Italian Theory and Criticism 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Italian Theory and Criticism 2 Italian Theory and Criticism 2. Twentieth Century The history of Italian literary theory and criticism in the twentieth century can be written, for the pre-World War II period especially, as a series of attempts to grasp and develop, or to critique and overcome, the thought and influence of Benedetto Croce (1866-1952). Although he hated and seldom used the word, the "structure" of Croce's immanent Spirit gave it impressive range and legitimizing power. In a way, it can be said that he adapted G. W. F. Hegel to Immanuel Kant: stop the Absolute Spirit from its spiraling through history and rest it on a fixed, "olympic" architecture, balancing it atop four basic categories, namely, the aesthetic, the logical, the economic and ethical, and the historical. This also permitted the adaptation of a dualist scheme: art and philosophy were the idealized, pure disciplines of which the economic, the pragmatic, the lived everydayness that go into the making of history were but the concrete aspect and evidence. Croce's fundamental aesthetic principles can be summarized as follows: art is an autonomous spiritual category; it falls under the sphere of theory; it is constituted by images and intuitions uncontaminated by intellectual, moral, practical, or material concerns. In other words, art does not distinguish, is not analytical, and cannot be philosophical, being pure fantasy. In the work of art, intuition and expression coincide. But this does not mean that Croce's aesthetic was irreducibly abstract, for as an erudite historian he placed great importance on concrete philological research and documentation, and he was a thoroughly militant critic. The polemic over verism, which held that art had to attain a maximum level of impersonality, reaching a sort of perfect mimesis with the unfolding of everyday reality, compelled Croce to consider whether, on the contrary, it was art that was necessarily personal, unique, the expression of one single individual's emotion or vision, and as such in tune with a representation of a pure form or spirit. In this view, naturalistic and realistic writing tend to lose aesthetic power and consistency, and it is lyric poetry that is enthroned as queen of the arts, Euterpe replacing Calliope. Croce studied most intensively the seventeenth and nineteenth centuries, times during which the arts both raised the tension of individual expression and self-assertiveness and also introduced a more psychological time scale. During these centuries we see the emergence of subjectivity as it attempts to be more scientific and secular. But the Grund is: there is one unrepeatable human life, with its own specific, unique voice. In the Logic (1909) Croce gives a fuller exposition of his epistemology: thought and knowledge can in fact be linked, but the "method" of reasoning, the discourse of interpretation, proceeds by artfully written syllogisms. Philosophy explains art, phenomena, indeed reality itself, by using concepts that can be organized according to the laws of induction and deduction. Yet philosophy is not reality. In the later, more readable version of 1912, the Breviario di estetica, Croce reiterates that art is an a priori synthesis of feeling (sentimento) and intuition that has turned into a full, complete representation. From this brief sketch of the premises, we expect several corollaries to follow. There is no "content" to look for in an artwork. Art expresses the sentiments of its author. Poets cannot be compared, as each is unique. Translation is impossible; it is only a pedagogical necessity. The responsibility of the interpreter is to capture "the mood or state of being (stato d'animo) of its author." Finally, since all arts aspire to the purity of the lyrical, understood as the vox anima, the question arises whether it is at all possible to write literary history or a history of literature, for in the background Clio demands to be heard. The problem is the following: if we try to write a literary history, we are doing no more than tracing a map that is fundamentally conceptual, a philosophical enterprise, and we would be treating individual works of art as if they were laboratory objects or logical constructs. This has no bearing on aesthetics, for it is a logical problem; in principle we should not even call it literary history, but the philosophy of art, as the aesthetic category is one and universal. As a result, Croce would only write "monographs." But history, as it turns out, is of the four probably the most problematic cornerstone in Croce's edifice of Spirit. In Croce's thought and in that of three generations of scholars, critics, and historians, the notion and understanding of history certainly underwent the greatest amount of development, in a sense forcing Croce to make occasional modifications to his aesthetic in order to be coherent. It must be remembered that the aristocratic, secular liberalism that