PDF (Volume 2)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PDF (Volume 2) Durham E-Theses Latin elegy as a genre of dissent. Chapman, Sydney Thompson How to cite: Chapman, Sydney Thompson (1977) Latin elegy as a genre of dissent., Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1861/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk .. a ; BEST COPY AVAILABLE Variable print quality UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM LOW EGY ASAi OF DISSR ! (Two Volume) 1 TBESIS SUNIITW BY SIDUT THoXP3OJ CRLFML B. A. To THN DEPA ' of CL&$SICS FOR SM DDGRI of DOCTOR©F PSIL©BOPBT 9t1nr 2 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. TABZE OF COMER (Yo1mw Two) CHLPTIR3 Pon SOCIAL AND POLITICAL DISS IT il TIM BI GISTS Part One TYs Ro1sstion of 'Anbitio' in Latin Eloaº 3 Iatriduatioa " ......................................... " Gallus, Tibullas, and Poatis Capitalisation ............ 5 Me Seed. Ellgiao Iatraasiglas. of " ........ " "......... "8 10 Sesial Reaaleitranss is Ovid ........................... Ovid 18 The säoas of Withdrawal is Propertias and ......... 28 Tibulluu' Philosophical Basis for Rotrsat .............. 41 Bxprossiens of Disillusion is Tibullus ................. Part ? wo BI! R sad Politisal Eeoriain: tiea 53 Intreduotion .................... ....................... 55 Proportias and the Parthian question ................... 61 The Proportian View of Lotion .......................... 68 The Politisai Import of Tiballis 1.7 ................... 73 Ireq is Ti lvs 2.5 and iAviYss ...................... ?9 A Political Zeki is Tibullss 1.1 ....................... 81 The Military Nstapior as Pelitieal ]Jequitia ............ " Prop. rtiust 1 sr Armtun .................. 89 Propertiuss A. sr Trinspbater .............. 10k Tiballtu ..................... "............. 107 Hesse ..................................... 109 Ovid ......... .............. 4000 ***Go 9000 0000 Chapter Three 223 lots 8stsr1N/ for ". s". " Pa CHAPTER 4 IRREVERENCE AND IN!. RALITY 143 Introduction............ ........................... Immorality: Counter-indictment in Elegy........... 149 Rural Ethic 167 Elegy and the .......................... 'Orbitas' versus 'Ubertas'......................... 187 Freedom and Repression............................. 198 '8ervitium' 218 Role Inversion and ..................... The Use of Marital and Related Terminology and its Implications 235 260 Note References for Chapter Four ............. 272 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................ CHAPTER T1 E SOCIAL AND POLITICAL DISSIIT IN THE ELEGISTS Contents of Chanter Three Part One The Rejection of 'Aebitio' in Latin Elegy Introduction Gallus. Tibulluse and Poet ic Capitalisation The Seeds of Eleg iac Intra nsiree noe Social Recaloitra nee in Ovid The Ttiees of Withdrawal in Proae rtius and Ovid Tibulln s' Philoson hioal Basis fo r Retreat Express ions of Dis illusion in Ti bullus Part Elegy and Political Reariaination Introduction Properties and the Parthian Question The Pro vertian Ti.,, of Aotiu* The Pol itical Import of Tibnllus 1.7 Irony g ad 'Lov itas' in Tiballus 2.5 A Polit ical ec ho in Tiballus 1.1 The 1Oili tarr IIfstanho r as Political 119%uitia' P"vsý: Amor Arustus Provortius: L or Trius stor Tibullus Hoac Ovid lote Referenoe" for Ch. ter Three 3" The Rejection of'Ambitio' in Latin Elegy Introduction In the former of the two major divisions into which this chapter is divided I shall be concerned with showing how the elegists can be said to have been socially removed from the spirit of their times. The enquiry will begin by demonstrating that they were dis- orientated from an establishment point of view in that they rejected the constraints placed upon the class of society to with h they belonged, voiced their dissent through their verse, and made it clear that they did not wish to be subjected to Augustus' policy of social engineering. This will not take into account the imperial plan for moral reform to which the elegista ran counter, for I intend to treat this issue in its own right in my final chapter. The word ambitio' will be employed on several occasions not, however, in (l) the narrow sense of canvassing for support at elections, but with the wider meaning of the will to embark upon and succeed in a chosen career in the service of the state. Icy information for the social background in the early stage of the chapter, probing the 'ordo equester' and the modifications which the emperor brought to bear upon it, rely upon the work of Syme and an article by Taylor (T. A. P. A. 211968, pp. 469-86) the latter of whom has summarised the reasons for our crediting all of the elegists with possession of equestrian status (pp. 479-81). Propertius, it will be seen, was