Thermal Refugia and the Survival of Species in Changing Environments: New Evidence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thermal Refugia and the Survival of Species in Changing Environments: New Evidence 1 Title: Thermal refugia and the survival of species in changing environments: new evidence 2 from a nationally extinct freshwater fish. 3 4 Thomas A. Worthington1, Jeroen K. J. Van Houdt2, Joshua M. Hull3 and Paul S. Kemp1 5 6 1International Centre for Ecohydraulics Research, Engineering and the Environment, 7 University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK 8 2Centre for Human Genetics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 9 3Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, USA 10 11 12 13 Correspondence: Thomas A. Worthington, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff 14 CF10 3AX, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 15 Current Address: Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK 16 RUNNING HEAD: Burbot colonisation of English rivers 17 KEYWORDS: burbot, colonisation, freshwater fishes, glacial maximum, phylogeography. 18 19 20 "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Worthington, T. A., Van Houdt, 21 J. K. J., Hull, J. M. and Kemp, P. S. (2016), Thermal refugia and the survival of species in 22 changing environments: new evidence from a nationally extinct freshwater fish. Ecology 23 of Freshwater Fish, which has been published in final form at 24 https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eff.12285. This article may be used for non-commercial 25 purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving." 26 ABSTRACT 27 Variation in global climate during the Quaternary has helped shape current species 28 distributions. The stenohaline fish fauna of the British Isles is generally thought to have 29 colonised eastern England via a landbridge following the last glacial maximum. This theory 30 is investigated using the nationally extinct burbot, Lota lota, as a model species. Samples 31 were collected from 15 museum specimens of known English provenance and analysed for 32 differences in the mitochondrial DNA control region. The DNA analysis produced eight 33 sequences of 270 basepairs, with one sample reaching 420 basepairs in length. Genetic 34 analysis suggests the extinct English population of the burbot was a distinct lineage, differing 35 from those previously described from across the species’ global distribution. Despite this, 36 network analysis suggests that the English lineage is closely related to populations in western 37 Europe, supporting colonisation via a post-glacial landbridge. The rate of genetic divergence 38 suggests that the timing of L. lota’s colonisation of English rivers was prior to the last glacial 39 maximum. Lota lota appears to have survived the last glacial maximum in refugia within the 40 British Isles. This study adds to the evidence for a British freshwater refugia and furthers our 41 understanding of the colonisation history of British freshwater fishes. These results also 42 provide valuable information for conservation strategies for L. lota indicating the western 43 European clade as most genetically appropriate for potential future reintroductions to English 44 rivers. 45 INTRODUCTION 46 From the beginning of the Quaternary (2.6 million years before present, ybp) and the 47 formation of the Arctic ice cap to the present day, the Northern Hemisphere has been 48 subjected to cyclical patterns of ice sheet expansion and contraction (Hewitt 2000) which has 49 dramatically influenced the distribution and genetic structure of the current biota (Hewitt 50 1996; Dynesius and Jansson 2000). During the Quaternary glacial periods, temperate regions 51 of the Northern Hemisphere saw extinctions and southward shifts in species ranges, with a 52 corresponding recolonisation into northern areas during the warmer interglacials (Culling et 53 al. 2006). Phylogeographical analysis has suggested many western European species 54 persisted during these glacial periods in refugia located in Iberia, Italy, the Balkans-Greece 55 and the Caspian/Caucasus regions (Hewitt 2004). Terrestrial post-glacial colonisation 56 patterns have been described based on several model species (Hewitt 1999), with 57 geographical features such as mountain ranges and water bodies impacting species’ capacity 58 to disperse (Taberlet et al. 1998). Freshwater fishes, however, are restricted in their dispersal 59 ability by the interconnectedness of river catchments (Culling et al. 2006; Reyjol et al. 2007) 60 leading Hewitt (2004) to suggest a ‘new paradigm’ was required. Post-glacial colonisation of 61 European rivers appears to have been generally from the Black Sea via rivers such as the 62 Danube or Dnieper, although routes and glacial refugia are often species specific (Hewitt 63 2004; Makhrov and Bolotov 2006). More recent studies (e.g., Hänfling et al. 2002; Finnegan 64 et al. 2013) have suggested some species may have persisted in ‘cryptic northern refugia’ 65 (Stewart and Lister 2001). 