A Brief History of Vaccines & Vaccination in India
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Why Is India Having a Covid-19 Surge? India’S Infections Set New Pandemic Records in April, with More Than 300 000 Positive Tests Each Day for a Week
NEWS Tamil Nadu, India NEWS ANALYSIS BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.n1124 on 30 April 2021. Downloaded from Cite this as: BMJ 2021;373:n1124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1124 Published: 30 April 2021 Why is India having a covid-19 surge? India’s infections set new pandemic records in April, with more than 300 000 positive tests each day for a week. Kamala Thiagarajan looks at the many unanswered questions Kamala Thiagarajan On 26 April India saw the highest daily tally of new the long running shortage of emergency healthcare SARS-CoV-2 infections ever recorded in the world, and lack of professionals: the ratio of doctors to 360 960, taking its pandemic total to 16 million cases, patients was recorded as 1:1445 and of hospital beds second only to the US, and more than 200 000 deaths. to people 0.7:1000, with a ventilator to population ratio of 40 000 to 1.3 billion. The devastating second wave comes a year after the country imposed one of the most rigid lockdown In the latest crisis, medical supplies and oxygen are restrictions in the world—and just three months since being shipped in from 15 countries and international its health ministry declared that infections and aid organisations such as Unicef. Devi Prakash mortality were at an all time low.1 Shetty, a cardiac surgeon and chairman and founder of the Narayana Health chain of medical centres, has What is causing India’s second wave, and why estimated that India would need about 500 000 ICU is it so much worse than the first? beds and 350 000 medical staff in the next few weeks. -
Determinants of Childhood Immunisation Coverage in Urban Poor Settlements of Delhi, India: a Cross-Sectional Study
Open Access Research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013015 on 26 August 2016. Downloaded from Determinants of childhood immunisation coverage in urban poor settlements of Delhi, India: a cross-sectional study Niveditha Devasenapathy,1 Suparna Ghosh Jerath,1 Saket Sharma,1 Elizabeth Allen,2 Anuraj H Shankar,3 Sanjay Zodpey1 To cite: Devasenapathy N, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Ghosh Jerath S, Sharma S, Objectives: Aggregate data on childhood et al. Determinants of immunisation from urban settings may not reflect the ▪ childhood immunisation We report current estimates of childhood com- coverage among the urban poor. This study provides coverage in urban plete immunisation including hepatitis B vaccine poor settlements of Delhi, information on complete childhood immunisation coverage from representative urban poor com- India: a cross-sectional study. coverage among the urban poor, and explores its munities in the Southeast of Delhi. BMJ Open 2016;6:e013015. household and neighbourhood-level determinants. ▪ The sample size was large and therefore our doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016- Setting: Urban poor community in the Southeast effect estimates for coverage and determinants 013015 district of Delhi, India. were precise. Participants: We randomly sampled 1849 children ▪ We quantify unknown neighbourhood effects on ▸ Prepublication history and aged 1–3.5 years from 13 451 households in 39 this outcome using median ORs which are more additional material is clusters (cluster defined as area covered by a intuitively understood. available. To view please visit community health worker) in 2 large urban poor ▪ Based on the data, representative of only one the journal (http://dx.doi.org/ settlements. -
IAP Textbook of VACCINES
IAP Textbook of VACCINES A Publication of Indian Academy of Pediatrics Disclaimer The views expressed by the authors on different vaccines and issues pertaining to immunization shall be considered as their own personal opinions. They should not be construed or cited as official stand of the Indian Academy of Pediatrics. IAP Textbook of VACCINES Editor-in-Chief Vipin M Vashishtha MD FIAP Director and Consultant Pediatrician Mangla Hospital and Research Center Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh, India Editors Rohit Agrawal MBBS DCH MD TU Sukumaran MD DCH MNAMS Director, Chandrajyoti Children’s Hospital, Mumbai Professor, Department of Pediatrics Consultant Pediatrician, Kohinoor Hospital Institute of Child Health and Children Hospital Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India Academic Editors Nitin K Shah MBBS MD DCH Naveen Thacker MD FIAP Consultant Pediatric Hematoncologist Director, Deep Children Hospital and Research Center PD Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Center Head, Department of Pediatrics, Sahyadri Ramkrishna Specialty Hospital Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Kutch, Gujarat, India Panna Choudhury MBBS DCH MD FIAP FIMSA FRSTMH FAMS Vijay N Yewale MD DCH Consultant Pediatrician Consultant Vice Chairman, Child Health Foundation Dr Yewale Multispecialty Hospital for Children Executive Director, Indian Academy of Pediatrics Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India New Delhi, India Associate Editors CP Bansal MD PD DAP FIAP A Parthasarathy MD DCH MNAMS Director and Consultant Pediatrician Senior Consultant -
