(Shymkent–Tashkent Section) Road Improvement Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Completion Report Project Number: 46145-001 Loan Number: 2916 August 2018 Kazakhstan: CAREC Corridor 3 (Shymkent–Tashkent Section) Road Improvement Project This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB’s Public Communications Policy 2011. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency unit – tenge (T) At Appraisal At Project Completion (3 September 2012) (30 June 2016) T1.00 = $0.00666 $0.00295 $1.00 = T150.00 T338.25 ABBREVIATIONS AADT – annual average daily traffic ADB – Asian Development Bank CAREC – Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation COR – Committee of Roads CSC – construction supervision consultant EBRD – European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EIA – environmental impact assessment EIRR – economic internal rate of return EMP – environmental management plan EMR – environmental monitoring report GDP – gross domestic product ICB – international competitive bidding IEE – initial environmental examination IRI – international roughness index JSC – Joint Stock Company km – kilometer LARF – land acquisition and resettlement framework MID – Ministry of Investments and Development MFF – multitranche financing facility MOF – Ministry of Finance MOTC – Ministry of Transport and Communications O&M – operation and maintenance OCR – ordinary capital resources PPMS – project performance management system SMA – stone mastic asphalt TA – technical assistance VAT – value added tax VOC – vehicle operating cost GLOSSARY CAREC Transport – Western Europe–Western China International Transit Corridor running Corridor 1 from Khorgos at the border with the People’s Republic of China, through Almaty and Shymkent, to the western border with the Russian Federation. CAREC Transport – International Transit Corridor connecting the Russian Federation with the Corridor 3 Middle East and South Asia. NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Kazakhstan and its agencies ends on 31 December. “FY” before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2018 ends on 31 December 2018. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars, T refers to Kazakhstan tenge. Vice-President Wencai Zhang, Operations 1 Director General Werner Liepach, Central and West Asia Department (CWRD) Director Dong-Soo Pyo, Transport and Communications Division, CWRD Giovanni Capannelli, Kazakhstan Resident Mission (KARM), CWRD Team leader Oleg Samukhin, Transport Specialist, CWRD Team members Asem Chakenova, Project Officer, KARM, CWRD Glenda Jurado, Associate Project Analyst, CWTC, CWRD In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CONTENTS Page BASIC DATA i MAP v I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 II. DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION 1 A. Project Design and Formulation 1 B. Project Outputs 2 C. Project Costs and Financing 3 D. Disbursements 4 E. Project Schedule 5 F. Implementation Arrangements 5 G. Consultant Recruitment and Procurement 6 H. Safeguards 7 I. Monitoring and Reporting 8 III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 9 A. Relevance 9 B. Effectiveness 9 C. Efficiency 10 D. Sustainability 10 E. Development Impact 12 F. Performance of the Borrower and the Executing Agency 12 G. Performance of the Asian Development Bank 13 H. Overall Assessment 13 IV. ISSUES, LESSONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 A. Issues and Lessons 14 B. Recommendations 15 APPENDIXES 1. Design and Monitoring Framework 16 2. Project Cost at Appraisal and Actual 17 3. Project Cost by Financier 18 4. Project Contract Packages 19 5. Disbursement of ADB Loan Proceeds 20 6. Contract Awards of ADB Loan Proceeds 21 7. Chronology of Main Events 22 8. Status of Compliance with Loan Covenants 23 9. Project Implementation Schedule 30 10. Economic Reevaluation 31 11. List of Parameter Values/Assumptions 38 BASIC DATA A. Loan Identification 1. Country Republic of Kazakhstan 2. Loan number and financing source 2916-KAZ (Regular Ordinary Capital Resources) 3. Project title CAREC Corridor 3 (Shymkent–Tashkent Section) Road Improvement Project 4. Borrower Republic of Kazakhstan 5. Executing agency Ministry of Transport and Communications (changed to Ministry of Investments and Development) 6. Amount of loan Original: $125.00 million 7. Project completion report number 1695 8. Financing modality Project Loan B. Loan Data 1. Fact-Finding – Date started 24 April 2012 – Date completed 4 May 2012 2. Loan negotiations – Date started 16 August 2012 – Date completed 22 August 2012 3. Date of Board approval 5 October 2012 4. Date of loan agreement 28 May 2013 5. Date of loan effectiveness – In loan agreement 26 August 2013 – Actual 27 November 2013 – Number of extensions 1 6. Project completion date – Appraisal 31 