21 June 2012 UN Update
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Explorando La Valoración De Los Ecosistemas Para Avanzar Hacia Un Impacto Neto Positivo Sobre La Biodiversidad En El Sector Minero
Explorando la valoración de los ecosistemas para avanzar hacia un impacto neto positivo sobre la biodiversidad en el sector minero Nathalie Olsen, Joshua Bishop y Stuart Anstee Serie Técnica de UICN y Rio Tinto nro. 1 Explorando la valoración de los ecosistemas para avanzar hacia un impacto neto positivo sobre la biodiversidad en el sector minero Nathalie Olsen, Joshua Bishop y Stuart Anstee Serie Técnica de UICN y Rio Tinto nro. 1 ISBN: 978-2-8317-1408-0 Fotografía de la cubierta: © Ravoahangy Andriamandranto Traducción: Patricia Odio-Yglesias La designación de entidades geográficas y la presentación del material en este libro no implican la expresión de ninguna opinión por parte de la UICN o de Rio Diagramado por: Tinto respecto a la condición jurídica de ningún país, territorio o área, o de sus millerdesign.co.uk autoridades, o referente a la delimitación de sus fronteras y límites. Impreso por: Los puntos de vista que se expresan en esa publicación no reflejan SRO-Kundig SA necesariamente los de la UICN o de Rio Tinto. Disponible en: UICN La UICN y Rio Tinto declinan cualquier error u omisión en la traducción de este (Unión Internacional documento de la versión original en inglés al español. para la Conservación de la Naturaleza) Publicado por: UICN, Gland, Suiza Servicio de publicaciones Derechos reservados: © 2011 Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Rue Mauverney 28 Naturaleza y de los Recursos Naturales 1196 Gland Suiza Se autoriza la reproducción de esta publicación con fines educativos y otros fines no comerciales sin permiso escrito previo de parte de quien detenta los Tel +41 22 999 0000 derechos de autor con tal de que se mencione la fuente. -
Office of the Resident Coordinator Madagascar • Dahalo1 Attack Displaces People in the South Situation Update
United Nations Nations Unies Office of the Resident Coordinator Madagascar • Dahalo 1 Attack Displaces People in the South Situation Update - 15 June 2012 This update is produced by the Resident Coordinator’s Office in collaboration with humanitarian partners. I. HIGHLIGHTS/KEY PRIOR ITIES • On 09 June 2012, heavily armed and well organized groups of dahalo (operating mostly in rural areas of Madagascar) carried out violent attacks on Ilambohazo village in the extreme southeast region of Anosy. • The attack left 6 people dead, all members of security forces (5 military personnel and 1 gendarme ). Another 7 agents were wounded and 4 are still missing. • After the attack, the dahalo threatened to attack six villages of Anosy Region in the following days which led to a population’s displacement towards Taolagnaro town. • Various local sources put the number of displaced people from the communes at risk at around 1,800 persons. Local authorities talked about some hundreds of people have temporarily settled in a piece of land in the town centre of Taolagnaro. • On 13 June , local authorities met to discuss the support they would provide to the IDPs and any other vulnerable families. • On 14 June, the Prime Minister, with the Minister of Defence, the Minister Internal Security and the Secretary of State for Gendarmerie and parliamentarians from the areas concerned, left the country’s capital city, Antananarivo, for Taolagnaro, to assess the security and humanitarian situation. • UN joint mission, chaired by the UNRC a.i. and composed of OCHA/RCO, WFP and UNICEF, also joined the Government mission to assess the humanitarian situation and prepare rapid needs assessment if necessary. -
Rep 2 out Public 2010 S Tlet Sur of Ma Urvey Rvey Adagas Repor Scar Rt
Evidence for Malaria Medicines Policy Outlet Survey Republic of Madagascar 2010 Survey Report MINSTERE DE LA SANTE PUBLIQUE www. ACTwatch.info Copyright © 2010 Population Services International (PSI). All rights reserved. Acknowledgements ACTwatch is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This study was implemented by Population Services International (PSI). ACTwatch’s Advisory Committee: Mr. Suprotik Basu Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Rik Bosman Supply Chain Expert, Former Senior Vice President, Unilever Ms. Renia Coghlan Global Access Associate Director, Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) Dr. Thom Eisele Assistant Professor, Tulane University Mr. Louis Da Gama Malaria Advocacy & Communications Director, Global Health Advocates Dr. Paul Lavani Executive Director, RaPID Pharmacovigilance Program Dr. Ramanan Senior Fellow, Resources for the Future Dr. Matthew Lynch Project Director, VOICES, Johns Hopkins University Centre for Dr. Bernard Nahlen Deputy Coordinator, President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) Dr. Jayesh M. Pandit Head, Pharmacovigilance Department, Pharmacy and Poisons Board‐Kenya Dr. Melanie Renshaw Advisor to the UN Secretary General's Special Envoy for Malaria Mr. Oliver Sabot Vice‐President, Vaccines Clinton Foundation Ms. Rima Shretta Senior Program Associate, Strengthening Pharmaceutical Systems Dr. Rick Steketee Science Director, Malaria Control and Evaluation Partnership in Africa Dr. Warren Stevens Health Economist Dr. Gladys Tetteh CDC Resident Advisor, President’s Malaria -
