DOCSLIB.ORG

Phasing in Alternatives to Endosulfan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phasing in Alternatives to Endosulfan Phasing in Alternatives to Endosulfan Pesticides worth more than US$30 billion are intentionally released into the global environ- Reasons, experiences and links ment every year. Many of these are highly toxic and have immediate adverse effects on human health and wildlife or contaminate local food, water, soil and air. Others have chronic effects, including cancers, reproduc- tive problems, birth defects, hormonal dis- ruption and damage to the immune system. Harm may result from direct exposure during handling, spray drift, washing contaminated work clothes, storing pesticides in the home, or indirectly via pesticide dumps and per- sistence in the environment. One of these highly problematic pesticides is the insec- ticide endosulfan. Joint Paper of the PAN International working group Alternatives to Synthetic Pesticides Prepared by Susan Haffmans, PAN Germany, in cooperation with: Fernando Bejarano, RAPAM (Mexico), S. Davo Vodouhe, OBEPAB (Benin) Meriel Watts, PANAP (New Zealand), Carina Weber, PAN Germany Stephanie Williamson, PAN UK PAN Germany for PAN International, Hamburg, October 2008 Phasing in Alternatives to Endosulfan Phasing out Endosulfan Residues of endosulfan have been found in indoor Phasing in Alternatives air, rain, in all kind of water resources and in sediment, soil, tree bark, aquatic plants, fish, crocodile eggs and Endosulfan causes harm all over the world. It is very other living things. Residues have also been found in dangerous for humans and for the environment. It is food around the world, in dairy foods, meat, chicken, harmful in contact with skin, very toxic by inhalation vegetable oil, peanuts, seeds, fruit, honey, rice and many and if swallowed1. In March 2007, the Chemical Review different vegetables. As a hormone disruptor, endosulfan Committee of the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior threatens reproductive capacity. Although endosulfan Informed Consent Procedure (PIC Convention) recom- is not listed in the cancer listings of the US Environ- mended the inclusion of endosulfan in its Annex III. An- mental Protection Agency, EU or International Agency nex III is the list of chemicals that have been banned or for Research on Cancer, studies have shown that en- severely restricted for health or environmental reasons dosulfan can increase the risk of breast cancer3,4,5,6. by Parties to the Convention. In July 2007 the Council In some communities it has left a legacy of deformity of the European Union (EU) made the decision to pro- and malfunction. Many cases of poisoning, including pose endosulfan for listing in the Stockholm Convention fatalities, have been reported from Benin, Colombia, on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs Convention) Costa Rica, Cuba, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Malay- for global elimination. Pesticide Action Network (PAN) sia, Philippines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Turkey promotes the elimination of harmful pesticides and the and the USA. Endosulfan is one of the main causes of generation, innovation and promotion of ecological al- acute poisoning in Central America, in southern India ternatives to pesticides. PAN supports the inclusion of and other areas7. endosulfan in the PIC and POPs Conventions2. This leaflet provides information about existing alternatives Crops on which endosulfan is applied to endosulfan use. Endosulfan is used in banana, berry fruit, cabbage Endosulfan – negative impacts on and other crucifers, cassava, citrus, coffee, corn, cotton health, wildlife and environment and other fibre crops, cowpea, eggplant, forage crops, forest trees, garlic, lettuce, mango, mungbean, onion, Endosulfan is an organochlorine insecticide. It is used ornamentals, peanut, pepper, pigeon pea, oil crops, to control a wide range of sucking and chewing ornamentals, potato, rice, sesame, sorghum, soy- insects, including aphids, thrips, beetles, bean, squash and other cucurbits, string foliar feeding caterpillars, mites, bo- bean, sweet potato, tea, tomato, and rers, cutworms, bollworms, bugs, wheat production. whiteflies, leafhoppers and tse- In some African countries tse flies and other inverteb- endosulfan is widely used, es- rates such as snails in rice pecially in cotton cultivation. paddies and earthworms in Blood samples from cotton turf. It is applied on crops, farmers have shown detec- on farm animals and pets, table levels of endosulfan on sport fields and in other and the farmers are suffe- situations. It is widely con- ring from many symptoms of sidered to be a persistent acute endosulfan poisoning. organic pollutant (POP). It is Some of the worst cases of volatile and has the potential for poisoning were found in Benin, long-range atmospheric transport which included deaths of farmers and therefore contaminates envi- or their family members exposed to ronments far from where it is used. It endosulfan8. After almost 10 years of en- is stored in the fatty tissues of animals and vironmental damage, poisoning and deaths humans, accumulating up the food chain, including in the government of Benin announced in February 2008 mothers’ milk. that the chemical would be banned after the existing stocks are used up. 2 Phasing in Alternatives to Endosulfan Endosulfan Monograph Bad practice: countries where endosulfan is still in use The Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety identified endosulfan as an acutely toxic pesticide that po- A complete list of countries where endosulfan is cur- ses significant health problems for developing countries rently in use does not exist. But according to PAN data and economies in transition. endosulfan is still in use in the following countries: Aus- However, this statement