DOCSLIB.ORG

Ltieorising Taw* Thesis Submitted for The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ltieorising Taw* Thesis Submitted for The ·Private and Public aspects of Trespass : Problems of 'ltieorising taW* by: P.c. Vincent-uones Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD Department of Law, Sheffield University October 1982 194 Ch. 5. Concrete p:trticular and concrete totality of law scecurirs relations of p?ssession and se~ration. (1) The concrete p:trticular (initial object): the ~l ri2ht to exclude. The concrete particular, and therefore the point of departure for con- crete analysis, is the ri9ht of the sUbject to exclude the world from interference with F?ssession of land. This is the simplest and most irreducible element of the law as it is expressed in a histor- ically determinate and socially constituted practice, at the concrete level of the Apparent movement and in the corresponding organization of legal categories •. This particular "right" is interp<;>latedwithin the structure of Society at a definite stage in its historical development in accord- ance with an economic determination yet to be specified. It may form the basis of legal claims by private individuals or non-human legal persons such as Corporations and Public Authorities (its limits are not exhaustively defined in its interpellation of human subjectsl). Yet its sphere of influence extends far beyond the resolution of dis- putes, informing the concrete practice of legal subjects in everday social situations: it is the foundation of the Company's exclusive control of production within the enterprise, and of the individual's reaction to intrusion: "Hey, you there, what do you think you're doing 1. Since not all legal subjects are "human", the mechanism of interpellation cannot completely account for their creation (requiring as it does a human "recognizing" subject.) [see Hirst, 1979/813] 195 in my garden?,,2 It is not necessary, to justify this starting-point, that legal sub- jects should "know" that their practice in relation to the possession of land is founded on this simple right, or that they be able to explain their attitudes by reference to it. It is sufficient that it exists, on the surface of Society, at the level of Appearances and in social practice, in the unproblematic assumption (however incoher- ent) of the right of exclude. This "right" is therefore a concrete rather than an abstract category. The fact that it has been identified by a process of reasoning, that it does not announce itself from the outset as obviously the correct point of departure, does not make it any less concrete. In observing the rigorous distinction between Scientific practice (Essential move- ment) and Social practice (Apparent movement), the simple "right to exclude" thus becomes the initial object of scientific Abstraction3; however irreducible at the level of the concrete, this object never- theless remains a "chaotic whole", precisely by virtue of its concret- eness, and Abstraction must perform the role of revealing its constit- uent elements, the real social and economic relations that underlie and determine it. Whilst it is clear that there can be no question of beginning with "general and abstract determinants obtaining in more or less all forms of society", or with a particular abstract such as "possession" or the 2. [see Althusser (1971) p. 163] Here human individuals are indeed "interpellated", ideology being the medium through which they may "live" a relation to their real conditions of existence. 3. see supra. (Ch. 4.) 196 "subject" (as is the case with pashukanis),4 the concrete "right to exclude" is just one amongst a number of concretes that might equally have served as the point of departure, and whose particular selection must therefore be defended.5 Indeed, the concrete legal "subject" (understood concretely contra. Pashukanis) would have the advantage of being concrete in the tangible sense in which the commodity is concrete, whereas the "right" is of an altogether different and more ethereal character. Nevertheless, the criterion of "concreteness" is satisfied in the socially constituted nature of legal practice, and need not require a literally concrete object. The crucial question is which of these alternatives is the most irreducible, and most likely to provide a basis for the development of theoretical determinations which will ultimately reveal the essence of the law of Trespass. Three observations may be made at this stage of the analysis: (1) The "right to exclude" is more prominent at the level of the Apparent movement than the "subject" of that right; persons may "know their rights" without conceiving of themselves as "legal sub- jects". In other words, the language of "rights" provides an Import> ant medium, for human individuals, through which they are able to live a relation to their real conditions of existence. It is an everyday ideology forming the spontaneous consciousness of social agents - and this is precisely the level of Appearances at which the analysis must begin. (2) The "right to exclude" can also be shown to be a more 4. ••••• starting with an analysis of the legal form in its "most abstract and pure shape" : see Ch. 4. Section V. (supra.) 