underlies his thought was badly shaken by World War I, then a decade later again by the rise of fascism. In the early stages, history was identified with aesthetics, insofar as what can represent a concrete individual person is a pure form. In this conception, not only distinctions such as those between what is real and what is not are illogical; time and space themselves are thought to be incidental, contingent: they are "ingredients" of Spirit, Croce argued, and not "ordering" principles. There can be no history of the expressions of Spirit, because history is spirit in the making. By the 1920s Croce's absolute idealism identified history with the philosophy of history. In the 1930s this was further elaborated into an even broader ontology wherein historicism became the truth of humanism, serving as the foundation of culture, legitimizing its claim to being human, and, finally, motivating the claim that history is the need of and search for freedom. But the fundamental separation between the two categories, between that of art or the aesthetic and that of thought or the logical (or scientific), remained. It could only be bridged by a third faculty, that of judgment. To even begin to think about what history is one must acknowledge the necessity of linking spirit to individual, or as Croce states in the first paragraph of the 1902 Aesthetics, fantasy and intellect, the individual object with the universal one, the single things and the relations among them. As a result, in evaluating a work of art we undertake two separate and yet interconnected pursuits: we reconstruct the personality of the author, and we characterize the "moment" in which the work happened in terms of whether it achieved the a priori synthesis of intuition and expression. Insofar as art is a special event, and the expression of human genius, we do a critique of taste. The fact that the earlier, pivotal notion of art as individual lyrical expression was later altered to become art as cosmic expression only proves that history was to become the necessary common ground to both art and philosophy. In the later stages of Croce's thought, in short, the poem expresses no longer solely an individual contingent reality but an entire universe. According to Mario Puppo (La critica letteraria del novecento, 1985), the monographic conception of history is not the exasperated manifestation of an individualistic notion of the work of art, celebrating the author as model or authority against some hierarchy, but rather, and almost to the contrary, historiographical research focused on the work itself, on its unity and uniqueness. Critical judgment for Croce is, at one and the same time, philosophical (because it seeks to establish an intellectual mediation), aesthetic (because it speaks to the values of the work), and historical (because it is the locus where the two coincide). And yet, owing to his conception of spirit, Croce ultimately believed that there was no substantial difference between the critic and the artist, for what obtains at most is a distinction of degree, not of originality and authenticity. One may overhear here echoes of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and even Oscar Wilde, as well as an uncanny hermeneutic predisposition. Through his journal La Critica, begun in 1903, and subsequently through the industrious editorship of authors from abroad as well as from less-traveled corners of the Italian cultural grid, Croce intervened in all sectors of critical and theoretical discourse. Marxism and sociology were banned early on from any aesthetic and literary evaluation, so much so that there later developed a sort of "leftist idealism" or "idealistic materialism." This can be perceived already in Antonio Gramsci and will be variously developed in the work of literary historians such as Natalino Sapegno (whose "comment" to The Divine Comedy has been studied in Italian high schools for over 40 years) and, since the 1960s, Giuseppe Petronio. Idealist-historicist principles underlie also the crucial and influential work of the Indo- European linguist Giacomo Devoto, whose criticism did have the advantage of focusing on the parole, although the background assumption concerning the langue was that it consisted of four aspects, the literary or controlled, the habitual, the expressive, and the technical (Studi di stilistica, 1950). This reproduces Croce's later scheme in La poesia (1936), wherein artistic expression is said to be--or is interpretable according to the categories--sentimental or immediate, poetic, prosastic, and oratorical. Devoto's criticism and linguistics pulled more toward Karl Vossler and Leo Spitzer, very important interlocutors on the Italian scene, than toward Ferdinand de Saussure, for whose influence we must wait until the 1950s. On the same horizon we find the stylistic contributions of Cesare De Lollis and, later, Aldo Schiaffini. These critics adapted the Crocean paradigm to account for aspects that had been left undetermined and therefore dangling.
