BOLD Taxonid Tree

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BOLD Taxonid Tree BOLD TaxonID Tree Project : Merged Project[NO CODE] Date : 26-September-2009 Data Type : Nucleotide Distance Model : Kimura 2 Parameter Codon Positions : 1st, 2nd, 3rd Labels : Country & Province, SampleID, Colorization : Sequence Count : 248 Species count : 102 Genus count : 12 Family count : 1 Unidentified : 2 Cover Page 1/1 Merged_Project[NO_CODE] Sat Sep 26 11:06:27 2009 Page 1 of 3 5 % Microsphecia tineiformis|AJ864350 Microsphecia tineiformis|AJ864349 Microsphecia tineiformis|BOX-2221 B06|Greece Microsphecia tineiformis|BOX-2218 A10|Morocco Pennisetia bohemica|BOX-2221 A06|Austria.Niederoesterreich Pennisetia hylaeiformis|AJ862889 Pennisetia hylaeiformis|AJ862888 Pennisetia hylaeiformis|BOX-2218 B05|Austria.Oberoesterreich Pennisetia hylaeiformis|BOX-2220 B05|Sweden Sesiinae|BOX-2218 A04|Ghana.Central Negotinthia myrmosaeformis|AJ864351 Negotinthia myrmosaeformis|BOX-2221 G08|Greece Negotinthia hoplisiformis|BOX-2218 B04|Turkey.Van Ili Paranthrene tabaniformis|BOX-2221 E01|Italy.Sardinia Paranthrene tabaniformis|BOX-2221 A11|Austria.Niederoesterreich Paranthrene tabaniformis|AJ864352 Paranthrene tabaniformis|BOX-2218 D03|Greece Paranthrene tabaniformis|BOX-2218 D08|Italy.Sicily Paranthrene tabaniformis|BOX-2220 D09|Slovenia Paranthrene insolita|BOX-2218 C11|Italy.Sicily Paranthrene insolita polonica|BOX-2218 A09|Hungary Paranthrene insolita polonica|BOX-2221 F01|Austria.Oberoesterreich Paranthrene insolita polonica|BOX-2218 C12|Austria.Oberoesterreich Paranthrene insolita polonica|BOX-2220 A11|Slovenia Paranthrene insolita|BOX-2220 F11|Spain Chamaesphecia crassicornis|CCDB-02110 A08|Serbia and Montenegro Chamaesphecia crassicornis|CCDB-02110 A09|Czech Republic.Moravia Chamaesphecia zimmermannii|CCDB-02111 E07|Iran.Khorasan Chamaesphecia zimmermannii|CCDB-02111 E08|Iran.Khorasan Chamaesphecia osmiaeformis|BOX-2221 E07|Italy.Sardinia Chamaesphecia osmiaeformis|CCDB-02111 B05|Italy Chamaesphecia osmiaeformis|CCDB-02111 B06|Italy Chamaesphecia doleriformis|AJ864371 Chamaesphecia doleriformis colpiformis|CCDB-02111 B08|Slovenia Chamaesphecia proximata|AJ864373 Chamaesphecia proximata|CCDB-02111 C09|Greece Chamaesphecia proximata|AJ864374 Chamaesphecia proximata|CCDB-02111 C10|Greece Chamaesphecia proximata|CCDB-02111 E09|Iran.Golestan Chamaesphecia chalciformis|CCDB-02111 A07|Greece Chamaesphecia chalciformis|AJ864366 Chamaesphecia chalciformis|CCDB-02111 A06|Greece Chamaesphecia chalciformis|CCDB-02111 A08|Greece Chamaesphecia chalciformis|CCDB-02111 G07|Syria Chamaesphecia mysiniformis|CCDB-02110 H08|Spain.Granada Chamaesphecia mysiniformis|CCDB-02110 H09|Spain.Granada Chamaesphecia mysiniformis|CCDB-02110 H11|France.Vaucluse Chamaesphecia guenter|CCDB-02111 A05|Morocco Chamaesphecia annellata|AJ864372 Chamaesphecia annellata|BOX-2221 