DOCSLIB.ORG

Food and Agriculture: the Future of Sustainability

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Food and Agriculture: the Future of Sustainability Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Development in the 21st century (SD21) The future of sustainability Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Development in the 21st century (SD21) The future of sustainability Study prepared by Daniele Giovannucci,1 Sara Scherr, Danielle Nierenberg, Charlotte Hebebrand, Julie Shapiro, Jeffrey Milder, and Keith Wheeler. A prime objective of the report is to stimulate – not to end – a healthy discussion that integrates and respects diverse “world views” on food and agriculture. Some sections may be challenging from one or another perspective and we hope that readers will appreciate the evidence and the value of consensus on several key areas. This study is part of the Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21) project. The project is implemented by the Division for Sustainable Development of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. This publication has been produced with the support of the European Union and the Committee on Sustainability Assessment (COSA). The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. Suggested citation: Daniele Giovannucci, Sara Scherr, Danielle Nierenberg, Charlotte Hebebrand, Julie Shapiro, Jeffrey Milder, and Keith Wheeler. 2012. Food and Agriculture: the future of sustainability. A strategic input to the Sustainable Development in the 21st Century (SD21) project. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development Executive Summary Our population trajectory means that from now to food systems. Rather than simply “more” production, 2030, the world will need to build the equivalent of we must also consider what would be “better” a city of one million people in developing countries, production and better food systems. every five days! There is widespread consensus that, going forward, farmers must produce more food per There are many who advocate a profound re-thinking unit of land, water, and agrochemicals. To do so, of our current models and, to better serve our coming however, they simply cannot continue producing in needs, would re-imagine and transform the world’s the same way. They will have to do this while facing major agriculture and food systems, not just tinker climate change, volatility, shifting nutrition needs, and at the margins or modify them incrementally. Recent the increasing scarcity of most of the physical factors decades have seen such re-imagining result in of production. Agriculture is at the threshold of a radical and world-changing innovations in every field necessary paradigm shift. from politics (social network media) to healthcare (nanotech-based diagnostics and drugs) and This paper illustrates how leading thinkers imagine communication (mobile telephony). our future food and agriculture world. It eschews positions and instead invites reasoned discussion. For the first time at a global level, food It cuts across the thought silos intrinsic to different production faces multiple limiting factors for world views and partisan values to identify consensus key resources such as land, water, energy and also disagreement. We solicited input from and inputs. We must use this challenge to stimulate creative innovation leading experts in different dimensions of agriculture, representing the perspectives of the natural and social sciences, developing and developed countries, policy and academia, public and private. Respondents were Main trends and challenges asked about most significant trends and the most important priorities in the next 20 years to ensure There are opportunities and also considerable sustainable food and agriculture systems. challenges and some are relatively new. For example: • We now face astonishing levels of waste, 30–40 Farming has enormous impacts on the world’s most percent of all food, and at every step of the food critical resources. Accordingly, farmers will have to cycle. Every year, high percentages of the food produce while also ensuring the provision of various produced in developing countries never makes it vital ecosystem services. If they do not, we will not to market and consumers in rich countries waste only degrade those resources but also exhaust the as much food as the entire net food production of ability to produce enough food. sub-Saharan Africa. • We are aiming at the wrong goal. For the first time These expectations pose quite a challenge and the in history we have as many overweight people as overall outcome depends very much on the response undernourished people and the consequences of of millions of mostly small and medium farmers. The our emerging dietary habits are on a disastrous current ‘more production’ orientation is so outdated trajectory for human health and for ecosystem and unresponsive to our current needs that it is causing health. Yet, agriculture policy concentrates mostly its own problems, particularly for our environment on production and trade and is curiously divorced and natural resources. Although