DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainability Assessment and Reporting for the University of Michigan's Ann Arbor Campus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Report No. CSS02-04 April 2002 Sustainability Assessment and Reporting for the University of Michigan's Ann Arbor Campus Sandra I. Rodriguez, Matthew S. Roman, Samantha C. Sturhahn & Elizabeth H. Terry Sustainability Assessment and Reporting for the University of Michigan's Ann Arbor Campus By: Sandra I. Rodriguez Matthew S. Roman Samantha C. Sturhahn Elizabeth H. Terry A project submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Natural Resources and Environment) University of Michigan Ann Arbor April, 2002 Faculty Advisors: Professor Jonathan W. Bulkley Associate Research Scientist Gregory A. Keoleian A report of the Center for Sustainable Systems Report No. CSS02-04 Document Description SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN'S ANN ARBOR CAMPUS Sandra I. Rodriguez, Matthew S. Roman, Samantha C. Sturhahn & Elizabeth H. Terry Center for Sustainable Systems, Report No. CSS02-04 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan April, 2002 415 pp., tables, figures, 48 appendices This document is available online at: http://css.snre.umich.edu Center for Sustainable Systems School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Michigan 440 Church Street, Dana Building Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1041 Phone: 734-764-1412 Fax: 734-647-5841 Email: [email protected] Web: http://css.snre.umich.edu © Copyright 2002 by the Regents of the University of Michigan The University of Michigan Sustainability Assessment and Reporting Team would like to recognize the invaluable guidance of Dr. Jonathan W. Bulkley and Dr. Gregory A. Keoleian (Center for Sustainable Systems), without whose support this project would not have been possible. In addition, we would also like to thank our client, the University of Michigan Facilities and Operations, and specifically the project liaison, Occupational Safety and Environmental Health Department (OSEH), represented by Mr. Andrew Berki and Mr. Terry Alexander, for enabling us to access the vast resources of the University. Sandra Rodriguez Matt Roman Samantha Sturhahn Elizabeth Terry iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared in close collaboration with the following departments at the University of Michigan: University of Michigan Departments Consulted Bentley Historical Library M-Stores - Central Stores Central Power Plant M-Stores - Food Stores Department of Public Safety Nichols Arboretum Dining Services Office of Budget and Planning Division of Research Development and Administration Office of Gift Administration Edward Ginsberg Center for Community Service and Learning Office of Government Relations Facilities and Operations Office of the Registrar Financial Operations Plant Fund Plant Landscape Financial Reporting Office Printing Services Grounds and Waste Management Services Property Disposition Human Resources and Affirmative Action State Outreach Office Intercollegiate Athletics Transportation Services Investment Office UM Health Services Waste Management and Recycling LS&A Environmental Studies Program U-M Press Marketing Communications University Employee Relations and Compensation Matthei Botanical Gardens Utilities and Plant Operations The following members of our Steering Committee provided invaluable assistance in the form of several peer reviews during the course of this project: Sustainability Assessment and Report Master's Project Steering Committee Name Organization Name Organization Terry Alexander Facilities & Operations, Greg Keoleian Center for Sustainable University of Michigan Systems, University of Michigan Andy Berki Facili ties & Operations, Chris Kolb State Representative, 53rd University of Michigan District Laura Berry Emissions Lab, US Jaymie Meliker University of Michigan Environmental Protection Student (PhD) Agency Jonathan Bulkley Center for Sustainable Scott Noesen The Dow Chemical Company Systems, University of Michigan Rob Frederick Corporate Governance, Ford Barbara Stanton Former Detroit Free Press Motor Company Editorial Writer Robert Gray Associate Dean - School of Bill Verge Purchased Utilities, Public Health, University of University of Michigan Michigan Julian Keniry Campus Ecology Program, National Wildlife Federation Finally, the Center for Sustainable Systems, the Wege Foundation, and the Department of Occupational Safety and Environmental Health (OSEH) all provided guidance and financial support throughout this project. iv ABSTRACT This project assesses the sustainability of the University of Michigan’s Ann Arbor campus (U-M AA). Objectives are to propose a definition of sustainability and a framework for assessment tailored to the U-M AA, to use the framework to evaluate a set of sustainability indicators, to highlight findings in a Prototype Sustainability Report, and to provide recommendations for an institutionalized reporting process. The assessment framework utilizes the “triple bottom line” concept, which recognizes environmental, social and economic spheres of sustainability. Each sphere is divided into categories and further into indicators. Environmental categories ranged from water use to greenhouse gas emissions, social categories from wages to community development and financial categories from revenues to investment policies. A total of fifty indicators are presented, including twenty-five environmental, twenty social, and five economic. Certain indicators are normalized into metrics in order to account for the growth of the campus. Geographic boundaries delineate activities that occur within the U-M AA system, including education, research, medical care, housing, food service, recreation, arts and community development. Temporal boundaries define the time period for study as 1990 plus 1995 through 2001. Life cycle analysis is used for certain indicators to measure upstream and downstream impacts. Data gathering and analysis were conducted in close collaboration with over thirty U-M AA departments. Results show both positive and negative trends and provide a baseline for setting short- and long-term goals. This study recommends that the U-M AA institutionalize annual sustainability assessment and reporting to enhance its position as a leading educational institution. Challenges encountered during this study generated other recommendations, including commitment from University leadership to champion the process, wider involvement of internal and external stakeholders in framework and indicator refinement, and the creation of a centralized sustainability assessment entity. v TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction........................................................................ 1 1.1 What is Sustainability? ............................................................................................. 2 1.2 Why is Sustainability Important? ............................................................................. 3 1.3 Moving Toward Sustainability ................................................................................. 6 1.4 Project Objectives ................................................................................................... 12 1.5 History of Sustainability at the University of Michigan......................................... 13 1.5.1 Energy............................................................................................................. 15 1.5.2 Faculty and Education..................................................................................... 16 1.5.3 Joint degree programs..................................................................................... 16 1.5.4 Transportation................................................................................................. 17 1.5.5 Pollution Prevention/ Waste Minimization/ Recycling .................................. 17 1.5.6 De-icing/Anti-icing initiatives ........................................................................ 18 1.5.7 Center for Sustainable Systems (CSS)............................................................ 19 1.5.8 Students’ and other campus initiatives ........................................................... 19 1.5.9 Internationally relevant events........................................................................ 20 2 Methods ............................................................................ 21 2.1 Definition of System............................................................................................... 21 2.2 Profile of the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor .................................................. 22 2.2.1 Geographical Extent........................................................................................ 22 2.2.2 Campus Demographics ................................................................................... 23 2.2.3 Academic Units............................................................................................... 24 2.2.4 Research Activities ......................................................................................... 24 2.2.5 Housing........................................................................................................... 25 2.2.6 Athletics .......................................................................................................... 25 2.2.7 Hospital System .............................................................................................. 26 2.3 Framework .............................................................................................................. 26 2.4 Methodology..........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Development and the 2002 World Summit