Small Hydro Resource Mapping in Madagascar
Public Disclosure Authorized Small Hydro Resource Mapping in Madagascar INCEPTION REPORT [ENGLISH VERSION] August 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized This report was prepared by SHER Ingénieurs-Conseils s.a. in association with Mhylab, under contract to The World Bank. It is one of several outputs from the small hydro Renewable Energy Resource Mapping and Geospatial Planning [Project ID: P145350]. This activity is funded and supported by the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), a multi-donor trust fund administered by The World Bank, under a global initiative on Renewable Energy Resource Mapping. Further details on the initiative can be obtained from the ESMAP website. This document is an interim output from the above-mentioned project. Users are strongly advised to exercise caution when utilizing the information and data contained, as this has not been subject to full peer review. The final, validated, peer reviewed output from this project will be a Madagascar Small Hydro Atlas, which will be published once the project is completed. Copyright © 2014 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / THE WORLD BANK Washington DC 20433 Telephone: +1-202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the consultants listed, and not of World Bank staff. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work and accept no responsibility for any consequence of their use. -
Species Selected by the CITES Plants Committee Following Cop14
PC19 Doc. 12.3 Annex 3 Review of Significant Trade: Species selected by the CITES Plants Committee following CoP14 CITES Project No. S-346 Prepared for the CITES Secretariat by United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre PC19 Doc. 12.3 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road Cambridge CB3 0DL United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 Email: [email protected] Website: www.unep-wcmc.org ABOUT UNEP-WORLD CONSERVATION CITATION MONITORING CENTRE UNEP-WCMC (2010). Review of Significant Trade: The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Species selected by the CITES Plants Committee Centre (UNEP-WCMC), based in Cambridge, following CoP14. UK, is the specialist biodiversity information and assessment centre of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), run PREPARED FOR cooperatively with WCMC, a UK charity. The CITES Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland. Centre's mission is to evaluate and highlight the many values of biodiversity and put authoritative biodiversity knowledge at the DISCLAIMER centre of decision-making. Through the analysis The contents of this report do not necessarily and synthesis of global biodiversity knowledge reflect the views or policies of UNEP or the Centre provides authoritative, strategic and contributory organisations. The designations timely information for conventions, countries employed and the presentations do not imply and organisations to use in the development and the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on implementation of their policies and decisions. the part of UNEP or contributory organisations The UNEP-WCMC provides objective and concerning the legal status of any country, scientifically rigorous procedures and services. territory, city or area or its authority, or These include ecosystem assessments, support concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or for the implementation of environmental boundaries. -
Evolution De La Couverture De Forets Naturelles a Madagascar
EVOLUTION DE LA COUVERTURE DE FORETS NATURELLES A MADAGASCAR 1990-2000-2005 mars 2009 La publication de ce document a été rendue possible grâce à un support financier du Peuple Americain à travers l’USAID (United States Agency for International Development). L’analyse de la déforestation pour les années 1990 et 2000 a été fournie par Conservation International. MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT, DES FORETS ET DU TOURISME Le présent document est un rapport du Ministère de l’Environnement, des Forêts et du Tourisme (MEFT) sur l’état de de l’évolution de la couverture forestière naturelle à Madagascar entre 1990, 2000, et 2005. Ce rapport a été préparé par Conservation International. Par ailleurs, les personnes suivantes (par ordre alphabétique) ont apporté leur aimable contribution pour sa rédaction: Andrew Keck, James MacKinnon, Norotiana Mananjean, Sahondra Rajoelina, Pierrot Rakotoniaina, Solofo Ralaimihoatra, Bruno Ramamonjisoa, Balisama Ramaroson, Andoniaina Rambeloson, Rija Ranaivosoa, Pierre Randriamantsoa, Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga et Marc Steininger. Le traitement des imageries satellitaires a été réalisé par Balisama Ramaroson, Minoniaina L. Razafindramanga, Pierre Randriamantsoa et Rija Ranaivosoa et les cartes ont été réalisées par Andriambolantsoa Rasolohery. La réalisation de ce travail a été rendu possible grâce a une aide financière de l’United States Agency for International Development (USAID) et mobilisé à travers le projet JariAla. En effet, ce projet géré par International Resources Group (IRG) fournit des appuis stratégiques et techniques au MEFT dans la gestion du secteur forestier. Ce rapport devra être cité comme : MEFT, USAID et CI, 2009. Evolution de la couverture de forêts naturelles à Madagascar, 1990- 2000-2005. -