Recommended publications
  • “ROUSSEAU Y MARX” De Galvano Della Volpe
    Galvano della Volpe ROUSSEAU Y MARX 2 ROUSSEAU Y MARX Libro 129 3 Galvano della Volpe Colección SOCIALISMO y LIBERTAD Libro 1 LA REVOLUCIÓN ALEMANA Víctor Serge - Karl Liebknecht - Rosa Luxemburgo Libro 2 DIALÉCTICA DE LO CONCRETO Karel Kosik Libro 3 LAS IZQUIERDAS EN EL PROCESO POLÍTICO ARGENTINO Silvio Frondizi Libro 4 INTRODUCCIÓN A LA FILOSOFÍA DE LA PRAXIS Antonio Gramsci Libro 5 MAO Tse-tung José Aricó Libro 6 VENCEREMOS Ernesto Guevara Libro 7 DE LO ABSTRACTO A LO CONCRETO - DIALÉCTICA DE LO IDEAL Edwald Ilienkov Libro 8 LA DIALÉCTICA COMO ARMA, MÉTODO, CONCEPCIÓN y ARTE Iñaki Gil de San Vicente Libro 9 GUEVARISMO: UN MARXISMO BOLIVARIANO Néstor Kohan Libro 10 AMÉRICA NUESTRA. AMÉRICA MADRE Julio Antonio Mella Libro 11 FLN. Dos meses con los patriotas de Vietnam del sur Madeleine Riffaud Libro 12 MARX y ENGELS. Nueve conferencias en la Academia Socialista David Riazánov Libro 13 ANARQUISMO y COMUNISMO Evgueni Preobrazhenski Libro 14 REFORMA o REVOLUCIÓN - LA CRISIS DE LA SOCIALDEMOCRACIA Rosa Luxemburgo Libro 15 ÉTICA y REVOLUCIÓN Herbert Marcuse Libro 16 EDUCACIÓN y LUCHA DE CLASES Aníbal Ponce Libro 17 LA MONTAÑA ES ALGO MÁS QUE UNA INMENSA ESTEPA VERDE Omar Cabezas Libro 18 LA REVOLUCIÓN EN FRANCIA. Breve historia del movimiento obrero en Francia 1789-1848. Selección de textos de Alberto J. Plá Libro 19 MARX y ENGELS Karl Marx y Fiedrich Engels. Selección de textos Libro 20 CLASES y PUEBLOS. Sobre el sujeto revolucionario Iñaki Gil de San Vicente Libro 21 LA FILOSOFÍA BURGUESA POSTCLÁSICA Rubén Zardoya 4 ROUSSEAU Y MARX Libro 22 DIALÉCTICA Y CONSCIENCIA DE CLASE György Lukács Libro 23 EL MATERIALISMO HISTÓRICO ALEMÁN Franz Mehring Libro 24 DIALÉCTICA PARA LA INDEPENDENCIA Ruy Mauro Marini Libro 25 MUJERES EN REVOLUCIÓN Clara Zetkin Libro 26 EL SOCIALISMO COMO EJERCICIO DE LA LIBERTAD Agustín Cueva - Daniel Bensaïd.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Emotions Is Elsa Morante, Goliarda Sapienza and Elena
    NARRATING INTENSITY: HISTORY AND EMOTIONS IN ELSA MORANTE, GOLIARDA SAPIENZA AND ELENA FERRANTE by STEFANIA PORCELLI A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Comparative Literature in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2020 © 2020 STEFANIA PORCELLI All Rights Reserved ii Narrating Intensity: History and Emotions in Elsa Morante, Goliarda Sapienza and Elena Ferrante by Stefania Porcell i This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Comparative Literature in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________ ______________________________ Date [Giancarlo Lombardi] Chair of Examining Committee ________ ______________________________ Date [Giancarlo Lombardi] Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Monica Calabritto Hermann Haller Nancy Miller THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Narrating Intensity: History and Emotions in Elsa Morante, Goliarda Sapienza and Elena Ferrante By Stefania Porcelli Advisor: Giancarlo Lombardi L’amica geniale (My Brilliant Friend) by Elena Ferrante (published in Italy in four volumes between 2011 and 2014 and translated into English between 2012 and 2015) has galvanized critics and readers worldwide to the extent that it is has been adapted for television by RAI and HBO. It has been deemed “ferocious,” “a death-defying linguistic tightrope act,” and a combination of “dark and spiky emotions” in reviews appearing in popular newspapers. Taking the considerable critical investment in the affective dimension of Ferrante’s work as a point of departure, my dissertation examines the representation of emotions in My Brilliant Friend and in two Italian novels written between the 1960s and the 1970s – La Storia (1974, History: A Novel) by Elsa Morante (1912-1985) and L’arte della gioia (The Art of Joy, 1998/2008) by Goliarda Sapienza (1924-1996).
