English As a Global Language Second Edition
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Linguistics 101 African American English AAE - Basics
Linguistics 101 African American English AAE - Basics • AAE = AAVE (African American Vernacular English) • AAE is a dialect continuum • ranges from Standard American English spoken with a AAE accent to the Gullah creole like that spoken off the coast of Georgia. • AAE is neither spoken by all African Americans, nor is it spoken by only African Americans. • Most speakers of AAE are bidialectal. AAE - Basics • Why focus on AAE? 1. Case study for the relation between a society and language. 2. Many misconceptions exist, more so than with other dialects. AAE - Misconceptions • Common misconceptions: • AAE is just slang • AAE is bad English • AAE is illogical • ... • There is no scientific basis for the above misconception. • Like Standard American English (SAE), AAE has: • a grammar • a lexicon • social rules of use AAE - Misconceptions • Reasons for misconceptions • confusing ‘prestige’ with ‘correctness’ • lack of linguistic background, understanding of languages and dialects • perception of group using language variety • perception of various races, ethnicities, religions • perception of people from various regions • perception of people of various socioeconomic statuses • etc. Characteristics of AAE AAE - Characteristics • AAE differs systematically from Mainstream American English (MAE). • Characteristics of AAE which differ from MAE regularly occur in other dialects/languages. • Not all varieties of AAE exhibit all of the aspects discussed below. • Only characteristics of AAE which differ from MAE are presented below. AAE - Phonology • R-Deletion • /ɹ/ is deleted unless before a vowel • e.g. ‘sore’ = ‘saw’; ‘poor’ = ‘Poe’ • also common in New York, Boston, England • L-Deletion • e.g. ‘toll’ = ‘toe’, ‘all’ = ‘awe’ • also happens in Delaware! • ‘folder’ => ‘foder’ AAE - Phonology • Consonant cluster reduction • e.g. -
Simplified Technical English Language
When one size does not fit all, we customise training to meet your needs. Simplified Technical English On-site STE Training Post-training Support Frequently Asked Online STE Training Getting Started Questions All Rights Reserved. Copyright © Shufrans TechDocs Training On - site On-site ASD-STE100 training workshop This training workshop offers the most tailored type of training designed to meet your exact needs. Our trainers will deliver STE training at your preferred on-site location. With Shufrans’ Training customised training workshop, there will be plenty of opportunities to ask questions, seek Online clarification and receive personalised STE coaching. 1. Training overview • 2 to 3 days of highly personalised and extensive classroom training, followed by Post workshop-style interaction Support - • Recommended class size: 5 – 15 participants training • This course is designed to meet your company’s specific requirements. Our STE trainer will also address some of the commonly encountered questions when technical authors begin writing in STE: How to implement STE while complying with your industry’s regulations? o Started Getting o Using STE to meet your project deliverables and long-term business goals o How to optimise technical documentation workflow to fully benefit from STE? o Which STE checker software suits you best? • Practical discussions and activities based on your own content and documentation FAQ All Rights Reserved. Copyright © Shufrans TechDocs Training On - site o Rewriting workshop sessions let participants convert existing text to Simplified Technical English. o Participants can compare, analyse, and discuss suitable technical writing solutions to reinforce learning. Training Online o All sessions are moderated by an expert STE trainer. -
Origins of NZ English
Origins of NZ English There are three basic theories about the origins of New Zealand English, each with minor variants. Although they are usually presented as alternative theories, they are not necessarily incompatible. The theories are: • New Zealand English is a version of 19th century Cockney (lower-class London) speech; • New Zealand English is a version of Australian English; • New Zealand English developed independently from all other varieties from the mixture of accents and dialects that the Anglophone settlers in New Zealand brought with them. New Zealand as Cockney The idea that New Zealand English is Cockney English derives from the perceptions of English people. People not themselves from London hear some of the same pronunciations in New Zealand that they hear from lower-class Londoners. In particular, some of the vowel sounds are similar. So the vowel sound in a word like pat in both lower-class London English and in New Zealand English makes that word sound like pet to other English people. There is a joke in England that sex is what Londoners get their coal in. That is, the London pronunciation of sacks sounds like sex to other English people. The same joke would work with New Zealanders (and also with South Africans and with Australians, until very recently). Similarly, English people from outside London perceive both the London and the New Zealand versions of the word tie to be like their toy. But while there are undoubted similarities between lower-class London English and New Zealand (and South African and Australian) varieties of English, they are by no means identical. -
