Gudgeon- Two New Additions to Britain's Freshwater Fishes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gudgeon- Two New Additions to Britain's Freshwater Fishes Sunbleak and Topmouth Gudgeon- two new additions to Britain's freshwater fishes ~ ~ Topmouth Gudgeon Sunbleak Adrian C Pinder and Rodolphe E Gozlan hroughout the world, it is commonly Globally, among vertebrates, introductions of accepted that the introduction of new freshwater fish species have been among the most T species to a stable ecosystem can upset the numerous (Crivelli 1995), and the introduction of environment and the species already present. non~native fishes to the UK is not a new phenome- Aquatic ecosystems are no exception and, with a non. The Carp Cyprinus carpio was first intro- dramatic increase in world travel and trading over duced for aquaculture in the 15th century (Balon the last century, are increasingly at risk from 1995), and during more recent times introductions biological invasion. that have successfully colonised UK watercourses The various threats posed by the introduction of include the Ide Leuciscus idus, Bitterling Rhodeus alien species are many and can manifest them- sericieus, Zander Sander lucioperca and Pumpkin- selves in the form of direct predation on native seed Lepomis gibbosus. The motives responsible species, competition for food, introduction of new for these introductions vary from ornamental fish- diseases or parasites, or potential to cause change keeping and angling interest to, in the case of to the environment. Grass Carp Ctenopharyngodon idella, their use as December 2003 British Wildlife 77 Sunbleak and Topmouth Gudgeon a biological herbicide to control the excessIve Whereas most British freshwater fish grow rela- growth of aquatic weed. tively rapidly for the first few years, until they become sexually mature, in Sunbleak growth is Sunbleakand Topmouth Gudgeon most rapid during the first summer, beyond which This article highlights two of the most recent intro- energy reserves are reallocated from somatic ductions to the fish fauna of Great Britain: growth towards gonad production, resulting in Topmouth Gudgeon Pseudorasbora parva and Sunbleak becoming sexually mature at one year Sunbleak Leucaspius delineatus. Over the last three old (Gozlan et al. 2003a). years, various aspects of the biology and ecology, During spawning, males, which are smaller than including the reproductive behaviour, habitat females, take up territories around the stems and requirements and early development, and the distri- underside of the leaves of water-lilies and other bution of these two species have been studied by the flat-surfaced structures. The males then clean any authors at the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology in accumulated bio-films from the spawning Dorset. Here, we summarise their fascinating life substrate, using their mouths. The ripe females, histories and assess the current status of these new which develop swollen, distended ovipositors additions to the British aquatic fauna. We also during spawning, join the male and travel at high discuss the future of these species in Britain and the speed across the spawning substrate (Gozlan et al. risks that they pose to our native fishes. 2003b), depositing strips of up to 80 highly adhe- sive eggs. A female Sunbleak can typically deposit a Basicbiology strip of 40 eggs in less than one second. After the Both Sunbleak and Topmouth Gudgeon are small female has spawned, the male guards the eggs and cyprinids possessing highly developed life-history encourages other females to deposit their eggs at strategies which have undoubtedly assisted them the same nest site. The male then guards the eggs in successfully colonising bodies of water in the until they hatch, which takes approximately four British Isles. The majority of cyprinid species take days at noc (Pinder & Gozlan in press). 2-4 years to become sexually mature and spawn In contrast to its alien and invasive status in the just once a year. The females scatter many thou- UK, the Sunbleak is considered rare or vulnerable sands of eggs over aquatic macrophytes or gravel, throughout much of its native range (Lelek 1987). and these are then left unguarded and vulnerable It is also listed as protected under Appendix III of to predation. Unusually for cyprinids, both the Bern Convention. Sunbleak and Topmouth Gudgeon become sexu- ally mature at one year old and are batch spawn- TopmouthGudgeon ers, with females laying several batches of eggs, Rarely attaining 8cm in length or living for more between April and July, which are guarded by the than three years, Topmouth Gudgeon predomi- males until they hatch. nantly occupy the bentho-pelagic zone, where This combination of attributes means that a their diet consists of algae, benthic invertebrates, relatively low number of eggs (when compared zooplankton, molluscs and also the eggs and with other cyprinid species) are produced, but larvae of other fish species (Xie et al. 2000). As with the parental care ensuring higher than aver- opportunistic feeders, Topmouth Gudgeon will age hatching rates. Also, as the brood is spread also take food from the )'Vater's