    [Show full text]
  • A British Reflection: the Relationship Between Dante's Comedy and The
    A British Reflection: the Relationship between Dante’s Comedy and the Italian Fascist Movement and Regime during the 1920s and 1930s with references to the Risorgimento. Keon Esky A thesis submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. University of Sydney 2016 KEON ESKY Fig. 1 Raffaello Sanzio, ‘La Disputa’ (detail) 1510-11, Fresco - Stanza della Segnatura, Palazzi Pontifici, Vatican. KEON ESKY ii I dedicate this thesis to my late father who would have wanted me to embark on such a journey, and to my partner who with patience and love has never stopped believing that I could do it. KEON ESKY iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis owes a debt of gratitude to many people in many different countries, and indeed continents. They have all contributed in various measures to the completion of this endeavour. However, this study is deeply indebted first and foremost to my supervisor Dr. Francesco Borghesi. Without his assistance throughout these many years, this thesis would not have been possible. For his support, patience, motivation, and vast knowledge I shall be forever thankful. He truly was my Virgil. Besides my supervisor, I would like to thank the whole Department of Italian Studies at the University of Sydney, who have patiently worked with me and assisted me when I needed it. My sincere thanks go to Dr. Rubino and the rest of the committees that in the years have formed the panel for the Annual Reviews for their insightful comments and encouragement, but equally for their firm questioning, which helped me widening the scope of my research and accept other perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxist Logic and Modern Sciences
    Galileo Galilei Alvin Goldman Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling Georg Wilhelm FriedrichLouis Hegel AlthusserMario Rossi Pierre Naville Lodovico Geymonat Friedrich Engels Maurice Godelier Galvano Della Volpe Herbert Marcuse Aristotle György Lukács Immanuel KantFrancis Bacon Warren Sturgis McCulloch Max Wertheimer Leon Trotsky Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Marxist Logic and Modern SciencesRoger Garaudy Bertrand Russell François Jacob Paul Fraisse Karl Marx George Novack Friedrich Adolf Trandelenburg Jean-PaulRobert Harding Sartre Whitaker Evert Willem BethHenri Lefebvre John Dewey Johann Gottlieb Fichte Plato René Descartes Nahuel Moreno Nicolas Bourbaki Ludwig Feuerbach Henri BergsonClaude Lévi StraussJean Piaget CEHuS Centro de Estudios Humanos y Sociales Nahuel Moreno Marxist Logic and Modern Sciences This work was first published as a preface to the Spanish edition of the book Introduction to the Logic of Marxism by George Novack, Editorial Pluma, Buenos Aires, 1973 English translation: Daniel Iglesias Cover and interior design: Daniel Iglesias www.nahuelmoreno.org www.uit-ci.org www.izquierdasocialista.org.ar Copyright by CEHuS , Centro de Estudios Humanos y Sociales Buenos Aires, 2018 [email protected] CEHuS Centro de Estudios Humanos y Sociales Index Marxist Logic and Modern Sciences Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................1 Chapter I Piaget’s epistemology ........................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Biografia Di Alberto Moravia
    NonSoloBiografie - Tutte le biografie nel web... NonSoloBiografie: Alberto Moravia Alberto Moravia (per l'anagrafe Alberto Pincherle: il cognome Moravia è quello della nonna paterna) nasce il 28 novembre 1907 a Roma, in via Sgambati, da un'agiata famiglia borghese. Il padre, Carlo Pincherle Moravia, architetto e pittore, è di origine veneziana, mentre la madre, Gina de Marsanich, è di Ancona. Terzo di quattro figli (Adriana, Elena e Gastone, nato nel 1914), Alberto ha una «prima infanzia normale benché solitaria». All'età di nove anni si verifica «il fatto più importante della sua vita», quello che l'autore stesso riteneva avesse inciso «sulla sua sensibilità in maniera determinante»: la malattia da cui non guarirà del tutto che verso i diciassette