Not Taking Yourself Too Seriously in Australian English: Semantic Explications, Cultural Scripts, Corpus Evidence
Not taking yourself too seriously in Australian English: Semantic explications, cultural scripts, corpus evidence Author Goddard, Cliff Published 2009 Journal Title Intercultural Pragmatics Version Version of Record (VoR) DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2009.002 Copyright Statement © 2009 Walter de Gruyter & Co. KG Publishers. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/44428 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Not taking yourself too seriously in Australian English: Semantic explications, cultural scripts, corpus evidence CLIFF GODDARD Abstract In the mainstream speech culture of Australia (as in the UK, though per- haps more so in Australia), taking yourself too seriously is culturally proscribed. This study applies the techniques of Natural Semantic Meta- language (NSM) semantics and ethnopragmatics (Goddard 2006b, 2008; Wierzbicka 1996, 2003, 2006a) to this aspect of Australian English speech culture. It first develops a semantic explication for the language-specific ex- pression taking yourself too seriously, thus helping to give access to an ‘‘in- sider perspective’’ on the practice. Next, it seeks to identify some of the broader communicative norms and social attitudes that are involved, using the method of cultural scripts (Goddard and Wierzbicka 2004). Finally, it investigates the extent to which predictions generated from the analysis can be supported or disconfirmed by contrastive analysis of Australian English corpora as against other English corpora, and by the use of the Google search engine to explore di¤erent subdomains of the World Wide Web. -
Natural Phonetic Tendencies and Social Meaning: Exploring the Allophonic Raising Split of PRICE and MOUTH on the Isles of Scilly
This is a repository copy of Natural phonetic tendencies and social meaning: Exploring the allophonic raising split of PRICE and MOUTH on the Isles of Scilly. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/133952/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Moore, E.F. and Carter, P. (2018) Natural phonetic tendencies and social meaning: Exploring the allophonic raising split of PRICE and MOUTH on the Isles of Scilly. Language Variation and Change, 30 (3). pp. 337-360. ISSN 0954-3945 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394518000157 This article has been published in a revised form in Language Variation and Change [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394518000157]. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Cambridge University Press. Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Title: Natural phonetic tendencies -
The Loyalist Origins of Canada's Identity Crisis
Condemned to Rootlessness: The Loyalist Origins of Canada's Identity Crisis Introduction In the view of the English-speaking Canadian media, Canada has an identity crisis, a situation attributable to divisions within the Canadian body politic that are regularly expressed in constitutional bickering between Quebec and the Rest of Canada and between the provinces and the federal government.1 Yet the identity crisis in the lifeworld of the average English-Canadian appears to possess a somewhat different quality. The following statement from Rod Lamirand, a resident of Surrey, B.C., expresses the subjectivity of this existential unease with remarkable accuracy: 'We [our family] were isolated, self-sufficient, cut off from a close community and from our pasts...Our family was not drawn into a neighborhood of friends because of a shared difference from mainstream society. We didn't have a name for the cultural majority because for the most part they were us. We were part of the dominant cultural society and we had no real culture. The great wash of pale European blood that saturated this continent was uniform in color only. Much of what survived is a hodgepodge of eclectic, meaningless routines...We were the product of white bread and instant coffee, Hollywood and the CBC....'2 (emphasis added) The connection between the Canadian identity crisis mentioned in the English-Canadian media and Lamirand's statement might appear distant. Surely, one might ask, the latter reflects a problem that should be labeled 'English-Canadian' rather than 'Canadian.' It is the position of this paper, however, that the discourses of English-Canadian and Canadian identity are inextricably bound. -
The Creative Process