    Sustainable Development and the 2002 World Summit

    RESEARCH PAPER 02/55 Sustainable Development 10TH OCTOBER 2002 and the 2002 World Summit The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1992, commonly referred to as the Earth Summit, initiated several large commitments to the global environment. In August 2002, the World Summit on Sustainable Development (also referred to as Rio +10) was held in Johannesburg to review the progress made over the ten years since the Earth Summit. The summit was widely considered to have achieved little progress. This paper looks at the concept of sustainability and the action being taken by the UK to address some of the commitments made in 1992. Stephen McGinness SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT SECTION Patsy Richards ECONOMIC POLICY AND STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: 02/40 Cross border shopping and smuggling 21.06.02 02/41 Modernisation of the House of Commons: Sitting hours 27.06.02 02/42 Economic Indicators [includes article: Housing market overheating] 01.07.02 02/43 The Burden of Taxation 09.07.02 02/44 Inflation: the value of the pound 1750-2001 11.07.02 02/45 The Euro-Zone: The early years & UK convergence 16.07.02 02/46 Unemployment by Constituency, June 2002 17.07.02 02/47 The Mobile Telephones (Re-programming) Bill [HL Bill 177 of 2001-02] 18.07.02 02/48 Defence Statistics – July 2002 19.07.02 02/49 Unemployment by Constituency, July 2002 15.08.02 02/50 Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) 22.08.02 02/51 Unemployment by Constituency, August 2002 11.09.02 02/52 Detention of suspected
  • Business As Unusual the Student Guide to Graduate Programs 2012