Exploring Ecosystem Valuation to Move Towards Net Positive Impact on Biodiversity in the Mining Sector
Exploring ecosystem valuation to move towards net positive impact on biodiversity in the mining sector Nathalie Olsen, Joshua Bishop and Stuart Anstee IUCN and Rio Tinto Technical Series No.1 Exploring ecosystem valuation to move towards net positive impact on biodiversity in the mining sector Nathalie Olsen, Joshua Bishop and Stuart Anstee IUCN and Rio Tinto Technical Series No.1 ISBN: 978-2-8317-1379-3 Cover photo: © Ravoahangy Andriamandranto Layout by: The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the millerdesign.co.uk material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or Rio Tinto concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or Printed by: of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. SRO-Kundig SA The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN Available from: or Rio Tinto. IUCN (International Union for Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Rio Tinto, London, UK Conservation of Nature) Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Publications Services Resources Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial Switzerland purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Tel +41 22 999 0000 Fax +41 22 999 0020 Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is [email protected] prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. www.iucn.org/publications Citation: Olsen, Nathalie, Bishop, Joshua and Anstee, Stuart (2011). -
Locality of the Geological Survey Area
裏表紙 Locality of the Geological survey area Photo; landscape in the survey area Eastern K58 area East of J59 area K59 area Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................1 1.1 Background of the Project...........................................................................................1 1.2 Objectives of the Project .............................................................................................1 1.3 Survey area of the Project...........................................................................................2 1.4 Tasks of the Project.....................................................................................................3 1.5 Schedule of the Project ...............................................................................................4 1.6 Framework of implementation of the Project ...............................................................5 1.6.1 Structure of JICA Project Team.............................................................................5 1.6.2 Counterpart Organization .....................................................................................7 1.7 Works in Madagascar..................................................................................................9 1.7.1 Outline ..................................................................................................................9 1.7.2 Workshop ...........................................................................................................12 -
6203 Taolanaro
RESULTAT LEGISLATIVES 27 MAI 2019 District: TAOLANARO Commune: AMBATOABO Code Bureau: 620301010101 AMBATOABO EPP AMBATOABO SALLE 1 INSCRITS: 447 VOTANTS: 264 BLANCS ET NULS: 15 SUFFRAGE EXPRIMES: 249 N° Partie Voix Poucentage 1 INDEPENDANT RANDRIATAHIRY ELYSÉ 9 3,61% 2 INDEPENDANT Chabani NOURDINE 93 37,35% 3 IRD 85 34,14% 4 INDEPENDANT FILANTSOA RAYMOND 24 9,64% 5 INDEPENDANT ATALLAH Arline Lualdi 37 14,86% 6 INDEPENDANT Julio RAZAFINDRAMARO 1 0,40% 7 INDEPENDANT RAKOTOMALALA ANDRIAMANDRESY 0 0,00% Total des voix 249 RESULTAT LEGISLATIVES 27 MAI 2019 District: TAOLANARO Commune: AMBATOABO Code Bureau: 620301010102 AMBATOABO EPP AMBATOABO SALLE 2 INSCRITS: 444 VOTANTS: 280 BLANCS ET NULS: 7 SUFFRAGE EXPRIMES: 273 N° Partie Voix Poucentage 1 INDEPENDANT RANDRIATAHIRY ELYSÉ 8 2,93% 2 INDEPENDANT Chabani NOURDINE 97 35,53% 3 IRD 92 33,70% 4 INDEPENDANT FILANTSOA RAYMOND 30 10,99% 5 INDEPENDANT ATALLAH Arline Lualdi 44 16,12% 6 INDEPENDANT Julio RAZAFINDRAMARO 1 0,37% 7 INDEPENDANT RAKOTOMALALA ANDRIAMANDRESY 1 0,37% Total des voix 273 RESULTAT LEGISLATIVES 27 MAI 2019 District: TAOLANARO Commune: AMBATOABO Code Bureau: 620301020101 AMPAHITSY EPP AMPAHITSY INSCRITS: 134 VOTANTS: 69 BLANCS ET NULS: 4 SUFFRAGE EXPRIMES: 65 N° Partie Voix Poucentage 1 INDEPENDANT RANDRIATAHIRY ELYSÉ 9 13,85% 2 INDEPENDANT Chabani NOURDINE 13 20,00% 3 IRD 28 43,08% 4 INDEPENDANT FILANTSOA RAYMOND 5 7,69% 5 INDEPENDANT ATALLAH Arline Lualdi 9 13,85% 6 INDEPENDANT Julio RAZAFINDRAMARO 0 0,00% 7 INDEPENDANT RAKOTOMALALA ANDRIAMANDRESY 1 1,54% Total des voix 65 RESULTAT -
Profil Environnemental : Région Anosy