food is critical, it is from the vital issues of good nutrition. We need to not just about food. We have a pressing need for new actively shift our focus to two areas: approaches in policies and structures that realistically a) more access since we already have more account for the formidable environmental impacts and than 4000 kcal per person per day in traded consider the social consequences of our evolving agri- foods; and iv Food and Agriculture: The future of sustainability Executive SummaryExecutive b) more nutrition or healthy food because productive lands are lost annually through soil the explosion of empty calories in many erosion and degradation, much of it in developing developing countries reflects the meteoric countries. Besides its production function, rise of the clinically overweight in many agriculture needs to integrate other vital functions industrial economies. of ecosystem management as central features of • Despite their increasing importance, the current its development. trends in livestock and biofuels are likely to contribute to more food-related crises due to their Where will solutions come from? As many inefficient use of food-related resources. governments have retreated from agricultural • Pressures on food prices are likely to continue investment there is a shifting re-organization of roles since they are exacerbated by volatile market and of governance from public to private. Clearly, dynamics, inadequate global coordination and private enterprise is a powerful factor, and even more the multiple effects of population growth, energy so with increased concentration all along the supply markets, climate change, land degradation and chain. Firms themselves also face new governance water scarcity. challenges with volatility in supplies and markets • Concentration in supply puts us at increasing and increasingly transparent operating and reporting risk. With more than 50,000 edible plants in the conditions. While many firms serve only their private world still, over well half of our food comes from interests, an increasing number of forward-looking only three. Concentration in the number of firms firms recognize the need to create shared value and managing the global distribution of food supplies not just profit if they are to thrive in the long term. How may also contribute to risks. can public governance work with companies to foster • Governance is shifting. The main actors are not both public and private benefits? How can we now heading in quite the same direction. Agriculture employ vastly improved methods for measuring and discussions are increasingly oriented toward understanding the impacts we are creating and use ecological approaches that recognize the limits these to evolve new learning pathways for producers, imposed by natural resources and toward improved communities, firms, and policymakers? The public social outcomes. However, many governments, sector must offer a more thoughtful and principled international agencies, multilateral and bilateral guidance that takes into account longer-term public institutions are only beginning to actively invest needs and the private sector will have to be a major in such concepts in agriculture; whereas a few part of the solutions to the new challenges of our food food companies and NGOs are taking the lead and agriculture systems since its future depends on instead. Corporate power has grown to easily rival the sustainability of these systems as well. the influence and effect of the state, changing the dynamics of local and global food systems. In light of the state of agriculture, there is agreement Consequently, we will not advance effectively in a number of important areas even across the unless we address how public policy and private distinctive world views embodied in the four diverse sector investment choices integrate toward a groups that undertook this process: Policy and Trade; common and shared good. Business Specialists; Rural Livelihoods and Poverty; • Agriculture is one of the biggest threats to a healthy and Environmental Sustainability. Being explicit about environment. It uses most of our available fresh both the differences and the areas of consensus water and some 20,000–50,000 km2 of potentially enables us to focus on realistic efforts right now. Food and Agriculture: The future of sustainability v Nine key areas of consensus have emerged as the key paths of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impacts of Future Agricultural Change on Ecosystem Service Indicators Sam S