D04|Austria.Niederoesterreich Chamaesphecia annellata|BOX-2221 D07|Austria.Niederoesterreich Chamaesphecia dumonti|CCDB-02111 C05|Slovenia Chamaesphecia minoica|BOX-2221 E10|Greece.Crete Chamaesphecia minoica|AJ852028 Chamaesphecia minoica|BOX-2221 E05|Greece.Crete Chamaesphecia minoica|CCDB-02110 G01|Greece.Crete Chamaesphecia empiformis|BOX-2221 G06|Greece Chamaesphecia hungarica|BOX-2221 H04|Austria.Niederoesterreich Chamaesphecia hungarica|CCDB-02110 A12|Austria.Niederoesterreich Chamaesphecia hungarica|CCDB-02110 B01|Slovenia Chamaesphecia empiformis|CCDB-02110 C01|Switzerland Chamaesphecia empiformis|CCDB-02110 C04|Austria.Tyrol Chamaesphecia empiformis|CCDB-02110 C08|Italy.South Tyrol Chamaesphecia empiformis|CCDB-02110 C07|Romania Chamaesphecia empiformis|AJ864348 Chamaesphecia empiformis|CCDB-02110 C03|Austria.Upper Austria Chamaesphecia empiformis|CCDB-02110 C05|Ukraine Chamaesphecia empiformis|CCDB-02110 C06|Czech Republic Chamaesphecia empiformis|AJ864370 Chamaesphecia empiformis|CCDB-02110 C09|Hungary Chamaesphecia tenthrediniformis|CCDB-02110 A06|Germany.Saxony-Anhalt Chamaesphecia tenthrediniformis|AJ862904 Chamaesphecia tenthrediniformis|CCDB-02110 A05|Slovenia Chamaesphecia tenthrediniformis|CCDB-02110 A02|Austria.Upper Austria Chamaesphecia tenthrediniformis|CCDB-02110 A07|Czech Republic.Bohemia Chamaesphecia tenthrediniformis|CCDB-02111 E04|Austria.Niederoesterreich Chamaesphecia sp. 11FP|CCDB-02111 F07|Iran.Golestan Chamaesphecia astatiformis|CCDB-02110 C10|Romania Chamaesphecia nigrifrons|CCDB-02110 E11|Serbia and Montenegro Chamaesphecia nigrifrons|CCDB-02110 E09|Poland Chamaesphecia nigrifrons|AJ864376 Chamaesphecia nigrifrons|CCDB-02110 E07|Germany.Baden-Wuerttemberg Chamaesphecia nigrifrons|CCDB-02110 E08|Austria.Niederoesterreich Chamaesphecia nigrifrons|CCDB-02110 E10|Slovenia Chamaesphecia nigrifrons|CCDB-02110 E12|Germany Chamaesphecia alysoniformis|AJ852029 Chamaesphecia schwingenschussi|CCDB-02110 F12|Turkey.Nevsehir Chamaesphecia schwingenschussi|CCDB-02111 F03|Iran.Golestan Chamaesphecia anthraciformis|BOX-2221 D09|Italy.Sardinia Chamaesphecia anthraciformis|CCDB-02110 E01|Morocco Chamaesphecia anthraciformis|CCDB-02110 E02|Morocco Chamaesphecia anthraciformis|CCDB-02110 E05|Morocco Chamaesphecia iranica|CCDB-02110 D01|Iran.Khorasan Chamaesphecia bibioniformis|CCDB-02110 D04|Spain.Granada Chamaesphecia bibioniformis|CCDB-02110 D07|Greece.Crete Chamaesphecia bibioniformis|AJ864377 Chamaesphecia bibioniformis|AJ864378 Chamaesphecia bibioniformis|CCDB-02110 D05|Greece Chamaesphecia bibioniformis|CCDB-02110 D08|Greece Chamaesphecia leucocnemis|CCDB-02110 D02|Iran Chamaesphecia bibioniformis|CCDB-02110 D03|Kazakhstan Chamaesphecia bibioniformis|CCDB-02110 D09|Hungary Chamaesphecia bibioniformis|CCDB-02110 D12|Hungary Chamaesphecia palustris|CCDB-02110 G03|Austria.Burgenland Chamaesphecia palustris|CCDB-02110 