5. Similarly Marx abandoned the abstract categories of Labour and Value at the end of 1857, but had yet to determine which particular concrete would constitute his starting-point (see supra Ch. 4. Section II. 197 simple and a less problematic, starting point. Whilst a variety of quite different legal subjects may share the same basic "right to exclude", to begin with a unitary subject of that right would raise the problem of how such a "subject" should be conceived (in Production or Consumption, as human or non-human, as tenant, wage-labourer or Corporation?) thus risking a crucial reduction from the outset. There is also the problem of the relation between the legal subject and the socio-economic subject (can the former be considered in abstraction from the latter?), whereas the legal right exists logically quite independently of an~ particular subject. What is most fundamental is thus the right to exclude - the different categories of social agent constituted as the bearers of this right being a matter for secondary consideration.6 (3) The analy~ical departure from the "right to exclude" best enables the necessary transition from Apparent movement to Essential movement, ensuring the most theoretically productive transition from concrete to abstract concepts.7 Ca) Trespass: an equal ri2ht. The "right to exclude", like Marx's Corrmodity, appears at first sight an extremely obvious, trivial thing. But it is precisely this natural and unassuming appearance that has to be explained. To begin with, this "right" does not exist in a vacuum, but must have some function and reference outside itself. Of what elements may this concrete whole be said to consist? What role does it perform? The "right" 6. These points are elaborated in the course of this Chapter, and should become still clearer in Ch.6. 7. cf. Echeverria supra Ch. 4. section IV. 198 only makes sense as the pro~rt¥ of socio-economic subjects, whose relations are governed precisely by a framework of rights and obliga- tions. Beneath this form of "right" are concealed an almost infinite number and considerable variety of different subjects; what they have in common is "ownership" of the identical right. Considered apart from such shared "rights", however, subjects are merely heteronomous socio-economic atoms; it is specifically legal rights that give them unity by providing something in which they can share. Thus human socio-economic subjects have quite different capacities, powers, attributes and abili.ties, but their particularity is lost in the shadow of "right", and the same may be said of non-human subjects such as business enterprises and units of Public Administration. Besides the differences between subjects of the same type, there is a distinc- tion to be drawn between the various kinds of socio-economic subject: that human individuals, enterprises and public corporations have the same universal "right to exclude" serves to obscure the heterogeneity of essentially different subjects with different characteristics and capacities. The "right to exclude" creates socio-economic sUbjects in its own imase as lesal sUbjects of that risht; hence the over-determined status of these subjects as legal subjects (be they juridical individuals, joint-stock companies or Corporations) with the right of exclusive possession.8 Since all subjects unite under the banner of the "right to exclude", all sUbjects are e9ual in respect of this right, and hence it is 8. of course Trespass is merely one amongst a number of areas of Law - private, public and criminal - interpolated within the fabric of society and defining the practices of socio-economic subjects. Quite specific legal elements constitute non-human, as opposed to human, legal subjects - nevertheless the effectivity of Trespass in relation to all such subjects remains. 199 an equal right within the juridical meaning of "equality": all sub- jects have an equal right to exclude all other subjects from interfer- ence with their possession of land. With this recognition the analysis is returned, with the results so far achieved through abstraction, to the level of the concrete, where the simple "right" which formed the irreducible point of departure is confirmed in its dimension of equality. Thus the analysis is conducted in relation to a historically determin- ate and particular right, that of "exclusion from interference with possession of land", in the form in which it appears in contemporary social practice at the very moment of analysis. The dimension of "equality" is not "logically deduced" from an essential and abstract right, rather it is discovered as an aspect of a practically constitu- ted and concrete object through a process of scientific abstraction. This quality is not of course unique to the particular "right to exclude", but a crucial component of every bourgeois right.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kennington Parkpark Thethe Birthplacebirthplace Ofof People’Speople’S Democracydemocracy
    KenningtonKennington ParkPark TheThe BirthplaceBirthplace ofof People’sPeople’s DemocracyDemocracy StefanStefan SzczelkunSzczelkun KenningtonKennington ParkPark TheThe BirthplaceBirthplace ofof People’sPeople’s DemocracyDemocracy StefanStefan SzczelkunSzczelkun past tense Published by past tense Originally published 1997. Second edition 2005. This (third) edition 2018. past tense c/o 56a Infoshop 56 Crampton Street, London. SE17 3AE email: [email protected] More past tense texts and other material can be f ound at http://www.past-tense.org.uk http://pasttenseblog.wordpress.com https: twitter.com/@_pasttense_ https: www.facebook.com/pastensehistories The Birthplace of People’s Democracy A short one hundred and fifty years ago Kennington Common, later to be renamed Kennington Park, was host to a historic gathering which can now be seen as the birth of modern British democracy. In reaction to this gathering, the great Chartist rally of 10th April 1848, the common was forcibly enclosed and the Victorian Park was built to occupy the site. History is not objective truth. It is a selection of some facts from a mass of evidences to construct a particular view, which inevitably, reflects the ideas of the historian and their social milieu. The history most of us learnt in school left out the stories of most of the people who lived and made that history. If the design of the Victorian park means anything it is a negation of such a people’s history: an enforced amnesia of what the real Kennington Common, looking South, in 1839. On the right is the Horns Tavern; in the distance on the left is St. Marks Church. 1 importance of this space is about.