of tralia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Cameroon, Canada, China, concern is no longer limited to Ghana, Honduras, Iceland, Indonesia, India, Iran, Is- developing countries, nor just rael, Japan, Korea, Madagascar, Mexico, New Zealand, to acute effects, nor just to hu- Pakistan, Panama, Philippines, Russia, South Africa, mans. For more information: Tanzania, Thailand, Uganda and United States. PANAP (2008): Endosulfan Monograph by Dr. Meriel Watts. http://panap.net/up- loads/media/EndosulfanMo- nograph2008June.pdf Growing crops without endosulfan - experiences and case studies Growing crops without endosulfan is Bissau, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Jordan, Kuwait, Latvia, Li- possible. thuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Malta, Mauritania, Mali, the Netherlands, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Poland, Many countries around the world show that crops can Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sin- be grown without the use of endosulfan. Daily proof is gapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, St Lucia, Sri Lanka, provided by the following 55 countries where endosulfan Sweden, Syria, the United Arab Emirates and the United is banned or strongly restricted or has been withdrawn: Kingdom. Examples from Asia, Africa, Latin America and Austria, Bahrain, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bulgaria, Bur- Europe of successful production without endosulfan give kina Faso, Cap-Vert, Cambodia, Chad, Colombia, Cote daily proof that practical alternatives to endosulfan exist d’Ivoire, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, and are technically and economically feasible. Finland, France, Gambia, Germany, Greece, Guinea Examples of no use of endosulfan around the world. Source: S. Haffmans/PAN Germany, 30.09.2008, derived from Image: BlankMap-World-v5.png, Date: 2008-09-04, Author: Chanheigeorge 3 Phasing in Alternatives to Endosulfan Growing crops without endosulfan - Growing crops without endosulfan - experiences from ASIA experiences from AFRICA India: The experience from India shows that gro- BENIN: Since 1996 a growing number of Benin wing organic cotton has not only a positive impact on the cotton farmers have proven that cotton can be grown environment and on people’s health but is also beneficial without endosulfan. Training in alternative pest manage- for the socio-economic situation of cotton farmers. While ment strategies, integrating indigenous techniques, and conventional cotton farmers use endosulfan to combat the use of plant extracts and trap crops enable the far- cotton bollworms and other pests, Indian organic farmers mers to successfully grow cotton without pesticides13. manage these with a non-chemical pest management There is now considerable experience in using a range system, based primarily on preventive measures. These of non-chemical strategies for pest management, inclu- include planting robust cotton varieties, maintaining a ding: encouraging natural predators; selection of resis- diverse crop rotation, intercropping with maize and pi- tant varieties; planting early maturing varieties which geon peas as trap crops and with flowering plants like reduce the risk of pest attacks; use of rotation and trap marigold and sunflowers to attract beneficial insects, and the use of ‘Trichocards’ containing eggs of the pa- rasitic wasp Trichogramma. Trichogramma parasitizes the eggs of the bollworm moth, one of the key pests of cotton. In addition, Indian farmers prepare and apply repellents and botanical pesticides from plants that grow locally9,10. Detailed research in 2003 and 2004 in India demonstrated that organic cotton farming can be far more profitable than conventional farming, with gross margins about 30-52% higher than in conventional pro- duction. Revenues from organic cotton sales were about 30% higher than from conventional sales11. Sri Lanka: Following the ban of endosulfan in 1998, the yields of 13 specific vegetable crops and rice, and the number of incidents of pesticide
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is the Difference Between Pesticides, Insecticides and Herbicides? Pesticide Effects on Food Production
    What is the Difference Between Pesticides, Insecticides and Herbicides? Pesticides are chemicals that may be used to kill fungus, bacteria, insects, plant diseases, snails, slugs, or weeds among others. These chemicals can work by ingestion or by touch and death may occur immediately or over a long period of time. Insecticides are a type of pesticide that is used to specifically target and kill insects. Some insecticides include snail bait, ant killer, and wasp killer. Herbicides are used to kill undesirable plants or “weeds”. Some herbicides will kill all the plants they touch, while others are designed to target one species. Pesticide Effects on Food Production As the human population continues to grow, more and more crops are needed to meet this growing demand. This has increased the use of pesticides to increase crop yield per acre. For example, many farmers will plant a field with Soybeans and apply two doses of Roundup throughout the growing year to remove all other plants and prepare the field for next year’s crop. The Roundup is applied twice through the growing season to kill everything except the soybeans, which are modified to be pesticide resistant. After the soybeans are harvested, there is little vegetative cover on the field creating potential erosion issues for the reason that another crop can easily be planted. With this method, hundreds of gallons of chemicals are introduced into the environment every year. All these chemicals affect wildlife, insects, water quality and air quality. One greatly affected “good” insect are bees. Bees play a significant role in the pollination of the foods that we eat.