content to acknowledge the advantages of peace afforded by the emperor but resented any interference by the state with the private lives of its citizens. Tibullus likewise welcomes the advent of peace while remaining sceptical about the way of life which thrives upon it. The evidence does not warrant our view of his as a 4. professional soldier making 'poetical capital' out of the military (2) life which he professes to dislike as Williams, for instance, would claim. I shall show that he seeks to justify his projected way of life with an appeal to philosophy, in particular that of Lucretius, by reworking sections of his Epicurean tract in a way which, to the best of my knowledge, has not been previously appreciated. In his opinion, a life devoted to 'amor' can have a rational basis and is not a senseless escape from social responsibility. Ovid shares with Tibullus and Propertius a distaste for a career in the service of the state and provides us with autobiographical information about his intentions in choosing to devote his energies to becoming a poet. His predecessors in elegiac poetry were, I suspect, motivated by considerations not entirely dissimilar. In the latter major section of the chapter I shall examine the political aspect of the elegists' verse; a separate introduction will be found prefacing this area of enquiry. I 5. Gallus. Tibullus, and Poetic Cavitalisation In an enquiry into the elegists' rejection of the responsibilities involved in pursuing a career in the service of the Augustan state the influence of Gallus as an elegist and man of action should be considered. His undertaking of the military life is at variance with the anti-militaristic thought expressed in Latin elegy. He almost certainly exploited the contrast between the life of the lover and that of the soldier if Eclogues 10 is an example of Callan subject matter and mode of expression. Lycoris, whom Gallus celebrated in his 'Amores', had been the mistress of Marcus Brutus and then of Marcus Antonius, both great men of action. In Eclogues 10 Vergil portrays Lycoris as attracted by a man of action, a soldier, with the result that she deserts Gallus in order to pursue her new love on a campaign in the North. We will never know to what extent this is biographical even if Servius was correct in deriving the words attributed to Gallus in the Eclogue from his (3), elegies but it is possible that Gallus may have felt drawn by feelings of inferiority - one thinks of Crassus at the time of the first triumvirate - to embark upon an even more enterprising military career in order to regain favour with Lycoris. Even though this is hypothetical, the elegists who succeeded him, had before them the example of a love elegist whose military ambitions had gone beyond bounds acceptable to the establishment with the result that he drove himself to suicide to escape the worst. This event in itself could have affected the elegists' attitude to militarism. Gallus had probably drawn the distinction between the otiose life of a lover (of-10-32-49 and that of a soldier as we find it in the Eclogue, where submission to 'amor', the affection, clashes with 'amor duri 6. Martis' - the demands of military affairs). In view of his fate, a life devoted to 'amor' began to make practical sense and the profession of unwillingness to lead a life of adventure ceased to be a mere literary conceit and was borne out in reality in the lives of (4) Tibullus, Propertiua and Ovid. Williams would take issue with such an argument applied to Tibullus, believing that he, like Gallus, made 'poetic capital' out of his profession as a soldier and poet; he could, as a soldier, decry more effectively the military life as opposed to an idyllic pastoral existence alongside his mistress than if he were a 'civilian' with no barrier preventing him from realising his dream. To this I would reply that the evidence that Tibullus was a professional soldier to any degree is meagre to say the least, consisting of the statement in the 'Vita' that 'ante slice Corvinum Messalam oratorem dilexit, cuius etiam contubernalis Aquitanioo bello militaribus donis donatus est' consonant with Tibullus' claim in 1.7.9 that 'non sine me eat tibi partus honos' where the poet relates how he served Messalla well in the Lquitanian campaign for which he was rewarded. Elegy 1.3 records how he was unable to proceed to the East as a member of the 'cohors' of Messalls for he fell ill at Corcyra; when I subject this poem to criticism it will become clear that Tibullue was so diffident towards the prospect of the expedition and harboured feelings of resentment that he had actually been involved in it in the first place, that the possibility of any professional interest on his part is unlikely.