    [Show full text]
  • FELIX Newspaper of Imperial College Union 12Th December, 1972
    FELIX Newspaper of Imperial College Union 12th December, 1972 (Seasonal QteetWQs! INSIDE: Free Gift for you to keep; News; Reviews; lots of political comment; Lots of letters; lots of other things, including Phosphorous the )obrot & Ferocious Din and the landsnapper Sneeze December 12, 1972 Page 2 FELIX Action called for Community Action Group against Southside CHRISTMAS APPEAL job security threat Wanted: Only fifteen people turned up to Thursday's SocSoc meeting where OLD CLOTHES FOOD Brian Grogan (of Red Mole) talked about the Wage Freeze and two (and shoes and boots) (tea, coffee, sugar, powdered milk, tinned National Union of Public Employees (NUPE) shop stewards talked food, cigarettes, sweets, chocolate . .) JUMBLE about the job security threat to Southside cleaners. ETC. Two shop stewards of freeze was through united belief that the first neces TOYS (paper cups, books, blankets . .) NUPE, who work as Mes- workers' action while they sity was the defeat of sengers in the College, are still in this strong and the Tories. He was also spoke on the administra- united position. adamant that a campaign tion's plan to reduce the He went on to a de- for "Labour Government for: cleaning staff in Southside tailed discussion of the committed to Socialist through "natural wast- relative policies of the policies" as put forward KIDS age". Andy O'Brien, Elec- Communist Party, and the by workers press was to- Marylands Adventure Playground in North Paddington was originally set up with trical Engineering messen- -International Marxist tally useless. His lengthy funds from an l.C. Rag. The Playgroup is desperately short of money so a ger said that both the Group on the overthrow discourse on the latter Winter Carnival with a jumble stall, bonfire, visit from father Christmas, etc., workers and the students of capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Squatting – the Real Story
    Squatters are usually portrayed as worthless scroungers hell-bent on disrupting society. Here at last is the inside story of the 250,000 people from all walks of life who have squatted in Britain over the past 12 years. The country is riddled with empty houses and there are thousands of homeless people. When squatters logically put the two together the result can be electrifying, amazing and occasionally disastrous. SQUATTING the real story is a unique and diverse account the real story of squatting. Written and produced by squatters, it covers all aspects of the subject: • The history of squatting • Famous squats • The politics of squatting • Squatting as a cultural challenge • The facts behind the myths • Squatting around the world and much, much more. Contains over 500 photographs plus illustrations, cartoons, poems, songs and 4 pages of posters and murals in colour. Squatting: a revolutionary force or just a bunch of hooligans doing their own thing? Read this book for the real story. Paperback £4.90 ISBN 0 9507259 1 9 Hardback £11.50 ISBN 0 9507259 0 0 i Electronic version (not revised or updated) of original 1980 edition in portable document format (pdf), 2005 Produced and distributed by Nick Wates Associates Community planning specialists 7 Tackleway Hastings TN34 3DE United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)1424 447888 Fax: +44 (0)1424 441514 Email: [email protected] Web: www.nickwates.co.uk Digital layout by Mae Wates and Graphic Ideas the real story First published in December 1980 written by Nick Anning by Bay Leaf Books, PO Box 107, London E14 7HW Celia Brown Set in Century by Pat Sampson Piers Corbyn Andrew Friend Cover photo by Union Place Collective Mark Gimson Printed by Blackrose Press, 30 Clerkenwell Close, London EC1R 0AT (tel: 01 251 3043) Andrew Ingham Pat Moan Cover & colour printing by Morning Litho Printers Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • VICTORIA LAW FOUNDATION LAW ORATION Banco Court, Supreme
