General Assembly Distr.: General 22 January 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Federalism and Political Problems in Nigeria Thes Is
/V4/0 FEDERALISM AND POLITICAL PROBLEMS IN NIGERIA THES IS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Olayiwola Abegunrin, B. S, Denton, Texas August, 1975 Abegunrin, Olayiwola, Federalism and PoliticalProblems in Nigeria. Master of Arts (Political Science), August, 1975, 147 pp., 4 tables, 5 figures, bibliography, 75 titles. The purpose of this thesis is to examine and re-evaluate the questions involved in federalism and political problems in Nigeria. The strategy adopted in this study is historical, The study examines past, recent, and current literature on federalism and political problems in Nigeria. Basically, the first two chapters outline the historical background and basis of Nigerian federalism and political problems. Chapters three and four consider the evolution of federal- ism, political problems, prospects of federalism, self-govern- ment, and attainment of complete independence on October 1, 1960. Chapters five and six deal with the activities of many groups, crises, military coups, and civil war. The conclusions and recommendations candidly argue that a decentralized federal system remains the safest way for keeping Nigeria together stably. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES0.0.0........................iv LIST OF FIGURES . ..... 8.............v Chapter I. THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .1....... Geography History The People Background to Modern Government II. THE BASIS OF NIGERIAN POLITICS......32 The Nature of Politics Cultural Factors The Emergence of Political Parties Organization of Political Parties III. THE RISE OF FEDERALISM AND POLITICAL PROBLEMS IN NIGERIA. ....... 50 Towards a Federation Constitutional Developments The North Against the South IV. -
Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2007 149
Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean • 2007 149 Eastern Caribbean Currency Union (ECCU)1 During 2007, the eight economies of the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union (ECCU)2 are expected to grow by 4.3% (weighted average). However, this figure hides huge differences among countries, from the booming economy of Anguilla, expanding by 11.9%, to the recessive phase in Montserrat, whose output dropped by 2.7%. Hurricane Dean, which hit in August, caused serious damage. A major economic policy concern continued to be the high levels of public debt in most countries, with four posting debt- to-GDP ratios above 100%. The countries of the ECCU can be divided into been contracted for the last three to four years, public three groups according to their growth rates in 2007. debt has continued to grow owing to the issuance The first group, the rapid-growth countries, includes of domestic debt. The latter currently accounts for Anguilla (11.9%), Saint Vincent and the Grenadines almost two thirds of total debt in Saint Kitts and (6.6%) and Antigua and Barbuda (6.1%). In the first Nevis, more than half in Antigua and Barbuda, and country, growth was led by the tourism sector, especially around one third in Saint Lucia and Saint Vincent the luxury segment. In the other two, the dynamic and the Grenadines. performance was driven by tourism-related construction. In July 2006 the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank The second group, countries with moderate growth, (ECCB) set the target for a debt-to-GDP ratio below includes Saint Kitts and Nevis (3.5%), Grenada (3.1%) 60% by 2020. -
Nigeria's Constitution of 1999
PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 constituteproject.org Nigeria's Constitution of 1999 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 Table of contents Preamble . 5 Chapter I: General Provisions . 5 Part I: Federal Republic of Nigeria . 5 Part II: Powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria . 6 Chapter II: Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy . 13 Chapter III: Citizenship . 17 Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights . 20 Chapter V: The Legislature . 28 Part I: National Assembly . 28 A. Composition and Staff of National Assembly . 28 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of National Assembly . 29 C. Qualifications for Membership of National Assembly and Right of Attendance . 32 D. Elections to National Assembly . 35 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 36 Part II: House of Assembly of a State . 40 A. Composition and Staff of House of Assembly . 40 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of House of Assembly . 41 C. Qualification for Membership of House of Assembly and Right of Attendance . 43 D. Elections to a House of Assembly . 45 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 47 Chapter VI: The Executive . 50 Part I: Federal Executive . 50 A. The President of the Federation . 50 B. Establishment of Certain Federal Executive Bodies . 58 C. Public Revenue . 61 D. The Public Service of the Federation . 63 Part II: State Executive . 65 A. Governor of a State . 65 B. Establishment of Certain State Executive Bodies . -
Legislators on Executive-Branch Boards Are Unconstitutional, Period