ONE/MO/DOC/31/ANO - ANALYSE DIAGNOSTIC ENVIRONNEMENTALE - ENJEUX ENVIRONNEMENTAUX ET INDICATEURS 2006 ONE/MO/DOC/31/ANO 1 Région Anosy Décembre 2005 ONE/MO/DOC/31/ANO 3 S O M M A I R E S O M M A I R E .................................................................................................................................................... 3 LISTE DES TABLEAUX....................................................................................................................................... 5 LISTE DES CARTES............................................................................................................................................. 5 LISTE DES ABREVIATIONS............................................................................................................................... 6 I- INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 8 I.1- CONTEXTE DU DOCUMENT .................................................................................................................... 8 I.2- RAPPELS DES TERMES DE REFERENCE................................................................................................ 8 I.3- LES OBJECTIFS......................................................................................................................................... 8 I.4- LA METHODOLOGIE PRECONISEE......................................................................................................... 8 I.5- -
Bulletin D'information Du Cluster Nutrition Resultats De La Surveillance
© UNICEF/UNI209764/Ralaivita BULLETIN D’INFORMATION DU CLUSTER NUTRITION RESULTATS DE LA SURVEILLANCE NUTRITIONNELLE DANS DIX DISTRICTS DU SUD DE MADAGASCAR TROISIEME TRIMESTRE 2020 © UNICEF/UN0280943/Rakotobe BULLETIN D’INFORMATION DU CLUSTER NUTRITION RESULTATS DE LA SURVEILLANCE NUTRITIONNELLE DANS HUIT DISTRICTTS DU SUD DE MADAGASCAR | PAGE 2 I. APERÇU DE LA SITUATION NUTRITIONNELLE Au cours du troisième trimestre 2020, dix districts du sud de Madagascar ont bénéficié des dépistages exhaustifs de la malnutrition aiguë. Cette activité a été mise en œuvre par les services déconcentrés du Gouvernement de Madagascar (Office National de Nutrition et Ministère de la Santé Publique) avec l’appui technique et financier de l’UNICEF. Sur l’ensemble des dix districts, 436.388 enfants ont été dépistés sur un total de 447.178 enfants âgés de 6 à 59 mois attendus (soit 98%). L’analyse des résultats révèle une : • Urgence nutritionnelle dans 13% des communes (26 communes sur 202) • Alerte nutritionnelle dans 14% des communes (29 communes sur 202) • Situation nutritionnelle « sous contrôle » dans 73% des communes (147 communes sur 202) © UNICEF/UNI209771/Ralaivita En 2018 et 2019, les districts de Tuléar 2 et Betroka ne faisaient pas partie des zones couvertes par le Système de Surveillance Nutritionnelle (SSN). Ainsi, en excluant ces deux districts (afin de rendre la comparaison avec ces périodes possible), les résultats du dépistage du T3 2020 montrent que la situation nutritionnelle dans les communes des huit districts n’a pas vraiment changé par rapport à T3-2019 (14% en Urgence, 15% en Alerte et 71% « sous contrôle » dans 154 communes). Il en est de même par rapport à la situation du T3 2018. -
Conservation Management and Ecological Monitoring In
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGICAL MONITORING IN MADAGASCAR’S PROTECTED AREAS Status report, October 2002 PNM Conservation management planning status report, page 1 CONTEXT Protected area management standards In the year 2000, Madagascar’s protected area service (Parcs Nationaux de Madagascar, PNM) decided that adoption of internationally recognized management systems was to be major goal of the organization. This decision was linked directly to PNM’s agreement to adopt an evaluation system developed by the World Commission for Protected Areas (WCPA), a division of the World Conservation Union (IUCN.) The WCPA evaluation system is promoted throughout the world as a means to compare the management efficiency of different protected area networks. The WCPA is in the process of establishing guidelines and norms for different aspects of protected area management. One of the first to appear was that concerned with national protected area system planning. This was presented in 2000 and, happily, PNM’s national system plan conforms closely to the WCPA recommendations. In parallel, the WCPA continued to develop guidelines and norms for conservation management, including ecological monitoring. Several models have been developed for conservation monitoring and evaluation, but there are few that specifically treat planning or implementation. However, some of the monitoring/evaluation models do require a considerable level of analysis and subsequent planning as part of their methodology. Monitoring and evaluation Ecological monitoring and evaluation of conservation success is notoriously difficult in many PA systems, and has been a constant challenge for PNM. Monitoring and evaluation are critical factors in conservation management, and any attempts to improve the effectiveness of the latter must be based on sound assessment systems.