G02|Austria.Burgenland Chamaesphecia palustris|CCDB-02110 G04|Slovakia Chamaesphecia palustris|CCDB-02110 G05|Czech Republic.Moravia Chamaesphecia euceraeformis|CCDB-02110 G06|Austria.Niederoesterreich Chamaesphecia euceraeformis|CCDB-02110 G07|Slovenia Chamaesphecia euceraeformis|AJ864367 Chamaesphecia euceraeformis|CCDB-02110 B02|Slovakia Chamaesphecia euceraeformis|CCDB-02110 G09|Hungary Chamaesphecia amygdaloidis|CCDB-02110 G12|Austria.Steiermark Chamaesphecia amygdaloidis|AJ864369 Chamaesphecia amygdaloidis|CCDB-02110 H01|Austria.Upper Austria Chamaesphecia amygdaloidis|CCDB-02110 H03|Austria.Steiermark Chamaesphecia euceraeformis|CCDB-02110 G08|Serbia and Montenegro Chamaesphecia euceraeformis|CCDB-02110 G10|Slovakia Chamaesphecia amygdaloidis|CCDB-02110 H02|Austria.Upper Austria Chamaesphecia amygdaloidis|CCDB-02110 H04|Austria.Upper Austria Chamaesphecia euceraeformis|CCDB-02110 B04|Hungary Chamaesphecia euceraeformis|CCDB-02110 G11|Slovenia Chamaesphecia amygdaloidis|BOX-2221 E12|Austria.Oberoesterreich Chamaesphecia amygdaloidis|CCDB-02110 H05|Austria.Upper Austria Chamaesphecia amygdaloidis|AJ864368 Chamaesphecia amygdaloidis|CCDB-02110 H06|Austria.Upper Austria Chamaesphecia amygdaloidis|CCDB-02110 H07|Austria.Niederoesterreich Chamaesphecia murzini|CCDB-02111 G08|Kazakhstan Chamaesphecia masariformis|AJ864375 Chamaesphecia masariformis|CCDB-02111 C12|Italy.Sicily Chamaesphecia aerifrons sardoa|BOX-2221 E02|Italy.Sardinia Chamaesphecia aerifrons aerifrons|CCDB-02110 F03|Morocco Chamaesphecia aerifrons aerifrons|CCDB-02110 F06|Italy.Sicily Chamaesphecia aerifrons aerifrons|CCDB-02110 F07|Slovenia Chamaesphecia aerifrons aerifrons|CCDB-02110 F08|Croatia Chamaesphecia aerifrons|BOX-2220 G11|Portugal Chamaesphecia aerifrons aerifrons|CCDB-02110 F05|Spain.Madrid Chamaesphecia aerifrons|AJ852030 Chamaesphecia aerifrons aerifrons|CCDB-02110 F09|Italy.Veneto Chamaesphecia maurusia|CCDB-02111 D02|Italy.Sicily Chamaesphecia anthrax|AJ862891 Chamaesphecia maurusia|CCDB-02111 D04|Portugal Chamaesphecia maurusia|CCDB-02111 D03|Morocco Chamaesphecia maurusia|CCDB-02111 D05|Morocco Chamaesphecia anatolica|BOX-2221 F09|Greece Chamaesphecia schmidtiiformis|BOX-2221 H11|Slovenia Chamaesphecia schmidtiiformis|CCDB-02111 A11|Slovenia Synansphecia maroccanum|BOX-2221 C08|Morocco Synansphecia kautzi|AJ862903 Synansphecia kautzi|BOX-2219 G12|Spain.Granada Pyropteron aistleitneri|BOX-2220 G06|Spain.Granada Synansphecia leucomelaena|AJ864363 Pyropteron leucomelaena|CCDB-02110 B08|Greece.Epirus Pyropteron leucomelaena|CCDB-02110 B06|Morocco Pyropteron leucomelaena|CCDB-02110 B09|Morocco Pyropteron leucomelaena|CCDB-02110 B12|Morocco Pyropteron leucomelaena|CCDB-02110 B11|Spain Chamaesphecia astatiformis|CCDB-02110 C12|Greece Pyropteron affine|CCDB-02111 E03|Italy Synansphecia triannuliformis|AJ864361 Synansphecia triannuliforme|BOX-2221 G01|Greece