Meningitis: Immunizations on Pennsylvania College
JOINT STATE GOVERNMENT COMMISSION General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania MENINGITIS: IMMUNIZATIONS ON PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES APRIL 2020 Serving the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Since 1937 - 1 - REPORT Meningitis: Immunizations on Pennsylvania College and University Campuses Project Manager: Susan Elder, Fiscal Analyst Allison Kobzowicz, Public Policy Analyst Stephen Kramer, Staff Attorney Project Staff: Wendy Baker, Executive Assistant Kahla Lukens, Administrative Assistant (Dec. 2019) Maureen Hartwell, Public Policy Analyst Intern (Aug. 2019) The report is also available at http://jsg.legis.state.pa.us - 0 - JOINT STATE GOVERNMENT COMMISSION Telephone: 717-787-4397 Room 108 Finance Building Fax: 717-783-9380 613 North Street E-mail: [email protected] Harrisburg, PA 17120-0108 Website: http://jsg.legis.state.pa.us The Joint State Government Commission was created in 1937 as the primary and central non- partisan, bicameral research and policy development agency for the General Assembly of Pennsylvania.1 A fourteen-member Executive Committee comprised of the leadership of both the House of Representatives and the Senate oversees the Commission. The seven Executive Committee members from the House of Representatives are the Speaker, the Majority and Minority Leaders, the Majority and Minority Whips, and the Majority and Minority Caucus Chairs. The seven Executive Committee members from the Senate are the President Pro Tempore, the Majority and Minority Leaders, the Majority and Minority Whips, and the Majority and Minority Caucus Chairs. By statute, the Executive Committee selects a chairman of the Commission from among the members of the General Assembly. Historically, the Executive Committee has also selected a Vice-Chair or Treasurer, or both, for the Commission. -
Analysis of the Universal Immunization Programme and Introduction
Vaccine 32S (2014) A151–A161 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Vaccine j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/vaccine Analysis of the Universal Immunization Programme and introduction of a rotavirus vaccine in India with IndiaSim a a,b a c Itamar Megiddo , Abigail R. Colson , Arindam Nandi , Susmita Chatterjee , d e a,b,c,∗ Shankar Prinja , Ajay Khera , Ramanan Laxminarayan a Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy, Washington, DC, USA b Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA c Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India d School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India e Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India a b s t r a c t Background and objectives: India has the highest under-five death toll globally, approximately 20% of which is attributed to vaccine-preventable diseases. India’s Universal Immunization Programme (UIP) is working both to increase immunization coverage and to introduce new vaccines. Here, we analyze the disease and financial burden alleviated across India’s population (by wealth quintile, rural or urban area, and state) through increasing vaccination rates and introducing a rotavirus vaccine. Methods: We use IndiaSim, a simulated agent-based model (ABM) of the Indian population (including socio-economic characteristics and immunization status) and the health system to model three interventions. In the first intervention, a rotavirus vaccine is introduced at the current DPT3 immunization coverage level in India. In the second intervention, coverage of three doses of rotavirus and DPT and one dose of the measles vaccine are increased to 90% randomly across the population. -
Book Review: 'Till We
INDIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH / VOL 32 / ISSUE NO 04 / OCT – DEC 2020 [Till We Win…] | Kakkar R et al BOOK REVIEW Book Review: ‘Till We Win - India’s fight against the COVID-19 Pandemic’ Rakesh Kakkar1, Pradeep Aggarwal2 1Professor & Head, Department of Community & Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh 522503; 2Associate Professor, Department of Community & Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand 249203 Corresponding Author Dr Pradeep Aggarwal, Associate Professor, Department of Community & Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand 249203 E Mail ID: [email protected] Citation Kakkar R, Aggarwal P. Book Review: ‘Till We Win- India’s fight against the COVID-19 Pandemic’. Indian J Comm Health. 2020; 32(4): 755-756. https://doi.org/10.47203/IJCH.2020.v32i04.028 Source of Funding: Nil Conflict of Interest: None Article Cycle Received: 21/12/2020; Revision: 24/12/2020; Accepted: 29/12/2020; Published: 31/12/2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The book has four sections and eleven chapters. The first section focuses upon why viruses are likely to cause pandemic and how human activities are increasing the risks of outbreaks and epidemics. The second section deliberates on India’s pandemic response and how the policies and strategies had evolved, with every emerging situation. The authors argue that no country was fully prepared to respond to the pandemic of such a magnitude, which has disrupted nearly every ‘health system’, across the world. Third section covers what people need to know and understand about the COVID-19 vaccines and therapies. -
