British Birds |

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

British Birds | VOL. L MAY No. 5 1957 BRITISH BIRDS THE PAST AND PRESENT STATUS OF THE BUZZARD m THE BRITISH ISLES* By N. W. MOORE INTRODUCTION MYXOMATOSIS spread from the Continent of Europe to the British Isles late in the summer of 1953. The Buzzard (Buteo buteo), which was known to feed extensively on Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), was likely to be indirectly affected by the disease, so that the time appeared most opportune for making a special study of this particular hawk. An ecological investigation of the species seemed particularly worth making in any case because the Buzzard is much the commonest large bird of prey now occurring in Britain. Accordingly, early in 1954, the Scientific Advisory Committee of the British Trust for Ornithology accepted the proposed survey as one of its "Trust-aided investigations", with the writer as organizer. The Nature Conservancy gave generous support to the Survey by allowing the writer to spend part of his working time on it and by giving much secretarial help. The aim of the first (1954) survey was to record the Buzzard's status before it could be seriously affected by myxomatosis. In the course of writing a paper on the results of this 1954 survey, the writer was asked by the Editors of British Birds to contribute an article on the Buzzard for this series on birds of prey (see also antea, pp. 129-155), with the result that the original paper was modified and further historical research was undertaken, so that the final paper could perform the dual r61e of summarizing the 1954 Buzzard Survey and forming a part of the series on British birds of prey. *A Report to the British Trust for Ornithology. 173 174 BRITISH BIRDS [VOL. L The detailed aims of the paper are: — (i) To summarize what is known about the Buzzard's Status before 1954. {2) To summarize the data of the 1954 Buzzard Survey. (3) To sketch the Buzzard's eeological Status in Britain to-day. (4) To discuss the causes of popuiation changes of the Buzzard during the last 150 years. DISTRIBUTION IN THE FAST The main sources of Information about the distribution of the Buzzard in the past are the writings of conternporary naturalists. To-day the other large birds of prey are so rare that errors due to wrong identification must be slight. But when three species of harrier (Circus spp.), the Kite (Milvus milvus) and the Honey Buzzard (Pernis apivorus) could all be seen rnüre or less frequently in Britain, all records, except those of reliable ornithologists, are suspect. John Ray (1678) distinguished between the Buzzard or Puttock, the Kite, the Honey Buzzard and the Bald Buzzard (Osprey, Pandion haliaetus) and the Moor Buzzard (Marsh Harrier, C. aeruginosus) and Ringtail or Hen Harrier (C. cyaneus)*, but probably few of his countrymen did. The Situation was further confused because the words, Buzzard, Puttock, Kite, Gled, Glede, meant different species according to region—all could refer to Buteo buteo.. Recognition of these sources of error must be taken before accepting any records of a Buzzard. In this section the past has been divided for convenience into four unequal periods. Each period is introduced with a summary of factors which were likely to have affected the Status of the Buzzard at that time. 1. Pleistocene and Recent until 1100 A.D. After the last ice age, Britain was largely covered by forest, and the Rabbit which was to become an important source of food, either had not yet been introduced into the country, or if it had, was a rare animal. Fossil bones of Buteo species have been found as follows: — Pleistocene. Devon (Brixham Cave) (Bell, 1915) Somerset (Clevedon) ,, ,, Kent (Ightham) „ ,, *This would include Montagu's Harrier (C. pygargus) which had not then been separated. VOL. L] THE BUZZARD IN BRITAIN 175 Neolithic. Orkneys (Rousay) (Platt in Callender, 1934) Roman. Dorset (Weymouth) (Carreck, 1955) West Meath (Lagore) (Hencken, 1950) These records cannot be used as proof that the Buzzard occurred in Britain at the times indicated: some of the bones may be those of the Rough-legged Buzzard (B. lagopus). However, Mr. R. W. Sims of the British Museum (Natural History) reports that some bones of these species can be determined specifically; it would be worth while to re-examine this material. 2. noo-ijgg. During this time most of Britain was cleared of woodland and eventually enclosed, and the Rabbit became one of our most abundant species. During the last years of the i8th Century game preservation began to have a significant effect on the fauna of England.