surface, where across an extended period, larvae are less vulnera- feeding on terrestrial insects and other floating ble to changes in environmental conditions, thus objects is accompanied by an audible clicking enhancing survival rates (Gozlan et al. 2003a). noise. This behaviour is responsible for these fish being referred to by some as 'clicker barbs'. Sunbleak Topmouth Gudgeon have many life-history char- Sunbleak closely resemble Bleak Alburnus alburnus acteristics in common with Sunbleak. However, in appearance, but are a smaller species not exceed- subtle differences are evident. In contrast to ing 8cm in length and rarely living for more than Sunbleak, male Topmouth Gudgeon are larger than three to four years. They are gregarious and live in the females and exhibit secondary sexual character- large shoals close to the water's surface, where they istics such as tubercles around the mouth, and the typically feed on zooplankton and terrestrial insects. body coloration becomes much darker, particularly 78 British Wildlife December 2003 Sunbleak and Topmouth Gudgeon on the fins. At this time, territo- ries are established which are defended aggressively by the males. Spawning substrata have previously been reported to include the underside of rocks and broadleaved floating macro- phytes. Our studies have shown that, like Sunbleak, Topmouth Gudgeon can successfully spawn on any flat-surfaced object, although they show a preference for structures with a cavity, which are easier to guard from other fish, including their own speCIes. Preliminary investigations into the spawning behaviour, carried out by the Identification authors, suggest that bigger males are most successful in defending territories from Sunbleak conspecifics and in attracting gravid females. This Olive-green back, silver sides and abdomen with iridescent blue sheen along flanks is in agreement with the findings of Katano & Anal fin rays111/10-13 Maekawa (1997), who stated that females choose Distinctly short lateral line terminating before dorsal fin males with larger body size as their mates. Females Upturned mouth will spawn with several different males in a day, Topmouth Gudgeon depositing several batches of eggs in each terri- 34-38 lateral scales with dark edges tory. Dark band of lateral pigment (often absent in larger The eggs of Topmouth Gudgeon superficially (>Scm) individuals) resemble those of the Sunbleak, but have a thicker Dorsal and anal fins strongly convex Upturned mouth chorion and are encased in a jelly-like substance which is highly adhesive. Eggs are released in In the winter the shoals disperse to deeper water. smaller batches than those of Sunbleak, usually Sunbleak prefer slow-flowing rivers and associ- four to ten at a time. The male guards the eggs ated backwaters, drains, canals and stillwaters, until they hatch. The incubation period of the eggs although fast-flowing rivers have previously been is approximately seven days at 20Ce. Katano & identified as conduits for dispersal. Maekawa (1997) recorded mean fecundity as 1,049 eggs per female, with a maximum of 6,285. Topmouth Gudgeon Internationally, Topmouth Gudgeon are During early development, Topmouth Gudgeon regarded as a highly invasive pest species. disperse from the nest site to the benthos, where they hide between and under stones. It is not until Habitat all the fins are completely formed that they can be Sunbleak found in the open water of shallow marginal habi- During the first few weeks of development, tats. Topmouth Gudgeon are not a closely shoal- Sunbleak are found in shallow marginal habitats ing species and spread themselves across a broad where water temperatures are generally higher, range of the habitat types available to them. They supporting blooms of zooplankton and facilitat- are less specific than Sunbleak in terms of habitat ing optimum growth conditions. As the larvae choice and can thrive in streams, rivers and still- become more developed (around 40 days), these waters, although they are reported to favour shal- marginal habitats are abandoned in favour of deep low, still or slow-running waterbodies, water away from the banks. Here, they form preferentially with macrophyte beds (Adamek et shoals, swimming just below the water's surface. al. 1996). December 2003 British Wildlife 79 Sunbleak and Topmouth Gudgeon Distributionand currentstatus in the UK d --~ £LV,",". ~'\. N Figure 1 Present f!;. \J /" The original importation of both species is I~-, ' ) +I distributionSunbleak (black)of I /j~ \ believed to have occurred during the mid-1980s ,~ , h~ 'I. "-. and Topmouth through an ornamental-fish supplier near ;V j) \c;. \ Gudgeon (grey) Romsey, in Hampshire. Figure 1 shows an up-to- } ~ ~ in the UK.The date distribution map for both species and the ~. \ arrow shows only known site of introduction to the DK. ~ . Zr-~ the location of ..\><,..>) J i the original Sunbleak :( I ; importation of ~~I~L ~- both species, Originating from continental Europe and Russia, [F~-.""'" ... -/ ~'J although Sunbleak are well distributed from the Caspian j/ ]~._~ Sunbleak are no Sea to the North Sea and from the Volga to the c<,""~ atlongerthis site.present Alps and Pyrenees.
