DOCSLIB.ORG

UNEP-Kirja 1 Osa.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNEP-Kirja 1 Osa.Indd International Environmental Law-making and Diplomacy Review 2004 Marko Berglund (editor) UNIVERSITY OF JOENSUU – UNEP COURSE SERIES 1 University of Joensuu Joensuu 2005 University of Joensuu - UNEP Course Series 1 Publisher University of Joensuu Department of Law P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 JOENSUU, FINLAND Editor Marko Berglund Editorial Tuomas Kuokkanen, Elizabeth Maruma Mrema, Board Akpezi Ogbuigwe Contact Joensuu University Library/Sales of Publications P.O. Box 107, FI-80101 JOENSUU, FINLAND Tel. +358-13-251 2652, +358-13-251 4509 Fax +358-13-251 2691 E-mail: joepub@joensuu.fi http://www.joensuu.fi/library United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Division of Environmental Policy Implementation (DEPI) P.O. Box 30552, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.unep.org/training Exchanges Joensuu University Library/Exchanges P.O. Box 107, FI-80101 JOENSUU, FINLAND Tel. +358-13-251 2677 Fax +358-13-251 2691 E-mail: vaihdot@joensuu.fi ISSN 1795-6706 ISBN 952-458-664-9 Cover Design Leea Wasenius Layout Erja Koponen Joensuun yliopistopaino Joensuu 2005 Contents FOREWORD .............................................................................................................v PREFACE .................................................................................................................vi ABBREVIATIONS .....................................................................................................ix PART I INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL DIPLOMACY AND GOVERNANCE .................................................................................1 INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL DIPLOMACY ............................................3 Shafqat Kakakhel THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE ...............................................................................19 Donald Kaniaru SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM .........................................................................................................31 Johannah Bernstein PART II INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW-MAKING AND REGIMES ...........................................................................................51 THE TREATY-MAKING PROCESS AND BASIC CONCEPTS OF TREATY LAW ....................................................................................................53 Päivi Kaukoranta AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SOURCES, PRINCIPLES AND REGIMES OF INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW .........................................................61 Marc Pallemaerts MULTILATERAL ENVIRONMENTAL NEGOTIATION ...........................................73 Brook Boyer GLOBAL AND REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND DYNAMICS ...........81 Frits Schlingemann INTERNATIONAL LEGAL REGIMES FOR THE ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS AND WASTE: A PRACTITIONER’S PERSPECTIVE ........................................................................89 Sachiko Kuwabara-Yamamoto iii CONTENTS THE ROLE OF NGOS AND NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS IN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW-MAKING ........................................................................103 Heidi Hautala THE NEGOTIATIONS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WTO RULES AND MEAS: THE STORY SO FAR ..........................................................................109 Tuula Varis PART III COMPLIANCE ............................................................................................115 INTRODUCTION TO THE DISCUSSION ON COMPLIANCE ..................................117 Patrick Széll IMPLEMENTATION, COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OF MEAS: UNEP’S ROLE ......................................................................................125 Elizabeth Maruma Mrema ANNEX: GUIDELINES ON COMPLIANCE WITH AND ENFORCEMENT OF MULTILATERAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS ......................................136 PART IV SPECIAL THEME: WATER ........................................................................151 WORLD WATER RESOURCES AND PROBLEMS ...................................................153 Esko Kuusisto INTERNATIONAL LAW AND WATER ...................................................................167 Tuomas Kuokkanen INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT: INTERNATIONAL FRESHWATER AGREEMENTS AND NATIONAL WATER POLICY AND LAW REFORMS ..................................................................179 Niels Ipsen and Marko Berglund WATER CO-OPERATION BETWEEN FINLAND AND RUSSIA ON THE LOCAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL ............................................................................189 Anna-Liisa Tanskanen PART V INTERACTIVE EXERCISE INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND GOVERNANCE: WHERE NEXT? ..........................................................................................197 FUNDAMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS ......................................................199 