Environmental Weeds and Invasive Plants
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Fungi of Slapton Ley National Nature Reserve and Environs
THE FUNGI OF SLAPTON LEY NATIONAL NATURE RESERVE AND ENVIRONS APRIL 2019 Image © Visit South Devon ASCOMYCOTA Order Family Name Abrothallales Abrothallaceae Abrothallus microspermus CY (IMI 164972 p.p., 296950), DM (IMI 279667, 279668, 362458), N4 (IMI 251260), Wood (IMI 400386), on thalli of Parmelia caperata and P. perlata. Mainly as the anamorph <it Abrothallus parmeliarum C, CY (IMI 164972), DM (IMI 159809, 159865), F1 (IMI 159892), 2, G2, H, I1 (IMI 188770), J2, N4 (IMI 166730), SV, on thalli of Parmelia carporrhizans, P Abrothallus parmotrematis DM, on Parmelia perlata, 1990, D.L. Hawksworth (IMI 400397, as Vouauxiomyces sp.) Abrothallus suecicus DM (IMI 194098); on apothecia of Ramalina fustigiata with st. conid. Phoma ranalinae Nordin; rare. (L2) Abrothallus usneae (as A. parmeliarum p.p.; L2) Acarosporales Acarosporaceae Acarospora fuscata H, on siliceous slabs (L1); CH, 1996, T. Chester. Polysporina simplex CH, 1996, T. Chester. Sarcogyne regularis CH, 1996, T. Chester; N4, on concrete posts; very rare (L1). Trimmatothelopsis B (IMI 152818), on granite memorial (L1) [EXTINCT] smaragdula Acrospermales Acrospermaceae Acrospermum compressum DM (IMI 194111), I1, S (IMI 18286a), on dead Urtica stems (L2); CY, on Urtica dioica stem, 1995, JLT. Acrospermum graminum I1, on Phragmites debris, 1990, M. Marsden (K). Amphisphaeriales Amphisphaeriaceae Beltraniella pirozynskii D1 (IMI 362071a), on Quercus ilex. Ceratosporium fuscescens I1 (IMI 188771c); J1 (IMI 362085), on dead Ulex stems. (L2) Ceriophora palustris F2 (IMI 186857); on dead Carex puniculata leaves. (L2) Lepteutypa cupressi SV (IMI 184280); on dying Thuja leaves. (L2) Monographella cucumerina (IMI 362759), on Myriophyllum spicatum; DM (IMI 192452); isol. ex vole dung. (L2); (IMI 360147, 360148, 361543, 361544, 361546). -
Glifosat Ve Diğer Herbisitlere Alternatif Yöntemler
Glifosat ve Diğer Herbisitlere Alternatif Yöntemler Entegre Ot Yönetimi Birçok küçük darbe 2 Teşekkürler: Bu rapor, The Greens/EFA’nın maddi desteğiyle geliştirilmiş ve PAN Avrupa personeli tarafından, Quercus’ta görevli ve Tras-o-Montes e Alto Douro Üniversitesi’nde (UTAD) toprak bilimi eğitmeni Prof. Isabel Branco ile, BHU Gelecek Çiftçilik Merkezi Başkanı Charles Merfield’ın değerli yardım ve katkılarıyla hazırlanmıştır. PAN Avrupa, bu raporun geliştirilmesi için gösterdikleri değerli çabalar için müteşekkirdir. Pestisit Eylem Ağı Avrupa, 2018 (ikinci baskı). Rue de la Pacification, 1000 Brüksel, Belçika Tel: +32 2 318 62 55; [email protected]; www.pan-europe.info Çeviren: Emre Rona 3 İstenmeyen ot yönetiminde herbisit kullanımına alternatifler: Glifosat örneği 01 – Giriş Tarımda sentetik pestisitlerin kullanımı sayesinde gıda üretimi artmış olsa da, bu, çevre, doğal varlıklar ve insan sağlığı pahasına gerçekleşmiştir. BM Gıda Hakkı Özel Sözcüsü’nün 2017 tarihli raporu, pestisit kullanımının insan hakları, insan sağlığı (işçiler, işçi aileleri, dışarıdan insanlar, mukimler, ve tüketiciler) ve çevre üzerindeki zararlı etkilerini vurgulamaktadır. Rapor, ayrıca, pestisit kullanımına bağlı yoğun tarımın, dünyadaki açlığı azaltmadığını da ortaya 1 çıkarmıştır . Herbisitler, tarım ve bahçecilikte daha fazla su, besin ve güneş ışığı için ürünler ve mera bitkileriyle rekabet ederek, tarım ve hayvancılıkta kayba yol açan, dolayısıyla kârı düşüren yabancı otlarla mücadelede kullanılmaktadır. Glifosat başta olmak üzere, herbisitlerin en yaygın kullanıldığı ikinci amaç ise, toprağın işlenmediği veya az işlendiği sistemlerde, hasat öncesinde ve sonrasında arazideki tüm bitki örtüsünü yok etmektir. Ayrıca, hasat öncesi tahıl ve tohum bitkilerini olgunlaştırmak ve kurutmak için de uygulanır. Tarım dışında ise, istilacı bitki türlerinden kurtulmak, kamusal alanların yönetiminde estetik amaçlar veya tehlikeli durumları ortadan kaldırmak niyetiyle (ör. -
Ohio Plant Disease Index