LEGISLATORS ON EXECUTIVE-BRANCH BOARDS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL, PERIOD Douglas Laycock* Forthcoming in WILLIAM & MARY BILL OF RIGHTS JOURNAL volume 28 ABSTRACT The Virginia General Assembly has enacted increasingly frequent exceptions to its statute prohibiting legislators from serving on executive-branch boards. But these exceptions are clearly unconstitutional. Appointing legislators to executive- branch boards violates any meaningful conception of separation of powers. The only purpose is to intrude legislative influence into the daily workings of the executive branch. Such appointments violate Virginia’s Separation of Powers Clause as interpreted by the Virginia Supreme Court. They even more clearly violate what I will call the Personal Separation Clause, which prohibits any person from exercising the powers of two branches of government at the same time. The *Robert E. Scott Distinguished Professor of Law and Professor of Religious Studies, University of Virginia, and Alice McKean Young Regents Chair in Law Emeritus, University of Texas. I am grateful to A.E. Dick Howard for helpful comments on an earlier draft and to James Hasson for research assistance. All websites cited were last visited on September 9, 2019. An earlier version of this Article circulated anonymously. I wrote anonymously because my wife was at that time President of the University of Virginia. I was unwilling to run the risk that any legislator or government official might blame her or the University for what I wrote, or that any such official might assume that she or the University put me up to writing it. I kept the project entirely secret from her; I wanted her to have not just plausible deniability, but actual, truthful, and absolute deniability. -
Final Report Anguilla General Election
ANGUILLA GENERAL ELECTION JUNE 2020 CPA BIMR ELECTION EXPERT MISSION FINAL REPORT CPA BIMR Election Expert Mission Final Report CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 INTRODUCTION TO THE MISSION 3 BACKGROUND 4 COVID-19 PANDEMIC 4 LEGAL FRAMEWORK 5 ELECTORAL SYSTEM 7 BOUNDARY DELIMITATION 7 THE RIGHT TO VOTE 9 VOTER REGISTRATION 10 ELECTION ADMINISTRATION 11 TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION 13 THE RIGHT TO STAND FOR ELECTION 13 CANDIDATE REGISTRATION 14 ELECTION CAMPAIGN 15 CAMPAIGN FINANCE 15 MEDIA 16 PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN 17 PARTICIPATION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES 17 ELECTORAL JUSTICE 18 ELECTION DAY 18 ADVANCE VOTING 18 VOTING 19 ELECTION RESULTS 20 RECOMMENDATIONS 21 1 CPA BIMR Election Expert Mission Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association British Islands and Mediterranean Region (CPA BIMR) conducted a virtual Election Expert Mission to the Anguilla General Elections in June 2020. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, research was carried out online, and interviews with a wide range of stakeholders were conducted utilising digital meeting platforms. • Due to Covid-19 restrictions, political parties and candidates could not convene campaign events until 5 June. The Supervisor of Elections was also unable to conduct some planned voter education activities. The election took place on 29 June. As Anguilla had been virus-free for over two weeks by then, social distancing or other public health measures were not required during polling and counting. • The conduct of elections in Anguilla was broadly in compliance with the human rights standards and universal principles that are applicable. The right of political participation was well-respected, with the principal exception being the absence of equality in the weight of the vote as there were vast differences in district size. -
Convention on the Rights of the Child Was Extended to Anguilla on 7 September 1994
UNITED NATIONS CRC Convention on the Distr. Rights of the Child GENERAL CRC/C/41/Add.7 22 February 2000 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION Initial reports of States parties due in 1996 Addendum OVERSEAS DEPENDENT TERRITORIES AND CROWN DEPENDENCIES OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND*1 [26 May 1999] * This document submitted by the Government of the United Kingdom contains initial reports relating to the Crown Dependencies of Anguilla, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Montserrat, Pitcairn Island, St. Helena and its dependencies, the Turks and Caicos Islands. 1 Annexes referred to in the text are available for consultation in the secretariat. GE.00-40860 (E) CRC/C/41/Add.7 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page ANGUILLA .......................................................................................... 1 - 53 3 BERMUDA........................................................................................... 54 - 129 13 BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS................................................................ 130 - 185 36 CAYMAN ISLANDS............................................................................ 186 - 235 52 MONTSERRAT .................................................................................... 236 - 291 65 PITCAIRN ISLAND ............................................................................. 292 - 323 77 ST. HELENA AND ITS DEPENDENCIES.......................................... -