    https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2019-44 Preprint. Discussion started: 15 August 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Impacts of future agricultural change on ecosystem service indicators Sam S. Rabin1, Peter Alexander2,3, Roslyn Henry2, Peter Anthoni1, Thomas A. M. Pugh4,5, Mark Rounsevell1, and Almut Arneth1 1Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research / Atmospheric Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany 2School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, UK 3Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, UK 4School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK 5Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, UK Correspondence: Sam S. Rabin ([email protected]) Abstract. A future of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, changing climate, growing human populations, and shifting socioeconomic conditions means that the global agricultural system will need to adapt in order to feed the world. These changes will affect not only agricultural land, but terrestrial ecosystems in general. Here, we use the coupled land use and vegetation model LandSyMM to quantify future land use change and resulting impacts on ecosystem service indicators 5 including carbon sequestration, runoff, and nitrogen pollution. We additionally hold certain variables, such as climate or land use, constant to assess the relative contribution of different drivers to the projected impacts. While indicators of some ecosystem services (e.g., flood and drought risk) see trends that are mostly dominated by the direct effects of climate change, others (e.g., carbon sequestration) depend critically on land use and management. Scenarios in which climate change mitigation is more difficult (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways 3 and 5) have the strongest impacts on ecosystem service indicators, such as a loss 10 of 13–19% of land in biodiversity hotspots and a 28% increase in nitrogen pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Assessment and Reporting for the University of Michigan's Ann Arbor Campus
    Report No. CSS02-04 April 2002 Sustainability Assessment and Reporting for the University of Michigan's Ann Arbor Campus Sandra I. Rodriguez, Matthew S. Roman, Samantha C. Sturhahn & Elizabeth H. Terry Sustainability Assessment and Reporting for the University of Michigan's Ann Arbor Campus By: Sandra I. Rodriguez Matthew S. Roman Samantha C. Sturhahn Elizabeth H. Terry A project submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Natural Resources and Environment) University of Michigan Ann Arbor April, 2002 Faculty Advisors: Professor Jonathan W. Bulkley Associate Research Scientist Gregory A. Keoleian A report of the Center for Sustainable Systems Report No. CSS02-04 Document Description SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN'S ANN ARBOR CAMPUS Sandra I. Rodriguez, Matthew S. Roman, Samantha C. Sturhahn & Elizabeth H. Terry Center for Sustainable Systems, Report No. CSS02-04 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan April, 2002 415 pp., tables, figures, 48 appendices This document is available online at: http://css.snre.umich.edu Center for Sustainable Systems School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Michigan 440 Church Street, Dana Building Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1041 Phone: 734-764-1412 Fax: 734-647-5841 Email: [email protected] Web: http://css.snre.umich.edu © Copyright 2002 by the Regents of the University of Michigan The University of Michigan Sustainability Assessment and Reporting Team would like to recognize the invaluable guidance of Dr. Jonathan W. Bulkley and Dr. Gregory A. Keoleian (Center for Sustainable Systems), without whose support this project would not have been possible. In addition, we would also like to thank our client, the University of Michigan Facilities and Operations, and specifically the project liaison, Occupational Safety and Environmental Health Department (OSEH), represented by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Ahead to 2050: Evolution of Agricultural Trade Policies
    Looking Ahead to 2050: Evolution of Agricultural Trade Policies Tim Josling* The past four decades have seen remarkable developments in agricultural trade and in the policies and institutions that provide the environment for that trade. Agricultural trade has moved from being dominated by the purchase of raw materials from land-rich countries and those blessed with tropical climates to a complex network of marketing chains supplying food and other farm products to all corners of the world. The multilateral trade rules have evolved from informal codes of conduct for manufactured goods that had little impact on agricultural trade to a treaty-based agreement that determines in what form and by how much governments can intervene in agricultural markets at home and at the border. The regional trade rules that have been adopted in an explosion of preferential agreements also increasingly apply to agricultural and food trade, leading to a partial polarization of trade around several major markets. The task of this paper is to discuss future trends in agricultural and food trade policies. How are the institutions, domestic, regional or multilateral, likely to evolve over the next forty years? Will the emphasis be on consolidation of progress already made? Will globalization reach its ultimate endpoint of a borderless market for agricultural and food products with consumer choice determining trade flows along with the cool logic of sourcing from low-cost suppliers? Or are we likely to see trade evolve in different directions? Will we see a resurgence