Ed Couzens CLUSTERING OF MEAS .........................................................................................207 Kong Xiangwen DOES THE WORLD NEED A SUPER-COP? INTEGRATED GLOBAL DECISION-MAKING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ..............................................................................211 Cam Carruthers iv Foreword The articles in the present Review are based on lectures given during the first Univer- sity of Joensuu – UNEP Course on International Environmental Law-making and Diplomacy, which was held from 22 August to 3 September 2004 in Joensuu, Finland. The Course was a concrete outcome of the co-operation between the University of Joensuu and UNEP to advance the implementation of local, regional and global objec- tives agreed at the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development and enhance the capacities of future negotiators in international negotiations. The aim of the Course was to convey key tools and experiences in the area of inter- national environmental law-making to present and future negotiators of multilateral environmental agreements. In addition, the Course served as a forum for fostering North-South co-operation and for taking stock of recent developments in the nego- tiation and implementation of multilateral environmental agreements and diplomatic practices in the field. The Course is intended to be an annual event designed for experienced government officials engaged in international environmental negotiations. In addition, other stake- holders such as representatives of non-governmental organizations and the private sector may apply and be selected to attend the Course. Researchers and academics in the field are also eligible. Altogether 36 participants from 28 countries, with an equal distribution from the North and South, participated in the first Course. We would like to express our gratitude to all of those who contributed to the successful outcome of the first Course. It gives us great pleasure to recognize that the lectures and presentations given during the Course are now recorded in this Review. We are grateful that the authors were willing to take on an extra burden after the Course and transfer their presentations into article form thereby making the Review such a useful resource. In addition, we would like to thank Marko Berglund for skilful editing of the Review and the Editorial Board for providing guidance in the editing work. Professor Perttu Vartiainen Dr. Klaus Töpfer Rector of the University of Joensuu Executive Director of UNEP v Preface The current Review seeks to provide practical guidance, professional perspective and historical background to practitioners, stakeholders and researchers working in the area of international environmental law-making and diplomacy. The Review high- lights dominating doctrines, approaches and techniques in the field, including sustain- able development, regime-building, governance, synergy, compliance and the role of NGOs. Moreover, the inaugural volume focuses on water as a specific theme. The lectures of the first University of Joensuu – UNEP Course, from which the arti- cles in the present Review emanate, were delivered by experienced hands-on diplo- mats, government officials and members of academia.1 One of the main purposes of the Course was to take advantage of the practical experiences of experts working in the field of international environmental law-making and diplomacy. Consequently, the articles in this Review and the different approaches taken by the authors reflect the lecturers’ and resource persons’ diverse professional backgrounds. Marko Berglund edited the Review and helped prepare some of the articles by writing draft versions based on the lectures and presentations given by the speakers. General editing tasks included checking the style and content of the submissions and providing research assistance by checking, adding and editing references and footnotes. All Internet references were valid as of 15 March 2005. The present Review is divided into five sections. Part I addresses general issues relating to international environmental diplomacy and governance. Shafqat Kakakhel’s article presents an overview of developments in international environmental diplomacy and addresses current challenges in the field. Donald Kaniaru focuses on the concept of sustainable development in more detail and shows how it is being applied in practice. Johannah Bernstein presents the current challenges of sustainable development gover- nance and possible ways forward. 1 Information on the University of Joensuu – UNEP Course on International Environmental Law-making and Diplomacy is available at www.joensuu.fi/unep/envlaw. vi PREFACE Part II addresses in more detail international environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustainability Assessment and Reporting for the University of Michigan's Ann Arbor Campus