anni, lasciandolo leggermente claudicante. All'età di nove anni, infatti, Alberto si ammala di tubercolosi ossea, malattia dagli atroci dolori che lo costringe a letto per cinque anni: i primi tre a casa, e gli ultimi due nel sanatorio Codivilla di Cortina d'Ampezzo. Durante questo periodo i suoi studi (interrotti alla licenza ginnasiale, suo unico titolo di studio) sono irregolari. Tuttavia, legge innumerevoli libri, soprattutto i classici e i massimi narratori dell'Ottocento e del primo Novecento (Dostoevskij, Joyce, Goldoni, Shakespeare, Molière, Mallarmé, Leopardi e molti altri); scrive versi in francese e in italiano, e studia tedesco. Dopo aver lasciato il sanatorio nell'autunno del 1925, durante la convalescenza a Bressanone, in provincia di Bolzano, dà inizio alla stesura de Gli indifferenti, che verrà pubblicato con gran successo nel 1929. La sua salute rimane fragile ed è costretto a vivere in alberghi di montagna passando da un luogo all'altro.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Alberto Carocci (1926-1939)
    Habitus and embeddedness in the Florentine literary field: the case of Alberto Carocci (1926-1939) Article Accepted Version La Penna, D. (2018) Habitus and embeddedness in the Florentine literary field: the case of Alberto Carocci (1926- 1939). Italian Studies, 73 (2). pp. 126-141. ISSN 1748-6181 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00751634.2018.1444536 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/75567/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00751634.2018.1444536 Publisher: Taylor and Francis All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Habitus and Embeddedness in the Florentine Literary Field: The Case of Alberto Carocci (1926-1939) Daniela La Penna Department of Modern Languages and European Studies, University of Reading, Reading, UK [email protected] 1 Habitus and Embeddedness in the Florentine Literary Field: The Case of Alberto Carocci (1926-1939) This article intends to show how the notion of embeddedness, a concept derived from network theory, can improve our understanding of how a journal’s reliance on regional and national intellectual networks impacts the journal’s performance. The study takes as test case Alberto Carocci’s editorship of Solaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlo Dionisotti 1908–1998
    CARLO DIONISOTTI Copyright © The British Academy 2001 – all rights reserved Carlo Dionisotti 1908–1998 I CARLO DIONISOTTI, Professor of Italian at the University of London 1949–70 and a Fellow of the British Academy from 1972, is commonly considered the greatest Italian literary historian of his age. He had unrivalled expertise in fifteenth- and sixteenth-century Italian literature, and a passionate interest in questions of Italian culture to which was added in his later years a particular insight into the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. II He was born on 9 June 1908 in Turin into a prosperous family.1 His father, Eugenio (1866–1955), a graduate in law, was also Turinese. His paternal grandfather, Carlo (1824–1899), a magistrate and a historian, born in the nearby town of Vercelli, had studied and lived in Turin. Dionisotti, who was his namesake, was to mention with respect and affection the work of this grandfather.2 His mother, Carla Cattaneo (1886–1973), was a Swiss 1 The surname ‘Casalone’ which followed his own in his first publications is that of a family friend who wished his own name to survive, in association to that of Dionisotti. 2 Carlo Dionisotti, Appunti sui moderni. Foscolo, Leopardi, Manzoni e altri (Bologna, il Mulino, 1988), 388–91. He also wrote a preface to to the reprint of a book of his grandfather (originally Proceedings of the British Academy, 111, 481–96. © The British Academy 2001. Copyright © The British Academy 2001 – all rights reserved 482 Giulio Lepschy national, born and bred in Italy. Dionisotti always felt a particular bond of affection with Italian-speaking Switzerland3 and was to be a frequent visitor at Bigorio, outside Bellinzona, for the seminars regularly organ- ised there by Swiss Italianists.