Synansphecia triannuliformis|AJ864362 Synansphecia triannuliforme|BOX-2221 H06|Austria.Niederoesterreich Synansphecia umbrifera|AJ864364 Synansphecia umbrifera|AJ864365 Synansphecia cirgisum|BOX-2221 H07|Turkey Synansphecia cirgisum|BOX-2221 H09|Turkey Pyropteron koschwitzi|BOX-2220 G08|Spain Pyropteron doryliforme doryliforme|BOX-2219 F06|Morocco Pyropteron ceriaeforme|BOX-2219 F10|Morocco Pyropteron chrysidiforme|BOX-2220 G04|Portugal.Braganca Pyropteron chrysidiforme siculum|BOX-2219 E12|Italy.Sicily Pyropteron chrysidiforme|AJ862901 Pyropteron chrysidiforme|CCDB-02111 A12|Slovenia Pyropteron minianiforme|AJ862902 Pyropteron minianiforme|AJ864360 Pyropteron minianiforme|BOX-2221 H02|Greece Pyropteron minianiforme|CCDB-02111 F05|Iran.Khorasan Synanthedon theryi|BOX-2218 F12|Morocco Synanthedon myopaeformis cruentata|BOX-2218 G05|Italy.Sicily Synanthedon myopaeformis|BOX-2221 G10|Greece Synanthedon myopaeformis|BOX-2218 G08|Austria.Karnten Synanthedon sp.|BOX-2221 G05|Greece Synanthedon loranthi|BOX-2218 H02|Spain.Tarragona
Recommended publications
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Notalepid. 26 (1/2): 35^16 35 Synanthedon pamphyla sp. n. from southern Turkey with a comparative analysis of mitochondrial DNA of related species (Sesiidae) Axel Rallies The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, IG Royal Parade, Melbourne/Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia, e-mail: [email protected] au Abstract. Synanthedon culiciformis (Linnaeus, 1758) shows a circumpolar distribution and is recorded from most parts of the northern Palaearctic region and from North America. Its known sister species, Synanthedon talischensis (Battel, 1906), however, is endemic to the Hyrcanian fauna and is found only in Talish south of the Caspian Sea. Here, another species, Synanthedon pamphyla sp. n., closely allied to S. culiciformis is described from southern Turkey. It is clearly separated from the known species by exter- nal characters, morphology of genitalia and bionomics. Further, sequences of two mitochondrial DNA regions of S. culiciformis and S. pamphyla sp. n. are analysed and compared to homologous sequences of the 'outgroup' species Synanthedon spheciformis ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775). This analysis sug- gests an isolation of S. culiciformis and S. pamphyla sp. n. for at least 300 000 years and implies that the latter species can be regarded as a Pleistocene relict. Zusammenfassung. Synanthedon culiciformis (Linnaeus, 1758) ist eine circumpolar verbreitete Art, die in der gesamten nördlichen Palaearktis und in Nordamerika vorkommt. Ihre einzige bisher bekannte Schwesterart, Synanthedon talischensis (Barrel, 1906), ist dagegen ein Endemit der hyrcanischen Fauna und ist nur aus Talish südlich des Kaspischen Meeres bekannt. In dieser Arbeit wird eine weitere eben- falls eng mit S.