66 67 In his paper, ‘The origin and distribution of the freshwater fishes of the British Isles’, 68 Wheeler (1977) discussed two potential mechanisms for the colonisation of British rivers by 69 stenohaline fishes. The first, proposed by (Scharff 1899) was that the freshwater fish species 70 of southern and eastern England colonised following the last glacial maximum during the 71 existence of a land bridge between Great Britain and Europe. The land bridge is thought to 72 have persisted until 7500 ybp, enabling the connection of the eastern English rivers from the 73 Humber through East Anglia, with the Rhine system as tributaries or through the formation of 74 a shared seasonal floodplain (Wheeler 1977). The second, proposed by Orkin (in Schindler 75 1957), was that certain species persisted in refugia during the last glacial maximum, having 76 established in British rivers during an earlier interglacial. Wheeler (1977) suggests that this 77 glacial refugia theory is unlikely, due to the unsuitable environmental conditions for 78 spawning, although he did advocate the possibility that both mechanisms may have been 79 possible. The landbridge theory would seem to be supported by the present day distribution 80 of freshwater fishes as species richness is reduced to the north and west of the British Isles 81 (Maitland and Lyle 1996), although this pattern is confused by human induced movements of 82 fishes or dispersal through canal systems (Wheeler and Easton 1978). 83 84 The distribution of the freshwater gadoid, the burbot Lota lota, stretches across North 85 America and Eurasia (Scott and Crossman 1973). Despite this extensive range many 86 populations, particularly in western Europe, are threatened with extirpation (Stapanian et al. 87 2010), while L. lota is thought to have become extinct in English rivers in the early 1970s 88 (Worthington et al. 2010). Recent analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequence variation in L. 89 lota from across its global distribution suggested division into two sub-species; L. l. lota 90 found in Eurasia and Alaska and L. l. maculosa from North America, south of the Great Slave 91 Lake (Van Houdt et al. 2005). After separation, the L. l. lota population was limited to a 92 glacial refuge from where it colonised Eurasia (Van Houdt et al. 2003). European L. lota have 93 been subjected to three or four subsequent glacial cycles, splitting the species into several 94 genetic clades (see Fig. 1 in Van Houdt et al. 2005). It is hypothesized that the English 95 population belonged to the western European clade owing to the likely colonisation of 96 English rivers via the landbridge that existed following the last glacial maximum. Lota lota’s 97 former English distribution corresponds well with this theory, as the species was restricted to 98 forty-two rivers in eastern England prior to extinction around the beginning of the 1970s 99 (Worthington et al. 2010). 100 101 The aim of this study was to examine the origin and timing of the colonisation of the British 102 stenohaline fish fauna using L. lota. Due to its recent extirpation from English rivers, L. lota 103 is subject to an investigation as to the feasibility of reintroduction to the rivers of its former 104 English range (Worthington et al. 2009). As such, understanding the genetic relationship 105 between the former English L. lota population and potential source populations is an 106 important consideration in reintroduction planning (Leonard 2008). 107 108 MATERIAL AND METHODS 109 SAMPLES 110 Tissue samples were collected from L. lota specimens known to have been captured in 111 England. Museums and universities with natural history collections were contacted to 112 determine whether they held preserved English L. lota, and samples were taken from those 113 with suitable specimens (Table 1). A sample of accessible material, either fin clips or muscle 114 tissue, was collected either by the institution’s staff or a trained taxidermist. The samples 115 were either from dried taxidermy specimens (n = 8) or fixed using formaldehyde and stored 116 using Industrial Methylated Spirit (IMS, n = 7). The English samples were then compared to 117 sequences from burbot collected from across the species’ global distribution (GenBank 118 accession numbers AY656840–AY656915; Van Houdt et al. 2005). 119 120 DNA EXTRACTION AND SEQUENCE ANALYSES 121 DNA analyses were carried out in a laboratory dedicated to the analyses of archival material. 122 Burbot material had never previously been sequenced within the building that housed the 123 laboratory, removing the possibility of contamination from samples outside the study. To 124 control for cross sample contamination, analyses were duplicated with a maximum of three 125 samples analysed concurrently. All sequencing was carried out in a laminar flow cabinet. 126 DNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin Extraction kit (Machery-Nagel GmBH). The 127 digestion, undertaken over a period of 3-5 hours, was enhanced by grinding the samples with 128 a pestle during the incubation phase, for larger tissue samples a double digestion volume was 129 used when required. The DNA from a single spin column was eluted twice with 50 µl of 130 heated elution buffer and stored separately.