Recommended publications
  • Ipterists Digest
    ipterists Digest Dipterists’ Digest is a popular journal aimed primarily at field dipterists in the UK, Ireland and adjacent countries, with interests in recording, ecology, natural history, conservation and identification of British and NW European flies. Articles may be of any length up to 3000 words. Items exceeding this length may be serialised or printed in full, depending on the competition for space. They should be in clear concise English, preferably typed double spaced on one side of A4 paper. Only scientific names should be underlined- Tables should be on separate sheets. Figures drawn in clear black ink. about twice their printed size and lettered clearly. Enquiries about photographs and colour plates — please contact the Production Editor in advance as a charge may be made. References should follow the layout in this issue. Initially the scope of Dipterists' Digest will be:- — Observations of interesting behaviour, ecology, and natural history. — New and improved techniques (e.g. collecting, rearing etc.), — The conservation of flies and their habitats. — Provisional and interim reports from the Diptera Recording Schemes, including provisional and preliminary maps. — Records of new or scarce species for regions, counties, districts etc. — Local faunal accounts, field meeting results, and ‘holiday lists' with good ecological information/interpretation. — Notes on identification, additions, deletions and amendments to standard key works and checklists. — News of new publications/references/iiterature scan. Texts concerned with the Diptera of parts of continental Europe adjacent to the British Isles will also be considered for publication, if submitted in English. Dipterists Digest No.1 1988 E d ite d b y : Derek Whiteley Published by: Derek Whiteley - Sheffield - England for the Diptera Recording Scheme assisted by the Irish Wildlife Service ISSN 0953-7260 Printed by Higham Press Ltd., New Street, Shirland, Derby DE5 6BP s (0773) 832390.
    [Show full text]
  • “Brilliant Britain” on Stamps
    Stamp Fun “Brilliant Britain” on Stamps £3.00 Stamp Active Network In association with The Great Britain Philatelic Society Welcome to Stamp Active Stamp Active is a voluntary organisation which promotes stamp collecting for young people in the UK. This pack provides some activities for you to complete. If you finish five of the activities in the pack, please take it to one of the organisers at a Stamp Active event and you will receive a prize. There is plenty more for you to do in the pack or you can have a go at some of the other stamp competitions promoted by Stamp Active. The pack is yours to keep and it will give you a useful guide to some of the varied aspects of stamp collecting. Have Fun! Kids Corner, sponsored by The Philatelic Traders Society, Stamp Active Network is supported by major sponsors which takes place at Spring and Autumn Stampex, held including The Philatelic Fund, Stanley Gibbons, at the Business Design Centre, Islington, London. The Association of British Philatelic Societies, The Philatelic Traders Society, and The Great Britain Philatelic Society The Stamp Active Competition, sponsored by the as well as many other dealers, individuals and clubs and GBPS and The British Youth Stamp Championships, societies. Special thanks to Ian Varey for his development sponsored by Stanley Gibbons, for those interested in of the ideas for this activity pack. displaying their collections. We are always in need of financial donations or the gift Stamp Active Web Site to find out more about collecting of stamps, covers and other material.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Assessment for Reinforcing Pine Marten Numbers in England and Wales