December 2015 – Actual 26 September 2016 7. Loan closing date – In loan agreement 30 June 2016 – Actual 30 June 2016 – Number of extensions 0 8. Financial closing date – Actual 31 October 2016 9. Terms of loan – Interest rate London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) +0.60% per annum as provided by Section 3.02 of the Loan Regulations, less a credit of 0.20% as provided in Section 3.03 of the Loan Regulations 0.15% per annum – Commitment charge 0 – Maturity (number of years) 20 – Grace period (number of years) 4 10. Terms of relending (if any) Not applicable ii 11. Disbursements a. Dates Initial Disbursement Final Disbursement Time Interval 18 December 2013 31 October 2016 34.4 Effective Date Actual Closing Date Time Interval 27 November 2013 30 June 2016 31 b. Amount ($ million) Increased Canceled Last Original during during Revised Amount Undisburseda Allocation Implementation Implementation Allocation Disbursed Balance Category (1) (2) (3) (4=1+2–3) (5) (6 = 4–5) Works 111.00 0.00 33.02 77.98 77.96 0.02 Consulting 3.00 0.00 0.28 2.72 2.72 0.00 Services Contingencies 11.00 0.00 11.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 125.00 0.00 44.30 80.70 80.68 0.02 a The undisbursed balance was canceled at loan financial closing on 31 October 2016. C. Project Data 1. Project cost ($ million) Cost Appraisal Estimatea Actual Foreign exchange cost 371.20 218.61 Total 371.20 218.61 a The project was not split into foreign exchange cost and local currency cost categories at appraisal. 2. Financing plan ($ million) Cost Appraisal Estimate Actual Implementation cost Government of Kazakhstan-financed 45.40 15.93 ADB-financed (km 705–742, 37 km) 114.00 80.68 EBRD-financed (km 742–804, 62 km) 179.10 122.00 Total implementation cost 338.50 218.61 Contingencies Government of Kazakhstan-financed 4.30 0.00 ADB-financed 11.00 0.00 EBRD-financed 17.40 0.00 Total interest during construction cost 32.70 0.00 ADB = Asian Development Bank, EBRD = European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, km = kilometer. iii 3. Cost breakdown by project component ($ million) Component Appraisal Estimate Actual A. Base Costa 1. Civil Works a. km 705–742, 37 km (ADB) 111.00 77.96 b. km 742–804, 62 km (EBRD) 173.30 120.20 2. Consultants a. Construction supervision and external 3.00 2.72 safeguards monitoring (ADB) – b. Construction supervision (EBRD) 4.70 1.80 c. Institutional development (EBRD) 1.10 0.00 3. Taxes and duties 45.40 15.93 Subtotal Base Cost (A) 338.50 218.61 B. Contingenciesb 1. ADB 11.00 0.00 2. EBRD 17.40 0.00 3. Government 4.30 0.00 Subtotal Contingencies (B) 32.70 0.00 Total Project Cost (A+B) 371.20 218.61 ADB = Asian Development Bank, EBRD = European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, km = kilometer a In mid-2012 prices. b Contingencies for price escalation include a reserve for possible changes in the exchange rate from the current rate $1=T150. Physical contingencies are computed at 7% for civil works. Sources: Ministry of Transport and Communications, Ministry of Investments and Development, ADB estimates and loan financial information system. 4. Project schedule Item Appraisal Estimate Actual Date of contract with consultants (ADB financed) – Construction Supervision, Contract CSP 1 Q2/2013 18 June 2014 – Safeguards Monitor, Contract CSP 2 Q3/2015 28 October 2015 Completion of engineering designsa Civil works contract Date of award Q2/2013 28 November 2013 Completion of work Q4/2015 30 June 2016 a The Ministry of Transport and Communications (MOTC) conducted the feasibility study and design preparation in 2008. Under ADB TA 8068, the consultant studied the existing designs and reviewed the preliminary design for the feasibility study in 2012. 5. Project performance report ratings Implementation Period Rating From Q4 2013 to Q4 2013 On track From Q1 2014 to Q4 2014 On track From Q1 2015 to Q4 2015 On track From Q1 2016 to Q4 2016 On track Q = quarter. D. Data on Asian Development Bank Missions No. of No. of Specialization of Name of Missiona Date Persons Person-Days Membersb Fact-finding 24 April–4 May 2012 6 66 a, c, e, f, j Consultation 1 3–12 April 2013 3 33 a, h, j Consultation 2 3–11 June 2013 3 27 a, h, j Country safeguards review 5–15 September 2013 2 22 e, d Inception 21–30 October 2013 5 50 a, d, h Review 1 19–24 May 2014 3 18 a, j Safeguards monitoring 8–11 July 2014 4 16 d, e, j Review 2 29 September– 5 30 a, b, c, h, j 4 October 2014 Review 3 25 February–11 March 2015 5 75 a, h, j, k iv Review 4 25–30 May 2015 8 48 a, e, f, h, I, k Review 5 12–23 October 2015 1 12 b Consultation 3 14–25 January 2016 1 12 b Pre-project completion review 27–28 May 2017 4 8 a(2), h, l Project completion review 21–25 May 2018 a Missions were combined with other Kazakhstan projects.
Recommended publications
  • Economic and Social Council