Recommended publications
  • Ipterists Digest
    ipterists Digest Dipterists’ Digest is a popular journal aimed primarily at field dipterists in the UK, Ireland and adjacent countries, with interests in recording, ecology, natural history, conservation and identification of British and NW European flies. Articles may be of any length up to 3000 words. Items exceeding this length may be serialised or printed in full, depending on the competition for space. They should be in clear concise English, preferably typed double spaced on one side of A4 paper. Only scientific names should be underlined- Tables should be on separate sheets. Figures drawn in clear black ink. about twice their printed size and lettered clearly. Enquiries about photographs and colour plates — please contact the Production Editor in advance as a charge may be made. References should follow the layout in this issue. Initially the scope of Dipterists' Digest will be:- — Observations of interesting behaviour, ecology, and natural history. — New and improved techniques (e.g. collecting, rearing etc.), — The conservation of flies and their habitats. — Provisional and interim reports from the Diptera Recording Schemes, including provisional and preliminary maps. — Records of new or scarce species for regions, counties, districts etc. — Local faunal accounts, field meeting results, and ‘holiday lists' with good ecological information/interpretation. — Notes on identification, additions, deletions and amendments to standard key works and checklists. — News of new publications/references/iiterature scan. Texts concerned with the Diptera of parts of continental Europe adjacent to the British Isles will also be considered for publication, if submitted in English. Dipterists Digest No.1 1988 E d ite d b y : Derek Whiteley Published by: Derek Whiteley - Sheffield - England for the Diptera Recording Scheme assisted by the Irish Wildlife Service ISSN 0953-7260 Printed by Higham Press Ltd., New Street, Shirland, Derby DE5 6BP s (0773) 832390.
    [Show full text]
  • “Brilliant Britain” on Stamps
    Stamp Fun “Brilliant Britain” on Stamps £3.00 Stamp Active Network In association with The Great Britain Philatelic Society Welcome to Stamp Active Stamp Active is a voluntary organisation which promotes stamp collecting for young people in the UK. This pack provides some activities for you to complete. If you finish five of the activities in the pack, please take it to one of the organisers at a Stamp Active event and you will receive a prize. There is plenty more for you to do in the pack or you can have a go at some of the other stamp competitions promoted by Stamp Active. The pack is yours to keep and it will give you a useful guide to some of the varied aspects of stamp collecting. Have Fun! Kids Corner, sponsored by The Philatelic Traders Society, Stamp Active Network is supported by major sponsors which takes place at Spring and Autumn Stampex, held including The Philatelic Fund, Stanley Gibbons, at the Business Design Centre, Islington, London. The Association of British Philatelic Societies, The Philatelic Traders Society, and The Great Britain Philatelic Society The Stamp Active Competition, sponsored by the as well as many other dealers, individuals and clubs and GBPS and The British Youth Stamp Championships, societies. Special thanks to Ian Varey for his development sponsored by Stanley Gibbons, for those interested in of the ideas for this activity pack. displaying their collections. We are always in need of financial donations or the gift Stamp Active Web Site to find out more about collecting of stamps, covers and other material.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Assessment for Reinforcing Pine Marten Numbers in England and Wales