    Report No. CSS02-04 April 2002 Sustainability Assessment and Reporting for the University of Michigan's Ann Arbor Campus Sandra I. Rodriguez, Matthew S. Roman, Samantha C. Sturhahn & Elizabeth H. Terry Sustainability Assessment and Reporting for the University of Michigan's Ann Arbor Campus By: Sandra I. Rodriguez Matthew S. Roman Samantha C. Sturhahn Elizabeth H. Terry A project submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Natural Resources and Environment) University of Michigan Ann Arbor April, 2002 Faculty Advisors: Professor Jonathan W. Bulkley Associate Research Scientist Gregory A. Keoleian A report of the Center for Sustainable Systems Report No. CSS02-04 Document Description SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN'S ANN ARBOR CAMPUS Sandra I. Rodriguez, Matthew S. Roman, Samantha C. Sturhahn & Elizabeth H. Terry Center for Sustainable Systems, Report No. CSS02-04 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan April, 2002 415 pp., tables, figures, 48 appendices This document is available online at: http://css.snre.umich.edu Center for Sustainable Systems School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Michigan 440 Church Street, Dana Building Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1041 Phone: 734-764-1412 Fax: 734-647-5841 Email: [email protected] Web: http://css.snre.umich.edu © Copyright 2002 by the Regents of the University of Michigan The University of Michigan Sustainability Assessment and Reporting Team would like to recognize the invaluable guidance of Dr. Jonathan W. Bulkley and Dr. Gregory A. Keoleian (Center for Sustainable Systems), without whose support this project would not have been possible. In addition, we would also like to thank our client, the University of Michigan Facilities and Operations, and specifically the project liaison, Occupational Safety and Environmental Health Department (OSEH), represented by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development and the 2002 World Summit
    RESEARCH PAPER 02/55 Sustainable Development 10TH OCTOBER 2002 and the 2002 World Summit The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1992, commonly referred to as the Earth Summit, initiated several large commitments to the global environment. In August 2002, the World Summit on Sustainable Development (also referred to as Rio +10) was held in Johannesburg to review the progress made over the ten years since the Earth Summit. The summit was widely considered to have achieved little progress. This paper looks at the concept of sustainability and the action being taken by the UK to address some of the commitments made in 1992. Stephen McGinness SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT SECTION Patsy Richards ECONOMIC POLICY AND STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: 02/40 Cross border shopping and smuggling 21.06.02 02/41 Modernisation of the House of Commons: Sitting hours 27.06.02 02/42 Economic Indicators [includes article: Housing market overheating] 01.07.02 02/43 The Burden of Taxation 09.07.02 02/44 Inflation: the value of the pound 1750-2001 11.07.02 02/45 The Euro-Zone: The early years & UK convergence 16.07.02 02/46 Unemployment by Constituency, June 2002 17.07.02 02/47 The Mobile Telephones (Re-programming) Bill [HL Bill 177 of 2001-02] 18.07.02 02/48 Defence Statistics – July 2002 19.07.02 02/49 Unemployment by Constituency, July 2002 15.08.02 02/50 Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) 22.08.02 02/51 Unemployment by Constituency, August 2002 11.09.02 02/52 Detention of suspected
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Next Wave Festival
    November 2005 2005 Next Wave Festival Mary Heilmann, Last Chance for Gas Study (detail), 2005 BAM 2005 Next Wave Festival is sponsored by: The PerformingNCOREArts Magazine Altria 2005 ~ext Wave FeslliLaL Brooklyn Academy of Music Alan H. Fishman William I. Campbell Chairman of the Board Vice Chairman of the Board Karen Brooks Hopkins Joseph V. Melillo President Executive Prod ucer presents Symphony No.6 (Plutonian Ode) & Symphony No.8 by Philip Glass Bruckner Orchestra Linz Approximate BAM Howard Gilman Opera House running time: Nov 2,4 & 5, 2005 at 7:30pm 1 hour, 40 minutes, one intermission Conducted by Dennis Russell Davies Soprano Lauren Flanigan Symphony No.8 - World Premiere I II III -intermission- Symphony No. 6 (Plutonian Ode) I II III BAM 2005 Next Wave Festival is sponsored by Altria Group, Inc. Major support for Symphonies 6 & 8 is provided by The Robert W Wilson Foundation, with additional support from the Austrian Cultural Forum New York. Support for BAM Music is provided by The Aaron Copland Fund for Music, Inc. Yamaha is the official piano for BAM. Dennis Russell Davies, Thomas Koslowski Horns Executive Director conductor Gerda Fritzsche Robert Schnepps Dr. Thomas Konigstorfer Aniko Biro Peter KeserU First Violins Severi n Endelweber Thomas Fischer Artistic Director Dr. Heribert Schroder Heinz Haunold, Karlheinz Ertl Concertmaster Cellos Walter Pauzenberger General Secretary Mario Seriakov, Elisabeth Bauer Christian Pottinger Mag. Catharina JUrs Concertmaster Bernhard Walchshofer Erha rd Zehetner Piotr Glad ki Stefa n Tittgen Florian Madleitner Secretary Claudia Federspieler Mitsuaki Vorraber Leopold Ramerstorfer Elisabeth Winkler Vlasta Rappl Susanne Lissy Miklos Nagy Bernadett Valik Trumpets Stage Crew Peter Beer Malva Hatibi Ernst Leitner Herbert Hoglinger Jana Mooshammer Magdalena Eichmeyer Hannes Peer Andrew Wiering Reinhard Pirstinger Thomas Wall Regina Angerer- COLUMBIA ARTISTS Yuko Kana-Buchmann Philipp Preimesberger BrUndlinger MANAGEMENT LLC Gorda na Pi rsti nger Tour Direction: Gudrun Geyer Double Basses Trombones R.