The Creative Process THE SEARCH FOR AN AUDIO-VISUAL LANGUAGE AND STRUCTURE SECOND EDITION by John Howard Lawson Preface by Jay Leyda dol HILL AND WANG • NEW YORK www.johnhowardlawson.com Copyright © 1964, 1967 by John Howard Lawson All rights reserved Library of Congress catalog card number: 67-26852 Manufactured in the United States of America First edition September 1964 Second edition November 1967 www.johnhowardlawson.com To the Association of Film Makers of the U.S.S.R. and all its members, whose proud traditions and present achievements have been an inspiration in the preparation of this book www.johnhowardlawson.com Preface The masters of cinema moved at a leisurely pace, enjoyed giving generalized instruction, and loved to abandon themselves to reminis cence. They made it clear that they possessed certain magical secrets of their profession, but they mentioned them evasively. Now and then they made lofty artistic pronouncements, but they showed a more sincere interest in anecdotes about scenarios that were written on a cuff during a gay supper.... This might well be a description of Hollywood during any period of its cultivated silence on the matter of film-making. Actually, it is Leningrad in 1924, described by Grigori Kozintsev in his memoirs.1 It is so seldom that we are allowed to study the disclosures of a Hollywood film-maker about his medium that I cannot recall the last instance that preceded John Howard Lawson's book. There is no dearth of books about Hollywood, but when did any other book come from there that takes such articulate pride in the art that is-or was-made there? I have never understood exactly why the makers of American films felt it necessary to hide their methods and aims under blankets of coyness and anecdotes, the one as impenetrable as the other. -
LANGUAGE VARIETY in ENGLAND 1 ♦ Language Variety in England
LANGUAGE VARIETY IN ENGLAND 1 ♦ Language Variety in England One thing that is important to very many English people is where they are from. For many of us, whatever happens to us in later life, and however much we move house or travel, the place where we grew up and spent our childhood and adolescence retains a special significance. Of course, this is not true of all of us. More often than in previous generations, families may move around the country, and there are increasing numbers of people who have had a nomadic childhood and are not really ‘from’ anywhere. But for a majority of English people, pride and interest in the area where they grew up is still a reality. The country is full of football supporters whose main concern is for the club of their childhood, even though they may now live hundreds of miles away. Local newspapers criss-cross the country in their thousands on their way to ‘exiles’ who have left their local areas. And at Christmas time the roads and railways are full of people returning to their native heath for the holiday period. Where we are from is thus an important part of our personal identity, and for many of us an important component of this local identity is the way we speak – our accent and dialect. Nearly all of us have regional features in the way we speak English, and are happy that this should be so, although of course there are upper-class people who have regionless accents, as well as people who for some reason wish to conceal their regional origins. -
Fivewinners for Godolphinon a Very Special Carnival Night
2 February 2017 www.aladiyat.ae ISSUE 607 Dhs 5 FIVE winners for Godolphin on a Very Special Carnival Night Two for Saeed bin Suroor Very Special (Cape Verdi) Promising Run (Al Rashidiya) Three for Charlie Appleby Gold Trail (2410m turf handicap) Fly At Dawn (UAE 2000 Guineas Trial) Baccarat (1200m turf handicap) Arrogate ‘flies home’ to land Pegasus Arrogate ‘Locals’ Le Bernardin and Muarrab among Torchlighter Meydan stars on show this Thursday Le Bernardin Muarrab Standing at Nunnery Stud, England: MAWATHEEQ MUKHADRAM NAYEF SAKHEE Also standing in England: HAAFHD Standing in France, Haras du Mezeray: MUHTATHIR Standing in Italy, Allevamento di Besnate: MUJAHID www.shadwellstud.co.uk www.shadwellstud.co.uk Discover more about the Shadwell Stallions at www.shadwellstud.co.uk Or call Richard Lancaster, Johnny Peter-Hoblyn or Rachael Gowland on 01842 755913 Email us at: [email protected] twitter.com/ShadwellStud www.facebook.com/ShadwellStud 2 February 2017 3 Godolphin firmly in charge of Contents NEWS 3-13 Carnival owners’ title, again BLOODSTOCK 14-15 EEKING to be leading SPINNING WORLD 17 owner at the Dubai World NICHOLAS GODFREY 18 Cup Carnival for a tenth HOWARD WRIGHT 19 Sconsecutive season, Godolphin JOHN BERRY 20-21 probably secured that accolade DEREK THOMPSON 22 in one foul swoop last Thursday TOM JENNINGS 23 when their famous blue silks were carried to victory on no less than MICHELE MACDONALD 24-25 five occasions, doubling their 2017 RACING STATISTICS 27 Carnival tally. THE FONZ 29 Their main trainers, Saeed bin ENDURANCE 31 Suroor, who saddled a double and HOWJUMPING 32 th S his 200 Carnival winner in the Adam Kirby Jim Crowley QATAR 33 process, and Charlie Appleby, REVIEWS / RESULTS who registered a treble, lead the Kirby, making his seasonal debut Christophe Soumillon, in the MEYDAN (THU) 34-36 way for the trainers with five and who can now boast a 100% jockeys’ table. -