    Feasibility Assessment for Reinforcing Pine Marten Numbers in England and Wales Jenny MacPherson The Vincent Wildlife Trust 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire, HR8 1EP November 2014 Co-authors and contributors ELIZABETH CROOSE The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP DAVID BAVIN The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP DECLAN O’MAHONY Agri-Food and Bioscience Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland JONATHAN P. SOMPER Greenaway, 44 Estcourt Road, Gloucester, GL1 3LG NATALIE BUTTRISS The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP Acknowledgements We would like to thank Johnny Birks, Robbie McDonald, Steven Tapper, Sean Christian and David Bullock for their input and helpful comments and discussion during the preparation of this report. We are also grateful to Paul Bright, Liz Halliwell, Huw Denman, Kenny Kortland, Colin Seddon, Roisin Campbell-Palmer, Peter Lack, Roger Powell, Pete Turner, Catherine O’Reilly, members and staff of the Dutch Mammal Society, Henry Schofield, Hilary Macmillan, Kate McAney, Orly Razgour and Matthieu Lundy for their help and advice. The questionnaire survey in chapter 5 was carried out as part of the People & Pine Martens in Wales project, funded by the Welsh Co-operative to whom we owe thanks. We are grateful to all organisations and individuals who publicised the online survey, including the People’s Trust for Endangered Species, the Federation of City Farms and Community Gardens, The Mammal Society, Denmark Farm, Gwent Wildlife Trust and Brecknock Wildlife Trust, and to all those who took time to complete the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution and Status of the Polecat (Mustela Putorius) in Britain 2014-2015
    The Distribution and Status of the Polecat (Mustela putorius) in Britain 2014-2015 Elizabeth Croose 2016 1 Contents 1 Acknowledgements 3.4.2.4 South-east England 16 3.4.2.5 East of England 17 2 Summary 3.4.2.6 Northern England 17 3.4.3 Scotland 18 3 19 1. Introduction 3.5 Defining ‘Polecat Purity Zones’ 3.5.1 Changes in ‘Polecat Purity Zones’ since the 2004-2006 survey 20 1.1 Introduction to the polecat 3 3.6 Carcass collection 21 1.2 History in Britain 3 1.3 Previous distribution surveys 4 4 22 1.4 Survey aims 4. Discussion 22 5 4.1 Distributional change since the 2004-2006 survey 2. Methods 4.2 Reasons for polecat range expansion 23 2.1 Record collection 5 4.3 Prospects and threats to future recovery 24 2.2 Publicity 5 4.3.1 Prospects for future recovery 24 2.3 Record verification 6 4.3.2 Potential threats to future recovery 24 2.4 Carcass collection 6 4.3.2.1 Trapping mortality 24 4.3.2.2 Secondary rodenticide poisoning 25 7 4.3.2.3 Status of the rabbit population 25 3. Results 4.3.2.4 Hybridisation between polecats and ferrets 25 3.1 Record collection 7 4.4 The status of the polecat elsewhere in Europe 27 3.2 Origins of records 7 4.5 Recommendations for future work 27 3.2.1 Road casualties 8 4.5.1 Monitoring polecats 27 3.2.2 Live sightings 9 4.5.2 Investigating threats to polecats 27 3.2.3 Live trapped 9 4.5.3 Raising awareness and promoting understanding 27 3.2.4 Dead (other) 11 4.5.4 Improving confidence in polecat records 28 3.2.5 Camera trap 11 3.3 Seasonal patterns 12 3.4 Distribution of records 13 28 5.
    [Show full text]
  • (2004) Pine Marten in Nidderdale. Yorks. Nat. Un. Bull. 42: 13
    Changes in the status and distribution of mammals of the order Carnivora in Yorkshire from 1600. County history of the fox, badger, otter, pine marten, stoat, weasel, polecat, American mink, wildcat and domestic cat. Item Type Thesis Authors Howes, Colin Anthony Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 24/09/2021 19:26:55 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/4306 BIBLIOGRAPHY Adams, R. (2004) Pine marten in Nidderdale. Yorks. Nat. Un. Bull. 42: 13. Alcock, I, and Warsop, P. (1982) Diet, distribution and habitat preference of stoats and weasels in Sheffield. Sorby Record 20: 5-10. Anderson-Bledsoe, K.L. and Scanlon, P.E. (1983) Heavy metal concentrations in tissues of Virginia river otters. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 30: 442-447. Andrews, R. (1879) The badger near Pickering. Naturalist 5: 153. Anon. (1880a) Land & Water. Anon. (1880b) Yorkshire Post. Anon. (1881a) The Field, 1.10.1881: 504. Anon. (1881b) Yorkshire Post, 21.6.1881. Anon. (1882a) YNU Circular for Excursion to Grassington 7.8.1882. Anon. (1882b) Yorkshire Post, 23rd May 1882. Anon. (1883) Leeds Express, 24 August 1883. Anon. (1886) Mammals. In YNU Circular 3 for Excursion to Pateley Bridge 17.7.1886. Anon. (1887) The Field, 28 5.1887.