    Economic and Social Council

    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council TRANS/SC.1/AC.5/2002/1 28 March 2002 Original: ENGLISH ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Working Party on Road Transport Ad hoc Meeting on the Implementation of the AGR (Eighteenth session, 10-11 June 2002 agenda item 4) CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENTS TO ANNEX 1 OF THE AGR Transmitted by Kazakhstan The Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Republic of Kazakhstan, having reviewed the text of the European Agreement on Main International Traffic Arteries (AGR) in the light of amendments 1-8 to the original text, and also the updated version of the map of the international E road network, wishes to make the following observations. Kazakhstan’s Blueprint for road traffic development outlines six main transit corridors: 1. Tashkent - Shymkent - Taraz - Bishkek - Almaty - Khorgos; 2. Shymkent - Kyzylorda - Aktyubinsk - Uralsk - Samara; 3. Almaty - Karagandy - Astana - Petropavlovsk; 4. Astrakhan - Atyrau - Aktau - Turkmen frontier; 5. Omsk - Pavlodar - Semipalatinsk - Maikapshagai; 6. Astana - Kostanay - Chelyabinsk. GE.02- TRANS/SC.1/AC.5/2002/1 page 2 Accordingly, the following amendments and additions are proposed to annex I to the AGR and the draft map of the international road network: 1. E 40. After Kharkov extend as follows: … Lugansk - Volgograd - Astrakhan - Atyrau - Beineu - Kungrad - Nukus - Bukhara - Nawoy - Samarkand - Dzhizak - Tashkent - Shymkent - Taraz - Bishkek - Almaty - Sary-Ozek - Taldykorgan - Usharal - Taskesken - Ayaguz - Georgievka - Ust-Kamenogorsk - Leninogorsk - Ust-Kan. The Leninogorsk - Ust-Kan section should be indicated on the map. 2. E 38 should be extended to Shymkent. The Kyzylorda - Shymkent section should be assigned a dual number (E 123/E 38).
  • 26 June COVID-19 Situation Report