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development and the 2002 World Summit
    RESEARCH PAPER 02/55 Sustainable Development 10TH OCTOBER 2002 and the 2002 World Summit The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1992, commonly referred to as the Earth Summit, initiated several large commitments to the global environment. In August 2002, the World Summit on Sustainable Development (also referred to as Rio +10) was held in Johannesburg to review the progress made over the ten years since the Earth Summit. The summit was widely considered to have achieved little progress. This paper looks at the concept of sustainability and the action being taken by the UK to address some of the commitments made in 1992. Stephen McGinness SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT SECTION Patsy Richards ECONOMIC POLICY AND STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: 02/40 Cross border shopping and smuggling 21.06.02 02/41 Modernisation of the House of Commons: Sitting hours 27.06.02 02/42 Economic Indicators [includes article: Housing market overheating] 01.07.02 02/43 The Burden of Taxation 09.07.02 02/44 Inflation: the value of the pound 1750-2001 11.07.02 02/45 The Euro-Zone: The early years & UK convergence 16.07.02 02/46 Unemployment by Constituency, June 2002 17.07.02 02/47 The Mobile Telephones (Re-programming) Bill [HL Bill 177 of 2001-02] 18.07.02 02/48 Defence Statistics – July 2002 19.07.02 02/49 Unemployment by Constituency, July 2002 15.08.02 02/50 Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) 22.08.02 02/51 Unemployment by Constituency, August 2002 11.09.02 02/52 Detention of suspected
    [Show full text]
  • Peter D. Ward – Curriculum Vitae Born May 12, 1949, Seattle Washington, USA Married, Two Children
    1 Peter D. Ward – Curriculum Vitae Born May 12, 1949, Seattle Washington, USA Married, two children 1. Education B.S., 1971 Interdisciplinary Studies (Paleoecology), University of Washington, Seattle M.S., 1973 Geology, University of Washington, Seattle Ph.D., 1976 Geology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Employment 1976-1978 Assistant Professor, Department of Geology, Ohio State University 1978-1981 Assistant Professor, Department of Geology, University of California, Davis 1981-1983 Associate Professor with Tenure, Department of Geology and Division of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis 1982 Visiting Scientist, Laboratoire Arago (C.N.R.S.), Banyuls, France 1984 Professor, Department of Geology, University of California, Davis 1985 Associate Professor, University of Washington 1986 Professor, Department of Geological Sciences, and Adjunct Professor, Department of Zoology, University of Washington 1989- 1996 Curator of Invertebrate Paleontology, Thomas Burke Memorial Museum, University of Washington 1991. Visiting Scientist, South African Museum 1992-1996 Chairman and Head, Division of Geology and Paleontology, Thomas Burke Memorial Museum, University of Washington 2000. Visiting Scientist, South African Museum 2001 – present, Adjunct Professor, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington 2003- present, Professor, Dept. of Biology, and Professor, Department of Earth and Space Sciences, The University of Washington 2007- Adjunct Curator, Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from the Beijing Climate Centre Climate System Modelling Version 1.1 (BCC–CSM 1.1) for Future Model Building
    Article Impact of Past and Future Climate Change on the Potential Distribution of an Endangered Montane Shrub Lonicera oblata and Its Conservation Implications Yuan-Mi Wu , Xue-Li Shen, Ling Tong, Feng-Wei Lei, Xian-Yun Mu * and Zhi-Xiang Zhang Laboratory of Systematic Evolution and Biogeography of Woody Plants, School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; [email protected] (Y.-M.W.); [email protected] (X.-L.S.); [email protected] (L.T.); [email protected] (F.-W.L.); [email protected] (Z.-X.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Climate change is an important driver of biodiversity patterns and species distributions, understanding how organisms respond to climate change will shed light on the conservation of endangered species. In this study, we modeled the distributional dynamics of a critically endangered montane shrub Lonicera oblata in response to climate change under different periods by building a comprehensive habitat suitability model considering the effects of soil and vegetation conditions. Our results indicated that the current suitable habitats for L. oblata are located scarcely in North China. Historical modeling indicated that L. oblata achieved its maximum potential distribution in the last interglacial period which covered southwest China, while its distribution area decreased for almost 50% during the last glacial maximum. It further contracted during the middle Holocene to a distribution resembling the current pattern. Future modeling showed that the suitable habitats of L. oblata contracted dramatically, and populations were fragmentedly distributed in these areas. Citation: Wu, Y.-M.; Shen, X.-L.; As a whole, the distribution of L.