The Theory of Separation of Powers in Nigeria: an Assessment
An International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia Vol. 6 (3), Serial No. 26, July, 2012 ISSN 1994-9057 (Print) ISSN 2070--0083 (Online) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v6i3.9 The Theory of Separation of Powers in Nigeria: An Assessment (Pp. 127-134) Ogoloma, Fineface - Institute of Foundation Studies, Rivers State University of Science and Technology P. M. B. 5080, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract The Theory of Separation of Powers means that, a different body of persons is to administer each of the three departments of government. That no one of them is to have a controlling power over either of the others. For the purpose of preserving the liberty of the individual and for avoiding tyranny separation of powers is necessary. In Nigeria, how has this theory been effective either during the military rules or the civilian administrations? This study is going to examine the working of separation of powers in Nigeria. Introduction The guarantee of liberty in any given government to the people is the practice of the theory of separation of powers. This theory according to Gettel, implies that, the three functions of the government ―should be performed by different bodies of persons; each department (the legislature, the executive and judiciary) limited to its own sphere of action, and within that sphere should be independent and supreme (Chaturvedi; 2006:282). The theory of separation of powers is predicated on the premise that, if a single group holds all the three powers of the government, they are bound to have unlimited powers. -
New Business Activities for St. Eustatius Creating Income by Producing Instead of Importing Report August 9 2007 Fabian Van De R
New business activities for St. Eustatius Creating income by producing instead of importing Report August 9 2007 Fabian van de Raadt University of Twente August 2007 Departure: May 07 2006 Return: July 07 2006 Address abroad: L.E. Saddlerweg z/n Oranjestad St. Eustatius Netherlands Antilles Principal: Mr. Koos Sneek, Executive Director St. Eustatius Business Association (STEBA) Oranjestad, St. Eustatius Graduation committee: Chairman: Dr. Ir. S.J. de Boer Member: Prof. Dr. P.B. Boorsma Management Summary Introduction St. Eustatius belongs to the Netherlands Antilles under the current agreement. Expectedly December 15th 20081 The Netherlands Antilles will end; St. Eustatius will get the status of a special municipality of the Netherlands. The population as of January 1st 2005 includes 2584 inhabitants2. On this moment, the high degree of imported products and services results in a negative trade balance. This is an unwanted situation for the developing island. The main problem is therefore formulated as follows: What new business activities are promising for St. Eustatius and how can these be developed? Framework The first chapter includes an introduction of the island and the main problem. Chapter 2 provides a framework to understand the followed steps. After the current situation is analyzed in chapter 3, the report consists of two parallel parts: chapter 4, which provides criteria for the alternatives, and chapter 5 and 6, which results in alternatives for new businesses. An important technique for analyzing data is the use of interviews. This technique is chosen because of the small size of the island and therefore limited data availability. An improvement in the trade balance can be achieved by two main economic possibilities: increasing export and import substitution, on which this research is concentrated. -
Budget Address 2005: Anguilla Incorporated (Inc)
BUDGET ADDRESS 2005 “ANGUILLA INCORPORATED (INC), OPEN FOR BUSINESS” PART I 1.INTRODUCTION Mr Speaker, through God’s blessings and divine providence we have been able to make it through another year so that I once again come before you and other members of this Honourable House to present the Government’s fiscal plan for the fiscal year January to December 2005. A hearty welcome, to all of you who have taken the time to attend the presentation of the 2005 Budget. A hearty welcome also to those of you listening via radio, recognizing that with the use of the Internet by Radio Anguilla, this address is accessible live to the Anguillian diaspora, that is, the Anguillian community living overseas: in other Caribbean islands; Slough, England; Toronto, Canada; New York, Washington, D.C., and Miami as well as other parts of the world. Welcome also to those of you viewing the proceedings on television. Mr Speaker, in keeping with the approach, which I have adopted during the “ten years” in which I have served as Minister of Finance and Economic Development, I propose to organize this year’s presentation around a central theme. My choice for the 2005 Budget Address is “ANGUILLA INCORPORATED (INC), OPEN FOR BUSINESS”. A bold statement Mr Speaker, but one that I intend to substantiate to the fullest. Mr Speaker, what do I mean when I say “ANGUILLA INC, OPEN FOR BUSINESS”? Mr Speaker, this theme is not simply relating to business or finance but speaks to an approach, which says that attaining particular economic and revenue growth rates is not the end in and of itself but rather a means to an end, which is the “total sustainable human development of all Anguillians”. -