    26 June COVID-19 Situation Report

    №6 (ISSUED BIWEEKLY) 26 JUNE 2020 COVID-19 SITUATION REPORT HIGHLIGHTS UN SUPPORTS SAFE RE-OPENING OF SCHOOLS The widespread closure of educational facilities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic presented an unprecedented risk to the education and well-being of children, especially the most vulnerable, who rely heavily on schools for their education, health, safety and nutrition. The new UNICEF guidelines provide practical guidance to central and local executive authorities on how to work together to ensure the right of every child to education, health and safety while returning to school. Schools should assess their readiness to open after quarantine and provide an improved and safe learning environment and comprehensive support for The UN Country Team in Kazakhstan congratulates the healthcare workers of Kazakhstan children, including health, nutrition, psychosocial support and quality assurance of water, sanitation and hygiene facilities. A NEW COVID-19 SURGE IN KAZAKHSTAN More on socio-economic response on page 2. NUR-SULTAN – Kazakhstan celebrated on 21 June the Healthcare Workers Day, on the occasion of which President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev decreed to award the most distinguished medical workers with medals and orders. The UN Country Team has also congratulated the medical workers, noting their outstanding contribution in UN CALLS FOR EQUAL fighting the COVID-19 outbreak. DISTRIBUTION OF WORK DURING COVID-19 Over the past three months, the medical workers have faced an unprecedented LOCKDOWN amount of work under quarantine in their hospitals away from their families to fight the pandemic. The number of COVID-19 cases is gradually growing in Kazakhstan, despite the restricted lockdown measures and information campaigns.
  • Status of Oralmans in Kazakhstan

    Status of Oralmans in Kazakhstan

    Каzakhstan STATUS OF ORALMANS IN KAZAKHSTAN OVERVIEW Almaty, 2006 AbbREVIATIONS AMD Agency for Migration and Demography CST Center for Social Technology GDP Gross domestic product IHE Institute of Higher Education IOM International Organization for Migration ILO International Labour Organization KRCS Kazakhstan Red Crescent Society KZT Kazakhstan tenge MCR monthly calculation rate NGO Non-governmental organization UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Programme RoK Republic of Kazakhstan USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CST Center for Social Technologies SSEE Specialized secondary educational establishment USA United States of America Contents FOREWORd by THE INTERNATIONAL ORgANIZATION FOR MIgRATION .................................................................................................................4 FOREWORd by THE UNITEd NATIONS dEVELOPMENT PROgRAMME .......................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARy .........................................................................................................6 INTROdUCTION ..................................................................................................................7 CHAPTER I. THE dEVELOPMENT OF ETHNIC IMMIgRATION POLICIES ..........................................7 CHAPTER II. gENERAL CHARACTERISTICS ..........................................................................................13 CHAPTER III. ECONOMIC ANd SOCIAL INTEgRATION OF ORALMANS ...........................................15 CHAPTER IV.
  • Proposed Road Map for Shymkent–Tashkent–Khujand Economic

    Proposed Road Map for Shymkent–Tashkent–Khujand Economic

    ADB Workshop 28 August 2020 Proposed Roadmap for Shymkent-Tashkent-Khujand Economic Corridor Development Bahodir Ganiev & Roman Mogilevskii ADB Consultants Outline Proposed geographic focus of Shymkent-Tashkent- Khujand economic corridor (STKEC) development Opportunities for increasing cross-border economic cooperation and integration in the STKEC region Proposed thematic focus areas for STKEC development Planned/proposed actions Proposed institutional setup for STKEC development Geographic Focus of STKEC Development Kazakhstan: • Shymkent city • Turkestan oblast Uzbekistan: • Tashkent city • Tashkent oblast Tajikistan: • Khujand city • Sughd oblast Source: Google Maps International Trade in STKEC Region Exports have similar structure and are concentrated in a few products Tashkent city and Tashkent and Sughd oblasts are national import hubs Transit trade is large (USD20.5-25.5 billion in 2018) Structure of exports, 2018 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Shymkent Turkestan Sughd Tashkent city Tashkent oblast Energy Metals Agrifood products Light industry products Other goods Trade within STKEC Region Trade within the STKEC region is relatively small and has been decreasing Importer Shymkent city and Tashkent city and Sughd oblast Exporter Turkestan oblast Tashkent oblast 2015 2018 2015 2018 2015 2018 Shymkent city and 206.8 136.1 39.2 14.1 Turkestan oblast Tashkent city and Tashkent 329.3 76.4 1.9 36.4 oblast Sughd oblast 19.6 0.9 2.3 77.5 2015 2018 Total in million USD 599.1 341.1 Total as % of KAZ-TJK-UZB total trade
  • Kazakhstan and the Kyrgyz Republic: Almaty-Bishkek Regional Road Rehabilitation Project

    Kazakhstan and the Kyrgyz Republic: Almaty-Bishkek Regional Road Rehabilitation Project

    ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Independent Evaluation Department PROJECT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT ON KAZAKHSTAN AND THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC: ALMATY-BISHKEK REGIONAL ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECT In this electronic file, the report is followed by Management’s response, and the Board of Directors’ Development Effectiveness Committee (DEC) Chair’s summary of a discussion of the report by DEC. Performance Evaluation Report Project Numbers: 29568 and 32463 Loan Numbers: 1774 and 1775 Project Performance Evaluation Report (Joint Report) March 2009 Kazakhstan and the Kyrgyz Republic: Almaty– Bishkek Regional Road Rehabilitation Project This joint evaluation report was prepared by the Independent Evaluation Department of the Asian Development Bank and the Evaluation Department of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Asian Development Bank Currency Unit (Kazakhstan) – tenge (T) At Appraisal At Project Completion At Operations Evaluation (August 2000) (October 2007) (August 2008) T1.00 = $0.0070 $0.0082 $0.0084 $1.00 = T142.400 T120.855 T119.680 Currency Unit (Kyrgyz Republic) – som (Som) At Appraisal At Project Completion At Operations Evaluation (August 2000) (October 2007) (August 2008) Som1.00 = $0.0208 $0.02895 $0.0289 $1.00 = Som47.990 Som34.540 Som34.560 European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Currency Unit (Kazakhstan) – tenge (KZT) At Appraisal (October 2000) $1 = €1.17 $1 = KZT (tenge)144 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BME – benefit monitoring and evaluation CAREC – Central Asia Regional
  • Features of Migration Trends Between Kazakhstan and Russia

    Features of Migration Trends Between Kazakhstan and Russia

    Opción, Año 35, Regular No.90-2 (2019): 434-445 ISSN 1012-1587/ISSNe: 2477-9385 Features of migration trends between Kazakhstan and Russia Bekmurat R. Naimanbayev Silkway International University, 160011, Kazakhstan, Shymkent city,Tokaev street 27 “А”(housing А) Gulfairuz Kairgaliyeva Atyrau State University named after H. Dosmukhamedova. Kazakhstan, Atyrau city, Student Avenue 212 Gulzhan Z. Orynbassarova Regional Social Innovation University 160019, Kazakhstan, Shymkent city,Tereshova street 14 Rukhsara Ynussova Silkway International University, 160011, Kazakhstan, Shymkent city,Tokaev street 27 “А”(housing А) Shavkat Rakhimkulov Silkway International University, 160011, Kazakhstan, Shymkent city,Tokaev street 27 “А”(housing А) Abstract The article analyzes the features of the migration policy of Kazakhstan and Russia at the beginning of the XXI century via comparative qualitative research methods. As a result, emigration to Russia from Kazakhstan is growing at the expense of all representatives of all ethnic groups, the main of which are Kazakhs and Russians. In conclusion, the flows of labor migrants with a vector from Kazakhstan to Russia and from Russia to Kazakhstan will increase in the medium term, especially in connection with the formation of the Eurasian Economic Union. Keywords: Migration policy, Trend, Ethnic composition. Recibido: 01-08-2019 Aceptado: 17-10-2019 435 Bekmurat R. Naimanbayev et al. Opción, Año 35, Regular No.90-2 (2019): 434-445 Características de las tendencias migratorias entre Kazajstán y Rusia Resumen El artículo analiza las características de la política de migración de Kazajstán y Rusia a principios del siglo XXI a través de métodos comparativos de investigación cualitativa. Como resultado, la emigración a Rusia desde Kazajstán está creciendo a expensas de todos los representantes de todos los grupos étnicos, principalmente kazajos y rusos.
  • Local Government and Economic Development in Kazakhstan By