Special Circular 128 December 1989 Ohio Plant Disease Index The Ohio State University Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio This page intentionally blank. Special Circular 128 December 1989 Ohio Plant Disease Index C. Wayne Ellett Department of Plant Pathology The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio T · H · E OHIO ISJATE ! UNIVERSITY OARilL Kirklyn M. Kerr Director The Ohio State University Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio All publications of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center are available to all potential dientele on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, sex, age, handicap, or Vietnam-era veteran status. 12-89-750 This page intentionally blank. Foreword The Ohio Plant Disease Index is the first step in develop Prof. Ellett has had considerable experience in the ing an authoritative and comprehensive compilation of plant diagnosis of Ohio plant diseases, and his scholarly approach diseases known to occur in the state of Ohia Prof. C. Wayne in preparing the index received the acclaim and support .of Ellett had worked diligently on the preparation of the first the plant pathology faculty at The Ohio State University. edition of the Ohio Plant Disease Index since his retirement This first edition stands as a remarkable ad substantial con as Professor Emeritus in 1981. The magnitude of the task tribution by Prof. Ellett. The index will serve us well as the is illustrated by the cataloguing of more than 3,600 entries complete reference for Ohio for many years to come. of recorded diseases on approximately 1,230 host or plant species in 124 families. -
Tarset and Greystead Biological Records
Tarset and Greystead Biological Records published by the Tarset Archive Group 2015 Foreword Tarset Archive Group is delighted to be able to present this consolidation of biological records held, for easy reference by anyone interested in our part of Northumberland. It is a parallel publication to the Archaeological and Historical Sites Atlas we first published in 2006, and the more recent Gazeteer which both augments the Atlas and catalogues each site in greater detail. Both sets of data are also being mapped onto GIS. We would like to thank everyone who has helped with and supported this project - in particular Neville Geddes, Planning and Environment manager, North England Forestry Commission, for his invaluable advice and generous guidance with the GIS mapping, as well as for giving us information about the archaeological sites in the forested areas for our Atlas revisions; Northumberland National Park and Tarset 2050 CIC for their all-important funding support, and of course Bill Burlton, who after years of sharing his expertise on our wildflower and tree projects and validating our work, agreed to take this commission and pull everything together, obtaining the use of ERIC’s data from which to select the records relevant to Tarset and Greystead. Even as we write we are aware that new records are being collected and sites confirmed, and that it is in the nature of these publications that they are out of date by the time you read them. But there is also value in taking snapshots of what is known at a particular point in time, without which we have no way of measuring change or recognising the hugely rich biodiversity of where we are fortunate enough to live. -
An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Monika KOZŁOWSKA, Wiesław MUŁENKO Marcin ANUSIEWICZ, Magda MAMCZARZ
An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Fungal Biota of the An Annotated Catalogue of the Monika KOZŁOWSKA, Wiesław MUŁENKO Marcin ANUSIEWICZ, Magda MAMCZARZ An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Richness, Diversity and Distribution MARIA CURIE-SkłODOWSKA UNIVERSITY PRESS POLISH BOTANICAL SOCIETY Grzyby_okladka.indd 6 11.02.2019 14:52:24 An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Richness, Diversity and Distribution Monika KOZŁOWSKA, Wiesław MUŁENKO Marcin ANUSIEWICZ, Magda MAMCZARZ An Annotated Catalogue of the Fungal Biota of the Roztocze Upland Richness, Diversity and Distribution MARIA CURIE-SkłODOWSKA UNIVERSITY PRESS POLISH BOTANICAL SOCIETY LUBLIN 2019 REVIEWER Dr hab. Małgorzata Ruszkiewicz-Michalska COVER DESIN, TYPESETTING Studio Format © Te Authors, 2019 © Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press, Lublin 2019 ISBN 978-83-227-9164-6 ISBN 978-83-950171-8-6 ISBN 978-83-950171-9-3 (online) PUBLISHER Polish Botanical Society Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland pbsociety.org.pl Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press 20-031 Lublin, ul. Idziego Radziszewskiego 11 tel. (81) 537 53 04 wydawnictwo.umcs.eu [email protected] Sales Department tel. / fax (81) 537 53 02 Internet bookshop: wydawnictwo.umcs.eu [email protected] PRINTED IN POLAND, by „Elpil”, ul. Artyleryjska 11, 08-110 Siedlce AUTHOR’S AFFILIATION Department of Botany and Mycology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin Monika Kozłowska, [email protected]; Wiesław -