    Feasibility Assessment for Reinforcing Pine Marten Numbers in England and Wales Jenny MacPherson The Vincent Wildlife Trust 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire, HR8 1EP November 2014 Co-authors and contributors ELIZABETH CROOSE The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP DAVID BAVIN The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP DECLAN O’MAHONY Agri-Food and Bioscience Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland JONATHAN P. SOMPER Greenaway, 44 Estcourt Road, Gloucester, GL1 3LG NATALIE BUTTRISS The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP Acknowledgements We would like to thank Johnny Birks, Robbie McDonald, Steven Tapper, Sean Christian and David Bullock for their input and helpful comments and discussion during the preparation of this report. We are also grateful to Paul Bright, Liz Halliwell, Huw Denman, Kenny Kortland, Colin Seddon, Roisin Campbell-Palmer, Peter Lack, Roger Powell, Pete Turner, Catherine O’Reilly, members and staff of the Dutch Mammal Society, Henry Schofield, Hilary Macmillan, Kate McAney, Orly Razgour and Matthieu Lundy for their help and advice. The questionnaire survey in chapter 5 was carried out as part of the People & Pine Martens in Wales project, funded by the Welsh Co-operative to whom we owe thanks. We are grateful to all organisations and individuals who publicised the online survey, including the People’s Trust for Endangered Species, the Federation of City Farms and Community Gardens, The Mammal Society, Denmark Farm, Gwent Wildlife Trust and Brecknock Wildlife Trust, and to all those who took time to complete the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution and Status of the Polecat (Mustela Putorius) in Britain 2014-2015
    The Distribution and Status of the Polecat (Mustela putorius) in Britain 2014-2015 Elizabeth Croose 2016 1 Contents 1 Acknowledgements 3.4.2.4 South-east England 16 3.4.2.5 East of England 17 2 Summary 3.4.2.6 Northern England 17 3.4.3 Scotland 18 3 19 1. Introduction 3.5 Defining ‘Polecat Purity Zones’ 3.5.1 Changes in ‘Polecat Purity Zones’ since the 2004-2006 survey 20 1.1 Introduction to the polecat 3 3.6 Carcass collection 21 1.2 History in Britain 3 1.3 Previous distribution surveys 4 4 22 1.4 Survey aims 4. Discussion 22 5 4.1 Distributional change since the 2004-2006 survey 2. Methods 4.2 Reasons for polecat range expansion 23 2.1 Record collection 5 4.3 Prospects and threats to future recovery 24 2.2 Publicity 5 4.3.1 Prospects for future recovery 24 2.3 Record verification 6 4.3.2 Potential threats to future recovery 24 2.4 Carcass collection 6 4.3.2.1 Trapping mortality 24 4.3.2.2 Secondary rodenticide poisoning 25 7 4.3.2.3 Status of the rabbit population 25 3. Results 4.3.2.4 Hybridisation between polecats and ferrets 25 3.1 Record collection 7 4.4 The status of the polecat elsewhere in Europe 27 3.2 Origins of records 7 4.5 Recommendations for future work 27 3.2.1 Road casualties 8 4.5.1 Monitoring polecats 27 3.2.2 Live sightings 9 4.5.2 Investigating threats to polecats 27 3.2.3 Live trapped 9 4.5.3 Raising awareness and promoting understanding 27 3.2.4 Dead (other) 11 4.5.4 Improving confidence in polecat records 28 3.2.5 Camera trap 11 3.3 Seasonal patterns 12 3.4 Distribution of records 13 28 5.
    [Show full text]
  • (2004) Pine Marten in Nidderdale. Yorks. Nat. Un. Bull. 42: 13
    Changes in the status and distribution of mammals of the order Carnivora in Yorkshire from 1600. County history of the fox, badger, otter, pine marten, stoat, weasel, polecat, American mink, wildcat and domestic cat. Item Type Thesis Authors Howes, Colin Anthony Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 24/09/2021 19:26:55 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/4306 BIBLIOGRAPHY Adams, R. (2004) Pine marten in Nidderdale. Yorks. Nat. Un. Bull. 42: 13. Alcock, I, and Warsop, P. (1982) Diet, distribution and habitat preference of stoats and weasels in Sheffield. Sorby Record 20: 5-10. Anderson-Bledsoe, K.L. and Scanlon, P.E. (1983) Heavy metal concentrations in tissues of Virginia river otters. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 30: 442-447. Andrews, R. (1879) The badger near Pickering. Naturalist 5: 153. Anon. (1880a) Land & Water. Anon. (1880b) Yorkshire Post. Anon. (1881a) The Field, 1.10.1881: 504. Anon. (1881b) Yorkshire Post, 21.6.1881. Anon. (1882a) YNU Circular for Excursion to Grassington 7.8.1882. Anon. (1882b) Yorkshire Post, 23rd May 1882. Anon. (1883) Leeds Express, 24 August 1883. Anon. (1886) Mammals. In YNU Circular 3 for Excursion to Pateley Bridge 17.7.1886. Anon. (1887) The Field, 28 5.1887.