    [Show full text]
  • HIV/AIDS: Geeta Rao Gupta
    I SSUE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE & 8 E SECURITY PROJECT REPORT NVIRONMENTAL ISSUE NO. 8 • THE WOODROW WILSON CENTER • SUMMER 2002 COMMENTARIES C What is to be Done at Johannesburg? HANGE Issues for the World Summit on Sustainable Development AND ARTICLES S Population, Poverty, and Vulnerability: Mitigating the Effects ECURITY of Natural Disasters George Martine and Jose Miguel Guzman P Migration, Population Change, and the Rural Environment ROJECT Richard E. Bilsborrow The Future of Environmental Security R Security and Ecology in the Age of Globalization EPORT Simon Dalby In Defense of Environment and Security Research Richard A. Matthew S UMMER SPECIAL REPORT Fire and Water: Technologies, Institutions, and Social Issues 2002 in Arms Control and Transboundary Water-Resources Agreements Elizabeth L. Chalecki, Peter H. Gleick, Kelli L. Larson, Arian L. Pregenzer, and Aaron T. Wolf The University of Michigan Plus: Reviews of New Publications, Official Statements, Population Fellows Programs ECSP Meeting Summaries, Organizational Updates, This publication is made possible through support provided by the Office of Population, U.S. Agency for International Development, and and Bibliography the University of Michigan, under the terms of Grant No. HRN-A-00-00-00001. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development, the University of Michigan, or the Woodrow Wilson Center. 89958mvpR3_Cover.p65 1 8/16/02, 11:18 AM The Woodrow Wilson International Center for ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE AND SECURITY PROJECT REPORT Scholars, located in the Ronald Reagan Building in the heart of Washington D.C., was founded in 1968 by Congress as the nation’s memorial to President Woodrow Wilson.
    [Show full text]
  • Premises of Sustainable Development Concept Occurence
    Land Forces Academy Review Vol. XXIV, No 1(93), 2019 PREMISES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OCCURENCE Elisabeta-Emilia HALMAGHI “Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy, Sibiu, Romania [email protected] Mihai-Marcel NEAG “Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy, Sibiu, Romania [email protected] ABSTRACT It has long been considered that the environment can withstand all the pressure exerted by human activities on it: extensive agriculture, pesticide use, strong industrialization, noxious gas emissions into the atmosphere, toxic product discharge into lakes, rivers, seas and oceans, massive deforestation to obtain new areas for housing or agriculture. The result was environmental and soil degradation, increased water and/or air pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, the disappearance of plant and/or animal species, the depletion of some natural resources. These environmental changes have begun to be studied by specialists in the field, who have raised a flag to irreversible environmental changes. The concept of “sustainable development” arose at a time when environmental issues were at the heart of political debate: sustainable development is seen as a complex and difficult issue to solve because there is a diversity of interests of different states. International agreements and cooperation from the point of view of globalization and economic harmonization have also had as their object the issues of sustainable development, by launching the attempt to reconcile the economy with the environment. KEYWORDS: sustainable development, environmental protection, Brundtland Report 1. Introduction Initially, the idea of sustainable Since the 1960s, both scientists in the development has started from the premise field of earth sciences or economics, as well that companies can grow economically by as scientific or fiction authors have begun protecting the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • E and G PM File 2005 Final
    © UNEP, 2005 Published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). ISBN: 92-807-2487-6 Job No.: DEW/0573/NA February 2005 DISCLAIMER This publication may be reproduced in whole or part and in any form of educational or non- proper services without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. For further information, please contact: Steve Lonergan Director Division of Early Warning and Assessment United Nations Environment Programme P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya Phone:+ 254 20 62 4028 Fax: + 254 20 62 3943 Email: [email protected] Beth Ingraham Information Officer Project Coordinator Division of Early Warning and Assessment United Nations Environment Programme P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya Phone:+ 254 20 62 4299 Fax: + 254 20 62 4269 Email: [email protected] Design and Layout: Audrey Ringler, DEWA Printing: UNON, Nairobi This book is printed on 100 per cent recycled, chlorine free paper Mainstreaming Gender in Environmental Assessment And Early Warning JONI SEAGER, PhD. DEAN OF THE FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES YORK UNIVERSITY, TORONTO, CANADA [email protected] and BETSY HARTMANN, PhD. DIRECTOR OF THE POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE, MASSACHUSETTS, USA [email protected] WITH RESEARCH ASSISTANCE FROM ROBIN ROTH AND SOLANGE BANDIAKY, CLARK UNIVERSITY Mainstreaming Gender in Environmental Assessment and Early Warning Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report on the Delta Alliance Young Professionals Award Activity