    Business As Unusual the Student Guide to Graduate Programs 2012

    BUSINESS AS UNUSUAL THE STUDENT GUIDE TO GRADUATE PROGRAMS 2012 PUBLISHED BY Business as UNusual: The Student Guide to Graduate Programs 2012 is a publication of Net Impact 150 Spear Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94105, USA www.netimpact.org/bizschoolguide © 2012 All rights reserved. BUSINESS AS UNUSUAL THE STUDENT GUIDE TO GRADUATE PROGRAMS 2012 Innovative approaches to tackling social challenges: How will you change the world in 2012? • Hult’s Master of Social Entrepreneurship is a highly practical program focused on how to apply business skills to important global social problems The Hult Global Case Challenge is a call to action for the world’s brightest university and • The Hult Global Case Challenge is a call to action for the world’s brightest business college student minds to tackle the world’s school minds to tackle the world’s most pressing issues most pressing issues with competitions in • Hult offers an intensive, one-year MBA program and Master programs in Boston, San Francisco, London, Dubai and International Business, Finance, Digital Marketing, and Social Entrepreneurship Shanghai, and on-line. A USD1 million prize is awarded to implement the winning solution. st th • Ranked 1 for International Experience and 5 for International Business by the The Hult Global Case Challenge is anything but Financial Times an academic exercise. If you think you have a • Ranked in the top 20 business schools in the U.S. and top 30 in the world by good idea and want to help change the world, The Economist we invite you to join our annual Challenge.
  • HIV/AIDS: Geeta Rao Gupta

    HIV/AIDS: Geeta Rao Gupta

    I SSUE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE & 8 E SECURITY PROJECT REPORT NVIRONMENTAL ISSUE NO. 8 • THE WOODROW WILSON CENTER • SUMMER 2002 COMMENTARIES C What is to be Done at Johannesburg? HANGE Issues for the World Summit on Sustainable Development AND ARTICLES S Population, Poverty, and Vulnerability: Mitigating the Effects ECURITY of Natural Disasters George Martine and Jose Miguel Guzman P Migration, Population Change, and the Rural Environment ROJECT Richard E. Bilsborrow The Future of Environmental Security R Security and Ecology in the Age of Globalization EPORT Simon Dalby In Defense of Environment and Security Research Richard A. Matthew S UMMER SPECIAL REPORT Fire and Water: Technologies, Institutions, and Social Issues 2002 in Arms Control and Transboundary Water-Resources Agreements Elizabeth L. Chalecki, Peter H. Gleick, Kelli L. Larson, Arian L. Pregenzer, and Aaron T. Wolf The University of Michigan Plus: Reviews of New Publications, Official Statements, Population Fellows Programs ECSP Meeting Summaries, Organizational Updates, This publication is made possible through support provided by the Office of Population, U.S. Agency for International Development, and and Bibliography the University of Michigan, under the terms of Grant No. HRN-A-00-00-00001. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development, the University of Michigan, or the Woodrow Wilson Center. 89958mvpR3_Cover.p65 1 8/16/02, 11:18 AM The Woodrow Wilson International Center for ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE AND SECURITY PROJECT REPORT Scholars, located in the Ronald Reagan Building in the heart of Washington D.C., was founded in 1968 by Congress as the nation’s memorial to President Woodrow Wilson.
  • Premises of Sustainable Development Concept Occurence