    [Show full text]
  • HIV/AIDS: Geeta Rao Gupta
    I SSUE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE & 8 E SECURITY PROJECT REPORT NVIRONMENTAL ISSUE NO. 8 • THE WOODROW WILSON CENTER • SUMMER 2002 COMMENTARIES C What is to be Done at Johannesburg? HANGE Issues for the World Summit on Sustainable Development AND ARTICLES S Population, Poverty, and Vulnerability: Mitigating the Effects ECURITY of Natural Disasters George Martine and Jose Miguel Guzman P Migration, Population Change, and the Rural Environment ROJECT Richard E. Bilsborrow The Future of Environmental Security R Security and Ecology in the Age of Globalization EPORT Simon Dalby In Defense of Environment and Security Research Richard A. Matthew S UMMER SPECIAL REPORT Fire and Water: Technologies, Institutions, and Social Issues 2002 in Arms Control and Transboundary Water-Resources Agreements Elizabeth L. Chalecki, Peter H. Gleick, Kelli L. Larson, Arian L. Pregenzer, and Aaron T. Wolf The University of Michigan Plus: Reviews of New Publications, Official Statements, Population Fellows Programs ECSP Meeting Summaries, Organizational Updates, This publication is made possible through support provided by the Office of Population, U.S. Agency for International Development, and and Bibliography the University of Michigan, under the terms of Grant No. HRN-A-00-00-00001. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development, the University of Michigan, or the Woodrow Wilson Center. 89958mvpR3_Cover.p65 1 8/16/02, 11:18 AM The Woodrow Wilson International Center for ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE AND SECURITY PROJECT REPORT Scholars, located in the Ronald Reagan Building in the heart of Washington D.C., was founded in 1968 by Congress as the nation’s memorial to President Woodrow Wilson.
    [Show full text]
  • Premises of Sustainable Development Concept Occurence
    Land Forces Academy Review Vol. XXIV, No 1(93), 2019 PREMISES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OCCURENCE Elisabeta-Emilia HALMAGHI “Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy, Sibiu, Romania [email protected] Mihai-Marcel NEAG “Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy, Sibiu, Romania [email protected] ABSTRACT It has long been considered that the environment can withstand all the pressure exerted by human activities on it: extensive agriculture, pesticide use, strong industrialization, noxious gas emissions into the atmosphere, toxic product discharge into lakes, rivers, seas and oceans, massive deforestation to obtain new areas for housing or agriculture. The result was environmental and soil degradation, increased water and/or air pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, the disappearance of plant and/or animal species, the depletion of some natural resources. These environmental changes have begun to be studied by specialists in the field, who have raised a flag to irreversible environmental changes. The concept of “sustainable development” arose at a time when environmental issues were at the heart of political debate: sustainable development is seen as a complex and difficult issue to solve because there is a diversity of interests of different states. International agreements and cooperation from the point of view of globalization and economic harmonization have also had as their object the issues of sustainable development, by launching the attempt to reconcile the economy with the environment. KEYWORDS: sustainable development, environmental protection, Brundtland Report 1. Introduction Initially, the idea of sustainable Since the 1960s, both scientists in the development has started from the premise field of earth sciences or economics, as well that companies can grow economically by as scientific or fiction authors have begun protecting the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Humanity
    THE EVOLUTION OF HUMANITY: PAST, PRESENT, AND POSSIBLE FUTURE A Review of Humanity’s Taxonomic Classification and Proposal to Classify Humanity as a Sixth Kingdom, Symbolia January 200l John Allen, FLS Global Ecotechnics Corporation 1 Bluebird Court Santa Fe, NM 87508 Email: [email protected] A shorter version of this paper was first published as a philosophic essay in The Duversity Newsletter No.4 (2000) edited and published by the British thinker, AGE Blake. I am taking the step of publishing this expanded paper electronically with fuller scientific details and complete bibliography for the use of any scientist or other thinker or artist or citizen who finds it interesting and will make the proper acknowledgments if they use any part of the paper. I have reviewed the thrust of this full paper with several outstanding scientific thinkers and have been stimulated by their critical feedback. I especially acknowledge stimulating conversations with John Marsden, Sir Ghillean Prance, Tyler Volk, Niles Eldredge, and Abigail Alling, who of course bear no responsibility for any mistakes or any conclusions contained in the paper. Abstract The taxonomy of humans in the teeming world of life forms, has from the beginning of the Theory of Evolution presented one of the most difficult of problems for science. Darwin and Wallace themselves split over this. Darwin opted for a species of primate and Wallace for a difference amounting to a species of a new kingdom. However, a proper taxonomy was probably impossible in their time because the sciences of palaeontology, neurology, ecology, ethnology and archaeology were not available; Darwin was restricted to a choice between dogmatic Biblical and mechanistic world-views.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnival of Evolution #58: Visions of the Evolutionary Future Bradly Alicea Michigan State University