    [Show full text]
  • Syrphidae (Díptera) of Central France
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Volucella - Die Schwebfliegen-Zeitschrift Jahr/Year: 1996 Band/Volume: 2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Speight Martin C. D. Artikel/Article: Syrphidae (Diptera) of Central France 20-35 ©Volucella; Dieter Doczkal (München) und Ulrich Schmid (Stuttgart), download www.zobodat.at 20 VoLUCELLA 2 (1/2), 1996 Syrphidae (Díptera) of Central France Martin C.D. Speight Speight, M.C.D. (1996): Syrphidae (Diptera) of Central France. - Volucella 2 (1/2), 20-35. Stuttgart. Records are presented for 223 species of Syrphidae, derived from the region of France comprising the Départements of Allier, Cher, Cote d ’Or, Indre, Indre-et- Loire, Loir-et-Cher, Loiret, Nièvre, Saône-et-Loire and Yonne. Location of reference specimens is indicated. The ecological balance of this regional fauna is explored, by comparison between the habitat preferences of the species on this list and syrphid lists for North France, Great Britain, Ireland and the Atlantic zone of Europe in general. This shows that, at any location in the Atlantic zone, conversion of deciduous forest to conifer forest can be expected to result in a significant decrease in the diversity of the syrphid fauna. Zusammenfassung Aus den französischen Départments Allier, Cher, Cote d’Or, Indre, Indre-et- Loire, Loir-et-Cher, Loiret, Nièvre, Saône-et-Loire and Yonne werden 223 Arten der Syrphidae gemeldet. Der Verbleib der Belegexemplare ist angegeben. Die ökologi­ sche Bilanz dieser Regionalfauna wird durch Vergleich zwischen den Habitat­ präferenzen der Arten dieser Liste mit Artenlisten fur Nord-Frankreich, Großbritan­ nien, Irland und die atlantische Zone Europas erörtert.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feasibility of Reintroducing Pine Martens to the Forest of Dean And
    The feasibility of reintroducing pine martens ( Martes martes ) to the Forest of Dean and lower Wye Valley May 2018 Authors: Stringer AP 1, MacPherson J2, Carter S2, Gill R 3, Ambrose-Oji B 3, Wilson R 4, Kelsall P 4, Feirn WG, Galbraith LC, Hilário CM, Parry G 1 & Taylor A 1. 1 Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust, Conservation Centre, Robinswood Hill Country Park, Reservoir Road, Gloucester, GL4 6SX. 2 The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire, HR8 1EP. 3 Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey, GU10 4LH. 4 Forestry Commission, Bank House, Bank Street, Coleford, Gloucestershire, GL16 8BA. Acknowledgements : We would like to thank Johnny Birks, Jonathan Spencer, Kevin Stannard, Lauren Harrington, Xavier Lambin, Emma Sheehy, Mike Townsend, Kat Walsh (and staff at Natural England), Henry Schofield, David Priddis, Roger Ransome, Freya Durham, Rob Lambert, Andrew Brook, members of the UK pine marten strategy group, and a number of local stakeholders for their in-depth and interesting discussions and review of the feasibility study. Many thanks to the volunteer group for all their hard work, and in particular to Ali Moss, Alex Blundell, and Nick Martin. The study is indebted to the British Society for Shooting and Conservation, and the National Gamekeepers Organisation, in particular Ian Danby, Sam Walker, and Julian Murray-Evans, for the collaborative survey of their members. We would also like to thank Bianca Ambrose-Oji, Michael Dunn, and Mark Atkinson for their time and effort on the accompanying report “Pine martens in the Forest of Dean: Stakeholder and public attitudes”. We would also like to thank ‘The Dutch National Database Flora and Fauna’ for their help.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Southern Grass Moors Heather