    [Show full text]
  • Ri Wkh% Lrorjlfdo (Iihfwv Ri 6Hohfwhg &Rqvwlwxhqwv
    Guidelines for Interpretation of the Biological Effects of Selected Constituents in Biota, Water, and Sediment November 1998 NIATIONAL RRIGATION WQATER UALITY P ROGRAM INFORMATION REPORT No. 3 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Fish and Wildlife Service Geological Survey Bureau of Indian Affairs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ntroduction The guidelines, criteria, and other information in The Limitations of This Volume this volume were originally compiled for use by personnel conducting studies for the It is important to note five limitations on the Department of the Interior's National Irrigation material presented here: Water Quality Program (NIWQP). The purpose of these studies is to identify and address (1) Out of the hundreds of substances known irrigation-induced water quality and to affect wetlands and water bodies, this contamination problems associated with any of volume focuses on only nine constituents or the Department's water projects in the Western properties commonly identified during States. When NIWQP scientists submit NIWQP studies in the Western United samples of water, soil, sediment, eggs, or animal States—salinity, DDT, and the trace tissue for chemical analysis, they face a elements arsenic, boron, copper, mercury, challenge in determining the sig-nificance of the molybdenum, selenium, and zinc.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbamate Pesticides Aldicarb Aldicarb Sulfoxide Aldicarb Sulfone
    Connecticut General Statutes Sec 19a-29a requires the Commissioner of Public Health to annually publish a list setting forth all analytes and matrices for which certification for testing is required. Connecticut ELCP Drinking Water Analytes Revised 05/31/2018 Microbiology Total Coliforms Fecal Coliforms/ E. Coli Carbamate Pesticides Legionella Aldicarb Cryptosporidium Aldicarb Sulfoxide Giardia Aldicarb Sulfone Carbaryl Physicals Carbofuran Turbidity 3-Hydroxycarbofuran pH Methomyl Conductivity Oxamyl (Vydate) Minerals Chlorinated Herbicides Alkalinity, as CaCO3 2,4-D Bromide Dalapon Chloride Dicamba Chlorine, free residual Dinoseb Chlorine, total residual Endothall Fluoride Picloram Hardness, Calcium as Pentachlorophenol CaCO3 Hardness, Total as CaCO3 Silica Chlorinated Pesticides/PCB's Sulfate Aldrin Chlordane (Technical) Nutrients Dieldrin Endrin Ammonia Heptachlor Nitrate Heptachlor Epoxide Nitrite Lindane (gamma-BHC) o-Phosphate Metolachlor Total Phosphorus Methoxychlor PCB's (individual aroclors) Note 1 PCB's (as decachlorobiphenyl) Note 1 Demands Toxaphene TOC Nitrogen-Phosphorus Compounds Alachlor Metals Atrazine Aluminum Butachlor Antimony Diquat Arsenic Glyphosate Barium Metribuzin Beryllium Paraquat Boron Propachlor Cadmium Simazine Calcium Chromium Copper SVOC's Iron Benzo(a)pyrene Lead bis-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Magnesium bis-(ethylhexyl)adipate Manganese Hexachlorobenzene Mercury Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Molybdenum Nickel Potassium Miscellaneous Organics Selenium Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) Silver Ethylene Dibromide (EDB)
    [Show full text]
  • CHEMICALS of PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN and Their Management in the African Region