    7 6 Delta Alliance Young Professionals Award Innovative solutions for delta challenges worldwide Final report June 2014 Final report 2014 Delta Alliance Wim van Driel, Alterra To be cited as: Driel, W.F. van, 2014. Delta Alliance Young Professionals Award; Innovative solutions for delta challenges worldwide. Final report. Delta Alliance report no. 6, Wageningen, The Netherlands www.delta-alliance.org Delta Alliance Young Professionals Award: http://www.delta-alliance.org/ypa Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................1 2. Delta Alliance Young Professional Award (YPA) ...................................................................1 3. Activities ..................................................................................................................................2 3.1 Activities in 2011 ...............................................................................................................2 3.2 Activities 2012 ...................................................................................................................2 3.3 Activities in 2013 ...............................................................................................................9 4. In conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 12 ANNEXES/REFERENCES .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Space and Defense Issue
    33SPAC E and DEFENSE Volume Eleven Number One Spring 2019 China’s Military Space Strategy Sam Rouleau Volume Five Number One Communicating Cyber Consequences Sum Timothy Goines mer 2011 Why Brazil Ventured a Nuclear Program Saint-Clair Lima da Silva Arms Control & Deterrence Coalitions in Space:Damon Coletta Where Networks are CadetPower Voice—Curious Trinity: War, Media, Public Opinion byLaura James Olson Clay Moltz The 2010 National Space Policy: Down to Earth? by Joan Johnson-Freese Space & Defense Journal of the United States Air Force Academy Eisenhower Center for Space and Defense Studies Publisher Col. Kris Bauman, [email protected] Director, Eisenhower Center for Space and Defense Studies Editors Dr. Damon Coletta Dr. Michelle Black U.S. Air Force Academy, USA University of Nebraska, Omaha Associate Editors Mr. Deron Jackson Dr. Peter Hays U.S. Air Force Academy, USA George Washington University, USA Dr. Schuyler Foerster Ms. Jonty Kasku-Jackson U.S. Air Force Academy, USA National Security Space Institute, USA Thank You to Our Reviewers Andrew Aldrin Christopher Dunlap United Launch Alliance, USA Naval Postgraduate School, USA James Armor Paul Eckart ATK, USA Boeing, USA William Barry Andrew Erickson NASA Headquarters, USA Naval War College, USA Daniel Blinder Joanne Gabrynowicz UNSAM-CONICET, Argentina University of Mississippi, USA Robert Callahan Jason Healey NORAD-NORTHCOM, USA Atlantic Council, USA James Cameron Stephen Herzog Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Brazil Yale University, USA Robert Carriedo Theresa Hitchens U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Ecological Diplomacy
    Global Ecological Diplomacy 1 Earth Summits • The Earth Summit refers to the United Nations (UN) conferences organised to address issues concerning environmental protection and socio-economic development. • The Earth Summit is also a platform in which the world examines and evaluates the relationship between human rights, population, social development, women and human settlements. 2 • In 1992, more than 100 heads of state met in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for the first international Earth Summit convened to address urgent problems of environmental protection and socio-economic development. • The assembled leaders signed the Convention on Climate Change and the Convention on Biological Diversity, endorsed the Rio Declaration and the Forest Principles, and adopted Agenda 21, a 300 page plan for achieving sustainable development in the 21st century. • The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created to monitor and report on implementation of the Earth Summit agreements. 3 • It was agreed that a five year review of Earth Summit progress would be made in 1997 by the United Nations General Assembly meeting in a special session. • This special session of the UN General Assembly was to take stock of how well countries, international organizations and sectors of civil society responded to the challenge of the Earth Summit. • Through that Earth Summit, many important treaties and conventions were concluded such as: • 1. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development; • 2. Agenda 21; • 3. Convention on Biological Diversity; • 4. Forest Principles; • 5. Framework Convention on Climate Change; 4 • The following are the issues addressed by the Earth Summits: • 1. Issues relating to the production of toxic components, such as lead in gasoline, or poisonous waste including radioactive chemicals ; • 2.