    á 1 Natural Environment Research Council Institute of Terrestrial Ecology INSTITUTE OF TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY LIBRARY SERVICE EDINBURGH LABORATORIES BUSH ESTATE, PENICUIK MIDLOTHIAN EH26 OQB MOORLAND MANAGEMENT: A STUDY OF EXMOOR A report commissioned by the Countryside Commission G R Miller, J Miles Banchory Research Station Hill of Brathens Banchory Kincardineshire and 0 W Heal Merlewood Research Station Grange-over-Sands Cumbria Printed in Great Britain by NERC/SERC Reprographic Services, Swindon C NERC Copyright 1984 Published in 1984 by Institute of Terrestrial Ecology rrUTE OF 68 Hills Road Cambridge CB2 1LA ECOLOGY LAEY ISBN 0 904282 79 1 a\11(1:17. 30 OCT1984 COVER ILLUSTRATION Mosaic map of Exmoor by C B Benefield from photographs by G R Miller and J Miles The Institute of Terrestrial Ecology was (ITE) established in 1973, from the former Nature Conservancy's research stations and staff, joined later by the Institute of Tree Biology and the Culture Centre of Algae and Protozoa. ITE contributes to, and draws upon, the collective knowledge of the 14 sister institutes which make up the Natural Environment Research Council, spanning all the environmental sciences. The Institute studies the factors determining the structure, composition and processes of land and freshwater systems, and of individual plant and animal species. It is developing a sounder scientific basis for predicting and modelling environmental trends arising from natural or man-made change. The results of this research are available to those responsible for the protection, management and wise use of our natural resources. One quarter of ITE's work is research commissioned by customers, such as the Department of Environment, the European Economic Community, the Nature Conservancy Council and the Overseas Development Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Den Sites Used by Pine Martens Martes Martes: a Response to the Scarcity of Arboreal Cavities?
    Blackwell Publishing LtdOxford, UKMAMMammal Review0305-1838Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2005? 2005353&4313320Review ArticleDiversity of pine marten densJ. D. S. Birks, J. E. Messenger and E. C. Halliwell Mammal Rev. 2005, Volume 35, No. 3&4, 313–320. Printed in Singapore. Diversity of den sites used by pine martens Martes martes: a response to the scarcity of arboreal cavities? JOHNNY D. S. BIRKS*, JOHN E. MESSENGER* and ELISABETH C. HALLIWELL† *The Vincent Wildlife Trust, 3 & 4 Bronsil Courtyard, Eastnor, Ledbury, Herefordshire HR8 1EP, UK, †Countryside Council for Wales, Plas Penrhos, Ffordd Penrhos, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2LQ, UK ABSTRACT 1. We compiled a sample of 370 pine marten dens to test the hypothesis that a scarcity of sites leads to the use of suboptimal structures. 2. The sample was influenced by detection methods. Radio-tracking revealed cryptic dens but few natal dens; chance encounters revealed dens in buildings and other man-made structures. A total of 82.8% of natal dens were detected by chance encounters. 3. Most dens were associated with trees (44.3%), rocks (27.6%) and buildings (13.8%). The natal den subsample comprised buildings (44.3%), trees (22.8%), other man-made structures (17.1%) and rocks (14.3%). A total of 69.6% of dens were elevated and typically in structures offering limited shelter. Only 9.8% of all dens were in elevated tree cavities. 4. This diversity of dens reflects a scarcity of arboreal cavities. The alternative structures are suboptimal in terms of energetic costs and risks of predation, and this may limit breeding success in some populations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation of Invertebrates
    (—; C.) N4I_ t MONKS WOOD EXPERIMENTAL STATION EF SYMPOSIUM No. I S9 2(063) March 23rd-25th, 1965 THE CONSERVATION OF INVERTEBRATES THE NATURE CONSERVANCY • I IIIONKB WOOD VAPERIMENTAL STATION. INSTITUTE OF TERREBTNIAL EGOLORT. ABBOTS [UPTON. HUNTINGDON. THE CONSERVATION OF INVERTEBRATES A Symposium held at Monks Wood Experimental Station March 23rd - 25th 1965 Organised by the Conservation Research Section Proceedings edited by Dr. Eric Duffey and Dr. M. G. Morris tIONK8 WOOD WERIMENTAL 8TATION, •INOTITUTE.OF TEORESTD1.11. ECOLOGY, ABBOTO RIPION, HUNTIMIDON. 5q2_(061) SYMPæIUM on the CONSERVATION of INVERTEBRATES C ONTENTS Page Programme and Summary 00 1 List of Participants .. .. .. .. 5 Opening Address - Invertebrate Conservation in relation to the Conservancy's commitments and .the development of its research program:no. E. Duffey .. .. .. .. 00 00 06 00 The Fate of areas of invertebrate intereSt as listed in 1949. J. F. D. Frazer .. .. .. .. .. 