    [Show full text]
  • Fondazione Centro Di Studi Storico-Letterari Natalino Sapegno
    SAGGI E RICERCHE 3 Fondazione Centro di studi storico-letterari Natalino Sapegno pozzi5.indd 1 21/11/14 19.25 pozzi5.indd 2 21/11/14 19.25 AI CONFINI DELLA LETTERATURA Atti della giornata in onore di Mario Pozzi Morgex, 4 maggio 2012 a cura di Jean-Louis Fournel, Rosanna Gorris Camos ed Enrico Mattioda Nino Aragno Editore pozzi5.indd 3 21/11/14 19.25 Pubblicazione della Fondazione “Centro di studi storico-letterari Natalino Sapegno - onlus” © 2014 Nino Aragno Editore sede legale via San Francesco d’Assisi, 22/bis – 10121 Torino sedi operative via San Calimero, 11 – 20122 Milano strada Santa Rosalia, 9 – 12038 Savigliano ufficio stampa tel. 02.72094703 – 02.34592395 e-mail: [email protected] sito internet: www.ninoaragnoeditore.it pozzi5.indd 4 21/11/14 19.25 INDICE Premessa vii Jean-Louis Fournel, Questione della lingua e lingue degli stati: lingua dell’impero, lingua dello stato e lingua imperiale 3 Elena Panciera, Il Bembo di Speroni. Una lettura dell’Orazione in morte del cardinale Pietro Bembo 19 Rosanna Gorris Camos, «Ho la barca alla riva»: l’Arrenopia o l’entre-deux, con una lettera inedita del Giraldi Cinthio 45 Carlo Vecce, In margine alla prima lettera di Andrea Corsali (Leonardo in India) 69 Valentina Martino, Per uno studio dell’Accademia Fiorentina. Gli Annali dell’Accademia degli Umidi, poi Fiorentina: il manoscritto B III 52 della Biblioteca Marucelliana di Firenze 85 Enrico Mattioda, Vasari in prosa e in poesia 107 Romain Descendre, Usages de l’argument empirique au début du XVI e siècle: «l’expérience» aux confins de la littérature 123 Noémie Castagné, Galileo inventore della prosa scientifica italiana? 137 Jean-Claude Zancarini, HyperMachiavel.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY of JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU the Impossibilityof Reason
    qvortrup.cov 2/9/03 12:29 pm Page 1 Was Rousseau – the great theorist of the French Revolution – really a Conservative? THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU This original study argues that the author of The Social Contract was a constitutionalist much closer to Madison, Montesquieu and Locke than to revolutionaries. Outlining his profound opposition to Godless materialism and revolutionary change, this book finds parallels between Rousseau and Burke, as well as showing that Rousseau developed the first modern theory of nationalism. The book presents an inte- grated political analysis of Rousseau’s educational, ethical, religious and political writings. The book will be essential readings for students of politics, philosophy and the history of ideas. ‘No society can survive without mutuality. Dr Qvortrup’s book shows that rights and responsibilities go hand in hand. It is an excellent primer for any- one wishing to understand how renewal of democracy hinges on a strong civil society’ The Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, MP ‘Rousseau has often been singled out as a precursor of totalitarian thought. Dr Qvortrup argues persuasively that Rousseau was nothing of the sort. Through an array of chapters the book gives an insightful account of Rousseau’s contribution to modern philosophy, and how he inspired individuals as diverse as Mozart, Tolstoi, Goethe, and Kant’ John Grey, Professor of European Political Thought,LSE ‘Qvortrup has written a highly readable and original book on Rousseau. He approaches the subject of Rousseau’s social and political philosophy with an attractively broad vision of Rousseau’s thought in the context of the development of modernity, including our contemporary concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Maria Truglio
    MARIA TRUGLIO Department of Spanish, Italian and Portuguese, Pennsylvania State University 152 Burrowes Building, University Park, PA 16802 Tel: (814) 865-1155; Fax: (814) 863-7944; E-mail: [email protected] http://sip.la.psu.edu/directory/mxt34 _______________________________________________________________________ DEGREES Doctor of Philosophy in Italian Language and Literature. Yale University, 2001. Dissertation: “Beyond the Family Romance: The Uncanny Poetry of Giovanni Pascoli.” Adviser: Professor Paolo Valesio. Master of Arts in Italian Language and Literature. Yale University, 1996. Bachelor of Arts in Italian Studies and English. Wesleyan University, 1992. High Honors in English; Phi Beta Kappa, 1990. EMPLOYMENT ACADEMIC Professor of Italian and Women’s, Gender, and Sexulaity Studies. Department of Spanish, Italian and Portuguese Pennsylvania State University (University Park). 2019-present Associate Professor of Italian and Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies. Department of Spanish, Italian and Portuguese. Pennsylvania State University (University Park). 2009-2019 Assistant Professor of Italian. Department of Spanish, Italian and Portuguese. Pennsylvania State University. 2003-2009 Lecturer in Italian. Department of Spanish, Italian and Portuguese. Pennsylvania State University. 2001- 2003 ADMINISTRATIVE Co-Organizer, Spanish and Italian Modernist Studies Forum. Pennsylvania State University (University Park). 2012-2020 Interim Head, Department of Spanish, Italian and Portuguese. Pennsylvania State University (University Park).