* In an Act of James II of Scotland (1457) the Buzzard is listed as one of the "foulys of reif" to be destroyed. In the law 25 Henry VIII, CII, in which egg stealing was forbidden, it was stated that the act did not extend to such as kill "crows, choughs, ravens and buzzards". During the i7th Century the Church- warden of Tenterden in Kent paid id. or 2d. for every Buzzard head brought to him (Ticehurst, 1920). William Turner (1544) mentions the Buzzard and says that it was seen at all times. About this time a difference was made between the Buzzard and the Moor Buzzard (Marsh Harrier). The fact that the word "Buzzard" developed the secondary meaning of a worthless, stupid or ignorant person, suggests that it was well known. Culinary and medicinal qualities of the Buzzard were extolled by Lovell in 1661. The first reliable record of the Common Buzzard is that of John Ray (1678). The fact that he gives no details of distribution suggests that it was generally distributed in the i7th Century. It remained so in the i8th Century when Pennant described it as the "commonest of the hawk kind we have in England" (1776) and when John Latham called it "a bird known by everyone" (1781). The first records of individual specimens and exact localities belong to the end of the i8th Century. 3. i8oo-igi$. During this period most of the remaining waste lands were reclaimed, large areas became industrialized and, in the second half of it, agriculture declined. Rabbits became much commoner. Game preservation became one of the principal activities of the countryside. The Highlands were opened up to the visiting sports- *As early as 1768 R. Smith suggested ways of catching Buzzards among other "winged vermin" in order to protect pheasantries and warrens. 176 BRITISH BIRDS [VOL. L ! 1 II II 1 tjfl lss| 1 VOL. L] THE BUZZARD IN BRITAIN 177 *%&* . MKp £^ <^^ ^^H^EQcs^!^ a ™ VI 0 4 a 05 195 3 tt M *%- . X H fc WKg^ &^ ^"^ £3 V-—-^^V ) 6 IV{ 6 0 190 178 BRITISH BIRDS [VOL. L men (the railway reached Perth in 1849, Inverness in 1861 and Thurso in 1874). The breech-loader was invented in 1853. The vogue for making private collections of birds and eggs was at its height, though the first Wild Birds Protection Act was passed in 1880. At the beginning of the Century it is probable that the Buzzard bred in practically every county of the British Isles. It appears to have been commoner in England than Scotland (Yarrell, 1837). As late as 1846 Macgillivray stated that it was generally distributed in Britain and "occurs also in Ireland". But the decline that had begun in, the early years of the Century increased. In the 1860's A. G. More organized his pioneer survey of the distribution of the country's breeding birds by means of a simple and effective questionnaire. From the information received he desCribed the Buzzard as "by no means common and nearly exterminated in the eastern and midland counties of England" (More, 1865). It held out in Essex until 1865, in East Sussex until 1882, and in Lincoln- shire until 1888. By 1897 it was sufficiently rare for Dixon to include it in his "Lost and Vanishing Birds" and to State that it would become extinct "if persecution be not relaxed". The species had become a protected bird in 1880. In the B.O.U. list of 1915, the distribution is described as "West and Central Scotland, Inner Hebrides, Lakes, Wales, Devon and Cornwall commonly, Pennines sparingly". 4. 1916-1954. The two world wars caused revivals in agriculture, but between them there was a decline. Towns became much larger. The two wars and the economic depression caused a reduction in the size of estates and decreases in game-preservation. Bird-watching became populär: the collecting of specimens was largely superseded by the collecting of records. By the end' of the first world war the Buzzard had returned to much of its old ränge in Southern England, the Welsh Border country and elsewhere (see Witherby, 1924). In some districts it was later exterminated, but in others it held its own. In 1929 H. G. Hurrell organised a special study of the species in Devon for the newly formed Devon Bird Watching and Preservation Society (1929). 46 pairs of Buzzards were recorded in a total area of 305.79 sq. miles. From this Hurrell estimated that the total Buzzard population in Devon at the beginning of the breeding-season in 1929 was between 900 and 1,200 birds. At the onset of the second' world war, it was found breeding regularly in Hampshire, Dorset, Somerset, Hereford and Shropshire. Further west it had become very numerous. In 1946 W. J. Ashford made a study of the species in Dorset (Blathwayt, 1947). He located about 20 pairs, but probably considerably more bred or attempted to do so. There is some evidence to suggest that the year of greatest VOL.