Department of English and American Studies English Language And
Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of English and American Studies English Language and Literature Jana Krejčířová Australian English Bachelor’s Diploma Thesis Supervisor: PhDr. Kateřina Tomková, Ph. D. 2016 I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. …………………………………………….. Author’s signature I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor PhDr. Kateřina Tomková, Ph.D. for her patience and valuable advice. I would also like to thank my partner Martin Burian and my family for their support and understanding. Table of Contents Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... 6 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 7 1. AUSTRALIA AND ITS HISTORY ................................................................. 10 1.1. Australia before the arrival of the British .................................................... 11 1.1.1. Aboriginal people .............................................................................. 11 1.1.2. First explorers .................................................................................... 14 1.2. Arrival of the British .................................................................................... 14 1.2.1. Convicts ............................................................................................. 15 1.3. Australia in the -
The Position of Enggano Within Austronesian
7KH3RVLWLRQRI(QJJDQRZLWKLQ$XVWURQHVLDQ 2ZHQ(GZDUGV Oceanic Linguistics, Volume 54, Number 1, June 2015, pp. 54-109 (Article) 3XEOLVKHGE\8QLYHUVLW\RI+DZDL L3UHVV For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ol/summary/v054/54.1.edwards.html Access provided by Australian National University (24 Jul 2015 10:27 GMT) The Position of Enggano within Austronesian Owen Edwards AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Questions have been raised about the precise genetic affiliation of the Enggano language of the Barrier Islands, Sumatra. Such questions have been largely based on Enggano’s lexicon, which shows little trace of an Austronesian heritage. In this paper, I examine a wider range of evidence and show that Enggano is clearly an Austronesian language of the Malayo-Polynesian (MP) subgroup. This is achieved through the establishment of regular sound correspondences between Enggano and Proto‒Malayo-Polynesian reconstructions in both the bound morphology and lexicon. I conclude by examining the possible relations of Enggano within MP and show that there is no good evidence of innovations shared between Enggano and any other MP language or subgroup. In the absence of such shared innovations, Enggano should be considered one of several primary branches of MP. 1. INTRODUCTION.1 Enggano is an Austronesian language spoken on the southernmost of the Barrier Islands off the west coast of the island of Sumatra in Indo- nesia; its location is marked by an arrow on map 1. The genetic position of Enggano has remained controversial and unresolved to this day. Two proposals regarding the genetic classification of Enggano have been made: 1. -
Braj Kachru'S Vision of World Englishes
TRIBUTE Braj Kachru’s vision of world Englishes Braj Kachru devoted his life to the idea that the English language is a plurality. In the course of his long academic career, spanning three continents, he developed the view that the English language is best termed and perceived in the plural, ‘Englishes,’ and, because of its potential for inclusivity and commonality across the world, ‘world Englishes.’ Braj’s work in conceiving and implementing the vision of world Englishes originated from his multilingual upbringing and education in India, and was further developed by his study of Indian English as a graduate student in Edinburgh in the late 1950s. At that time there was a growing interest within British linguistics, in the study of varieties of English in various parts of the world. Braj’s article on ‘The Indianness of Indian English’ in Word in 1965, shows his clear awareness of the distinctiveness of this variety, and the constellation of cultural reasons for this distinctiveness. In his view, the English language, transplanted to an area outside its traditional range, is nativized to answer to the communicational needs and sociocultural identities of its users. Pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary, and discourse serve the needs of speakers in their sociolinguistic reality, and new varieties emerge in new contexts. English (singular) is now Englishes (plural). Or is it? The applied linguistic literature of the 1960s and 1970s shows a reluctance to accept or even to acknowledge the reality of this position. Explictly or implicitly, specialists argued or assumed that ‘there could be only one’ model for learners. Or perhaps, that there could be only two models that counted, Model B (British), and Model A (American).