    [Show full text]
  • Syrphidae (Díptera) of Central France
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Volucella - Die Schwebfliegen-Zeitschrift Jahr/Year: 1996 Band/Volume: 2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Speight Martin C. D. Artikel/Article: Syrphidae (Diptera) of Central France 20-35 ©Volucella; Dieter Doczkal (München) und Ulrich Schmid (Stuttgart), download www.zobodat.at 20 VoLUCELLA 2 (1/2), 1996 Syrphidae (Díptera) of Central France Martin C.D. Speight Speight, M.C.D. (1996): Syrphidae (Diptera) of Central France. - Volucella 2 (1/2), 20-35. Stuttgart. Records are presented for 223 species of Syrphidae, derived from the region of France comprising the Départements of Allier, Cher, Cote d ’Or, Indre, Indre-et- Loire, Loir-et-Cher, Loiret, Nièvre, Saône-et-Loire and Yonne. Location of reference specimens is indicated. The ecological balance of this regional fauna is explored, by comparison between the habitat preferences of the species on this list and syrphid lists for North France, Great Britain, Ireland and the Atlantic zone of Europe in general. This shows that, at any location in the Atlantic zone, conversion of deciduous forest to conifer forest can be expected to result in a significant decrease in the diversity of the syrphid fauna. Zusammenfassung Aus den französischen Départments Allier, Cher, Cote d’Or, Indre, Indre-et- Loire, Loir-et-Cher, Loiret, Nièvre, Saône-et-Loire and Yonne werden 223 Arten der Syrphidae gemeldet. Der Verbleib der Belegexemplare ist angegeben. Die ökologi­ sche Bilanz dieser Regionalfauna wird durch Vergleich zwischen den Habitat­ präferenzen der Arten dieser Liste mit Artenlisten fur Nord-Frankreich, Großbritan­ nien, Irland und die atlantische Zone Europas erörtert.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feasibility of Reintroducing Pine Martens to the Forest of Dean And
    The feasibility of reintroducing pine martens ( Martes martes ) to the Forest of Dean and lower Wye Valley May 2018 Authors: Stringer AP 1, MacPherson J2, Carter S2, Gill R 3, Ambrose-Oji B 3, Wilson R 4, Kelsall P 4, Feirn WG, Galbraith LC, Hilário CM, Parry G 1 & Taylor A 1. 1 Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust, Conservation Centre, Robinswood Hill Country Park, Reservoir Road, Gloucester, GL4 6SX. 2 The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire, HR8 1EP. 3 Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey, GU10 4LH. 4 Forestry Commission, Bank House, Bank Street, Coleford, Gloucestershire, GL16 8BA. Acknowledgements : We would like to thank Johnny Birks, Jonathan Spencer, Kevin Stannard, Lauren Harrington, Xavier Lambin, Emma Sheehy, Mike Townsend, Kat Walsh (and staff at Natural England), Henry Schofield, David Priddis, Roger Ransome, Freya Durham, Rob Lambert, Andrew Brook, members of the UK pine marten strategy group, and a number of local stakeholders for their in-depth and interesting discussions and review of the feasibility study. Many thanks to the volunteer group for all their hard work, and in particular to Ali Moss, Alex Blundell, and Nick Martin. The study is indebted to the British Society for Shooting and Conservation, and the National Gamekeepers Organisation, in particular Ian Danby, Sam Walker, and Julian Murray-Evans, for the collaborative survey of their members. We would also like to thank Bianca Ambrose-Oji, Michael Dunn, and Mark Atkinson for their time and effort on the accompanying report “Pine martens in the Forest of Dean: Stakeholder and public attitudes”. We would also like to thank ‘The Dutch National Database Flora and Fauna’ for their help.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Southern Grass Moors Heather