    H H C Hg H N C OH O O HO OH OH CHEMICALS OF PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN and their management in the African Region REGIONAL ASSESSMENT REPORT 4 JULY 2014 AFRO LIBRARY CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Chemicals of public health concern in the African Region and their management: Regional Assessment Report 1. Chemically-Induced Disorders – prevention & control 2. Environmental Exposure 3. Polluants environnemental – adverse effects – toxicity 4. Hazardous Substances 5. Risk Management 6. Health Impact Assessment I. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Africa II.Title ISBN: 978-929023281-0 (NLM Classification:QZ 59) © WHO REGIONAL OFFICE FOR AFRICA, 2014 Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy The mention of specific companies or of certain copyright protection in accordance with the provisions manufacturers’ products does not imply that they of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. are endorsed or recommended by the World Health All rights reserved. Copies of this publication may be Organization in preference to others of a similar nature obtained from the Library, WHO Regional Office for that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, Africa, P.O. Box 6, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo (Tel: the names of proprietary products are distinguished by +47 241 39100; +242 06 5081114; Fax: +47 241 initial capital letters. 39501; E-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate this publication All reasonable precautions have been taken by the – whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution – World Health Organization to verify the information should be sent to the same address. contained in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • CHLORPYRIFOS 2.5% GRANULAR INSECTICIDE for Professional Use Only
    CHLORPYRIFOS 2.5% GRANULAR INSECTICIDE For professional use only. Not for sale to homeowners. For Control of Various Insects (and Other Arthropods) Infesting Sod Farms, Golf Course Turf, Outdoor Areas around Industrial Plant Sites, and Ornamental Nurseries for Commercial Production Only. Active Ingredient: Chlorpyrifos: O,O-diethyl-0-(3,5,6-trichloro- 2-pyridinyl) phosphorothioate .... 2.5% Other Ingredients ....................... 97.5% Total ............................................ 100.0% FIRST AID ORGANOPHOSPHATE IF SWALLOWED: Call a physician or Poison Control Center. Drink 1 or 2 glasses of water and induce vomiting by touching back of throat with finger, or if available by administering syrup of ipecac. If person is unconscious, do not give anything by mouth and do not induce vomiting. IF ON SKIN: Wash with plenty of soap and water. Get medical attention if irritation persists. IF INHALED: Remove victim to fresh air. If not breathing, give artificial respiration, preferably mouth-to-mouth. Get medical attention. IF IN EYES: Flush eyes with plenty of water. Call a physician if irritation persists. FOR CHEMICAL EMERGENCY: Spill, leak, fire, exposure, or accident call CHEMTREC 1-800-424-9300. Have the product container or label with you when calling a poison control center or doctor, or going for treatment. For more information on this product (including health concerns, medical emergencies, or pesticide incidents), call the National Pesticide Information Center at: 1-800-858-7378. NOT TO PHYSICIAN: Chlorpyrifos is a cholinesterase inhibitor. Treat symptomatically. Atropine, only by injection, is the preferable antidote. PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS HAZARDS TO HUMANS AND DOMESTIC ANIMALS CAUTION: Harmful if swallowed or absorbed through skin or inhaled.