Inactivated Japanese Encephalitis Virus Vaccine
January 8, 1993 / Vol. 42 / No. RR-1 CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION Recommendations and Reports Inactivated Japanese Encephalitis Virus Vaccine Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Atlanta, Georgia 30333 The MMWR series of publications is published by the Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Public Health Service, U.S. Depart- ment of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia 30333. SUGGESTED CITATION Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Inactivated Japanese encephalitis vi- rus vaccine. Recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP). MMWR 1993;42(No. RR-1):[inclusive page numbers]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention .................... William L. Roper, M.D., M.P.H. Director The material in this report was prepared for publication by: National Center for Infectious Diseases..................................James M. Hughes, M.D. Director Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases ........................Duane J. Gubler, Sc.D. Director The production of this report as an MMWR serial publication was coordinated in: Epidemiology Program Office.................................... Stephen B. Thacker, M.D., M.Sc. Director Richard A. Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Editor, MMWR Series Scientific Information and Communications Program Recommendations and Reports ................................... Suzanne M. Hewitt, M.P.A. Managing Editor Sharon D. Hoskins Project Editor Rachel J. Wilson Editorial Trainee Peter M. Jenkins Visual Information Specialist Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Public Health Service or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. -
Why Is the Vaccination Rate Low in India?
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.21.21250216; this version posted February 18, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Why is the Vaccination Rate Low in India? First Version: 21st January 2021 This Version: 15th February 2021 Pramod Kumar Sur Asian Growth Research Institute (AGI) and Osaka University [email protected] Abstract India has had an established universal immunization program since 1985 and immunization services are available for free in healthcare facilities. Despite this, India has one of the lowest vaccination rates globally and contributes to the largest pool of under-vaccinated children in the world. Why is the vaccination rate low in India? This paper explores the importance of historical events in shaping India’s current vaccination practices. We examine India’s aggressive family planning program implemented during the period of emergency rule in the 1970s, under which millions of individuals were forcibly sterilized. We find that greater exposure to the forced sterilization policy has had negative effects on the current vaccination rate. We also find that institutional delivery and antenatal care are currently low in states where policy exposure is high. Together, the evidence suggests that the forced sterilization policy has had a persistent effect on current health-seeking behavior in India. Keywords: Vaccination, family planning, sterilization, institutional delivery, antenatal care, persistence JEL Classification: N35, I15, I18, O53, Z1 NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice. -
A Single Global Tender for Vaccine Procurement
A single global tender for vaccine procurement The scramble by the States is destined to be inequitable and inefficient and portrays lack of coordination ment. This is unlikely to yield much as most vaccine manufacturers hard- ly have any spare capacity for the next few months, but a single power- ful purchaser is more likely to tip the balance in India’s favour, apart from Chandrakant Lahariya & accomplishing obvious efficiency Soham D. Bhaduri and equity gains. The benefits of be- ing the single purchaser are not alien to the current government — the With only 20 million vaccine shots Centre’s own flagship healthcare available for the entire month of May programme, the Ayushman Bharat- for the 600 million people aged 18-44 Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana, is years in India, many State govern- an exemplar of such benefits. ments have resorted to floating glo- More specifically, on vaccination, bal tenders for COVID-19 vaccines. the Centre-State division of labour This situation is another example of has traditionally been one where the political promises being made with- Centre procures vaccines and the out sufficient planning. It also points States administer them. It was effec- to a lack of political will to find sus- tive vaccine delivery that helped the tainable solutions; inadequate coor- state deal with the public health pro- dination between States and the Un- blem of polio. The Central govern- ion government; and a focus on ment procured the vaccines and optics during a public health emer- States dealt with delivery. An emer- gency of unprecedented magnitude. -
WHO ADVANCED COURSE on HEALTH FINANCING for UNIVERSAL COVERAGE for LOW and MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES Barcelona, Spain, 13-17 June 2016