16 Extinctions and Invasions - some case histories and conclusions.J. E. Satchell .. .. .. 19 Invertebrate Conservation and Management Plans. E. 29Duffey Status and Conservation of the Large Blue Butterfly, Maculinea arion L. 0. D. Hunt .. 35 The Conservation of Dragonflies in Britain. N. W. Moore45. Basic ecological knowledge required for invertebrate conservation. E. Broadhead .. .. .. 52 Why we need invertebrate surveys. M. G. Morris . 65 Organization and Practice of intensive surveys. W. O. Steel .. .. • .. .. 71 Soma Features of Conservation Interest arising from surveys. A. M. Massee .. .. .. .. .. .. 00 77 The Role of Invertebrate Collections in the Conservancy. T. Huxley .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 83 General Discussion .. 89 á PROGRAMMEand SUIVARY This meetingwas the firststaff symposium to be held at MonksWood and was attendedby 32 representativesfrom neaply ea the regionaloffices inEngland',Wales and Scotland; the Research Stationsand SpecialistBranches.
    [Show full text]
  • American Mink (Mustela Vison) and Its Impact on Native Species in the UK
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk The Plymouth Student Scientist - Volume 01 - 2008 The Plymouth Student Scientist - Volume 1, No. 2 - 2008 2008 American Mink (Mustela vison) and its impact on native species in the UK Rey, A. Rey, A. (2008) 'American Mink (Mustela vison) and its impact on native species in the UK', The Plymouth Student Scientist, 1(2), pp. 302-314. http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/13817 The Plymouth Student Scientist University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. The Plymouth Student Scientist, 2008, 1, (2), 302-314 American Mink (Mustela vison) and its impact on native species in the UK Alex W. Rey 2008 Project Advisor: Stephen Burchett, School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA Abstract Introduced alien species are recognised to be a major threat to native biodiversity. The American mink (Mustela vison) is a highly adaptable, naturalised predator in the UK, introduced as part of the fur trade in the 1920‟s. The species became established in the wild in the 1950‟s through purposeful releases and escapes and since establishing the mink has been held accountable for the decline of many native species, most notably the water vole (Arvicola terrestris).
    [Show full text]
  • Great Britain
    Great Britain This article is about the island. For the state of which 1.1 Toponymy it is part, see United Kingdom. For the historical state, see Kingdom of Great Britain. For other uses, see Great Britain (disambiguation) and Britain (disambiguation). Main article: Britain (place name) Great Britain, also known as Britain, is a large island The archipelago has been referred to by a single name in the north Atlantic Ocean off the northwest coast of for over 2000 years: the term 'British Isles' derives from continental Europe. With an area of 209,331 km2 terms used by classical geographers to describe this is- (80,823 sq mi), Great Britain is the largest of the British land group. By 50 BC Greek geographers were using equivalents of Prettanikē as a collective name for the Isles, the largest European island, and the ninth-largest [11] island in the world.[5][note 1] In 2011 the island had a pop- British Isles. However, with the Roman conquest of ulation of about 61 million people, making it the world’s Britain the Latin term Britannia was used for the island of Great Britain, and later Roman-occupied Britain south third-most populous island after Java in Indonesia and [12][13][14] Honshu in Japan.[7][8] The island of Ireland is situated to of Caledonia. the west of it, and together these islands, along with over The earliest known name for Great Britain is Albion 1,000 smaller surrounding islands, comprise the British (Greek: Ἀλβίων) or insula Albionum, from either the Isles archipelago.[9] Latin albus meaning “white” (referring to the white The island is dominated by a maritime climate with quite cliffs of Dover, the first view of Britain from the con- narrow temperature differences between seasons.
    [Show full text]