Recommended publications
  • Hunting and Game Preservation Act
    HUNTING AND GAME PRESERVATION ACT Prom. SG. 78/26 Sep 2000, amend. SG. 26/20 Mar 2001, amend. SG. 77/9 Aug 2002, amend. SG. 79/16 Aug 2002, amend. SG. 88/4 Nov 2005, amend. SG. 82/10 Oct 2006, amend. SG. 108/29 Dec 2006, amend. SG. 64/7 Aug 2007, amend. SG. 43/29 Apr 2008, amend. SG. 67/29 Jul 2008, amend. SG. 69/5 Aug 2008, amend. SG. 91/21 Oct 2008, amend. SG. 6/23 Jan 2009, amend. SG. 80/9 Oct 2009, amend. SG. 92/20 Nov 2009, amend. SG. 73/17 Sep 2010, amend. SG. 89/12 Nov 2010, amend. SG. 8/25 Jan 2011, amend. SG. 19/8 Mar 2011, amend. SG. 39/20 May 2011, amend. SG. 77/4 Oct 2011, amend. SG. 38/18 May 2012, amend. SG. 60/7 Aug 2012, amend. SG. 77/9 Oct 2012, amend. SG. 102/21 Dec 2012, amend. SG. 15/15 Feb 2013, amend. SG. 62/12 Jul 2013, amend. SG. 60/7 Aug 2015, amend. SG. 14/19 Feb 2016, amend. SG. 58/18 Jul 2017, amend. SG. 63/4 Aug 2017, amend. and suppl. SG. 17/23 Feb 2018, suppl. SG. 61/24 Jul 2018, suppl. SG. 77/18 Sep 2018, amend. and suppl. SG. 37/7 May 2019, amend. and suppl. SG. 74/20 Sep 2019 Chapter one. GENERAL PROVISIONS Art. 1. The Act shall provide the relations connected with the ownership, preservation and management of the game, the organisation of hunting economy, the right to hunt and the trade with game and game products.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Rabbit: Plague, Polices and Pestilence in England and Wales, 1931–1955
    The wild rabbit: plague, polices and pestilence in England and Wales, 1931–1955 by John Martin Abstract Since the eighteenth century the rabbit has occupied an ambivalent position in the countryside. Not only were they of sporting value but they were also valued for their meat and pelt. Attitudes to the rabbit altered though over the first half of the century, and this paper traces their redefinition as vermin. By the 1930s, it was appreciated that wild rabbits were Britain’s most serious vertebrate pest of cereal crops and grassland and that their numbers were having a significant effect on agricultural output. Government took steps to destroy rabbits from 1938 and launched campaigns against them during wartime, when rabbit was once again a form of meat. Thereafter government attitudes to the rabbit hardened, but it was not until the mid-1950s that pestilence in the form of a deadly virus, myxomatosis, precipitated an unprecedented decline in their population. The unprecedented decline in the European rabbit Oryctolagus( cuniculus) in the mid- twentieth century is one of the most remarkable ecological changes to have taken place in Britain. Following the introduction of myxomatosis into Britain in September 1953 at Bough Beech near Edenbridge in Kent, mortality rates in excess of 99.9 per cent were recorded in a number of affected areas.1 Indeed, in December 1954, the highly respected naturalist Robin Lockley speculated that 1955 would constitute ‘zero hour for the rabbit’, with numbers being lower by the end of the year than at any time since the eleventh century.2 In spite of the rapid increases in output and productivity which British agriculture experienced in the post-myxomatosis era, the importance of the disease as a causal factor in raising agricultural output has been largely ignored by agricultural historians.3 The academic neglect of the rabbit as a factor influencing productivity is even more apparent in respect of the pre-myxomatosis era, particularly the period before the Second World War.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipterists Digest