    Premises of Sustainable Development Concept Occurence

    Land Forces Academy Review Vol. XXIV, No 1(93), 2019 PREMISES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT OCCURENCE Elisabeta-Emilia HALMAGHI “Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy, Sibiu, Romania [email protected] Mihai-Marcel NEAG “Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy, Sibiu, Romania [email protected] ABSTRACT It has long been considered that the environment can withstand all the pressure exerted by human activities on it: extensive agriculture, pesticide use, strong industrialization, noxious gas emissions into the atmosphere, toxic product discharge into lakes, rivers, seas and oceans, massive deforestation to obtain new areas for housing or agriculture. The result was environmental and soil degradation, increased water and/or air pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, the disappearance of plant and/or animal species, the depletion of some natural resources. These environmental changes have begun to be studied by specialists in the field, who have raised a flag to irreversible environmental changes. The concept of “sustainable development” arose at a time when environmental issues were at the heart of political debate: sustainable development is seen as a complex and difficult issue to solve because there is a diversity of interests of different states. International agreements and cooperation from the point of view of globalization and economic harmonization have also had as their object the issues of sustainable development, by launching the attempt to reconcile the economy with the environment. KEYWORDS: sustainable development, environmental protection, Brundtland Report 1. Introduction Initially, the idea of sustainable Since the 1960s, both scientists in the development has started from the premise field of earth sciences or economics, as well that companies can grow economically by as scientific or fiction authors have begun protecting the environment.
  • E and G PM File 2005 Final

    E and G PM File 2005 Final

    © UNEP, 2005 Published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). ISBN: 92-807-2487-6 Job No.: DEW/0573/NA February 2005 DISCLAIMER This publication may be reproduced in whole or part and in any form of educational or non- proper services without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. For further information, please contact: Steve Lonergan Director Division of Early Warning and Assessment United Nations Environment Programme P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya Phone:+ 254 20 62 4028 Fax: + 254 20 62 3943 Email: [email protected] Beth Ingraham Information Officer Project Coordinator Division of Early Warning and Assessment United Nations Environment Programme P. O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya Phone:+ 254 20 62 4299 Fax: + 254 20 62 4269 Email: [email protected] Design and Layout: Audrey Ringler, DEWA Printing: UNON, Nairobi This book is printed on 100 per cent recycled, chlorine free paper Mainstreaming Gender in Environmental Assessment And Early Warning JONI SEAGER, PhD. DEAN OF THE FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES YORK UNIVERSITY, TORONTO, CANADA [email protected] and BETSY HARTMANN, PhD. DIRECTOR OF THE POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE, MASSACHUSETTS, USA [email protected] WITH RESEARCH ASSISTANCE FROM ROBIN ROTH AND SOLANGE BANDIAKY, CLARK UNIVERSITY Mainstreaming Gender in Environmental Assessment and Early Warning Table of Contents
  • Final Report on the Delta Alliance Young Professionals Award Activity

    Final Report on the Delta Alliance Young Professionals Award Activity

    7 6 Delta Alliance Young Professionals Award Innovative solutions for delta challenges worldwide Final report June 2014 Final report 2014 Delta Alliance Wim van Driel, Alterra To be cited as: Driel, W.F. van, 2014. Delta Alliance Young Professionals Award; Innovative solutions for delta challenges worldwide. Final report. Delta Alliance report no. 6, Wageningen, The Netherlands www.delta-alliance.org Delta Alliance Young Professionals Award: http://www.delta-alliance.org/ypa Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................1 2. Delta Alliance Young Professional Award (YPA) ...................................................................1 3. Activities ..................................................................................................................................2 3.1 Activities in 2011 ...............................................................................................................2 3.2 Activities 2012 ...................................................................................................................2 3.3 Activities in 2013 ...............................................................................................................9 4. In conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 12 ANNEXES/REFERENCES .....................................................................................................
  • Sustainability Report 2014-2015 “Business for a Better World”

    Sustainability Report 2014-2015 “Business for a Better World”