Renewable Energies and Green Policy on Octs(2014)
Study on Renewable Energies and Green Policy in the OCTs Final report May 2014 EuropeAid /127054/C/SER/multi FWCBeneficiariesLot4-N°2012/307921 Study on Renewable Energies and Green Policy in the Overseas Countries and Territories FINAL REPORT May 2014 The project is funded by The project is implemented by the European Union Resources and Logistics “This report was prepared with the financial support of the European Commission and presented by RAL. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the European Commission.” Study on Renewable Energies and Green Policy in the OCTs Final report May 2014 Study on Renewable Energies and Green Policy in the OCTs Final report May 2014 Table of contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Context ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Energy challenges ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Economies and institutional framework in the OCTs ..................................................................... 2 1.4 Energy issues of the OCTs .......................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Renewable energy applications ................................................................................................... -
2020 Annual Economic and Financial Review
E A S T E R N C A R I B B E A N C E N T R A L B A N K ADDRESS Headquarters: P O Box 89 Basseterre Saint Christopher (St Kitts) and Nevis West Indies Telephone: (869) 465-2537 Facsimile: (869) 465-5615 Email: [email protected] Website: www.eccb-centralbank.org The ECCB welcomes your questions and comments on this publication. COUNTRY ECONOMISTS UNIT 2020 Annual Economic and Financial Review RESEARCH DEPARTMENT Acting Director The Eastern Caribbean Central Bank prepares an Economic and Financial Ms Patricia Welsh Review for the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union and each individual member territory for the periods ending June and December of each year. Administrative Editor Ms Patricia Welsh Mrs Beverley Labadie Contributors Senior Economists Ms Beverly Lugay (Acting) Mr Leon Bullen (Acting) Ms Martina Regis (Acting) Correspondence regarding the Annual Economic and Financial Review should be addressed to: Economists II Mr Kevin Woods The Director Economists I Research Department Ms Rochelle Harris Eastern Caribbean Central Bank Mr Peter Abraham Jr P O Box 89 BASSETERRE Statistics Department St Kitts Administrative Officer Ms Sheena Gonsalves Tel: (869) 465 2537 Fax: (869) 465 5615 Email: rd-sec@eccb- centralbank.org Cover Design Bevan & Beverley Labadie Website: http://www.eccb-centralbank.org/ Photo Credit Anguilla – Beverly Lugay Antigua and Barbuda – Peter Abraham The Annual Economic and Financial Review is a publication of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank Commonwealth of Commonwealth of Dominica – Beverly Lugay Grenada – David Bullen Montserrat – Montserrat Tourist Information Centre Saint Christopher (St Kitts) and Nevis – Beverley Labadie Saint Lucia – Saint Lucia Tourism Authority Saint Vincent and the Grenadines – Rico Audain C O N T E N T S ECONOMIC REVIEW: DOMESTIC ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS .................................................................... -
The Russia (Sanctions) (Overseas Territories) Order 2020
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2020 No. 1571 OVERSEAS TERRITORIES SANCTIONS The Russia (Sanctions) (Overseas Territories) Order 2020 Made - - - - 16th December 2020 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(1) At the Court at Windsor Castle, the 16th day of December 2020 Present, The Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty in Council Her Majesty, in exercise of the powers conferred on Her by section 63(3)(c) and (4) of the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018( a), is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to make the following Order: Citation, commencement and extent 1. —(1) This Order may be cited as the Russia (Sanctions) (Overseas Territories) Order 2020 and comes into force immediately after both the Sanctions (EU Exit) (Miscellaneous Amendments) (No. 2) Regulations 2020( b) and the Sanctions (EU Exit) (Miscellaneous Amendments) (No. 4) Regulations 2020( c) have come into force in the United Kingdom. (2) This Order extends to each British overseas territory listed in Schedule 1. Extension of the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 2. The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019(d) as amended from time to time extend to each British overseas territory listed in Schedule 1 with the modifications specified in Schedule 2. Extension of the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 3. Subject to the modification set out in paragraph (c), the following provisions of the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 extend to each British overseas territory listed in Schedule 1 for the purposes of the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 as modified and extended to the territories by this Order— (a) 2018 c.13.