    [Show full text]
  • Synanthedon Mesiaeformis (Herrich-Schäffer) New to the Czech Republic and to Spain (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae)
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS AGRICULTURAE ET SILVICULTURAE MENDELIANAE BRUNENSIS SBORNÍK MENDELOVY ZEMĚDĚLSKÉ A LESNICKÉ UNIVERZITY V BRNĚ Volume LVI 19 Number 5, 2008 SYNANTHEDON MESIAEFORMIS (HERRICH- SCHÄFFER) NEW TO THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND TO SPAIN (LEPIDOPTERA: SESIIDAE) Z. Laštůvka, A. Laštůvka Received: June 4, 2008 Abstract LAŠTŮVKA, Z., LAŠTŮVKA, A.: Synanthedon mesiaeformis (Herrich-Schäff er) new to the Czech Republic and to Spain (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae). Acta univ. agric. et silvic. Mendel. Brun., 2008, LVI, No. 5, pp. 141–146 Synanthedon mesiaeformis (Herrich-Schäff er, 1846) has been found in the Czech Republic and in Spain for the fi rst time. The species was found in the south-easternmost part of the Czech Republic, near the town of Břeclav (faunistic quadrat 7267) in May 2008. The holes and pupae were found only in one, solitary growing group of trees about 20 years old. This fi nding place lies at a distance of more than 250 km from the localities in SW Hungary and about 550 km from the localities in eastern Poland. In June 2008, the species was found also in alders growing in the fl at river alluvium on gravel sands be- tween La Jonquera and Figueres in northern Catalonia. This locality is in a close contact with the fi n- ding places near Perpignan and Beziers in southern France. The diagnostic morphological characters and bionomics of this species are briefl y summarized and fi gured. The history of its distribution re- search is recapitulated and the causes of its disjunct range are discussed as follows. The present dis- junct range represents a residual of the former distribution over the warmer and moister postglacial period; landscape modifi cations and elimination of solitary alder trees as „weeds“ from the 18th up to the mid-20th century in large areas of Europe; narrow and partly unknown habitat requirements and specifi c population ethology; an insuffi cient level of faunistic investigations in several parts of sou- thern and eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Recerca I Territori V12 B (002)(1).Pdf
    Butterfly and moths in l’Empordà and their response to global change Recerca i territori Volume 12 NUMBER 12 / SEPTEMBER 2020 Edition Graphic design Càtedra d’Ecosistemes Litorals Mediterranis Mostra Comunicació Parc Natural del Montgrí, les Illes Medes i el Baix Ter Museu de la Mediterrània Printing Gràfiques Agustí Coordinadors of the volume Constantí Stefanescu, Tristan Lafranchis ISSN: 2013-5939 Dipòsit legal: GI 896-2020 “Recerca i Territori” Collection Coordinator Printed on recycled paper Cyclus print Xavier Quintana With the support of: Summary Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Xavier Quintana Butterflies of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ................................................................................................................. 11 Tristan Lafranchis Moths of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ............................................................................................................................31 Tristan Lafranchis The dispersion of Lepidoptera in the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ...........................................................51 Tristan Lafranchis Three decades of butterfly monitoring at El Cortalet ...................................................................................69 (Aiguamolls de l’Empordà Natural Park) Constantí Stefanescu Effects of abandonment and restoration in Mediterranean meadows .......................................87
    [Show full text]
  • Glifosat Ve Diğer Herbisitlere Alternatif Yöntemler