    Local Government and Economic Development in Kazakhstan By

    Local Government and Economic Development in Kazakhstan by Madina Junussova A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Policy Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2017 Madina Junussova ABSTRACT The main objective of this dissertation is to understand the role of local government in economic development, with a focus on the cities and regions selected by the national government of Kazakhstan to be the drivers of national economic development by the Regional Development Program 2020. The dissertation presents three studies based on qualitative assessment of locally obtained evidence and locally produced data. The first essay examines administrative decentralization and studies how the Almaty city and Almaty region governments failed to use delegated urban planning for the management of urban development. The second essay challenges the fiscal system by exploring how the Almaty and Astana governments struggled to use national transfers provided for the implementation of national projects. The third essay focuses on political decentralization reforms and assesses the capabilities of elected representatives from Almaty, Astana, Shymkent and Aktobe city governments in managing urban transport based on public needs. Together, these three case studies provide a broader picture for understanding the productivity of the implemented administrative, fiscal and political reforms. It argues that the absence of a functioning decentralization strategy is leading to unexpected development outcomes and a lowering of public trust in local and national governments. The main contribution of the three studies is that they allow identification of key institutional weaknesses and obstacles faced by local governments in the management of local development in Kazakhstan.
  • Online Temptations: Divorce and Extramarital Affairs in Kazakhstan

    Online Temptations: Divorce and Extramarital Affairs in Kazakhstan

    religions Article Online Temptations: Divorce and Extramarital Affairs in Kazakhstan Jasmin Dall’Agnola 1 and Hélène Thibault 2,* 1 Department of Social Science, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK; [email protected] 2 Department of Political Science and International Relations, School of Sciences and Humanities, Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan 01000, Kazakhstan * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In recent years, the institution of marriage in Muslim Central Asia has undergone profound transformations in terms of religious dynamics, migration patterns, and the impact of globalization. In Kazakhstan between 2014 and 2019, every third marriage ended in divorce. By examining how Muslim Kazakhs’ support for divorce and casual sex is related to their consumption of information obtained on the Internet, mobile phone, and social media, this study contributes to the growing body of literature on the transformative forces of information and communication technology (ICT) in Kazakhstan and Central Asia. It uses a mixed-method approach that contrasts wider statistical trends from the World Values Survey Wave 7 country dataset on Kazakhstan with empirical data from focus groups conducted in five different regions of the country in 2019, involving a total of 96 respondents. The findings from the statistical and non-statistical analysis show that frequent exposure to information online influences Muslim Kazakhs’ support for extramarital affairs and divorce. Yet, frequent use of ICTs does not necessarily weaken the institution of marriage. Apart from its effect on university-educated female Kazakh youth, it seems to reinforce traditional understanding of marriage obligations among older generations and young men. Citation: Dall’Agnola, Jasmin, and Hélène Thibault.
  • Kazakhstan – Opportunities for Ppps in 2019 Shaimerden Chikanayev Advocate WHY KAZAKHSTAN?

    Kazakhstan – Opportunities for Ppps in 2019 Shaimerden Chikanayev Advocate WHY KAZAKHSTAN?

    Kazakhstan – Opportunities for PPPs in 2019 Shaimerden Chikanayev Advocate WHY KAZAKHSTAN? • There is lack of budget financing and high demand for investments in public infrastructure • Strategic geographical location (e.g. China’s Belt and Road initiative, a door to the Eurasian Economic Union, a single market of 183 million people) • Generally good legal framework (special PPP Law and Concession Law) • Strong political will of the President and Government to support PPPs • Kazakhstan’s climbed the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business index and is now ranked 28th • Strong support of Kazakhstan by MDBs (EBRD, ADB, IFC, IDB, EABR, AIIB) attracting private and international financial investment WHAT IS LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR PPPs? • Please refer to general overview of the legal framework of PPPs in Kazakhstan: https://gratanet.com/laravel- filemanager/files/3/PPP_Kazakhstan.pdf • Please refer to unofficial translations of the PPP Law and Concessions Law: https://gratanet.com/publications/law-of-the-republic- of-kazakhstan-on-public-private-partnership-unofficial- english-translation https://gratanet.com/publications/law-of-the-republic- of-kazakhstan-on-concessions-unofficial-english- translation Concession Law v PPP Law Bankability Requirement Concession Law PPP Law Legislative certainty – limited service BTO Ability for a consortium to nominate SPV Access to tax concessions Clear right to terminate International arbitration by Kazakh SPV Protection against currency exchange risk Direct negotiations (no tender required) Ability
  • Kazakhstan Country Profile

