths Ii Regin^E
    IMPERIAL ACTS APPLICATION ACT. ANNO OCTAVO DECIMO ELIZABETHS II REGIN^E Act No. 30, 1969. An Act to provide that certain enactments of the Parliament of England and of the Parliament of Great Britain and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland in force in England at the time of the passing of the Imperial Act 9 George IV Chapter 83 shall continue in force in New South Wales; to replace other enactments of such Parliaments; to repeal other enactments of such Parliaments; to validate certain matters; and for purposes connected therewith. [Assented to, 9th April, 1969.] BE DE it enacted by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and Legislative Assembly of New South Wales in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: — PART I. PRELIMINARY. 1. (1) This Act may be cited as the "Imperial Acts Application Act, 1969". (2) This Act shall, except where otherwise expressly provided, commence upon a day to be appointed by the Governor and notified by proclamation in the Gazette. 2. This Act shall be read and construed subject to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act and so as not to exceed the legislative power of the State, to the intent that where any provision of this Act or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this Act and the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected. 3. This Act is divided into Parts and Divisions as follows :— PART I.—PRELIMINARY—ss.
    [Show full text]