    Sustainability Report 2014-2015 “Business for a Better World” INSEAD Europe Campus Boulevard de Constance 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex, France Tel: +33 (0)1 60 72 40 00 Fax: +33 (0)1 60 74 55 00 INSEAD Asia Campus 1 Ayer Rajah Avenue Singapore 138676 Tel: +65 6799 5388 Fax: +65 6799 5399 INSEAD Middle East Campus paper on 100% recycled 4th Street - Muroor Road P.O. Box 48049 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Tel: +971 2 651 5200 Fax: +971 2 443 9461 www.insead.edu INSEAD 11/16 Printed by Contents Imprint Content & Project Management This report has been compiled and written by Miranda HELMES, Project Manager, INSEAD Social Innovation Centre, under supervision of Dr. Michael HENSEN, Director, INSEAD Social Innovation Centre. Contact From the Dean 1 INSEAD Social Innovation Centre Europe Campus, Boulevard de Constance 77305 Fontainebleau - France Introduction 3 www.insead.edu G4-31 Steering Committee Research 5 1) Ammar ALSHEMERY, Associate Director Operations & Campus Services Abu Dhabi; 2) Virginie BODESCOT, Global Director Human Resources; 3) Attila CSELOTEI, Chief Information Officer; 4) Erika GUDJONSON, Associate Director Legal Affairs; 5) Christine HIRZEL, Global Head External Relations; 6) James MIDDLEDITCH, Education 11 Director Operations & Campus Services Singapore; 7) Ilian MIHOV, Dean, The Novartis Chair of Management and Environment; 8) Urs PEYER, Dean of Degree Programmes; 9) Michael PICH, Dean of Executive Education; 10) Olivier POLLARD, Director Operations & Campus Services Fontainebleau; 11) Eric PONSONNET, General Society and Outreach 17 Director of Administration; 12) Yves PRENEAU, Staff Representative; 13) Phanish PURANAM, Academic Director of the PhD Programme, The Roland Berger Chaired Professor of Strategy and Organisation Design; 14) Mark ROBERTS, Associate Dean of Executive Education, 15) Joanne SHOVELLER, Associate Dean Advancement People (Students, Faculty and Staff) 26 & Alumni Relations; 16) N.
  • Global Ecological Diplomacy

    Global Ecological Diplomacy

    Global Ecological Diplomacy 1 Earth Summits • The Earth Summit refers to the United Nations (UN) conferences organised to address issues concerning environmental protection and socio-economic development. • The Earth Summit is also a platform in which the world examines and evaluates the relationship between human rights, population, social development, women and human settlements. 2 • In 1992, more than 100 heads of state met in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for the first international Earth Summit convened to address urgent problems of environmental protection and socio-economic development. • The assembled leaders signed the Convention on Climate Change and the Convention on Biological Diversity, endorsed the Rio Declaration and the Forest Principles, and adopted Agenda 21, a 300 page plan for achieving sustainable development in the 21st century. • The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created to monitor and report on implementation of the Earth Summit agreements. 3 • It was agreed that a five year review of Earth Summit progress would be made in 1997 by the United Nations General Assembly meeting in a special session. • This special session of the UN General Assembly was to take stock of how well countries, international organizations and sectors of civil society responded to the challenge of the Earth Summit. • Through that Earth Summit, many important treaties and conventions were concluded such as: • 1. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development; • 2. Agenda 21; • 3. Convention on Biological Diversity; • 4. Forest Principles; • 5. Framework Convention on Climate Change; 4 • The following are the issues addressed by the Earth Summits: • 1. Issues relating to the production of toxic components, such as lead in gasoline, or poisonous waste including radioactive chemicals ; • 2.
  • From Stockholm to New York, Via Rio and Johannesburg: Has the Environment Lost Its Way on the Global Agenda?

    From Stockholm to New York, Via Rio and Johannesburg: Has the Environment Lost Its Way on the Global Agenda?

    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 29, Issue 5 2005 Article 3 From Stockholm to New York, via Rio and Johannesburg: Has the Environment Lost its Way on the Global Agenda? Paolo Galizzi∗ ∗ Copyright c 2005 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj From Stockholm to New York, via Rio and Johannesburg: Has the Environment Lost its Way on the Global Agenda? Paolo Galizzi Abstract This Article will examine the response of the international community to the compelling evi- dence on the environmental crisis facing our Planet. It will analyze the place of the environment in the international agenda from the early 1970s, when an international environmental agenda emerged, to the 2005 World Summit, where Heads of State and Government gathered to renew their commitment to the international agenda for the twenty-first century agreed at the Millennium Summit. More specifically, the Article will examine the “comprehensive” international environ- mental agenda that has emerged within the U.N. FROM STOCKHOLM TO NEW YORK, VIA RIO AND JOHANNESBURG: HAS THE ENVIRONMENT LOST ITS WAY ON THE GLOBAL AGENDA? Paolo Galizzi* In the streets of a crowded city, in the aisles of a giant super- market, or on the floor of a gleaming electronics factory, the biological state of Earth's rivers, forests, and mountains may seem a remote concern. Yet, despite the breakneck pace of technological change many of us have seen in our lifetimes, we each depend far more than we may realize on the web of life of which we are a part.
  • Community Engagement and Social Change Minor Capstone Papers