    [Show full text]
  • From Stockholm to New York, Via Rio and Johannesburg: Has the Environment Lost Its Way on the Global Agenda?
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 29, Issue 5 2005 Article 3 From Stockholm to New York, via Rio and Johannesburg: Has the Environment Lost its Way on the Global Agenda? Paolo Galizzi∗ ∗ Copyright c 2005 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj From Stockholm to New York, via Rio and Johannesburg: Has the Environment Lost its Way on the Global Agenda? Paolo Galizzi Abstract This Article will examine the response of the international community to the compelling evi- dence on the environmental crisis facing our Planet. It will analyze the place of the environment in the international agenda from the early 1970s, when an international environmental agenda emerged, to the 2005 World Summit, where Heads of State and Government gathered to renew their commitment to the international agenda for the twenty-first century agreed at the Millennium Summit. More specifically, the Article will examine the “comprehensive” international environ- mental agenda that has emerged within the U.N. FROM STOCKHOLM TO NEW YORK, VIA RIO AND JOHANNESBURG: HAS THE ENVIRONMENT LOST ITS WAY ON THE GLOBAL AGENDA? Paolo Galizzi* In the streets of a crowded city, in the aisles of a giant super- market, or on the floor of a gleaming electronics factory, the biological state of Earth's rivers, forests, and mountains may seem a remote concern. Yet, despite the breakneck pace of technological change many of us have seen in our lifetimes, we each depend far more than we may realize on the web of life of which we are a part.
    [Show full text]
  • Food and Agriculture: the Future of Sustainability
    Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Development in the 21st century (SD21) The future of sustainability Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Development in the 21st century (SD21) The future of sustainability Study prepared by Daniele Giovannucci,1 Sara Scherr, Danielle Nierenberg, Charlotte Hebebrand, Julie Shapiro, Jeffrey Milder, and Keith Wheeler. A prime objective of the report is to stimulate – not to end – a healthy discussion that integrates and respects diverse “world views” on food and agriculture. Some sections may be challenging from one or another perspective and we hope that readers will appreciate the evidence and the value of consensus on several key areas. This study is part of the Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21) project. The project is implemented by the Division for Sustainable Development of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. This publication has been produced with the support of the European Union and the Committee on Sustainability Assessment (COSA). The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. Suggested citation: Daniele Giovannucci, Sara Scherr, Danielle Nierenberg, Charlotte Hebebrand, Julie Shapiro, Jeffrey Milder, and Keith Wheeler. 2012. Food and Agriculture: the future of sustainability. A strategic input to the Sustainable Development in the 21st Century (SD21) project. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development Executive Summary Our population trajectory means that from now to food systems. Rather than simply “more” production, 2030, the world will need to build the equivalent of we must also consider what would be “better” a city of one million people in developing countries, production and better food systems.
    [Show full text]
  • India Revision of Country Gender Profile Final Report
    India India Revision of Country Gender Profile Final Report March 09, 2015 Japan International Cooperation Agency PricewaterhouseCoopersPrivate Limited (PwC) ID JR 15 -001 India l India Revision of Country Gender Profile Final Report March 09, 2015 Japan International Cooperation Agency PricewaterhouseCoopersPrivate Limited (PwC) 1 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations .......................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 Sector Report Cards .......................................................................................................... 18 A. Education Sector .......................................................................................... 19 Sector Overview ................................................................................................................ 19 Institutional Structure ....................................................................................................... 22 Sector Policy Overview ..................................................................................................... 24 Analysis of Key Indicators ................................................................................................ 29 Donor Activity in the Sector .............................................................................................. 36 Way forward ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]