    Glifosat ve Diğer Herbisitlere Alternatif Yöntemler Entegre Ot Yönetimi Birçok küçük darbe 2 Teşekkürler: Bu rapor, The Greens/EFA’nın maddi desteğiyle geliştirilmiş ve PAN Avrupa ​ personeli tarafından, Quercus’ta görevli ve Tras-o-Montes e Alto Douro Üniversitesi’nde (UTAD) toprak bilimi eğitmeni Prof. Isabel Branco ile, BHU Gelecek Çiftçilik Merkezi Başkanı Charles Merfield’ın değerli yardım ve katkılarıyla hazırlanmıştır. PAN Avrupa, bu raporun geliştirilmesi için gösterdikleri değerli çabalar için müteşekkirdir. Pestisit Eylem Ağı Avrupa, 2018 (ikinci baskı). Rue de la Pacification, 1000 Brüksel, Belçika Tel: +32 2 318 62 55; [email protected]; www.pan-europe.info ​ ​ ​ Çeviren: Emre Rona 3 İstenmeyen ot yönetiminde herbisit kullanımına alternatifler: Glifosat örneği 01 – Giriş Tarımda sentetik pestisitlerin kullanımı sayesinde gıda üretimi artmış olsa da, bu, çevre, doğal varlıklar ve insan sağlığı pahasına gerçekleşmiştir. BM Gıda Hakkı Özel Sözcüsü’nün 2017 tarihli raporu, pestisit kullanımının insan hakları, insan sağlığı (işçiler, işçi aileleri, dışarıdan insanlar, mukimler, ve tüketiciler) ve çevre üzerindeki zararlı etkilerini vurgulamaktadır. Rapor, ayrıca, pestisit kullanımına bağlı yoğun tarımın, dünyadaki açlığı azaltmadığını da ortaya 1 çıkarmıştır . Herbisitler, tarım ve bahçecilikte daha fazla su, besin ve güneş ışığı için ürünler ve mera bitkileriyle rekabet ederek, tarım ve hayvancılıkta kayba yol açan, dolayısıyla kârı düşüren yabancı otlarla mücadelede kullanılmaktadır. Glifosat başta olmak üzere, herbisitlerin en yaygın kullanıldığı ikinci amaç ise, toprağın işlenmediği veya az işlendiği sistemlerde, hasat öncesinde ve sonrasında arazideki tüm bitki örtüsünü yok etmektir. Ayrıca, hasat öncesi tahıl ve tohum bitkilerini olgunlaştırmak ve kurutmak için de uygulanır. Tarım dışında ise, istilacı bitki türlerinden kurtulmak, kamusal alanların yönetiminde estetik amaçlar veya tehlikeli durumları ortadan kaldırmak niyetiyle (ör.
    [Show full text]
  • Host Range and Impact of Dichrorampha Aeratana, the First Potential Biological Control Agent for Leucanthemum Vulgare in North America and Australia
    insects Article Host Range and Impact of Dichrorampha aeratana, the First Potential Biological Control Agent for Leucanthemum vulgare in North America and Australia Sonja Stutz 1,* , Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate 2 , Hariet L. Hinz 1, Alec McClay 3 , Andrew J. McConnachie 4 and Urs Schaffner 1 1 CABI, Rue des Grillons 1, CH-2800 Delémont, Switzerland; [email protected] (H.L.H.); [email protected] (U.S.) 2 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, 5403—1 Ave. S., Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada; rosemarie.declerck-fl[email protected] 3 12 Roseglen Private, Ottawa, ON K1H 1B6, Canada; [email protected] 4 Weed Research Unit, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Biosecurity and Food Safety, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Oxeye daisy, a Eurasian member of the daisy family, has become invasive in several parts of the world, including North America and Australia. We investigated whether a root-feeding moth found closely associated with oxeye daisy in Europe could be used as a biological control agent for the plant when weedy. We found that the moth could develop on 11 out of 74 plant species that we tested in laboratory conditions when it was given no choice of plants. When the Citation: Stutz, S.; De Clerck-Floate, moths were given a choice of food plants outdoors, we found its larvae only on the ornamentals R.; Hinz, H.L.; McClay, A.; Shasta daisy and creeping daisy. Larval feeding had no impact on the weight and number of flowers McConnachie, A.J.; Schaffner, U.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of European Chamaesphecia Spp
    Bulletin of Entomological Research (1996) 86, 703-714 703 Description of European Chamaesphecia spp. (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) feeding on Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae), and their potential for biological control of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) in North America I. Tosevski, A. Gassmann and D. Schroeder International Institute of Biological Control, European Station, Delemont, Switzerland Abstract The description of the ten Chamaesphecia species associated with Euphorbia in eastern and south-eastern Europe is based on external adult morphology, male and female genitalia, and the structure of the egg chorion. These species can be divided into two groups according to the shape of the setae of the dorso-basal part of the valvae in the male genitalia. Most Chamaesphecia species