    VICTORIA LAW FOUNDATION LAW ORATION Banco Court, Supreme Court of Victoria —21 July 2016 OF MOZART, MODERN DRAFTING AND THE CRIMINAL LAWYERS’ LAMENT Justice Mark Weinberg1 1 May I begin by thanking the Victoria Law Foundation for having organised this evening’s event. It is an honour to have been invited to speak to you tonight. I am, of course, conscious of the fact that among previous presenters in this series have been a number of great legal luminaries. 2 I have no doubt that some of you have come here this evening for one reason only. That is to see how, if at all, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, perhaps the greatest musical genius of all time, can legitimately be linked to a subject as soporific as modern drafting, still less to a subject as parochial as the ongoing grievances of the criminal bar. 3 There will be cynics among you who believe that I have included Mozart in the title of this paper simply to bolster the attendance tonight. As I hope to demonstrate, you are mistaken. You will have to wait in order to find out why. 4 As the Munchkins said to Dorothy, ‘It is always best to start at the beginning’. In my case, that was as a law student, almost exactly 50 years ago. It was then, under the expert guidance of a great teacher, Professor Louis Waller, that I first came across the tragic tale of Messrs Dudley and Stephens, and the events surrounding the shipwreck of the yacht Mignonette. Since that time, I have been both intrigued and fascinated by the criminal law.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Law: Conspiracy to Defraud
    CRIMINAL LAW: CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD LAW COMMISSION LAW COM No 228 The Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 228) CRIMINAL LAW: CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD Item 5 of the Fourth Programme of Law Reform: Criminal Law Laid before Parliament bj the Lord High Chancellor pursuant to sc :tion 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 6 December 1994 LONDON: 11 HMSO E10.85 net The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Brooke, Chairman Professor Andrew Burrows Miss Diana Faber Mr Charles Harpum Mr Stephen Silber QC The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London, WClN 2BQ. 11 LAW COMMISSION CRIMINAL LAW: CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD CONTENTS Paragraph Page PART I: INTRODUCTION 1.1 1 A. Background to the report 1. Our work on conspiracy generally 1.2 1 2. Restrictions on charging conspiracy to defraud following the Criminal Law Act 1977 1.8 3 3. The Roskill Report 1.10 4 4. The statutory reversal of Ayres 1.11 4 5. Law Commission Working Paper No 104 1.12 5 6. Developments in the law after publication of Working Paper No 104 1.13 6 7. Our subsequent work on the project 1.14 6 B. A general review of dishonesty offences 1.16 7 C. Summary of our conclusions 1.20 9 D.
    [Show full text]
  • “We Don't Have Leaders! We're Doing It Ourselves
    129 ISSN: 1755-068 www.field-journal.org vol.7 (1) “We don’t have leaders! We’re doing it ourselves!”: Squatting, Feminism and Built Environment Activism in 1970s London. Christine Wall The Feminist Design Collective, which later became the feminist architecture practice and discussion group Matrix, was founded by a group of women architects in London in 1978. It aimed to develop a feminist approach to all aspects of architectural production and also to wider built environment issues. A significant number of founder members were living in squats or short-life housing in response to a housing crisis, which emerged in the late 1960s, and as political statement against housing inequality. By the mid- 1970s London housed over 30,000 squatters, the majority in nineteenth century terraces owned by local authorities and earmarked either for demolition or rehabilitation, and which became vacant during prolonged planning and funding negotiations. In the 1980s squatting became regulated by a number of progressive Inner London Authorities as a way of mediating housing shortage and small grants were made available to organised groups of squatters for repairs. These large numbers of squatters were connected in what Vasudevan (2017) has termed ‘a radical urban social movement’. This paper uses oral history testimony to reveal a link between squatting, which allowed women to directly engage with and shape the physical fabric of their housing, and the emergence of feminist architectural theories and practice in late twentieth century Britain. 130 www.field-journal.org vol.7 (1) Introduction Squatting has long been a response to both housing need and social injustice.