Lep., Sesiidae)
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte Jahr/Year: 1997/1998 Band/Volume: 41 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kallies Axel Artikel/Article: Synopsis der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland nachgewiesenen Glasflügler-Arten (Lep., Sesiidae). 107-111 © Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte; downloadEntomologische unter www.biologiezentrum.at Nachrichten und Berichte, 41,1997/2 107 A. K a l l ie s , Schwerin Synopsis der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland nachgewiesenen Glasflügler-Arten (Lep., Sesiidae)* Zusammenfassung Es wird eine Synopsis der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland nachgewiesenen Glasflüg lerarten vorgelegt, in der die Nachweise in Tabellenform für die einzelnen Bundesländer aufgeschlüsselt werden. Da sich die Kenntnisse der Biologie und Verbreitung der Glasflügler in den letzten 10 Jahren enorm erweitert ha ben, sind viele der Einzeldaten, auf deren Grundlage die vorliegende Übersicht erarbeitet wurde, sehr aktuell und noch nicht publiziert worden. Insgesamt wurden in Deutschland 35 Glasflüglerarten nachgewiesen. Davon wurden 33 Arten aktuell in mindestens einem Bundesland gefunden. Zwei Arten Bembecia( megillaeformis (H übner ) und Chamaesphecia annellata (Z eller )) konnten seit etwa 40 Jahren nicht mehr beobachtet werden, sie gelten als ver schollen. Meldungen für weitere 4 Arten sind sehr zweifelhaft und vermutlich auf Fehldeterminationen zurückzu führen. Diese Arten sind nicht Teil der -
CABI Staff Publications in 2016 Acheampong, M.A., Cornelius, E.W
CABI staff publications in 2016 Acheampong, M.A., Cornelius, E.W., Eziah, V.Y., Fening, K.O., Luke, B., Moore, D., Clottey, V.A., Storm, C. and Potin, O. (2016) Beauveria bassiana affects immature stage development of Prostephanus truncatus (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in stored maize. Biocontrol Science and Technology 26(11), 1516–1525. Afari-Sefa, V., Rajendran, S., Kessy, R.F., Karanja, D.K., Musebe, R., Samali, S. and Makaranga, M. (2016) Impact of nutritional perceptions of traditional African vegetables on farm household production decisions: a case study of smallholders in Tanzania. Experimental Agriculture 52(2), 300–313. Andrianova, T.V. and Minter, D.W. (2016) Hyaline hyphomycetes on herbaceous plants. IMI Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria 207(2061-2070), [52] pp. [Cercosporella lindaviana; Neoovularia nomuriana; Phacellium episphaerium; Ramularia ajugae, R. didymarioides, R. lamii, R. marrubii, R. oreophila, R. ovata; Tretovularia villiana]. Baker, T., Caracciolo, C., Doroszenko, A. and Suominen, O. (2016) GACS Core: Creation of a Global Agricultural Concept Scheme. Communications in Computer and Information Science 672, 311–316. Banerjee, S. and Batra, P. (2016) CABI Direct2Farm: An innovative model of rural development harnessing mobile ICT. Journal of Global Communications Special Volume, 9(2), 100–107. Bateman, M., Chernoh, E., Holmes, K., Grunder, J., Grossrieder, M, Colmenarez, Y., Babendreier, D., Faheem, M. and Mulaa, M. (2016) Training Guide on Integrated Pest Management in Tobacco. CABI, Wallingford, UK, 196 pp. Boa, E., Franco, J., Chaudhury, M., Simbalaya, P. and Van Der Linde, E. (2016) Plant Health Clinics. Note 23. GFRAS Good Practice Notes for Extension and Advisory Services. GFRAS, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4 pp. -
Dock Control. Combining the Best Methods for Successful Control