    ipterists Digest Dipterists’ Digest is a popular journal aimed primarily at field dipterists in the UK, Ireland and adjacent countries, with interests in recording, ecology, natural history, conservation and identification of British and NW European flies. Articles may be of any length up to 3000 words. Items exceeding this length may be serialised or printed in full, depending on the competition for space. They should be in clear concise English, preferably typed double spaced on one side of A4 paper. Only scientific names should be underlined- Tables should be on separate sheets. Figures drawn in clear black ink. about twice their printed size and lettered clearly. Enquiries about photographs and colour plates — please contact the Production Editor in advance as a charge may be made. References should follow the layout in this issue. Initially the scope of Dipterists' Digest will be:- — Observations of interesting behaviour, ecology, and natural history. — New and improved techniques (e.g. collecting, rearing etc.), — The conservation of flies and their habitats. — Provisional and interim reports from the Diptera Recording Schemes, including provisional and preliminary maps. — Records of new or scarce species for regions, counties, districts etc. — Local faunal accounts, field meeting results, and ‘holiday lists' with good ecological information/interpretation. — Notes on identification, additions, deletions and amendments to standard key works and checklists. — News of new publications/references/iiterature scan. Texts concerned with the Diptera of parts of continental Europe adjacent to the British Isles will also be considered for publication, if submitted in English. Dipterists Digest No.1 1988 E d ite d b y : Derek Whiteley Published by: Derek Whiteley - Sheffield - England for the Diptera Recording Scheme assisted by the Irish Wildlife Service ISSN 0953-7260 Printed by Higham Press Ltd., New Street, Shirland, Derby DE5 6BP s (0773) 832390.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOS 37-2-60 Reintroductions and Releases on the Isle Of
    ECOS 37(2) 2016 ECOS 37(2) 2016 Reintroductions and releases on the Isle of Man Lessons from recent retreats Recent proposals for the release of white-tailed sea eagles and red squirrels on the Isle of Man received very different treatment, perhaps reflecting public perception of the animals and the public profile of the proponents, but also the political landscape of the island. NICK PINDER The Manx legal context The Isle of Man is a Crown dependency outside the EU but inside a common customs union with the United Kingdom. The Island can request that Westminster’s laws are extended to it but usually the Island passes its own laws which it promulgates at the annual Tynwald ceremony. Since it has a special relationship with the European Union, under Protocol 3, EU legislation covering agricultural and other trade is Point of Ayre: The Ayres is a large area of coastal heath and dune grassland in the north of the Isle of Mann usually translated into Manx law, as is UK law affecting customs controls. The 1980 island and location of the only National Nature Reserve. Endangered Species Act was therefore swiftly adopted in the Isle of Man but the Photo: Nick Pinder Wildlife and Countryside Act of the same year was not. A test for the legislation came in the early 1990s when some fox carcases turned When I arrived on the Isle of Man in 1987, the only wildlife legislation was a up. One was allegedly run over and then someone came forward having shot two dated Protection of Birds Act (1932-1975) but the newly formed Department of adults at a den site and dug up several cubs.