    Community Engagement and Social Change Minor Capstone Papers

    UCLA Community Engagement and Social Change Minor Capstone Papers Title Social Impact Through Business: A Comparative Analysis of Undergraduate Course Offerings and Perceptions of University Support Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4g7574m3 Author Nordstrom, Anna Publication Date 2019-08-09 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Nordstrom 1 Social Impact Through Business: A Comparative Analysis of Undergraduate Course Offerings and Perceptions of University Support By: Anna Nordstrom Faculty Advisor: Jennifer Walske Civic Engagement Capstone Project Nordstrom 2 Social Impact Through Business: A Comparative Analysis of Undergraduate Course Offerings and Perceptions of University Support Introduction Social impact education is a new and growing field. From mandatory ethics courses to entire concentrations in social entrepreneurship, the diversity and range of offerings in this field are vast. Based on my research of four university social impact programs at the undergraduate level, within business fields, there are an interesting smorgasburg of course offerings. However, as this paper suggests, learning more about the implications and current offerings of social impact programs can help universities understand the needs of undergraduate students, to better serve this population of students. It can also further progressive social movements through students that choose to pursue social impact after graduation. Positionality This topic is interesting to me because I am currently teaching a course in social impact through business at the undergraduate level. I have found that there are not many courses on this topic at UCLA. This lack of offerings motivated my research to further understand how other universities approach this educational area and work with their students to further their learning.
  • Food and Agriculture: the Future of Sustainability

    Food and Agriculture: the Future of Sustainability

    Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Development in the 21st century (SD21) The future of sustainability Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Development in the 21st century (SD21) The future of sustainability Study prepared by Daniele Giovannucci,1 Sara Scherr, Danielle Nierenberg, Charlotte Hebebrand, Julie Shapiro, Jeffrey Milder, and Keith Wheeler. A prime objective of the report is to stimulate – not to end – a healthy discussion that integrates and respects diverse “world views” on food and agriculture. Some sections may be challenging from one or another perspective and we hope that readers will appreciate the evidence and the value of consensus on several key areas. This study is part of the Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21) project. The project is implemented by the Division for Sustainable Development of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. This publication has been produced with the support of the European Union and the Committee on Sustainability Assessment (COSA). The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. Suggested citation: Daniele Giovannucci, Sara Scherr, Danielle Nierenberg, Charlotte Hebebrand, Julie Shapiro, Jeffrey Milder, and Keith Wheeler. 2012. Food and Agriculture: the future of sustainability. A strategic input to the Sustainable Development in the 21st Century (SD21) project. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development Executive Summary Our population trajectory means that from now to food systems. Rather than simply “more” production, 2030, the world will need to build the equivalent of we must also consider what would be “better” a city of one million people in developing countries, production and better food systems.
  • India Revision of Country Gender Profile Final Report

    India Revision of Country Gender Profile Final Report

    India India Revision of Country Gender Profile Final Report March 09, 2015 Japan International Cooperation Agency PricewaterhouseCoopersPrivate Limited (PwC) ID JR 15 -001 India l India Revision of Country Gender Profile Final Report March 09, 2015 Japan International Cooperation Agency PricewaterhouseCoopersPrivate Limited (PwC) 1 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations .......................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 Sector Report Cards .......................................................................................................... 18 A. Education Sector .......................................................................................... 19 Sector Overview ................................................................................................................ 19 Institutional Structure ....................................................................................................... 22 Sector Policy Overview ..................................................................................................... 24 Analysis of Key Indicators ................................................................................................ 29 Donor Activity in the Sector .............................................................................................. 36 Way forward ....................................................................................................................