    á 1 Natural Environment Research Council Institute of Terrestrial Ecology INSTITUTE OF TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY LIBRARY SERVICE EDINBURGH LABORATORIES BUSH ESTATE, PENICUIK MIDLOTHIAN EH26 OQB MOORLAND MANAGEMENT: A STUDY OF EXMOOR A report commissioned by the Countryside Commission G R Miller, J Miles Banchory Research Station Hill of Brathens Banchory Kincardineshire and 0 W Heal Merlewood Research Station Grange-over-Sands Cumbria Printed in Great Britain by NERC/SERC Reprographic Services, Swindon C NERC Copyright 1984 Published in 1984 by Institute of Terrestrial Ecology rrUTE OF 68 Hills Road Cambridge CB2 1LA ECOLOGY LAEY ISBN 0 904282 79 1 a\11(1:17. 30 OCT1984 COVER ILLUSTRATION Mosaic map of Exmoor by C B Benefield from photographs by G R Miller and J Miles The Institute of Terrestrial Ecology was (ITE) established in 1973, from the former Nature Conservancy's research stations and staff, joined later by the Institute of Tree Biology and the Culture Centre of Algae and Protozoa. ITE contributes to, and draws upon, the collective knowledge of the 14 sister institutes which make up the Natural Environment Research Council, spanning all the environmental sciences. The Institute studies the factors determining the structure, composition and processes of land and freshwater systems, and of individual plant and animal species. It is developing a sounder scientific basis for predicting and modelling environmental trends arising from natural or man-made change. The results of this research are available to those responsible for the protection, management and wise use of our natural resources. One quarter of ITE's work is research commissioned by customers, such as the Department of Environment, the European Economic Community, the Nature Conservancy Council and the Overseas Development Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Den Sites Used by Pine Martens Martes Martes: a Response to the Scarcity of Arboreal Cavities?
    Blackwell Publishing LtdOxford, UKMAMMammal Review0305-1838Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2005? 2005353&4313320Review ArticleDiversity of pine marten densJ. D. S. Birks, J. E. Messenger and E. C. Halliwell Mammal Rev. 2005, Volume 35, No. 3&4, 313–320. Printed in Singapore. Diversity of den sites used by pine martens Martes martes: a response to the scarcity of arboreal cavities? JOHNNY D. S. BIRKS*, JOHN E. MESSENGER* and ELISABETH C. HALLIWELL† *The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP, UK, †Countryside Council for Wales, Plas Penrhos, Ffordd Penrhos, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2LQ, UK ABSTRACT 1. We compiled a sample of 370 pine marten dens to test the hypothesis that a scarcity of sites leads to the use of suboptimal structures. 2. The sample was influenced by detection methods. Radio-tracking revealed cryptic dens but few natal dens; chance encounters revealed dens in buildings and other man-made structures. A total of 82.8% of natal dens were detected by chance encounters. 3. Most dens were associated with trees (44.3%), rocks (27.6%) and buildings (13.8%). The natal den subsample comprised buildings (44.3%), trees (22.8%), other man-made structures (17.1%) and rocks (14.3%). A total of 69.6% of dens were elevated and typically in structures offering limited shelter. Only 9.8% of all dens were in elevated tree cavities. 4. This diversity of dens reflects a scarcity of arboreal cavities. The alternative structures are suboptimal in terms of energetic costs and risks of predation, and this may limit breeding success in some populations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation of Invertebrates
    (—; C.) N4I_ t MONKS WOOD EXPERIMENTAL STATION EF SYMPOSIUM No. I S9 2(063) March 23rd-25th, 1965 THE CONSERVATION OF INVERTEBRATES THE NATURE CONSERVANCY • I IIIONKB WOOD VAPERIMENTAL STATION. INSTITUTE OF TERREBTNIAL EGOLORT. ABBOTS [UPTON. HUNTINGDON. THE CONSERVATION OF INVERTEBRATES A Symposium held at Monks Wood Experimental Station March 23rd - 25th 1965 Organised by the Conservation Research Section Proceedings edited by Dr. Eric Duffey and Dr. M. G. Morris tIONK8 WOOD WERIMENTAL 8TATION, •INOTITUTE.OF TEORESTD1.11. ECOLOGY, ABBOTO RIPION, HUNTIMIDON. 5q2_(061) SYMPæIUM on the CONSERVATION of INVERTEBRATES C ONTENTS Page Programme and Summary 00 1 List of Participants .. .. .. .. 5 Opening Address - Invertebrate Conservation in relation to the Conservancy's commitments and .the development of its research program:no. E. Duffey .. .. .. .. 00 00 06 00 The Fate of areas of invertebrate intereSt as listed in 1949. J. F. D. Frazer .. .. .. .. .. 