are associated with one species of host-plant and all are closely tied to one habitat type. The host-plant and the structure of the egg chorion are fundamental characteristics for the determination of a few species, and very helpful for the others. All species bore into the main root of their host-plant and overwinter as larvae. With the exception of two species which have an annual or biennial life cycle, all species are univoltine. The larvae of three of the eight Chamaesphecia spp. investigated feed and develop in the roots of North American leafy spurge, Euphorbia esula sensu lato. Of these, the best candidate for the biological control of leafy spurge is C. crassicornis, because the larvae have a similar survival rate on the target weed and the European host-plant, E. virgata. Introduction group of species in Europe is attacked by a large complex of specialized insects and pathogens, and thus it is a suitable Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula Linnaeus sensu lato) target weed in North America for classical biological control (Crompton et al, 1990) is a toxic deep-rooted herbaceous (Gassmann & Schroeder, 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service 2013 Ranking Period 1
    United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service 2013 Ranking Period 1 Water Quality Enhancement Activity – WQL01 – Biological suppression and other non-chemical techniques to manage brush, herbaceous weeds and invasive species Enhancement Description This enhancement is for the reduction of woody brush, herbaceous weeds and invasive plants using non- chemical methods. Physical methods include pulling, hoeing, mowing, mulching or other similar techniques. Biological methods include use of natural enemies either introduced or augmented. Use of chemicals is prohibited with this enhancement. Land Use Applicability Pastureland, Rangeland, Forestland Benefits Environmental benefits will be site specific. Benefits may include but are not limited to improved water quality achieved through eliminating the use of synthetic pesticides resulting in no chemicals in surface runoff or leaching into the soil profile. Air quality will see similar impacts by eliminating chemical drift and volatilization. Controlling invasive species, brush and weeds will allow native plant communities to return and improve wildlife habitat. Conditions Where Enhancement Applies This enhancement applies to all pasture, range or forest land use acres. Criteria 1. Develop a plan for managing invasive plants, brush and/or weeds that includes: a. Assessment of existing conditions, b. Identify strategies for control, c. Control methods selected, d. Monitoring and evaluation process, and e. Operation and maintenance follow up activities. 2. Implementation of this enhancement requires the use of biological and/or physical pest suppression techniques instead of pesticides. These techniques, used individually or in combination, can include activities such as: a. Grazing animals (primarily through the use of goats) to target undesirable vegetation. b.
    [Show full text]
  • Microlepidoptera.Hu Redigit: Fazekas Imre
    Microlepidoptera.hu Redigit: Fazekas Imre 5 2012 Microlepidoptera.hu A magyar Microlepidoptera kutatások hírei Hungarian Microlepidoptera News A journal focussed on Hungarian Microlepidopterology Kiadó—Publisher: Regiograf Intézet – Regiograf Institute Szerkesztő – Editor: Fazekas Imre, e‐mail: [email protected] Társszerkesztők – Co‐editors: Pastorális Gábor, e‐mail: [email protected]; Szeőke Kálmán, e‐mail: [email protected] HU ISSN 2062–6738 Microlepidoptera.hu 5: 1–146. http://www.microlepidoptera.hu 2012.12.20. Tartalom – Contents Elterjedés, biológia, Magyarország – Distribution, biology, Hungary Buschmann F.: Kiegészítő adatok Magyarország Zygaenidae faunájához – Additional data Zygaenidae fauna of Hungary (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae) ............................... 3–7 Buschmann F.: Két új Tineidae faj Magyarországról – Two new Tineidae from Hungary (Lepidoptera: Tineidae) ......................................................... 9–12 Buschmann F.: Új adatok az Asalebria geminella (Eversmann, 1844) magyarországi előfordulásához – New data Asalebria geminella (Eversmann, 1844) the occurrence of Hungary (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae, Phycitinae) .................................................................................................. 13–18 Fazekas I.: Adatok Magyarország Pterophoridae faunájának ismeretéhez (12.) Capperia, Gillmeria és Stenoptila fajok új adatai – Data to knowledge of Hungary Pterophoridae Fauna, No. 12. New occurrence of Capperia, Gillmeria and Stenoptilia species (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae) ……………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Sesiidae)