    [Show full text]
  • “Brilliant Britain” on Stamps
    Stamp Fun “Brilliant Britain” on Stamps £3.00 Stamp Active Network In association with The Great Britain Philatelic Society Welcome to Stamp Active Stamp Active is a voluntary organisation which promotes stamp collecting for young people in the UK. This pack provides some activities for you to complete. If you finish five of the activities in the pack, please take it to one of the organisers at a Stamp Active event and you will receive a prize. There is plenty more for you to do in the pack or you can have a go at some of the other stamp competitions promoted by Stamp Active. The pack is yours to keep and it will give you a useful guide to some of the varied aspects of stamp collecting. Have Fun! Kids Corner, sponsored by The Philatelic Traders Society, Stamp Active Network is supported by major sponsors which takes place at Spring and Autumn Stampex, held including The Philatelic Fund, Stanley Gibbons, at the Business Design Centre, Islington, London. The Association of British Philatelic Societies, The Philatelic Traders Society, and The Great Britain Philatelic Society The Stamp Active Competition, sponsored by the as well as many other dealers, individuals and clubs and GBPS and The British Youth Stamp Championships, societies. Special thanks to Ian Varey for his development sponsored by Stanley Gibbons, for those interested in of the ideas for this activity pack. displaying their collections. We are always in need of financial donations or the gift Stamp Active Web Site to find out more about collecting of stamps, covers and other material.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Assessment for Reinforcing Pine Marten Numbers in England and Wales
    Feasibility Assessment for Reinforcing Pine Marten Numbers in England and Wales Jenny MacPherson The Vincent Wildlife Trust 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire, HR8 1EP November 2014 Co-authors and contributors ELIZABETH CROOSE The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP DAVID BAVIN The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP DECLAN O’MAHONY Agri-Food and Bioscience Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland JONATHAN P. SOMPER Greenaway, 44 Estcourt Road, Gloucester, GL1 3LG NATALIE BUTTRISS The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP Acknowledgements We would like to thank Johnny Birks, Robbie McDonald, Steven Tapper, Sean Christian and David Bullock for their input and helpful comments and discussion during the preparation of this report. We are also grateful to Paul Bright, Liz Halliwell, Huw Denman, Kenny Kortland, Colin Seddon, Roisin Campbell-Palmer, Peter Lack, Roger Powell, Pete Turner, Catherine O’Reilly, members and staff of the Dutch Mammal Society, Henry Schofield, Hilary Macmillan, Kate McAney, Orly Razgour and Matthieu Lundy for their help and advice. The questionnaire survey in chapter 5 was carried out as part of the People & Pine Martens in Wales project, funded by the Welsh Co-operative to whom we owe thanks. We are grateful to all organisations and individuals who publicised the online survey, including the People’s Trust for Endangered Species, the Federation of City Farms and Community Gardens, The Mammal Society, Denmark Farm, Gwent Wildlife Trust and Brecknock Wildlife Trust, and to all those who took time to complete the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Discontent in Derbyshire 1830·1850
    RURAL DISCONTENT IN DERBYSHIRE 1830·1850 Alan Frank Jones Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Sheffield January 2004 ii Alan Frank Jones RURAL DISCONTENT IN DERBYSlllRE 1830-1850 ABSTRACT Social protest, especially in agricultural regions, has occupie~ and caused considerable debate among, historians for many years. This thesis seeks to add to this debate, by looking at various forms of protest in Derbyshire between 1830 and 1850. This thesis examines three aspects of criminal activity: poaching, arson and animal maiming. It contends that none of these crimes can simply be categorised as acts of protest. In conjunction with an investigation of these three crimes, acts of protest such as strikes and episodes of reluctance to conform are also discussed. It argues that the motives behind various criminal activities and anti-authority behaviour were varied and complex. Arson and animal maiming were rarely co-ordinated, mostly they were individual attacks. However, on a few occasions both arson and animal maiming were directed against certain people. In the instances of poaching, there were more proven cases of gang participation than in either arson or animal maiming, with groups of men raiding game preserves. However, the great majority of raids were individual undertakings. What is more, poaching was carried out on a greater scale throughout the county than either arson or animal maiming. This thesis seeks to put these activities into the context of economic and social change in Derbyshire between 1830 and 1850. It maintains that there was a breaking down of the old social order.