16 Extinctions and Invasions - some case histories and conclusions.J. E. Satchell .. .. .. 19 Invertebrate Conservation and Management Plans. E. 29Duffey Status and Conservation of the Large Blue Butterfly, Maculinea arion L. 0. D. Hunt .. 35 The Conservation of Dragonflies in Britain. N. W. Moore45. Basic ecological knowledge required for invertebrate conservation. E. Broadhead .. .. .. 52 Why we need invertebrate surveys. M. G. Morris . 65 Organization and Practice of intensive surveys. W. O. Steel .. .. • .. .. 71 Soma Features of Conservation Interest arising from surveys. A. M. Massee .. .. .. .. .. .. 00 77 The Role of Invertebrate Collections in the Conservancy. T. Huxley .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 83 General Discussion .. 89 á PROGRAMMEand SUIVARY This meetingwas the firststaff symposium to be held at MonksWood and was attendedby 32 representativesfrom neaply ea the regionaloffices inEngland',Wales and Scotland; the Research Stationsand SpecialistBranches.
    [Show full text]
  • American Mink (Mustela Vison) and Its Impact on Native Species in the UK
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk The Plymouth Student Scientist - Volume 01 - 2008 The Plymouth Student Scientist - Volume 1, No. 2 - 2008 2008 American Mink (Mustela vison) and its impact on native species in the UK Rey, A. Rey, A. (2008) 'American Mink (Mustela vison) and its impact on native species in the UK', The Plymouth Student Scientist, 1(2), pp. 302-314. http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/13817 The Plymouth Student Scientist University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. The Plymouth Student Scientist, 2008, 1, (2), 302-314 American Mink (Mustela vison) and its impact on native species in the UK Alex W. Rey 2008 Project Advisor: Stephen Burchett, School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA Abstract Introduced alien species are recognised to be a major threat to native biodiversity. The American mink (Mustela vison) is a highly adaptable, naturalised predator in the UK, introduced as part of the fur trade in the 1920‟s. The species became established in the wild in the 1950‟s through purposeful releases and escapes and since establishing the mink has been held accountable for the decline of many native species, most notably the water vole (Arvicola terrestris).
    [Show full text]
  • Great Britain
    Great Britain This article is about the island. For the state of which 1.1 Toponymy it is part, see United Kingdom. For the historical state, see Kingdom of Great Britain. For other uses, see Great Britain (disambiguation) and Britain (disambiguation). Main article: Britain (place name) Great Britain, also known as Britain, is a large island The archipelago has been referred to by a single name in the north Atlantic Ocean off the northwest coast of for over 2000 years: the term 'British Isles' derives from continental Europe. With an area of 209,331 km2 terms used by classical geographers to describe this is- (80,823 sq mi), Great Britain is the largest of the British land group. By 50 BC Greek geographers were using equivalents of Prettanikē as a collective name for the Isles, the largest European island, and the ninth-largest [11] island in the world.[5][note 1] In 2011 the island had a pop- British Isles. However, with the Roman conquest of ulation of about 61 million people, making it the world’s Britain the Latin term Britannia was used for the island of Great Britain, and later Roman-occupied Britain south third-most populous island after Java in Indonesia and [12][13][14] Honshu in Japan.[7][8] The island of Ireland is situated to of Caledonia. the west of it, and together these islands, along with over The earliest known name for Great Britain is Albion 1,000 smaller surrounding islands, comprise the British (Greek: Ἀλβίων) or insula Albionum, from either the Isles archipelago.[9] Latin albus meaning “white” (referring to the white The island is dominated by a maritime climate with quite cliffs of Dover, the first view of Britain from the con- narrow temperature differences between seasons.
    [Show full text]