    Carnival of Evolution #58: visions of the evolutionary future Bradly Alicea Michigan State University Originally published at: http://syntheticdaisies.blogspot.com on April 1, 2013 (http://syntheticdaisies.blogspot.com/2013/04/carnival-of-evolution-58-visions-of.html) Welcome to Carnival of Evolution! Now with albedo! Introduction What does the future look like? For some, the future is the place of constant progress and a place where dreams become reality. For others, the future is a scary, dystopian place. When actualized, however, future worlds fall somewhere in between these two visions. Can we make accurate projections about the future? As I pointed out in a Synthetic Daisies post from February [1], futurists and technologists have a pretty dismal track record at projecting future scenarios, and often get things notoriously wrong. UPPER LEFT: Ad from the 1982 opening of EPCOT Center, Florida. UPPER RIGHT: Dystopic future city from the movie "Idiocracy" (Inset is the cover of "Future Shock" by Alvin Toffler). BOTTOM LEFT: Bank of England Economic Forecast (circa 2011). BOTTOM RIGHT: New New York, circa 3000 (from the TV show "Futurama"). With visions of the future in mind, this month's Carnival of Evolution (#58) theme is the future of evolution. While a significant component of evolutionary biology involves reconstructing the past [2], we are actually (with error, of course) also predicting the future. Yet can we do any better than futurists or technologists? It is hard to say, and if you have opinions on this I would be glad to hear them. However, this month's CoE will address five themes that may (or may not) help us understand where the complexity of life is headed.
    [Show full text]
  • E and G PM File 2005 Final
    © UNEP, 2005 Published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). ISBN: 92-807-2487-6 Job No.: DEW/0573/NA February 2005 DISCLAIMER This publication may be reproduced in whole or part and in any form of educational or non- proper services without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. For further information, please contact: Steve Lonergan Director Division of Early Warning and Assessment United Nations Environment Programme P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya Phone:+ 254 20 62 4028 Fax: + 254 20 62 3943 Email: [email protected] Beth Ingraham Information Officer Project Coordinator Division of Early Warning and Assessment United Nations Environment Programme P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya Phone:+ 254 20 62 4299 Fax: + 254 20 62 4269 Email: [email protected] Design and Layout: Audrey Ringler, DEWA Printing: UNON, Nairobi This book is printed on 100 per cent recycled, chlorine free paper Mainstreaming Gender in Environmental Assessment And Early Warning JONI SEAGER, PhD. DEAN OF THE FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES YORK UNIVERSITY, TORONTO, CANADA [email protected] and BETSY HARTMANN, PhD. DIRECTOR OF THE POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE, MASSACHUSETTS, USA [email protected] WITH RESEARCH ASSISTANCE FROM ROBIN ROTH AND SOLANGE BANDIAKY, CLARK UNIVERSITY Mainstreaming Gender in Environmental Assessment and Early Warning Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report on the Delta Alliance Young Professionals Award Activity
    7 6 Delta Alliance Young Professionals Award Innovative solutions for delta challenges worldwide Final report June 2014 Final report 2014 Delta Alliance Wim van Driel, Alterra To be cited as: Driel, W.F. van, 2014. Delta Alliance Young Professionals Award; Innovative solutions for delta challenges worldwide. Final report. Delta Alliance report no. 6, Wageningen, The Netherlands www.delta-alliance.org Delta Alliance Young Professionals Award: http://www.delta-alliance.org/ypa Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................1 2. Delta Alliance Young Professional Award (YPA) ...................................................................1 3. Activities ..................................................................................................................................2 3.1 Activities in 2011 ...............................................................................................................2 3.2 Activities 2012 ...................................................................................................................2 3.3 Activities in 2013 ...............................................................................................................9 4. In conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 12 ANNEXES/REFERENCES .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]