    [Show full text]
  • POVERTY, PROTEST and SPORT: POACHING in the EAST MIDLANDS C.1820-C.1900 ROSEMARY MUGE, MA. Thesis Submitted to the University Of
    POVERTY, PROTEST AND SPORT: POACHING IN THE EAST MIDLANDS c.1820-c.1900 ROSEMARY MUGE, MA. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2017 Abstract In the East Midlands counties of Derbyshire, Leicestershire and Nottinghamshire levels of poaching equalled or exceeded those in many counties which are thought of as prime poaching areas. Using principally Criminal Registers, Game Laws Returns to Parliament, and local newspapers of the period, this study shows that people poached from three motives: because they were poor; because poaching was a sport; and as a protest. Day and night poachers, including night poaching gangs frequently involved in affrays, pursued their activities undeterred by the efforts at prevention of the landowners, police and courts. Poaching here was predominantly for ground game and declined in the last quarter of the century, but continued to be a source of anger and frustration for game preservers and the authorities to the end of the period. The poaching war in these counties, waged in an area with large aristocratic estates but where extreme game preservation was viewed critically, was not perceived as impacting on law and order in general. This was unlike Lancashire, where the activities of poachers were regarded as being a threat to the fabric of society. The causes of these differences between the East Midlands and Lancashire were rooted in police practice, attitudes to game preservation, and differences in gentry sport and hunting. (Total words in thesis: 90,313) Acknowledgements Having begun to study history twenty years ago and finally submitted this thesis in retirement, there are many people to whom I am beholden.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution and Status of the Polecat (Mustela Putorius) in Britain 2014-2015
    The Distribution and Status of the Polecat (Mustela putorius) in Britain 2014-2015 Elizabeth Croose 2016 1 Contents 1 Acknowledgements 3.4.2.4 South-east England 16 3.4.2.5 East of England 17 2 Summary 3.4.2.6 Northern England 17 3.4.3 Scotland 18 3 19 1. Introduction 3.5 Defining ‘Polecat Purity Zones’ 3.5.1 Changes in ‘Polecat Purity Zones’ since the 2004-2006 survey 20 1.1 Introduction to the polecat 3 3.6 Carcass collection 21 1.2 History in Britain 3 1.3 Previous distribution surveys 4 4 22 1.4 Survey aims 4. Discussion 22 5 4.1 Distributional change since the 2004-2006 survey 2. Methods 4.2 Reasons for polecat range expansion 23 2.1 Record collection 5 4.3 Prospects and threats to future recovery 24 2.2 Publicity 5 4.3.1 Prospects for future recovery 24 2.3 Record verification 6 4.3.2 Potential threats to future recovery 24 2.4 Carcass collection 6 4.3.2.1 Trapping mortality 24 4.3.2.2 Secondary rodenticide poisoning 25 7 4.3.2.3 Status of the rabbit population 25 3. Results 4.3.2.4 Hybridisation between polecats and ferrets 25 3.1 Record collection 7 4.4 The status of the polecat elsewhere in Europe 27 3.2 Origins of records 7 4.5 Recommendations for future work 27 3.2.1 Road casualties 8 4.5.1 Monitoring polecats 27 3.2.2 Live sightings 9 4.5.2 Investigating threats to polecats 27 3.2.3 Live trapped 9 4.5.3 Raising awareness and promoting understanding 27 3.2.4 Dead (other) 11 4.5.4 Improving confidence in polecat records 28 3.2.5 Camera trap 11 3.3 Seasonal patterns 12 3.4 Distribution of records 13 28 5.
    [Show full text]
  • (2004) Pine Marten in Nidderdale. Yorks. Nat. Un. Bull. 42: 13
    Changes in the status and distribution of mammals of the order Carnivora in Yorkshire from 1600. County history of the fox, badger, otter, pine marten, stoat, weasel, polecat, American mink, wildcat and domestic cat. Item Type Thesis Authors Howes, Colin Anthony Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 24/09/2021 19:26:55 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/4306 BIBLIOGRAPHY Adams, R. (2004) Pine marten in Nidderdale. Yorks. Nat. Un. Bull. 42: 13. Alcock, I, and Warsop, P. (1982) Diet, distribution and habitat preference of stoats and weasels in Sheffield. Sorby Record 20: 5-10. Anderson-Bledsoe, K.L. and Scanlon, P.E. (1983) Heavy metal concentrations in tissues of Virginia river otters. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 30: 442-447. Andrews, R. (1879) The badger near Pickering. Naturalist 5: 153. Anon. (1880a) Land & Water. Anon. (1880b) Yorkshire Post. Anon. (1881a) The Field, 1.10.1881: 504. Anon. (1881b) Yorkshire Post, 21.6.1881. Anon. (1882a) YNU Circular for Excursion to Grassington 7.8.1882. Anon. (1882b) Yorkshire Post, 23rd May 1882. Anon. (1883) Leeds Express, 24 August 1883. Anon. (1886) Mammals. In YNU Circular 3 for Excursion to Pateley Bridge 17.7.1886. Anon. (1887) The Field, 28 5.1887.