    [Show full text]
  • Features & Benefits
    Click Here To Purchase Features & Benefits: • TAURUS SC is a water-based suspension concentrate of 9.1% Fipronil for Pre and Post-construction termite applications, and to control perimeter pests • Apply at a rate of 4 gallons of dilution per 10 linear feet per foot of depth for termites • TAURUS SC is labeled for barrier applications targeting listed occasional invaders around structures • Now with EP/LI applications PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS ® Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals Caution TAURUS SC Harmful if swallowed, absorbed through skin or inhaled. Do not get in eyes, on skin Termiticide / Insecticide or on clothing. Do not breathe spray mist. Wash thoroughly with soap and water after handling and before eating, drinking, chewing gum, or using tobacco. Remove and It is a violation of federal law to use this product in a manner inconsistent wash contaminated clothing before reuse. with its labeling. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): • For sale to, use and storage only by individuals/firms licensed or registered All pesticide handlers (mixers, loaders, and applicators) must wear long-sleeved by the state to apply termiticide and/or general pest control products. shirt and long pants, socks, shoes, and chemical-resistant gloves. All pesticide • DO NOT use this product for termite or other pest control indoors, except for handlers must wear a dust/mist filtering respirator (MSHA/NIOSH approval number label-specified applications for termite control and foam applications to wall prefix TC-21C), or a NIOSH approved respirator with any N, R, P or HE filter, when voids for control of other listed pests. working in a non-ventilated space, including but not limited to crawl-spaces and • DO NOT use on golf course turf.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Use of Lead Arsenate and Survey of Soil Residues in Former Apple Orchards in Virginia
    HISTORICAL USE OF LEAD ARSENATE AND SURVEY OF SOIL RESIDUES IN FORMER APPLE ORCHARDS IN VIRGINIA by Therese Nowak Schooley Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN LIFE SCIENCES in Entomology Michael J. Weaver, Chair Donald E. Mullins, Co-Chair Matthew J. Eick May 4, 2006 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: arsenic, lead, lead arsenate, orchards, soil residues, historical pesticides HISTORICAL USE OF LEAD ARSENATE AND SURVEY OF SOIL RESIDUES IN FORMER APPLE ORCHARDS IN VIRGINIA Therese Nowak Schooley Abstract Inorganic pesticides including natural chemicals such as arsenic, copper, lead, and sulfur have been used extensively to control pests in agriculture. Lead arsenate (PbHAsO4) was first used in apple orchards in the late 1890’s to combat the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (Linnaeus). The affordable and persistent pesticide was applied in ever increasing amounts for the next half century. The persistence in the environment in addition to the heavy applications during the early 1900’s may have led to many of the current and former orchards in this country being contaminated. In this study, soil samples were taken from several apple orchards across the state, ranging from Southwest to Northern Virginia and were analyzed for arsenic and lead. Based on naturally occurring background levels and standards set by other states, two orchards sampled in this study were found to have very high levels of arsenic and lead in the soil, Snead Farm and Mint Spring Recreational Park. Average arsenic levels at Mint Spring Recreational Park and Snead Farm were found to be 65.2 ppm and 107.6 ppm, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Imidacloprid Movement Into Fungal Conidia Is Lethal to Mycophagous Beetles
    insects Communication Imidacloprid Movement into Fungal Conidia Is Lethal to Mycophagous Beetles 1, 2, , 3 4 Robin A. Choudhury y , Andrew M. Sutherland * y, Matt J. Hengel , Michael P. Parrella and W. Douglas Gubler 5 1 School of Earth, Environmental, and Marine Sciences, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX 78539, USA; [email protected] 2 University of California Cooperative Extension, Alameda County, Hayward, CA 94544, USA 3 Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; [email protected] 4 Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA; [email protected] 5 Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to the writing, design and completion of this work. y Received: 1 July 2020; Accepted: 30 July 2020; Published: 3 August 2020 Simple Summary: Some insects are beneficial to plants because they eat pest insects and disease-causing fungi; integrating the use of these insects into pest management can help to reduce the need for costly pesticide applications. Twenty-spotted ladybeetles eat plant pathogenic fungi, which helps to reduce disease severity for many economically important crops. In this study, we applied a systemic insecticide to the roots of pumpkin plants and monitored to see if it would be detectable in the spores of a plant pathogenic fungus and whether the insecticide-tainted fungal spores would hurt the ladybeetle larvae. We were able to chemically detect the systemic insecticide in the fungal spores up to 21 days after the plants had been treated with the fungus.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Pest Control