    Kazakhstan Country Profile

    Central Asia Executive Summary Series KAZAKHSTAN COUNTRY PROFILE The Program for Culture & Conflict Studies Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, CA Material contained herein is made available for the purpose of peer review and discussion and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Navy or the Department of Defense. 1 Program for Culture & Conflict Studies at Naval Postgraduate School The Naval Postgraduate School’s Program for Culture and Conflict Studies (CCS) supports the mission of Combined Joint Task Force Afghanistan commands and the International Security Assistance Force. CCS serves as a reference for mission commanders, policy makers, analysts, non-governmental organizations and the general public on issues pertaining to South and Central Asia. Our program provides a variety of information products via our team of American, Afghan and Central Asian experts, through field research, conferences and analysis. This paper on Kazakhstan provides a broad reaching, but detailed analysis of human, structural and cultural issues affecting security and development in that country. Part of our Central Asia Executive Summary Series, the profile on Kazakhstan provides significant and needed context to the overall international strategy in South and Central Asia. CCS Central Asia Executive Summary Series CCS seeks to further the education and discussion of issues pertaining to culture and conflict in South and Central Asia. CCS disseminates scholarly essays and executive summaries that attempt to contribute to the creation of a more stable environment in the region. These papers identify and discuss contemporary and interdisciplinary issues that affect US national security interests including politics, economics, ethnographic intelligence, culture, geostrategic interests, national and local development methods, regional and cooperative security, terrorism, and tribal relations.
  • EBRD Country Results Snapshot

    EBRD Country Results Snapshot

    EBRD-financed ring road, Almaty THE EBRD IN KAZAKHSTAN Related SDGs Transport infrastructure and municipal utilities 2015-20 EBRD score As the world's largest landlocked country, Kazakhstan needs good transport (1-worst, 10-best) links to unleash its full economic potential. The country faces large Municipal infrastructure needs to keep up with its expanding economy and population. In waste collection addition to traditional sovereign and sub-sovereign financing, major coverage infrastructure projects have attracted private investments, including through public-private partnerships. Despite progress, the current state of physical Quality of electricity supply infrastructure and institutional arrangements in the transport and municipal sectors remains a bottleneck to Kazakhstan's economic development and Quality of transport and requires further capital investment and greater sustainability. trade-related infrastructure 0 2 4 6 8 10 Kazakhstan OECD comparators Central Asian average How we work In numbers Quick links > Infrastructure Project The EBRD promotes connectivity, regional €1.40 billion Preparation Facility (IPPF) integration and economic inclusion by Net cumulative EBRD investment in sustainable investing in transport infrastructure and infrastructure attracting private investment to the sector. The Bank also invests heavily in municipal €248 million services, such as water, wastewater, Net cumulative EBRD investment in municipal and environmental electricity and gas. Most of the Bank’s infrastructure projects in the municipal
  • Top-Down Nationalism in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan

    Top-Down Nationalism in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan

    Portland State University PDXScholar Geography Masters Research Papers Geography 2013 Top-Down Nationalism in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan Annie M. Scriven Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/geog_masterpapers Part of the Human Geography Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, and the Social Policy Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Scriven, Annie M., "Top-Down Nationalism in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan" (2013). Geography Masters Research Papers. 15. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/geog_masterpapers/15 10.15760/geogmaster.15 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geography Masters Research Papers by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Top-Down Nationalism in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan Annie M. Scriven Submitted for partial fulfillment of Master of Science degree in Geography Portland State University Approved by: _______________________________________________________ Martha Works _______________________________________________________ Heejun Chang, Department Chair Date: December 12, 2013 Table of Contents List of Figures and Tables i List of Acronyms ii Abstract iii 1. Top Down Nationalism in Post- Soviet Kazakhstan 1 2. Nationalism 2 - Modernism 3 - Ethno-Symbolism 5 - Post-Modernism 8 - Territoriality 8 3. Kazakhstan in Context 11 - Land Use and Population 14 - Natural Resources 18 - Environmental Degradation 20 - Aral Sea 20 - Semipalatinsk Test Site 21 4. Historical Background to Multi-Ethnicity 23 - Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 1920-1991 25 5. The Role of Language and Linguistic Policy in Shaping National Identity 28 - Language Laws 1987-2000 29 - The Effects of Language Policy 32 6.