    [Show full text]
  • Syrphidae (Díptera) of Central France
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Volucella - Die Schwebfliegen-Zeitschrift Jahr/Year: 1996 Band/Volume: 2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Speight Martin C. D. Artikel/Article: Syrphidae (Diptera) of Central France 20-35 ©Volucella; Dieter Doczkal (München) und Ulrich Schmid (Stuttgart), download www.zobodat.at 20 VoLUCELLA 2 (1/2), 1996 Syrphidae (Díptera) of Central France Martin C.D. Speight Speight, M.C.D. (1996): Syrphidae (Diptera) of Central France. - Volucella 2 (1/2), 20-35. Stuttgart. Records are presented for 223 species of Syrphidae, derived from the region of France comprising the Départements of Allier, Cher, Cote d ’Or, Indre, Indre-et- Loire, Loir-et-Cher, Loiret, Nièvre, Saône-et-Loire and Yonne. Location of reference specimens is indicated. The ecological balance of this regional fauna is explored, by comparison between the habitat preferences of the species on this list and syrphid lists for North France, Great Britain, Ireland and the Atlantic zone of Europe in general. This shows that, at any location in the Atlantic zone, conversion of deciduous forest to conifer forest can be expected to result in a significant decrease in the diversity of the syrphid fauna. Zusammenfassung Aus den französischen Départments Allier, Cher, Cote d’Or, Indre, Indre-et- Loire, Loir-et-Cher, Loiret, Nièvre, Saône-et-Loire and Yonne werden 223 Arten der Syrphidae gemeldet. Der Verbleib der Belegexemplare ist angegeben. Die ökologi­ sche Bilanz dieser Regionalfauna wird durch Vergleich zwischen den Habitat­ präferenzen der Arten dieser Liste mit Artenlisten fur Nord-Frankreich, Großbritan­ nien, Irland und die atlantische Zone Europas erörtert.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feasibility of Reintroducing Pine Martens to the Forest of Dean And
    The feasibility of reintroducing pine martens ( Martes martes ) to the Forest of Dean and lower Wye Valley May 2018 Authors: Stringer AP 1, MacPherson J2, Carter S2, Gill R 3, Ambrose-Oji B 3, Wilson R 4, Kelsall P 4, Feirn WG, Galbraith LC, Hilário CM, Parry G 1 & Taylor A 1. 1 Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust, Conservation Centre, Robinswood Hill Country Park, Reservoir Road, Gloucester, GL4 6SX. 2 The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire, HR8 1EP. 3 Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey, GU10 4LH. 4 Forestry Commission, Bank House, Bank Street, Coleford, Gloucestershire, GL16 8BA. Acknowledgements : We would like to thank Johnny Birks, Jonathan Spencer, Kevin Stannard, Lauren Harrington, Xavier Lambin, Emma Sheehy, Mike Townsend, Kat Walsh (and staff at Natural England), Henry Schofield, David Priddis, Roger Ransome, Freya Durham, Rob Lambert, Andrew Brook, members of the UK pine marten strategy group, and a number of local stakeholders for their in-depth and interesting discussions and review of the feasibility study. Many thanks to the volunteer group for all their hard work, and in particular to Ali Moss, Alex Blundell, and Nick Martin. The study is indebted to the British Society for Shooting and Conservation, and the National Gamekeepers Organisation, in particular Ian Danby, Sam Walker, and Julian Murray-Evans, for the collaborative survey of their members. We would also like to thank Bianca Ambrose-Oji, Michael Dunn, and Mark Atkinson for their time and effort on the accompanying report “Pine martens in the Forest of Dean: Stakeholder and public attitudes”. We would also like to thank ‘The Dutch National Database Flora and Fauna’ for their help.
    [Show full text]