    SAFE PEST CONTROL U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development • Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control “For years, cockroaches have defeated our best efforts to get rid of them. We sprayed and sprayed, but they always came back. Now we under- stand there are better methods and products that really work” Environmental Health Watch Did you know...? ■ Many pesticides for home use are toxic? ■ There are alternative pest management methods that limit the use of toxic substances? ■ Mice, cockroaches, and cockroach "dust” can trigger asthma attack? What is it? Integrated pest management (IPM) is a way to remove pests, like cock- roaches, mice, and rats from a home. IPM is a common sense approach that: ■ Denies pests food, water, shelter and a way to enter the home. ■ Uses baits and powders, such as gel baits, traps and borate powder. Why use IPM? ■ IPM is safer. IPM does not use as many harmful pesticides as traditional pest control. - Avoiding pesticides is especially important in homes. Pesticides can contain long lasting, toxic chemicals or lung irritants that cause asthma attacks. Children are among those most vulnerable to exposure. IPM strategies apply pesticides only as needed and use the least hazardous pesticides to control pests. continued on back www.hud.gov/offices/lead U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development SAFE PEST CONTROL Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control Non-toxic traps can be part of an IPM strategy. If needed, call a pest control professional who uses IPM practices. If you have taken all the steps described above and still have a pest problem, you may need a professional to help.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-Cyano-3-Benzoylamino-N
    (19) TZZ _T (11) EP 2 427 427 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: C07C 255/60 (2006.01) 25.12.2013 Bulletin 2013/52 (86) International application number: (21) Application number: 10713937.0 PCT/EP2010/054862 (22) Date of filing: 14.04.2010 (87) International publication number: WO 2010/127926 (11.11.2010 Gazette 2010/45) (54) 4-CYANO-3-BENZOYLAMINO-N-PHENYL-BENZAMIDES FOR USE IN PEST CONTROL 4-CYANO-3-BENZOYLAMINO-N-PHENYL-BENZAMIDE ZUR VERWENDUNG IN DER SCHÄDLINGSBEKÄMPFUNG 4-CYANO-3-BENZOYLAMINO-N-PHÉNYL-BENZAMIDES DESTINÉS À ÊTRE UTILISÉS DANS LA LUTTE ANTIPARASITAIRE (84) Designated Contracting States: • HUETER, Ottmar Franz AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR CH-4332 Stein (CH) HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL • MAIENFISCH, Peter PT RO SE SI SK SM TR CH-4332 Stein (CH) (30) Priority: 06.05.2009 GB 0907822 (74) Representative: Herrmann, Jörg et al 18.12.2009 GB 0922234 Syngenta Crop Protection Münchwilen AG (43) Date of publication of application: Intellectual Property Department 14.03.2012 Bulletin 2012/11 Schaffhauserstrasse CH-4332 Stein (CH) (73) Proprietor: Syngenta Participations AG 4058 Basel (CH) (56) References cited: EP-A1- 1 714 958 WO-A1-2008/000438 (72) Inventors: WO-A1-2008/074427 • JUNG, Pierre Joseph Marcel CH-4332 Stein (CH) Remarks: • GODFREY, Christopher Richard Ayles Thefile contains technical information submitted after CH-4332 Stein (CH) the application was filed and not included in this specification Note: Within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent Bulletin, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to that patent, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • 11–20–03 Vol. 68 No. 224 Thursday Nov. 20, 2003 Pages 65383–65626
    11–20–03 Thursday Vol. 68 No. 224 Nov. 20, 2003 Pages 65383–65626 VerDate jul 14 2003 18:31 Nov 19, 2003 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\20NOWS.LOC 20NOWS 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 224 / Thursday, November 20, 2003 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records PUBLIC Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public Subscriptions: interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Needs Chlorpyrifos and Why (By Crop)?
    1 WHO NEEDS CHLORPYRIFOS AND WHY (BY CROP)? EXCERPTS OF COMMENTS SUBMITTED TO EPA AT EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0653 GENERAL “Consumers I have visited with that do not have any ag background are easily swayed into the belief that farmers are polluting the environment and recklessly applying chemicals. Truth is our farmers are professionals and with today’s pricing cannot afford to be over- or misapplying inputs that affect their bottom lines…. I strongly suggest that you…allow producers of the world’s food source to continue using the product chlorpyrifos.” – North Dakota farmer. “Many food crop industries in the Pacific Northwest are concerned about the impacts to pest management based on EPA’s proposed tolerance revocation of chlorpyrifos, including several minor crop groups with limited pesticide options. These industries include processed vegetables, strawberry, grass seed, mint, and cranberry. For many of these industries, chlorpyrifos has unique properties that make it an essential part of their Integrated Pest Management program. It is also an important tool for resistance management. Several of these industries have conducted research to identify effective alternatives to chlorpyrifos, but currently there aren’t viable alternatives that match the efficacy and low risk of this product for managing a number of critical pests…. A revocation of all chlorpyrifos tolerances would eliminate a number of low-risk, critical uses in cases where few alternatives exist at present, and in many cases those alternatives (neonicotinoids, pyrethroids) would be less efficacious, more expensive and have greater impacts on nontarget species including pollinators and beneficial insects. Further, the economic impacts based on resulting crop damage would be substantial.” – Oregon State University Agronomist.
    [Show full text]