Recommended publications
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • Stoicism and the Virtue of Toleration
    STOICISM AND THE VIRTUE OF TOLERATION John Lombardini1 Abstract: This article argues that the Stoics possessed a conception of toleration as a personal and social virtue. In contrast with previous scholarship, I argue that such a conception of toleration only emerges as a product of the novel conceptions of the vir- tue of endurance offered by Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius. The first section provides a survey of the Stoic conception of endurance in order to demonstrate how the distinc- tive treatments of endurance in Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius merit classification of a conception of toleration; the second section offers a brief reconstruction of the argu- ments for toleration in the Meditations. Introduction In his history of the concept of toleration, Rainer Forst identifies its earliest articulation with the use of tolerantia in Stoic philosophy. Though the word tolerantia first occurs in Cicero, it is used to explicate Stoic doctrine. In the Paradoxa Stoicorum, Cicero identifies the tolerantia fortunae (the endurance of what befalls one) as a virtue characteristic of the sage, and connects it with a contempt for human affairs (rerum humanarum contemptione);2 in De Finibus, endurance (toleratio) is contrasted with Epicurus’ maxim that severe pain is brief while long-lasting pain is light as a truer method for dealing with pain.3 Seneca, in his Epistulae Morales, also identifies tolerantia as a virtue, defending it as such against those Stoics who maintain that a strong endurance (fortem tolerantiam) is undesirable, and linking it
    [Show full text]
  • Mythological Intertextuality in Nineteenth Century Ballet Repertory
    Skidmore College Creative Matter MALS Final Projects, 1995-2019 MALS 5-20-2006 Mythological Intertextuality in Nineteenth Century Ballet Repertory Liane Fisher Skidmore College Follow this and additional works at: https://creativematter.skidmore.edu/mals_stu_schol Part of the Dance Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Fisher, Liane, "Mythological Intertextuality in Nineteenth Century Ballet Repertory" (2006). MALS Final Projects, 1995-2019. 41. https://creativematter.skidmore.edu/mals_stu_schol/41 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the MALS at Creative Matter. It has been accepted for inclusion in MALS Final Projects, 1995-2019 by an authorized administrator of Creative Matter. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mythological Intertextuality in Nineteenth Century Ballet Repertory Master of Arts in Liberal Studies Thesis Skidmore College Liane Fisher March 2006 Advisor: Isabel Brown Reader: Marc Andre Wiesmann Table of Contents Abstract .............................. ... .... .......................................... .......... ............................ ...................... 1 Chapter 1 : Introduction .. .................................................... ........... ..... ............ ..... ......... ............. 2 My thologyand Ballet ... ....... ... ........... ................... ....... ................... ....... ...... .................. 7 The Labyrinth My thologies .. ......................... .... ................. ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1996
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 12 | 1999 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1996 Angelos Chaniotis, Joannis Mylonopoulos and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/724 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.724 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 1999 Number of pages: 207-292 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis, Joannis Mylonopoulos and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou, « Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1996 », Kernos [Online], 12 | 1999, Online since 13 April 2011, connection on 15 September 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/724 Kernos Kemos, 12 (1999), p. 207-292. Epigtoaphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1996 (EBGR 1996) The ninth issue of the BEGR contains only part of the epigraphie harvest of 1996; unforeseen circumstances have prevented me and my collaborators from covering all the publications