Technical guide 2018 | FiBL No. 1718 Dock Control Combining the best methods for successful control Combining preventive and direct control measures The two main dock species broad-leaved dock The strategy presented in this technical guide builds (Rumex obtusifolius) and curly dock (Rumex cris- on measures to prevent the (further) establishment pus L.) are a problem for many organic farms in of dock plants. Depending on the level of dock in- most areas. Although docks are not speci fically an festation, different techniques are recommended ‘organic’ problem, management on organic farms for removing and suppressing established docks. without recourse to herbicides can be particular- Only by dealing with the causes of dock prolifer- ly challenging. To date, there is no ‘magic bullet’ ation can the reproductive cycle be broken and for the solution of the dock problem on organic long-term control be achieved. farms. The most promising approach therefore is a combination of several measures. Dock control strategy 1. Avoid the causes of dock proliferation • Gaps in crops? • Weakened crops? • Spreading of dock seeds? > Pages 4–6 2. Assess the dock density 3. Select appropriate control measures • Control by removal of single Up to 0.25 plants is possible at this level. Dig out, till or kill Reseed gaps dock plants • Check dock proliferation regularly. single dock plants + in the pasture per m2 > Page 7 > Page 8 0.25 to 2 • Measures for single plants only Remove inflorescences Reseed gaps dock plants make sense in combination with + dig out, till or kill the or the entire 2 reseeding and a change of + per m cultivation practices. -
Experimental Trials in Europe 2019 Edition
Integrated Weed Management: PRActical Implementation and Solutions for Europe EXPERIMENTAL TRIALS IN EUROPE 2019 EDITION This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under agreement no. 727321 IWMPRAISE - H2020-SFS-2016-2017/H2020-SFS-2016-2 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 727321 Authors: Irache Garnica (INTIA - Instituto Navarro de Tecnologias e Infrastructuras Agroalimentarias) Juan Antonio Lezaun (INTIA - Instituto Navarro de Tecnologias e Infrastructuras Agroalimentarias) José Luis González-Andújar (CSIC - Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible) Verónica Pedraza Jimenez (CSIC - Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible) Daniele Antichi (Centre for Agri-environmental Research “Enrico Avanzi”, University of Pisa) Christian Frasconi (Centre for Agri-environmental Research “Enrico Avanzi”, University of Pisa) Stefano Carlesi (Institute of Life Sciences - Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa) Mariateresa Lazzaro (Institute of Life Sciences - Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa) Federico Leoni (Institute of Life Sciences - Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa) Anna Camilla Moonen (Institute of Life Sciences - Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa) Dylan Warren Raffa (Institute of Life Sciences - Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa) Valentina Mastretta (Horta srl) Matteo Ruggeri (Horta srl) Donato Loddo (Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection - National Research Council of Italy) Giovanni Laidò (ISEA -
Host Range, Geographical Distribution and Current Accepted Names of Cercosporoid and Ramularioid Species in Iran
Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology (Journal of Fungal Biology) 9(1): 122–163 (2019) ISSN 2229-2225 www.creamjournal.org Article Doi 10.5943/cream/9/1/13 Host range, geographical distribution and current accepted names of cercosporoid and ramularioid species in Iran Pirnia M Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran Pirnia M 2019 – Host range, geographical distribution and current accepted names of cercosporoid and ramularioid species in Iran. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology (Journal of Fungal Biology) 9(1), 122–163, Doi 10.5943/cream/9/1/13 Abstract Comprehensive up to date information of cercosporoid and ramularioid species of Iran is given with their hosts, geographical distribution and references. A total of 186 taxa belonging to 24 genara are listed. Among them, 134 taxa were belonged to 16 Cercospora and Cercospora-like genera viz. Cercospora (62 species), Cercosporidium (1 species), Clypeosphaerella (1 species), Fulvia (1 species), Graminopassalora (1 species), Neocercospora (1 species), Neocercosporidium (1 species), Nothopassalora (1 species), Paracercosporidium (1 species), Passalora (21 species), Pseudocercospora (36 species), Rosisphaerella (1 species), Scolecostigmina (2 species), Sirosporium (2 species), Sultanimyces (1 species) and Zasmidium (1 species); and 52 taxa were belonged to 8 Ramularia and Ramularia-like genera viz. Cercosporella (2 species), Microcyclosporella (1 species), Neoovularia (2 species), Neopseudocercosporella (1 species), Neoramularia (2 species), Ramularia (42 species), Ramulariopsis (1 species) and Ramulispora (1 species). Key words – anamorphic fungi – biodiversity – Cercospora-like genera – Ramularia-like genera – west of Asia Introduction Cercosporoid and ramularioid fungi are traditionally related to the genus Mycospharella Johanson. Sivanesan (1984) investigated teleomorph-anamorph connexions in bitunicate ascomycetes and cited that Mycosphaerella is related to some anamorphic genera viz. -
Economic, Biodiversity, Resource Protection and Social Values of Orchards: a Study of Six Orchards by the Herefordshire Orchards Community Evaluation Project
Natural England Commissioned Report NECR090 Economic, biodiversity, resource protection and social values of orchards: A study of six orchards by the Herefordshire Orchards Community Evaluation Project First published 04 May 2012 www.naturalengland.org.uk Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background This report describes the results of a partnership the different types and characteristics of orchards project, which ran from 2006-2010, to investigate the found in Herefordshire. All the orchards had multiple values of orchards beyond value generated by the values, although not all orchards had all the values economic enterprise of orchard management. assessed and values differed in importance across Uncertainty in markets for orchard produce, orchards. The project found that local communities development pressure, neglect and land use change cared about the orchards in their locality, and all pose threats to the continued existence of welcomed engagement about their worth. orchards, making a full understanding of the values Each of the chapters about orchard values in the of orchards an urgent need. report has been peer-reviewed but the findings are The project was set up by the Herefordshire Orchard the responsibility of the authors alone and do not Topic Group, an independent association of necessarily represent the views of any of the individuals and organizations working to support all partnership organisations. Monetary evaluation is a aspects of orchards and orcharding in Herefordshire. -
BOLD Taxonid Tree
BOLD TaxonID Tree Project : Merged Project[NO CODE] Date : 26-September-2009 Data Type : Nucleotide Distance Model : Kimura 2 Parameter Codon Positions : 1st, 2nd, 3rd Labels : Country & Province, SampleID, Colorization : Sequence Count : 248 Species count : 102 Genus count : 12 Family count : 1 Unidentified : 2 Cover Page 1/1 Merged_Project[NO_CODE] Sat Sep 26 11:06:27 2009 Page 1 of 3 5 % Microsphecia tineiformis|AJ864350 Microsphecia tineiformis|AJ864349 Microsphecia tineiformis|BOX-2221 B06|Greece Microsphecia tineiformis|BOX-2218 A10|Morocco Pennisetia bohemica|BOX-2221 A06|Austria.Niederoesterreich Pennisetia hylaeiformis|AJ862889 Pennisetia hylaeiformis|AJ862888 Pennisetia hylaeiformis|BOX-2218 B05|Austria.Oberoesterreich Pennisetia hylaeiformis|BOX-2220 B05|Sweden Sesiinae|BOX-2218 A04|Ghana.Central Negotinthia myrmosaeformis|AJ864351 Negotinthia myrmosaeformis|BOX-2221 G08|Greece Negotinthia hoplisiformis|BOX-2218 B04|Turkey.Van Ili Paranthrene tabaniformis|BOX-2221 E01|Italy.Sardinia Paranthrene tabaniformis|BOX-2221 A11|Austria.Niederoesterreich Paranthrene tabaniformis|AJ864352 Paranthrene tabaniformis|BOX-2218 D03|Greece Paranthrene tabaniformis|BOX-2218 D08|Italy.Sicily Paranthrene tabaniformis|BOX-2220 D09|Slovenia Paranthrene insolita|BOX-2218 C11|Italy.Sicily Paranthrene insolita polonica|BOX-2218 A09|Hungary Paranthrene insolita polonica|BOX-2221 F01|Austria.Oberoesterreich Paranthrene insolita polonica|BOX-2218 C12|Austria.Oberoesterreich Paranthrene insolita polonica|BOX-2220 A11|Slovenia Paranthrene insolita|BOX-2220