    [Show full text]
  • Bontempelli E Buzzati. Forme Del Realismo Magico
    Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Filologia e Letteratura Italiana Tesi di Laurea Bontempelli e Buzzati. Forme del Realismo Magico Relatore Prof. Alberto Zava Correlatori Prof.ssa Ricciarda Ricorda Prof. Alessandro Scarsella Laureanda Gaia Milocco Matricola 844167 1 Anno Accademico 2019/2020 INDICE INTRODUZIONE 4 CAPITOLO PRIMO IL REALISMO MAGICO 6 I.1. La teoria generale del Realismo Magico e il suo legame con la Metafisica 6 I.2. Il Realismo Magico e il Surrealismo 17 I.3. Il Realismo Magico e l’Italia Magica 29 CAPITOLO SECONDO IL REALISMO MAGICO NEL ROMANZO ITALIANO: BONTEMPELLI, BUZZATI E LA NARRATIVA FANTASTICA 42 II.1. Le forme del fantastico nell’opera di Bontempelli (1922-1940): La scacchiera davanti allo specchio, Eva Ultima, La donna dei miei sogni 42 II.2. L’eredità di Bontempelli nell’opera di Buzzati: Il segreto del Bosco Vecchio (1935) 65 II.3. La tradizione tedesca del fantastico nel Realismo Magico di seconda specie: l’eredità di E.T.A. Hoffmann nella scrittura di Buzzati 76 CAPITOLO TERZO IL REALISMO MAGICO E LA FANTASCIENZA: FIGURE DI AUTOMI 85 2 III.1. Il grande ritratto (1960) di Buzzati: il riuso dei moduli bontempelliani e il rovesciamento delle istanze metafisiche 85 CONCLUSIONI 98 BIBLIOGRAFIA 100 BIBLIOGRAFIA GENERALE 101 BIBLIOGRAFIA CRITICA SU MASSIMO BONTEMPELLI E SU DINO BUZZATI 104 OPERE PRESE IN ESAME 106 3 INTRODUZIONE Seguendo lo spunto del brillante saggio Metafora e sogno: la narrativa di Buzzati fra «Italia magica» e «Surrealismo italiano»1 di Alvaro Biondi (in cui l’autore, con un’attenta indagine di storiografia letteraria, tratteggia la differenza tra il Surrealismo italiano di derivazione francese e la produzione magico-realista inscritta nel frame temporale che va, all’incirca, dal 1935 al 1945), si approfondiranno – mediante gli strumenti della Teoria della Letteratura – le due principali declinazioni italiane del Realismo Magico, che confluiscono rispettivamente nelle figure paradigmatiche di Massimo Bontempelli e di Dino Buzzati.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism
    Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism BIDET2_f1_i-xv.indd i 10/25/2007 8:05:05 PM Historical Materialism Book Series Editorial Board Paul Blackledge, Leeds – Sébastien Budgen, Paris Michael Krätke, Amsterdam – Stathis Kouvelakis, London – Marcel van der Linden, Amsterdam China Miéville, London – Paul Reynolds, Lancashire Peter Thomas, Amsterdam VOLUME 16 BIDET2_f1_i-xv.indd ii 10/25/2007 8:05:05 PM Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism Edited by Jacques Bidet and Stathis Kouvelakis LEIDEN • BOSTON 2008 BIDET2_f1_i-xv.indd iii 10/25/2007 8:05:05 PM This book is an English translation of Jacques Bidet and Eustache Kouvelakis, Dic- tionnaire Marx contemporain. C. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris 2001. Ouvrage publié avec le concours du Ministère français chargé de la culture – Centre national du Livre. This book has been published with financial aid of CNL (Centre National du Livre), France. This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Translations by Gregory Elliott. ISSN 1570-1522 ISBN 978 90 04 14598 6 Copyright 2008 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]