of 1996, but we hope to close the gaps next year. We have also made several additions to previous issues. In the past years the BEGR had often summarized publications which were not primarily of epigraphie nature, thus tending to expand into an unavoidably incomplete bibliography of Greek religion. From this issue on we return to the original scope of this bulletin, whieh is to provide information on new epigraphie finds, new interpretations of inscriptions, epigraphieal corpora, and studies based p;imarily on the epigraphie material. Only if we focus on these types of books and articles, will we be able to present the newpublications without delays and, hopefully, without too many omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Coins – Mass Media for Image Cultivation
    Roman Coins – Mass Media for Image Cultivation Unlike modern coins, Roman money was characterized by an enormous diversity of coin images. This reflected not so much the desire for change, however, but rather an often very purposeful policy of concrete self-interests. At the time of the Roman Republic, coins were issued on behalf of the senate by a committee of moneyers. These men decided independently what motifs their coins were to bear, and, from the late 2nd century BC, used this liberty often for family propaganda. Later, during the time of the Firs and second triumvirate (60 to 32 BC), coins were issued by several powerful Romans or their adherents. These pieces were not republican any more, but imperatorial, and used mainly for the representation of political dispositions and ambitions. In imperial times finally (from 27 BC), the rulers of Rome were in charge of the issuance of money. Naturally, they used the large Roman coins for the artful conversion of political propaganda and self-manifestation as well. 1 von 20 www.sunflower.ch Roman Republic, L. Caecilius Metellus Diadematur (or Delmaticus), Denarius, 128 BC Denomination: Denarius Mint Authority: Moneyer Lucius Caecilius Metellus Diadematus (?) Mint: Rome Year of Issue: -128 Weight (g): 3.94 Diameter (mm): 18.0 Material: Silver Owner: Sunflower Foundation This denarius bears on the obverse a traditional motif, the head of Roma, the goddess and personification of Rome, wearing a winged attic helmet; behind her is the mark XVI for the value of 16 asses. The reverse depicts a goddess driving a biga, a two-horse racing chariot.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Virginia State Finals Kick-Off Certamen Level II NOTE to MODERATORS: in Answers, Information in Parentheses Is Optional Extra Information
    2016 Virginia State Finals Kick-Off Certamen Level II NOTE TO MODERATORS: in answers, information in parentheses is optional extra information. A slash ( / ) indicates an alternate answer. Underlined portions of a longer, narrative answer indicate required information. ROUND ONE 1. TOSSUP: If a teacher said to her student, “Claude iānuam!” what would an obedient student do? ANS: CLOSE THE DOOR BONUS: What Latin word or words, translated as “please,” could the teacher add to that statement to be more polite? ANS: QUAESŌ / SI TIBI PLACET 2. TOSSUP: Which group in mythology haunted Orestes for slaying his own mother Clytemnestra? ANS: FURIES/ERINYES/EUMENIDES BONUS: The Furies, along with the Giants and the nymphs of the ash trees, sprang from the earth when whose blood fertilized it after he was castrated by Cronus? ANS: OURANOS’ 3. TOSSUP: If you were to describe someone as having capillōs sōrdidōs, what would you be saying about them? ANS: THAT THEY HAD DIRTY HAIR BONUS: Where on your body might you find supercilia? ANS: ABOVE YOUR EYES/ON YOUR FOREHEAD (note to moderator, they are eyebrows). 4. TOSSUP: According to legend, what Roman noblewoman's suicide following her rape led to the expulsion of the Tarquins? ANS: LUCRETIA BONUS: Who had raped her? ANS: SEXTUS (TARQUINIUS) /SON OF TARQUINIUS SUPERBUS 5. TOSSUP: What use of the genitive case is found in the sentence, Mārcus miser nihil vīnī habēbat? ANS: PARTITIVE / OF THE WHOLE BONUS: Use a partitive genitive to translate “first of all” for this sentence: Sicily was the first province of all.” ANS: PRĪMA OMNIUM *PAUSE FOR SCORE UPDATE* 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Notes on Bona Dea & the Goddess Uni-A Survey of Etruscan