    The Type-Material of Central and South American Clearwing Moths (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) W. DONALD DUCKWORTH and THOMAS D. EICHLIN SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 261 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoo/ogy Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Acta Entomologica Slovenica, 28 (1), 2020 Valcev J.A
    ACTA ENTOMO LOGICA SL OVENICA LJUBLJANA, JUNIJ 2020 Vol. 28, øt. 1: 5 –14 REVIDIRAN SEZNAM STEKLOKRILCEV (LEPIDOPTERA: SESIIDAE) SLOVENIJE Željko Predovnik ob železnici 82, 3313 Polzela, Slovenia, e-mail: [email protected] Izvleček – na osnovi lastnih večletnih raziskav favne steklorilcev v obdobju 1998 – 2019 ter podatkov iz muzejskih zbirk, sem pripravil nov revidiran seznam stek - lokrilcev Slovenije, kjer sem z najdbami zanesljivo potrdil skupno 44 vrst. navajam komentarje k vrstam, ki jih, zaradi pomanjkljivih literaturnih navedb in odsotnosti dokaznega materiala, v nov seznam nisem vključil. razpravljam tudi o vrstah, ki so prisotne v favnah sosednjih dežel in jih pri nas morda lahko pričakujemo. revidiran seznam steklokrilcev Slovenije je usklajen z najnovejšimi taksonomskimi spremem - bami v evropi. ključne beSede : lepidoptera, Sesiidae, Slovenija, seznam vrst, favna. Abstract – reviSed CHeCkliST oF CleArWinG MoTHS (lePidoPTerA: SeSiidAe) oF SloveniA based on own research of the fauna of clearwing moths in the period 1998 – 2019, as well as data from museums collections, a new revised list of clearwing moths of Slovenia is presented, whereby a total of 44 species have been reliably confirmed. Comments are given on species that were not included in the new list due to insufficient references and lack of material evidence. i also discuss species that are present in the fauna of neighboring countries and may be expected in Slovenia. The revised list of clearwing moths of Slovenia is in line with recent changes in taxonomy in europe. key WordS : lepidoptera, Sesiidae, Slovenia, checklist, fauna. Uvod kljub dolgi in razviti entomološki tradiciji je zgodovinskih najdb steklokrilcev, v primerjavi z ostalimi metulji v Sloveniji, malo.
    [Show full text]
  • Lep., Sesiidae)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte Jahr/Year: 1997/1998 Band/Volume: 41 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kallies Axel Artikel/Article: Synopsis der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland nachgewiesenen Glasflügler-Arten (Lep., Sesiidae). 107-111 © Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte; downloadEntomologische unter www.biologiezentrum.at Nachrichten und Berichte, 41,1997/2 107 A. K a l l ie s , Schwerin Synopsis der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland nachgewiesenen Glasflügler-Arten (Lep., Sesiidae)* Zusammenfassung Es wird eine Synopsis der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland nachgewiesenen Glasflüg­ lerarten vorgelegt, in der die Nachweise in Tabellenform für die einzelnen Bundesländer aufgeschlüsselt werden. Da sich die Kenntnisse der Biologie und Verbreitung der Glasflügler in den letzten 10 Jahren enorm erweitert ha­ ben, sind viele der Einzeldaten, auf deren Grundlage die vorliegende Übersicht erarbeitet wurde, sehr aktuell und noch nicht publiziert worden. Insgesamt wurden in Deutschland 35 Glasflüglerarten nachgewiesen. Davon wurden 33 Arten aktuell in mindestens einem Bundesland gefunden. Zwei Arten Bembecia( megillaeformis (H übner ) und Chamaesphecia annellata (Z eller )) konnten seit etwa 40 Jahren nicht mehr beobachtet werden, sie gelten als ver­ schollen. Meldungen für weitere 4 Arten sind sehr zweifelhaft und vermutlich auf Fehldeterminationen zurückzu­ führen. Diese Arten sind nicht Teil der
    [Show full text]