    [Show full text]
  • Felix Issue 270, 1969
    IMPERIAL COLLEGE UNION NO. 284 20th NOVEMBER, 1969 6(1. Did You Know? This years' Carnival is for ing between eleven and mid- Out of Isolation the Society for Mentally night on the 5th of Decem- Handicapped Children and ber. Those arriving back Carnival has already col- sore of foot and parched of I.G.U. Votes to Rejoin N.U.S. lected some money ! ? Guilds thirst will be greeted by girls is doing phenomenally well, of Maria Assumpta bearing having collected more than breakfasts. A Darts Mara- At the first Union Meet- asked for someone to speak image. Only through being more so. He asked if four £270, including £150 from thon is also among events ing to toe held in the new against the motion. No one members of a national union hundred students at a Union the Lord Mayor's Show and proposed for that week so Great Hall in College Block, stirred. Disbelief among old could I.C. Union make an meeting could accurately re- most of the rest at the what about volunteers from indeed the first massed hands at I.C., for this peren- impression on national stu- flect the feelings of the whole Guilds - Mines terrifying the Union Bar. gathering in that noble nial motion has provided dent affairs such as these. of Imperial College on this tiddly - winks tournament. place, the Union voted in grist to the mill of I.C. de- Blasting away through the issue. A deep question which R.C.S. also did well out of A successful Albert Hall favour of rejoining the Na- baters for donkeys years.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonlinearity, Autonomy and Resistant Law
    Draft - in Webb, T. and Wheatley, S. (Eds.) Complexity Theory & Law: Mapping an Emergent Jurisprudence, Law, Science and Society Series (Routledge, Forthcoming) 11 Nonlinearity, autonomy and resistant law Lucy Finchett-Maddock* It can be a little difficult to plot a timeline of social centres when you’re dealing outside of linear time. – Interviewee from rampART collective, 2009 in Finchett-Maddock (2016, p. 168) This chapter argues that informal and communal forms of law, such as that of social centres, occupy and enact a form of spatio-temporal ‘nonlinear informality’, as opposed to a reified linearity of state law that occurs as a result of institutionalising processes of private property. Complexity theory argues the existence of both linear and nonlinear systems, whether they be regarding time, networks or otherwise. Working in an understanding of complexity theory framework to describe the spatio-temporality of law, all forms of law are argued as nonlinear, dependent on the role of uncertainty within supposedly linear and nonlinear systems and the processes of entropy in the emergence of law. ‘Supposedly’ linear, as in order for state law to assert its authority, it must become institutionalised, crystallising material architectures, customs and symbols that we know and recognise to be law. Its appearance is argued as linear as a result of institutionalisation, enabled by the elixir of individual private property and linear time as the congenital basis of its authority. But linear institutionalisation does not account for the role of uncertainty (resistance or resistant laws) within the shaping of law and demonstrates state law’s violent totalitarianism through institutionalising absolute time.
    [Show full text]
  • King Mob Echo: from Gordon Riots to Situationists & Sex Pistols
    KING MOB ECHO FROM 1780 GORDON RIOTS TO SITUATIONISTS SEX PISTOLS AND BEYOND BY TOM VAGUE INCOMPLETE WORKS OF KING MOB WITH ILLUSTRATIONS IN TWO VOLUMES DARK STAR LONDON ·- - � --- Printed by Polestar AUP Aberdeen Limited, Rareness Rd., Altens Industrial Estate, Aberdeen AB12 3LE § 11JJJDJJDILIEJMIIENf1r 1f(Q) KIINCGr JMI(Q)IB3 JECCIHI(Q) ENGLISH SECTION OF THE SITUATIONIST INTERNATIONAL IF([J)IF ffiIE V ([J) IL lUilII ([J) W §IFIEIEIIJ) IHIII§il([J) ffiY ADDITIONAL RESEARCH BY DEREK HARRIS AND MALCOLM HOPKINS Illustrations: 'The Riots in Moorfields' (cover), 'The London Riots', 'at Langdale's' by 'Phiz' Hablot K. Browne, Horwood's 1792-9 'Plan of London', 'The Great Rock'n'Roll Swindle', 'Oliver Twist Manifesto' by Malcolm McLaren. Vagrants and historical shout outs: Sandra Belgrave, Stewart Home, Mark Jackson, Mark Saunders, Joe D. Stevens at NDTC, Boz & Phiz, J. Paul de Castro, Blue Bredren, Cockney Visionaries, Dempsey, Boss Goodman, Lord George Gordon, Chris Gray, Jonathon Green, Jefferson Hack, Christopher Hibbert, Hoppy, Ian Gilmour, Ish, Dzifa & Simone at The Grape, Barry Jennings, Joe Jones, Shaun Kerr, Layla, Lucas, Malcolm McLaren, John Mead, Simon Morrissey, Don Nicholson-Smith, Michel Prigent (pre-publicity), Charlie Radcliffe, Jamie Reid, George Robertson & Melinda Mash, Dragan Rad, George Rude, Naveen Saleh, Jon Savage, Valerie Solanas, Carolyn Starren & co at Kensington Library, Mark Stewart, Toko, Alex Trocchi, Fred & Judy Vermorel, Warren, Dr. Watson, Viv Westwood, Jack Wilkes, Dave & Stuart Wise Soundtrack: 'It's a London Thing' Scott Garcia, 'Going Mobile' The Who, 'Living for the City' Stevie Wonder, 'Boston Tea Party' Alex Harvey, 'Catholic Day' Adam and the Ants, 'Do the Strand' Roxy Music', 'Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Law Act 1977
    Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Criminal Law Act 1977. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Criminal Law Act 1977 1977 CHAPTER 45 An Act to amend the law of England and Wales with respect to criminal conspiracy; to make new provision in that law, in place of the provisions of the common law and the Statutes of Forcible Entry, for restricting the use or threat of violence for securing entry into any premises and for penalising unauthorised entry or remaining on premises in certain circumstances; otherwise to amend the criminal law, including the law with respect to the administration of criminal justice; to provide for the alteration of certain pecuniary and other limits; to amend section 9(4) of the Administration of Justice Act 1973, the Legal Aid Act 1974, the Rabies Act 1974 and the Diseases of Animals (Northern Ireland) Order 1975 and the law about juries and coroners’ inquests; and for connected purposes. [29th July 1977] Annotations: Editorial Information X1 The text of ss. 1–5, 14–49, 57, 58, 60–65, Schs. 1–9, 11–14 was taken from S.I.F. Group 39:1 (Criminal Law: General), ss. 51, 63(2), 65(1)(3)(7)(10) from S.I.F. Group 39:2 ( Criminal Law: Public Safety and Order), ss. 53, 54, 65(1)(3)(7)(9)(10) Group 39:5 (Criminal Law: Sexual Offences and Obscenity), ss.
    [Show full text]
  • Statute Law Revision 17Th Report (SLC 193; LC 285)
    [Coat of Arms] The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM No 285) (SCOT LAW COM No 193) STATUTE LAW REVISION: SEVENTEENTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL Report on a Reference under Section 3(1)(e) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Presented to the Parliament of the United Kingdom by the Lord High Chancellor by Command of Her Majesty Laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers December 2003 Cm 6070 SE/2003/313 £xx.xx The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Toulson, Chairman Professor Hugh Beale QC Mr Stuart Bridge Professor Martin Partington CBE Judge Alan Wilkie QC The Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1N 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Eassie, Chairman Professor Gerard Maher QC Professor Kenneth G C Reid Professor Joseph M Thomson Mr Colin J Tyre QC The Secretary of the Scottish Law Commission is Miss Jane L McLeod and its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. The terms of this report were agreed on 17 November 2003. The text of this report is available on the Internet at: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk ii LAW COMMISSION SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REVISION: SEVENTEENTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL CONTENTS Paragraph Page REPORT 1 APPENDIX 1: DRAFT
    [Show full text]
  • Fourteenth Report: Draft Statute Law Repeals Bill
    The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 211) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 140) STATUTE LAW REVISION: FOURTEENTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL Presented to Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor and the Lord Advocate by Command of Her Majesty April 1993 LONDON: HMSO E17.85 net Cm 2176 The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the Law. The Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Mr. Justice Brooke, Chairman Mr Trevor M. Aldridge, Q.C. Mr Jack Beatson Mr Richard Buxton, Q.C. Professor Brenda Hoggett, Q.C. The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Collon. Its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WClN 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Lord Davidson, Chairman .. Dr E.M. Clive Professor P.N. Love, C.B.E. Sheriff I.D.Macphail, Q.C. Mr W.A. Nimmo Smith, Q.C. The Secretary of the Scottish Law Commission is Mr K.F. Barclay. Its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. .. 11 THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REVISION: FOURTEENTH REPORT Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill To the Right Honourable the Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, and the Right Honourable the Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Q.C., Her Majesty's Advocate. In pursuance of section 3(l)(d) of the Law Commissions Act 1965, we have prepared the draft Bill which is Appendix 1 and recommend that effect be given to the proposals contained in it.
    [Show full text]