    Work notes on Bona Dea & the goddess Uni — a survey of Etruscan & Latin texts relating to the Pyrgi Gold Tablets By Mel Copeland (Relating to Etruscan Phrases texts) A work in progress November 15, 2014 The Etruscan goddess, Uni, Unia, has been identified with the Roman Juno and, on pottery and mirrors she is portrayed in mythological scenes involving the Greek goddess Hera. Although the Etruscans assigned their own peculiar names to the “Greek” pantheon, such as Tini, Tinia (L. Jupiter, Gr. Zeus), Uni, Unia (L. Juno, Gr. Hera), Turan (L. Venus, Gr. Aphrodite, and Thalna (Gr. Nemisis), many of the Greek characters are recorded with similar spelling in the Etruscan texts, such as Hercle, HerKle, (Gr. Herakles), These (Gr.Theseus), Akle (Gr. Achilles), Ektor (Gr. Hector), Aifas Telmonos (Gr. Ajax Telamonos), Elenei, Elinai (Gr. Helen [of Troy], Elchintre (Alexandar, Paris), Achmemon (Gr. Agememnon) Aeitheon (Gr. Jason) Aita (Gr. Hades) and Dis (Gr. another name of Hades: Dis) and his consort Phersipnei (Gr. Persephone). Because of the imagery used on vases and mirrors and the common Greek mythological themes, we can discern the names and grammatical conventions of Etruscan mythological characters. Because we know who the characters are for the most part and the context in which the Etruscans knew them, we can further understand pure textual documents of the Etruscans, such as the Pyrgi Gold tablets, which will be discussed later in this document, as it pertains to the Roman Feast of the 1st of May called Bona Dea. Uni was identified by the Romans as the Etruscan version of Juno, the consort of their supreme god, Jupiter (Etr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social and Political Context for Obstruction in Roman Love
    THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT FOR OBSTRUCTION IN ROMAN LOVE ELEGY by AMY K. LEONARD (Under the Direction of Charles Platter) ABSTRACT This thesis will examine the presence of erotic obstruction in the poems of the first century B.C. writers of Roman love elegy: Tibullus, Propertius and Ovid. While erotic poetry prior to this time period had long necessitated a sense of obstruction, the deliberate construction of a failed love-affair by the Roman elegists serves to define their particular use of obstruction as a unique discursive strategy. The observation has been made that the time period marking the emergence and disappearance of Roman elegy qualifies it as a discrete, time-bound genre. In light of these time considerations, the obstruction motif in elegy, as a means of articulating a continual sense of failure, is capable of giving involuntary voice to events taking place on the Roman socio-political front, specifically, as this thesis will argue, a perceived loss of autonomy under the changing political structures at the end of the Republic. INDEX WORDS: Obstruction, Roman love elegy, Tibullus, Propertius, Ovid, Door, Vir, Lena, Illness, Distance, Unfaithfulness, Amores 2.19, Amores 3.4 THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT FOR OBSTRUCTION IN ROMAN LOVE ELEGY by AMY KIRK LEONARD B.A., The University of Georgia, 1996 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2004 © 2004 Amy Kirk Leonard All Rights Reserved THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT FOR OBSTRUCTION IN ROMAN LOVE ELEGY by AMY KIRK LEONARD Major Professor: Charles Platter Committee: Keith Dix Nancy Felson Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2004 DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my husband, David Leonard, without whose unconditional support during my years in graduate school I would never have made it to the completion of this degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Literature Under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian
    Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian Literary Interactions, ad 96–138 Edited by Alice König and Christopher Whitton ROMAN LITE·RATURE UNDER NERVA, TRAJAN AND HADRIAN Literary Interactions, AD 96-I38 for John Henderson EDITED BY ALICE KÖNIG Univenity ofSt And~s, Scotland CHRISTOPHER WHITTON Univenity of Cambridge EI CAMBRIDGE ~ UNIVERSITY PRESS 20 /18 ROMAN LITERATURE UNDER NERVA, TRAJAN AND HADRIAN This volume is the first holistic investigation of Roman liceracure and literary culture under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian (AD 96-138). Wich case scudies from Frontinus, Juvenal, Martial, Pliny the Younger, Plutarch, Quintilian, Suetonius and Tacitus among others, the eigh­ teen chapters offer not just innovative readings ofliterary (and some 'less literary') texts, but a collaborative enquiry into the networks and culcure in which they are embedded. The book brings together estab­ lished and novel methodologies to explore the connections, conver­ sations and silences between these texts and their authors, both on and off the page. The scholarly dialogues that result not only shed fresh light on the dynamics of literary production and consumption in the 'High Roman Empire', but offer new provocations to students ofintercextuality and interdiscursivity across classical literature. How can and should we read textual interactions in their social, literary and cultural contexts? ALICE KÖNIG is Senior Lecturer in Classics at the University of St Andrews. Her research focuses on ancient technical literature and the history of science, and the relationship between politics, society and literature in the early principate. She is preparing a monograph on ehe author and statesman Sextus Julius Frontinus, and has published a series of articles on Vitruvius, Frontinus and Tacitus.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar
    Working Paper CEsA CSG 168/2018 ANCIENT ROMAN POLITICS – JULIUS CAESAR Maria SOUSA GALITO Abstract Julius Caesar (JC) survived two civil wars: first, leaded by Cornelius Sulla and Gaius Marius; and second by himself and Pompeius Magnus. Until he was stabbed to death, at a senate session, in the Ides of March of 44 BC. JC has always been loved or hated, since he was alive and throughout History. He was a war hero, as many others. He was a patrician, among many. He was a roman Dictator, but not the only one. So what did he do exactly to get all this attention? Why did he stand out so much from the crowd? What did he represent? JC was a front-runner of his time, not a modern leader of the XXI century; and there are things not accepted today that were considered courageous or even extraordinary achievements back then. This text tries to explain why it’s important to focus on the man; on his life achievements before becoming the most powerful man in Rome; and why he stood out from every other man. Keywords Caesar, Politics, Military, Religion, Assassination. Sumário Júlio César (JC) sobreviveu a duas guerras civis: primeiro, lideradas por Cornélio Sula e Caio Mário; e depois por ele e Pompeius Magnus. Até ser esfaqueado numa sessão do senado nos Idos de Março de 44 AC. JC foi sempre amado ou odiado, quando ainda era vivo e ao longo da História. Ele foi um herói de guerra, como outros. Ele era um patrício, entre muitos. Ele foi um ditador romano, mas não o único.
    [Show full text]
  • Haec Nobis Fingebamus: Tibullus, Ovid, and the Power of Imagination
    Haec Nobis Fingebamus: Tibullus, Ovid, and the Power of Imagination This paper will explore the parallel uses of imagination in two elegiac poems: Tibullus 1.5 and Ovid’s Tristia 4.2. In poem 1.5, Tibullus depicts a scene in which he and his beloved Delia live a pleasant life together in the countryside, far from the greed and rivals of the city. Eventually, however, he must admit that he was imagining it all (haec mihi fingebam, Tib. 1.5.35) and later reveals that he is in fact still locked out of his beloved’s house in the city. In Tristia 4.2, Ovid similarly uses his imagination to place himself back in Rome during Tiberius’ German triumph. He, too, must eventually admit that this is only possible in his imagination (at mihi fingendo, Trist. 4.2.67), due to the reality of his exile. A number of scholars have discussed Tibullus’ fantasies in poem 1.5 and have tended to focus on the ultimate failure of these fantasies (see Luck 1969, Ross 1975, Lyne 1980, Lee- Stecum 1998). Scholars of Ovid’s exile poetry, meanwhile, have argued that Ovid’s imagination in these poems provides him with mental access to Rome in spite of his physical absence (see Edwards 1996; Claassen 1999, 2008; Hardie 2002). My paper will refine this view of Ovid’s exile poetry by reading it in tandem with Tibullus 1.5 rather than on its own. I will argue that Ovid’s imagination in Tristia 4.2 turns out to be as ineffectual as Tibullus’ in 1.5, and functions as a failed fantasy in line with Tibullus’ earlier model.
    [Show full text]