WHO ADVANCED COURSE ON HEALTH FINANCING FOR UNIVERSAL COVERAGE FOR LOW AND MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES Barcelona, Spain, 13-17 June 2016 FINAL LIST OF PARTICIPANTS COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE Bangladesh Ms Ito TOMOMI Representative for Health and Education JICA Bangladesh Office Japan International Cooperation Agency Bangladesh Burundi Dr Seleus SIBOMANA National Health Program Officer Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) Burundi Ethiopia Mr Mebratu Massebo CHERINET Senior Health Care Reform Specialist Health Sector Financing reform Federal Ministry of Health Ethiopia Mr Atkure Defar DEGHEBO Associate Researcher II Public Health Institute Health System and Reproductive Research Directorate Ethiopia Mr Tiliku Yeshanew LEMENIH Health Care Financing Advisor Health Sector Financing Reform/Health Finance and Governance Abt Assoc Ethiopia Dr Mizan Kiros MIRUTSE Resource mobilization Director Resource Mobilization Directorate Federal Ministry of Health Ethiopia Miss Genet Negusie REDAE Associate Health Financing, Health financing Advisor Resource Mobilization Directorate and Clinton Health Access Initiatives Federal Ministry of Health Ethiopia Dr Desalegn Tegabu ZEGEYE Clinical Services Directorate Director Federal Ministry of Health Ethiopia Gambia Mr Yaya BARJO Health Economist Ministry of Health and Social Welfare Gambia Germany Mr David Albert SCHEERER Policy Adviser P4H (Providing for Health) Department Health, Education and Social Development (G110) GIZ Germany Ghana Dr Francis Mensah ASENSO-BOADI Deputy Director Policy & Research Research, Policy, Monitoring and Evaluation Directorate National Health Insurance Authority Ghana Mr Selassi Amah D'ALMEIDA Health Economics Advisor Country Office Ghana, Accra World Health Organization Ghana Dr Lydia DSANE-SELBY Director Claims National Health Insurance Authority Ghana Mr Abass SULEYMANA Senior Manager Provider Payment Directorate National Health Insurance Authority Ghana India Dr Sachin BHOKARE Consultant Health Financing ACCESS Health International Inc. -
Docket Number 1980N – 0208
Comments and Questions regarding FDA’s proposed rule and order to license Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed Re: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration, 21 CFR Parts 201 and 610 [Docket No. 1980N–0208] Biological Products; Bacterial Vaccines and Toxoids; Implementation of Efficacy Review ACTION: Proposed rule and proposed order, 29 Fed. Reg. 78281-78293 (Dec 29, 2004).1 1. The lack of human efficacy trials precludes licensure. In its proposed rule, the FDA claims that AVA is efficacious in humans for inhalation and other forms of anthrax, basing this determination on indirect pieces of evidence, because there exist no clinical trials documenting efficacy of AVA for any route of exposure in humans. By so doing, FDA is flouting the existing statutory requirements2 for licensure of a vaccine, which require valid human data from an adequate and well-controlled clinical trials that support both efficacy and safety. In 1969 NIH asked that an IND study be undertaken “to determine human efficacy of the product.”3 The manufacturer never complied with this recommendation. 2. The Animal Rule cannot be used to license anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA) without correlates of protection. A second pathway for licensure of vaccines and drugs for bioterrorism, the so-called Animal Rule promulgated by FDA in 20024, requires data obtained from at least two animal species, in conjunction with correlates of immunity that assure the animal data can be extrapolated to humans with absolute reliability. No such correlates of immunity (i.e., surrogate markers for survival following exposure to anthrax) have yet been established 1 http://www.fda.gov/cber/rules/bvactox.pdf 2 21 CFR 601.25 3 Pittman M., Memorandum to S. -
Lack of Immune Homology with Vaccine Preventable Pathogens Suggests Childhood
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.13.20230862; this version posted November 16, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Lack of immune homology with vaccine preventable pathogens suggests childhood immunizations do not protect against SARS-CoV-2 through adaptive cross-immunity Running title: SARS-CoV-2 immune homology with vaccine pathogens Weihua Guo, Kyle O. Lee, Peter P. Lee* Department of Immuno-Oncology, Beckman Research Institute at the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA 91010 *Corresponding author: [email protected] Submitted to Cell Host & Microbes (Theory article) NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.13.20230862; this version posted November 16, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract (Summary) Recent epidemiological studies have investigated the potential effects of childhood immunization history on COVID-19 severity. Specifically, prior exposure to Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccine, oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV), or measles vaccine have been postulated to reduce COVID-19 severity – putative mechanism is via stimulation of the innate immune system to provide broader protection against non-specific pathogens.